War looming with Iran? Bush and Rice turn up the heat
By Jerome R. Corsi
On her first world tour as secretary of state, Condi Rice has played
out a very interesting message regarding Iran.
First, she suggested diplomacy could solve the Iranian problem. To
stress this theme, Dr. Rice made it clear that war was not an option
currently on the table. The EU-3 and the mullahs smiled and breathed a
collective sigh of relief.
Yet, the operative word here was "currently." Dr. Rice also mentioned,
almost in passing, that the United States would leave all options
open, including war.
When Dr. Rice got to Brussels, the message appeared to sharpen. "The
Iranians need to hear that if they are unwilling to take the deal,
really, that the Europeans are giving … then the Security Council
looms." Did the message change? No, not really. The administration's
position remains clear: Iran will not be permitted to enrich uranium.
That is the underlying message – the message that has not varied.
What the Bush administration is demanding is that the mullahs must
make a clear stop to their development of nuclear weapons. If Iran
does not agree to stop a nuclear weapons program, or if we do not get
a reliable means of verifying that they have abandoned a nuclear
weapons program, then the United States is going to the Security
Council. Diplomacy can work, but it must produce a transparent,
verifiable agreement from the Iranians to give up their ambitions to
have an atomic bomb.
Does the Bush administration think the Iranians are likely to agree
seriously to stop developing nuclear weapons? Probably not. But if the
administration didn't endorse the negotiations gambit, then the
Democrats would start screaming that Bush was "trigger happy." Having
pounded Bush that Iraq was a pre-emptive war, the Democrats are primed
to scream bloody murder if Bush were to attack Iran as a first choice.
Sen. Rockefeller – a tried and true partisan bitterly opposed to any
U.S. intelligence effort aimed at protecting national security – has
already sounded off that intelligence about Iran needs to be examined
so we don't make the same mistake we made in Iraq. What mistake? The
weapons of mass destruction, of course. A gaggle of Democrats –
including Sens. Kerry, Kennedy and Biden – are itching to sound off
that the administration has failed a second time. We attacked Iraq and
Saddam Hussein did not have WMD stockpiles and now we are ready to
attack Iran and all they have is centrifuges.
These are the same Democrats who would demand another 9-11 commission
to blame Bush if the mullahs were to develop nuclear weapons they
could detonate over Tel Aviv or smuggle into New York city to detonate
as a terror attack.
What is the alternative recommended by the Democrats? Simple.
Negotiate, follow the Europeans, talk until everybody is blue in the
face and the mullahs have developed a bomb clandestinely. This week,
Russia also signaled that they are willing to finalize their agreement
to ship the mullahs the nuclear fuel they need to activate the reactor
at Bushehr.
That the Democrats failed once with this same strategy – in North
Korea under the Clinton administration – did not wise them up at all.
The strategy failed there to stop Kim Jong il from developing nuclear
weapons, so why not trust another rouge state and assume that the
mullahs would never lie?
The American public was not willing to put the nation's national
security in the hands of John Kerry for one very good reason – just
like he did in Vietnam, John Kerry doesn't seem to mind once again if
our sworn enemies beat us in the Middle East – just so we continue to
look good to the French.
Pretty soon the American people are going to get the point. The
Democrats have become the party of "NO" – no alternatives, no support
for America, no anything except "I hate Bush" rhetoric, sometimes
supplemented with what sounds like "I hate America" sub-themes.
Teddy Kennedy is sounding simply angry these days. Between Kennedy
growling, Howard Dean screaming, Al Gore pouting and John Kerry
feeling sorry for himself that he lost the election, the Democratic
Party is not looking very appealing to anybody ... unless of course
you hate Bush.
Condi Rice has given a clear and consistent message to the world.
Sure, we'll go the diplomatic route with the mullahs – just so we get
to the right destination on time. If the mullahs don't give up their
ambitions to possess nuclear weapons, right now, then we will go to
the Security Council very soon. Most likely the Security Council will
be totally ineffective, adding to their undistinguished
"oil-for-food-scandal" performance in Iraq.
So, where do we go from the Security Council? Well, war is an option
that is not on the table "for now," but when diplomacy fails, that may
change. With the Democrats in Congress, going to war takes a process
and that process has to involve steps – first we let the European
Union conduct negotiations, then we go to the United Nations, even if
both are really just a waste of time.
But don't get confused that Bush has lost sight of where he is headed.
The president will not deviate from his pursuit of freedom in the
Middle East, nor will he permit the mullahs to have a nuclear bomb, no
matter how loud the Democrats scream and shout, or how hard they cry
and pout.
When Bush talks about Iran, he speaks in firm, simple words that
cannot be misinterpreted. His advice to the mullahs: "Don't develop a
nuclear weapon." This is a message the mullahs with their terrorist
mentality will simply take as a challenge. They will most certainly
fail to take the advice.
Jerome R. Corsi received a Ph.D. from Harvard University in political
science in 1972 and has written many books and articles, including the
No. 1 New York Times best-seller, "Unfit for Command – Swift Boat
Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry." Dr. Corsi is an expert on
political violence and terrorism.
.
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
10 Feb 2005 10:05:19 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1108047503.1cc47bae1e2a23668d44d7d5a595183b@teranews...
War looming with Iran? Bush and Rice turn up the heat
How do you feel about that Tony? do you think it's inevitable
and would you support such action if your President wanted
to go ahead with it?
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
11 Feb 2005 11:02:32 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1108047503.1cc47bae1e2a23668d44d7d5a595183b@teranews...
War looming with Iran? Bush and Rice turn up the heat
How do you feel about that Tony? do you think it's inevitable
and would you support such action if your President wanted
to go ahead with it?
Inevitable? No, Iran can always choose to stop their production of
nuclear weapons which violate the treaty they signed with the rest of
the world.
Would I support it? By all means.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
11 Feb 2005 03:17:47 PM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1108141312.d85373137d3ab6f3934553aee81bf5a8@teranews...
War looming with Iran? Bush and Rice turn up the heat
How do you feel about that Tony? do you think it's inevitable
and would you support such action if your President wanted
to go ahead with it?
Inevitable? No, Iran can always choose to stop their production of
nuclear weapons which violate the treaty they signed with the rest of
the world.
Do you reckon they'll use them against our troops when Bush attacks?
Would I support it? By all means.
Of course you would, you're a good Russian.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
12 Feb 2005 08:40:56 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1108141312.d85373137d3ab6f3934553aee81bf5a8@teranews...
War looming with Iran? Bush and Rice turn up the heat
How do you feel about that Tony? do you think it's inevitable
and would you support such action if your President wanted
to go ahead with it?
Inevitable? No, Iran can always choose to stop their production of
nuclear weapons which violate the treaty they signed with the rest of
the world.
Do you reckon they'll use them against our troops when Bush attacks?
I should hope not, why are you rooting for them to?
Would I support it? By all means.
Of course you would, you're a good Russian.
You're a clown, if Iran continues to violate the world treaties that
they sign onto, then they deserve anything that comes their way.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
12 Feb 2005 10:56:44 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1108219217.44f0793db9bdb72fac362652702fe326@teranews...
Inevitable? No, Iran can always choose to stop their production of
nuclear weapons which violate the treaty they signed with the rest of
the world.
Do you reckon they'll use them against our troops when Bush attacks?
I should hope not, why are you rooting for them to?
Fear they will is more accurate, it's hard enough in combat without
being hampered by NBC kit and the potential use of tactical nukes.
Would I support it? By all means.
Of course you would, you're a good Russian.
You're a clown,
Maybe, seems to me you can't think for yourself. If your government says
they have weapons that are ready for deployment in 45 minutes you'll suck
that down and whoop with joy as you send more men and women to die on
behalf of your yellow skin and depraved lifestyle.
if Iran continues to violate the world treaties that
they sign onto, then they deserve anything that comes their way.
Strange, when others in here say that about the USA you get all defensive,
you don't think Iran might feel that way too?
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
12 Feb 2005 11:20:05 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1108219217.44f0793db9bdb72fac362652702fe326@teranews...
Inevitable? No, Iran can always choose to stop their production of
nuclear weapons which violate the treaty they signed with the rest of
the world.
Do you reckon they'll use them against our troops when Bush attacks?
I should hope not, why are you rooting for them to?
Fear they will is more accurate, it's hard enough in combat without
being hampered by NBC kit and the potential use of tactical nukes.
So then you should be on the forefront of those calling for Iran to
give up their nuclear program, yet you'e not.
Would I support it? By all means.
Of course you would, you're a good Russian.
You're a clown,
Maybe, seems to me you can't think for yourself. If your government says
they have weapons that are ready for deployment in 45 minutes you'll suck
that down and whoop with joy as you send more men and women to die on
behalf of your yellow skin and depraved lifestyle.
No, it wasn't only my government, it was yours as well, as well as
every other intelligence service in the world.
The aricle I posted today proves again that Saddam was actively
producing WMD.
if Iran continues to violate the world treaties that
they sign onto, then they deserve anything that comes their way.
Strange, when others in here say that about the USA you get all defensive,
you don't think Iran might feel that way too?
We haven't violated any signed treaty, what are you talking about?
Making things up are you?
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
13 Feb 2005 02:51:42 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1108228764.a7a76ceb3bc25b9db3c59add8faf8c09@teranews...
Fear they will is more accurate, it's hard enough in combat without
being hampered by NBC kit and the potential use of tactical nukes.
So then you should be on the forefront of those calling for Iran to
give up their nuclear program, yet you'e not.
How do you know? you think bleating uselessly in here like you do is
the place to achieve political aims Tony? How dumb are you?
Maybe, seems to me you can't think for yourself. If your government says
they have weapons that are ready for deployment in 45 minutes you'll suck
that down and whoop with joy as you send more men and women to die on
behalf of your yellow skin and depraved lifestyle.
No, it wasn't only my government, it was yours as well, as well as
every other intelligence service in the world.
Not every, plenty apparently criticised the information. You'll also note
that even the intelligence specialists said none of them used the definitive
language that the politicians came out with. Unlike you though I'll treat
any such claims my government and yours comes out with for Iran with a
whopping great dose of salt because they've been proved to be liars with
the last lot.
The aricle I posted today proves again that Saddam was actively
producing WMD.
No it doesn't. It's the opnion piece of a single person. There's not one iota
of proof but there you are sucking it down because it reinforces everything
you *want* to believe. Your government must love blinkered morons like you
who have no ability for independant thought and believe any piece of crap
that drifts down to you.
Strange, when others in here say that about the USA you get all defensive,
you don't think Iran might feel that way too?
We haven't violated any signed treaty, what are you talking about?
Do try to read what's typed Tony... Iran will likely feel it's next on the
list for invasion so they'll feel and act defensive. Get it dumdum?
Making things up are you?
Nah I leave stupidity like that to you. You're the idiot that can't prove
any of the lies you like to hide behind.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
13 Feb 2005 10:45:58 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1108228764.a7a76ceb3bc25b9db3c59add8faf8c09@teranews...
Fear they will is more accurate, it's hard enough in combat without
being hampered by NBC kit and the potential use of tactical nukes.
So then you should be on the forefront of those calling for Iran to
give up their nuclear program, yet you'e not.
How do you know? you think bleating uselessly in here like you do is
theplace to achieve political aims Tony? How dumb are you?
How dumb are you? What is yopur purpose here, too not discuss things?
Maybe, seems to me you can't think for yourself. If your government says
they have weapons that are ready for deployment in 45 minutes you'll suck
that down and whoop with joy as you send more men and women to die on
behalf of your yellow skin and depraved lifestyle.
No, it wasn't only my government, it was yours as well, as well as
every other intelligence service in the world.
Not every, plenty apparently criticised the information.
Who? Iran? Syria? Give me a break.
The aricle I posted today proves again that Saddam was actively
producing WMD.
No it doesn't.
Of coruse it does, it came from the mouth of one of the most qualified
inspectors to go into Iraq.
You just can't accept it.
Strange, when others in here say that about the USA you get all defensive,
you don't think Iran might feel that way too?
We haven't violated any signed treaty, what are you talking about?
Do try to read what's typed Tony... Iran will likely feel it's next on the
list for invasion so they'll feel and act defensive. Get it dumdum?
So what?
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
14 Feb 2005 03:07:26 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1108313115.1f852be7ff2e6fbffe1b3f19a2aed71d@teranews...
So then you should be on the forefront of those calling for Iran to
give up their nuclear program, yet you'e not.
How do you know? you think bleating uselessly in here like you do is
theplace to achieve political aims Tony? How dumb are you?
How dumb are you? What is yopur purpose here, too not discuss things?
How does your whining and bleating in here affect anything in real life
Tony? how does your constant display of your narrow minded views
change a single thing you post about? You're the idiot that pretends
you're "proving" something in here, to whom? you're already stupid
enough to believe all the crap you cut-and-paste in here, who else
does Tony?
Come on dummy, what has your many years of posting in here achieved?
Name a single thing all your bleating has actually done.
No, it wasn't only my government, it was yours as well, as well as
every other intelligence service in the world.
Not every, plenty apparently criticised the information.
Who? Iran? Syria? Give me a break.
Tsk tsk there were Western nations who disagreed with the 45 minute claim,
Pacific Rim, Far East too. The point being you're still ready to believe the
***** the politicians made up even now after they've been proved as lies and
after the intelligence services themselves said they never made any such
unequivocable assessments.
The aricle I posted today proves again that Saddam was actively
producing WMD.
No it doesn't.
Of coruse it does, it came from the mouth of one of the most qualified
inspectors to go into Iraq.
Where's the proof you claim is in that report? not one thing has been
proven, it's the opinion piece of a military mouthpiece. You'll believe it
despite not a single physical piece of evidence having been found to date
because you're incapable of thinking for yourself and it suits your
pathetic bigotry and hatred.
You just can't accept it.
I'll accept proof not opinion.
We haven't violated any signed treaty, what are you talking about?
Do try to read what's typed Tony... Iran will likely feel it's next on the
list for invasion so they'll feel and act defensive. Get it dumdum?
So what?
I didn't say the USA had violated any treaty, that's so what.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
14 Feb 2005 07:55:53 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1108313115.1f852be7ff2e6fbffe1b3f19a2aed71d@teranews...
So then you should be on the forefront of those calling for Iran to
give up their nuclear program, yet you'e not.
No, it wasn't only my government, it was yours as well, as well as
every other intelligence service in the world.
Not every, plenty apparently criticised the information.
Who? Iran? Syria? Give me a break.
Tsk tsk there were Western nations who disagreed with the 45 minute claim,
Pacific Rim, Far East too.
Who France and Germany? ROFLMAO!!!!
The aricle I posted today proves again that Saddam was actively
producing WMD.
No it doesn't.
Of coruse it does, it came from the mouth of one of the most qualified
inspectors to go into Iraq.
Where's the proof you claim is in that report? not one thing has been
proven, it's the opinion piece of a military mouthpiece. You'll believe it
despite not a single physical piece of evidence having been found to date
because you're incapable of thinking for yourself and it suits your
pathetic bigotry and hatred.
You just can't accept it.
I'll accept proof not opinion.
We haven't violated any signed treaty, what are you talking about?
Do try to read what's typed Tony... Iran will likely feel it's next on the
list for invasion so they'll feel and act defensive. Get it dumdum?
So what?
I didn't say the USA had violated any treaty, that's so what.
So what are you whining about?
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
14 Feb 2005 10:39:43 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1108389313.9903742776fba78441e96642b3716cbe@teranews...
Oops Tony you forgot to answer this...
"How does your whining and bleating in here affect anything in real life
Tony? how does your constant display of your narrow minded views
change a single thing you post about? You're the idiot that pretends
you're "proving" something in here, to whom? you're already stupid
enough to believe all the crap you cut-and-paste in here, who else
does Tony?"
What's up dude, no answer eh?
"Come on dummy, what has your many years of posting in here achieved?
Name a single thing all your bleating has actually done."
Another point you've conceded then by running away.
Tsk tsk there were Western nations who disagreed with the 45 minute claim,
Pacific Rim, Far East too.
Who France and Germany? ROFLMAO!!!!
Yet *you* said "No, it wasn't only my government, it was yours as well, as well as
every other intelligence service in the world."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Note that last part Tony, looks like you're wrong *again* eh?
It doesn't matter that you dismiss them, where are the WMD? where are the
ones that were supposed to have been held at field level for deployment against
our troops? the Iraqi's ran and, suprise suprise, not a single one turned up.
More than 1500 of our troops have died to date for a war against WMD, not
for regime change, not for helping the poor Iraqi's for WMD. Their deaths
and those of the 100,000+ Iraqi's that have died to date weren't for WMD
were they Tony?
Where's the proof you claim is in that report? not one thing has been
proven, it's the opinion piece of a military mouthpiece. You'll believe it
despite not a single physical piece of evidence having been found to date
because you're incapable of thinking for yourself and it suits your
pathetic bigotry and hatred.
Well well another point you ran away from you gutless coward. So
much for your insisting on facts eh? you lying twat.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
15 Feb 2005 11:18:28 PM |
|
|
"Krib" <kribuk@gmailREMOVECAPS.com> Spat the Words
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1108389313.9903742776fba78441e96642b3716cbe@teranews...
Oops Tony you forgot to answer this...
"How does your whining and bleating in here affect anything in real life
Tony? how does your constant display of your narrow minded views
change a single thing you post about? You're the idiot that pretends
you're "proving" something in here, to whom? you're already stupid
enough to believe all the crap you cut-and-paste in here, who else
does Tony?"
What's up dude, no answer eh?
"Come on dummy, what has your many years of posting in here achieved?
Name a single thing all your bleating has actually done."
I think the effect tony has is to drive people away from the
neocon agenda. The neocons would probably want to dis-own tony.
Sucks to be him... an outcast among his own group because he's
such a freaking moron.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Robinson" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
14 Feb 2005 11:17:17 PM |
|
|
Tony is right.
There were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, prior to 1991. After 1991
however slowly but surely the weapons programs were dismantled. If Saddam
had a plan to ship perfume filled with deadly chemicals to the US and
Europe, then its possible that plan was put developed before 1991, the
article is vague about the timing of this plan, their fore one would have to
conclude its misleading in nature.
What I think is funny is that Tony tends to take make some interesting
statements, e.g. The Europeans said, We do not know what sort of weapons
Iraq has, or is developing, give the UN search teams time to make their own
Datamations about the current state of Iraq's weapons programs.
Tony and most of the right wing nut cases in the US took this as. The
Europeans agree with us that Saddam has weapons of mass destruction we must
invade before he uses them against us.
Tony fails to recognise the sutle differences between what is said, and what
he wants to hear.
As for war with Iran? Is it possible that since the invasion of Iraq
cooperation between Iran, Syria and North Korea has been stepped up, could a
war with one mean a war with all? I am not sure the US currently has the
physical numbers of troops to wage war with Iran, at least not without help
from its European allies.
Daniel
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
15 Feb 2005 06:21:59 AM |
|
|
"Daniel Robinson" <DJ.Robinson@xtra.co.nz> wrote in message
news:cCfQd.1549$1S4.156253@news.xtra.co.nz...
Tony is right.
Does not compute.
There were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, prior to 1991.
Indeed, and we've got the receipts to prove it, as the old (but true) gag
goes. I don't think anyone is arguing against that.
After 1991 however slowly but surely the weapons programs were
dismantled.
Well, the majority of the facilities were destroyed so the "dismantling" was
pretty insantaneous. In the years afterwards he was a contained threat and
didn't produce anything new - as the Iraq Survey Group confirmed. Sure,
there might be a few piles of pre 1991 artillery shells lying around with
Sarin in, but they aren't much use to anyone and more of a hazard to anyone
who might handle those shells.
If Saddam had a plan to ship perfume filled with deadly chemicals to the
US and
Europe, then its possible that plan was put developed before 1991, the
article is vague about the timing of this plan, their fore one would have
to
conclude its misleading in nature.
So it's just more wild-assed speculation.Therefore, Tony != RIGHT. (in fact
you may as well #define _TONY_ FALSE). There's a lot of money in ripping
off perfume - perhaps it was one of Uday's schemes?
What I think is funny is that Tony tends to take make some interesting
statements, e.g. The Europeans said, We do not know what sort of weapons
Iraq has, or is developing, give the UN search teams time to make their
own
Datamations about the current state of Iraq's weapons programs.
In the case of MI5, they are VERY ***** taht 1) Bliar cherry-picked
their assemssment to provide the scariest possible picture of Saddam's
capabilities he could against their judgement and even more ***** that
2) he then BLAMED THEM when it turned out the WMD wasn't anything like HE
protrayed it!
Tony and most of the right wing nut cases in the US took this as. The
Europeans agree with us that Saddam has weapons of mass destruction we
must
invade before he uses them against us.
Tony fails to recognise the sutle differences between what is said, and
what
he wants to hear.
Absolutely correct.Tonty is a walking catalogue of logical fallacy.
As for war with Iran? Is it possible that since the invasion of Iraq
cooperation between Iran, Syria and North Korea has been stepped up, could
a
war with one mean a war with all?
North Korea can't do much to help Syria and Iran out. They have no "force
protection" (e.g. Aircraft carriers, long range bombers, ICBMs etc etc) so
other than sit around issuing press releases about Capitalist Imperialits
Running Dogs and eating kimchee they don't have many options. ther nuclear
programme hasn't managed to produce anything more powerful than a hiroshima
type bomb, and they haven't the means to deliver it (well, they might be
able to clip alaska and toast a few polar bears)
I am not sure the US currently has the
physical numbers of troops to wage war with Iran, at least not without
help
from its European allies.
Notice Rice and Rumsfeld doing their little bridge-building tour in Europe
last week? I wonder where that's heading...
Daniel
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Wally_Lorne=99?=" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
15 Feb 2005 02:30:50 AM |
|
|
That's one powderkeg we *DON"T* want to see being ignited....
If so, goodbye Syria, Israel & Iran for starters !!!
It's all frickin' MAD !!!!
We humans will become extinct & all the insects will mutate
& take over the planet after the nuclear holocaust !!!
Hooroo / Toodles
Uncle Wally
=============================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
15 Feb 2005 06:23:37 AM |
|
|
"Wally LorneT" <wallylorne@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:1108456250.357099.237550@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
That's one powderkeg we *DON"T* want to see being ignited....
If so, goodbye Syria, Israel & Iran for starters !!!
It's all frickin' MAD !!!!
We humans will become extinct & all the insects will mutate
& take over the planet after the nuclear holocaust !!!
I doubt it - who's got the weapons? Not Iran, not Syria and North Korea
woudl be punching well above its weight seeing as it has only a handful of
<> 20 kt devices and no suitable delivery system.
Hooroo / Toodles
Uncle Wally
=============================================
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "up" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
12 Feb 2005 11:44:54 AM |
|
|
On 12-Feb-2005, wrote:
We haven't violated any signed treaty, what are you talking about?
Making things up are you?
Tony
http://www.unitedstatesgovernment.net/violatinginternationaltreaties.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
11 Feb 2005 03:45:44 PM |
|
|
Funny that with just about every neighbour Iran has, has got a nuke,
besides as the Indians and Pakistanis claimed it is the only way to get
the attention of the West, just implement a nuclear program, and
secretaries of state will almost reside in your land with briefcases of
money for all the concerned parties.
The case for WMD however might be choose a toxin and see if we get it.
LB
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
13 Feb 2005 10:40:51 AM |
|
|
"leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au" <leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au> Spat the Words
Funny that with just about every neighbour Iran has, has got a nuke,
besides as the Indians and Pakistanis claimed it is the only way to get
the attention of the West, just implement a nuclear program, and
secretaries of state will almost reside in your land with briefcases of
money for all the concerned parties.
The case for WMD however might be choose a toxin and see if we get it.
LB
But think of all the oil and natural gas Iran has. I can't
see how Bush can pass up the chance for a slick little invasion
under the guise of putting down the evil Iranian mullahs.
And then there's Kazekstan, just up the road from Iran, and
chock full of natural resources.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
12 Feb 2005 08:46:18 AM |
|
|
Funny that with just about every neighbour Iran has, has got a nuke,
LB
Really? Just about every neighbor?
Hmmm, let's see, Iran share a border with Iraq, Afghanistan, Turkey,
Turkmentistan, Azerbjan, Armenia, nope, no nukes there.
Oh wait, yes, Pakistan does have nukes, but that's one out of seven,
care to rephrase that?
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
17 Feb 2005 06:18:23 PM |
|
|
That is what you are told, however we know Israel has some and who else
is debateable, but you know how an arms race works... just gotta get,
the new mice trap.
LB
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?q?The_Psychedelic_Pope=99?=" |
|
| Title: Re: War looming with Iran? |
17 Feb 2005 06:25:49 PM |
|
|
I heard they were threatening theirself
with war if they didn't stop watching all
the spy plane drones that were wating
them.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Iran declares war on U.S.
Re: Schroeder Slams War Threat against Iran ....14/8/5
False Prophet Hal Lindsay Wants War On Iran
Re: The coming Iran-Israel war.
DAY ONE - THE WAR WITH IRAN
WORLD WAR III NEWS, MONDAY, FEBRUARY 13TH, 2006...US WILL HIT IRAN IF TALKS FAIL
WORLD WAR III NEWS, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14TH, 2006 -- TARGET IRAN - PREPARATIONS BY ALL
DO NOT Underestimate the CHINA FACTOR - (Iran Oil World War 111)
| WORLD WAR III NEWS, SUNDAY, MARCH 12th, 2006 AD....Iran threatens to use oil as weapon
World War III NEWS, Wednesday, April 5th, 2006 AD.....Iran says it can handle any invasion
WORLD WAR III NEWS, Sunday, April 9th, 2006 AD........Report: U.S. plans air attack on Iran; IAEA inspectors in Tehran
World War III NEWS,Thursday, April 27th, 2006 AD.....Iran threatens global retaliation if US attacks
World War III NEWS, Saturday, April 29th, 2006 AD....Iran hurls defiance as UN braces itself for a nuclear showdown
World War III NEWS, Wednesday, May 3rd, 2006 AD...Iran will hit Israel if US does "evil".
World War III NEWS, Friday, May 5th, 2006 AD....Iran military plays down threat to strike Israel
|
|
|
