Before 2000 I was trying to prepare for the worst. From Y2K Bug
launching missiles to a pole shift. As 2000 came and went with no
events I started to wonder If All the predictions of 2000 ushering in
dire predictions had any relevance at all...
Since then Israel intifada with sucide bombers
9-11 attacks on America
Gulf war in Iraq resulting in ousting of Saddam
More terror attacks feared.
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Wallys World" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
08 Jul 2004 12:33:57 AM |
|
|
(Sam) wrote in message news:<d18145fd.0407071840.58249158@posting.google.com>...
Before 2000 I was trying to prepare for the worst. From Y2K Bug
launching missiles to a pole shift. As 2000 came and went with no
events I started to wonder If All the predictions of 2000 ushering in
dire predictions had any relevance at all...
Since then Israel intifada with sucide bombers
9-11 attacks on America
Gulf war in Iraq resulting in ousting of Saddam
More terror attacks feared.
===========================================================================
In Europe, possibly -- after the assassination of Yassin and the Abu
Graihb fiasco, it seems to be a fait accompli now......
I can sense something very big coming later this year -- don't know
quite
exactly what it will be -- but my prophetic vision of a large city
until total quarantine could be an ominous portent of
foreboding........
HOOROO ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
=============================================================================
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Wallys World" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
08 Jul 2004 12:34:23 AM |
|
|
(Sam) wrote in message news:<d18145fd.0407071840.58249158@posting.google.com>...
Before 2000 I was trying to prepare for the worst. From Y2K Bug
launching missiles to a pole shift. As 2000 came and went with no
events I started to wonder If All the predictions of 2000 ushering in
dire predictions had any relevance at all...
Since then Israel intifada with sucide bombers
9-11 attacks on America
Gulf war in Iraq resulting in ousting of Saddam
More terror attacks feared.
===========================================================================
In Europe, possibly -- after the assassination of Yassin and the Abu
Graihb fiasco, it seems to be a fait accompli now......
I can sense something very big coming later this year -- don't know
quite
exactly what it will be -- but my prophetic vision of a large city
until total quarantine could be an ominous portent of
foreboding........
HOOROO ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
=============================================================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "u2 fan" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
08 Jul 2004 03:57:23 AM |
|
|
"Uncle Wally's World" <unclewallysworld@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:a7ef5981.0407072134.4f4c8029@posting.google.com...
SamuelF566@AOL.COM (Sam) wrote in message
news:<d18145fd.0407071840.58249158@posting.google.com>...
Before 2000 I was trying to prepare for the worst. From Y2K Bug
launching missiles to a pole shift. As 2000 came and went with no
events I started to wonder If All the predictions of 2000 ushering in
dire predictions had any relevance at all...
Since then Israel intifada with sucide bombers
9-11 attacks on America
Gulf war in Iraq resulting in ousting of Saddam
More terror attacks feared.
===========================================================================
In Europe, possibly -- after the assassination of Yassin and the Abu
Graihb fiasco, it seems to be a fait accompli now......
I can sense something very big coming later this year -- don't know
quite
exactly what it will be -- but my prophetic vision of a large city
until total quarantine could be an ominous portent of
foreboding........
HOOROO ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
============================================================================
=
I have feared that for good old London for some time, imagining how we'd
cope in the aftermath of a nuke in the city, the possible chaos ensuing, but
realistically we have been fortunate things have stayed calm, and
prayerfully that's the way things stay.
Questions remain ? Are there suitcase nukes on the loose, aparently so, we
hear 30 or so went missing, in the 60's these things may have came in to
america with diplomats etc... where are they ? There are other wmd about and
there are terrorists. The potential for any day something to happen is a
reality. If you think about all the bad things that could happen we are
lucky so many don't.
You can say "when" but you can say it could happen anytime or maybe it will
never happen.
But life goes on :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
08 Jul 2004 05:15:25 AM |
|
|
"u2 fan" <aha@nospam.no> wrote in message
news:ccj29j$jrd$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
"Uncle Wally's World" <unclewallysworld@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:a7ef5981.0407072134.4f4c8029@posting.google.com...
SamuelF566@AOL.COM (Sam) wrote in message
news:<d18145fd.0407071840.58249158@posting.google.com>...
Before 2000 I was trying to prepare for the worst. From Y2K Bug
launching missiles to a pole shift. As 2000 came and went with no
events I started to wonder If All the predictions of 2000 ushering in
dire predictions had any relevance at all...
Since then Israel intifada with sucide bombers
9-11 attacks on America
Gulf war in Iraq resulting in ousting of Saddam
More terror attacks feared.
===========================================================================
In Europe, possibly -- after the assassination of Yassin and the Abu
Graihb fiasco, it seems to be a fait accompli now......
I can sense something very big coming later this year -- don't know
quite
exactly what it will be -- but my prophetic vision of a large city
until total quarantine could be an ominous portent of
foreboding........
HOOROO ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
============================================================================
=
I have feared that for good old London for some time, imagining how we'd
cope in the aftermath of a nuke in the city, the possible chaos ensuing,
but
realistically we have been fortunate things have stayed calm, and
prayerfully that's the way things stay.
Questions remain ? Are there suitcase nukes on the loose, aparently so, we
hear 30 or so went missing,
Only according to Lebed, who is a fruitcake with an agenda.. (and lucrative
"security consultant" contracts)
in the 60's these things may have came in to
america with diplomats etc
Unlikely that the US would have been smuggling nukes into the UK. And again,
these things aren't "suitcase sized" more "removal trunk sized".
... where are they ? There are other wmd about and
there are terrorists. The potential for any day something to happen is a
reality. If you think about all the bad things that could happen we are
lucky so many don't.
You can say "when" but you can say it could happen anytime or maybe it
will
never happen.
But life goes on :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "sonya" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
08 Jul 2004 11:00:19 AM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:<ccj6n3$3fe$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"u2 fan" <aha@nospam.no> wrote in message
news:ccj29j$jrd$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
"Uncle Wally's World" <unclewallysworld@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:a7ef5981.0407072134.4f4c8029@posting.google.com...
SamuelF566@AOL.COM (Sam) wrote in message
news:<d18145fd.0407071840.58249158@posting.google.com>...
Before 2000 I was trying to prepare for the worst. From Y2K Bug
launching missiles to a pole shift. As 2000 came and went with no
events I started to wonder If All the predictions of 2000 ushering in
dire predictions had any relevance at all...
Since then Israel intifada with sucide bombers
9-11 attacks on America
Gulf war in Iraq resulting in ousting of Saddam
More terror attacks feared.
===========================================================================
In Europe, possibly -- after the assassination of Yassin and the Abu
Graihb fiasco, it seems to be a fait accompli now......
I can sense something very big coming later this year -- don't know
quite
exactly what it will be -- but my prophetic vision of a large city
until total quarantine could be an ominous portent of
foreboding........
HOOROO ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
============================================================================
=
I have feared that for good old London for some time, imagining how we'd
cope in the aftermath of a nuke in the city, the possible chaos ensuing,
but
realistically we have been fortunate things have stayed calm, and
prayerfully that's the way things stay.
Questions remain ? Are there suitcase nukes on the loose, aparently so, we
hear 30 or so went missing,
Only according to Lebed, who is a fruitcake with an agenda.. (and lucrative
"security consultant" contracts)
in the 60's these things may have came in to
america with diplomats etc
Unlikely that the US would have been smuggling nukes into the UK. And again,
these things aren't "suitcase sized" more "removal trunk sized".
Hey man, if we can now have cell phones that are smaller than a pack
of cigarettes that also take pictures, show TV and function like PDAs,
what makes you think they can't take a 'trunk sized' nuke and engineer
it down to be the size of a toaster?
Sonya
... where are they ? There are other wmd about and
there are terrorists. The potential for any day something to happen is a
reality. If you think about all the bad things that could happen we are
lucky so many don't.
You can say "when" but you can say it could happen anytime or maybe it
will
never happen.
But life goes on :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
09 Jul 2004 02:18:09 AM |
|
|
"sonya" <tandym@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7bf6888e.0407080800.3470c3d8@posting.google.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:<ccj6n3$3fe$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"u2 fan" <aha@nospam.no> wrote in message
news:ccj29j$jrd$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
"Uncle Wally's World" <unclewallysworld@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:a7ef5981.0407072134.4f4c8029@posting.google.com...
SamuelF566@AOL.COM (Sam) wrote in message
news:<d18145fd.0407071840.58249158@posting.google.com>...
Before 2000 I was trying to prepare for the worst. From Y2K Bug
launching missiles to a pole shift. As 2000 came and went with no
events I started to wonder If All the predictions of 2000 ushering
in
dire predictions had any relevance at all...
Since then Israel intifada with sucide bombers
9-11 attacks on America
Gulf war in Iraq resulting in ousting of
Saddam
More terror attacks feared.
===========================================================================
In Europe, possibly -- after the assassination of Yassin and the Abu
Graihb fiasco, it seems to be a fait accompli now......
I can sense something very big coming later this year -- don't know
quite
exactly what it will be -- but my prophetic vision of a large city
until total quarantine could be an ominous portent of
foreboding........
HOOROO ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
============================================================================
=
I have feared that for good old London for some time, imagining how
we'd
cope in the aftermath of a nuke in the city, the possible chaos
ensuing,
but
realistically we have been fortunate things have stayed calm, and
prayerfully that's the way things stay.
Questions remain ? Are there suitcase nukes on the loose, aparently
so, we
hear 30 or so went missing,
Only according to Lebed, who is a fruitcake with an agenda.. (and
lucrative
"security consultant" contracts)
in the 60's these things may have came in to
america with diplomats etc
Unlikely that the US would have been smuggling nukes into the UK. And
again,
these things aren't "suitcase sized" more "removal trunk sized".
Hey man, if we can now have cell phones that are smaller than a pack
of cigarettes that also take pictures, show TV and function like PDAs,
what makes you think they can't take a 'trunk sized' nuke and engineer
it down to be the size of a toaster?
Physics.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sid See" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
08 Jul 2004 03:17:31 PM |
|
|
sonya <tandym@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7bf6888e.0407080800.3470c3d8@posting.google.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:<ccj6n3$3fe$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"u2 fan" <aha@nospam.no> wrote in message
news:ccj29j$jrd$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
"Uncle Wally's World" <unclewallysworld@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:a7ef5981.0407072134.4f4c8029@posting.google.com...
SamuelF566@AOL.COM (Sam) wrote in message
news:<d18145fd.0407071840.58249158@posting.google.com>...
Before 2000 I was trying to prepare for the worst. From Y2K Bug
launching missiles to a pole shift. As 2000 came and went with no
events I started to wonder If All the predictions of 2000 ushering in
dire predictions had any relevance at all...
Since then Israel intifada with sucide bombers
9-11 attacks on America
Gulf war in Iraq resulting in ousting of Saddam
More terror attacks feared.
===========================================================================
In Europe, possibly -- after the assassination of Yassin and the Abu
Graihb fiasco, it seems to be a fait accompli now......
I can sense something very big coming later this year -- don't know
quite
exactly what it will be -- but my prophetic vision of a large city
until total quarantine could be an ominous portent of
foreboding........
HOOROO ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
============================================================================
=
I have feared that for good old London for some time, imagining how we'd
cope in the aftermath of a nuke in the city, the possible chaos ensuing,
but
realistically we have been fortunate things have stayed calm, and
prayerfully that's the way things stay.
Questions remain ? Are there suitcase nukes on the loose, aparently so, we
hear 30 or so went missing,
Only according to Lebed, who is a fruitcake with an agenda.. (and lucrative
"security consultant" contracts)
in the 60's these things may have came in to
america with diplomats etc
Unlikely that the US would have been smuggling nukes into the UK. And again,
these things aren't "suitcase sized" more "removal trunk sized".
Hey man, if we can now have cell phones that are smaller than a pack
of cigarettes that also take pictures, show TV and function like PDAs,
what makes you think they can't take a 'trunk sized' nuke and engineer
it down to be the size of a toaster?
Sonya
It seems, the quantity of fissionable
material and the explosives necessary to
implode it (to start the chain reaction)
won't fit into a toaster. We can
miniaturize electronic circuits, but not
atoms or molecules.
SS
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
08 Jul 2004 04:53:05 PM |
|
|
sonya wrote:
[…]
Hey man, if we can now have cell phones that are smaller than a pack
of cigarettes that also take pictures, show TV and function like PDAs,
what makes you think they can't take a 'trunk sized' nuke and engineer
it down to be the size of a toaster?
Sonya
Using the best of everything available you'd need 2-3kg of top quality
weapons grade Plutonium shaped into a hollow sphere. Surround that
with high explosives to implode the hollow sphere into a compressed
super-critical solid sphere, a deal of lead around the outside for
safe handling and you're done. Of course, it's much more complicated
than that but you can see the fundamental limits on miniaturisation.
The chain-reaction physics won't work below 2kg of Pu, more for
reactor grade Pu. So we can say with reasonable confidence that you'll
never hear of a toaster sized nuke.
However, a gram of anti-matter magnetically suspended in a perfect
vacuum *could* be much smaller and waaaay more explosive in ~50
years.. maybe.
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sid See" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
08 Jul 2004 05:10:15 PM |
|
|
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8f290e5f.0407081353.5ec1ab5@posting.google.com...
sonya wrote:
[.]
Hey man, if we can now have cell phones that are smaller than a pack
of cigarettes that also take pictures, show TV and function like PDAs,
what makes you think they can't take a 'trunk sized' nuke and engineer
it down to be the size of a toaster?
Sonya
Using the best of everything available you'd need 2-3kg of top quality
weapons grade Plutonium shaped into a hollow sphere. Surround that
with high explosives to implode the hollow sphere into a compressed
super-critical solid sphere, a deal of lead around the outside for
safe handling and you're done. Of course, it's much more complicated
than that but you can see the fundamental limits on miniaturisation.
The chain-reaction physics won't work below 2kg of Pu, more for
reactor grade Pu. So we can say with reasonable confidence that you'll
never hear of a toaster sized nuke.
However, a gram of anti-matter magnetically suspended in a perfect
vacuum *could* be much smaller and waaaay more explosive in ~50
years.. maybe.
-A
But the anti-matter bomb wouldn't be
so miniature either, considering the
temperature and power required to
suspend matter (or anti) magnetically...
SS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
09 Jul 2004 07:20:42 PM |
|
|
Sid See wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8f290e5f.0407081353.5ec1ab5@posting.google.com...
sonya wrote:
[.]
Hey man, if we can now have cell phones that are smaller than a
pack
of cigarettes that also take pictures, show TV and function like
PDAs,
what makes you think they can't take a 'trunk sized' nuke and
engineer
it down to be the size of a toaster?
Sonya
Using the best of everything available you'd need 2-3kg of top
quality
weapons grade Plutonium shaped into a hollow sphere. Surround that
with high explosives to implode the hollow sphere into a compressed
super-critical solid sphere, a deal of lead around the outside for
safe handling and you're done. Of course, it's much more complicated
than that but you can see the fundamental limits on miniaturisation.
The chain-reaction physics won't work below 2kg of Pu, more for
reactor grade Pu. So we can say with reasonable confidence that
you'll
never hear of a toaster sized nuke.
However, a gram of anti-matter magnetically suspended in a perfect
vacuum *could* be much smaller and waaaay more explosive in ~50
years.. maybe.
-A
But the anti-matter bomb wouldn't be
so miniature either, considering the
temperature and power required to
suspend matter (or anti) magnetically...
SS
*could* - emphasis not added.
I guess you're suggesting an anti-matter plasma constrained within a
magnetic bottle.. like a tokamak fusion reactor? Well yes, that would
be LARGE. However, in my lurid imagination I pictured a solid magnetic
material, say anti-matter iron, levitated between 3 pairs of opposed
electromagnets in the x, y and z planes. Just thinking out loud.
-A (Dr evil)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sid See" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
10 Jul 2004 03:16:50 PM |
|
|
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8f290e5f.0407091620.39dbc180@posting.google.com...
Sid See wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8f290e5f.0407081353.5ec1ab5@posting.google.com...
sonya wrote:
[.]
Hey man, if we can now have cell phones that are smaller than a
pack
of cigarettes that also take pictures, show TV and function like
PDAs,
what makes you think they can't take a 'trunk sized' nuke and
engineer
it down to be the size of a toaster?
Sonya
Using the best of everything available you'd need 2-3kg of top
quality
weapons grade Plutonium shaped into a hollow sphere. Surround that
with high explosives to implode the hollow sphere into a compressed
super-critical solid sphere, a deal of lead around the outside for
safe handling and you're done. Of course, it's much more complicated
than that but you can see the fundamental limits on miniaturisation.
The chain-reaction physics won't work below 2kg of Pu, more for
reactor grade Pu. So we can say with reasonable confidence that
you'll
never hear of a toaster sized nuke.
However, a gram of anti-matter magnetically suspended in a perfect
vacuum *could* be much smaller and waaaay more explosive in ~50
years.. maybe.
-A
But the anti-matter bomb wouldn't be
so miniature either, considering the
temperature and power required to
suspend matter (or anti) magnetically...
SS
*could* - emphasis not added.
I guess you're suggesting an anti-matter plasma constrained within a
magnetic bottle.. like a tokamak fusion reactor? Well yes, that would
be LARGE. However, in my lurid imagination I pictured a solid magnetic
material, say anti-matter iron, levitated between 3 pairs of opposed
electromagnets in the x, y and z planes. Just thinking out loud.
-A (Dr evil)
I was visualizing the quantity of l-ion
batteries that would be required to
power such a robust magnetic field
(required in either scenario). I doubt
if two people could transport them...
now if we consider the weight of the
iron (anti or not) and silver alloy wire...
Sid
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "u2 fan" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
08 Jul 2004 09:58:40 AM |
|
|
Unlikely that the US would have been smuggling nukes into the UK. And
again,
these things aren't "suitcase sized" more "removal trunk sized".
Not what I mean't I mean't Russian diplomats were flying suitcase nukes into
usa in private jets.
As for size the davey crockett nuclear weapon ranging from 10T to 1KT was
very small indeed http://www.6v6gt.com/Atomic/ as was the sadm
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
09 Jul 2004 02:02:18 AM |
|
|
"u2 fan" <aha@nospam.no> wrote in message
news:ccjnf0$q45$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
Unlikely that the US would have been smuggling nukes into the UK. And
again,
these things aren't "suitcase sized" more "removal trunk sized".
Not what I mean't I mean't Russian diplomats were flying suitcase nukes
into
usa in private jets.
As for size the davey crockett nuclear weapon ranging from 10T to 1KT was
very small indeed http://www.6v6gt.com/Atomic/ as was the sadm
Still FAR too large to fit in a suitcase...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Youefo" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
08 Jul 2004 09:27:49 PM |
|
|
Since Jan 2000 Israel intifada with sucide bombers
9-11 attacks on America
Gulf war in Iraq resulting in ousting of Saddam
More terror attacks feared.
My, aren't we a tribal species! What about 60,000 Turkish deaths in a single
earthquake? Black on black racist violence in Africa that killied a quarter
million? The floods in Central America? Oh, but 3,000 Americans died and two
big buildings got knocked down! I'm ex-military, and I vote we find and kill
the bad guys. That's what one does to armed enemies. But let's be real.
Despite CNN, 9/11 was not the deadliest event (not by a long shot) thus far
in the 21st centtury.
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
08 Jul 2004 11:50:14 PM |
|
|
"Youefo" <here@now.net> Spat the Words
Since Jan 2000 Israel intifada with sucide bombers
9-11 attacks on America
Gulf war in Iraq resulting in ousting of
Saddam
More terror attacks feared.
My, aren't we a tribal species! What about 60,000 Turkish deaths in a
single earthquake? Black on black racist violence in Africa that
killied a quarter million? The floods in Central America? Oh, but
3,000 Americans died and two big buildings got knocked down! I'm
ex-military, and I vote we find and kill the bad guys. That's what one
does to armed enemies. But let's be real. Despite CNN, 9/11 was not
the deadliest event (not by a long shot) thus far in the 21st
centtury.
Good point. Enemies who attack us should get a response, but
Bush is taking us down the wrong course. We should increase
security, lock down our ports and borders, and get more
involved in Arab countries (not necessarily invading them).
Keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nova Carta" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
08 Jul 2004 04:48:25 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 08:57:23 +0000 (UTC), "u2 fan" <aha@nospam.no>
wrote:
"Uncle Wally's World" <unclewallysworld@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:a7ef5981.0407072134.4f4c8029@posting.google.com...
SamuelF566@AOL.COM (Sam) wrote in message
news:<d18145fd.0407071840.58249158@posting.google.com>...
Before 2000 I was trying to prepare for the worst. From Y2K Bug
launching missiles to a pole shift. As 2000 came and went with no
events I started to wonder If All the predictions of 2000 ushering in
dire predictions had any relevance at all...
Since then Israel intifada with sucide bombers
9-11 attacks on America
Gulf war in Iraq resulting in ousting of Saddam
More terror attacks feared.
===========================================================================
In Europe, possibly -- after the assassination of Yassin and the Abu
Graihb fiasco, it seems to be a fait accompli now......
I can sense something very big coming later this year -- don't know
quite
exactly what it will be -- but my prophetic vision of a large city
until total quarantine could be an ominous portent of
foreboding........
HOOROO ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
============================================================================
=
I have feared that for good old London for some time, imagining how we'd
cope in the aftermath of a nuke in the city, the possible chaos ensuing, but
realistically we have been fortunate things have stayed calm, and
prayerfully that's the way things stay.
Questions remain ? Are there suitcase nukes on the loose, aparently so, we
hear 30 or so went missing, in the 60's these things may have came in to
america with diplomats etc... where are they ? There are other wmd about and
there are terrorists. The potential for any day something to happen is a
reality. If you think about all the bad things that could happen we are
lucky so many don't.
You can say "when" but you can say it could happen anytime or maybe it will
never happen.
But life goes on :-)
I think I read somewhere that during the Blitz of WWII that a lot of
Londoners got so used to the buzz bombs that they went about their
daily lives even while the city was being destroyed around them. I
think that the human condition is such that we get used to just about
anything. This can be dangerous. I really hope nothing happens to
anyone but didn't someone once say "Vigilance is the price of freedom"
Nova
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanne" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
08 Jul 2004 12:46:36 AM |
|
|
Whoa! Your send button is stuck in parallel time......
-Angelique Collins
<whoooo-ew-ewwwwwwww-whoo>
<Spooky waves crashing and pounding surf sound>
.
|
|
|
| User: "TrUlY WoNdRoUs YeS SiReE YeS InDeEdY Do" |
|
| Title: Re: Vague but deadly |
08 Jul 2004 11:21:34 PM |
|
|
(Su Zanne) wrote in message news:<14312-40ECDFBC-309@storefull-3218.bay.webtv.net>...
Whoa! Your send button is stuck in parallel time......
-Angelique Collins
<whoooo-ew-ewwwwwwww-whoo>
<Spooky waves crashing and pounding surf sound>
Thank-U sweetie=pumpkin-fritters ;-)
HOOROO :-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
===================================================================
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
