You never came to my defense

Woodswun wrote:

Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:

Dani wrote:

On 18 May 2005 11:31:50 -0700, "Michael Johnathan McDonald"
<abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote:

Thanks for the great laugh Tony!

Ahm.. not only is Tom not living with his "mommy" - he's not even
living in his home country!

You and me do not hardly, if ever, post or reply to each other, so

why

are you trying to defend a possible fact of TWaty's life so
adamantly then below ask a question? Are you threatened that one of
your libeling friends is being questioned on his dependence with

his

mommy?

Actually, Dani has actually met him in person, so she knows for a

fact.

What is your point?

I have to say that people were getting way too carried away with
something the originator knew to be false when it was posted.

Ah, Now I see! This is your point ;) You are now jumping in the same
boat of defending a sick libelous piece of crap TW here and have
decided to attack me and defend your friend that was in this same boat,

now eh? I bet you one thing that Tony, if he is reading this, is
laughing his head off at you and the other one because you are doing
the same thingy here that you accuse him of and claim you do not like
about him. I wonder if you are even smart enough to realize this or you
just don't care about being a outright flaming hypocrite.

Here let me spell it out for you ( and for the dense others) in real
simple terms:

You never came to my defense when TWaty continually post's filthy sick
outrageous libel against me, eh?. But you sure do not like it when your
friends get it or you from others, eh?

That is, of course, posed to the dense Budstank so it can

understand that was a rhetorical question. Anyway, I see you jump

to

defend the libelous twat while never backing me up against the

Twaty's

libel campaigns, when TWaty calls me a ***** Guzzler and Implies I

do

incest and perverted homosexual sex acts.

And I don't know where Tony got "26"
as Tom's age.. he posted here awhile back that he's 28.

Gosh, I was mostly on my own at age 14 onward.

14? You were a minor - by law you needed adult supervision.

Did it take you 20 years to figure that out? I knew that when I was

12.

...as far as proving to you my age 14 quote, that is hard to prove

here

unless someone gets close to my inner circle which cannot happen

over a

highly public group like this. However, in general you accused me

of

not telling the truth. soo... read on...

Unless you were a transient run-away?

Digging for some dirt, eh? We can go at it if ya want. As far as

I'm

concerned you are defending a hard core libelous piece of crap here
(you call your friend - and others) while complaining to others (

And

them) here that you do not condone such acts.

Your claim was pretty bizarre.

So what? I'm now off that subject presently until this is straitened
out. First I want from you: is to know why you are defending TW on a
regular basis in background facts here and why you have not defended
me in the so many months of his ( and others) continual sick, filthy
down right unbelievably *sick* libel campaign against me.

Have fun showing the moral side of your argument. Maybe this can be you
moment-of-truth (or pinical)

post. Where you come clean with who you
really are and show the whole world the real you, eh Woods?

Woodswun wrote:

Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:

Dani wrote:

On 18 May 2005 11:31:50 -0700, "Michael Johnathan McDonald"
<abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote:

Thanks for the great laugh Tony!

Ahm.. not only is Tom not living with his "mommy" - he's not even
living in his home country!

You and me do not hardly, if ever, post or reply to each other, so

why

are you trying to defend a possible fact of TWaty's life so
adamantly then below ask a question? Are you threatened that one of
your libeling friends is being questioned on his dependence with

his

mommy?

Actually, Dani has actually met him in person, so she knows for a

fact.
What is your point?

I have to say that people were getting way too carried away with
something the originator knew to be false when it was posted.

Ah, Now I see! This is your point ;) You are now jumping in the same
boat of defending a sick libelous piece of crap TW here and have
decided to attack me and defend your friend that was in this same boat,
now eh? I bet you one thing that Tony, if he is reading this, is
laughing his head off at you and the other one because you are doing
the same thingy here that you accuse him of and claim you do not like
about him. I wonder if you are even smart enough to realize this or you
just don't care about being a outright flaming hypocrite.

Here let me spell it out for you ( and for the dense others) in real
simple terms:

You never came to my defense when TWaty continually post's filthy sick
outrageous libel against me, eh?. But you sure do not like it when your
friends get it or you from others, eh?

That is, of course, posed to the dense Budstank so it can

understand that was a rhetorical question. Anyway, I see you jump

to

defend the libelous twat while never backing me up against the

Twaty's

libel campaigns, when TWaty calls me a ***** Guzzler and Implies I

do

incest and perverted homosexual sex acts.

And I don't know where Tony got "26"
as Tom's age.. he posted here awhile back that he's 28.

Gosh, I was mostly on my own at age 14 onward.

14? You were a minor - by law you needed adult supervision.

Did it take you 20 years to figure that out? I knew that when I was

12.

...as far as proving to you my age 14 quote, that is hard to prove

here

unless someone gets close to my inner circle which cannot happen

over a

highly public group like this. However, in general you accused me

of

not telling the truth. soo... read on...

Unless you were a transient run-away?

Digging for some dirt, eh? We can go at it if ya want. As far as

I'm

concerned you are defending a hard core libelous piece of crap here
(you call your friend - and others) while complaining to others (

And

them) here that you do not condone such acts.

Your claim was pretty bizarre.

So what? I'm now off that subject presently until this is straitened
out. First I want from you: is to know why you are defending TW on a
regular basis in background facts here and why you have not defended
me in the so many months of his ( and others) continual sick, filthy
down right unbelievably *sick* libel campaign against me. Have fun
showing the moral side of your argument. Maybe this can be you
moment-of-truth (or pinical) post. Where you come clean with who you
really are and show the whole world the real you, eh Woods?

Let's see if we can make this your
pivotal thread, shall we? ;)

Dani wrote:

On 20 May 2005 11:22:02 -0700, "Michael Johnathan McDonald"
<abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote:

My conduct according to you and Tony's spat has been null and void so
far. I have stayed out of it. I have not defended Tony nor you. However
you have chosen to toss your lots into defending a sick filthy libelous
person on this thread

- then imply that I'm a liar too boot.

You
still have not corrected this.

Let's see if we can make this your
pivotal thread, shall we? ;)

On 18 May 2005 11:31:50 -0700, "Michael Johnathan McDonald"
<abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote:

Thanks for the great laugh Tony!

Ahm.. not only is Tom not living with his "mommy" - he's not even
living in his home country!

You and me do not hardly, if ever, post or reply to each other, so

why

are you trying to defend a possible fact of TWaty's life so
adamantly then below ask a question? Are you threatened that one of
your libeling friends is being questioned on his dependence with his
mommy? That is, of course, posed to the dense Budstank so it can
understand that was a rhetorical question. Anyway, I see you jump to
defend the libelous twat while never backing me up against the

Twaty's

libel campaigns, when TWaty calls me a ***** Guzzler and Implies I do
incest and perverted homosexual sex acts.

And I don't know where Tony got "26"
as Tom's age.. he posted here awhile back that he's 28.

Gosh, I was mostly on my own at age 14 onward.

14? You were a minor - by law you needed adult supervision.

Did it take you 20 years to figure that out? I knew that when I was

12.

...as far as proving to you my age 14 quote, that is hard to prove

here

unless someone gets close to my inner circle which cannot happen

over a

highly public group like this. However, in general you accused me of
not telling the truth. soo... read on...

Unless you were a transient run-away?

Digging for some dirt, eh? We can go at it if ya want. As far as I'm
concerned you are defending a hard core libelous piece of crap here
(you call your friend - and others) while complaining to others (

And

them) here that you do not condone such acts.

I really needed to laugh that you had to explain to Budstank what

you

were doing. He is really dense ;) I mean that you like hanging-out
(online) with the 'self-willed dense crowed' reflects your overall
inherent personality ;)

If you want to imply that I do not tell the truth in general here (

as

you implied to Budstank), then put it to the ultimate test. For
example, You think I lie in general; so I will make a deal to prove
myself if the stakes are high. How about I prove to this group that

I

was accepted at Berkeley and the onus is on me to prove it. You take
the stand that I do not tell the truth and I will take the stand

that I

do. If I prove it - You leave this group forever no excuses. If

your

case is proved I will leave and apologize with admitting everything

I

have said here in the past was false.

Nah.. sorry, Michael. I'm not playing that little "you leave/I

leave"

game.

It was not a little game - it was for huge stakes

that is u leaving
forever,

but to take a risk, of course not,

you will keep making
innuendos toward me posed to others.

You know no other way but to cower
as par your reply here.

It will be strictly on *my* terms when I decide to bid adieu
to apn.

Would those terms be the continuation of backing a sick filthy libelous
person but playing a victim too?

Look! I'm just pointing out your
hypocrisy toward others in regards to libel here - I'm glad I could
help too. ;)

Ask anytime when people need to know about you and they
need to ask about what kinda person Dani is - so I can gladly help them
see the real you ;)

When they think you are being viciously attacked
unfairly by others - just show them here of your defense of a sick,
unfoundedly filthy libelous person. That should do it ;)

I don't know what you're all in a tiff about anyway.. stating that

you

were on your own since you were 14 is not at *all* common in American
society - so why wouldn't I question it? You know American society
sets a high, high precedent on the welfare of children.

So, I wondered if you were a transient runaway.

You're off the subject again - I put that 14 yo quote on hold
because you implied to Budstank I was a liar.

YOU did not ", I
wondered" you actually implied to him that you didn't believe me.
Then, I challenged you and you are now running away like a chicken

with
a lame excuse.

Maybe you are too dense to see that but heah, not my
problem.

Oh and btw - you said I never "backed" you against Tom? When have

you

ever backed me against Tony?

Of course not, nor Tony - Tony is man enough without my help. If you
are too dense to know the difference of what you did here vs. my
conduct according to you and Tony's spat than let me put it in more
simplistic terms:

I knew you would say this but you are too dense to see that I do (did)
not jump into your threads as defender against a libelous, as you have
done here.

That is what you exactly did

- then on top of that,
again, you implied I was the liar in general.

That is something I
haven't done to you. Again, U Came to the defense of a scumbag
libelous piece of crap

and you accuse others here that this is not the
path to follow. Lol.

Now I laugh at you because you lost any
credibility you ever had here with me.

I'm sure you really feel bad
about that ha! But anyway, anytime you make a claim against someone of
any type of Libel, then I will refer (here) to you defending a sick,
filthy outrageous libelous person so adamantly - something you have
chosen to befriend with a defend.

All of this reply here shows is that you approve of such scumbag
conduct. But should I have thought any different? Why?

have a nice day, make a wise choice ;)

Hey.. hey.. you know it, sport.

That only thing that you posted that could be termed as ' know' is
that you ran away from facing your own dummy made decision to back a
filthy, sick libelous with the phrase: ''you know it, sport''.