Guess all of you with hatred for President Bush, better
start aiming your venom at your Liberal friend, Tony Blair.
Tony
Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric'
From correspondents in London
February 2, 2004
THE British government has seen "categoric" evidence that Iraq possessed
weapons of mass destruction ahead of the war to unseat Saddam Hussein, one of
British Prime Minister Tony Blair's top ministers insisted today.
The decision to go to war based on that intelligence had been "right", said
Peter Hain, who is Leader of the House of Commons and a key supporter of the
prime minister.
Hain's vehemence comes despite growing signs that US President George W Bush
has accepted the possibility that evidence of chemical and biological weapons
might never be found in Iraq.
Former chief US weapons hunter David Kay, who stepped down as head of the Iraq
Survey Group, said last week pre-war intelligence about the weapons had been
"all wrong".
Today, The Washington Post reported Bush had agreed to support an independent
probe into any intelligence failures.
The stakes are particularly high for Blair as he invested a huge amount of his
political credibility in seeking to persuade a sceptical British public war was
necessary because Iraq presented an immediate threat.
While inspectors "haven't found missiles in the middle of the Iraqi desert
pointing at neighbouring countries", Hain said, the Iraq Survey Group had
uncovered "a lot of evidence" of illegal weapons programs.
The pre-war position was also clear, he said.
"I saw evidence that was categoric on Saddam possessing chemical and biological
weapons of mass destruction," he told BBC television.
"I saw that intelligence evidence, so did the prime minister, so did other
cabinet ministers. That informed our decision to go to topple him. I think we
were right in doing so," he said.
Agence France-Presse
.
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: UK Says: Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric' |
02 Feb 2004 10:45:20 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040202080645.20606.00000759@mb-m21.aol.com...
Guess all of you with hatred for President Bush, better
start aiming your venom at your Liberal friend, Tony Blair.
Tony
Always somebody else's fault with you people isn't it tony?
Is Bush so stupid that he or his administration will fight a war
on the say so of someone else? unable to check facts for themselves?
Blair's a poodle and he'll no doubt pass the buck onto the military or
security services despite all his ***** about evidence and proof just
a few months ago.
Seems to me you have the president you deserve tony, pity all the
normal Americans have him too though.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: UK Says: Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric' |
02 Feb 2004 06:03:55 PM |
|
|
In article <P8vTb.15686$YV1.3781@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040202080645.20606.00000759@mb-m21.aol.com...
Guess all of you with hatred for President Bush, better
start aiming your venom at your Liberal friend, Tony Blair.
Tony
Always somebody else's fault with you people isn't it tony?
Is Bush so stupid that he or his administration will fight a war
on the say so of someone else? unable to check facts for themselves?
Blair's a poodle and he'll no doubt pass the buck onto the military or
security services despite all his ***** about evidence and proof just
a few months ago.
Seems to me you have the president you deserve tony, pity all the
normal Americans have him too though.
Wait ... doesn't "normal" mean "average"? I don't think you'll find many of us
who'd admit to being nothing but "average"!
:-D
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: UK Says: Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric' |
05 Feb 2004 02:16:04 PM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:LzBTb.27746$n62.19940@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Wait ... doesn't "normal" mean "average"? I don't think you'll find many
of us
who'd admit to being nothing but "average"!
No mam(?), normal means just that, had I meant average I would have said
that.
In tony's case the inference is clear I believe. I wouldn't dare call you
average.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: UK Says: Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric' |
05 Feb 2004 07:05:54 PM |
|
|
In article <TLxUb.17987$JL4.145923@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net>, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:LzBTb.27746$n62.19940@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Wait ... doesn't "normal" mean "average"? I don't think you'll find many
of us
who'd admit to being nothing but "average"!
No mam(?), normal means just that, had I meant average I would have said
that.
In tony's case the inference is clear I believe. I wouldn't dare call you
average.
Oh, I was just joking, but thanks for being sweet about it. :-)
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: UK Says: Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric' |
06 Feb 2004 06:34:45 AM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:SLBUb.26702$iJ3.16153@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Oh, I was just joking, but thanks for being sweet about it. :-)
Just doing my job mam.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: UK Says: Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric' |
02 Feb 2004 10:00:05 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040202080645.20606.00000759@mb-m21.aol.com...
Guess all of you with hatred for President Bush, better
start aiming your venom at your Liberal friend, Tony Blair.
Who are you talking to Tony? You ARE aware Blair isn't, and has never
described himself as a "liberal" aren't you? Apparently not..
You are also aware that Blair, inspired by HIS liberal friend George, is
expected to announce a full inquiry into intelligence failures re: WMD
today, aren't you?
Tony
Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric'
From correspondents in London
February 2, 2004
THE British government has seen "categoric" evidence that Iraq possessed
weapons of mass destruction ahead of the war to unseat Saddam Hussein, one
of
British Prime Minister Tony Blair's top ministers insisted today.
The decision to go to war based on that intelligence had been "right",
said
Peter Hain, who is Leader of the House of Commons and a key supporter of
the
prime minister.
Hain's vehemence comes despite growing signs that US President George W
Bush
has accepted the possibility that evidence of chemical and biological
weapons
might never be found in Iraq.
Former chief US weapons hunter David Kay, who stepped down as head of the
Iraq
Survey Group, said last week pre-war intelligence about the weapons had
been
"all wrong".
Today, The Washington Post reported Bush had agreed to support an
independent
probe into any intelligence failures.
The stakes are particularly high for Blair as he invested a huge amount of
his
political credibility in seeking to persuade a sceptical British public
war was
necessary because Iraq presented an immediate threat.
While inspectors "haven't found missiles in the middle of the Iraqi desert
pointing at neighbouring countries", Hain said, the Iraq Survey Group had
uncovered "a lot of evidence" of illegal weapons programs.
The pre-war position was also clear, he said.
"I saw evidence that was categoric on Saddam possessing chemical and
biological
weapons of mass destruction," he told BBC television.
"I saw that intelligence evidence, so did the prime minister, so did other
cabinet ministers. That informed our decision to go to topple him. I think
we
were right in doing so," he said.
Agence France-Presse
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Negraeff" |
|
| Title: Re: UK Says: Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric' |
02 Feb 2004 03:35:24 PM |
|
|
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20040202080645.20606.00000759@mb-m21.aol.com>...
Guess all of you with hatred for President Bush, better
start aiming your venom at your Liberal friend, Tony Blair.
Tony
Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric'
From correspondents in London
Correspondents in London? Who?
February 2, 2004
THE British government has seen "categoric" evidence that Iraq possessed
weapons of mass destruction ahead of the war to unseat Saddam Hussein, one of
British Prime Minister Tony Blair's top ministers insisted today.
The decision to go to war based on that intelligence had been "right", said
Peter Hain, who is Leader of the House of Commons and a key supporter of the
prime minister.
Hain's vehemence comes despite growing signs that US President George W Bush
has accepted the possibility that evidence of chemical and biological weapons
might never be found in Iraq.
Former chief US weapons hunter David Kay, who stepped down as head of the Iraq
Survey Group, said last week pre-war intelligence about the weapons had been
"all wrong".
Today, The Washington Post reported Bush had agreed to support an independent
probe into any intelligence failures.
The stakes are particularly high for Blair as he invested a huge amount of his
political credibility in seeking to persuade a sceptical British public war was
necessary because Iraq presented an immediate threat.
While inspectors "haven't found missiles in the middle of the Iraqi desert
pointing at neighbouring countries", Hain said, the Iraq Survey Group had
uncovered "a lot of evidence" of illegal weapons programs.
The pre-war position was also clear, he said.
"I saw evidence that was categoric on Saddam possessing chemical and biological
weapons of mass destruction," he told BBC television.
"I saw that intelligence evidence, so did the prime minister, so did other
cabinet ministers. That informed our decision to go to topple him. I think we
were right in doing so," he said.
Agence France-Presse
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: UK Says: Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric' |
02 Feb 2004 06:02:11 PM |
|
|
In article <20040202080645.20606.00000759@mb-m21.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Guess all of you with hatred for President Bush, better
start aiming your venom at your Liberal friend, Tony Blair.
Where have you been? He's been getting it for lying about WMDs, too - just not
as much from Americans because we can't vote that slime out of office.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ex." |
|
| Title: Re: UK Says: Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric' |
02 Feb 2004 06:12:35 PM |
|
|
Kay was paid off by Hussein ... he had to have been. He looks like a weasel.
Blair has more intelligence in one of his anal hairs then Bush possesses in
his whole body.
Tony B's our 21st Century Churchill .... Bush is our 21st Century 'Mr. Ed
The Talking Mule'.
Don't go catagorizing Bush-Haters with Terrorist-Loving, Anti-American,
Neo-Nazi, Queer-Loving Liberals. In fact, if you REALLY love America, you
can't help but hate such a complete idiot like Bush. Look at the *****-whits
track record ... he has yet to make any kind of positive impact on this
world for the betterment of mankind.
/ex
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040202080645.20606.00000759@mb-m21.aol.com...
: Guess all of you with hatred for President Bush, better
: start aiming your venom at your Liberal friend, Tony Blair.
:
: Tony
:
: Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric'
: From correspondents in London
: February 2, 2004
:
: THE British government has seen "categoric" evidence that Iraq possessed
: weapons of mass destruction ahead of the war to unseat Saddam Hussein, one
of
: British Prime Minister Tony Blair's top ministers insisted today.
:
: The decision to go to war based on that intelligence had been "right",
said
: Peter Hain, who is Leader of the House of Commons and a key supporter of
the
: prime minister.
:
: Hain's vehemence comes despite growing signs that US President George W
Bush
: has accepted the possibility that evidence of chemical and biological
weapons
: might never be found in Iraq.
:
: Former chief US weapons hunter David Kay, who stepped down as head of the
Iraq
: Survey Group, said last week pre-war intelligence about the weapons had
been
: "all wrong".
:
: Today, The Washington Post reported Bush had agreed to support an
independent
: probe into any intelligence failures.
:
: The stakes are particularly high for Blair as he invested a huge amount of
his
: political credibility in seeking to persuade a sceptical British public
war was
: necessary because Iraq presented an immediate threat.
:
: While inspectors "haven't found missiles in the middle of the Iraqi desert
: pointing at neighbouring countries", Hain said, the Iraq Survey Group had
: uncovered "a lot of evidence" of illegal weapons programs.
:
: The pre-war position was also clear, he said.
:
: "I saw evidence that was categoric on Saddam possessing chemical and
biological
: weapons of mass destruction," he told BBC television.
:
: "I saw that intelligence evidence, so did the prime minister, so did other
: cabinet ministers. That informed our decision to go to topple him. I think
we
: were right in doing so," he said.
:
: Agence France-Presse
:
.
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Bud" |
|
| Title: Re: UK Says: Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric' |
02 Feb 2004 07:32:41 PM |
|
|
While still snuggled in a 'spider hole', "Ex." <Eat.Healthy@Turdmail.com>
scribbled:
Kay was paid off by Hussein ... he had to have been. He looks like a weasel.
Sorry, you were looking in a mirror.
To reply by email, remove the XYZ.
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ex." |
|
| Title: Re: UK Says: Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric' |
02 Feb 2004 08:02:15 PM |
|
|
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:lgut10pth05f1eje0u9t7jpkc5kcm6p5lb@4ax.com...
: While still snuggled in a 'spider hole', "Ex." <Eat.Healthy@Turdmail.com>
: scribbled:
:
: >Kay was paid off by Hussein ... he had to have been. He looks like a
weasel.
:
: Sorry, you were looking in a mirror.
I was JOKING Bud ... lighten up. Quit drinking all that dark ale and go for
a 'Bud Light'...
/ex
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: UK Says: Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric' |
03 Feb 2004 07:49:44 AM |
|
|
I find it funny how the Liberals here want to avoid this.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: UK Says: Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric' |
03 Feb 2004 07:59:09 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040203084944.11350.00001115@mb-m05.aol.com...
I find it funny how the Liberals here want to avoid this.
Avoid what, Tony? And just who are "the liberals here" or does liberal =
anyone who doesn't think like Tony (a fairly broad constituency, I imagine)
in the same way thta "anyone who doesn't think like Jean Guernob" =
anti-semite?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: UK Says: Evidence of Iraq's WMD 'categoric' |
03 Feb 2004 04:36:48 PM |
|
|
In article <20040203084944.11350.00001115@mb-m05.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
I find it funny how the Liberals here want to avoid this.
If "Liberals" wanted to avoid it, they'd keep their mouths shut and let Fuhrers
Bush, Rumsfeld, and Ashcroft do as they pleased with American Liberty. In
short, you wouldn't have to feel uncomfortable with the fact that Bush is an
anti-American despot.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
