The Ringmaster -- new composite image at alt.binaries.pictures.misc...



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > The Ringmaster -- new composite image at alt.binaries.pictures.misc...

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android"
Date: 24 Jun 2005 09:16:51 AM
Object: The Ringmaster -- new composite image at alt.binaries.pictures.misc...
Cheers!
.

User: " John F Lemke"

Title: Re: The Ringmaster -- new composite image at alt.binaries.pictures.misc ... 24 Jun 2005 09:53:21 AM
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvin@galaxy.com> wrote in message
news:1119622842.76374f0ad185d74a23c74d43afe812fd@teranews...

Cheers!

I can't go there anymore. There's snakes there.
.

User: " John F Lemke"

Title: Re: The Ringmaster -- new composite image at alt.binaries.pictures.misc ... 24 Jun 2005 10:04:27 AM
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvin@galaxy.com> wrote in message
news:1119622842.76374f0ad185d74a23c74d43afe812fd@teranews...

Cheers!

PERFECT!!!!!!!!!
I love the little lamb chop. So apropos.
.
User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android"

Title: Re: The Ringmaster -- new composite image at alt.binaries.pictures.misc... 24 Jun 2005 11:11:27 AM
John F Lemke wrote:

"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvin@galaxy.com> wrote in message
news:1119622842.76374f0ad185d74a23c74d43afe812fd@teranews...

Cheers!



PERFECT!!!!!!!!!

I love the little lamb chop. So apropos.


Thank you ..
I notice you shoot black and white ... do you do your own processing (
films and prints ) ?
I used to shoot only 35mm black and white ... used Ilford film and their
multigrade paper plus chemicals. I had a Durst enlarger with the colour
head, but never bothered processing colour ... didn't seem as forgiving
with chemical temps.
Not that I miss the chemicals and mess and stuff, but I've found trying
to get B&W prints processed properly at most photo outlets is a
disappointing experience ... I was asked to redo a bunch of 'Johnny
Flashcube' wedding shots as B&W with a vignette effect ... the work I
did was alright ... the prints looked like ***** tho ... they used high
gloss paper ( apparently a pearl or flat finish is foreign to them )so
the tonal range was pretty narrow ... oh well.
Cheers!!
.
User: " John F Lemke"

Title: Re: The Ringmaster -- new composite image at alt.binaries.pictures.misc ... 24 Jun 2005 06:10:47 PM
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvin@galaxy.com> wrote in message
news:1119629735.d159049c47ee7ed36b4a24141a7c1f51@teranews...

John F Lemke wrote:

"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvin@galaxy.com> wrote in message
news:1119622842.76374f0ad185d74a23c74d43afe812fd@teranews...

Cheers!



PERFECT!!!!!!!!!

I love the little lamb chop. So apropos.



Thank you ..

I notice you shoot black and white ... do you do your own processing (
films and prints ) ?

Basically experimenting as far as black and white goes. I hadn't shot b+w
for a long time and someone suggested trying some Ilford Delta 3200. I was
trying to catch some wildlife action on an area lake early in the morning.
Herons and Sandhill cranes doing acrobatics over the water.
I found a lab in the area that'll process and do a proof sheet at a
reasonable cost but I'm told that anymore you're actually better off
shooting color, then processing, then taking the negs to PhotoShop and
playing around then desaturating the color. I guess you're no further along
digitizing b+w negs on the home computer.
For prints, in general, I'm doing my little thing on the computer, burning
to disk then dropping the disk off at a lab.
I think what it may come to is just doing black and white for some special
situation then having the lab do an old fashioned wet system print. Still
takes most of the creativity out of my hands but this is a pretty special
lab from what I've heard.


I used to shoot only 35mm black and white ... used Ilford film and their
multigrade paper plus chemicals. I had a Durst enlarger with the colour
head, but never bothered processing colour ... didn't seem as forgiving
with chemical temps.

I admire you guys for that experience and hope that the old wet darkroom
techniques are never lost.
I just bought a new film camera and the young man that sold it to me loves
shooting 6X6 b+w and getting lost in the darkroom.
A few years ago a retired client of mine offered me his old wet darkroom for
$50.00. Everything I'd need to get going in b+w with a Beseler color head.
I couldn't believe it. I talked him up to $100.00 because of the quality of
the deal. :-) I thought about it and I just didn't have the time to sink
into learning and then putting the time into processing and printing. It
all would have just gone to waste. He ended up giving it to a young guy in
the area that's a hemophiliac and couldn't get out of the house much.
That's where the stuff really belonged.
Al, the retired client, has been an amateur photographer for more than 50
years. He's switched over to a digital darkroom. Other shooters I've
talked to haven't been in their wet darkroom for months on end now. Seems
like going the digital route is the best way to go in general, altho black
and white is meant to be done the old fashioned way.
Waiting for the digital camera technology to mature a bit more before I buy
one. I seem to be spending too much time now scanning negs. So there ya
go.


Not that I miss the chemicals and mess and stuff, but I've found trying
to get B&W prints processed properly at most photo outlets is a
disappointing experience ... I was asked to redo a bunch of 'Johnny
Flashcube' wedding shots as B&W with a vignette effect ... the work I
did was alright ... the prints looked like ***** tho ... they used high
gloss paper ( apparently a pearl or flat finish is foreign to them )so
the tonal range was pretty narrow ... oh well.

Marv noticed but "Johnny Flashcube" was probably thrilled. Johnny Lemke
probably would have been thrilled. :-)
You can sink an awful lot of money into it all, for sure. So far I've been
pretty successful at holding the budget in check.
Photography is art for Everyman. That's why it's "art" for me. :-) It's
like playing duffer golf (that's me too). If you get one or two good shots
per round you can get hooked and love it.


Cheers!!

Happy shooting, as they say.
.
User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android"

Title: Re: The Ringmaster -- new composite image at alt.binaries.pictures.misc... 24 Jun 2005 06:39:16 PM
John F Lemke wrote:

"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvin@galaxy.com> wrote in message
news:1119629735.d159049c47ee7ed36b4a24141a7c1f51@teranews...

John F Lemke wrote:

"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvin@galaxy.com> wrote in message
news:1119622842.76374f0ad185d74a23c74d43afe812fd@teranews...


Cheers!



PERFECT!!!!!!!!!

I love the little lamb chop. So apropos.



Thank you ..

I notice you shoot black and white ... do you do your own processing (
films and prints ) ?



Basically experimenting as far as black and white goes. I hadn't shot b+w
for a long time and someone suggested trying some Ilford Delta 3200. I was
trying to catch some wildlife action on an area lake early in the morning.
Herons and Sandhill cranes doing acrobatics over the water.

I found a lab in the area that'll process and do a proof sheet at a
reasonable cost but I'm told that anymore you're actually better off
shooting color, then processing, then taking the negs to PhotoShop and
playing around then desaturating the color. I guess you're no further along
digitizing b+w negs on the home computer.

For prints, in general, I'm doing my little thing on the computer, burning
to disk then dropping the disk off at a lab.

I think what it may come to is just doing black and white for some special
situation then having the lab do an old fashioned wet system print. Still
takes most of the creativity out of my hands but this is a pretty special
lab from what I've heard.

I hear ya ... that's why I went with my own darkroom ( dorkroom? ).
Black and white is fairly forgiving with the processing. The fun starts
when you do your own films. If you need high shutter speed, you can
underexpose the full roll then extend development time ... and it also
works the other way too, over-expose then under-develop.
Black and white has a real charm to it ... you're working with only
light and shape. I loved it, but marriage, kids and such robbed me of
time and space.

I used to shoot only 35mm black and white ... used Ilford film and their
multigrade paper plus chemicals. I had a Durst enlarger with the colour
head, but never bothered processing colour ... didn't seem as forgiving
with chemical temps.



I admire you guys for that experience and hope that the old wet darkroom
techniques are never lost.

My neice has all of my hardware ... she used for a year or so. I've
toyed with the idea of getting it back and setting it up again.

I just bought a new film camera and the young man that sold it to me loves
shooting 6X6 b+w and getting lost in the darkroom.

A few years ago a retired client of mine offered me his old wet darkroom for
$50.00. Everything I'd need to get going in b+w with a Beseler color head.
I couldn't believe it. I talked him up to $100.00 because of the quality of
the deal. :-) I thought about it and I just didn't have the time to sink
into learning and then putting the time into processing and printing. It
all would have just gone to waste. He ended up giving it to a young guy in
the area that's a hemophiliac and couldn't get out of the house much.
That's where the stuff really belonged.

.... find this book....
'The Complete Guide To Photography' by Michael Langford.
My sister lent this book to me ... it covers absolutely *everything*.
The book isn't much more then 200 pages. It will grab your interest
immediately. With this book, I learnt everything I needed to know about
photography and darkroom work. I never had to reference another book.

Al, the retired client, has been an amateur photographer for more than 50
years. He's switched over to a digital darkroom. Other shooters I've
talked to haven't been in their wet darkroom for months on end now. Seems
like going the digital route is the best way to go in general, altho black
and white is meant to be done the old fashioned way.

Absolutely. Digital's amazing and convenient, but it hasn't come
anywhere near reproducing black and white darkroom prints.

Waiting for the digital camera technology to mature a bit more before I buy
one. I seem to be spending too much time now scanning negs. So there ya
go.

Scanning sucks ... :-)

Not that I miss the chemicals and mess and stuff, but I've found trying
to get B&W prints processed properly at most photo outlets is a
disappointing experience ... I was asked to redo a bunch of 'Johnny
Flashcube' wedding shots as B&W with a vignette effect ... the work I
did was alright ... the prints looked like ***** tho ... they used high
gloss paper ( apparently a pearl or flat finish is foreign to them )so
the tonal range was pretty narrow ... oh well.



Marv noticed but "Johnny Flashcube" was probably thrilled. Johnny Lemke
probably would have been thrilled. :-)

I shot a wedding last summer digitally ... a first. You still freak out
worrying 'something' is going to go wrong and you'll have to convince
everyone to go back into the church and repeat the whole ceremony over
.... but ... nothing went wrong. I had an Olympus 2.0 Megapixal camera
with 10X stabilized optical zoom. A little Photoshopping and the bride
and groom where thrilled. The whole series of shots in the church were
close and tight and very intimate. One of my better 'wedding episodes'.

You can sink an awful lot of money into it all, for sure. So far I've been
pretty successful at holding the budget in check.

You know what tho? It's hard to put a price tag on something like that
.... my Mom passed away from breast cancer when I was but a whee lad of
three. All I ever had to remember her by was a few black and white
photos. I knew the houses, the steps everything about every shot ...
photography freezes an instant of time, it captures something *exactly*
as it was, without interpretation. I absolutely love it.

Photography is art for Everyman. That's why it's "art" for me. :-) It's
like playing duffer golf (that's me too). If you get one or two good shots
per round you can get hooked and love it.

We should play golf sometime ... I don't play often, mostly because
everyone I know can golf half decently. Not that I'm saying anything
'bad' about your game .... 9_9

Cheers!!




Happy shooting, as they say.


.
User: " John F Lemke"

Title: Re: The Ringmaster -- new composite image at alt.binaries.pictures.misc ... 24 Jun 2005 11:00:44 PM
Snippage involved:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvin@galaxy.com> wrote in message
news:1119656638.a02d69b43bae8d398136a02f8c870c89@teranews...

John F Lemke wrote:

I think what it may come to is just doing black and white for some

special

situation then having the lab do an old fashioned wet system print.

Still

takes most of the creativity out of my hands but this is a pretty

special

lab from what I've heard.


I hear ya ... that's why I went with my own darkroom ( dorkroom? ).

NEVER a dorkroom. Hallowed ground where man enters a mystical wrestling
match with the gods of light. :-)
Sorry, I've had too much rest this week.
I'll more than likely never set foot in a working darkroom but would hate to
see that art become lost art.

Black and white is fairly forgiving with the processing. The fun starts
when you do your own films. If you need high shutter speed, you can
underexpose the full roll then extend development time ... and it also
works the other way too, over-expose then under-develop.

I've done just a little bit of reading about it. It really sounds
intriguing.


Black and white has a real charm to it ... you're working with only
light and shape. I loved it, but marriage, kids and such robbed me of
time and space.

Ah but the love you have for it shows itself quickly, Master. :-)

I admire you guys for that experience and hope that the old wet darkroom
techniques are never lost.


My neice has all of my hardware ... she used for a year or so. I've
toyed with the idea of getting it back and setting it up again.

I'll bet we won't have to talk long before you talk yourself right into it.
At the risk of turning completely into Ann Landers tonight: I've got an
acquaintance that shoots large format. He's a bit older than I am. He's
kind of from the old school it seems where you know and stick with quality
equipment but try really hard to spend as little as possible. He told me he
wants very badly to get a macro lens for his 4 X 5 but it would cost as much
as his entire kit. Next time the subject comes up I'm going to ask him if
he knows exactly how much longer he's going to live. :-) Ah, more
profundity.

... find this book....

'The Complete Guide To Photography' by Michael Langford.

It's on the list. Next time I go to Barnes and Noble I'll get a copy.


My sister lent this book to me ... it covers absolutely *everything*.
The book isn't much more then 200 pages. It will grab your interest
immediately. With this book, I learnt everything I needed to know about
photography and darkroom work. I never had to reference another book.

Them's the best kind to have. Thanks.


Al, the retired client, has been an amateur photographer for more than

50

years. He's switched over to a digital darkroom. Other shooters I've
talked to haven't been in their wet darkroom for months on end now.

Seems

like going the digital route is the best way to go in general, altho

black

and white is meant to be done the old fashioned way.


Absolutely. Digital's amazing and convenient, but it hasn't come
anywhere near reproducing black and white darkroom prints.

And being able to do something like your own b+w work is pretty special.


Waiting for the digital camera technology to mature a bit more before I

buy

one. I seem to be spending too much time now scanning negs. So there

ya

go.


Scanning sucks ... :-)

Haha!!! Yeah, no kidding. I'm having issues with my scanner right now.


I shot a wedding last summer digitally ... a first. You still freak out
worrying 'something' is going to go wrong and you'll have to convince
everyone to go back into the church and repeat the whole ceremony over
... but ... nothing went wrong. I had an Olympus 2.0 Megapixal camera
with 10X stabilized optical zoom. A little Photoshopping and the bride
and groom where thrilled. The whole series of shots in the church were
close and tight and very intimate. One of my better 'wedding episodes'.

I've heard you can get some great results with "smaller" digital cameras.
The technology changes so quickly it's amazing.
Lotta stress with weddings. For everyone. I'm going to one tomorrow. I
guess the bride's face has broken out and all from the stress.
I'll be staying out of the pro photographer's way taking some background
shots I guess you'd call it. This is the second (church) wedding for this
couple. I took pictures of their civil wedding 18 months ago. It was tense
for me and I'm glad they weren't expecting professional results.


You can sink an awful lot of money into it all, for sure. So far I've

been

pretty successful at holding the budget in check.


You know what tho? It's hard to put a price tag on something like that
... my Mom passed away from breast cancer when I was but a whee lad of
three. All I ever had to remember her by was a few black and white
photos. I knew the houses, the steps everything about every shot ...
photography freezes an instant of time, it captures something *exactly*
as it was, without interpretation. I absolutely love it.

It reflects how a moment in time can affect a heart.
So a tragedy for a child and the memories from photographs produced an
artist, Marv.
And you get pleasure from making newlyweds smile when they get their proofs
back.
One big thrill I got came when I gave my boy an enlargement, a snap
portrait, of him and his dog (my grandson again) on their couch. Big open
smile when he pulled it out of the envelope. He loves his boy. :-)


Photography is art for Everyman. That's why it's "art" for me. :-)

It's

like playing duffer golf (that's me too). If you get one or two good

shots

per round you can get hooked and love it.


We should play golf sometime ... I don't play often, mostly because
everyone I know can golf half decently. Not that I'm saying anything
'bad' about your game .... 9_9

That's all I need to do is get beat by a Canadian. Thanks. We're supposed
to have longer summers here and be better golfers. I'd better get out on
the course again quick.
I'm really not all that competitive when it comes to golf. The pleasure for
me can be in the quality of just one shot. I hit a 3 wood straight as an
arrow about 200 yards on #10 today and put it on the green about 8 feet from
the pin. Salvaged the whole freakin' day. :-)
.






  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER