UN TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY
IS THAT ENOUGH?
By: SARTRE
As the Iraq quagmire deepens and the ensuing civil war broadens, what
is the role of the United Nations? Specific steps that need to be
taken are less important than the underpinnings that make up the
formula for “peace keeping” by the global community. The charter for
the UN rests not in a document of international agreement, but resides
within the quackery that gave substance to the creation of this world
body.
The movement to construct a global union, not only as a forum for
debate and dialogue, but as a super structure to administer and compel
sovereign nation states, is the crux of the fraud. Do you know your
history? Woodrow Wilson is given the accolades as patron for the
League of Nations, but it was Edward Mandell House who was the power
that assembled the Philip Dru: Administrator concept that drove the
ship of state. Bearing the honorary title of "colonel," which was
conferred upon him in appreciation of his skill in managing
gubernatorial campaigns in Texas, House played the game of politics
cannily, and he played to win. Sound familiar?
Without Wilson, internationalism would have a very different face.
Despised for its disguise as benevolence, the world has suffered under
the despotism of global governance as a direct result of this hoax.
Only the good sense of the U.S. Senate rejected the first attempt, but
succumbed to the Alger Hiss insurgent influence at the San Francisco
Conference that adopted the U.N. Charter. Just look at the record,
since the scheme was financed by John D. Rockefeller, Jr. with the
largess to the United Nations of $8.5 million in 1946 to purchase the
land on which the UN headquarters now sits.
You should know the drill by now, but that doesn’t prevent self
effacing politicians from invoking their support for the U.N. when
they have no other answers. The latest obscenity from this band of
globocrat thieves is the oil for food scam. Long chastised for their
opposition to this world parasite of elitist diplomats, in service to
their global masters, has been the John Birch Society. Polite "PC’
company demands labeling a Bircher a political leper. Why do the media
magnates of the popular culture fear the writings of a William F.
Jasper? The full details about the UN Oil-for-Food Program: Scams R Us
are presented for your review. Are the facts so difficult to
internalize that they must be denied in order to maintain your own
personal comfort zone?
Jasper writes: "It is bad enough that the gigantic fraud involved in
the UN-administered oil-for-food program robbed Iraqi and Kurdish
children of life-saving food and medicine and lined the pockets of UN
kleptocrats. But there may be much more to concern us as well.
According to some of the documents that have surfaced, large sums of
money from the program went to the Baathist Party militants and the
terrorists who have been murdering and wounding U.S. soldiers in
Iraq".
The systemic corruption within the U.N. organization is an observable
fact. Since the uproar over Kofi Annan’s stewardship has been
virtually mute, what are the prospects that enough courageous citizens
would demand that the United States abandon the entire notion that a
global union is desirable? Intrepid action is the only answer to fake
transparency and absent accountability. The U.N. can’t be reformed, it
needs to be dissolved, it’s the worst beast yet devised.
A Karl Rove residence is a modern day co-op of a "White Washed House".
The same title of Colonel is not necessary, when the interventionist
religion is practiced. Proclaiming that Middle East policy is a
beneficial unilateral national security strategy of necessity is
insulting. The trickery used is that the U.N. will be ignored, even at
the risk of a coalition of one . . . Nation building will be
accomplished using the deplorable delusions of the NeoCons employing
the muscle of the bipartisan War Party. How well is this tactic doing,
but more important, how does this course enhance your liberty and
ensure a better life for your children?
The U.N. is a horrible relic of sick minds. Wilson’s visions are
Bush’s excuses. The real war criminals are the Kofi Annan’s. Now we
are told to endure further indignity. President George W. Bush
announced his intention to loan the United Nations $1.2 billion to
refurbish the UN headquarters in New York City. The loan is contained
in the President’s 2005 Foreign Operations budget which totals $31.5
billion. Although UN officials lobbied for an interest-free loan, the
U.S. proposes to charge 5.5 percent interest on the 30-year loan which
would have to be approved by the U.S. Congress and the UN General
Assembly. Are Americans so stupid to think that assessments like the
Tobin Tax aren’t part of the globalist plan to impoverish the
productive and finance further intrusion? Internationalism is the
basis for the intellectual foundation of benign totalitarianism.
Who could forget Condoleezza Rice: "Had this president been aware that
terrorists would have used airplanes as missiles and attacked the
World Trade Center and the Pentagon, he would have acted on it". The
question that should be asked: What if one of those "airplane
missiles" had its guidance trajectory set for the U.N. tower? Would
there be less jingoism and would American troops be targeted occupiers
now in Iraq? Just maybe there would be a more sober motivation for
displaying all those flags!
A New American is needed to convince his confused citizen neighbors,
that only traditional solutions will work, that being the rejection of
Wilson’s legacy. Cleaning house - of all the little colonels - is an
obligation of every real American. Annan could be the last
Secretary-General, only if the U.S. terminates a terminable
relationship. A valid foreign policy must advance a republic not a
global gulag. Transparency and accountability originates within our
own waters edge. That’s the true battleground for the "War of Terror"
being waged upon our own people. Send the U.N to hell . . .
"Published originally at www.EtherZone.com : republication allowed
with this notice and hyperlink intact."
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
