Quote Victor Zammit -
(retired) Lawyer of the High Court and Supreme Court of New South Wales,
Australia
" We, psychic investigators and empiricists, will pursue any avenue, we will
follow every legitimate lead, we will question, research, reason,
investigate all forms of energy, probe into phenomena hitherto unexamined or
unexplained, explore and examine anything, anywhere, anytime to discover the
truth - because truth - not faith will save us. "
========================================================
Skeptics are (un-aware) Regular-Medicine-Fundamentalists ?
( And we blame the Muslims ?)
EUROPE, The Netherlands, 10 may 2005
By Frank Eeken bc.
[A free-lance writer. Just a concerned citizen. A simple soul]
What the Skeptics are very good at, is criticising others /
Alternative-Medicine (AM). A negative attitude, towards life and reality,
which might influence e.g. scientific-results,-outcomes in an un-aware,
sub-consciuous way (see PEAR), without Regular-Medicine(RM) self-reflection,
with which they bother and SPAM millions and millions of people. My few
writings/Emails are just a drip in, and compared to, their
mass-network-bucket poored in the world's (psychical) ocean. Because the
Skeptical words do find a way to mass-media and the positive-results, proof
and evidence of AM do not, which publicity-choice-difference and -exposure
strangely and funny enough some 'believe', and seems, to be the only
difference between so-called scientific-evidence and non-sense.
Media-dictatorship in our 'so-called' precious Democracy for which, and
out-off, many wars are 'believed' to be fought!
The pre-justice of the Skeptics can be shown in the fact that psychology and
psychologists, which are well-represented within the Skeptical-organizations
around the world, are widely accepted, used and promoted including their
treatments, despite reality that these treatments are not scientific at all.
In otherwords "Psychologists using quack, fraudulent methodology bases"
(source - see text under the enclosures - by retired Lawyer of the High
Court and Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia - Victor Zammit). This
attitude and preference, for 'some kind' of fellow-humans who underline the
Skeptic-'believe', is in my opinion not at all in line with human-rights,
international standards, -goals and reality. The
"equalilty-treatment-principle" which is the core of our 'so-called'
precious Democracy.
The Skeptics say that AM must show that their treatments are working,
healing and curing. Even better, the Skeptics preach, without scientific
back-up, that they have already concluded that AM / the Paranormal is
not-working and/or it does not exist. And if thousands of AM-visitors, even
thus a Lawyer, and RM-practitioners who research, proof and practise AM /
the Paranormal, claim that AM / the paranormal is working, healing and
curing, than the Skeptics already know almost certain presumptively that
these people are lying, frauds and fools.
From this nonsensical reasoning it is very clear that these few Skeptics
compared to mass AM-population, are dogmatic, and maybe even
Regular-Medicine-fundamentalistic-all-means-are-allowed, believers who will
never change and be brought to different thinking, minds by e.g.
international scientific evidence or statements from thousands of
AM-fellow-humans, which the Skeptics might 'believe' is critical rational
thinking, but which I call deny-ignoring-behaviour out of ego, incapability,
not-willing or not knowing how to cope with people who think differently.
Reality ! It is of no use and a waste of time to produce more AM-evidence,
if the present already available AM-evidence is not seen, not heard, ignored
of not understood by these few but Media-dictating Skeptics, at the cost of
millions of people who could benefit (in Euro's and less suffering) more
from AM if a more positive- and research-approach, in and out of personal
resonsibility and liability, was choosen.
If the Skeptics are in the opinion that there is no solid evidence needed,
to show that AM is not-working, as they preach, than this discussion is
meaningless and redundant at the cost off....., because it is obvious that
it is about believe-conviction which cannot be scientificly supported.
Naturally the Skeptics can believe what they want, but it is unrealistic to
take it ill or blame an AM-population-group, when they / the majority of
people ("About 70 % of older adults use Alternative Medicine" #) do not
believe this minority Skeptical conservative way of thinking. The hearing
deaf and seeing blind (for a personal reason). The Passion of the Un-aware !
(of Christ's intentions).
I thought that a majority of people had decisive-input in policy, in our
'so-called' precious Democray, and not a few who still 'think' like 'Earth
is flat' and are un-able to be in touch with feelable fellow-human-reality.
Obviously I am wrong, and in case figures as misleading, I think all people,
and not just a 'selective group', should be heard and listened to in our
'so-called' precious Democrazy !
With kind regards,
Frank Eeken
# " About 70 % of older adults use alternative medicine " (9 April 2005 )
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-04/osu-a7p040605.php
ENCLOSURES / APPENDIXES
AM-Evidence
(1) Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR)
In case of serious interest I would like to refer to the Princeton
Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) laboratory at Princeton University.
They have been studying the effects of human intention and emotional
resonance on the behavior of random physical processes for over a quarter of
a century. Their program is open and offers additional (beside enclosures
and earlier stated) evidence supporting the legitimacy of the paranormal
phenomena. The research-information, details of their various experiments in
anomalous human/machine interactions and precognitive-remote-perception, as
well as several conceptual models that attempt to accommodate these
phenomena within a scholarly framework, in more than two dozen papers, is
freely available to anyone and can be accessed and downloaded from the
Publications page of their website
< http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/ >. In particular, attention should be
payed to the article entitled " Information, Consciousness, and Health," -
http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/JahnATpages.pdf which appeared in Alternative
Therapies, 2, No. 3, pp. 32-38, 1996, and a more recent theoretical paper
entitled "A Modular Model of Mind/Matter Manifestations (M5),"
http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/m5.pdf which was published in the Journal of
Scientific Exploration, 15, No. 3, pp. 299-329, 2001.
(2) Foto-prove of the existence of 'another world', "souls of deceased,
which are everywhere". "This is only the beginning", "It would be a crime
not to share this information".
http://home.hetnet.nl/~lichtbol3/Robbert-Alienpics/robbert-alienpics-eng.htm
(3) Dutch NDE Study Attracts Worldwide Attention
by Jeffrey Long, MD & Paul Bernstein, PhD. - Originally published in 'Vital
Signs', the quarterly newsletter of the International Association for
Near-Death Studies, Issue #1 of 2002 - www.iands.org - "..(...)...Our
results show that medical factors cannot account for the occurrence of NDE.
All patients had a cardiac arrest, and were clinically dead with
unconsciousness resulting from insufficient blood supply to the brain..(...)
"
To read the full Lancet article and its accompanying Commentary, you may
visit the website, register there for free, and search for the keywords
"near death". The article's title is, Near-death experience in survivors of
cardiac arrest: a prospective study in the Netherlands, to be cited as
Lancet 2001; 358: 2039-45. Its authors, in addition to Dr. van Lommel, are
Ruud van Wees, Vincent Meyers, and Ingrid Elfferich.
(4) Scientific Research Confirms Distant Healing (Cynthia Sue Larson, 8 aug
2000)
http://realityshifters.com/pages/articles/researchconfirmsdh.html
from Dutch biological-agriculture-based magazine Vruchtbare Aarde
( http://www.vruchtbareaarde.nl/receptie.html )
(5) "Bernard Grad of the McGill Universiteit in Montreal has done scientific
research in the '60 in the area of non-local medicine. Grads results justify
the presumption that our emotions have a positive or negative influence on
the healingproces and that material, such as water, can transfer these
influences. Perhaps because they absorbe the state of mind of people,
through a not yet scientificly defined mechanisme"
(6) "Dr. E.Targ, from the medical faculty of the University of Californie
and director Psychosociaal Oncological research and H. S. Smith, director of
the Geraldine Brush Institute for cancerresearch and colleges of the Pacific
Center in San Francisco tried to establish whether healing-intentions
(prayer) from distance could have a therapeutical effect in cases of
sicknesses as aids, if the patients themself did not know whether they were
treated or not, by dubbelblind research. Eventualy there was no difference
found in the amount of immunecels (type CD4), but a blind evaluation of all
statusses did bring other significant differences to light. The patients
whom were treated with non-local-healing had less new significant with aids
associated illnesses. The injuries from which they were already suffering
were less serious. They visited less frequently there doktor and were less
admitted in hospitals and had been laying less days in hospital. Furthermore
it showed that the mood of the treated patients were significantly better
than those of the patienst in the controle-group".
(7) "Research by Dr. Mitchell W. Krucoff, senior staff Interventional
Cardiologist at Duke University Medical Center and director of the
Catheterization Laboratory at the Durham VA Medical Center, and doktor-nurse
Suzanne Crater, who coordinate a therpapy programme existing of a
combination of cadiology, prayer-healing, music, visualization-exersises and
hand-laying. Because of an article about this research in Time-Magazine in
1998 it stood on the foreground of public intrest. Krucoff, professor commen
medicine and cardiology at the medical faculty of the Duke University and
director reseach heart-diseases of the Durham VA Hospital, researched the
possible effect of healing-intentions (prayer) on patients whom had
heart-surgery. The amount of patients was to limited to draw statistical
justified conclusions, but the results were intresting enough to expand the
reaseach to 1500 patients".
(8) Larry Dossey, M.D., is executive editor of Alternative Therapies in
Health and Medicine. He is the author of nine books on the role of
consciousness and spirituality in medicine.
"A workingstudent Emily Jaeger was studying in her room, at a moment that
many people normaly read their newspaper. Suddenly she had the thought "You
are dying". She couldn't do anything with that thought. She was in good
health and felt fine. But the tide turned and she couldn't do anything
anymore, no more energy, difficulty with breathing and no control of her
legs. She started to pray and she kept on going until she felt fine and free
again. When she came at the office the next day, het colleges behaved as if
they had seen a ghost. They told her, that the previous day they had seen
her name in a death-notification in the newspaper. She found out that many
people she knew, were in the presumption that de notification was about her.
"I realised that I was unawarely been paralized by the thoughts of the
people who had assumed that I was the woman who's name was in the
notification". Her worldly view left enough space for non-local phenomenon
If she had gone to a regular doktor who had no knowledge of
healing-intentions and had complained about lack of energy, breathing
difficulty and unable to move her legs, she would have surely been sent to a
psychiatrist or have been prescribed medication 'to get herself under
controle'."
Dossey has a web page that describes some of the recent medical studies that
have been strongly indicating that distant healing is definitely taking
place when people are prayed for.
http://www.dosseydossey.com/larry/QnA.html
(9) Larry Dossey, where Epoch-I = the fysical orientated approach:
"I have come to the conclusion that the essential ingredient is 'love'. A
condition of compasion which is so authentic and so deep that is goes
through all barrieres that we pull up around us. In a hospital I presented
evidence, from many controlled scientific experiments to show that there is
a clear link between the non-local Epoch-III-applications
(healingintentions, prayer) and positive results in healthcare. How does a
hospital justify, beside all the high-tech possibilities, to not let
patients have access to the applications offered by Epoch-II (after
WorldWarII, hypnoses, visualisation, relaxation and the enormous
signification of psychological factors on diseases and health) and Epoch-III
.. Is it ethical responsible to let out the efforts of which the value is
clearly shown ? Howlong must we wait ? "
(10) "One of the most ambitious research talked about at the
Harvard-meetings, was a longterm experiment under supervision of dr. Herbert
Benson of the Mind Body medical Institute of the New England Deaconess
Hospital in Boston. Benson enjoys a reputation in U.S.A. cause of his
research on local-effects of meditation and prayer. He is researching the
possible non-local-effects. His research surrounded 1200 patients, which had
a bypass-operation. Only the fact that under the auspicien of
'Harvard-research', reeearch was done on the effects of non-local-healing,
says it all. The fact that this kind of research presently is being carried
out at top-institutions, under controle of respected scientists, has
contributed many in the United States of taking away the psychological and
scientific resistance against it ".
(see also - http://www.mbmi.org/ )
(11) "It is not been noticied but the American government had financed
research between 1973 and 1989 and lateron between 1992 and 1994 to research
the possibilities to acquire information through 'mental' way of far away
objects or even future events. On request of the American Congres the
American professor statistics, dr.Jessica Utts of the University of
Californie, carefully examined the research in 1996. Her conclusion was
that, in light of the demands handled by current science, the existence of
these phenomenon may be accounted for as proven. Maybe, says Utts, we can
imagine it as a sixth sense, as our known senses reacts on changes. 'A sort
of phsychic sense that is scanning the future on important changes, as our
eyes are focussed on changes in our view and our ears on sudden change in
sound'. According to Utts, is is a waste of time, to continue this kind of
reaearch, if it is only meant to find even more evidence. 'There is few
expectations of continuesly handing over evidence, for those who are not
willing to accept the presently available data'."
(see also - http://www-stat.ucdavis.edu/users/utts/
http://anson.ucdavis.edu/~utts }
============================================
A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife -- by Victor Zammit
(retired) Lawyer of the High Court and Supreme Court of New South Wales,
Australia
Irrefutable Objective Evidence
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html
$1 Million Challenge To Disprove Evidence Of Life After Death
http://www.victorzammit.com/skeptics/challenge.html
================================================
Psychologists using quack, fraudulent methodology
Psychologists do not understand (ie, are ignorant) what technically
constitutes admissible evidence. They tend to confuse psi elicited
admissible evidence with 'anecdotal' evidence. For your appendix see your
surgeon. For crime see a cop. For evidence you see a lawyer.
Enemies of the PSI empiricism:
Published in PSYCHIC WORLD Jan 2002
Psychology & the closed minded psychologists
By Victor Zammit - empirical psychic investigator,
Lawyer of the High Court and Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia
(retired).
So, some negatively minded psychologists are trying to willfully denigrate
empirical psi claiming psi is 'not scientific'? There is a noticeable
consistent activity within some psychology departments to unfairly and
unreasonably attack empirical psychic phenomena. It is on record that there
are those anti-psychic crusader psychologists, who, for career promotion or
other selfish motives, have used illegitimate means to try to undermine the
acceptance of empirical objective evidence of psychic phenomena (psi).
In response to the continuous provocations from these few closed minded
skeptic materialist psychologists in leadership positions, the time has come
to have a very close look at the validity of traditional university
psychology. A stand has to be taken against the unreasonableness of these
closed-minded psychologists who deceitfully and knowingly are not using the
same tests of validity they use for their own psychology experiments.
They come across as prosecutors in their psychic investigations using a
presumption of fraud, and seem determined that the objective evidence for
psychic phenomena must not be accepted. Psychology fought very hard to
establish itself as pseudo-science and is in a really precarious position -
it could disappear as a discipline. It is no wonder that some psychologists
are fighting hard publicly to denounce, reject, refute even trying to
ridicule psychic phenomena - something they do not want to understand yet
something which is threatening the very existence of traditional psychology.
There have been dramatic empirical psi positive findings by some of the most
brilliant men and women who ever walked this planet earth- eg Dr Dean Radin,
Prof Gary Schwartz and many physicists, psychiatrists, MD's and so many
others.
By and large, in Western universities judging by the contemporary American
textbooks, the core subjects for psychology are generally similar: classical
works about personality, neuroscience, perception, learning, introspective
concepts etc with emphasis on comparative theories. In practical work, the
laboratory research usually entails duplicating Pavlov, Skinner's schedules
of reinforcement and other experiments.
Why are psychology departments most hostile to psychic phenomena? This is
probably because scientific findings in psychic phenomena will fundamentally
invalidate the whole known field of psychology particularly Freud, Jungian,
Behaviourism and other theories of learning perceived to be 'untouchable'
and which are all mostly unscientific. Most of psychology will have to be
re-learned when successful scientific psychic experiments conducted
privately inevitably become also accepted at universities.
The discovery of non-physical energy-force will inevitably revolutionise
traditional science and will make nugatory most of existing 'knowledge' in
psychology.
Psychology itself is not a pedigree subject. It is a conglomerate made up
from bits and pieces psychology 'stole' from different disciplines including
physics, medicine, biology, physiology, neurology, philosophy, statistics,
physical science, scientific methodology, hypnosis, sociology, anthropology
and religion - see below. Without these said collective disciplines there is
no psychology at universities.
Society knows, psychologists and psychics know too that traditional
psychology has come to a dead end. A large number of psychologists who have
accepted psychic/spiritual phenomena have decided to break away from the
mainstream psychology and formed Transpersonal Psychology - which allows for
the laws of psychic - non-physical energy - and spiritual experience to
complement traditional psychology. It also allows the promotion of spiritual
therapies, ecology, philosophy and the arts and sciences. Their future is
guaranteed as inevitably the psychic/spiritual laws will one day become
dominant at universities.
Two reasons why materialist psychology continues to dominate universities
are because it does not contradict existing materialist knowledge and it
denies spirituality.
At universities during a psychology lecture on operant conditioning
psychology students are told that love is nothing more than just massive
continuous positive reinforcement - a rather materialistic, reductionist,
mechanistic erroneous view of the most important and powerful force known in
the universe.
Secondly, psychology promotes materialism - as distinct from fulfilling a
function which psychology was originally created: to assist society in its
enormous social and other problems - all these problems, suicide, drug
addiction, alcoholism, crime, depression, have been getting worse since
psychology became a formal discipline. In ALL these aforementioned phenomena
psychology - because psychology is NOT scientific -miserably has very sadly
failed.
Psychologists using quack, fraudulent methodology
A self confessed anti-psychic who was a leading British Professor (of
Psychology) belonged to a group which allegedly 'scientifically' examined
psychic phenomena - the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims
of the Paranormal (CSICOP) in the 70's.
This anti-psychic Professor of Psychology tried to denigrate and destroy the
high credibility of the Professor J.B. Rhine's, ESP Pratt-Pearce experiments
when experts hostile to the psychic phenomena in the U.S. were satisfied
with the scientific method used by Dr Rhine and never raised the issue of
fraud.
Using verbal sleight of hand - without having examined the ESP experiments,
without using scientific method, without objectivity whatsoever, without a
shred of evidence - this professor stated that, 'since ESP is not possible,
fraud must have taken place.'!
This kind of quack 'psychology method' being used by some materialist closed
minded psychologists shows how the "impossible-to-pass test" being used on
psychic phenomena was not being used to test 'established' principles
psychologists swear by.
On the other hand psychologists are using a lower threshold of proof. It is
known that psychologists have used principles on to the public if their
experimental results yielded a probability of one in twenty of it being
right. Perhaps this accounts for the delay - sometimes years - before
patients experience some cure.
One has to keep in mind that science does NOT support the validity of
applied psychological principles being used on humans even to-day.
In a court session, if this Professor of Psychology tried to argue the way
he did he would indubitably be told by a senior judge something like:
"But Professor, this is not a kindergarten debate here. The rules of
evidence are very clear. The rules of evidence will not permit you to enter
into evidence personal opinion unless they were substantiated by some
independent or objective means ... "
Another most memorable highly unfairly and negatively prejudicial statement
made by closed minded Professor of Psychology at Harvard, Hugo Muenstenberg,
set the policy for materialist psychology. When he went to see Edgar Cayce,
one of the greatest psychics not only the United States, but this world has
ever seen, he announced: "Edgar Cayce, I came here to expose you."
BEFORE he had done any investigations, he had publicly stated that he did
not believe in communication between intelligences from the afterlife
violating every rule in scientific method, "... it does not exist and will
not exist." Would you call this Professor of psychology a 'scientist'? Of
course not - no wonder, scientists deny psychology is a 'science.'!
What is most unfair, unreasonable and most cowardly is that these kinds of
illogical and unscientific psychologists are in Britain given free reign on
television, radio and newspapers but no reasonable time is given to the
empirical psi researchers to the articulate their argument. In Australia and
the USA the argument appears to be more balanced.
As a matter of fact, privately funded programs are being shown on television
demonstrating psychic phenomena by highly gifted psychics such as John
Edward where some of his 'hits' show that the mathematical probability of
the information being obtained by chance has been calculated by
statisticians to be 1 in 3 trillions. Translated, this means that the
information being obtained by this gifted psychic has to come from where
this medium states it is coming from - the afterlife!
A critical issue is also that at universities the negative attitude of
presumption of invalidity is not being applied to psychology itself. If the
universities did, there would be very little pure psychology around - if
any.
Psychology is NOT scientific
Borrowing a page from the aggressive techniques used by those closed-minded
materialist psychologists and other skeptics who are using psychology or
"parapsychology" to try to belittle, denigrate and ridicule psychic
phenomena this is how psychics and society ought to see psychology. The gist
of the argument is that psychology in the strictest terms is NOT scientific!
Just some problems of psychology:
.. All introspective psychology including Freudian and Jungian is totally one
hundred percent UNSCIENTIFIC. This is already 50% of psychology.
.. The UNSIENTIFIC 'process' of psychoanalysis has shown itself to be
unreliable, highly expensive, ineffective and irrelevant to health even
after years of treatment.
.. Psychology has not been able to develop a reliable cure for depression -
in many instances, psychotherapy has deepened depression - because
psychology is NOT scientific.
.. Psychiatry using psychological techniques has failed to guarantee mental
health.
.. Psychiatry has now virtually dumped psychology and switched to drug
therapy.
.. The psychological technique of Razran (aversion therapy) was a complete
disaster maiming many patients - was totally UNSCIENTIFIC.
.. Shock therapy by psychologists is still being used notwithstanding its
treatment is harmful, inefficient and ineffective - and unscientific.
.. Psychotherapy in many instances has prolonged the patient's problems.
.. Applied Skinnerian Schedules of Reinforcement failed miserably in the U.S
Army war machine and in psychiatric hospitals.
.. Psychological principles of incentives proved irrelevant in psychiatric
hospitals - bordering on quackery where some patients become more depressed.
.. Behaviourism has shown to be effective in dealing with laboratory rats but
has not convincingly transferred to human behaviour.
.. Most of classical and operant conditioning have shown to be marginal if at
all relevant.
.. Brain functioning experiments are the strict jurisdiction of biologists,
and physiologists. Psychologists 'stole' the brain functioning from biology.
.. Medical science has shown that psychology is fundamentally incorrect in
assuming that the mind and the brain are one - huge parts of the brain have
been removed and patients can still perform efficient cognitive and manual
functions.
.. Psychologists are doing the work of sociologists in social experiments.
.. Cheating and fraud have been discovered in psychology eg. in the famous
twin studies.
.. The courts have accepted that psychology is not objective (scientific)
because the courts allowed for multiple interpretations of the same event.
If psychology were scientific there would be only ONE interpretation.
.. Psychology has failed to effect fundamental behavioural changes in
prisons - inmates perceiving it as 'quackery.'
The latest craze in psychology - phenomenology is 100% subjective, ie NOT
SCIENTIFIC - it would be a waste of time, money and energy - AND CHEATING to
call phenomenology 'scientific!'
.. Stripped from all its encroached disciplines - medicine, physics, physical
science etc, what left in psychology is nothing but formalised 'common
sense.'
.. Biological desensitisation in psychology is a steal from pure Buddhist
meditation.
.. Psychology has failed to effect solutions to modify human behaviour on a
big picture scale - the way other disciplines have. Psychology has failed to
reduce the huge problems in society of suicides (around 40 to 50,000 a year
in the U.S.), alcohol addiction, drugs, crime and other serious problems of
growing alienation. All these problems are on the increase - if psychology
were a science the world would get positive results - not continuous
exacerbation of these problems!
Consistently, closed minded skeptic psychologists do not take into account
their own intrinsic negativity as a negative intervening variable which
inevitably distorts their results when they try to investigate psychic
phenomena. This has now been empirically validated - see 'the Experimenter
Effect'. Psychology has had more than generous funding considering it has
not produced results and considering psychology has come to a dead-end.
There have been no major breakthroughs in psychology in the last 20 years!
Psychology in fact has come to a dead end! The time has come for the
government, all politicians, bureaucracy and the taxpayers to review the
cost / benefit of further funding to psychology, Psychology has been changed
to actively promote materialism as distinct from fulfilling the original
function it was created for: to reduce the huge problems of society,
In context of the above, the submission is that the time has come for the
taxpayers to look very closely into the merits and demerits of psychology
and to fund any projects in psychology contingent on proven results. Funding
to psychology ought to be halved to allow the creation of departments of
psychic research from those who are non-materialistically competent and
genuine who can bring about the knowledge to revolutionise learning - a new
learning in all disciplines which WILL inexorably come about anyway.
One would have to be living in a vacuum not to notice that the leadership of
the psychic community and the spiritualist organisations do not have the
confidence in those crusading academic skeptic psychologists females and
males who have been funded by the strong anti-paranormal organisations on
the heinous and deceitful pretence that they are conducting psychic
experiments impartially.
The good news is that empirical psi is gaining acceptance by the 'new
science' - and it only when the non material energy-force is given more
funding that the revolution in science will really commence. Psychology as
abovestated, will undergo fundamental changes and will almost certain join
Transpersonal Psychology.
Source - Victor Zammit
http://www.victorzammit.com
--
WWW.DRTURI.COM
Telephone: 602-265-7667 - Fax: 602-265-8668
Astropsychology, Hypnotherapy, Cabalistic Healing, Motivational Speaker,
Author, Counselor.
Read NOW! http://www.drturi.com/commandments.html
Join our Forum: www.drturi.com/ubbthreads/logout.php?Cat=0
"Souls who take my self assurance and honesty for an oversized ego suffer a
form of inferiority complex."
-Dr.Turi
.
|
