Watergate of the Democrats



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Watergate of the Democrats

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"
Date: 26 Jul 2004 03:58:27 PM
Object: Watergate of the Democrats
Comment: Looks like Liberals are just not making this watergate type
hype. I mean this is just as bad.
Sunday, July 25, 2004 2:47 p.m. EDT
Millennium Docs Destroyed by Berger Before 9/11 Hearings
NewsMax - Most of the existing drafts of the White House's
After-Action Millennium Plot Review were stolen from the National
Archives and destroyed by former National Security Advisor Sandy
Berger at least six months before the Sept. 11 Commission dealt with
Millennium issues in interim staff conclusions and public hearings.
A chronological review of hearings and staff statement transcripts
available on the 9/11 Commission Web site shows that the Millennium
plot was not covered in any detail until public hearings in March and
April 2004, more than six months after the Berger thefts.
Story Continues Below

Over four sessions on March 23-24 and April 13-14, Commission
transcripts show a total of 96 references to both the Millennium plot
and the after-action review.
Before the Berger document destruction in September and October 2003,
however, a search through Commission transcripts covering five
separate hearings turns up just five mentions of the Millennium plot.
Berger's attorney, Lanny Breuer, acknowledged to the Washington Post
on Sunday that his client's last visit to the National Archives came
on Oct. 2, 2003, two days before archives officials told Berger he was
suspected of removing documents.
Those same officials told the Post that they had five or six drafts of
the Millennium after-action review in their files, all of which were
eventually stolen by Berger. Only two copies were returned, the Post
said, noting, "other drafts of the after-action document, [Archives
officials] said, were apparently discarded."
On Sunday, Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton insisted that
investigators had reviewed every Millennium Review draft that the
Archives had in their files, telling NBC's "Meet the Press," We
believe we've seen all the documents. ... We're quite sure we've seen
all the documents in full."
But the Commission's first staff statement on any topic wasn't
released till Jan. 26, 2004 - a full four months after Berger had
destroyed most of the copies of the Millennium after-action review
stored at the Archives.
While Democrats have argued that the Millennium reports destroyed by
Berger were copies, the New York Post reported on Friday, "Officials
say it is possible he also got some unique documents directly from the
files" - an apparent reference to oringinal handwritten notes made by
senior Clinton officials on the draft copies.
Neither Hamilton nor Commission Chairman Tom Kean have given any
public assurances that every draft of the Millennium review, complete
with original notes, had been seen by investigators before Berger
destroyed them.
http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/7/25/145748.shtml
.

User: "R. Foreman"

Title: Re: Watergate of the Democrats 29 Jul 2004 10:06:37 AM
(Michael Johnathan McDonald) Spat the Words
So now the Republicans get interested in issues of terrorism.
Hindsight is always 20-20 of course. Bush wouldn't even meet
with the terrorism czar Richard Clarke until 9 months into
office and Bush spent most of that time on a golf course and
NOW you're obsessed with what Clinton's Administration knew
about terrorism.
You neocons are either stupid or just have bad timing. Often
the two go hand in hand.

Comment: Looks like Liberals are just not making this watergate type
hype. I mean this is just as bad.


Sunday, July 25, 2004 2:47 p.m. EDT
Millennium Docs Destroyed by Berger Before 9/11 Hearings

NewsMax - Most of the existing drafts of the White House's
After-Action Millennium Plot Review were stolen from the National
Archives and destroyed by former National Security Advisor Sandy
Berger at least six months before the Sept. 11 Commission dealt with
Millennium issues in interim staff conclusions and public hearings.

A chronological review of hearings and staff statement transcripts
available on the 9/11 Commission Web site shows that the Millennium
plot was not covered in any detail until public hearings in March and
April 2004, more than six months after the Berger thefts.

Story Continues Below



Over four sessions on March 23-24 and April 13-14, Commission
transcripts show a total of 96 references to both the Millennium plot
and the after-action review.
Before the Berger document destruction in September and October 2003,
however, a search through Commission transcripts covering five
separate hearings turns up just five mentions of the Millennium plot.

Berger's attorney, Lanny Breuer, acknowledged to the Washington Post
on Sunday that his client's last visit to the National Archives came
on Oct. 2, 2003, two days before archives officials told Berger he was
suspected of removing documents.

Those same officials told the Post that they had five or six drafts of
the Millennium after-action review in their files, all of which were
eventually stolen by Berger. Only two copies were returned, the Post
said, noting, "other drafts of the after-action document, [Archives
officials] said, were apparently discarded."

On Sunday, Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton insisted that
investigators had reviewed every Millennium Review draft that the
Archives had in their files, telling NBC's "Meet the Press," We
believe we've seen all the documents. ... We're quite sure we've seen
all the documents in full."

But the Commission's first staff statement on any topic wasn't
released till Jan. 26, 2004 - a full four months after Berger had
destroyed most of the copies of the Millennium after-action review
stored at the Archives.

While Democrats have argued that the Millennium reports destroyed by
Berger were copies, the New York Post reported on Friday, "Officials
say it is possible he also got some unique documents directly from the
files" - an apparent reference to oringinal handwritten notes made by
senior Clinton officials on the draft copies.

Neither Hamilton nor Commission Chairman Tom Kean have given any
public assurances that every draft of the Millennium review, complete
with original notes, had been seen by investigators before Berger
destroyed them.



http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/7/25/145748.shtml

.

User: "TonyZ2001"

Title: Re: Watergate of the Democrats 27 Jul 2004 05:27:41 AM
Notice how the Media has buried Sandy Burglar's crime so deep that it's not
even mentioned any more.
Tony
.
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: Watergate of the Democrats 27 Jul 2004 10:45:41 AM
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20040727062741.19394.00002471@mb-m04.aol.com>...

Notice how the Media has buried Sandy Burglar's crime so deep that it's not
even mentioned any more.

Yep.
Only Fox is reporting this, you know the station that the left media
detests and calls unfair.


Tony

.

User: "Grantland"

Title: Re: Watergate of the Democrats 27 Jul 2004 08:26:49 AM
(TonyZ2001) wrote:

Notice how the Media has buried Sandy Burglar's crime so deep that it's not
even mentioned any more.

Tony

Jews control your media. Fact. Check it out. Berger is a Jew. Fact. The truth and
nothing but the truth.
Grantland
.

User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: Watergate of the Democrats 27 Jul 2004 05:39:24 PM
In article <20040727062741.19394.00002471@mb-m04.aol.com>,
(TonyZ2001) wrote:

Notice how the Media has buried Sandy Burglar's crime so deep that it's not
even mentioned any more.

I'm guessing you haven't noticed that *everything* has been getting cycled out
very quickly in the past few months. The days of the press obssessing over a
single story seem to have temporarily abated. Besides, Berger isn't doing
anything of interest to the media, so they have no reason to bother following it
with a Convention going on to occupy their microscopic little minds.
Woods
.
User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android"

Title: Re: Watergate of the Democrats 27 Jul 2004 06:37:18 PM
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:39:24 GMT, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote:

In article <20040727062741.19394.00002471@mb-m04.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:

Notice how the Media has buried Sandy Burglar's crime so deep that it's
not
even mentioned any more.


I'm guessing you haven't noticed that *everything* has been getting
cycled out
very quickly in the past few months. The days of the press obssessing
over a
single story seem to have temporarily abated. Besides, Berger isn't
doing
anything of interest to the media, so they have no reason to bother
following it
with a Convention going on to occupy their microscopic little minds.

Woods

Yeah really ... it's not like MonicaGate ... if Berger had have gotten a
***** while taking the papers from the archive it'd still be frontpage
news ...
The American media treats their consumers like idiots and most consumers
respond accordingly.
.


User: "Tadapope"

Title: Re: Watergate of the Democrats 27 Jul 2004 07:58:12 PM
Sandy Burglar got a presidental pardon.
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all 21 universes constantly and at random.
Oh Joy & Lysergically Yours!
Tom
The Psychedelick Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
Saint Isadore of Laytonville
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.
User: "R. Foreman"

Title: Re: Watergate of the Democrats 29 Jul 2004 10:00:58 AM
(Tadapope) Spat the Words

Sandy Burglar got a presidental pardon.

Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all 21 universes constantly and at random.
Oh Joy & Lysergically Yours!

I can't argue with this logic.

Tom

The Psychedelick Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
Saint Isadore of Laytonville

http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/



.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER