Should this 'Asteroid' hit Mars - it will put our "Earthly" Rotation
- into a flux 'state'. That this planet {Earth) might never 'recover'
from !!!
Just A "Worst Case Senerio" - that we must take SERIOUSLY.
But, everything is a 'possibility' HERE.;
And No STONE - Should Be Left - 'Un-Turned'.
Terrorist could use this as a 'CAUSE (and effect), OR Terorists could
use this as a 'Sign' (from The Almighty)'!!!
Either way, it will take American 'Stamina' - to 'HOLD DOWN' the Fort
(etude).
8< |
.
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Time For YOU -To Be All 'Relative' Here |
04 Jan 2008 05:29:31 AM |
|
|
On 4 Jan, 10:07, kmiller <mille...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
"And No STONE - Should Be Left - 'Un-Turned'."
Yours is an interesting choice of words, considering the subject
matter, Kim.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: Time For YOU -To Be All 'Relative' Here |
04 Jan 2008 04:24:05 AM |
|
|
On Jan 4, 5:07=A0am, kmiller <mille...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Should this 'Asteroid' =A0hit Mars - it will put our "Earthly" Rotation
- into a flux 'state'. That this planet {Earth) might never 'recover'
from !!!
Just A "Worst Case Senerio" - that we must take SERIOUSLY.
But, everything is a 'possibility' HERE.;
And No STONE - Should Be Left - 'Un-Turned'.
Terrorist could use this as a 'CAUSE (and effect), OR Terorists could
use this as a 'Sign' (from The Almighty)'!!!
Either way, it will take American 'Stamina' - to 'HOLD DOWN' the Fort
(etude).
8< |
Either way, it will take American 'Stamina' - to 'HOLD DOWN' the Fort
(etude).
And 'American Belief' - "That Might Is Right" - to 'stave off' all
Alien 'Counterparts' !!!
Right [or Wrong], It must be "Death To All" ( the TRUE American Way).
God "Help" The American's !!! (8- { )
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Time For YOU -To Be All 'Relative' Here |
04 Jan 2008 06:11:19 AM |
|
|
"kmiller" <miller.k@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3ad7e7dc-94c9-481f-91a0-5339ab4c9b58@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 4, 5:07 am, kmiller <mille...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Should this 'Asteroid' hit Mars - it will put our "Earthly" Rotation
- into a flux 'state'. That this planet {Earth) might never 'recover'
from !!!
Just A "Worst Case Senerio" - that we must take SERIOUSLY.
But, everything is a 'possibility' HERE.;
And No STONE - Should Be Left - 'Un-Turned'.
Terrorist could use this as a 'CAUSE (and effect), OR Terorists could
use this as a 'Sign' (from The Almighty)'!!!
Either way, it will take American 'Stamina' - to 'HOLD DOWN' the Fort
(etude).
8< |
Either way, it will take American 'Stamina' - to 'HOLD DOWN' the Fort
(etude).
And 'American Belief' - "That Might Is Right" - to 'stave off' all
Alien 'Counterparts' !!!
Right [or Wrong], It must be "Death To All" ( the TRUE American Way).
God "Help" The American's !!! (8- { )
There isn't much chance that the size of the asteroid will significantly
affect the orbit or spin of Mars, Kim, if it strikes.There will be no effect
on the earth's rotation or orbit, Kim. No reputable scientist has said there
is even a remote chance of that happening. If the impact occurs, it'll be a
first for astronomers and astrophysicists and much should be learned from
the asteroid impacts. But, first, it must overcome great odds and strike
Mars. I hear the odds were (last) about 3.6%, down from 3.9% earlier.
The same concerns about the comet fragments that hit Jupiter were expressed
by astrologers and psychics in 1994, but the Earth experienced nothing of
note...other than a brief bout of mild hysteria from the public and elation
from astro-scientists. Jupiter was temporarily stunned, but the planet is
massive and didn't succumb to the multiple impacts.
You're overheatin', Kim, and you need a good long ice bath...I suggest you
watch Nickelodeon's cartoons for a few days and the Comedy Channel. Relax!
More likely, your and my end, and most of us in this group, will come
unceremoniously from the ravages of old age.
Doc
Posted on Wed, Jan. 02, 2008 10:15 PM
Odds of Mars-asteroid collision drop
Los Angeles Times
LOS ANGELES | The odds of a collision between asteroid 2007 WD5 and Mars
later this month have gone down, scientists said Wednesday.
The chances of a collision on Jan. 30 are currently about 3.6 percent, said
Don Yeomans, manager of NASA's Near-Earth Objects Program at the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.
In late December, Yeomans said, the odds of a collision between the Red
Planet and the 160-foot-wide space rock rose as high as 3.9 percent. Those
were the best odds ever recorded by the nine-year-old Near-Earth Objects
office, which was set up to track objects that might threaten Earth.
Most of the time, astronomers in the office root against a collision. This
time, they were hoping for one. Were it to hit, it would provide a bonanza
of scientific results.
The asteroid's most likely course would cause it to miss Mars by 22,000
miles.
http://www.kansascity.com/news/nation/story/428327.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Time For YOU -To Be All 'Relative' Here |
04 Jan 2008 10:03:10 AM |
|
|
"Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
=A0Either way,
Oh, monkey! You poor, poor, deeply disturbed monkey....
Changing sock puppets doesn't really change you. You're
just as retarded, just as incapable of saying anything
worth reading. Please keep your rants down to a sentence
or less.
Thanks in advance, monkey.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Time For YOU -To Be All 'Relative' Here |
05 Jan 2008 06:55:15 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fac9bdd6-0def-4821-aa14-1dffd1b5d5a5@5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
"Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
Either way,
Oh, monkey! You poor, poor, deeply disturbed monkey....
Changing sock puppets doesn't really change you. You're
just as retarded, just as incapable of saying anything
worth reading. Please keep your rants down to a sentence
or less.
Thanks in advance, monkey.
I must emphasize that your posts, in reply, more and more are
disassociative. Perhaps it's the falling out you've had with Michel,
angering him by attempting some pseudo-clever arcane predictions faintly,
pathetically reminiscent of his vastly superior poetic, cryptic style.
Or, perhaps, it's your own advancing mental deterioration from 15 years of
banal bantering and senseless harassment on the usenet.
Or, just maybe...just possibly, you've contracted AIDS and don't yet know
it, and it's eating out what's left of your minute brain.
Nonetheless, you exist only to irritate and exploit, adding little to
discussions much like a hot desert wind rearranges grains of sand.
Blow your air, lil' fairy, and certainly keep being redundant and boring --
we'd expect nothing less.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: Time For YOU -To Be All 'Relative' Here |
07 Jan 2008 01:38:26 AM |
|
|
On Jan 4, 7:11=A0am, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"kmiller" <mille...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3ad7e7dc-94c9-481f-91a0-5339ab4c9b58@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 4, 5:07 am, kmiller <mille...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Should this 'Asteroid' hit Mars - it will put our "Earthly" Rotation
- into a flux 'state'. That this planet {Earth) might never 'recover'
from !!!
Just A "Worst Case Senerio" - that we must take SERIOUSLY.
But, everything is a 'possibility' HERE.;
And No STONE - Should Be Left - 'Un-Turned'.
Terrorist could use this as a 'CAUSE (and effect), OR Terorists could
use this as a 'Sign' (from The Almighty)'!!!
Either way, it will take American 'Stamina' - to 'HOLD DOWN' the Fort
(etude).
8< |
=A0Either way, it will take American 'Stamina' - to 'HOLD DOWN' the Fort
(etude).
And 'American Belief' - "That Might Is Right" - to 'stave off' all
Alien 'Counterparts' !!!
Right [or Wrong], It must be "Death To All" ( the TRUE American Way).
God "Help" The American's !!! (8- { )
There isn't =A0much chance that the size of the asteroid will significantl=
y
affect the orbit or spin of Mars, Kim, if it strikes.There will be no effe=
ct
on the earth's rotation or orbit, Kim. No reputable scientist has said the=
re
is even a remote chance of that happening. If the impact occurs, it'll be =
a
first for astronomers and astrophysicists and much should be learned from
the asteroid impacts. But, first, it must overcome great odds and strike
Mars. I hear the odds were (last) about 3.6%, down from 3.9% earlier.
The same concerns about the comet fragments that hit Jupiter were expresse=
d
by astrologers and psychics in 1994, but the Earth experienced nothing of
note...other than a brief bout of mild hysteria =A0from the public and ela=
tion
from astro-scientists. Jupiter was temporarily stunned, but the planet is
massive and didn't succumb to the multiple impacts.
You're overheatin', Kim, and you need a good long ice bath...I suggest you=
watch Nickelodeon's cartoons for a few days and the Comedy Channel. Relax!=
More likely, your and my end, and most of us in this group, will come
unceremoniously from the ravages of old age.
Doc
Posted on Wed, Jan. 02, 2008 10:15 PM
Odds of Mars-asteroid collision drop
Los Angeles Times
LOS ANGELES | The odds of a collision between asteroid 2007 WD5 and Mars
later this month have gone down, scientists said Wednesday.
The chances of a collision on Jan. 30 are currently about 3.6 percent, sai=
d
Don Yeomans, manager of NASA's Near-Earth Objects Program at the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.
In late December, Yeomans said, the odds of a collision between the Red
Planet and the 160-foot-wide space rock rose as high as 3.9 percent. Those=
were the best odds ever recorded by the nine-year-old Near-Earth Objects
office, which was set up to track objects that might threaten Earth.
Most of the time, astronomers in the office root against a collision. This=
time, they were hoping for one. Were it to hit, it would provide a bonanza=
of scientific results.
The asteroid's most likely course would cause it to miss Mars by 22,000
miles.
http://www.kansascity.com/news/nation/story/428327.html- Hide quoted text =
-
- Show quoted text -
That message was 'CODED" - in-case you didn't notice ???
- Should Al-Quada use this as a "Symbolic Messiah Message" - than the
'Forces That Be' (C.I.A.) - must act 'QUICKLY'.
- Should this present a THREAT to Earth's existance - than NASA needs
to step-in- immediately.
Either way, It is a "Call To Arms" !!!
:-|
.
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: Time For YOU -To Be All 'Relative' Here |
07 Jan 2008 01:49:22 AM |
|
|
On Jan 7, 2:38=A0am, kmiller <mille...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
On Jan 4, 7:11=A0am, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"kmiller" <mille...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3ad7e7dc-94c9-481f-91a0-5339ab4c9b58@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 4, 5:07 am, kmiller <mille...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Should this 'Asteroid' hit Mars - it will put our "Earthly" Rotation
- into a flux 'state'. That this planet {Earth) might never 'recover'
from !!!
Just A "Worst Case Senerio" - that we must take SERIOUSLY.
But, everything is a 'possibility' HERE.;
And No STONE - Should Be Left - 'Un-Turned'.
Terrorist could use this as a 'CAUSE (and effect), OR Terorists could
use this as a 'Sign' (from The Almighty)'!!!
Either way, it will take American 'Stamina' - to 'HOLD DOWN' the Fort
(etude).
8< |
=A0Either way, it will take American 'Stamina' - to 'HOLD DOWN' the Fort=
(etude).
And 'American Belief' - "That Might Is Right" - to 'stave off' all
Alien 'Counterparts' !!!
Right [or Wrong], It must be "Death To All" ( the TRUE American Way).
God "Help" The American's !!! (8- { )
There isn't =A0much chance that the size of the asteroid will significan=
tly
affect the orbit or spin of Mars, Kim, if it strikes.There will be no ef=
fect
on the earth's rotation or orbit, Kim. No reputable scientist has said t=
here
is even a remote chance of that happening. If the impact occurs, it'll b=
e a
first for astronomers and astrophysicists and much should be learned fro=
m
the asteroid impacts. But, first, it must overcome great odds and strike=
Mars. I hear the odds were (last) about 3.6%, down from 3.9% earlier.
The same concerns about the comet fragments that hit Jupiter were expres=
sed
by astrologers and psychics in 1994, but the Earth experienced nothing o=
f
note...other than a brief bout of mild hysteria =A0from the public and e=
lation
from astro-scientists. Jupiter was temporarily stunned, but the planet i=
s
massive and didn't succumb to the multiple impacts.
You're overheatin', Kim, and you need a good long ice bath...I suggest y=
ou
watch Nickelodeon's cartoons for a few days and the Comedy Channel. Rela=
x!
More likely, your and my end, and most of us in this group, will come
unceremoniously from the ravages of old age.
Doc
Posted on Wed, Jan. 02, 2008 10:15 PM
Odds of Mars-asteroid collision drop
Los Angeles Times
LOS ANGELES | The odds of a collision between asteroid 2007 WD5 and Mars=
later this month have gone down, scientists said Wednesday.
The chances of a collision on Jan. 30 are currently about 3.6 percent, s=
aid
Don Yeomans, manager of NASA's Near-Earth Objects Program at the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.
In late December, Yeomans said, the odds of a collision between the Red
Planet and the 160-foot-wide space rock rose as high as 3.9 percent. Tho=
se
were the best odds ever recorded by the nine-year-old Near-Earth Objects=
office, which was set up to track objects that might threaten Earth.
Most of the time, astronomers in the office root against a collision. Th=
is
time, they were hoping for one. Were it to hit, it would provide a bonan=
za
of scientific results.
The asteroid's most likely course would cause it to miss Mars by 22,000
miles.
http://www.kansascity.com/news/nation/story/428327.html-Hide quoted text =
-
- Show quoted text -
That message was 'CODED" - in-case you didn't notice ???
=A0- Should Al-Quada use this as a "Symbolic Messiah Message" - than the
'Forces That Be' (C.I.A.) - must act 'QUICKLY'.
=A0- Should this present a THREAT to Earth's existance - than NASA needs
to step-in- immediately.
Either way, It is a "Call To Arms" !!!
:-|- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Let me 're-phrase' that !!!
It was mean't as a "Call To Arms" (regardless).
Those that "Needed To Know" (knew what I meant).
And that is all that matters.
;< |
.
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: Time For YOU -To Be All 'Relative' Here |
07 Jan 2008 01:56:52 AM |
|
|
On Jan 7, 2:49=A0am, kmiller <mille...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
On Jan 7, 2:38=A0am, kmiller <mille...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
On Jan 4, 7:11=A0am, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"kmiller" <mille...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3ad7e7dc-94c9-481f-91a0-5339ab4c9b58@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com..=
..
On Jan 4, 5:07 am, kmiller <mille...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Should this 'Asteroid' hit Mars - it will put our "Earthly" Rotation=
- into a flux 'state'. That this planet {Earth) might never 'recover=
'
from !!!
Just A "Worst Case Senerio" - that we must take SERIOUSLY.
But, everything is a 'possibility' HERE.;
And No STONE - Should Be Left - 'Un-Turned'.
Terrorist could use this as a 'CAUSE (and effect), OR Terorists coul=
d
use this as a 'Sign' (from The Almighty)'!!!
Either way, it will take American 'Stamina' - to 'HOLD DOWN' the For=
t
(etude).
8< |
=A0Either way, it will take American 'Stamina' - to 'HOLD DOWN' the Fo=
rt
(etude).
And 'American Belief' - "That Might Is Right" - to 'stave off' all
Alien 'Counterparts' !!!
Right [or Wrong], It must be "Death To All" ( the TRUE American Way).
God "Help" The American's !!! (8- { )
There isn't =A0much chance that the size of the asteroid will signific=
antly
affect the orbit or spin of Mars, Kim, if it strikes.There will be no =
effect
on the earth's rotation or orbit, Kim. No reputable scientist has said=
there
is even a remote chance of that happening. If the impact occurs, it'll=
be a
first for astronomers and astrophysicists and much should be learned f=
rom
the asteroid impacts. But, first, it must overcome great odds and stri=
ke
Mars. I hear the odds were (last) about 3.6%, down from 3.9% earlier.
The same concerns about the comet fragments that hit Jupiter were expr=
essed
by astrologers and psychics in 1994, but the Earth experienced nothing=
of
note...other than a brief bout of mild hysteria =A0from the public and=
elation
from astro-scientists. Jupiter was temporarily stunned, but the planet=
is
massive and didn't succumb to the multiple impacts.
You're overheatin', Kim, and you need a good long ice bath...I suggest=
you
watch Nickelodeon's cartoons for a few days and the Comedy Channel. Re=
lax!
More likely, your and my end, and most of us in this group, will come
unceremoniously from the ravages of old age.
Doc
Posted on Wed, Jan. 02, 2008 10:15 PM
Odds of Mars-asteroid collision drop
Los Angeles Times
LOS ANGELES | The odds of a collision between asteroid 2007 WD5 and Ma=
rs
later this month have gone down, scientists said Wednesday.
The chances of a collision on Jan. 30 are currently about 3.6 percent,=
said
Don Yeomans, manager of NASA's Near-Earth Objects Program at the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.
In late December, Yeomans said, the odds of a collision between the Re=
d
Planet and the 160-foot-wide space rock rose as high as 3.9 percent. T=
hose
were the best odds ever recorded by the nine-year-old Near-Earth Objec=
ts
office, which was set up to track objects that might threaten Earth.
Most of the time, astronomers in the office root against a collision. =
This
time, they were hoping for one. Were it to hit, it would provide a bon=
anza
of scientific results.
The asteroid's most likely course would cause it to miss Mars by 22,00=
0
miles.
http://www.kansascity.com/news/nation/story/428327.html-Hidequoted text=
-
- Show quoted text -
That message was 'CODED" - in-case you didn't notice ???
=A0- Should Al-Quada use this as a "Symbolic Messiah Message" - than the=
'Forces That Be' (C.I.A.) - must act 'QUICKLY'.
=A0- Should this present a THREAT to Earth's existance - than NASA needs=
to step-in- immediately.
Either way, It is a "Call To Arms" !!!
:-|- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Let me 're-phrase' that !!!
It was mean't as a "Call To Arms" (regardless).
Those that "Needed To Know" (knew what I meant).
And that is all that matters.
;< |- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Who's F#CKING with my POSTs here (again)
You know that it was suppose to say:.
"It was meant as a 'Call To Arms' (regardless)".
And NOT
It was mean't as a "Call To Arms" (regardless).
'DOC' - you Democratic 'Elephant Lovin' F#CK - HEAD.
STOP F'ING with my POSTs !!!
8< |
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Time For YOU -To Be All 'Relative' Here |
09 Jan 2008 03:36:25 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 23:56:52 -0800 (PST), kmiller
<miller.k@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Who's F#CKING with my POSTs here (again)?
It's Milka.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pers3id" |
|
| Title: Re: Time For YOU -To Be All 'Relative' Here |
07 Jan 2008 02:35:51 AM |
|
|
kmiller <miller.k@sympatico.ca> wrote in
news:ef6a750a-2a2d-444d-be79-97be9f0811ca@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
- Show quoted text -
Let me 're-phrase' that !!!
It was mean't as a "Call To Arms" (regardless).
Those that "Needed To Know" (knew what I meant).
And that is all that matters.
;< |- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Who's F#CKING with my POSTs here (again)
Miller.. I think you've lost your fucking mind my friend.
There is the edge, and then there is the abyss.. some time back
I believe you took a nose-dive into the latter.
You know that it was suppose to say:.
"It was meant as a 'Call To Arms' (regardless)".
And NOT
It was mean't as a "Call To Arms" (regardless).
'DOC' - you Democratic 'Elephant Lovin' F#CK - HEAD.
STOP F'ING with my POSTs !!!
8< |
.
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: Time For YOU -To Be All 'Relative' Here |
10 Jan 2008 12:50:39 AM |
|
|
On Jan 7, 3:35=A0am, Pers3id <pers...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
kmiller <mille...@sympatico.ca> wrote innews:ef6a750a-2a2d-444d-be79-97be9=
f0811ca@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
- Show quoted text -
Let me 're-phrase' that !!!
It was mean't as a "Call To Arms" (regardless).
Those that "Needed To Know" (knew what I meant).
And that is all that matters.
;< |- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Who's F#CKING with my POSTs here (again)
Miller.. I think you've lost your fucking mind my friend.
There is the edge, and then there is the abyss.. some time back
I believe you took a nose-dive into the latter.
You know that it was suppose to say:.
"It was meant as a 'Call To Arms' (regardless)".
And NOT
It was mean't as a "Call To Arms" (regardless).
'DOC' - you Democratic 'Elephant Lovin' F#CK - HEAD.
STOP F'ING with my POSTs !!!
8< |- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Looks to ME - that your 'REFERENCE' here is referring to my
'incorrect' post.
'DOC' wins - again. !!!
My 'correct' post shows up in your reply - but you probably didn't
notice that - did you.
- > "It was meant as a 'Call To Arms' (regardless).
8< |
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
