You notice how the tabloids were constantly following around the Bush
twins around to bars in the beginning?
What stopped all that?
Was it common decency?
Was it the anthrax sent to the "American Media" building that houses
those tabloids?
When has a tabloid ever had common decency and shown respect of others
in the spotlight?
Just was wondering...
sUSAn
.
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Was It The Anthrax? Or? |
18 Feb 2004 08:34:06 AM |
|
|
tugbertswife@webtv.net
wrote:
You notice how the tabloids were constantly following around the Bush
twins around to bars in the beginning?
What stopped all that?
Was it common decency?
Was it the anthrax sent to the "American Media" building that houses
those tabloids?
When has a tabloid ever had common decency and shown respect of others
in the spotlight?
Just was wondering...
sUSAn
Got a bug up your ***** about the Bush family?
I don't know what newspapers or magazines you read, but I see quite a few
stories about the Bush girls being reported. Just last week they had one of the
girls "dirty dancing" at some club.
So what is your problem?
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Was It The Anthrax? Or? |
18 Feb 2004 05:04:55 PM |
|
|
In article <20040218093406.24672.00002197@mb-m13.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
tugbertswife@webtv.net
wrote:
You notice how the tabloids were constantly following around the Bush
twins around to bars in the beginning?
What stopped all that?
Was it common decency?
Was it the anthrax sent to the "American Media" building that houses
those tabloids?
When has a tabloid ever had common decency and shown respect of others
in the spotlight?
Just was wondering...
sUSAn
Got a bug up your ***** about the Bush family?
I don't know what newspapers or magazines you read, but I see quite a few
stories about the Bush girls being reported. Just last week they had one of the
girls "dirty dancing" at some club.
I don't read tabloids, but I haven't seen any stories on them since they were
getting drunk on their collective you-know-what while under age. Oh, and having
Secret Service agents bail their boyfriend out of jail. I didn't see any dirty
dancing stuff - maybe it's considered too tame for their image?
So what is your problem?
Well, usually the tabloids don't just stop reporting on people who consistently
give them easy pickins'. You'll note that sUSAn was referring to tabloids.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "sUSAn B Anthony" |
|
| Title: Re: Was It The Anthrax? Or? |
18 Feb 2004 09:04:32 PM |
|
|
Woods wrote:
Tony wrote:
So what is your problem?
I have no problem with the Bush family. It is no secret how I feel about
George.
I asked some questions about this because I wanted to hear other
opinions about it.
Thanks for responding. What is Dirty-Dancing?
Well, usually the tabloids don't just stop
reporting on people who consistently
give them easy pickins'. You'll note that
sUSAn was referring to tabloids.
Oh! I NEVER *actually* BUY THE TABLOIDS!
;)
They are always *in-yo'face* at the check-out line at the supermarket.
I often find myself having a good laugh with total strangers over the
cover story.
"Batboy Leads the Troops to Saddam's Hideaway!" LOL!
The WWN often has Nostradamus on the cover. Nosty and Batboy.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Was It The Anthrax? Or? |
19 Feb 2004 12:22:38 PM |
|
|
(sUSAn B Anthony) wrote in message news:<11458-403427C0-46@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net>...
What stopped all that?
Was it common decency?
My theory was it complaints, like me ( And many others) to major media
outlets that kept running the drinking stories about the twins while
leaving 'poor' Chelsea out of the loop , even though she was falling
down in clubs, dead drunk, quite often.
If you report on one side you should report on the other side - that
is the newsman/women's creed. Although, I find still this is heavily
bias toward the left-wingers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Was It The Anthrax? Or? |
19 Feb 2004 04:49:05 PM |
|
|
In article <dd3256f0.0402191022.523548a6@posting.google.com>, (Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
tugbertswife@webtv.net (sUSAn B Anthony) wrote in message
news:<11458-403427C0-46@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net>...
What stopped all that?
Was it common decency?
My theory was it complaints, like me ( And many others) to major media
outlets that kept running the drinking stories about the twins while
leaving 'poor' Chelsea out of the loop , even though she was falling
down in clubs, dead drunk, quite often.
Yeah, but a single kid that's of drinking age doesn't make for nearly as tawdry
a story as 2 kids who are under age.
If you report on one side you should report on the other side - that
is the newsman/women's creed. Although, I find still this is heavily
bias toward the left-wingers.
I dunno - they sure reported an awful lot about Monica, to the detriment of
hearing about anything that Clinton was up to in regards to (ab)use of his
executive powers.
It's all about titillating the masses now, not reporting the news. Sad, but
that's the way it's gone in the past 10 years or so.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Was It The Anthrax? Or? |
19 Feb 2004 10:55:55 PM |
|
|
(Woodswun) wrote in message news:<B3bZb.30228$um1.23573@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <dd3256f0.0402191022.523548a6@posting.google.com>, (Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
tugbertswife@webtv.net (sUSAn B Anthony) wrote in message
news:<11458-403427C0-46@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net>...
What stopped all that?
Was it common decency?
My theory was it complaints, like me ( And many others) to major media
outlets that kept running the drinking stories about the twins while
leaving 'poor' Chelsea out of the loop , even though she was falling
down in clubs, dead drunk, quite often.
Yeah, but a single kid that's of drinking age doesn't make for nearly as tawdry
a story as 2 kids who are under age.
If you report on one side you should report on the other side - that
is the newsman/women's creed. Although, I find still this is heavily
bias toward the left-wingers.
I dunno - they sure reported an awful lot about Monica, to the detriment of
hearing about anything that Clinton was up to in regards to (ab)use of his
executive powers.
Nope: In fact the three major networks had less that 12 minuets of
coverage on Bill Clinton selling banned nuclear weapons list materials
to China and N. Korea.
Although there has been 1000s of hours by these same major three on
the subject of Iran-Contra (Reagan). That is called Bias.
It's all about titillating the masses now, not reporting the news.
Agree, and that is part of the point here.
Sad, but
that's the way it's gone in the past 10 years or so.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Was It The Anthrax? Or? |
20 Feb 2004 09:24:35 AM |
|
|
In article <dd3256f0.0402192055.48056283@posting.google.com>, (Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote in message
news:<B3bZb.30228$um1.23573@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <dd3256f0.0402191022.523548a6@posting.google.com>,
(Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
tugbertswife@webtv.net (sUSAn B Anthony) wrote in message
news:<11458-403427C0-46@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net>...
What stopped all that?
Was it common decency?
My theory was it complaints, like me ( And many others) to major media
outlets that kept running the drinking stories about the twins while
leaving 'poor' Chelsea out of the loop , even though she was falling
down in clubs, dead drunk, quite often.
Yeah, but a single kid that's of drinking age doesn't make for nearly as
tawdry
a story as 2 kids who are under age.
If you report on one side you should report on the other side - that
is the newsman/women's creed. Although, I find still this is heavily
bias toward the left-wingers.
I dunno - they sure reported an awful lot about Monica, to the detriment of
hearing about anything that Clinton was up to in regards to (ab)use of his
executive powers.
Nope: In fact the three major networks had less that 12 minuets of
coverage on Bill Clinton selling banned nuclear weapons list materials
to China and N. Korea.
Although there has been 1000s of hours by these same major three on
the subject of Iran-Contra (Reagan). That is called Bias.
The switchover from qualified journalists reporting real news to airheads
"reporting" gossip and sound bites occurred during Clinton's time in office.
Wasn't just in politics - it affects all aspects of modern American "news"
broadcasting. These people are idiots - I suspect they're out of work actors.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Bellamy" |
|
| Title: Re: Was It The Anthrax? Or? |
19 Feb 2004 02:05:50 PM |
|
|
sUSAn B Anthony wrote:
You notice how the tabloids were constantly following around the Bush
twins around to bars in the beginning?
What stopped all that?
Was it common decency?
Decency from the tabloids????
No, they quit buggin' the girls when they turned 21. Getting
shitfaced is no story any more.
-BB
.
|
|
|
| User: "sUSAn B Anthony" |
|
| Title: Re: Was It The Anthrax? Or? |
20 Feb 2004 08:51:49 PM |
|
|
Robert Bellamy wrote:
What stopped all that?
Was it common decency?
Decency from the tabloids????
LOL! I know, I know!
They have followed the murdered little girl "Jon Benet Ramsey's" parents
around for years.
The only lower form of life than the tabloid is a lawyer.
No, they quit buggin' the girls when they
turned 21. Getting shitfaced is no story
any more.
It's also not very fun anymore. when it is legal. ;)
-BB
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
