The words of thousands of aviation professionals and air-crash
investigators, coupled with conclusive physical evidence from the wreckage
and corroborated by at least two similar CWT explosions happening to other
Boeing aircraft are tumped by a bunch of witnesses who know nothing about
aircraft on CNN and Tony's knee-jerk hatred for Clinton.
Let me know if I missed anything, Tony.
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Tony's position on TWA800 summed up |
08 Mar 2005 07:04:17 AM |
|
|
The words of thousands of aviation professionals and air-crash
investigators,
After they read what the Cliton Administration wanted them to read,
right?
coupled with conclusive physical evidence from the wreckage
Yeah, but let's just forget about the explosive residue found on the
seats, right?
and corroborated by at least two similar CWT explosions happening to other
Boeing aircraft
Where? When?
are tumped by a bunch of witnesses who know nothing about
aircraft
Military personel, pilots, etc.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Tony's position on TWA800 summed up |
08 Mar 2005 07:10:49 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110286987.7fcd0e655d5ab1b56293bae9094a67a4@teranews...
The words of thousands of aviation professionals and air-crash
investigators,
After they read what the Cliton Administration wanted them to read,
right?
What? the crash investigators, surpisingly, examined the wreckage rather
than just reading about it, you dumb mother-humping miscreant moron.
coupled with conclusive physical evidence from the wreckage
Yeah, but let's just forget about the explosive residue found on the
seats, right?
1) You mean Sander's seabed sediment sample, right?
2) Missiles don't generaly leave "explosive residue", they leave thousands
of shrapnel holes.
and corroborated by at least two similar CWT explosions happening to
other
Boeing aircraft
Where? When?
Are you really incapable of clicking a simple link, taht has lareday been
posted four time, dumbfuck?
http://www.blazetech.com/Software/BlazeTank/blazetank.html
are tumped by a bunch of witnesses who know nothing about
aircraft
Military personel, pilots, etc.
Non of whom claim to have seen a projectile.
So I didn't miss anything? Good
Excellent resource here:
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~philmil/ADA_FAQ/ADA_FAQ_twa800.htm
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Tony's position on TWA800 summed up |
08 Mar 2005 07:23:38 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110286987.7fcd0e655d5ab1b56293bae9094a67a4@teranews...
The words of thousands of aviation professionals and air-crash
investigators,
After they read what the Cliton Administration wanted them to read,
right?
What? the crash investigators, surpisingly, examined the wreckage rather
than just reading about it, you dumb mother-humping miscreant moron.
Thousands of them? Nope.
coupled with conclusive physical evidence from the wreckage
Yeah, but let's just forget about the explosive residue found on the
seats, right?
1) You mean Sander's seabed sediment sample, right?
2) Missiles don't generaly leave "explosive residue", they leave thousands
of shrapnel holes.
Nope, I mean the explosive residue found on two seats, that they later
tried to say was left from a training exercise. LOL, only problem was,
that plane was never used for such training.
Look it up if you want the truth.
and corroborated by at least two similar CWT explosions happening to
other
Boeing aircraft
Where? When?
Are you really incapable of clicking a simple link, taht has lareday been
posted four time, dumbfuck?
http://www.blazetech.com/Software/BlazeTank/blazetank.html
Wow, seems to me there was only one 747 and only one that happened
in the air, and guess what, they're the one and same TWA-800.
are tumped by a bunch of witnesses who know nothing about
aircraft
Military personel, pilots, etc.
Non of whom claim to have seen a projectile.
Wrong.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Tony's position on TWA800 summed up |
08 Mar 2005 07:31:22 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110288149.d91bfb1057e3a94e6765b05ba66ac54a@teranews...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110286987.7fcd0e655d5ab1b56293bae9094a67a4@teranews...
The words of thousands of aviation professionals and air-crash
investigators,
After they read what the Cliton Administration wanted them to read,
right?
What? the crash investigators, surpisingly, examined the wreckage rather
than just reading about it, you dumb mother-humping miscreant moron.
Thousands of them? Nope.
Yep, any idea hoa many people were involved in the TWA800 investigation?
Anyway, this still irrelevant.
coupled with conclusive physical evidence from the wreckage
Yeah, but let's just forget about the explosive residue found on the
seats, right?
1) You mean Sander's seabed sediment sample, right?
2) Missiles don't generaly leave "explosive residue", they leave
thousands
of shrapnel holes.
Nope, I mean the explosive residue found on two seats, that they later
tried to say was left from a training exercise. LOL, only problem was,
that plane was never used for such training.
Cite? And how does that affect point 2)?
Look it up if you want the truth.
Truth? From you? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
and corroborated by at least two similar CWT explosions happening to
other
Boeing aircraft
Where? When?
Are you really incapable of clicking a simple link, taht has lareday been
posted four time, dumbfuck?
http://www.blazetech.com/Software/BlazeTank/blazetank.html
Wow, seems to me
Ah, but you're a fucking imbecile, aren't you?
there was only one 747
Same design CWT (on a different scale) Another of your idiot assertions
bites the dust..CWT explosinos happen, they have been observed in the past.
Shoulder fired missiles that are still in boost phase ay 13,700 feet don't
exist. You lose
and only one that happened
in the air, and guess what, they're the one and same TWA-800.
Wrong, as usual
"Since 1959 there have been 17 fuel tank ignition events)" All except one of
them were Boeings too!
http://www.caasd.org/atsrac/FAA_PI-Engineer_Workshop/2002/SFAR-88-Related-Op
erating-Rules-and-Special-lMaintenance-Requirements.pdf
(note another 747 incident, in the air. CWT explosion caused by lightning
strike)
are tumped by a bunch of witnesses who know nothing about
aircraft
Military personel, pilots, etc.
Non of whom claim to have seen a projectile.
Wrong.
Nope, right. Got a quote from a witness that says otherwise? I've only asked
you about fifty times over the years.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Tony's position on TWA800 summed up |
08 Mar 2005 08:08:38 AM |
|
|
wrote:
How about AA587? You know; the plane that came down in Queens a month
after 9/11 - you were convinced it was sabotage. Did Bush cover that up?
HeHe, of course not, he's a Republican, only Liberals do that sort of
thing, right?
You're blessed with a kook-kwotient equivalent to *any* of the
reality-challenged contributors to this corner of nut-space. Ne'r mind
the politically self-serving swill re TWA800; other examples include...
Saddam = anti-Christ
WNV = Iraqi bio-weapon
Iraqi involvement in OKC bombing
Almost anything to do with WMD
Almost anything "published" by WorldNutDaily
Anthrax letters = Al Qaeda
90% of homosexuals were molested as children.
it goes on... and on... kook.
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Tony's position on TWA800 summed up |
08 Mar 2005 08:15:27 AM |
|
|
"Absolute Zero" <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d0kbdc$got$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
itwill@happen.com wrote:
How about AA587? You know; the plane that came down in Queens a month
after 9/11 - you were convinced it was sabotage. Did Bush cover that up?
Oooh.. good point. I imagine a lot of tumbleweed will blow by before Tont
answers that one though..
HeHe, of course not, he's a Republican, only Liberals do that sort of
thing, right?
You're blessed with a kook-kwotient equivalent to *any* of the
reality-challenged contributors to this corner of nut-space.
Absolutely. Zanowicz, Zack-owicz - Same *****, different buckets, same
bouquets.
Ne'r mind
the politically self-serving swill re TWA800; other examples include...
Saddam = anti-Christ
WNV = Iraqi bio-weapon
Iraqi involvement in OKC bombing
Almost anything to do with WMD
Almost anything "published" by WorldNutDaily
Anthrax letters = Al Qaeda
90% of homosexuals were molested as children.
it goes on... and on... kook.
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Tony's position on TWA800 summed up |
09 Mar 2005 09:40:55 AM |
|
|
"Absolute Zero" <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d0kbdc$got$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
itwill@happen.com wrote:
How about AA587? You know; the plane that came down in Queens a month
after 9/11 - you were convinced it was sabotage. Did Bush cover that up?
Oooh.. good point. I imagine a lot of tumbleweed will blow by before Tont
answers that one though..
Wow, Tommy Boy's wrong again.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Tony's position on TWA800 summed up |
09 Mar 2005 10:04:39 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110382784.5f517e50aec70dfcdb6d29399b38e8da@teranews...
"Absolute Zero" <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d0kbdc$got$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
itwill@happen.com wrote:
How about AA587? You know; the plane that came down in Queens a month
after 9/11 - you were convinced it was sabotage. Did Bush cover that
up?
Oooh.. good point. I imagine a lot of tumbleweed will blow by before Tont
answers that one though..
Wow, Tommy Boy's wrong again.
Wrong. Where's your answer?
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Tony's position on TWA800 summed up |
09 Mar 2005 09:40:05 AM |
|
|
itwill@happen.com wrote:
How about AA587? You know; the plane that came down in Queens a month
after 9/11 - you were convinced it was sabotage. Did Bush cover that up?
HeHe, of course not, he's a Republican, only Liberals do that sort of
thing, right?
Wrong.
If you go and search my post Mrs. Google, you will find that I have my
doubts about that incident.
You're blessed with a kook-kwotient equivalent to *any* of the
reality-challenged contributors to this corner of nut-space. Ne'r mind
the politically self-serving swill re TWA800; other examples include...
Saddam = anti-Christ
He's not dead yet, is he?
WNV = Iraqi bio-weapon
There were UN documents suggesting he was was working on such a
weapon.
Iraqi involvement in OKC bombing
There is evidence that Arabs were involved, why do you think they
rushed McVeigh off to his death? When is anyone ever put to death
that quickly?
Anthrax letters = Al Qaeda
Do they know who did it? Nope. Were they not coordinated with 9-11?
Yep.
The kooks are you and many others here as well, the ones who always
blame America first.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Tony's position on TWA800 summed up |
09 Mar 2005 10:13:23 AM |
|
|
wrote:
wrote:
How about AA587? You know; the plane that came down in Queens a month
after 9/11 - you were convinced it was sabotage. Did Bush cover that up?
HeHe, of course not, he's a Republican, only Liberals do that sort of
thing, right?
Wrong.
If you go and search my post Mrs. Google, you will find that I have my
doubts about that incident.
....and I called it as an accident on the day [against the widespread
assumption of sabotage].
So you're trapped... Bush = Clinton HAHAHAHAHAHA
This is what is known as a win, win situation [for me].
You're blessed with a kook-kwotient equivalent to *any* of the
reality-challenged contributors to this corner of nut-space. Ne'r mind
the politically self-serving swill re TWA800; other examples include...
Saddam = anti-Christ
He's not dead yet, is he?
No, and neither is he the anti-Christ, you doofus.
WNV = Iraqi bio-weapon
There were UN documents suggesting he was was working on such a
weapon.
The UN??? Jeeze, you'll be hiring an ACLU lawyer next.
Iraqi involvement in OKC bombing
There is evidence that Arabs were involved, why do you think they
rushed McVeigh off to his death? When is anyone ever put to death
that quickly?
There's always "evidence" for kook theories.
Anthrax letters = Al Qaeda
Do they know who did it? Nope.
They, at the highest levels, probably do.
Were they not coordinated with 9-11? Yep.
You claimed that one of the letters was mailed before 9/11 - that is
kook *****. Do want me to prove it again?
Okay braindead, so where did al Qaeda stash the highly sophisticated
anthrax refining equipment that was used between the two different waves
of mailings, eh?
The kooks are you and many others here as well, the ones who always
blame America first.
LOLOLOLOL
The mark of a kook is they see Gov't conspiracy when none exists. You
are just as much of a kook as Zak when it suits your agenda.
Blame America first? What are you talking about, *****-for-brains? You
blame Clinton for odd socks.
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Tony's position on TWA800 summed up |
10 Mar 2005 06:20:41 AM |
|
|
"Absolute Zero" <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d0n734$90s$4@news8.svr.pol.co.uk...
itwill@happen.com wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
How about AA587? You know; the plane that came down in Queens a month
after 9/11 - you were convinced it was sabotage. Did Bush cover that up?
HeHe, of course not, he's a Republican, only Liberals do that sort of
thing, right?
Wrong.
If you go and search my post Mrs. Google, you will find that I have my
doubts about that incident.
...and I called it as an accident on the day [against the widespread
assumption of sabotage].
So you're trapped... Bush = Clinton HAHAHAHAHAHA
This is what is known as a win, win situation [for me].
You're blessed with a kook-kwotient equivalent to *any* of the
reality-challenged contributors to this corner of nut-space. Ne'r mind
the politically self-serving swill re TWA800; other examples include...
Saddam = anti-Christ
He's not dead yet, is he?
No, and neither is he the anti-Christ, you doofus.
WNV = Iraqi bio-weapon
There were UN documents suggesting he was was working on such a
weapon.
The UN??? Jeeze, you'll be hiring an ACLU lawyer next.
Iraqi involvement in OKC bombing
There is evidence that Arabs were involved, why do you think they
rushed McVeigh off to his death? When is anyone ever put to death
that quickly?
There's always "evidence" for kook theories.
Anthrax letters = Al Qaeda
Do they know who did it? Nope.
They, at the highest levels, probably do.
Were they not coordinated with 9-11? Yep.
You claimed that one of the letters was mailed before 9/11 - that is
kook *****. Do want me to prove it again?
Okay braindead, so where did al Qaeda stash the highly sophisticated
anthrax refining equipment that was used between the two different waves
of mailings, eh?
The kooks are you and many others here as well, the ones who always
blame America first.
LOLOLOLOL
The mark of a kook is they see Gov't conspiracy when none exists. You
are just as much of a kook as Zak when it suits your agenda.
Blame America first? What are you talking about, *****-for-brains? You
blame Clinton for odd socks.
-A
Poor Tony.. it really is almost too easy.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
