leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au wrote:

shastaman@my-deja.com wrote:

Per N. via Peter:

When Mabus shortly dies, there shall ensue
Of man and beast a laying waste most dread.
Then suddenly shall vengeance heave in view:
Thirst, famine, blood, with comet overhead.

*shrug*

S~

I always wonder why the fascination of C2Q62 clearly no Comet of any
significance and a race to identify the mabus character.

since when does verse 4 have to occur at the same time or only relate
precisely to verse 1?

seems verse 3 and 4 follow 1 and 2

C II -Q62 Mabus puis alors mourra, viendra
De gens et bestes vne horrible defaite:
Puis tout =E0 coup la vengence on verra
Cent, main, soif, faim, quand courra la comete.
Soon after that Mabus shall then die. there shall be A horrible
destruction of men and beasts;
Then suddenly vengeance shall be seen. Bloody hand, thirst, hunger---
when the comet shall stream.
Line 1. 'Mabus' is not identified. It may be a typographical error,
perhaps for 'Malus' (The Evil One), or it may be an

or maybe its simply that morons like you are too stupid to properly
decipher his writings...

yup.

On Jan 13, 11:10 am, "leigh8...@optusnet.com.au"

<leigh8...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

shasta...@my-deja.com wrote:

Per N. via Peter:

When Mabus shortly dies, there shall ensue
Of man and beast a laying waste most dread.
Then suddenly shall vengeance heave in view:
Thirst, famine, blood, with comet overhead.

*shrug*

S~I always wonder why the fascination of C2Q62 clearly no Comet of any

significance and a race to identify the mabus character.FKING MORON

http://www.themoneytimes.com/articles/20070113/3rd_brightest_comet_in...

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/browse_frm/...

like i said

2 many morons around here adding more idiotic interpretations to the
muck

no wonder most people view MN as a failed seer...

they only look and judge him based on failed interpretations by these
kinds of morons

*
As there seems to remain a little confusion in some people's
minds as to what constitutes an anagram and what constitutes a
cryptic anagram, let's look at quatrain II-62 with this in mind:
*
--------------- C E N T V R I E___S E C O N D E. -------------
----------------------- (=E9dition de 1555) --------------------
*
---- 62 - Mabus puis tost alors mourra,viendra ---------------
--------- De gens & bestes vne horrible defaite: -------------
--------- Puis tout =E0 coup la vengence on verra --------------
--------- Cent,main,soif,faim,quand courra la comete. --------
*
Some people here seem to think that the word 'Mabus' in line 1 is
an anagram, or a cryptic anagram, of someone's name. Let's see.
*
To be an anagram, a straight anagram, the word MABUS would have
to have ALL of its letters used in the name of someone else. For
instance, the name MUSAB contains all the letters of this MABUS.
Problemo: in French, MOUSSAB is spelled... MOUSSAB, not MUSAB.
And Nostradamus is not generally known to have written in
American English! :-)
*
To be a cryptic anagram, the word MABUS would have to have ALL of
its letters EXCEPT ONE used in the formation of the name of
someone else. For instance, had the name SADDAM been written
SUDAM, the cryptic anagram might have been valid. The letter D of
SUDAM having been substituted for the letter B of MABUS.
*
So, those who keep insisting that MABUS has something to do with
Saddam Hussein and who link his hanging to the comet seen in
January 2007 ought to look at what Nostradamus writes about this
comet. It is *a running comet* and comets don't run in the sky,
they are just there to be observed.
*
But there are a few man-made objects which, like comets, leave a
trail, but which, unlike comets, run in the sky. One of those
objects just happens to be an intercontinental ballistic missile
launched to avenge the murder on Tienanmen Square of seventy-nine
diplomats of the United States of America posted in Beijing, on
Sunday, August 13, 2017.
*
Problemo: The missile has been properly launched but... has not
been properly targeted. Result: Instead of hitting Tienanmen, the
intended target, it hits the place de la Concorde, in Paris, at
3:53 am on the same day.
*
Which might mean that the then US Ambassador to Beijing is
named... Mabus. Which in turn might explain why his death
referred to in line 1, triggers the vengeance referred to in line
3, the indiscriminate death of men and beasts referred to in line
2, and the agony by thirst and hunger of the temporary survivors
(three quarters of the 3,000,000 Paris deaths) of the
thermonuclear blast, referred to in line 4.
*
When does this happen? When the comet shall run, i.e., when the
ICBM shall hit Paris, as per line 4.
*
Clever, eh, this Nostradamus?!
*
Claude Latr=E9mouille
January 26, 2007http://web.ncf.ca/cj559
*
=3D=3D=3D

On Jan 27, 3:45 am, "eric" <ericdavis...@gmail.com> wrote:

Although, I don't believe Nostradamus is authentic, this is rather
coincidental. We have just had Saddam, who's name reversed is Mabbas -
and we do have the brightest comet in several decades - close to the
horizon, and unless one gets up early in the mornings of early January,
u wouldn't see it - and now it's visible in the Southern
Hemisphere...and further, it seems that the Sunnis are thirsting for
revenge after Saddam's hanging (seen as a heroic death in the face of
taunting Shi'ites), just as Israel, and the U.S. are thinking of
extending the war to Iran...Another Aircraft carrier group to the Gulf,
a commitment to expand the losing war in Afghanistan. The list goes
on, and on. Yep. A real mess.

This verse fits like a glove."We have just had Saddam, who's name reversed is Mabbas -

Sorry Son it is not, or perhaps you can demonstate just how it does?
maddas

and we do have the brightest comet in several decades - close to the
horizon, and unless one gets up early in the mornings of early January,"Yes every comet or bit of debris is cited ad finitum as "THE COMET OF

NOSTRADAMUS" now the comet (aka the killer comet) collides with Earth,
and the Mabus character just has not shown up yet.
Saddam has his own Quatrain see C8Q70 with good orthography and
translation!
LB

*
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:48:02 +0100, Lone Ranger
<snowball2002@bigfoot.com.spamalamadingdong> asked the question above.
*
An answer could be: yes he did but, as usual, in a very obscure
manner. In fact, in a manner which allows his text to be
understood only after the fact or, at best, only after events
have begun to happen.
*
Which events?
*
First, there is a need for the State of Israel to be recognized
and accepted by her neigbours. [SNIP]

*
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:48:02 +0100, Lone Ranger
<snowball2002@bigfoot.com.spamalamadingdong> asked the question above.
*
An answer could be: yes he did but, as usual, in a very obscure
manner. In fact, in a manner which allows his text to be
understood only after the fact or, at best, only after events
have begun to happen.
*
Which events?
*
First, there is a need for the State of Israel to be recognized
and accepted by her neigbours. Second, it also is necessary for
Saddam to attack Israel. Third, it is also useful to understand
Saddam's overthrow as a sequel to the second event. With these
three, quatrain VIII-96 begins to make sense.
*
-------------- C E N T V R I E___H V I T I E M E. ------------
------------------ (=E9dition pr=E9tendue de 1568) ---------------
*
--------------------------- X C V I. -------------------------
--------- La synagogue sterile sans nul fruit ----------------
--------- Sera receu entre les infideles ---------------------
--------- De Babylon la fille du porsuit ---------------------
--------- Misere & triste luy trenchera les aisles. ----------
*
Four lines of meaningful gobbledygook. Each and every word taken
separately makes some sense, but the total poem is perfectly
ridiculous and makes no coherent sense at all.
*
After the fact, after Israel is given international recognition
as a State located in the midst of Muslim countries, after
decades of Palestinian resistance against the new State, after a
reversal by a Palestinian leader who finally recognizes Israel,
after Babylon (Iraq) has been in the news for a few more decades,
things begin to make a little more sense, but ONLY AFTER THE
FACT.
*
The passage of time allows for a decyphered version to be
discovered, one dealing with the Iraqi attitude towards Israel:
when a UN coalition attempts to repel the Iraqi invasion of
Kuwait, Iraq fires a number of Scud missiles towards Israel, in
the expectation that Israel would retaliate (as per her custom),
thus shattering the fragile UN coalition (which then included a
few Arab States) put together by the US. First miscalculation by
Iraq: Israel did not retaliate. The coalition survived.
*
Second miscalculation by Iraq: it is the US which would deal with
Iraq not Israel. Saddam was overthrown, went into hiding, was
betrayed to US forces, was captured, tried, sentenced and
executed. This is the subject of a decyphered version of VIII-96:
*
--------- Hussein (le tyran qui n'a eu le fol atome ----------
--------- afin de le tirer dessus Isra=EBl) --------------------
--------- sera pendu, car le fol idiot luy -------------------
--------- auoit tir=E9 tr=E8s laschement des missyles. -----------
*
Nostradamus links Iraq's failed attempt to produce nuclear
weapons (1981), the cowardly Iraqi attacks upon Israel (1991) and
the ensuing invasion of Iraq (2003) by a much narrower coalition
led by the US, not the UN, such invasion having led to Saddam's
miserable fate. Yes indeed, he got his wings clipped!
*
Have a nice day, folks!
*
Claude Latr=E9mouille
January 15, 2007
http://web.ncf.ca/cj559
*
=3D=3D=3D

On 12 Jan 2007 21:30:41 -0800, "shastaman@my-deja.com"
<shastaman@my-deja.com> wrote:

When Mabus shortly dies, there shall ensue
Of man and beast a laying waste most dread.
Then suddenly shall vengeance heave in view:
Thirst, famine, blood, with comet overhead.

*shrug*

On 12 Jan 2007 21:30:41 -0800, "shastaman@my-deja.com"
<shastaman@my-deja.com> wrote:

When Mabus shortly dies, there shall ensue
Of man and beast a laying waste most dread.
Then suddenly shall vengeance heave in view:
Thirst, famine, blood, with comet overhead.

*shrug*