U.S. Underestimated War Costs by $12.3 Billion - GAO



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > U.S. Underestimated War Costs by $12.3 Billion - GAO

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android"
Date: 21 Jul 2004 07:03:33 PM
Object: U.S. Underestimated War Costs by $12.3 Billion - GAO
Hmmmmm .... $12.3 Billion .... is that still considered a lot of money??
------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Underestimated War Costs by $12.3 Billion - GAO
Wed Jul 21, 2004 07:21 PM ET

By Anna Willard
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon said on Wednesday it may tap emergency
funding for Iraq and Afghanistan earlier than requested as a congressional
report found that the Bush administration underestimated war costs by $12.3
billion.
The report fueled criticism that the wars were badly planned and comes as
Congress prepares to approve this week $25 billion in war funds that the
White House requested for the 2005 fiscal year beginning Oct. 1. Those
funds will become available when the legislation is passed.
But a Pentagon spokeswoman said the Defense Department may need to use that
money earlier if Congress does not approve a request to divert unused money
from other Pentagon accounts.
"If we do not get the ... reprograming, we will have to tap into the $25
billion earlier than fiscal year 2005," the spokeswoman said.
The report by Congress' investigative arm found that the Defense Department
has been forced to shift funds from other uses, including pushing expenses
from the 2004 fiscal year into 2005, in a move likely to boost war costs
further down the line.
"Analysis ... suggests that anticipated costs will exceed the supplemental
funding provided for the war by $12.3 billion for the current fiscal year,"
the report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) said.
Congress approved an $87 billion emergency spending bill in October 2003 to
finance military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan through the end of
September.
Democrats estimate that the Pentagon has $5 billion left to fund the 2004
shortfall but will need to find $7 billion to cover it in the last two
months of the fiscal year.
WARTIME PRESIDENT
"George W. Bush likes to call himself the wartime president, yet ... he has
grossly mismanaged the war on terrorism and the war in Iraq," said a
spokesman for Democratic presidential hopeful John Kerry.
"This latest report ... is another example of how George W. Bush planned
for the best case scenarios and failed to prepare for the realities of
war."
A Pentagon spokeswoman said it is hard to predict the exact cost of a war.
"No one knows how long it's going to last and what nations will support it
or end support."
The report warned that deferring activities planned for the 2004 fiscal
year "adds to the requirements that will need to be funded in fiscal year
2005 and potentially later years and could result in a 'bow wave' effect in
future fiscal years."
Democrats say the White House is trying to avoid using the $25 billion in
the 2004 fiscal year to keep down the size of the record budget deficit
ahead of the November election.
The White House is expected to seek a larger emergency spending bill after
the U.S. election for Iraq and Afghanistan -- which Democrats say will top
$50 billion.
The GAO also criticized the Pentagon for lack of transparency into how the
money has been spent. The report said "large amounts" were reported as
miscellaneous, providing little insight into where the money went.
Lawmakers have agreed to tighten controls and want monthly reports on the
how the latest $25 billion will be used.
But, the GAO said, "additional actions are necessary."
In a separate report, the GAO criticized the Army and Halliburton for their
logistics work in Iraq, citing the Army's poor planning and problems with
the Texas contractor's cost controls.
.

User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: U.S. Underestimated War Costs by $12.3 Billion - GAO 21 Jul 2004 08:49:59 PM
In article <cdn09l0k3k@news3.newsguy.com>, Marvin The Paranoid Android <marv@HeartOfGold.com> wrote:

Hmmmmm .... $12.3 Billion .... is that still considered a lot of money??

------------------------------------------------------------------------


U.S. Underestimated War Costs by $12.3 Billion - GAO
Wed Jul 21, 2004 07:21 PM ET

By Anna Willard

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon said on Wednesday it may tap emergency
funding for Iraq and Afghanistan earlier than requested as a congressional
report found that the Bush administration underestimated war costs by $12.3
billion.

I think that's more of an under-reporting-the-expected-costs than
underestimation.
Woods
.
User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android"

Title: Re: U.S. Underestimated War Costs by $12.3 Billion - GAO 21 Jul 2004 09:17:08 PM
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 01:49:59 GMT, Woodswun overjoyed me with this news:

In article <cdn09l0k3k@news3.newsguy.com>, Marvin The Paranoid Android <marv@HeartOfGold.com> wrote:

Hmmmmm .... $12.3 Billion .... is that still considered a lot of money??

------------------------------------------------------------------------


U.S. Underestimated War Costs by $12.3 Billion - GAO
Wed Jul 21, 2004 07:21 PM ET

By Anna Willard

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon said on Wednesday it may tap emergency
funding for Iraq and Afghanistan earlier than requested as a congressional
report found that the Bush administration underestimated war costs by $12.3
billion.


I think that's more of an under-reporting-the-expected-costs than
underestimation.

Woods

The good thing is they didn't manage to hold off until after November.
There will likely be much more 'nickle-and-diming' the Gov. Piggy Bank.
It also works as a reminder of the poor planning that went into the Iraq
invasion.
.


User: "R. Foreman"

Title: Re: U.S. Underestimated War Costs by $12.3 Billion - GAO 22 Jul 2004 04:33:51 PM
Marvin The Paranoid Android <marv@HeartOfGold.com> Spat the Words

Hmmmmm .... $12.3 Billion .... is that still considered a lot of money??

It's only 0.1 % of $10Trillion.


------------------------------------------------------------------------


U.S. Underestimated War Costs by $12.3 Billion - GAO
Wed Jul 21, 2004 07:21 PM ET

By Anna Willard

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon said on Wednesday it may tap

emergency

funding for Iraq and Afghanistan earlier than requested as a

congressional

report found that the Bush administration underestimated war costs by

$12.3

billion.

The report fueled criticism that the wars were badly planned and comes as
Congress prepares to approve this week $25 billion in war funds that the
White House requested for the 2005 fiscal year beginning Oct. 1. Those
funds will become available when the legislation is passed.

But a Pentagon spokeswoman said the Defense Department may need to use

that

money earlier if Congress does not approve a request to divert unused

money

from other Pentagon accounts.

"If we do not get the ... reprograming, we will have to tap into the $25
billion earlier than fiscal year 2005," the spokeswoman said.

The report by Congress' investigative arm found that the Defense

Department

has been forced to shift funds from other uses, including pushing

expenses

from the 2004 fiscal year into 2005, in a move likely to boost war costs
further down the line.

"Analysis ... suggests that anticipated costs will exceed the

supplemental

funding provided for the war by $12.3 billion for the current fiscal

year,"

the report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) said.

Congress approved an $87 billion emergency spending bill in October 2003

to

finance military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan through the end of
September.

Democrats estimate that the Pentagon has $5 billion left to fund the 2004
shortfall but will need to find $7 billion to cover it in the last two
months of the fiscal year.

WARTIME PRESIDENT

"George W. Bush likes to call himself the wartime president, yet ... he

has

grossly mismanaged the war on terrorism and the war in Iraq," said a
spokesman for Democratic presidential hopeful John Kerry.

"This latest report ... is another example of how George W. Bush planned
for the best case scenarios and failed to prepare for the realities of
war."

A Pentagon spokeswoman said it is hard to predict the exact cost of a

war.

"No one knows how long it's going to last and what nations will support

it

or end support."

The report warned that deferring activities planned for the 2004 fiscal
year "adds to the requirements that will need to be funded in fiscal year
2005 and potentially later years and could result in a 'bow wave' effect

in

future fiscal years."

Democrats say the White House is trying to avoid using the $25 billion in
the 2004 fiscal year to keep down the size of the record budget deficit
ahead of the November election.

The White House is expected to seek a larger emergency spending bill

after

the U.S. election for Iraq and Afghanistan -- which Democrats say will

top

$50 billion.

The GAO also criticized the Pentagon for lack of transparency into how

the

money has been spent. The report said "large amounts" were reported as
miscellaneous, providing little insight into where the money went.

Lawmakers have agreed to tighten controls and want monthly reports on the
how the latest $25 billion will be used.

But, the GAO said, "additional actions are necessary."

In a separate report, the GAO criticized the Army and Halliburton for

their

logistics work in Iraq, citing the Army's poor planning and problems with
the Texas contractor's cost controls.

.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER