http://www.gov.on.ca/FIN/english/demographics/dtr0303e.htm
Check out the chart, it cleary shows a DECREASE in the
population of Europe, and very little growth in North America,
while at the same time showing huge increases in Africa, Asia
and Latin America.
Europe's population will decline despite massive immigration
from non-white countries, showing that the indigenous white
population will be dwindling at a rather rapid rate. Alll of the
increase in North America will be due to non-white immigration
and high birth rates of these immigrants.
And this is just over the next 45 years, extrapolate this out
to the year 2100 and the white race is all but gone.
Tony
.
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
10 Dec 2004 08:26:02 AM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
Absolute Zero
wrote:
The Sumerians are of UNKNOWN origin.
They may even have been BLACK!
(the black-headed people)
Only a complete moron would think that black people would only refer to the
their heads. It's obviously a reference to hair color.
Is it?
I rather suspect that all of the peoples of >that region would have had black
hair, >wouldn't you?
Nope.
Care to show some evidence?
-A
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
08 Dec 2004 08:54:05 PM |
|
|
Absolute Zero wrote:
Grantland wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote:
In article <41b730ef.102893372@ct-news.iafrica.com>,
mithril@iafrica.com wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid>
wrote:
"Grantland" <mithril@iafrica.com> wrote in message
news:41b65d09.48646700@ct-news.iafrica.com...
That's very foolish. The white man is wholly responsible for
Western
civilization.
***** are you going to pretend that the Portugese, Spanish,
Greek
Roman and other such civilisations had nothing to do with Western
civilisation?
or are you going to pretend all of these >peoples were "white
men"?
LOL!!!
They're all European Caucasions, you Bufoon!!!
Amy's auto-spellig leson, rites...
Caucasians, you Buffoon.
Drat, how did those slanty-eyed Asians get into the Caucasus ;)
Incidentally...
Caucasian:
Of or being a major human racial classification traditionally
distinguished by physical characteristics such as very light to
brown skin pigmentation and straight to wavy or curly hair, and
including peoples indigenous to Europe, northern Africa, western
Asia, and India. No longer in scientific use.
I wonder why?
The notion of race is nearly as problematic from a scientific
point of view as it is from a social one. European physical
anthropologists of the 17th and 18th centuries proposed various
systems of racial classifications based on such observable
characteristics as skin color, hair type, body proportions, and
skull measurements, essentially codifying the perceived
differences among broad geographic populations of humans. The
traditional terms for these populations--Caucasoid (or
Caucasian), Mongoloid, Negroid, and in some systems
Australoid--are now controversial in both technical and
nontechnical usage, and in some cases they may well be considered
offensive. (Caucasian does retain a certain currency in American
English, but it is used almost exclusively to mean “white” or
“European” rather than “belonging to the Caucasian race,” a group
that includes a variety of peoples generally categorized as
non-white.) The biological aspect of race is described today not
in observable physical features but rather in such genetic
characteristics as blood groups and metabolic processes, and the
groupings indicated by these factors seldom coincide very neatly
with those put forward by earlier physical anthropologists.
Citing this and other points--such as the fact that a person who
is considered black in one society might be nonblack in
anothermany cultural anthropologists now consider race to be more
a social or mental construct than an objective biological fact.
Deal with it Phoney, you too Grumpland.
Complete non-sequitur.
Are the "peoples indigenous to Europe, northern Africa, western
Asia, and India" part of the "white race", eh?
-A
Europeans.
Then your distinctions aren't racial but cultural.
Fine.
-A
Europe is Western Civilization, capiche? The origins. Let's not
quibble. The white man = Europe = Western Civilization. Very simple.
The white man; not the scheming Jew, not the clever Indian, not the
insanely intelligent Chink/Jap/Korean. Certainly not the subhuman
African.. THE WHITE MAN. Invented the wheel - and everything else.
Sorry, but you are wrong. The wheel most likely was invented in the
Middle East (Mesopotamia). In fact, nearly everything "the white
man" has come up with has its origins in other, non-white cultures
that preceded 'the white man" being the technologically dominant skin
color.
*****. I would call the Assyrians white men.
Wriggling?
The Sumerians invented the wheel.
The Assyrian designation didn't exist until AFTER the demise of the
Sumerians. IOW, the Assyrians did NOT invent the wheel.
The Sumerians are of UNKNOWN origin.
They may even have been BLACK!
(the black-headed people)
Who isn't white... when it suits you?
Anyway you're
wriggling.
PKB
The last 500 years have seen modern Western Civilization
created by the white man
Whoop-de-doo, civilizational spurts have occurred in many locations and
periods of history.
Conclusion? Zilch.
and no one else. Period.
Said civilization came close to destroying the whole world in the last
50. Pretty damn clever, huh?
-A
Well?
If you’re going to swoop down from your eyrie on Mount Olympus to
actually partake of debate, rather than the usual cluster-bombs and
expletives lobbed casually from the nest, then you’d better have an
argument that bears examination.
Respectfully and humbly, up-yours -A
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
08 Dec 2004 11:56:26 PM |
|
|
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Absolute Zero wrote:
Grantland wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote:
In article <41b730ef.102893372@ct-news.iafrica.com>,
mithril@iafrica.com wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid>
wrote:
"Grantland" <mithril@iafrica.com> wrote in message
news:41b65d09.48646700@ct-news.iafrica.com...
That's very foolish. The white man is wholly responsible for
Western
civilization.
***** are you going to pretend that the Portugese, Spanish,
Greek
Roman and other such civilisations had nothing to do with Western
civilisation?
or are you going to pretend all of these >peoples were "white
men"?
LOL!!!
They're all European Caucasions, you Bufoon!!!
Amy's auto-spellig leson, rites...
Caucasians, you Buffoon.
Drat, how did those slanty-eyed Asians get into the Caucasus ;)
Incidentally...
Caucasian:
Of or being a major human racial classification traditionally
distinguished by physical characteristics such as very light to
brown skin pigmentation and straight to wavy or curly hair, and
including peoples indigenous to Europe, northern Africa, western
Asia, and India. No longer in scientific use.
I wonder why?
The notion of race is nearly as problematic from a scientific
point of view as it is from a social one. European physical
anthropologists of the 17th and 18th centuries proposed various
systems of racial classifications based on such observable
characteristics as skin color, hair type, body proportions, and
skull measurements, essentially codifying the perceived
differences among broad geographic populations of humans. The
traditional terms for these populations--Caucasoid (or
Caucasian), Mongoloid, Negroid, and in some systems
Australoid--are now controversial in both technical and
nontechnical usage, and in some cases they may well be considered
offensive. (Caucasian does retain a certain currency in American
English, but it is used almost exclusively to mean “white” or
“European” rather than “belonging to the Caucasian race,” a group
that includes a variety of peoples generally categorized as
non-white.) The biological aspect of race is described today not
in observable physical features but rather in such genetic
characteristics as blood groups and metabolic processes, and the
groupings indicated by these factors seldom coincide very neatly
with those put forward by earlier physical anthropologists.
Citing this and other points--such as the fact that a person who
is considered black in one society might be nonblack in
anothermany cultural anthropologists now consider race to be more
a social or mental construct than an objective biological fact.
Deal with it Phoney, you too Grumpland.
Complete non-sequitur.
Are the "peoples indigenous to Europe, northern Africa, western
Asia, and India" part of the "white race", eh?
-A
Europeans.
Then your distinctions aren't racial but cultural.
Fine.
-A
Europe is Western Civilization, capiche? The origins. Let's not
quibble. The white man = Europe = Western Civilization. Very simple.
The white man; not the scheming Jew, not the clever Indian, not the
insanely intelligent Chink/Jap/Korean. Certainly not the subhuman
African.. THE WHITE MAN. Invented the wheel - and everything else.
Sorry, but you are wrong. The wheel most likely was invented in the
Middle East (Mesopotamia). In fact, nearly everything "the white
man" has come up with has its origins in other, non-white cultures
that preceded 'the white man" being the technologically dominant skin
color.
*****. I would call the Assyrians white men.
Wriggling?
The Sumerians invented the wheel.
The Assyrian designation didn't exist until AFTER the demise of the
Sumerians. IOW, the Assyrians did NOT invent the wheel.
The Sumerians are of UNKNOWN origin.
They may even have been BLACK!
(the black-headed people)
Who isn't white... when it suits you?
Anyway you're
wriggling.
PKB
The last 500 years have seen modern Western Civilization
created by the white man
Whoop-de-doo, civilizational spurts have occurred in many locations and
periods of history.
Conclusion? Zilch.
and no one else. Period.
Said civilization came close to destroying the whole world in the last
50. Pretty damn clever, huh?
-A
Well?
If you’re going to swoop down from your eyrie on Mount Olympus to
actually partake of debate, rather than the usual cluster-bombs and
expletives lobbed casually from the nest, then you’d better have an
argument that bears examination.
Respectfully and humbly, up-yours -A
Why should I respond to your non-sequiturs? If you're implying that
somehow the uncovery of dangerous physical realities like fission and
fusion .. negates .. 500 years.. towering achievements... arghhhhh.
See? Not worth 20 seconds. Anyway, (and to their credit), Jews
uncovered said realities.
Grantland
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
09 Dec 2004 06:27:24 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
In fact, nearly everything "the white >man" has come up with has
its origins in other, non-white cultures
LOL!!!!
I can see that you have had a thorough brainwashing.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
08 Dec 2004 04:58:35 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
mithril@iafrica.com wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote:
In article <hjltd.153$Ov4.130@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net>, "Krib"
<krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041207114411.14349.00001405@mb-m13.aol.com...
I doubt it worries anybody but a racist >moron like him.
But if it were the Black or Asian race that were faced with
extermination,
you and you ilk would be protesting to find a way to prevent it.
Wong again trannyz I already said I don't care, unlike you I'm able to
see that we live in a dynamic environment where change is constant and
inevitable. The only person within APN that posts this utter crap is
you because you're a filthy racist *****.
The two populations you use as an example are interesting in that the
majority of their peoples still live in relative poverty where large
families are still the norm. You seem unable to grasp that the figures
that scare you so much are simply a snapshot of a single moment in time
and
attempting to extrapolate any useful data from it is meaningless.
Less than 100 years ago large families in England were the norm, as the
population became better educated and women won their suffrage and
started to enter the workplace in ever larger numbers the natural
consequence was smaller families. I'm willing to bet a similar situation
will win out elsewhere whereas you would rather indulge in your
histrionic bleating because it gives you an excuse to indulge your
bigotry,
(you're never happier when there's someone else you can hate).
Anyway, let me indulge you and pretend your nightmares are to be realised,
exactly what do you think you can do about it eh? just what does your
bleating in APN achieve?
Interesting how he considers intermarriage between races which (he thinks)
will
eventually lead to no "pure" Whites to be akin to "extermination", huh?
Woods
Look what happened to the Caribbean >>colonies. Look what happened to
South America. Devolution in action.
I'm not saying that the White race may >not disappear over thousands of years,
It's not going to take anywhere near that long.
but it's hardly "extermination", which >implies genocide,
What's the difference how it happens? The result is the same.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
08 Dec 2004 04:56:45 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Interesting how he considers >intermarriage between races which (he >thinks)
will eventually lead to no "pure" >Whites to be akin to "extermination", >huh?
Hey Clueless, there was quite the uproar when "ethnic cleansing" was going on
in Yugoslavia, it was not only being done by killing, it was also being done
via rape.
That you don't know this shows once again just how clueless you are.
How does it feel being so clueless and stupid?
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
08 Dec 2004 08:10:16 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041208055645.06349.00001062@mb-m27.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Interesting how he considers >intermarriage between races which (he
thinks)
will eventually lead to no "pure" >Whites to be akin to "extermination",
huh?
Hey Clueless, there was quite the uproar when "ethnic cleansing" was going
on
in Yugoslavia, it was not only being done by killing, it was also being
done
via rape.
Interesting.. so you think inter-marriage and rape are the same thing?
That you don't know this shows once again just how clueless you are.
What on earth leads you to believe taht she didn't know this? Itäs not
exactly relevant to the topic under discussion..
How does it feel being so clueless and stupid?
If she ever wanted to know, I'm sure you'd be the first person she'd think
of asking..
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
09 Dec 2004 06:11:34 AM |
|
|
"tw"
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041208055645.06349.00001062@mb-m27.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Interesting how he considers >intermarriage between races which (he
thinks)
will eventually lead to no "pure" >Whites to be akin to "extermination",
huh?
Hey Clueless, there was quite the uproar when "ethnic cleansing" was going
on
in Yugoslavia, it was not only being done by killing, it was also being
done
via rape.
Interesting.. so you think inter-marriage >and rape are the same thing?
Interracial marriage still remains a rare thing, but interracial pregnancy is
booming, and a lot of it is done through intimidation.
That you don't know this shows once >>again just how clueless you are.
What on earth leads you to believe taht >she didn't know this? Itäs not
exactly relevant to the topic under >discussion..
Just by the way she posted her reply.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
09 Dec 2004 06:45:25 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041209071134.08274.00001764@mb-m05.aol.com...
"tw"
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041208055645.06349.00001062@mb-m27.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Interesting how he considers >intermarriage between races which (he
thinks)
will eventually lead to no "pure" >Whites to be akin to
"extermination",
huh?
Hey Clueless, there was quite the uproar when "ethnic cleansing" was
going
on
in Yugoslavia, it was not only being done by killing, it was also being
done
via rape.
Interesting.. so you think inter-marriage >and rape are the same thing?
Interracial marriage still remains a rare thing, but interracial pregnancy
is
booming, and a lot of it is done through intimidation.
So you DO think interracial pregnancy and rape are the same thing! Man.
you're weird.
That you don't know this shows once >>again just how clueless you are.
What on earth leads you to believe taht >she didn't know this? Itäs not
exactly relevant to the topic under >discussion..
Just by the way she posted her reply.
LOL! What way was that then? One handed while screaming with laughter at
your bizarre ideas?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
08 Dec 2004 08:18:55 AM |
|
|
In article <cp71p0$9bt$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>, "tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041208055645.06349.00001062@mb-m27.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Interesting how he considers >intermarriage between races which (he
thinks)
will eventually lead to no "pure" >Whites to be akin to "extermination",
huh?
Hey Clueless, there was quite the uproar when "ethnic cleansing" was going
on
in Yugoslavia, it was not only being done by killing, it was also being
done
via rape.
Interesting.. so you think inter-marriage and rape are the same thing?
Yes, very interesting that he considers killing, rape and intermarriage to be
interchangeable. Quite fascinating, really.
That you don't know this shows once again just how clueless you are.
What on earth leads you to believe taht she didn't know this? Itäs not
exactly relevant to the topic under discussion..
Well, normal people don't consider killing and rape to be the same thing as
intermarriage, nor intermarriage to be remotely akin to "ethnic cleansing". It
really does speak volumes about his White Supremacist mindset, wouldn't you say?
How does it feel being so clueless and stupid?
If she ever wanted to know, I'm sure you'd be the first person she'd think
of asking..
He's working his way up towards the top of the list, that's for sure.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
09 Dec 2004 06:13:55 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
, "tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041208055645.06349.00001062@mb-m27.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Interesting how he considers >intermarriage between races which (he
thinks)
will eventually lead to no "pure" >Whites to be akin to "extermination",
huh?
Hey Clueless, there was quite the uproar when "ethnic cleansing" was going
on
in Yugoslavia, it was not only being done by killing, it was also being
done
via rape.
Interesting.. so you think inter-marriage >>and rape are the same thing?
Yes, very interesting that he considers >killing, rape and intermarriage to be
interchangeable. Quite fascinating, >really.
No one said a damn thing about interracial marrige until Tommy brough it up, so
WTF are you talking about?
That you don't know this shows once >>>again just how clueless you are.
What on earth leads you to believe taht she didn't know this? Itäs not
exactly relevant to the topic under >>discussion..
Well, normal people don't consider killing >and rape to be the same thing as
intermarriage, nor intermarriage to be >remotely akin to "ethnic cleansing".
Neither do I, but mass interracial pregnancy, many done through intimidation
is.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
07 Dec 2004 05:56:05 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 16:58:53 GMT, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041207114411.14349.00001405@mb-m13.aol.com...
I doubt it worries anybody but a racist >moron like him.
But if it were the Black or Asian race that were faced with extermination,
you and you ilk would be protesting to find a way to prevent it.
Wong again trannyz I already said I don't care, unlike you I'm able to
see that we live in a dynamic environment where change is constant and
inevitable. The only person within APN that posts this utter crap is
you because you're a filthy racist *****.
The two populations you use as an example are interesting in that the
majority of their peoples still live in relative poverty where large
families are still the norm. You seem unable to grasp that the figures
that scare you so much are simply a snapshot of a single moment in time and
attempting to extrapolate any useful data from it is meaningless.
Less than 100 years ago large families in England were the norm, as the
population became better educated and women won their suffrage and
started to enter the workplace in ever larger numbers the natural
consequence was smaller families. I'm willing to bet a similar situation
will win out elsewhere whereas you would rather indulge in your
histrionic bleating because it gives you an excuse to indulge your bigotry,
(you're never happier when there's someone else you can hate).
Anyway, let me indulge you and pretend your nightmares are to be realised,
exactly what do you think you can do about it eh? just what does your
bleating in APN achieve?
Exactly, Krib. And like you said - he's only got two kids.. why is he
not doing more, by having more kids (even adopting a bright-blue-eyed,
blonde haired child if circumstances don't allow him and his wife to
have any more kids?)
And like you, I'm not concerned with the "white race dying out" at
all. Just don't believe it will happen. It isn't something that
crosses the minds of those of us that aren't racist; but, then he'll
turn around and say he's not a racist!
Oh and he had two kids with a *Latino*! Duh! Guess he was wasn't too
concerned about his *own* kids being 100% white. But that's his MO;
do as I say - not as I do.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
08 Dec 2004 05:07:51 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
why is he
not doing more, by having more kids (even adopting a bright-blue-eyed,
blonde haired child
That you think that adopting somehow adds to the population just goes to show
how very DENSE you are.
And like you, I'm not concerned with the "white race dying out" at
all. Just don't believe it will happen.
Because you're a moron who is incapable of interpreting the data.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
08 Dec 2004 08:24:13 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041208060751.06349.00001068@mb-m27.aol.com...
Dani
wrote:
why is he
not doing more, by having more kids (even adopting a bright-blue-eyed,
blonde haired child
That you think that adopting somehow adds to the population just goes to
show
how very DENSE you are.
And like you, I'm not concerned with the "white race dying out" at
all. Just don't believe it will happen.
Because you're a moron who is incapable of interpreting the data.
Hey Tony! How come you smipped this bit.. ashamed of being a "race traitor"
eh?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
08 Dec 2004 08:26:00 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041208060751.06349.00001068@mb-m27.aol.com...
Dani
wrote:
why is he
not doing more, by having more kids (even adopting a bright-blue-eyed,
blonde haired child
That you think that adopting somehow adds to the population just goes to
show
how very DENSE you are.
And like you, I'm not concerned with the "white race dying out" at
all. Just don't believe it will happen.
Because you're a moron who is incapable of interpreting the data.
Oops. Let's try again.. why did you snip this bit Tony? Ashamed of being
revealed as a "race traitor" ti your white supremacist buddies?
Dani wrote:
Oh and he had two kids with a *Latino*! Duh! Guess he was wasn't too
concerned about his *own* kids being 100% white. But that's his MO;
do as I say - not as I do.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
08 Dec 2004 11:17:29 PM |
|
|
On 08 Dec 2004 11:07:51 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
why is he
not doing more, by having more kids (even adopting a bright-blue-eyed,
blonde haired child
That you think that adopting somehow adds to the population just goes to show
how very DENSE you are.
At least you can say that *you've* personally done something to keep
the white race going. Why you could adopt three girls; they turn 18,
you could start sending them off to mate like brood mares. You'll
have lots and lots of blonde-haired blue-eyed grandchildren, and you
can say that you have done your part in raising the odds that we'll
survive! Yes! We will prosper! We shall preveil! And it's *all*
because of Mr. Zanofrick!!
(now back to reality)
Hey puke - if you're so concerned, why are your only two kids
half LATINO??
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
09 Dec 2004 06:15:24 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
That you think that adopting somehow adds to the population just goes to
show
how very DENSE you are.
At least you can say that *you've* >personally done something to keep
the white race going.
Again you show how dense you are.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: UN predicts decline of white race |
11 Dec 2004 03:59:50 PM |
|
|
On 09 Dec 2004 12:15:24 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
That you think that adopting somehow adds to the population just goes to
show
how very DENSE you are.
At least you can say that *you've* personally done something to keep
the white race going.
Again you show how dense you are.
What are you talking about? I married a white man with
baby-blue eyes. You married a Puerto-Rican! Although my marriage
didn't work - who between the two of us did more to help prevent
the "decline of the white race"?? The one who married within her
race - or the one who married outside his race?
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Dani exposed as a racist |
12 Dec 2004 09:02:13 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
What are you talking about? I married a >white man with baby-blue eyes. You
married a Puerto-Rican!
Damn, that statement sure smacks of racism.
You have been exposed as the racist I always knew you were.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Dani exposed as a racist |
12 Dec 2004 02:01:37 PM |
|
|
On 12 Dec 2004 15:02:13 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
What are you talking about? I married a white man with baby-blue eyes. You
married a Puerto-Rican!
Damn, that statement sure smacks of racism.
LOL! Hey - where's the quoted text, freak?
You have been exposed as the racist I always knew you were.
lol!
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Dani exposed as a racist |
13 Dec 2004 07:48:11 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
What are you talking about? I married a white man with baby-blue eyes.
You
married a Puerto-Rican!
Damn, that statement sure smacks of >>racism.
LOL! Hey - where's the quoted text,
It's right there, doesn't matter what went before or after it, your words show
that you think it's much better thing that you married "a white man with
baby-blue eyes" rather than "a puerto rican".
That my dear is being racist, just like you said your Mom is.
Racist Mom, antisemitic uncle, yep, you fit right in with your obvious racism
and with your coddling up to Chris and other vehement antisemites in this
group.
You have been exposed as the racist I >>always knew you were.
lol!
Dani
I also find it funny that you slipped up and exposed yourself as to what you
really are.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Dani exposed as a racist |
14 Dec 2004 10:29:58 PM |
|
|
On 13 Dec 2004 13:48:11 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
What are you talking about? I married a white man with baby-blue eyes.
You
married a Puerto-Rican!
Damn, that statement sure smacks of >>racism.
LOL! Hey - where's the quoted text,
It's right there, doesn't matter what went before or after it, your words show
that you think it's much better thing that you married "a white man with
baby-blue eyes" rather than "a puerto rican".
No, Dummy. It does matter that you leave what was written before
and after - otherwise it's completely out of context (which I think
you know; you're dumb, but not that dumb.)
You were talking about the decline of the white race - I said I did
more to help prevent it than you did by marrying within my race; as
opposed to you who married outside of your race. And yet again I was
pointing out your hypocrisy.
If you really must know, I had a serious relationship with a Milado
(Irish mother/black father) when I was a teen (well, as serious as one
can be when they're a teen) - so I've never chosen who to date based
on race - rather based on who I liked.
That my dear is being racist, just like you said your Mom is.
Racist Mom, antisemitic uncle, yep, you fit right in with your obvious racism
Oh racist Mum.. anti-semitic Uncle? Ahhh.. well then there's all the
reason more for me *not* to be racist! What, do you think racism is
biological? LOL!
and with your coddling up to Chris and other vehement antisemites in this
group.
And "other" - for years that "other" would've been replaced with
Grantland, now wouldn't it have been? Now Grantland has been excluded
from your infamous "lists" because just recently it was *you* who was
"coddling" up to him because at that particular moment he fit your
agenda. Your *racist* agenda nonetheless.
You have been exposed as the racist I always knew you were.
lol!
I also find it funny that you slipped up and exposed yourself as to what you
really are.
I was (and still am) laughing at your idiocy and your hypocrisy; and
your transparant projection of your own guilt onto others.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Dani exposed as a racist |
15 Dec 2004 05:16:47 PM |
|
|
Did you mix up ethnicity to race? Ethnicity Latinos and White
Europeans are not the same? Racially they are.
The word Anti-Semite means anti-Arab Race. It takes on the connotation
of only the Jewish race today, but is [was] not used in its correct
form. Both Jews and Muslims come from an Arab patriarchal father -
Abraham. If one is anti- Semitic, then they are against all Semitic
people, who can be called by their other term Arabs. Yes, the Jews are
Arabs originally as pointed out by Jews in scholarly institutions.
I said I did more to help prevent it than you did by marrying within
my race
Tony did marry within his white race.
I had a serious relationship with a Milado (Irish mother/black father)
when I was a teen
You dated Mariah Carrey? Lucky you. She is a buy girl too ;)
!--Just joking lighten up. --
so I've never chosen who to date based on race - rather based on who I
liked.
If it's hot it's good, doesn't matter what color it comes in. ;)
Tony learned that. So why make that a point of contention? Your
argument is solid in an ethnic argument- but why complain about the
decline of the WR if one marries within ones race? Yet ..., Tony is
using College Scholarly Anthropology Studies to point out the four main
root races: Asian, African ( blacks), Caucasian ( White) and Arab.
Within the four root races are all the subdivisions, in which the
Latino group is within the White Race group. Therefore your argument,
if put to the scholarly context in anthropology standards makes Tony
still able to complain the way he does. May not be fair, a little
murky, but it is a recognized subdivision non-the-less.
I remember Peter Lemesurier point out ( Some took it as making fun)
Nostradamus's preferences to a racial aspect because he recommended to
a guy to date a black women for her better than average sexual
abilities in bed ( according to N.). Can't trust those prophets, now
can ya? ;)
Oh racist Mum.. anti-semitic Uncle? Ahhh.. well then there's all the
reason more for me *not* to be racist! What, do you think racism is
biological? LOL!
No he is pointing out social and not biological. You know, did some of
their racism (if true) rub off on you being exposed to it? Some
psychology classes make this a judgmental factor in predisposition
arguments . Personnaly, I have not seen a racist post from you so I
cannot say anythng at all here - but the white race, including the
Indians, Latinos and many other groups are not going to be wiped out
off the face of the earth as predicted. Although, there is a big
possibility that all the groups will be wiped out sooner than later if
we do not get a handle on the world's dire situation.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Dani exposed as a racist |
13 Dec 2004 07:54:26 AM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
What are you talking about? I married a white man with baby-blue eyes.
You
married a Puerto-Rican!
Damn, that statement sure smacks of >>racism.
LOL! Hey - where's the quoted text,
It's right there, doesn't matter what went before or after it, your words show
that you think it's much better thing that you married "a white man with
baby-blue eyes" rather than "a puerto rican".
That my dear is being racist, just like you said your Mom is.
Racist Mom, antisemitic uncle, yep, you fit right in with your obvious racism
and with your coddling up to Chris and other vehement antisemites in this
group.
You have been exposed as the racist I >>always knew you were.
lol!
Dani
I also find it funny that you slipped up and exposed yourself as to what you
really are.
Tony
Oh *****-off Tony, who exactly are you fooling with your childishly
pathetic snips, eh?
Can you find anyone to agree with you... anywhere?
Well, can you?
NO
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Dani exposed as a racist |
13 Dec 2004 09:31:10 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
What are you talking about? I >>>>>married a white man with baby-blue
eyes.
You married a Puerto-Rican!
Damn, that statement sure smacks >>>>of racism.
LOL! Hey - where's the quoted text,
It's right there, doesn't matter what went before or after it, your words
show
that you think it's much better thing that you married "a white man with
baby-blue eyes" rather than "a puerto rican".
That my dear is being racist, just like you said your Mom is.
Racist Mom, antisemitic uncle, yep, you fit right in with your obvious
racism
and with your coddling up to Chris and other vehement antisemites in this
group.
You have been exposed as the racist I >>always knew you were.
lol!
Dani
I also find it funny that you slipped up and exposed yourself as to what
you
really are.
Tony
Oh *****-off Tony,
Can't handle the truth, eh?
Dani's statement was clearly racist anyway you want to look at it.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Dani exposed as a racist |
13 Dec 2004 10:18:00 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041213103110.22097.00002240@mb-m06.aol.com...
Dani's statement was clearly racist anyway you want to look at it.
In your very humble opinion but as you're a proven liar and hypocrite
who believes anything you bleat about.
You're just trying to keep your own filthy racism, lies and hypocrisy
out of discussion by smearing anyone else you can, filth.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Dani exposed as a racist |
14 Dec 2004 04:18:04 AM |
|
|
"Krib" krib@address.invalid
wrote:
You're just trying to keep your own filthy >racism, lies and hypocrisy
out of discussion
Meranwhile you and most of this group want to continue to ignore the racist
staements by Dani and others.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Dani exposed as a racist |
14 Dec 2004 06:22:56 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041214051804.23255.00001818@mb-m03.aol.com...
"Krib" krib@address.invalid
wrote:
You're just trying to keep your own filthy >racism, lies and hypocrisy
out of discussion
Meranwhile you and most of this group want to continue to ignore the
racist
staements by Dani and others.
That's because they didn't make any, you gibbering fool.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Dani exposed as a racist |
14 Dec 2004 05:04:33 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041214051804.23255.00001818@mb-m03.aol.com...
You're just trying to keep your own filthy >racism, lies and hypocrisy
out of discussion
Meranwhile you and most of this group want to continue to ignore the
racist
staements by Dani and others.
I'd be happy to discuss them tone but I don't see what Dani said as being
racist, so feel free to explain how it is. I don't mean just your opinion, I
mean show exactly where and how she was being racist. Can you do that
tone? I'll assume your dodging this as proof that you're unable to do so.
Since we're on the subject do you also want to discuss your own hypocrisy
tone? want to share with me how it is you can accuse Dani and others of
being in cahoots, ('supporters' seems to be your favourite term), with
Grantland
purely because they respond to his posts? I assume you agree that you and
old ***** breath guernon doing the same thing means you are also 'supporters'
of his then? What's that tone? going to run away from this point *again*?
Come back to me when you actually have a point to make, filthy racist moron.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Trannyz ran away again (was: Dani exposed as a racist) |
24 Dec 2004 06:48:36 AM |
|
|
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:5Nzvd.34$876.14@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net...
Meranwhile you and most of this group want to continue to ignore the
racist staements by Dani and others.
I'd be happy to discuss them tone but I don't see what Dani said as being
racist, so feel free to explain how it is. I don't mean just your opinion,
I
mean show exactly where and how she was being racist. Can you do that
tone? I'll assume your dodging this as proof that you're unable to do so.
So just another in your endless series of lies eh you gutless windbag ;0)
Since we're on the subject do you also want to discuss your own hypocrisy
tone? want to share with me how it is you can accuse Dani and others of
being in cahoots, ('supporters' seems to be your favourite term), with
Grantland
purely because they respond to his posts? I assume you agree that you and
old ***** breath guernon doing the same thing means you are also
'supporters'
of his then? What's that tone? going to run away from this point *again*?
Hey what do you know, you *did* run away again, I'm a profit too ;0)
Come back to me when you actually have a point to make, filthy racist
moron.
Obviously you have no point do you fag ;0)
--
krib
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
