| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"=?utf-8?B?4pi6IC7CtzoqwqjCqCo6wrcuwrc6KsKowqgqOsK3LiAg4pmlIFVuY2xlIFdhbGx5IFJ1bGV6ICEgRlJJQ0sgeWVhaCAhIOKZoy4uLkhPT1JPTyAh4pmm4pmg4peY4peL4peZ4pmC4pmA4pmq4pmr4pi84pa6LsK3OirCqMKoKjrCty4g4pml4pi6wqnCruKEog==?=" |
| Date: |
29 Mar 2007 10:48:52 PM |
| Object: |
***VERY SERIOUS ESCALATIONS, PEOPLEZ*** |
The Fat Lady iz getting ready to crap on the fan !
HOOROO =E2=98=BA=E2=98=BB=E2=99=A5
UNCLE WALLY =E2=99=A6=E2=99=A3=E2=99=A0
=E2=80=A2=E2=97=98=E2=97=8B=E2=97=99=E2=99=82=E2=99=80=E2=99=AA=E2=99=AB=E2=
=98=BC=E2=96=BA=E2=97=84
***VERY SERIOUS ESCALATIONS***
http://www.abbaswatchman.com/
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17440.htm
Easter Surprise: Attack on Iran, New 9/11=E2=80=A6 or Worse
By Heather Wokusch
=E2=80=9CThere=E2=80=99s an old saying in Tennessee =E2=80=94 I know it=E2=
=80=99s in Texas, probably
in Tennessee =E2=80=94 that says, fool me once, shame on =E2=80=94 shame on=
you. Fool
me =E2=80=94 you can=E2=80=99t get fooled again.=E2=80=9D =E2=80=93 George =
W=2E Bush, September 2002
=E2=80=9CThis notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran=
is
simply ridiculous=E2=80=A6 Having said that, all options are on the table.=
=E2=80=9D =E2=80=93
George W. Bush, February 2005
03/29/07 "ICH " -- -- The Bush administration continues moving closer
to a nuclear attack on Iran, and we ignore the obvious buildup at our
peril.
Russian media is sounding alarms. In February, ultra-nationalist
leader Vladimir Shirinovsky warned that the US would launch a strike
against Tehran at the end of this month. Then last week, the Russian
News and Information Agency Novosti (RIA-Novosti) quoted military
experts predicting the US will attack Iran on April 6th, Good Friday.
According to RIA-Novosti, the imminent assault will target Iranian air
and naval defense capabilities, armed forces headquarters as well as
key economic assets and administration headquarters. Massive air
strikes will be deployed, possibly tactical nuclear weapons as well,
and the Bush administration will attempt to exploit the resulting
chaos and political unrest by installing a pro-US government.
Sound familiar? It's Iraq D=C3=A9j=C3=A0 vu all over again, and we know how=
well
that war has gone.
Seymour Hersh has published numerous articles in The New Yorker
detailing the Bush administration's plans to invade Iran. His latest,
"The Redirection," discusses US participation in Iran-based
clandestine operations, the kidnapping of hundreds of Iranians
(including many "humanitarian and aid workers") by US forces and the
shocking revelation that an Iran-Contra-type scandal has been run out
of Vice President ***** Cheney's office with some of the illicit funds
going to groups "sympathetic to al-Qaeda."
"The Redirection" also reports that the Pentagon has been planning to
bomb Iran for a year and that a recently-established group connected
to the Joint Chiefs of Staff is formulating a assault strategy to be
implemented "upon orders from the President, within twenty-four
hours." Hersh notes that current capabilities "allow for an attack
order this spring," possibly when four US aircraft-carrier battle
groups are scheduled to be in the Persian Gulf simultaneously.
Meanwhile, the Democratic Congress busies itself with non-binding,
timid resolutions on Iraq and recently altered a military-funding bill
to make it easier for Bush to invade Iran. As Rep. Shelley Berkley (D-
NV) explained, language demanding that Bush seek congressional
approval before attacking Iran "would take away perhaps the most
important negotiating tool that the U.S. has when it comes to Iran."
Such sheer ignorance and blind denial would be laughable if it weren't
marching us into Armageddon.
But with this Administration (and this Congress, apparently) diplomacy
be damned.
It's now widely known that Iran had broached peace talks with the US
in 2003 - Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice admitted as much in 2006
when she said, "what the Iranians wanted earlier was to be one-on-one
with the United States." Yet the White House rejected Tehran's
overture outright and Rice has since developed selective amnesia,
later saying of the Iranian proposal, I don't remember seeing any such
thing. "
For its part, the UN Security Council recently tightened sanctions
aimed at pressuring Iran to cease uranium enrichment, and in response,
Iran announced it would cooperate less with the International Atomic
Energy Agency.
It's worth noting that Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-
Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and says that its program falls under the
legally permitted right to "peacefully use nuclear technology." In
contrast, Israel has neither signed nor ratified the NPT and the US
would breach the Treaty by conducting a nuclear attack against Iran.
Besides, the Bush administration's message to its enemies has been
very clear: if you possess WMD you're safe, and if you don't, you're
fair game. Iraq had no nuclear weapons and was invaded, Iran doesn't
as well and risks attack, yet that other "Axis of Evil" country, North
Korea, reportedly does have nuclear weapons and is left alone. When
considering that India and Pakistan (and presumably Israel) developed
secret nuclear weapons programs yet remain on good terms with
Washington, the case for war becomes even more tenuous.
What consequences would arise from a US attack on Iran? Retaliation,
for one. Tehran promised a "crushing response" to any US or Israeli
assault, and while the country - ironically - doesn't possess nuclear
weapons to scare off attackers, it does have other options. Iran
boasts a standing army estimated at 450,000 personnel, as well as long-
range missiles that could hit Israel and possibly even Europe. In
addition, much of the world's oil supply is transported through the
Strait of Hormuz, a narrow stretch of water which Iran borders to the
north. In 1997, Iran's deputy foreign minister warned that the country
might close off that shipping route if ever threatened, and it
wouldn't be difficult. Just a few missiles or gunboats could bring
down vessels and block the Strait, thereby threatening the global oil
supply and shooting the price of crude oil to over $100 a barrel, with
untold negative consequences for the world economy.
An attack on Iran would also inflame tensions in the Middle East, and
could tip the scales towards a new geopolitical balance, one in which
the US finds itself shut out by Russia, China, Iran, Muslim countries
and the many others Bush has managed to alienate during his period in
office.
The most horrific impact of a US assault on Iran, of course, would be
the potentially catastrophic number of casualties. The Oxford Research
Group predicted that up to 10,000 people would die if the US bombed
Iran's nuclear sites, and that an attack on the Bushehr nuclear
reactor could send a radioactive cloud over the Gulf. If the US uses
nuclear weapons, such as earth-penetrating "bunker buster" bombs,
radioactive fallout would become even more disastrous.
The devastating implications of a US strike on Iran are clear. And
that begs the question: how could the US public be convinced to enter
another potentially ugly and protracted war?
Former CIA Officer Philip Giraldi chillingly noted that the Pentagon's
plans to attack Iran were drawn up "to be employed in response to
another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States." Writing in
The American Conservative in August 2005, Giraldi added, "The plan
includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional
and tactical nuclear weapons. Within Iran there are more than 450
major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-
program development sites ... As in the case of Iraq, the response is
not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of
terrorism directed against the United States."
Chew on that one a minute. The Pentagon's plan would be in response to
a terrorist attack on the US, but not contingent upon Iran actually
having been responsible. How outlandish is this scenario: another 9/11
hits the US, the administration says it has secret information
implicating Iran, the US population demands retribution and bombs
start dropping on Tehran.
While even contemplating another 9/11 brings shudders, it's worth
noting that last year, Congress quietly approved provisions making it
easier for the President to declare federal martial law after a
domestic terrorist incident. And recall that in late 2003, General
Tommy Franks openly speculated on how a new 9/11 could lead to a
military form of government: "a terrorist, massive, casualty-producing
event somewhere in the Western world - it may be in the United States
of America - that causes our population to question our own
Constitution and to begin to militarize our country in order to avoid
a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing event. Which in fact,
then begins to unravel the fabric of our Constitution."
Meanwhile, Iran conducted war games in the Persian Gulf last week and
just yesterday, the US Navy began its largest maneuvers in the region
since the 2003 Iraq invasion, complete with over 100 US warplanes and
10,000 personnel.
The clock is ticking, and there's far too much at stake.
If you're from the US, contact your Senators today and ask them to
support the Webb amendment prohibiting the Administration from
attacking Iran without congressional approval. Tell them to support
the Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) bill making it
harder for Bush to declare martial law and take over the National
Guard, and while you're at it, tell your Senators to only fund troop
withdrawal and to bring the troops home. Thank those Congress members
who voted against more war funding.
We could be looking at WWIII. The time for positive action is now.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
.
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: ***VERY SERIOUS ESCALATIONS, PEOPLEZ*** |
30 Mar 2007 04:29:25 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, <stargatedecember2012@yahoo.ca>
Spat the Words
The Fat Lady iz getting ready to crap on the fan !
I almost thought you said "The Fat Lady iz getting ready to
crap on Iran !"
HOOROO ☺☻♥
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Bipolar" |
|
| Title: Re: ***VERY SERIOUS ESCALATIONS, PEOPLEZ*** |
30 Mar 2007 06:04:49 AM |
|
|
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9903195517B9Arrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation,
<stargatedecember2012@yahoo.ca>
Spat the Words
The Fat Lady iz getting ready to crap on the fan !
I almost thought you said "The Fat Lady iz getting ready to
crap on Iran !"
This is the way I see it right now -- Congress knew that both resolutions
to pull US troops out by March 31, 2008, would be vetoed and that they
didn't have the necessary majority to override either veto.
If my theory is right, and it's only a theory, of course, then the veto of
both resolutions will lay the basic groundwork to seriously consider
drawing up articles of impeachment during the spring and summer months.
The situation is already that this adminstration had 'defied' the will of
congress earlier by continuing with the 'surge' or escalation in Iraq.
And, now, they are rejecting the will of Congress (and the majority of the
American people) by refusing to accept a pull-out timetable.
I think these two things alone lay a good groundwork to move for
impeachment, and there'll undoubtedly be earlier 'issues' raised to
bolster their drive to get Bush and his Cabinet removed.
Dr. Bipolar
HOOROO ☺☻♥
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: ***VERY SERIOUS ESCALATIONS, PEOPLEZ*** |
30 Mar 2007 09:47:32 PM |
|
|
"Dr. Bipolar" <doctorsalwaysin@theglobalasylum.com> wrote in message
news:460cbc80_4@newsfeed.slurp.net...
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9903195517B9Arrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, <stargatedecember2012@yahoo.ca>
Spat the Words
The Fat Lady iz getting ready to crap on the fan !
I almost thought you said "The Fat Lady iz getting ready to
crap on Iran !"
This is the way I see it right now -- Congress knew that both resolutions
to pull US troops out by March 31, 2008, would be vetoed and that they
didn't have the necessary majority to override either veto.
If my theory is right, and it's only a theory, of course, then the veto of
both resolutions will lay the basic groundwork to seriously consider
drawing up articles of impeachment during the spring and summer months.
The situation is already that this adminstration had 'defied' the will of
congress earlier by continuing with the 'surge' or escalation in Iraq.
And, now, they are rejecting the will of Congress (and the majority of the
American people) by refusing to accept a pull-out timetable.
I think these two things alone lay a good groundwork to move for
impeachment, and there'll undoubtedly be earlier 'issues' raised to
bolster their drive to get Bush and his Cabinet removed.
Dr. Bipolar
He should be impeached, even just for his looks..
HOOROO ☺☻♥
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: ***VERY SERIOUS ESCALATIONS, PEOPLEZ*** |
30 Mar 2007 10:47:52 PM |
|
|
On Mar 30, 6:47 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Dr. Bipolar" <doctorsalway...@theglobalasylum.com> wrote in message
news:460cbc80_4@newsfeed.slurp.net...
"Perseid" <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9903195517B9Arrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, <stargatedecember2...@yahoo.ca>
Spat the Words
The Fat Lady iz getting ready to crap on the fan !
I almost thought you said "The Fat Lady iz getting ready to
crap on Iran !"
This is the way I see it right now -- Congress knew that both resolutions
to pull US troops out by March 31, 2008, would be vetoed and that they
didn't have the necessary majority to override either veto.
If my theory is right, and it's only a theory, of course, then the veto of
both resolutions will lay the basic groundwork to seriously consider
drawing up articles of impeachment during the spring and summer months.
The situation is already that this adminstration had 'defied' the will of
congress earlier by continuing with the 'surge' or escalation in Iraq.
And, now, they are rejecting the will of Congress (and the majority of the
American people) by refusing to accept a pull-out timetable.
I think these two things alone lay a good groundwork to move for
impeachment, and there'll undoubtedly be earlier 'issues' raised to
bolster their drive to get Bush and his Cabinet removed.
Dr. Bipolar
He should be impeached, even just for his looks..
That "reasoning" makes exactly as much sense as Doc's "reasoning" for
grounds to impeach the President.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: ***VERY SERIOUS ESCALATIONS, PEOPLEZ*** |
31 Mar 2007 03:54:16 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175312872.643863.234710@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 30, 6:47 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Dr. Bipolar" <doctorsalway...@theglobalasylum.com> wrote in message
news:460cbc80_4@newsfeed.slurp.net...
"Perseid" <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9903195517B9Arrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation,
<stargatedecember2...@yahoo.ca>
Spat the Words
The Fat Lady iz getting ready to crap on the fan !
I almost thought you said "The Fat Lady iz getting ready to
crap on Iran !"
This is the way I see it right now -- Congress knew that both
resolutions
to pull US troops out by March 31, 2008, would be vetoed and that they
didn't have the necessary majority to override either veto.
If my theory is right, and it's only a theory, of course, then the veto
of
both resolutions will lay the basic groundwork to seriously consider
drawing up articles of impeachment during the spring and summer months.
The situation is already that this adminstration had 'defied' the will
of
congress earlier by continuing with the 'surge' or escalation in Iraq.
And, now, they are rejecting the will of Congress (and the majority of
the
American people) by refusing to accept a pull-out timetable.
I think these two things alone lay a good groundwork to move for
impeachment, and there'll undoubtedly be earlier 'issues' raised to
bolster their drive to get Bush and his Cabinet removed.
Dr. Bipolar
He should be impeached, even just for his looks..
That "reasoning" makes exactly as much sense as Doc's "reasoning" for
grounds to impeach the President.
.... and I wouldn't want to telll you what I think should happen to you!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Bipolar" |
|
| Title: Re: ***VERY SERIOUS ESCALATIONS, PEOPLEZ*** |
31 Mar 2007 05:02:44 PM |
|
|
"mukyuk" <a@b.com> wrote in message news:YkpPh.4637$6m4.817@pd7urf1no...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175312872.643863.234710@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 30, 6:47 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Dr. Bipolar" <doctorsalway...@theglobalasylum.com> wrote in message
news:460cbc80_4@newsfeed.slurp.net...
"Perseid" <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9903195517B9Arrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation,
<stargatedecember2...@yahoo.ca>
Spat the Words
The Fat Lady iz getting ready to crap on the fan !
I almost thought you said "The Fat Lady iz getting ready to
crap on Iran !"
This is the way I see it right now -- Congress knew that both
resolutions
to pull US troops out by March 31, 2008, would be vetoed and that
they
didn't have the necessary majority to override either veto.
If my theory is right, and it's only a theory, of course, then the
veto of
both resolutions will lay the basic groundwork to seriously consider
drawing up articles of impeachment during the spring and summer
months.
The situation is already that this adminstration had 'defied' the
will of
congress earlier by continuing with the 'surge' or escalation in
Iraq.
And, now, they are rejecting the will of Congress (and the majority
of the
American people) by refusing to accept a pull-out timetable.
I think these two things alone lay a good groundwork to move for
impeachment, and there'll undoubtedly be earlier 'issues' raised to
bolster their drive to get Bush and his Cabinet removed.
Dr. Bipolar
He should be impeached, even just for his looks..
That "reasoning" makes exactly as much sense as Doc's "reasoning" for
grounds to impeach the President.
... and I wouldn't want to telll you what I think should happen to
you!!!
When you 'reason' that your undying support for a leader that habitually
lies, bungles around, and gets lots of people killed and maimed for no
good 'reason' other than his self-righteous psychotic personality,
fantasy-oriented religious concepts, and his corporate friend's economic
windfalls, then I can easily justify my theory that such 'reasoning' from
this ***** and those who support him, is part of on ongoing high crime
against humanity -- in addition, to bucking the majority of the electorate
and their representative's attempts to keep this madman and his cohorts
from doing further murder and damage. I can't find a better moral reason
to get such a horrid leader outta' office ASAP, whether or not any
specific 'law' has been violated on the books.
If the House can vote on impreachment for Clinton for his perjury, then it
can move against a mass murderer, even if it takes every technical
contrivance to get the ***** out.
If Cheney is still around, it's highly doubtful he'd want to face the same
treatment by continuing with the self-righteous defiance that has
characterized this adminstrations' policy in Iraq, and led to Bush's
downfall. However, if he chose do so, then the same movement could be
started to remove him, as well. Every trick by conservatives to keep the
Iraq War going for another day, is one more incremental step to destroying
their own Party in 2008 and 2010, and perhaps beyond. There'd be a big
Republican push to keep Cheney from following his predecessor's disastrous
course, obstensibly to save their own necks.
Dr. Bipolar
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: ***VERY SERIOUS ESCALATIONS, PEOPLEZ*** |
29 Mar 2007 11:03:48 PM |
|
|
T24gTWFyIDI5LCA3OjQ4IHBtLCAi4pi6IC7CtzoqwqjCqCo6wrcuwrc6KsKowqgqOsK3LiAg4pml
IFVuY2xlIFdhbGx5IFJ1bGV6ICEKRlJJQ0sgeWVhaCAhIOKZoy4uLkhPT1JPTyAh4pmm4pmg4peY
4peL4peZ4pmC4pmA4pmq4pmr4pi84pa6LsK3OirCqMKoKjrCty4g4pml4pi6wqnCruKEoiIKPHN0
YXJnYXRlZGVjZW1iZXIyLi4uQHlhaG9vLmNhPiB3cm90ZToKPgo+IFRoZSBGYXQgTGFkeSBpeiBn
ZXR0aW5nIHJlYWR5IHRvIGNyYXAgb24gdGhlIGZhbiAhCgpGZWFybW9uZ2VyLgo=
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
very interesting, peoplez ;-)
A good article, peoplez, & so very very true -- well worth a read !
=?utf-8?q?Oh_well,_it'z_that_time_of_the_day_once_again_for_your_Uncle_Wally_to_say_once_again_to_all_of_his_favortie_peoplez_a_very_merry_HOOROO_&_whip_out_the_ol'_Spanish_dictionary_&_say_'_Lo_siento_ahora_tengo_que_Marcharme,_adios_amigos,_cheerio
=?utf-8?q?Oh_well,_it'z_that_time_of_the_day_yet_once_again_(believe_it_or_not_;-0_to_say_a_very_special__HOOROO_or_two_(or_3_or_4)_to_all_of_my_favorite_peoplez_out_there_in_APN_land,_so_heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeere_goes:_Adios,_A
=?utf-8?q?climate_change_peoplez_(remember,_peoplez,_that_we_can_no_longer_say_"Global_Warming"_coz_it's_not_politically_or_technically_correct,_it'll_be_a_mixture_of_global_warming_&_global_cooling_plus_a_lot_of_other_very_nasty_things_including_ris
Uh-oh, here'z what'z gonna happen very soon, peoplez !!!!
very interestingamundo weblog article peoplez -- pleaze read
Oh well, it'z that time of the day once again for your dearest old Uncle Wally to say HOOROO & Seasons Greeting & the very best of Salutations to all of his favorite peoplez out there in APN land
| so true so very very very very very very true, peoplez !!!!
this beautiful lady sums it up all very nicely, peoplez -- more power to peoplez such as this lady....hooroo !
*** VERY DISTURBING, PEOPLEZ !!!!!!! ***Prepare for the next round...FROM THE JPOST
sOME nice Chrissy reading for all of my favorite peoplez to have alittle Captain Cook at during their holiday festivities. Oh, & BTW, peoplez --Have yourselves a very MERRY CHRISTMAS & a jolly frickin' FantasmagoricallySplendiferous NEW YEAR !! HOORO
a VERY INTERESTING LETTER TO THE CONCORD MONITOR, PEOPLEZ !!!
This article from one year ago, but still very relevant today,peoplez !!! HOOROO !!!
very interesting peoplez !!!
|
|
|
