Chadwick Stone=A9 wrote:
<lazi@iname.com> wrote in message
news:1105368397.998205.306300@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
A week or so back Ennis was delightedly waving an article about him
in
Der Speigel, hoping that no one would translate the article and see
it
was slagging him off.
Now another article has appeared in the UK Sunday Broadsheet 'The
Observer' which I found through reading an article on Slashdot.org.
It's about Wikipedia and doesn't mention Ennis by name, but it's
hard
not to recognise who its talking about.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,1386027,00.html
(begin quote)
Then a well-known crackpot wrote a Wikipedia page about himself,
only
to have it, er, rendered more objective by other contributors. This
drove him wild. Again the page was locked (in what seemed to me to
be
an admirably detached state) to prevent further vandalism.
Opponents of Wikipedia sought to use the episode as evidence that
an
open project cannot work. Supporters argued it proved the opposite.
(end quote)
Truly, Ennis is world infamous.
PEnnis needs to start a new hobby. I recommend drug abuse.
Isn't that how he got to where he is today? Braindamaged.
Susan
.
