| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"=?utf-8?B?V2FsbHkgTG9ybmXihKI=?=" |
| Date: |
15 Jun 2007 11:41:09 PM |
| Object: |
UNCLE WALLY 'S WORLD WAR III NEWZ WIREZ....On the road to war with Iran....16/6/7 |
DISCLAIMER: YOUR UNCLE WALLY DOES *NOT* ENDORSE THE CONTENTS OF THE
FOLLOWING ARTICLE, SO BUGGER OFF !!!.....HOOROO !!!
==============================================
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/columnists/guests/s_512887.html
On the road to war with Iran
by Pat Buchanan
Saturday, June 16, 2007
WASHINGTON
These are the "birth pangs" of a "new Middle East," said Condi Rice
last summer as Israel pounded Lebanon. Unfortunately, the new Middle
East may make us all pray for the return of the old.
Hamas is today engaged in savage street fighting with Fatah for
control of Gaza. If Hamas prevails, it could convert this Palestinian
enclave into a terrorist base camp between Israel and Egypt.
In northern Lebanon, Islamic jihadists are battling the army for
control of a Palestinian refugee camp. Scores are dead.
With Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan convulsed by ever-
widening civil wars, a new danger is that the United States, tied down
in two of those wars, may be about to lash out and launch a third --
on Iran.
"I think we've got to be prepared to take aggressive military action
against the Iranians to stop them from killing Americans in Iraq,"
Sen. Joe Lieberman blurted on "Face the Nation," adding, "To me, that
would include a strike over the border into Iran, where we have good
evidence that they have a base at which they are training those people
coming back into Iraq to kill our soldiers."
Joe's call for air strikes follows the GOP debate where several
presidential hopefuls did not even rule out the use of tactical atomic
weapons to deal with Iran's uranium enrichment program.
These are politicians, however, and bashing Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's Iran
has no political downside. More ominous are the grim words of serious
U.S. diplomats and soldiers not usually given to bellicose rhetoric.
On Wednesday, Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns told CNN that
Iran is not only arming the Taliban in Afghanistan, but Hamas in Gaza,
Hezbollah in Lebanon and insurgents in Iraq.
On Wednesday, Gen. David Petraeus told USA Today's Cesar Soriano that
Iran is "funding, arming, training and, even in some cases, directing
the activities of extremists and militia elements in Iraq."
The flow of arms from Iran into Iraq, said Petraeus, has not
diminished since the May 28 meeting between U.S. Ambassador Ryan
Crocker and his Iranian counterpart.
What Iran is being publicly charged with here, by responsible U.S.
officials, are acts of war -- arming insurgents and terrorists to kill
U.S. soldiers and civilians. Petraeus and Burns would not be making
these charges publicly if the White House did not want them made
publicly.
What is going on? The most logical explanation is that the White House
is providing advance justification for air strikes on camps of the
Iranian Revolutionary Guard that allegedly are providing training for
and transferring weapons to Afghan and Iraqi insurgents. And if the
United States conducts those strikes, Iranians will unite around
Ahmadinejad, and Tehran will order retaliatory strikes against U.S.
targets in Iraq and perhaps across the Middle East.
President Bush will then have his casus belli to take out Natanz and
all the other Iranian nuclear facilities, as the Israelis and the
neocons have been demanding that he do. This would mean a third Middle
Eastern war for America, with a nation three times as large and
populous as Iraq. Perhaps it is time to begin constructing a new wing
on Walter Reed.
Which raises the question: Where is the Congress? Why is it not
holding public hearings and sifting the evidence to determine if
Tehran is behind these attacks on Americans and if the United States
has not itself been aiding insurgents inside Iran?
Or is it all up to George W. as to whether we launch a third and wider
war in the Middle East, which could result in an economic and
strategic disaster for the United States?
Pat Buchanan edits The American Conservative magazine.
=============================
.
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: UNCLE WALLY 'S WORLD WAR III NEWZ WIREZ....On the road to war with Iran....16/6/7 |
16 Jun 2007 12:25:50 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, =?utf-8?B?V2FsbHkgTG9ybmXihKI=?=
<sgdecember2012@yahoo.ca> Spat the Words
DISCLAIMER: YOUR UNCLE WALLY DOES *NOT* ENDORSE THE CONTENTS OF THE
FOLLOWING ARTICLE, SO BUGGER OFF !!!.....HOOROO !!!
==============================================
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/columnists/guests
/s_512887.html
On the road to war with Iran
by Pat Buchanan
Saturday, June 16, 2007
WASHINGTON
These are the "birth pangs" of a "new Middle East," said Condi Rice
last summer as Israel pounded Lebanon. Unfortunately, the new Middle
East may make us all pray for the return of the old.
Hamas is today engaged in savage street fighting with Fatah for
control of Gaza. If Hamas prevails, it could convert this Palestinian
enclave into a terrorist base camp between Israel and Egypt.
In northern Lebanon, Islamic jihadists are battling the army for
control of a Palestinian refugee camp. Scores are dead.
With Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan convulsed by ever-
widening civil wars, a new danger is that the United States, tied down
in two of those wars, may be about to lash out and launch a third --
on Iran.
"I think we've got to be prepared to take aggressive military action
against the Iranians to stop them from killing Americans in Iraq,"
Sen. Joe Lieberman blurted on "Face the Nation," adding, "To me, that
would include a strike over the border into Iran, where we have good
evidence that they have a base at which they are training those people
coming back into Iraq to kill our soldiers."
Joe's call for air strikes follows the GOP debate where several
presidential hopefuls did not even rule out the use of tactical atomic
weapons to deal with Iran's uranium enrichment program.
These are politicians, however, and bashing Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's Iran
has no political downside. More ominous are the grim words of serious
U.S. diplomats and soldiers not usually given to bellicose rhetoric.
On Wednesday, Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns told CNN that
Iran is not only arming the Taliban in Afghanistan, but Hamas in Gaza,
Hezbollah in Lebanon and insurgents in Iraq.
On Wednesday, Gen. David Petraeus told USA Today's Cesar Soriano that
Iran is "funding, arming, training and, even in some cases, directing
the activities of extremists and militia elements in Iraq."
Sounds like justification for a military strike against Iran.
I wonder what a month of air bombardment would do to Iran's economy.
We could send up 10,000 unmanned drones and make Iran waste all
it's SAM's , then send in the bombers.
Iran's only recent military engagements have been against which
army, Iraq ?
This Iranian president ahmajinedad is just out of his league.
Iran's most important assets are all stationary.. a fatal problem
for the mullahs who would be regional dictators.
The flow of arms from Iran into Iraq, said Petraeus, has not
diminished since the May 28 meeting between U.S. Ambassador Ryan
Crocker and his Iranian counterpart.
What Iran is being publicly charged with here, by responsible U.S.
officials, are acts of war -- arming insurgents and terrorists to kill
U.S. soldiers and civilians. Petraeus and Burns would not be making
these charges publicly if the White House did not want them made
publicly.
What is going on? The most logical explanation is that the White House
is providing advance justification for air strikes on camps of the
Iranian Revolutionary Guard that allegedly are providing training for
and transferring weapons to Afghan and Iraqi insurgents. And if the
United States conducts those strikes, Iranians will unite around
Ahmadinejad, and Tehran will order retaliatory strikes against U.S.
targets in Iraq and perhaps across the Middle East.
President Bush will then have his casus belli to take out Natanz and
all the other Iranian nuclear facilities, as the Israelis and the
neocons have been demanding that he do. This would mean a third Middle
Eastern war for America, with a nation three times as large and
populous as Iraq. Perhaps it is time to begin constructing a new wing
on Walter Reed.
Which raises the question: Where is the Congress? Why is it not
holding public hearings and sifting the evidence to determine if
Tehran is behind these attacks on Americans and if the United States
has not itself been aiding insurgents inside Iran?
Or is it all up to George W. as to whether we launch a third and wider
war in the Middle East, which could result in an economic and
strategic disaster for the United States?
Pat Buchanan edits The American Conservative magazine.
=============================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: UNCLE WALLY 'S WORLD WAR III NEWZ WIREZ....On the road to war with Iran....16/6/7 |
16 Jun 2007 11:12:18 AM |
|
|
On Jun 15, 10:25 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, =?utf-8?B?V2FsbHkgTG9ybmXihKI=?=
<sgdecember2...@yahoo.ca> Spat the Words
DISCLAIMER: YOUR UNCLE WALLY DOES *NOT* ENDORSE THE CONTENTS OF THE
FOLLOWING ARTICLE, SO BUGGER OFF !!!.....HOOROO !!!
==============================================
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/columnists/gue...
On the road to war with Iran
by Pat Buchanan
Saturday, June 16, 2007
WASHINGTON
These are the "birth pangs" of a "new Middle East," said Condi Rice
last summer as Israel pounded Lebanon. Unfortunately, the new Middle
East may make us all pray for the return of the old.
Hamas is today engaged in savage street fighting with Fatah for
control of Gaza. If Hamas prevails, it could convert this Palestinian
enclave into a terrorist base camp between Israel and Egypt.
In northern Lebanon, Islamic jihadists are battling the army for
control of a Palestinian refugee camp. Scores are dead.
With Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan convulsed by ever-
widening civil wars, a new danger is that the United States, tied down
in two of those wars, may be about to lash out and launch a third --
on Iran.
"I think we've got to be prepared to take aggressive military action
against the Iranians to stop them from killing Americans in Iraq,"
Sen. Joe Lieberman blurted on "Face the Nation," adding, "To me, that
would include a strike over the border into Iran, where we have good
evidence that they have a base at which they are training those people
coming back into Iraq to kill our soldiers."
Joe's call for air strikes follows the GOP debate where several
presidential hopefuls did not even rule out the use of tactical atomic
weapons to deal with Iran's uranium enrichment program.
These are politicians, however, and bashing Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's Iran
has no political downside. More ominous are the grim words of serious
U.S. diplomats and soldiers not usually given to bellicose rhetoric.
On Wednesday, Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns told CNN that
Iran is not only arming the Taliban in Afghanistan, but Hamas in Gaza,
Hezbollah in Lebanon and insurgents in Iraq.
On Wednesday, Gen. David Petraeus told USA Today's Cesar Soriano that
Iran is "funding, arming, training and, even in some cases, directing
the activities of extremists and militia elements in Iraq."
Sounds like justification for a military strike against Iran.
I wonder what a month of air bombardment would do to Iran's economy.
Better be careful, Randy. You're starting to sound like Joe Lieberman
from last weekend's Face the Nation.
We could send up 10,000 unmanned drones and make Iran waste all
it's SAM's , then send in the bombers.
Keep this up and you'll soon be referred to as "neocon" by some of
your current fellow leftists.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?q?__=2E=B7:*=A8=A8*:=B7=2E=B7:*=A8=A8*:=B7=2E___UNCLE_WALLY,_YOUR_FRIENDLY_NEIGHBORHOOD_DOOMSDAY_PROPHET_&_MOST_EXCELLENT_PARTY_DUDE_EXTRAORDINAIRE=99_=2E=B7:*=A8=A8*:=B7=2E__?=" |
|
| Title: Re: UNCLE WALLY 'S WORLD WAR III NEWZ WIREZ....On the road to war with Iran....16/6/7 |
16 Jun 2007 11:34:23 PM |
|
|
On Jun 16, 3:25 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, =?utf-8?B?V2FsbHkgTG9ybmXihKI=?=
<sgdecember2...@yahoo.ca> Spat the Words
DISCLAIMER: YOUR UNCLE WALLY DOES *NOT* ENDORSE THE CONTENTS OF THE
FOLLOWING ARTICLE, SO BUGGER OFF !!!.....HOOROO !!!
==============================================
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/columnists/gue...
On the road to war with Iran
by Pat Buchanan
Saturday, June 16, 2007
WASHINGTON
These are the "birth pangs" of a "new Middle East," said Condi Rice
last summer as Israel pounded Lebanon. Unfortunately, the new Middle
East may make us all pray for the return of the old.
Hamas is today engaged in savage street fighting with Fatah for
control of Gaza. If Hamas prevails, it could convert this Palestinian
enclave into a terrorist base camp between Israel and Egypt.
In northern Lebanon, Islamic jihadists are battling the army for
control of a Palestinian refugee camp. Scores are dead.
With Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan convulsed by ever-
widening civil wars, a new danger is that the United States, tied down
in two of those wars, may be about to lash out and launch a third --
on Iran.
"I think we've got to be prepared to take aggressive military action
against the Iranians to stop them from killing Americans in Iraq,"
Sen. Joe Lieberman blurted on "Face the Nation," adding, "To me, that
would include a strike over the border into Iran, where we have good
evidence that they have a base at which they are training those people
coming back into Iraq to kill our soldiers."
Joe's call for air strikes follows the GOP debate where several
presidential hopefuls did not even rule out the use of tactical atomic
weapons to deal with Iran's uranium enrichment program.
These are politicians, however, and bashing Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's Iran
has no political downside. More ominous are the grim words of serious
U.S. diplomats and soldiers not usually given to bellicose rhetoric.
On Wednesday, Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns told CNN that
Iran is not only arming the Taliban in Afghanistan, but Hamas in Gaza,
Hezbollah in Lebanon and insurgents in Iraq.
On Wednesday, Gen. David Petraeus told USA Today's Cesar Soriano that
Iran is "funding, arming, training and, even in some cases, directing
the activities of extremists and militia elements in Iraq."
Sounds like justification for a military strike against Iran.
I wonder what a month of air bombardment would do to Iran's economy.
We could send up 10,000 unmanned drones and make Iran waste all
it's SAM's , then send in the bombers.
Iran's only recent military engagements have been against which
army, Iraq ?
This Iranian president ahmajinedad is just out of his league.
Iran's most important assets are all stationary.. a fatal problem
for the mullahs who would be regional dictators.
The flow of arms from Iran into Iraq, said Petraeus, has not
diminished since the May 28 meeting between U.S. Ambassador Ryan
Crocker and his Iranian counterpart.
What Iran is being publicly charged with here, by responsible U.S.
officials, are acts of war -- arming insurgents and terrorists to kill
U.S. soldiers and civilians. Petraeus and Burns would not be making
these charges publicly if the White House did not want them made
publicly.
What is going on? The most logical explanation is that the White House
is providing advance justification for air strikes on camps of the
Iranian Revolutionary Guard that allegedly are providing training for
and transferring weapons to Afghan and Iraqi insurgents. And if the
United States conducts those strikes, Iranians will unite around
Ahmadinejad, and Tehran will order retaliatory strikes against U.S.
targets in Iraq and perhaps across the Middle East.
President Bush will then have his casus belli to take out Natanz and
all the other Iranian nuclear facilities, as the Israelis and the
neocons have been demanding that he do. This would mean a third Middle
Eastern war for America, with a nation three times as large and
populous as Iraq. Perhaps it is time to begin constructing a new wing
on Walter Reed.
Which raises the question: Where is the Congress? Why is it not
holding public hearings and sifting the evidence to determine if
Tehran is behind these attacks on Americans and if the United States
has not itself been aiding insurgents inside Iran?
Or is it all up to George W. as to whether we launch a third and wider
war in the Middle East, which could result in an economic and
strategic disaster for the United States?
Pat Buchanan edits The American Conservative magazine.
=============================- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
We don't want to see the world-wide ramifications of this, Randy.
Will make World War I, the Great Depression & World War II combined
look like piffy little party crackers at a frickin' Sunday School
Picnic.
We're talking nuclear warfare here, not to be sneezed at.
Even if this coming war is limited only to the Middle East region,
there'll
still be major ecological damage from atomic radiation to the earth's
natural
ecosystems, no to mention irreparable damage to the DNA of biological
life on the planet.
HOOROO
UNCLE WALLY
---
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Uncle Wally 's World War III NEWZ compendium 21/9/7 13:40 A.E.S.T. -- Iran Warns of October Final Response' to Supporters of Israel
Fat Lady (Number uno) , Mr Hakey (Number 2 - what else could he be ?!?!? ;-) The Fan (Numero 3) -- UNCLE WALLY 'S WORLD WAR III NEWZ FILEZ (29/10/7) --Iran steps up preparations for US war -- hooroo !
UNCLE WALLY 'S WORLD WAR III NEWZ FILEZ..4/10/6..Krauthammer: Attack on Iran Inevitable
UNCLE WALLY 'S WORLD WAR III NEWZ FILEZ ... Iran to fire '11,000 rockets in minute' if attacked -- SUNDAY, OCTOBER 21, 2007
Uncle Wally 's World War III NEWZ COMPENDIUM .....Fri, Sept. 28, 2007 -- Saudis worried Iran nuclear issue headed to 'confrontation'
UNCLE WALLY 'S WORLD WAR III 2008 NEWZ COMPENDIUM ... US and Israel'face up to' Iran bomb 11/19/7
UNCLE WALLY 'S WORLD WAR III NEWZ CENTER (20/9/7) 13:23 A.E.S.T. Iran: Retaliation for any Israeli attack
UNCLE WALLY 'S WORLD WAR III NEWZ FILEZ ... We can attack Iran, says US commander -- SUNDAY, OCTOBER 21, 2007
| UNCLE WALLY 'S WORLD WAR III COMPENDIUM: Israeli Jets Run Iran Attack Drill (10/9/7 13:17 AEST)
Uncle Wally 's World War III ALMANAC......25/11/6.....Russian rocket deliveries to Iran started
UNCLE WALLY 'S WORLD WAR III NEWZ...12/6/7** Iran will trigger all-out regional war if attacked,
Uncle Wally 's World War III ALMANAC......25/11/6.....Russia sends air defense system to Iran
Uncle Wally 's World War III COMPENDIUM.... Monday, October 8, 2007 ... Gordon Brown 'will back air strikes on Iran'
=?utf-8?q?UNCLE_WALLY_'S_WORLD_WAR_iii_NEWZ_FILEZ=2E=2E=2E=2EIAEA_head:_Iran_attack_=E2=80=98act_of_madness=E2=80=98_=2E=2E=2E16/6/7?=
World War III **NEWS ** Friday, August 15, 2003....US fears Israel may strike Iran's nukes
|
|
|
