__________________________________________________________
Note lack of reference to claims made, Liars abound!
LB
Notes BS myth maker is an amateur.
__________________________________________________________
"The image of Baphomet by the occult author Eliphas Levi is intended
to metaphorically express the qualities of the Absolute..."
"The goat head is alternately emblematic of Baphomet as fertility god,
as the 'scapegoat' (that is, sin carrier) of ancient sacrifice or as a
pagan antithesis to Jesus as 'lamb' of God."
You will find the above statements below the image of Baphomet on this
page.
REFRENCE = http://www.darkromance.com/dr-bod/dr-bod-0307/dr-bod-030717-baphomet.html
[[BAPHOMET
"The Gnostics held that it [universal agent] composed the igneous
[pertaining to fire] body of the Holy Spirit, and it was adored in the
secret rites of the Sabbat or the Temple under the hieroglyphic figure
of Baphomet or the hermaphroditic goat of Mendes ." [Pike, op. cit.,
teaching of the 28th Degree; Emphasis added]
We find it absolutely incredible that the Freemasons should portray
the Holy Spirit with the Satanic symbol, Baphomet!]]
REFRENCE = http://imaanorganization.tripod.com/imaan/id14.html
I'm sorry to seem mean, but I've done alot of research on false
religion. The refrences are above. I really wish you would have done
more research before you had put mine down. I worked really hard on
this. I guess I should have listed a few refrences but I didn't
figure that too many people would criticize.
Eliphas Levi was a man who had drawn a sybolic representation of "The
Goat of Mendes" aka. Ba Neb Tetet also spelled (Banebdjedet, Baneb
Djedet, Banaded). It was clearly his intention to be refering to Ba
Neb Tetet in his artistic depiction of Baphomet. This symbol Baphomet
surfaced in the Temple of Solomon aka. "The temple of peace of all
men". Furthermore Baphomet is known to be the "Father of the Temple
of Peace of all Men" (Father of the temple of Solomon).
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The refrences and facts you demanded |
25 Jun 2007 04:41:54 PM |
|
|
On Jun 25, 11:03 pm, "Donald E. Sterling" <donaldsterl...@gmail.com>
wrote:
__________________________________________________________
Note lack of reference to claims made, Liars abound!
LB
Notes BS myth maker is an amateur.
__________________________________________________________
"The image of Baphomet by the occult author Eliphas Levi is intended
to metaphorically express the qualities of the Absolute..."
"The goat head is alternately emblematic of Baphomet as fertility god,
as the 'scapegoat' (that is, sin carrier) of ancient sacrifice or as a
pagan antithesis to Jesus as 'lamb' of God."
You will find the above statements below the image of Baphomet on this
page.
REFRENCE =http://www.darkromance.com/dr-bod/dr-bod-0307/dr-bod-030717-baphomet....
[[BAPHOMET
"The Gnostics held that it [universal agent] composed the igneous
[pertaining to fire] body of the Holy Spirit, and it was adored in the
secret rites of the Sabbat or the Temple under the hieroglyphic figure
of Baphomet or the hermaphroditic goat of Mendes ." [Pike, op. cit.,
teaching of the 28th Degree; Emphasis added]
We find it absolutely incredible that the Freemasons should portray
the Holy Spirit with the Satanic symbol, Baphomet!]]
REFRENCE =http://imaanorganization.tripod.com/imaan/id14.html
I'm sorry to seem mean, but I've done alot of research on false
religion. The refrences are above. I really wish you would have done
more research before you had put mine down. I worked really hard on
this. I guess I should have listed a few refrences but I didn't
figure that too many people would criticize.
Eliphas Levi was a man who had drawn a sybolic representation of "The
Goat of Mendes" aka. Ba Neb Tetet also spelled (Banebdjedet, Baneb
Djedet, Banaded). It was clearly his intention to be refering to Ba
Neb Tetet in his artistic depiction of Baphomet. This symbol Baphomet
surfaced in the Temple of Solomon aka. "The temple of peace of all
men". Furthermore Baphomet is known to be the "Father of the Temple
of Peace of all Men" (Father of the temple of Solomon).
Yes but have you noted The image of Baphomet is not done as an art
work, it is assumed the Goat head etc is propaganda to discredit said
Gnostics and Templars and Masons by extension and of course any
discussion about the Temple of Solomon is pure conjecture, as no
pictures of the edifice exist just maybe some plans.
But what has this to do with your other rant?
LB
.
|
|
|
| User: "Donald E. Sterling" |
|
| Title: Re: The refrences and facts you demanded |
29 Jun 2007 02:55:39 PM |
|
|
I wrote to the alt.bible newsgroups about a biblical study that says
that the ancestry records of the bible indicate that humanity is about
6,011 years old and that this is not in correspondence with the
scientific discovery of 195,000 year old homosapiens. This is what I
got back from one Gabriel <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com > who obviously
had a need to bend the truth a bit. He even gave a reference link to
a christian science magazine.
This is the lie of science, upon which your whole argument falls apart. You
believe them when they tell you with certainty these things are thousands of
years old.
http://www.icr.org/article/2033/80/
Turns out they are wrong.
Thanks for posting.
I responded:
We agree that they must have been operating under some sort of theory
previously to this find. How else would people be able to suggest
that the dinosaur was of a recent era. This view that the dinosaur
was young may have come as a surprise to many because the previous
theory was that there is no way that fossilization could preserve
soft
tissues.
First off, what they are writing about happened in 2003. The same
scientist (Schweitzer) has since then renounced the idea that the
dinosaur was young enough to be of a recent era. It had to do with
the stone that they were preserved in. They have been studying the
layers of the earth for sometime now and have found methods to
determine how old a rock layer is. So what they did was took
dinosaur
fossils from other rock layers that they knew were 80 million years
old and ended up with the same results. They found and have
published
(since that old outdated article) that this is not a revolution in
the
dating method of a fossil but in a method of retrieving preserved
parts of it. In other words they found a new method to examine
fossils with, not a new time frame for the existence of dinosaurs.
Here is a more recent article from March 25th 2005 about the same
dig. The SAME Scientist that was in the article you found
(Schweitzer) reveals that the fossils were of a much older era.
"Attempting to dissolve the minerals from a piece of fossilized bone,
so the theory goes, would merely dissolve the entire fossil."
Notice they use the word "theory". That was the old understanding of
preservation in fossils. Here is the new information.
"Schweitzer then duplicated her findings with at least three other
well-preserved dinosaur specimens, one 80-million-year-old hadrosaur
and two 65-million-year-old tyrannosaurs. All of these specimens
preserved vessels, cell-like structures, or flexible matrix that
resembled bone collagen from modern specimens."
The refrence link is here ----> http://www.physorg.com/news3506.html
Like I said, the rock layers that they found the other fossils in
were
definitely of an 80 million year old era. They know because of the
rock layers themselves.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: The refrences and facts you demanded |
29 Jun 2007 04:28:07 PM |
|
|
On Jun 29, 8:55?pm, "Donald E. Sterling" <donaldsterl...@gmail.com>
wrote: things.
You did. Or maybe a director? But it was you, wasn't it, writing 'The
Twilight Zone'.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: The refrences and facts you demanded |
29 Jun 2007 05:13:31 PM |
|
|
On Jun 29, 5:28 pm, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Jun 29, 8:55?pm, "Donald E. Sterling" <donaldsterl...@gmail.com>
wrote: things.
You did. Or maybe a director? But it was you, wasn't it, writing 'The
Twilight Zone'.
Werewolfy
New meat!!! New meat!!!! :-)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: The refrences and facts you demanded |
30 Jun 2007 03:18:57 AM |
|
|
Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
I call myself "Werewolfy" because of my perverse
sexual attraction towards dogs. One look at that
round, brown sphincter and I'm drolling like... like...
well, like Pavlov's dogs!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: The refrences and facts you demanded |
30 Jun 2007 04:42:33 AM |
|
|
On Jun 30, 9:18?am, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
I call myself "Werewolfy" because of my perverse
sexual attraction towards dogs. One look at that
round, brown sphincter and I'm drolling like... like...
well, like Pavlov's dogs!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Now, a Troll who has imagination is one thing.
A Troll who copies the idea's of his 'target', and employs them as
being of his own making, is quite another. I refer to the use of
leaving an altered 'show/hide quoted text'..such as you have just
done, and which I did to you yesterday.
Yet again, you use a change of style I have just employed. Have you no
individuality or imagination whatsover?
Why do your supposed insults centre around animals and orrifices
intended for purposes other than for sexual gratification? Is it
because in addition to being a Fairy, you are also perverted?
A perverted Fairy addicted to theft. How...nice.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
