Oh man, I just came across this on You Tube, this kid is too much. A
16 year old in Melbourne, Australia who threw a party where some 500
people showed up, the cops were called and when they came to the party
the kids started throwing beer bottles at their cop-cars (lol),
helicopters were flying above, the dog squad was called in - utter
chaos. Apparently the kids' parents were away on vacation and now
he's being fined 20 thousand dollars in damages.
This link below has him being interviewed by a news lady - the funny
part is his complete disregard for the entire mess. First of all, he
did the interview with his shirt wide open, showing his nipple rings,
wearing sunglasses that he refuses to take off when the news lady asks
him to "take off those glasses and apologize" - he refuses!
This is too much - you gotta see this kid.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qm61svN4U5g&feature=related
.
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
24 Jan 2008 02:11:06 PM |
|
|
On 24 Jan, 18:01, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Wow, I'm genuinely horrified! =EF=BF=BDI thought *everyone* knew this...tha=
t
it was a given - common knowledge. =EF=BF=BDGuess not."
Well, there you are Dani. Horrified you have to be. I stand by my
views, as you by yours.
I am discussing those occasions when a teen-aged girl makes concerted
advances, plots and plans to lure her chosen 'victim' into a private
place, and there to seduce him in a way that most men would find great
difficulty in opposing.
It happens a lot. Were it not for the girl's promiscuous behaviour,
then there would have been no contact.
Those circumstances call for punishing the child as much, if not more
than the man. It's easy to say, 'rebuff her'...in practice, the girls
are very skilled, very artful and very difficult to dislodge.
Temptation is strong on matters such as these. That temptation had
nothing to do with the man, and everything to do with the girl.
A child is deemed capable of 'aiding, abetting, counseling and
procuring' any offence. However, in practice, and in order to convict
the man, this law is not applied in these cases.
It should be.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
24 Jan 2008 02:27:11 PM |
|
|
Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Well, there you are
What a powerful observation. Well, cutting the retard
a little slack here...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "psychogaray" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
24 Jan 2008 04:42:57 PM |
|
|
"Werewolfy" <Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4bcfeec4-a015-4381-a200-3b4d88fe0ab5@c23g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On 24 Jan, 18:01, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Wow, I'm genuinely horrified! ?I thought *everyone* knew this...that
it was a given - common knowledge. ?Guess not."
Well, there you are Dani. Horrified you have to be. I stand by my
views, as you by yours.
I am discussing those occasions when a teen-aged girl makes concerted
advances, plots and plans to lure her chosen 'victim' into a private
place, and there to seduce him in a way that most men would find great
difficulty in opposing.
It happens a lot. Were it not for the girl's promiscuous behaviour,
then there would have been no contact.
Those circumstances call for punishing the child as much, if not more
than the man. It's easy to say, 'rebuff her'...in practice, the girls
are very skilled, very artful and very difficult to dislodge.
Temptation is strong on matters such as these. That temptation had
nothing to do with the man, and everything to do with the girl.
A child is deemed capable of 'aiding, abetting, counseling and
procuring' any offence. However, in practice, and in order to convict
the man, this law is not applied in these cases.
It should be.
Werewolfy
As an addendum to the thorny situation I'm immersed in with a 14 year old
Polish girl who wants to model for me (with her girlfriend who looks the
same age), she sent me 22 (!!) jpeg pics (hi resolution) of her in a string
bikini this morning, romping with her bikini-clad blonde friend in what
appears to be a secluded river bed area. They both flip the bird at the
camera in several pics.
She won't quit! I've gotten five messages from her in four days, including
one with animated gifs she made (seems to be computer savvy as hell!)
blowing kisses and disco dancing. She now signs her messages, "Love and
kisses for my dream man..." Much repetitive mention of "dreaming" --- for
example, "I seen you (sic) in dreams..." ..."I can not believe when I seen
your face, it was like dream I have (sic)..." Oh nooo. I haven't replied to
her at all!! She wants photos of me now. She asks about the one I have
posted -- she wants to be assured that it's really me.
At first, I thought this might be part of a prostitution ring in E. Europe,
luring me into spending money. Nooooo...she asks for nothing. No mention of
money. Just seductive lines. Photos of her with her older brother playing
soccer...photos of her cocker spaniel dog...photos of her on her motor bike
with her girlfriend (I suspect bisexuality). Up til now, she was wearing
street clothes. Altogether, I have exactly 31 photos! I expect a video
attachment at any time.
And...now...very revealing photos of her in a bikini so skimpy it could be
described as "two lil' strings." Ample breasts, great figure, cute face,
pouty lips, big eyes, long brown hair, tanned...oh jeez...the ***** jailbait
females put us guys through. This isn't fair. LOL! I should protest!!! This
is threatening my health. I could have another stroke from increased blood
pressure...:)~ I'm afraid to tell her to *****. She might go off her
rocker...(seriously)...I don't want it on my conscience. Since some girls
and boys have committed suicide over fantasy relationships lately (in the
news), I feel I need tact dealing with this determined kid. So, I am looking
over my options carefully. Jailbait hell.
garay ;)~~
.
|
|
|
| User: "psychogaray" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
24 Jan 2008 05:20:32 PM |
|
|
"psychogaray" <psychovideo@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:go6dndaSbOfviQTanZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"Werewolfy" <Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4bcfeec4-a015-4381-a200-3b4d88fe0ab5@c23g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On 24 Jan, 18:01, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Wow, I'm genuinely horrified! ?I thought *everyone* knew this...that
it was a given - common knowledge. ?Guess not."
Well, there you are Dani. Horrified you have to be. I stand by my
views, as you by yours.
I am discussing those occasions when a teen-aged girl makes concerted
advances, plots and plans to lure her chosen 'victim' into a private
place, and there to seduce him in a way that most men would find great
difficulty in opposing.
It happens a lot. Were it not for the girl's promiscuous behaviour,
then there would have been no contact.
Those circumstances call for punishing the child as much, if not more
than the man. It's easy to say, 'rebuff her'...in practice, the girls
are very skilled, very artful and very difficult to dislodge.
Temptation is strong on matters such as these. That temptation had
nothing to do with the man, and everything to do with the girl.
A child is deemed capable of 'aiding, abetting, counseling and
procuring' any offence. However, in practice, and in order to convict
the man, this law is not applied in these cases.
It should be.
Werewolfy
As an addendum to the thorny situation I'm immersed in with a 14 year old
Polish girl who wants to model for me (with her girlfriend who looks the
same age), she sent me 22 (!!) jpeg pics (hi resolution) of her in a
string bikini this morning, romping with her bikini-clad blonde friend in
what appears to be a secluded river bed area. They both flip the bird at
the camera in several pics.
She won't quit! I've gotten five messages from her in four days, including
one with animated gifs she made (seems to be computer savvy as hell!)
blowing kisses and disco dancing. She now signs her messages, "Love and
kisses for my dream man..." Much repetitive mention of "dreaming" --- for
example, "I seen you (sic) in dreams..." ..."I can not believe when I seen
your face, it was like dream I have (sic)..." Oh nooo. I haven't replied
to her at all!! She wants photos of me now. She asks about the one I have
posted -- she wants to be assured that it's really me.
At first, I thought this might be part of a prostitution ring in E.
Europe, luring me into spending money. Nooooo...she asks for nothing. No
mention of money. Just seductive lines. Photos of her with her older
brother playing soccer...photos of her cocker spaniel dog...photos of her
on her motor bike with her girlfriend (I suspect bisexuality). Up til now,
she was wearing street clothes. Altogether, I have exactly 31 photos! I
expect a video attachment at any time.
And...now...very revealing photos of her in a bikini so skimpy it could be
described as "two lil' strings." Ample breasts, great figure, cute face,
pouty lips, big eyes, long brown hair, tanned...oh jeez...the *****
jailbait females put us guys through. This isn't fair. LOL! I should
protest!!! This is threatening my health. I could have another stroke from
increased blood pressure...:)~ I'm afraid to tell her to *****. She
might go off her rocker...(seriously)...I don't want it on my conscience.
Since some girls and boys have committed suicide over fantasy
relationships lately (in the news), I feel I need tact dealing with this
determined kid. So, I am looking over my options carefully. Jailbait
hell.
garay ;)~~
Oh my god...well, I just got that message off and here comes more photos
from her!
Now she's in various stage or holiday costumes, mostly by herself. 11 more
jpegs!! I'm up to 42 pics so far. All in four days. First photos of her
smoking a pot pipe, blowing smoke at the lens and making funny faces.
Sheeesh...she sent along her sixth message in four days, and now asks why
I've not replied so far. "I wait on you for reply...I am anxious with you
(sic)...please do not make me very sad...I dream of you ...you and me is
real good together (sic)..."
The Alice hippie girl anime I put up seems to have spurred her references to
drugs. She hadn't mentioned any drugs previously. She makes a reference to
that video, saying it was "...cute...sexy...makes me laugh" and then asks
whether the hippie girl anime was based on a real girl I know or knew,
saying "...if you like Alice girl, you like me much (sic)..." Her English is
a bit broken, but not bad at times. It varies in quality.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
24 Jan 2008 05:22:21 PM |
|
|
On 24 Jan, 22:42, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
"Jailbait hell."
Exactly Gary, exactly. This seems to have become a gender devide.
Stephen, of course, has thrown his morality in with the women. That's
no suprise really.
No one has said it is right for an adult to have sex with a consensual
teenage *****. My point is that the ***** is well aware of what she is
doing, and should be brought to justice too. As the instigator, she
should also be the more severely punished...if punishment is deemed
desirable by Society. That of course, is another matter altogether. It
depends on the Society, as you have rightly pointed out.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
25 Jan 2008 09:00:24 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:22:21 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 24 Jan, 22:42, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
"Jailbait hell."
Exactly Gary, exactly. This seems to have become a gender devide.
Stephen, of course, has thrown his morality in with the women. That's
no suprise really.
There's no "gender divide" - I clearly told you that the same would
apply if we were talking about a 14 year old boy and a fully grown,
adult woman.
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
24 Jan 2008 02:33:34 PM |
|
|
On Jan 24, 12:11 pm, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 24 Jan, 18:01, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Wow, I'm genuinely horrified! =EF=BF=BDI thought *everyone* knew this...t=
hat
it was a given - common knowledge. =EF=BF=BDGuess not."
Well, there you are Dani. Horrified you have to be. I stand by my
views, as you by yours.
I am discussing those occasions when a teen-aged girl makes concerted
advances, plots and plans to lure her chosen 'victim' into a private
place, and there to seduce him in a way that most men would find great
difficulty in opposing.
It happens a lot. Were it not for the girl's promiscuous behaviour,
then there would have been no contact.
Those circumstances call for punishing the child as much, if not more
than the man. It's easy to say, 'rebuff her'...in practice, the girls
are very skilled, very artful and very difficult to dislodge.
Temptation is strong on matters such as these. That temptation had
nothing to do with the man, and everything to do with the girl.
A child is deemed capable of 'aiding, abetting, counseling and
procuring' any offence. However, in practice, and in order to convict
the man, this law is not applied in these cases.
It should be.
I notice you dodged one of Dani's questions, so I'll repost it for
your consideration: "In the UK, if a 14 year old and say...a 45 year
old both committed a crime together, would they be punished equally by
law? Would they get the same jail sentence?"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
24 Jan 2008 05:07:34 PM |
|
|
On 24 Jan, 20:33, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
I notice you dodged one of Dani's questions, so I'll repost it for
your consideration: "In the UK, if a 14 year old and say...a 45 year
old both committed a crime together, would they be punished equally by
law? =EF=BF=BDWould they get the same jail sentence
No gaol sentence (please spell gaol correctly) but the man would in
normal circumstances be fined or have a probation order.
As the girl would not be appearing as a defendent, but used as a
witness, the penalty question for her does not arise. It should
do...but I have already said that.
If you want to discuss a different crime, for example theft..then it
is unlikely since they could not appear before the same court. It's
quite possible the girl would have a custodial sentence and the man a
fine if she had several previous convictions and he had none.
The question was not dodged. You choose your words badly. Actually,
that isn't so, you chose them with the hope of denigrating the person
you are addressing. That's what I mean when I called you venomous. I
am at liberty to restrict my replies to that which I see fit to reply
to, in order not to make the post over-long.
You are venomous Stephen. A snake slithering amongst us pretending to
be harmless.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
24 Jan 2008 07:08:44 PM |
|
|
On Jan 24, 3:07 pm, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 24 Jan, 20:33, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
I notice you dodged one of Dani's questions, so I'll repost it for
your consideration: "In the UK, if a 14 year old and say...a 45 year
old both committed a crime together, would they be punished equally by
law? =EF=BF=BDWould they get the same jail sentence
No gaol sentence (please spell gaol correctly)
We say jail over here. We also call a "lift" and elevator. And the
"bonnet" of a car is a hood. We say 9/11, you say 11/9. You don't
speak English exactly as Englishmen did in the 18th century, do you?
Why should we?
but the man would in
normal circumstances be fined or have a probation order.
As the girl would not be appearing as a defendent, but used as a
witness, the penalty question for her does not arise. It should
do...but I have already said that.
If you want to discuss a different crime, for example theft..then it
is unlikely since they could not appear before the same court. It's
quite possible the girl would have a custodial sentence and the man a
fine if she had several previous convictions and he had none.
Over here, in addition to any other charges, he'd be charged with
contributing to the delinquency of a minor. You see, when an adult and
a child willingly do anything together, the adult is always the
responsible person. It is the responsibility of the adult to guide the
child in the proper direction.
The question was not dodged. You choose your words badly. Actually,
that isn't so, you chose them with the hope of denigrating the person
you are addressing. That's what I mean when I called you venomous.
Yet you converse with other posters about me with an even *more*
venomous tone. Hypocrite.
I am at liberty to restrict my replies to that which I see fit to reply
to, in order not to make the post over-long.
Of course. But I read Dani's question, and I wondered how you'd deal
with it. You dealt with it the way you dealt with my first mention of
the *information* encoded in the DNA molecule. You simply ignored it
as if it hadn't been mentioned.
You are venomous Stephen. A snake slithering amongst us pretending to
be harmless.
I'm not pretending to be anything. And believe me, I intend you no
harm. I'm the guy who prayed for you (sincerely, and with your
permission) when you had a health issue arise. I wish you only the
best of health, always.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
24 Jan 2008 07:44:43 PM |
|
|
On 25 Jan, 01:08, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
" You dealt with it the way you dealt with my first mention of the
*information* encoded in the DNA molecule. You simply ignored it as if
it hadn't been mentioned."
I respond to that which I consider to be pertinant. I rather fancy
most people do. Neither Dani's hypothetical question, nor your
definition of 'evidence' using DNA information warranted a reply.
I certainly did not ignore it. How on Earth do you know that? What I
didn't do was to write about it. Presuming again Stephen.
Incidently, why mention the 18th Century when discussing language
differences? The language is English and should be spoken as an
Englishman speaks it. Your bastardisation of it does nothing for the
fine qualities the language has. The Indian sub-continent to a large
extent have also failed to master the language properly and speak an
odd sort of pidgin English for much of what they say. You are
similar...your English is poor, your spelling attrocious and your
grammar almost non-existant.
Before you ask, your= Americans in general.
Werewolfy
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
24 Jan 2008 11:21:53 PM |
|
|
On Jan 24, 5:44 pm, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 25 Jan, 01:08, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
" You dealt with it the way you dealt with my first mention of the
*information* encoded in the DNA molecule. You simply ignored it as if
it hadn't been mentioned."
I respond to that which I consider to be pertinant. I rather fancy
most people do. Neither Dani's hypothetical question, nor your
definition of 'evidence' using DNA information warranted a reply.
Actually they did, but of course it's your choice to ignore them.
I certainly did not ignore it. How on Earth do you know that? What I
didn't do was to write about it. Presuming again Stephen.
You ignored them in your responses.
Incidently, why mention the 18th Century when discussing language
differences? The language is English and should be spoken as an
Englishman speaks it.
Because we gained our independence in the 18th century. Do you still
speak English as an Englishman spoke it in the 18th century? Neither
do we. That each country's version of the language has gradually
changed (in slightly different directions) over the course of 200+
years is perfectly normal.
Your bastardisation of it does nothing for the
fine qualities the language has. The Indian sub-continent to a large
extent have also failed to master the language properly and speak an
odd sort of pidgin English for much of what they say. You are
similar...your English is poor, your spelling attrocious and your
grammar almost non-existant.
There is so much irony in that paragraph that I'll just let it go
without further comment.
Before you ask, your= Americans in general.
Yes, I assumed that.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
25 Jan 2008 08:54:54 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:07:34 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 24 Jan, 20:33, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
I notice you dodged one of Dani's questions, so I'll repost it for
your consideration: "In the UK, if a 14 year old and say...a 45 year
old both committed a crime together, would they be punished equally by
law? ?Would they get the same jail sentence
No gaol sentence (please spell gaol correctly)
He did spell it correctly! And so did I. Sorry, we call it JAIL
here.
Kinda arrogant of you to suggest that people who were born and raised
on *a different continent* should spell, write and talk like you,
isn't it?
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
25 Jan 2008 09:32:31 AM |
|
|
On 25 Jan, 14:54, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Kinda arrogant of you to suggest that people who were born and raised
on *a different continent* should spell, write and talk like you,
isn't it?
Not at all. By the way, it's 'kind of'...not 'kinda'.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
25 Jan 2008 10:07:35 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:32:31 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 25 Jan, 14:54, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Kinda arrogant of you to suggest that people who were born and raised
on *a different continent* should spell, write and talk like you,
isn't it?
Not at all. By the way, it's 'kind of'...not 'kinda'.
LOL! Yeah, I know that.
But did you know that it's *surprise* (with an R), and not "suprise"?
And it's *divide* - not "devide" .. ;)
Hope that helps!
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
25 Jan 2008 01:05:51 PM |
|
|
On 25 Jan, 16:07, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
" Hope that helps!"
It does, and yes, I did know that. Neither my typing skills, nor my
spelling skills are of a high standard, sadly.
I will wear the cloak of repentence tonight, a cloak that irritates
and hurts. Will a period of 24 hours be enough to purge my sin?
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
25 Jan 2008 01:24:23 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:05:51 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 25 Jan, 16:07, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
" Hope that helps!"
It does, and yes, I did know that. Neither my typing skills, nor my
spelling skills are of a high standard, sadly.
I will wear the cloak of repentence tonight, a cloak that irritates
and hurts. Will a period of 24 hours be enough to purge my sin?
I couldn't care less how you write, talk or type. And I certainly
don't expect you to adopt an American accent or an American style
of spelling certain words etc.. it's you who expects that I (somehow)
should have a British accent and a British style of writing! LOL!
Nah.. I have tolerance for people that aren't the same as me.
I would've never commented on your writing mistakes if you didn't
stick yer nose up in the air and comment on mine.
PS: "yer" is on purpose!
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
25 Jan 2008 08:35:29 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:11:06 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 24 Jan, 18:01, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Wow, I'm genuinely horrified! ?I thought *everyone* knew this...that
it was a given - common knowledge. ?Guess not."
Well, there you are Dani. Horrified you have to be.
I'm horrified that you believe this way...but *very* thankful that the
law does not agree with you.
I stand by my
views, as you by yours.
Yup, and parents world-wide are also standing by me if they're reading
this I'm sure! LOL!
I am discussing those occasions when a teen-aged girl makes concerted
advances, plots and plans to lure her chosen 'victim' into a private
place, and there to seduce him in a way that most men would find great
difficulty in opposing.
It happens a lot. Were it not for the girl's promiscuous behaviour,
then there would have been no contact.
Yeah, and if it wasn't for all that *tempting* delicious looking food
so many wouldn't be fat! And if that wife would just have shut her
mouth, she wouldn't have gotten beaten by her husband! And if that
damned 7 year old kid would've just picked up his toys, he wouldn't
have gotten hit with the whip! And if that little 2 year old baby
would've just kept her diaper on - she wouldn't have been such a
temptation to that child-molester! And if those drugs weren't so
readily available and cheap on the street - well by God he wouldn't be
a drug-addict today, now would he! Oh, and take that alcohol outta
the liquor store! Too much of a temptation...we'll all be alcoholics!
Christ, Ricky - there is *temptation* in so many forms out there. And
everyone has there own "demons" and everyone is tempted by something
or other that isn't good for us...but we can't blame the temptation;
we have to blame our lack of self-control, rather.
Those circumstances call for punishing the child as much, if not more
than the man.
This is getting ridiculous. We're talking about a 14 year old here!
It's easy to say, 'rebuff her'...in practice, the girls
are very skilled, very artful and very difficult to dislodge.
Well, it's a sad day when a 14 year old can out-smart a fully grown,
adult man. And it's an even sadder day when that man then blames the
kid because she was just too "smart" and she was just too much of a
temptation!
This conversation is getting revolting.
Temptation is strong on matters such as these. That temptation had
nothing to do with the man, and everything to do with the girl.
Oh *****! "nothing to do with the man" - that is not only pompous
and arrogant of you to say...it's suggesting that a 14 year old is
somehow far more intelligent, far more mature, far more advanced, and
far more educated in the world of mind games than a grown adult is!
Now, we're talking about a 14 year old girl - someone who more than
likely, just two years prior was playing with BARBIE DOLLS and
sleeping with stuffed animals!
A child is deemed capable of 'aiding, abetting, counseling and
procuring' any offence.
Right, right...and the adult is the victim! Sure.
However, in practice, and in order to convict
the man, this law is not applied in these cases.
....thank the LORD!
It should be.
No, it absolutely should not be. Next you'll have 14 year olds able
to drive, drink, vote - hell, why not run for president! Why not?
They're unbelievably clever and all.
Pffffffffft!
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "psychogaray" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
25 Jan 2008 09:17:52 AM |
|
|
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:66rjp3tcf4fbi4vr53b4c3s05dpdajqbmf@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:11:06 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 24 Jan, 18:01, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Wow, I'm genuinely horrified! ?I thought *everyone* knew this...that
it was a given - common knowledge. ?Guess not."
Well, there you are Dani. Horrified you have to be.
I'm horrified that you believe this way...but *very* thankful that the
law does not agree with you.
I stand by my
views, as you by yours.
Yup, and parents world-wide are also standing by me if they're reading
this I'm sure! LOL!
I am discussing those occasions when a teen-aged girl makes concerted
advances, plots and plans to lure her chosen 'victim' into a private
place, and there to seduce him in a way that most men would find great
difficulty in opposing.
It happens a lot. Were it not for the girl's promiscuous behaviour,
then there would have been no contact.
Yeah, and if it wasn't for all that *tempting* delicious looking food
so many wouldn't be fat! And if that wife would just have shut her
mouth, she wouldn't have gotten beaten by her husband! And if that
damned 7 year old kid would've just picked up his toys, he wouldn't
have gotten hit with the whip! And if that little 2 year old baby
would've just kept her diaper on - she wouldn't have been such a
temptation to that child-molester! And if those drugs weren't so
readily available and cheap on the street - well by God he wouldn't be
a drug-addict today, now would he! Oh, and take that alcohol outta
the liquor store! Too much of a temptation...we'll all be alcoholics!
Christ, Ricky - there is *temptation* in so many forms out there. And
everyone has there own "demons" and everyone is tempted by something
or other that isn't good for us...but we can't blame the temptation;
we have to blame our lack of self-control, rather.
Those circumstances call for punishing the child as much, if not more
than the man.
This is getting ridiculous. We're talking about a 14 year old here!
It's easy to say, 'rebuff her'...in practice, the girls
are very skilled, very artful and very difficult to dislodge.
Well, it's a sad day when a 14 year old can out-smart a fully grown,
adult man. And it's an even sadder day when that man then blames the
kid because she was just too "smart" and she was just too much of a
temptation!
This conversation is getting revolting.
Temptation is strong on matters such as these. That temptation had
nothing to do with the man, and everything to do with the girl.
Oh *****! "nothing to do with the man" - that is not only pompous
and arrogant of you to say...it's suggesting that a 14 year old is
somehow far more intelligent, far more mature, far more advanced, and
far more educated in the world of mind games than a grown adult is!
Now, we're talking about a 14 year old girl - someone who more than
likely, just two years prior was playing with BARBIE DOLLS and
sleeping with stuffed animals!
A child is deemed capable of 'aiding, abetting, counseling and
procuring' any offence.
Right, right...and the adult is the victim! Sure.
However, in practice, and in order to convict
the man, this law is not applied in these cases.
...thank the LORD!
It should be.
No, it absolutely should not be. Next you'll have 14 year olds able
to drive, drink, vote - hell, why not run for president! Why not?
They're unbelievably clever and all.
Pffffffffft!
Dani
Well, it's true, Dani dear, that 14 year olds aren't as "experienced" at
manipulating adults as adults are with manipulating kids or even other
adults. We're all into some manipulation to get what we think we really want
at that opportune moment.
But, it's also true that 14 year olds, 15, 16, 17...know when an adult wants
something really bad, and they have something to "trade" to get what they
want from the adult.
Kids want a lot of things. Like adults. Their want list is quite long,
forever changing. Like adults. They lie, steal, cheat, manipulate, act
out...just like adults do. Some are more clever than others, of course, and
the more clever kids can get a nice lil' business 'deal' with an adult --
exchanging sex for money, drugs, material things, or sex itself -- and they
do it all the time. Everywhere. In the neighborhoods, the schools, the
internet, you name it.
We're talking about two manipulative human beings in bad need of wanting
something -- and the consensual deal that is made to satisfy both. We're NOT
talking about rape, molestation, or even perversion -- what is perverted
about wanting young bodies and young bodies wanting something or another
from old bodies?
It's all wanting...and it never ceases in humanity, Dani. Now, you say that
might be true, but we have will power to oppose it. Why oppose what we think
we want so badly when it's offered? Sure, people go off to prison. The
punishment is there. It's real, alright. But, the wanting is more powerful
often than the fear of punishment because we're talkin' about...>>SEX!! It's
not a perversion for consenting people. It's not a violent sport. Not
warfare. Nor corporate exploitation and greed. Not environmental pollution.
Not forced sex or rape. Not stealing. Not racism, or religious hypocrisy,
political tyranny, economic snobbery....
No, it's just two horny fucking people getting it on with each other and
satisfying their immediate carnal wantonness. And what the *****, Dani, is so
horrible about that?
That you want some lawmakers to determine what ages we're supposed to link
up and *****? It's a dream. People don't care if they want something badly
enough, they're take the chances...as you can see, everyday, the news is
replete with these stories.
So many terrible things humans do to each other, by force, coercion, lying,
domination...hatred and racism and religious bigotry every fucking day...and
we're supposed to get our underwear in a twist over a 50 year old man
screwing a consenting teen-ager?
My, my...civilization must be coming down on our lil' heads for such acts
against God, against Man, against all that is *good and decent* -- as
leaders go free after tens of thousands of innocents are laid away in early
graves over a threat that was non-existent? Those prematurely dead folks
won't have to *worry* about the immorality or amorality of sexual liaisons,
Dani...they won't have to think how 'awful' it is to *****...they're fucking
days were cut short by greed, fanaticism, idiocy, et al.
Yes, this conversation is getting sickening...you're right on that account.
garay :))~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
25 Jan 2008 10:00:35 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:17:52 -0800, "psychogaray"
<psychovideo@comcast.net> wrote:
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:66rjp3tcf4fbi4vr53b4c3s05dpdajqbmf@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:11:06 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 24 Jan, 18:01, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Wow, I'm genuinely horrified! ?I thought *everyone* knew this...that
it was a given - common knowledge. ?Guess not."
Well, there you are Dani. Horrified you have to be.
I'm horrified that you believe this way...but *very* thankful that the
law does not agree with you.
I stand by my
views, as you by yours.
Yup, and parents world-wide are also standing by me if they're reading
this I'm sure! LOL!
I am discussing those occasions when a teen-aged girl makes concerted
advances, plots and plans to lure her chosen 'victim' into a private
place, and there to seduce him in a way that most men would find great
difficulty in opposing.
It happens a lot. Were it not for the girl's promiscuous behaviour,
then there would have been no contact.
Yeah, and if it wasn't for all that *tempting* delicious looking food
so many wouldn't be fat! And if that wife would just have shut her
mouth, she wouldn't have gotten beaten by her husband! And if that
damned 7 year old kid would've just picked up his toys, he wouldn't
have gotten hit with the whip! And if that little 2 year old baby
would've just kept her diaper on - she wouldn't have been such a
temptation to that child-molester! And if those drugs weren't so
readily available and cheap on the street - well by God he wouldn't be
a drug-addict today, now would he! Oh, and take that alcohol outta
the liquor store! Too much of a temptation...we'll all be alcoholics!
Christ, Ricky - there is *temptation* in so many forms out there. And
everyone has there own "demons" and everyone is tempted by something
or other that isn't good for us...but we can't blame the temptation;
we have to blame our lack of self-control, rather.
Those circumstances call for punishing the child as much, if not more
than the man.
This is getting ridiculous. We're talking about a 14 year old here!
It's easy to say, 'rebuff her'...in practice, the girls
are very skilled, very artful and very difficult to dislodge.
Well, it's a sad day when a 14 year old can out-smart a fully grown,
adult man. And it's an even sadder day when that man then blames the
kid because she was just too "smart" and she was just too much of a
temptation!
This conversation is getting revolting.
Temptation is strong on matters such as these. That temptation had
nothing to do with the man, and everything to do with the girl.
Oh *****! "nothing to do with the man" - that is not only pompous
and arrogant of you to say...it's suggesting that a 14 year old is
somehow far more intelligent, far more mature, far more advanced, and
far more educated in the world of mind games than a grown adult is!
Now, we're talking about a 14 year old girl - someone who more than
likely, just two years prior was playing with BARBIE DOLLS and
sleeping with stuffed animals!
A child is deemed capable of 'aiding, abetting, counseling and
procuring' any offence.
Right, right...and the adult is the victim! Sure.
However, in practice, and in order to convict
the man, this law is not applied in these cases.
...thank the LORD!
It should be.
No, it absolutely should not be. Next you'll have 14 year olds able
to drive, drink, vote - hell, why not run for president! Why not?
They're unbelievably clever and all.
Pffffffffft!
Dani
Well, it's true, Dani dear, that 14 year olds aren't as "experienced" at
manipulating adults as adults are with manipulating kids or even other
adults. We're all into some manipulation to get what we think we really want
at that opportune moment.
But, it's also true that 14 year olds, 15, 16, 17...know when an adult wants
something really bad, and they have something to "trade" to get what they
want from the adult.
Kids want a lot of things. Like adults. Their want list is quite long,
forever changing. Like adults. They lie, steal, cheat, manipulate, act
out...just like adults do. Some are more clever than others, of course, and
the more clever kids can get a nice lil' business 'deal' with an adult --
exchanging sex for money, drugs, material things, or sex itself -- and they
do it all the time. Everywhere. In the neighborhoods, the schools, the
internet, you name it.
We're talking about two manipulative human beings in bad need of wanting
something -- and the consensual deal that is made to satisfy both. We're NOT
talking about rape, molestation, or even perversion -- what is perverted
about wanting young bodies and young bodies wanting something or another
from old bodies?
It's all wanting...and it never ceases in humanity, Dani. Now, you say that
might be true, but we have will power to oppose it. Why oppose what we think
we want so badly when it's offered? Sure, people go off to prison. The
punishment is there. It's real, alright. But, the wanting is more powerful
often than the fear of punishment because we're talkin' about...>>SEX!! It's
not a perversion for consenting people. It's not a violent sport. Not
warfare. Nor corporate exploitation and greed. Not environmental pollution.
Not forced sex or rape. Not stealing. Not racism, or religious hypocrisy,
political tyranny, economic snobbery....
No, it's just two horny fucking people getting it on with each other and
satisfying their immediate carnal wantonness. And what the *****, Dani, is so
horrible about that?
That you want some lawmakers to determine what ages we're supposed to link
up and *****? It's a dream. People don't care if they want something badly
enough, they're take the chances...as you can see, everyday, the news is
replete with these stories.
So many terrible things humans do to each other, by force, coercion, lying,
domination...hatred and racism and religious bigotry every fucking day...and
we're supposed to get our underwear in a twist over a 50 year old man
screwing a consenting teen-ager?
My, my...civilization must be coming down on our lil' heads for such acts
against God, against Man, against all that is *good and decent* -- as
leaders go free after tens of thousands of innocents are laid away in early
graves over a threat that was non-existent? Those prematurely dead folks
won't have to *worry* about the immorality or amorality of sexual liaisons,
Dani...they won't have to think how 'awful' it is to *****...they're fucking
days were cut short by greed, fanaticism, idiocy, et al.
Yes, this conversation is getting sickening...you're right on that account.
Sorry, Doc - but I'm right on all accounts. Child-molesters also
*want* children - rapists *want* to rape - murderers *want* to murder,
fat people *want* food - drug-addicts *want* drugs - abusers *want* to
abuse etc.. etc..
In our country we have the term *Statutory rapist* apllied to the man
or woman who WANTS to have sex with underage kids!
Don't like the law? Move.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "psychogaray" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
25 Jan 2008 01:14:24 PM |
|
|
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ae1kp39rlbk672sntm8j1qmiql6k5l49vs@4ax.com...
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:17:52 -0800, "psychogaray"
<psychovideo@comcast.net> wrote:
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:66rjp3tcf4fbi4vr53b4c3s05dpdajqbmf@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:11:06 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 24 Jan, 18:01, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Wow, I'm genuinely horrified! ?I thought *everyone* knew this...that
it was a given - common knowledge. ?Guess not."
Well, there you are Dani. Horrified you have to be.
I'm horrified that you believe this way...but *very* thankful that the
law does not agree with you.
I stand by my
views, as you by yours.
Yup, and parents world-wide are also standing by me if they're reading
this I'm sure! LOL!
I am discussing those occasions when a teen-aged girl makes concerted
advances, plots and plans to lure her chosen 'victim' into a private
place, and there to seduce him in a way that most men would find great
difficulty in opposing.
It happens a lot. Were it not for the girl's promiscuous behaviour,
then there would have been no contact.
Yeah, and if it wasn't for all that *tempting* delicious looking food
so many wouldn't be fat! And if that wife would just have shut her
mouth, she wouldn't have gotten beaten by her husband! And if that
damned 7 year old kid would've just picked up his toys, he wouldn't
have gotten hit with the whip! And if that little 2 year old baby
would've just kept her diaper on - she wouldn't have been such a
temptation to that child-molester! And if those drugs weren't so
readily available and cheap on the street - well by God he wouldn't be
a drug-addict today, now would he! Oh, and take that alcohol outta
the liquor store! Too much of a temptation...we'll all be alcoholics!
Christ, Ricky - there is *temptation* in so many forms out there. And
everyone has there own "demons" and everyone is tempted by something
or other that isn't good for us...but we can't blame the temptation;
we have to blame our lack of self-control, rather.
Those circumstances call for punishing the child as much, if not more
than the man.
This is getting ridiculous. We're talking about a 14 year old here!
It's easy to say, 'rebuff her'...in practice, the girls
are very skilled, very artful and very difficult to dislodge.
Well, it's a sad day when a 14 year old can out-smart a fully grown,
adult man. And it's an even sadder day when that man then blames the
kid because she was just too "smart" and she was just too much of a
temptation!
This conversation is getting revolting.
Temptation is strong on matters such as these. That temptation had
nothing to do with the man, and everything to do with the girl.
Oh *****! "nothing to do with the man" - that is not only pompous
and arrogant of you to say...it's suggesting that a 14 year old is
somehow far more intelligent, far more mature, far more advanced, and
far more educated in the world of mind games than a grown adult is!
Now, we're talking about a 14 year old girl - someone who more than
likely, just two years prior was playing with BARBIE DOLLS and
sleeping with stuffed animals!
A child is deemed capable of 'aiding, abetting, counseling and
procuring' any offence.
Right, right...and the adult is the victim! Sure.
However, in practice, and in order to convict
the man, this law is not applied in these cases.
...thank the LORD!
It should be.
No, it absolutely should not be. Next you'll have 14 year olds able
to drive, drink, vote - hell, why not run for president! Why not?
They're unbelievably clever and all.
Pffffffffft!
Dani
Well, it's true, Dani dear, that 14 year olds aren't as "experienced" at
manipulating adults as adults are with manipulating kids or even other
adults. We're all into some manipulation to get what we think we really
want
at that opportune moment.
But, it's also true that 14 year olds, 15, 16, 17...know when an adult
wants
something really bad, and they have something to "trade" to get what they
want from the adult.
Kids want a lot of things. Like adults. Their want list is quite long,
forever changing. Like adults. They lie, steal, cheat, manipulate, act
out...just like adults do. Some are more clever than others, of course,
and
the more clever kids can get a nice lil' business 'deal' with an adult --
exchanging sex for money, drugs, material things, or sex itself -- and
they
do it all the time. Everywhere. In the neighborhoods, the schools, the
internet, you name it.
We're talking about two manipulative human beings in bad need of wanting
something -- and the consensual deal that is made to satisfy both. We're
NOT
talking about rape, molestation, or even perversion -- what is perverted
about wanting young bodies and young bodies wanting something or another
from old bodies?
It's all wanting...and it never ceases in humanity, Dani. Now, you say
that
might be true, but we have will power to oppose it. Why oppose what we
think
we want so badly when it's offered? Sure, people go off to prison. The
punishment is there. It's real, alright. But, the wanting is more powerful
often than the fear of punishment because we're talkin' about...>>SEX!!
It's
not a perversion for consenting people. It's not a violent sport. Not
warfare. Nor corporate exploitation and greed. Not environmental
pollution.
Not forced sex or rape. Not stealing. Not racism, or religious hypocrisy,
political tyranny, economic snobbery....
No, it's just two horny fucking people getting it on with each other and
satisfying their immediate carnal wantonness. And what the *****, Dani, is
so
horrible about that?
That you want some lawmakers to determine what ages we're supposed to link
up and *****? It's a dream. People don't care if they want something badly
enough, they're take the chances...as you can see, everyday, the news is
replete with these stories.
So many terrible things humans do to each other, by force, coercion,
lying,
domination...hatred and racism and religious bigotry every fucking
day...and
we're supposed to get our underwear in a twist over a 50 year old man
screwing a consenting teen-ager?
My, my...civilization must be coming down on our lil' heads for such acts
against God, against Man, against all that is *good and decent* -- as
leaders go free after tens of thousands of innocents are laid away in
early
graves over a threat that was non-existent? Those prematurely dead folks
won't have to *worry* about the immorality or amorality of sexual
liaisons,
Dani...they won't have to think how 'awful' it is to *****...they're
fucking
days were cut short by greed, fanaticism, idiocy, et al.
Yes, this conversation is getting sickening...you're right on that
account.
Sorry, Doc - but I'm right on all accounts. Child-molesters also
*want* children - rapists *want* to rape - murderers *want* to murder,
fat people *want* food - drug-addicts *want* drugs - abusers *want* to
abuse etc.. etc..
In our country we have the term *Statutory rapist* apllied to the man
or woman who WANTS to have sex with underage kids!
Don't like the law? Move.
Dani
Well, not to Boston, that's for sure.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
25 Jan 2008 01:26:09 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:14:24 -0800, "psychogaray"
<psychovideo@comcast.net> wrote:
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ae1kp39rlbk672sntm8j1qmiql6k5l49vs@4ax.com...
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:17:52 -0800, "psychogaray"
<psychovideo@comcast.net> wrote:
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:66rjp3tcf4fbi4vr53b4c3s05dpdajqbmf@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:11:06 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 24 Jan, 18:01, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Wow, I'm genuinely horrified! ?I thought *everyone* knew this...that
it was a given - common knowledge. ?Guess not."
Well, there you are Dani. Horrified you have to be.
I'm horrified that you believe this way...but *very* thankful that the
law does not agree with you.
I stand by my
views, as you by yours.
Yup, and parents world-wide are also standing by me if they're reading
this I'm sure! LOL!
I am discussing those occasions when a teen-aged girl makes concerted
advances, plots and plans to lure her chosen 'victim' into a private
place, and there to seduce him in a way that most men would find great
difficulty in opposing.
It happens a lot. Were it not for the girl's promiscuous behaviour,
then there would have been no contact.
Yeah, and if it wasn't for all that *tempting* delicious looking food
so many wouldn't be fat! And if that wife would just have shut her
mouth, she wouldn't have gotten beaten by her husband! And if that
damned 7 year old kid would've just picked up his toys, he wouldn't
have gotten hit with the whip! And if that little 2 year old baby
would've just kept her diaper on - she wouldn't have been such a
temptation to that child-molester! And if those drugs weren't so
readily available and cheap on the street - well by God he wouldn't be
a drug-addict today, now would he! Oh, and take that alcohol outta
the liquor store! Too much of a temptation...we'll all be alcoholics!
Christ, Ricky - there is *temptation* in so many forms out there. And
everyone has there own "demons" and everyone is tempted by something
or other that isn't good for us...but we can't blame the temptation;
we have to blame our lack of self-control, rather.
Those circumstances call for punishing the child as much, if not more
than the man.
This is getting ridiculous. We're talking about a 14 year old here!
It's easy to say, 'rebuff her'...in practice, the girls
are very skilled, very artful and very difficult to dislodge.
Well, it's a sad day when a 14 year old can out-smart a fully grown,
adult man. And it's an even sadder day when that man then blames the
kid because she was just too "smart" and she was just too much of a
temptation!
This conversation is getting revolting.
Temptation is strong on matters such as these. That temptation had
nothing to do with the man, and everything to do with the girl.
Oh *****! "nothing to do with the man" - that is not only pompous
and arrogant of you to say...it's suggesting that a 14 year old is
somehow far more intelligent, far more mature, far more advanced, and
far more educated in the world of mind games than a grown adult is!
Now, we're talking about a 14 year old girl - someone who more than
likely, just two years prior was playing with BARBIE DOLLS and
sleeping with stuffed animals!
A child is deemed capable of 'aiding, abetting, counseling and
procuring' any offence.
Right, right...and the adult is the victim! Sure.
However, in practice, and in order to convict
the man, this law is not applied in these cases.
...thank the LORD!
It should be.
No, it absolutely should not be. Next you'll have 14 year olds able
to drive, drink, vote - hell, why not run for president! Why not?
They're unbelievably clever and all.
Pffffffffft!
Dani
Well, it's true, Dani dear, that 14 year olds aren't as "experienced" at
manipulating adults as adults are with manipulating kids or even other
adults. We're all into some manipulation to get what we think we really
want
at that opportune moment.
But, it's also true that 14 year olds, 15, 16, 17...know when an adult
wants
something really bad, and they have something to "trade" to get what they
want from the adult.
Kids want a lot of things. Like adults. Their want list is quite long,
forever changing. Like adults. They lie, steal, cheat, manipulate, act
out...just like adults do. Some are more clever than others, of course,
and
the more clever kids can get a nice lil' business 'deal' with an adult --
exchanging sex for money, drugs, material things, or sex itself -- and
they
do it all the time. Everywhere. In the neighborhoods, the schools, the
internet, you name it.
We're talking about two manipulative human beings in bad need of wanting
something -- and the consensual deal that is made to satisfy both. We're
NOT
talking about rape, molestation, or even perversion -- what is perverted
about wanting young bodies and young bodies wanting something or another
from old bodies?
It's all wanting...and it never ceases in humanity, Dani. Now, you say
that
might be true, but we have will power to oppose it. Why oppose what we
think
we want so badly when it's offered? Sure, people go off to prison. The
punishment is there. It's real, alright. But, the wanting is more powerful
often than the fear of punishment because we're talkin' about...>>SEX!!
It's
not a perversion for consenting people. It's not a violent sport. Not
warfare. Nor corporate exploitation and greed. Not environmental
pollution.
Not forced sex or rape. Not stealing. Not racism, or religious hypocrisy,
political tyranny, economic snobbery....
No, it's just two horny fucking people getting it on with each other and
satisfying their immediate carnal wantonness. And what the *****, Dani, is
so
horrible about that?
That you want some lawmakers to determine what ages we're supposed to link
up and *****? It's a dream. People don't care if they want something badly
enough, they're take the chances...as you can see, everyday, the news is
replete with these stories.
So many terrible things humans do to each other, by force, coercion,
lying,
domination...hatred and racism and religious bigotry every fucking
day...and
we're supposed to get our underwear in a twist over a 50 year old man
screwing a consenting teen-ager?
My, my...civilization must be coming down on our lil' heads for such acts
against God, against Man, against all that is *good and decent* -- as
leaders go free after tens of thousands of innocents are laid away in
early
graves over a threat that was non-existent? Those prematurely dead folks
won't have to *worry* about the immorality or amorality of sexual
liaisons,
Dani...they won't have to think how 'awful' it is to *****...they're
fucking
days were cut short by greed, fanaticism, idiocy, et al.
Yes, this conversation is getting sickening...you're right on that
account.
Sorry, Doc - but I'm right on all accounts. Child-molesters also
*want* children - rapists *want* to rape - murderers *want* to murder,
fat people *want* food - drug-addicts *want* drugs - abusers *want* to
abuse etc.. etc..
In our country we have the term *Statutory rapist* apllied to the man
or woman who WANTS to have sex with underage kids!
Don't like the law? Move.
Well, not to Boston, that's for sure.
Good! My daughters won't have to worry about you then. Oh, wait a
second - my sons won't have to worry about you either .. ;)
Yes, please don't move to Boston, Doc!
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "psychogaray" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
26 Jan 2008 09:31:59 AM |
|
|
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:lsdkp3lrcoftgv8ehdtakngjiamsbkqig3@4ax.com...
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:14:24 -0800, "psychogaray"
<psychovideo@comcast.net> wrote:
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ae1kp39rlbk672sntm8j1qmiql6k5l49vs@4ax.com...
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:17:52 -0800, "psychogaray"
<psychovideo@comcast.net> wrote:
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:66rjp3tcf4fbi4vr53b4c3s05dpdajqbmf@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:11:06 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 24 Jan, 18:01, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Wow, I'm genuinely horrified! ?I thought *everyone* knew this...that
it was a given - common knowledge. ?Guess not."
Well, there you are Dani. Horrified you have to be.
I'm horrified that you believe this way...but *very* thankful that the
law does not agree with you.
I stand by my
views, as you by yours.
Yup, and parents world-wide are also standing by me if they're reading
this I'm sure! LOL!
I am discussing those occasions when a teen-aged girl makes concerted
advances, plots and plans to lure her chosen 'victim' into a private
place, and there to seduce him in a way that most men would find great
difficulty in opposing.
It happens a lot. Were it not for the girl's promiscuous behaviour,
then there would have been no contact.
Yeah, and if it wasn't for all that *tempting* delicious looking food
so many wouldn't be fat! And if that wife would just have shut her
mouth, she wouldn't have gotten beaten by her husband! And if that
damned 7 year old kid would've just picked up his toys, he wouldn't
have gotten hit with the whip! And if that little 2 year old baby
would've just kept her diaper on - she wouldn't have been such a
temptation to that child-molester! And if those drugs weren't so
readily available and cheap on the street - well by God he wouldn't be
a drug-addict today, now would he! Oh, and take that alcohol outta
the liquor store! Too much of a temptation...we'll all be alcoholics!
Christ, Ricky - there is *temptation* in so many forms out there. And
everyone has there own "demons" and everyone is tempted by something
or other that isn't good for us...but we can't blame the temptation;
we have to blame our lack of self-control, rather.
Those circumstances call for punishing the child as much, if not more
than the man.
This is getting ridiculous. We're talking about a 14 year old here!
It's easy to say, 'rebuff her'...in practice, the girls
are very skilled, very artful and very difficult to dislodge.
Well, it's a sad day when a 14 year old can out-smart a fully grown,
adult man. And it's an even sadder day when that man then blames the
kid because she was just too "smart" and she was just too much of a
temptation!
This conversation is getting revolting.
Temptation is strong on matters such as these. That temptation had
nothing to do with the man, and everything to do with the girl.
Oh *****! "nothing to do with the man" - that is not only pompous
and arrogant of you to say...it's suggesting that a 14 year old is
somehow far more intelligent, far more mature, far more advanced, and
far more educated in the world of mind games than a grown adult is!
Now, we're talking about a 14 year old girl - someone who more than
likely, just two years prior was playing with BARBIE DOLLS and
sleeping with stuffed animals!
A child is deemed capable of 'aiding, abetting, counseling and
procuring' any offence.
Right, right...and the adult is the victim! Sure.
However, in practice, and in order to convict
the man, this law is not applied in these cases.
...thank the LORD!
It should be.
No, it absolutely should not be. Next you'll have 14 year olds able
to drive, drink, vote - hell, why not run for president! Why not?
They're unbelievably clever and all.
Pffffffffft!
Dani
Well, it's true, Dani dear, that 14 year olds aren't as "experienced" at
manipulating adults as adults are with manipulating kids or even other
adults. We're all into some manipulation to get what we think we really
want
at that opportune moment.
But, it's also true that 14 year olds, 15, 16, 17...know when an adult
wants
something really bad, and they have something to "trade" to get what
they
want from the adult.
Kids want a lot of things. Like adults. Their want list is quite long,
forever changing. Like adults. They lie, steal, cheat, manipulate, act
out...just like adults do. Some are more clever than others, of course,
and
the more clever kids can get a nice lil' business 'deal' with an
adult --
exchanging sex for money, drugs, material things, or sex itself -- and
they
do it all the time. Everywhere. In the neighborhoods, the schools, the
internet, you name it.
We're talking about two manipulative human beings in bad need of wanting
something -- and the consensual deal that is made to satisfy both. We're
NOT
talking about rape, molestation, or even perversion -- what is perverted
about wanting young bodies and young bodies wanting something or another
from old bodies?
It's all wanting...and it never ceases in humanity, Dani. Now, you say
that
might be true, but we have will power to oppose it. Why oppose what we
think
we want so badly when it's offered? Sure, people go off to prison. The
punishment is there. It's real, alright. But, the wanting is more
powerful
often than the fear of punishment because we're talkin' about...>>SEX!!
It's
not a perversion for consenting people. It's not a violent sport. Not
warfare. Nor corporate exploitation and greed. Not environmental
pollution.
Not forced sex or rape. Not stealing. Not racism, or religious
hypocrisy,
political tyranny, economic snobbery....
No, it's just two horny fucking people getting it on with each other and
satisfying their immediate carnal wantonness. And what the *****, Dani,
is
so
horrible about that?
That you want some lawmakers to determine what ages we're supposed to
link
up and *****? It's a dream. People don't care if they want something
badly
enough, they're take the chances...as you can see, everyday, the news is
replete with these stories.
So many terrible things humans do to each other, by force, coercion,
lying,
domination...hatred and racism and religious bigotry every fucking
day...and
we're supposed to get our underwear in a twist over a 50 year old man
screwing a consenting teen-ager?
My, my...civilization must be coming down on our lil' heads for such
acts
against God, against Man, against all that is *good and decent* -- as
leaders go free after tens of thousands of innocents are laid away in
early
graves over a threat that was non-existent? Those prematurely dead
folks
won't have to *worry* about the immorality or amorality of sexual
liaisons,
Dani...they won't have to think how 'awful' it is to *****...they're
fucking
days were cut short by greed, fanaticism, idiocy, et al.
Yes, this conversation is getting sickening...you're right on that
account.
Sorry, Doc - but I'm right on all accounts. Child-molesters also
*want* children - rapists *want* to rape - murderers *want* to murder,
fat people *want* food - drug-addicts *want* drugs - abusers *want* to
abuse etc.. etc..
In our country we have the term *Statutory rapist* apllied to the man
or woman who WANTS to have sex with underage kids!
Don't like the law? Move.
Well, not to Boston, that's for sure.
Good! My daughters won't have to worry about you then. Oh, wait a
second - my sons won't have to worry about you either .. ;)
Yes, please don't move to Boston, Doc!
Dani
The only real worry your sons and daughters have is to be as prejudiced
against a sexual minority as you apparently are.
More damage is done to the human mind from the myriad of malicious bigotries
than the consensual sex shared by two carnally-obsessed human beings.
The sex is over rather quickly. But the prejudice goes on and takes many
hurtful forms for a very long time.
No, I would not move to Boston, or to Brazil, or to Bosnia, because I need
not go elsewhere to meet bigots.
garay
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
26 Jan 2008 11:38:25 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 07:31:59 -0800, "psychogaray"
<psychovideo@comcast.net> wrote:
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:lsdkp3lrcoftgv8ehdtakngjiamsbkqig3@4ax.com...
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:14:24 -0800, "psychogaray"
<psychovideo@comcast.net> wrote:
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ae1kp39rlbk672sntm8j1qmiql6k5l49vs@4ax.com...
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:17:52 -0800, "psychogaray"
<psychovideo@comcast.net> wrote:
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:66rjp3tcf4fbi4vr53b4c3s05dpdajqbmf@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:11:06 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 24 Jan, 18:01, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Wow, I'm genuinely horrified! ?I thought *everyone* knew this...that
it was a given - common knowledge. ?Guess not."
Well, there you are Dani. Horrified you have to be.
I'm horrified that you believe this way...but *very* thankful that the
law does not agree with you.
I stand by my
views, as you by yours.
Yup, and parents world-wide are also standing by me if they're reading
this I'm sure! LOL!
I am discussing those occasions when a teen-aged girl makes concerted
advances, plots and plans to lure her chosen 'victim' into a private
place, and there to seduce him in a way that most men would find great
difficulty in opposing.
It happens a lot. Were it not for the girl's promiscuous behaviour,
then there would have been no contact.
Yeah, and if it wasn't for all that *tempting* delicious looking food
so many wouldn't be fat! And if that wife would just have shut her
mouth, she wouldn't have gotten beaten by her husband! And if that
damned 7 year old kid would've just picked up his toys, he wouldn't
have gotten hit with the whip! And if that little 2 year old baby
would've just kept her diaper on - she wouldn't have been such a
temptation to that child-molester! And if those drugs weren't so
readily available and cheap on the street - well by God he wouldn't be
a drug-addict today, now would he! Oh, and take that alcohol outta
the liquor store! Too much of a temptation...we'll all be alcoholics!
Christ, Ricky - there is *temptation* in so many forms out there. And
everyone has there own "demons" and everyone is tempted by something
or other that isn't good for us...but we can't blame the temptation;
we have to blame our lack of self-control, rather.
Those circumstances call for punishing the child as much, if not more
than the man.
This is getting ridiculous. We're talking about a 14 year old here!
It's easy to say, 'rebuff her'...in practice, the girls
are very skilled, very artful and very difficult to dislodge.
Well, it's a sad day when a 14 year old can out-smart a fully grown,
adult man. And it's an even sadder day when that man then blames the
kid because she was just too "smart" and she was just too much of a
temptation!
This conversation is getting revolting.
Temptation is strong on matters such as these. That temptation had
nothing to do with the man, and everything to do with the girl.
Oh *****! "nothing to do with the man" - that is not only pompous
and arrogant of you to say...it's suggesting that a 14 year old is
somehow far more intelligent, far more mature, far more advanced, and
far more educated in the world of mind games than a grown adult is!
Now, we're talking about a 14 year old girl - someone who more than
likely, just two years prior was playing with BARBIE DOLLS and
sleeping with stuffed animals!
A child is deemed capable of 'aiding, abetting, counseling and
procuring' any offence.
Right, right...and the adult is the victim! Sure.
However, in practice, and in order to convict
the man, this law is not applied in these cases.
...thank the LORD!
It should be.
No, it absolutely should not be. Next you'll have 14 year olds able
to drive, drink, vote - hell, why not run for president! Why not?
They're unbelievably clever and all.
Pffffffffft!
Dani
Well, it's true, Dani dear, that 14 year olds aren't as "experienced" at
manipulating adults as adults are with manipulating kids or even other
adults. We're all into some manipulation to get what we think we really
want
at that opportune moment.
But, it's also true that 14 year olds, 15, 16, 17...know when an adult
wants
something really bad, and they have something to "trade" to get what
they
want from the adult.
Kids want a lot of things. Like adults. Their want list is quite long,
forever changing. Like adults. They lie, steal, cheat, manipulate, act
out...just like adults do. Some are more clever than others, of course,
and
the more clever kids can get a nice lil' business 'deal' with an
adult --
exchanging sex for money, drugs, material things, or sex itself -- and
they
do it all the time. Everywhere. In the neighborhoods, the schools, the
internet, you name it.
We're talking about two manipulative human beings in bad need of wanting
something -- and the consensual deal that is made to satisfy both. We're
NOT
talking about rape, molestation, or even perversion -- what is perverted
about wanting young bodies and young bodies wanting something or another
from old bodies?
It's all wanting...and it never ceases in humanity, Dani. Now, you say
that
might be true, but we have will power to oppose it. Why oppose what we
think
we want so badly when it's offered? Sure, people go off to prison. The
punishment is there. It's real, alright. But, the wanting is more
powerful
often than the fear of punishment because we're talkin' about...>>SEX!!
It's
not a perversion for consenting people. It's not a violent sport. Not
warfare. Nor corporate exploitation and greed. Not environmental
pollution.
Not forced sex or rape. Not stealing. Not racism, or religious
hypocrisy,
political tyranny, economic snobbery....
No, it's just two horny fucking people getting it on with each other and
satisfying their immediate carnal wantonness. And what the *****, Dani,
is
so
horrible about that?
That you want some lawmakers to determine what ages we're supposed to
link
up and *****? It's a dream. People don't care if they want something
badly
enough, they're take the chances...as you can see, everyday, the news is
replete with these stories.
So many terrible things humans do to each other, by force, coercion,
lying,
domination...hatred and racism and religious bigotry every fucking
day...and
we're supposed to get our underwear in a twist over a 50 year old man
screwing a consenting teen-ager?
My, my...civilization must be coming down on our lil' heads for such
acts
against God, against Man, against all that is *good and decent* -- as
leaders go free after tens of thousands of innocents are laid away in
early
graves over a threat that was non-existent? Those prematurely dead
folks
won't have to *worry* about the immorality or amorality of sexual
liaisons,
Dani...they won't have to think how 'awful' it is to *****...they're
fucking
days were cut short by greed, fanaticism, idiocy, et al.
Yes, this conversation is getting sickening...you're right on that
account.
Sorry, Doc - but I'm right on all accounts. Child-molesters also
*want* children - rapists *want* to rape - murderers *want* to murder,
fat people *want* food - drug-addicts *want* drugs - abusers *want* to
abuse etc.. etc..
In our country we have the term *Statutory rapist* apllied to the man
or woman who WANTS to have sex with underage kids!
Don't like the law? Move.
Well, not to Boston, that's for sure.
Good! My daughters won't have to worry about you then. Oh, wait a
second - my sons won't have to worry about you either .. ;)
Yes, please don't move to Boston, Doc!
Dani
The only real worry your sons and daughters have is to be as prejudiced
against a sexual minority as you apparently are.
More damage is done to the human mind from the myriad of malicious bigotries
than the consensual sex shared by two carnally-obsessed human beings.
The sex is over rather quickly. But the prejudice goes on and takes many
hurtful forms for a very long time.
No, I would not move to Boston, or to Brazil, or to Bosnia, because I need
not go elsewhere to meet bigots.
What? Now I'm a bigot? I couldn't care less what two *consenting
adults* do in their bedroom together...that is not my concern or my
problem. But it is my problem (society's problem) when grown adults
not only think it's a-okay to have sex with 14 year olds, they then
add insult to injury by suggesting that it's *more* the child's fault
that the sex ever happened in the first place because she/he was just
"too smart" and "too tempting" and the adult fell prey. THAT is what
is intolerable here.
Oh, and if you're referring to what I wrote about my daughters and
sons not having to worry about you as a jibe at your bisexuality, and
now you think I'm a bigot because of that...well, I'll have to say
that you're a bigot, too - you don't like Bostonians! LOL! And you
especially don't like South Boston! Yup, you mustn't like the Red
Sox, either! Or the Celtics! And for that matter...I'm inclined to
think you don't like Irish people at all! LOL!
See how ridiculous that sounds? When you said: "Well, not to Boston,
that's for sure." ..when I suggested you move if you don't like the
law, I could as easily take that as you being a bigot against Boston.
When the actual FACT of the matter is you were just trying to
*personally* get at me; not all Bostonians. Just like when I made
that comment to you about you going after girls *and* boys, I was
trying to get only at YOU and not ALL bisexuals.
Spin it all you like. But you and I both know what's going on here.
You're now trying to wriggle outta what you said about adults and 14
year olds merely "fucking" and it not being a problem.
You're trying to get outta that now and pass it off as just being
"humorous" - brilliant! Maybe you're just following Ricky because
he's your new best-mate...maybe deep down you really don't feel this
way. But I'll tell ya right now - Ricky is NOT kidding.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "psychogaray" |
|
| Title: Re: Uncle Wally, have you heard about this kid? |
26 Jan 2008 11:50:31 PM |
|
|
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1qqmp3d275qkf7oocf40061bnm98g1bmpj@4ax.com...
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 07:31:59 -0800, "psychogaray"
<psychovideo@comcast.net> wrote:
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:lsdkp3lrcoftgv8ehdtakngjiamsbkqig3@4ax.com...
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:14:24 -0800, "psychogaray"
<psychovideo@comcast.net> wrote:
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ae1kp39rlbk672sntm8j1qmiql6k5l49vs@4ax.com...
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:17:52 -0800, "psychogaray"
<psychovideo@comcast.net> wrote:
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:66rjp3tcf4fbi4vr53b4c3s05dpdajqbmf@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:11:06 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 24 Jan, 18:01, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Wow, I'm genuinely horrified! ?I thought *everyone* knew
this...that
it was a given - common knowledge. ?Guess not."
Well, there you are Dani. Horrified you have to be.
I'm horrified that you believe this way...but *very* thankful that
the
law does not agree with you.
I stand by my
views, as you by yours.
Yup, and parents world-wide are also standing by me if they're
reading
this I'm sure! LOL!
I am discussing those occasions when a teen-aged girl makes
concerted
advances, plots and plans to lure her chosen 'victim' into a private
place, and there to seduce him in a way that most men would find
great
difficulty in opposing.
It happens a lot. Were it not for the girl's promiscuous behaviour,
then there would have been no contact.
Yeah, and if it wasn't for all that *tempting* delicious looking
food
so many wouldn't be fat! And if that wife would just have shut her
mouth, she wouldn't have gotten beaten by her husband! And if that
damned 7 year old kid would've just picked up his toys, he wouldn't
have gotten hit with the whip! And if that little 2 year old baby
would've just kept her diaper on - she wouldn't have been such a
temptation to that child-molester! And if those drugs weren't so
readily available and cheap on the street - well by God he wouldn't
be
a drug-addict today, now would he! Oh, and take that alcohol outta
the liquor store! Too much of a temptation...we'll all be
alcoholics!
Christ, Ricky - there is *temptation* in so many forms out there.
And
everyone has there own "demons" and everyone is tempted by something
or other that isn't good for us...but we can't blame the temptation;
we have to blame our lack of self-control, rather.
Those circumstances call for punishing the child as much, if not
more
than the man.
This is getting ridiculous. We're talking about a 14 year old here!
It's easy to say, 'rebuff her'...in practice, the girls
are very skilled, very artful and very difficult to dislodge.
Well, it's a sad | | | | | | | | | |
