Hi Doc,
Thanks for replying. While I had St. Malachy somewhat in mind when I spoke
about the papacy, i.e. that he he might have two successors ('Glory of the
Olives'--short-lived, and then 'Petrus', the final Pope), I wasn't really
considering the April 8th eclipse to be tied in directly with John Paul II
himself, so thank you for jogging my memory. Perhaps I ought to, I'm not
quite sure. What I'm certainly not doing is saying JPII is somehow a part of
the Demonic Duo, in case that's what you were thinking, which I doubt. You
and I both know he's probably one of the most saintly men who have walked
this earth, let alone among those who have held that office in Rome.
As far as St. Malachy is concerned, while I believe him to be credible
enough so as to use some of his ideas (and then only to a certain degree),
as with very few, if any other human 'seers', 'prophets' and the like, I
certainly don't base any of my own ultimate conclusions upon any of them. If
I find that someone has already come to the same conclusions about certain
matters, I'll certainly study their work, methodology, etc., and if it
jibes, I'll include it within my own work, hopefully giving them their due
credit for such.
Much the same way that we both came to the conclusion that the February
23/24, 1997 announcement of Dolly the lamb had strong if not obviously
direct ties with Daniel's 'abomination of desolation' prophecy very shortly
after that event occurred. Having made the same conclusions upon a single
event, we probably have gone in two separate and disparate tangents in our
individual analyses of its ties to the past, implications for the future,
etc., which is the way it ought to work. There's not much point in drawing
upon someone else's observations, conclusions, etc. and subsequently
following them in lockstep fashion (whether deliberately or accidentally),
whether or not it ultimately results in absolute failure or absolute
success.
After all, the study of Biblical endtime prophecy isn't exactly a pure
science, like mathematics or physics, although it may have strong undertones
of such. There are far too many unknown variables at play to even be able to
say, without equivocation, that 1 plus 1 equals 2, at least not in every
instance. Perhaps even using physics as an example of 'truth' is a misnomer,
because in quantum physics, there's a constant 'uncertainty factor' in
effect, and after 90 years or so of its discovery, nobody has ever been able
to get a mathematical grasp on it so as to construct even the most simple of
hypotheses based upon it, let alone a working model.
Yet it is God Himself who created those physics, laws and the like--the very
same God who gave us the Bible and the prophecies contained within it. And I
am, once again, attempting to delve into His own methodology at least enough
to understand the most basic of equations at play, primarily through the
very words He spoke through the ancient prophets whose works are detailed in
the Bible. That is, and always has been, my main source of information,
coupled with observations upon current historical and astronomical events.
That's my methodology, pure and simple, and I truly believe it to be the
correct one, certainly the one yielding the most positive results, in my
estimation. This is in spite of the fact that most people cannot seem to be
able to grasp even the most basic elements of this methodology, let alone
the various observations, and thus the conclusions derived from them.
William, I want you to read Isaiah 28, the whole chapter, and think
carefully about what's being said there, who it's being said about, and try
to apply it to what I've been going through for the past ten years, as if
the one being spoken of was me, doing what I'm doing, or trying to do, in
these Last Days. It isn't a bright picture, full of success and applause,
but one of dismal, exasperated failure. Read the full chapter, and think of
Dan Millar, the drunk.
I want you to reply, if only to tell me I'm full of myself, which I'll
kindly accept, or at least acknowledge. At that point, I'll tell you to look
over the evidence I provided in my Covenant II email, and think about it,
hopefully prompting you to study the material and text provided. Very little
of it concerns myself personally, but what it does have to say is still an
incontrovertible segment.
I want you to reply, because I'm alone now, and have nobody else to talk
with, not a single soul. Not even Jesus talks to me, for five years running
now. If for no other reason than to save my sanity, please pray for
understanding, on both our parts, and tell me what happens next.
Dan
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: To a friend |
25 Jan 2005 11:38:07 PM |
|
|
*HIS* ELECT WROTE:
"DAN" *YOU* "ARE" *NOT* "ALONE" *WE* "ARE" *ALL* "ALONE" *BECAUSE*
"GOD" *IS* "NOT" *PART* "OF" *THIS* "WICKEDNESS" *AND* "WE" *HAVE* "TO"
*RELY* "UPON" *OUR* "TRUST" *IN* "GOD" *TO* "FORGIVE" *US* "FOR"
*TRANSGRESSING* "AGAINST" *HIS* "LAWS".
"NONE" *CARE* "THAT" *GOD* "IS" *BEING* "TREATED" *WITH* "THE" *MOST*
"BLATANT" *AND* "DISGUSTING" *CONTEMPT* "THAT" *ANYBODY* "CAN" *FEEL*
"AND" *HONESTLY* "DAN" *I* "DO" *NOT* "FAULT" *GOD* "AS" *MAN* "HAS"
*DONE* "THESE" *THINGS* "AND" *THEN* "BLAMES" *GOD* "FOR" *TAKING*
"ACTION" *ON* "THEM" *FOR* "THEIR" *WICKED* "AND" *DOWNRIGHT* "EVIL"
*SCHEMES* "OF" *DOMINANCE* "AGAINST" *HIS* "CREATION"!!!
"I" *PRAY* "THEIR" *SHAME* "BE" *ON* "THEIR" *HEADS* "FOR" *WHAT* "THEY
"HAVE" *DONE* "TO" *THIS* "WONDERFUL" *AND* "COMPLETELY" *OF* "GOD"
*LIFE* "THAT" *WE* "SHARE" *TOGETHER*!!! *NO*, "I" *WILL* "NOT" *TURN*
"BACK" *EITHER* "FROM" *THIS* "CONFRONTATION" *THAT* "IS" *GETTING*
"READY" *TO* "UNLEASH" *HERE* "AND" *THEY* "ALL" *HAD* "BETTER" *KNOW*
"THAT" *I* "WILL" *SEND* "THEM" *AWAY* "AS" *I* "HAVE" *SEEN* "ENOUGH"
*EVIL-HEARTED* "MEN" *TO* "LAST" *ME* "MY" *LIFETIME*!!!
*YOU* "CAN" *PLACE* "YOUR" *CARES* "IN" *HIS* "HANDS" *DAN* "AND"
*ALLOW* "FOR" *GOD* "TO" *WORK* "THINGS" *OUT* "FOR" *YOU* "AND"
*TRUST* "THAT" *GOD* "HAS" *YOUR* "BEST" *INTEREST* "AT" *HEART*.
*YES*, "THERE" *ARE* "THOSE" *IN* "THIS" *LIFE* "WHO" *HAVE* "KNOWN"
*THE* "FATHER" *AND* "I" *AM* "ONE" *OF* "THOSE" *WHO* "LIVES" *FOR*
"GOD" *AND* "HIS" *CHILDREN* "AS" *HE* "MAKES" *THIS* "ALL" *POSSIBLE*
"FOR" *US*!!!
"YOU" *HAVE* "AN" *OPPORTUNITY* "TO" *FOCUS* "ON" *THINGS* "BETTER"
*WHEN* "YOUR" *DISTRACTIONS* "ARE" *REDUCED* "TO" *A* "MINIMUM", *DOWN*
"HERE" *THEY* (LEADERS) "PURPOSELY" *INDUCE* "CHAOS" *SO* "THE"
*PEOPLE* "DO" *NOT* "RECOGNIZE" *THEIR* "BEING" *ROBBED* "BLIND" *OF*
"ALL" *THEIR* "GOD" *GIVEN* "RIGHTS" *TO* "BE" *FREE* "OF" *THE
SCOURGE*!!!
*KEEP* "THE" *FAITH* "AND" *REMAIN* "COMMITTED" *TO* "YOUR" *TRUST*
"IN" *GOD*... *KNOW* "THIS", *WHEN* "THINGS" *ARE* "AT" *THERE*
"WORST" *GOD* "IS" *AT* "HIS" *BEST* "AND" *NOW* "IS" *THE* "TIME"
*FOR* "YOU" *TO* "DRAW" *CLOSE* "TO" *HIS* "PROMISE" *AND* "HOLD"
*ONTO* "IT" *WITH* "ALL" *OF* "YOUR" *MIGHT*!!! *GOD* "WILL" *DELIVER*
"THEE"!!!
I Bid *YOU* Peace...
*HIS* Elect "PRAYS" *FOR* "YOUR" *ALONENESS* "TO" *BE* "HEALED" *AS*
"JESUS" *PROVIDES* "YOU" *WITH* "HIS" *HEALING* "GRACE" *TO* "UPLIFT"
*YOUR* "SPIRITS".
P=2ES. *WHEN* "THINGS" *SEEM* "COMPLETELY" *OUT* "OF" *YOUR* "CONTROL"
*PRAISE* "GOD" *FOR* "HE" *IS* "TAKING" *OVER* "AND" *CARRYING* "YOU"
*OVER* "THE" *HARD* "TIMES".
P=2ES.S. "IT" *TAKES* "ABSOLUTE" *TRUST* "IN" *GOD* "TO" *BELEIVE*
"THAT" *AND* "THAT" *IS* "WHAT" *WILL* "SAVE" *YOUR* "LIFE" *WHEN*
"HIS" *SALVATION* "COMES" *TO* "CLAIM" *THOSE* "WHO" *LIVE* "BY" *HIS*
"WAYS" *AND* "UPHOLD" *HIS* "LAWS".
Main Entry: sal=B7va=B7tion
Pronunciation: sal-'vA-sh&n
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Old French, from Late Latin salvation-,
salvatio, from salvare to save =97more at SAVE
Date: 13th century
1 a : deliverance from the power and effects of sin b : the agent or
means that effects salvation c : Christian Science : the realization of
the supremacy of infinite Mind over all bringing with it the
destruction of the illusion of sin, sickness, and death
2 : liberation from ignorance or illusion
3 a : preservation from destruction or failure b : deliverance from
danger or difficulty
- sal=B7va=B7tion=B7al /-shn&l, -sh&-n&l/ adjective
"SIN" *IS* "NOT" *AN* "ILLUSION" *IT* "IS" *REAL* "AND" *DEADLY* "AS"
*SIN* "IS" *THE* "TRANSGRESSING" *AGAINST* "HIS" *LAWS* aka
"COMMANDMENTS"!!!
Main Entry: trans=B7gress
Pronunciation: tran(t)s-'gres, tranz-
Function: verb
Etymology: Middle French transgresser, from Latin transgressus, past
participle of transgredi to step beyond or across, from trans- + gradi
to step =97more at GRADE
Date: 1526
transitive senses
1 : to go beyond limits set or prescribed by : VIOLATE <transgress
divine law>
2 : to pass beyond or go over (a limit or boundary)
intransitive senses
1 : to violate a command or law : SIN
2 : to go beyond a boundary or limit
- trans=B7gres=B7sive /-'gre-siv/ adjective
- trans=B7gres=B7sor /-'gre-s&r/ noun
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TaDa Pope" |
|
| Title: Re: To a friend |
24 Jan 2005 11:44:09 PM |
|
|
Subject: To a friend
From: "Dan Millar"
Date: 1/24/2005 9:21 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <EHkJd.164596$Xk.72786@pd7tw3no>
Hi Doc,
Thanks for replying. While I had St. Malachy somewhat in mind when I spoke
about the papacy, i.e. that he he might have two successors ('Glory of the
Olives'--short-lived, and then 'Petrus', the final Pope), I wasn't really
considering the April 8th eclipse to be tied in directly with John Paul II
himself, so thank you for jogging my memory. Perhaps I ought to, I'm not
quite sure. What I'm certainly not doing is saying JPII is somehow a part of
the Demonic Duo, in case that's what you were thinking, which I doubt. You
and I both know he's probably one of the most saintly men who have walked
this earth, let alone among those who have held that office in Rome.
As far as St. Malachy is concerned, while I believe him to be credible
enough so as to use some of his ideas (and then only to a certain degree),
as with very few, if any other human 'seers', 'prophets' and the like, I
certainly don't base any of my own ultimate conclusions upon any of them. If
I find that someone has already come to the same conclusions about certain
matters, I'll certainly study their work, methodology, etc., and if it
jibes, I'll include it within my own work, hopefully giving them their due
credit for such.
Much the same way that we both came to the conclusion that the February
23/24, 1997 announcement of Dolly the lamb had strong if not obviously
direct ties with Daniel's 'abomination of desolation' prophecy very shortly
after that event occurred. Having made the same conclusions upon a single
event, we probably have gone in two separate and disparate tangents in our
individual analyses of its ties to the past, implications for the future,
etc., which is the way it ought to work. There's not much point in drawing
upon someone else's observations, conclusions, etc. and subsequently
following them in lockstep fashion (whether deliberately or accidentally),
whether or not it ultimately results in absolute failure or absolute
success.
After all, the study of Biblical endtime prophecy isn't exactly a pure
science, like mathematics or physics, although it may have strong undertones
of such. There are far too many unknown variables at play to even be able to
say, without equivocation, that 1 plus 1 equals 2, at least not in every
instance. Perhaps even using physics as an example of 'truth' is a misnomer,
because in quantum physics, there's a constant 'uncertainty factor' in
effect, and after 90 years or so of its discovery, nobody has ever been able
to get a mathematical grasp on it so as to construct even the most simple of
hypotheses based upon it, let alone a working model.
Yet it is God Himself who created those physics, laws and the like--the very
same God who gave us the Bible and the prophecies contained within it. And I
am, once again, attempting to delve into His own methodology at least enough
to understand the most basic of equations at play, primarily through the
very words He spoke through the ancient prophets whose works are detailed in
the Bible. That is, and always has been, my main source of information,
coupled with observations upon current historical and astronomical events.
That's my methodology, pure and simple, and I truly believe it to be the
correct one, certainly the one yielding the most positive results, in my
estimation. This is in spite of the fact that most people cannot seem to be
able to grasp even the most basic elements of this methodology, let alone
the various observations, and thus the conclusions derived from them.
William, I want you to read Isaiah 28, the whole chapter, and think
carefully about what's being said there, who it's being said about, and try
to apply it to what I've been going through for the past ten years, as if
the one being spoken of was me, doing what I'm doing, or trying to do, in
these Last Days. It isn't a bright picture, full of success and applause,
but one of dismal, exasperated failure. Read the full chapter, and think of
Dan Millar, the drunk.
I want you to reply, if only to tell me I'm full of myself, which I'll
kindly accept, or at least acknowledge. At that point, I'll tell you to look
over the evidence I provided in my Covenant II email, and think about it,
hopefully prompting you to study the material and text provided. Very little
of it concerns myself personally, but what it does have to say is still an
incontrovertible segment.
I want you to reply, because I'm alone now, and have nobody else to talk
with, not a single soul. Not even Jesus talks to me, for five years running
now. If for no other reason than to save my sanity, please pray for
understanding, on both our parts, and tell me what happens next.
Dan
Yes, well there is a full moon on tomorrow
I guess I should go to shopping at Safeway.
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
* D OUOSVAVV M *
*PUBLIUS ENIGMA*
Oh Joy!
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Millar" |
|
| Title: Re: To a friend |
25 Jan 2005 05:46:23 PM |
|
|
"TaDa Pope" <tadapope@aol.comWOMP> wrote in message
Yes, well there is a full moon on tomorrow
I guess I should go to shopping at Safeway.
Unless you come up to Vancouver, don't be expecting to come across a lunatic
employee there named Dan. On second thought, check out the bakery there, as
insanity is a prerequisite for employment in that department.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: To a friend |
28 Jan 2005 01:15:30 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 05:21:40 GMT, "Dan Millar" <noreply@microsoft.com>
wrote:
Hi Doc,
Thanks for replying. While I had St. Malachy somewhat in mind when I spoke
about the papacy, i.e. that he he might have two successors ('Glory of the
Olives'--short-lived, and then 'Petrus', the final Pope), I wasn't really
considering the April 8th eclipse to be tied in directly with John Paul II
himself, so thank you for jogging my memory. Perhaps I ought to, I'm not
quite sure. What I'm certainly not doing is saying JPII is somehow a part of
the Demonic Duo, in case that's what you were thinking, which I doubt. You
and I both know he's probably one of the most saintly men who have walked
this earth, let alone among those who have held that office in Rome.
And Nero was undoubtedly a saintly man too. Gotta love Rome and all
the history it holds.
If Babylon still existed, it would have nothing on the new Roman
Empire.
- C
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
