"Cuan" <an@nymous.co.za> schreef in bericht
news:q0brj0lfkeal7n9rgh0l404k3atq4ncdhi@4ax.com...

Hi Jean! :-)

Since you and Barbarossa have been debating this issue, I thought I
might throw a bit more information into the mud-pit. This is directly
tied into the origins of the Venetian Black Nobility, and also serves
to explain exactly why Israel has had such profound support, even
though it launched a volley of missiles into a crowded sports field to
massacre a whole bunch of Palestinians again.

For other CT articles, there's some other stuff on my blog - for
anyone who might actually want to contribute anything constructive
(ie: Barbarossa et al).

http://conspiracy101.blogspot.com/

===
Excerpt from: http://www.geocities.com/proutyuk/deejay_2002

SOME JEWISH HISTORY


Semitism or anti-Semitism and the Jews have almost nothing in common.

WHAT!!

Don't swallow what the mostly "Jewish" mass media is telling
(dictating) you. Get yourself some history books and the
"Encyclopaedia Judaica", for instance, and get your knowledge yourself
through your own research. Des Griffin has done tremendous research
for his book "Anti-Semitism and the Babylonian Connection".

It's an absolute fact that "The Protocols.....", as we know them
today, are based on "Jewish" writings. Proof of this can be found in
one of the oldest books in the world, which has been sold millions and
millions of times and cannot be taken away from the public anymore -
The Jewis Talmud. Don't believe? Read and compare yourself.

More important than who precisely authored them is, that both, Talmud
and Protocols, are applied today.

As a result of an unrelenting avalanche of Zionist propaganda, the
vast majority of the people of the world have been misled into
believing that the word Semite refers almost exclusively to the people
who today are known as "Jews".

In fact, few things could be further from the truth.

The words "Semite", "Semitism" and "anti-Semitism" do not even appear
in the 1828 edition of Noah Webster's Dictionary of the English
language. They were coined only towards the end of the 19th century.

So, who are the "Semites" then?

The Semites, according to the authorative Oxford Universal
Dictionairy, 1944 (p.1838), are the people belonging to the race of
mankind which includes most of the peoples mentioned in Genesis 10 as
descended from Shem, son of Noah, as the Arabs, the Hebrews, Assyrians
and Arameans, and speaking a Semetic language as their native tongue.

Most people in the world however, would answer the question whether
the modern Jew is of Hebrew or Semitic origin with a clear "yes"!
False! This is simply not true. The so-called Jews in modern society
have nothing to do with the ancient Hebrews of biblical times, and for
decades we never thought of even questioning this basic assumption. It
is actually a historical fact that some 95 percent of modern Jewry are
not of Semetic stock. They are of TURKISH stock - the so-called
Khazars.

"The Jews of our times fall into two main divisions: Sephardim and
Ashkenazim. The Sephardim are the descendants of the Jews who since
antiquity have lived in Spain (Hebrew: Sepharad) untill they were
expelled at the end of the fifteenth century. In the 1960's, the
number of Sephardim was estimated at 500,000. The Ashkenazim or Khazar
Jews at the same time numbered about 11 million."

"The Khazars came not from Jordan, but from the Volga, not from
Canaan, but from the Caucasus. Geneticly they are more related to the
Hun, Uigur and Magyar than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
The story of the Khazar Empire, as it slowly emerges from the past,
begins to look like the most cruel hoax that history has ever
perpetrated...."
(Arthur Koestler, "The Thirteenth Tribe")

The Jewish Encyclopaedia tells us about the Khazars/Chazars:

Chazars: A people of TURKISH origin whose life and history are
interwoven with the very beginning of the history of the Jews in
Russia. ....driven on by the nomadic tribes of the steppes and by
their own desire for plunder and revenge. In the second half of the
sixth century the Chazars moved westwards ....the kingdom of the
Chazars was firmly established in most of southern Russia long before
the foundation of the Russian monarchy by the Vangarians (855 AD)
....At this time the kingdom of the Chazars stood of the height of its
power and was constantly at war. At the end of the eighth
century...the chagan (king) of the Chazars and his grandees, together
with a large number of his heathen people, embraced the Jewish
religion. (Having the Christians to their left and the Muslims to
their right they were asked [ordered] to join either one of those
religions, but the Chagan out of protest [yeah right] chose the Jewish
religion).

The Jewish population of the entire domain of the Chazars, in the
period between the seventh and the eighth century, must have been
substantial. About the ninth century it appears as if all the Chazars
were Jews and that they had been converted to Judaism only a short
time before. It was one of the successors of Bulan named Obadiah, who
regenerated the kingdom and strengthened the Jewish religion. He
invited Jewish scholars to settle in his domain and founded synagogues
and schools. The people were instructed in the Bible, Mishnah and the
Talmud and the divine service of the hazzanim.... In their writings
the Chazars used the Hebrew letters.... the Chazars language
predominated....

The Russian Vangarians established themselves at Kiev.... until the
final conquest of the Chazars by the Russians after a hard fight. Four
years later the Russians conquered all the Chazarian territory east of
the Azov river. Many members of the Chazarian royal family emigrated
to Spain.... Some went to Hungary, but the great mass of people
remained in their native country. (Jewish Encyclopaedia, Volume IV,
article on the Chazars.)


After Obadiah came a long succession of chagans (kings), for according
to a fundamental law of the state only 'Jewish' rulers were, and are,
permitted to ascend the throne.

So, we glean from stricly 'Jewish' sources that the vast majority of
present day 'Jews' cannot claim to be descendents of the original
Hebrews, and possibly heirs to Palestine. Because of that fact,
interestingly, the term "anti-Semitism" does not refer to the modern
'Jew'.

We are looking here at one of the most cunning ploys ever perpetrated
on human kind.

Benjamin Freedman, a Jew(?) who was on a first name basis with most of
the top Zionists (Zionists are NOT jews remember) in the 30's and
40's, puts his finger firmly on the true purpose behind the use of the
term "anti-Semitism". He declares: ... it should be eliminated from
the English language. "Anti-Semitism" serves only one purpose today.
It is used as a smear word. When so-called Jews feel that anyone
opposes any of their objectives, they discredit their victims by
applying the word "anti-Semite" or "anti-Semitic" through all the
channels they have at their command and under their control. ("Facts
are Facts", Benjamin Freedman)

[And since the majority of all media worldwide is run by 'Jews',
controlling public opinion is a breeze]

The most widely known and powerful Khazar family is the Rothschild
Family, who are named after the red shield that is the symbol of the
Khazars. The Rothschilds therefore, aren't Jews at all. Which isn't
surprising for Zionists aren't Jews either.

Same goes for most (practically all) of modern 'Jewry'. They are not
what we are being told they are, they're just called that way.

Keep in mind that, because the modern 'Jews' are not of Hebrew origin,
they never had and never will have a right for claiming the land of
Palestine (Sion). The State of Israel is absolutely illegal, even if
the 'Jews' would have some Hebrew origin.

To bring it down to the point: - Remember: when you are a 'Jew' you do
not belong to a race, you 'belong' to a religion, better said: an
ideology. Just like Catholics do not exist as a race, they 'belong' to
a religion; an ideology. Ever heard of the Catholic race? Me neither.
Does that mean 'Jews' do not exist as a race all together? Not
entirely. It's like being an American, you're not. The majority of
Americans are of European stock, except for the few actual Americans
left - the 'race' with the most "anti-Semetic" attitude is probably
the modern 'Jew' himself. Why?

The 'Jews' hate and fight the Arabs who REALLY are of Semetic stock
whenever and wherever they can. Therefore the Arabs are ANTI-KHAZAR
(which is a different thing all together) or "anti-Jewish", and the
'Jews' turn out to be the ones who are in fact "anti-Semetic".

Truth stranger than fiction?

Consider this:

If the 'Jews' are "Jewish" by belief and their "belief" is the Talmud
- Judaism - wouldn't they be upset to learn that the racial
"anti-semitism" doctrines of the Talmud actually apply to
THEMSELVES!!! [...]

Thank you for posting this! I shall study this some more with help from
the internet. When I read a history book ones about the history of
Greece the author declared that the first Greeks were Pelasgians who
came from the east and southeast and the author specifically said that
these Pelasgians had semitic ancestry! Interesting right?

Kind Regards,
Barbarossa

Cuan a écrit:

Hi Jean! :-)

Since you and Barbarossa have been debating this issue, I thought I
might throw a bit more information into the mud-pit. This is directly
tied into the origins of the Venetian Black Nobility, and also serves
to explain exactly why Israel has had such profound support, even
though it launched a volley of missiles into a crowded sports field to
massacre a whole bunch of Palestinians again.

For other CT articles, there's some other stuff on my blog - for
anyone who might actually want to contribute anything constructive
(ie: Barbarossa et al).

http://conspiracy101.blogspot.com/

===
Excerpt from: http://www.geocities.com/proutyuk/deejay_2002

SOME JEWISH HISTORY


Semitism or anti-Semitism and the Jews have almost nothing in common.

WHAT!!

Don't swallow what the mostly "Jewish" mass media is telling
(dictating) you. Get yourself some history books and the
"Encyclopaedia Judaica", for instance, and get your knowledge yourself
through your own research. Des Griffin has done tremendous research
for his book "Anti-Semitism and the Babylonian Connection".

It's an absolute fact that "The Protocols.....", as we know them
today, are based on "Jewish" writings.

It doesn't change the fact that the protocols of ion are recognized to
be a fraudulent anti-Semitic document made to justify the holocaust, nor
does it change the fact that the only recognized meaning of
anti-Semitism is the hate for jews.

Now your anti-semite site can kiss my *****, you can kiss my *****.