| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"The Angry Hierophant" |
| Date: |
11 Jul 2005 10:00:04 AM |
| Object: |
Were Srebrenica and Zepa left to the Serbians as part of a peace agreement? |
The commission said in the report's conclusion: "A shocking question,
but not asking it will be even more shocking. Was Srebrenica the result
of a policy that aims t easing the negotiations in order to reshape the
Ethnic Map of Bosnia and Herzegovina? Was the city lost as a result of
a decision taken in Paris, London, Washington and even in Sarajevo?"
The report also noted thatsin order to figure this out one needs to
look at the maps of Bosnia and Herzegovina made before July 1995 and
after July 1995 and also the chronology of the events. The report
emphasizes from this perspective that the enemy brothers made an
agreement to share Bosnian territory only four months after the fall of
Srebrenica. The silence of Western leaders regarding the fall of Zepa,
another security zone, following the fall of Srebrenica despite claims
that Serbians were undertaking ethnic genocide in Srebrenica hardens
this thesis.
===================================================================
***** THE FILTHY STINKING WH*RE OF B*BYL*N!
YOU **NEED** TO READ REVELATION 18 NOW, ASSHOLES!
___
/
___/
\ \ /
\ \/
THE SYMBOL OF GOD'S WRATH. THERE WERE 7 SEALS, 7 TRUMPETS, AND WE ARE
ABOUT TO SEE THE SEVENTH BOWL. ***** YOU.
Rev 16:17 And the seventh angel poured out his vial into the air; and
there came a great voice out of the temple of heaven, from the throne,
saying, It is done.
Rev 16:18 And there were voices, and thunders, and lightnings; and
there was a great earthquake, such as was not since men were upon the
earth, so mighty an earthquake, [and] so great.
Rev 16:19 And the great city was divided into three parts, and the
cities of the nations fell: and great Babylon came in remembrance
before God, to give unto her the cup of the wine of the fierceness of
his wrath.
===================================================================
INTERNATIONAL 07.11.2005 Monday - ISTANBUL 17:35
French Report: Bosnians were Blindly Sacrificed
By Ali Ihsan Aydin
Published: Monday July 11, 2005
zaman.com
A research report prepared by the French national assembly that was
accused by The Netherlands for underestimating the massacre committed
in Srebrenica in 1995 brings to light some prominent points regarding
the event.
Since, the incidents that occurred are beyond mental capacity, the
French Assembly Research Commission tried to find answers to the
questions that did not leave the European conscious for 10 years, as
the French took some responsibility for the massacre in 2000: Why did
the Dutch soldiers who were responsible for Srebrenica not defend it?
Why did the French General, Bernard Janvier who was the commander of
the United Nations (UN) forces in Bosnia not begin an air attack even
though he was authorized to do so? Did France make a secret agreement
with the Serbians? Was gathering Bosnians to the UN-constructed
security areas part of the plan for the mass massacres? The commission
published the 1200-page report at the end of its research. The report
provides significant clues to understanding the barbarism in Srebrenica
during the nine months, but failed to give any definite answers for
many questions since the UN, North Atlantic Treaty Organizations (NATO)
and French Ministry of Defense were not approached for their
cooperation.
Dutch soldiers simplified the massacre by collecting the Bosnians'
weapons
The French report also indicated that Janvier cannot accept all the
blame and drew attention to the Dutch soldiers who were responsible for
protecting Srebrenica not to make any show of defense against the
Serbians. Determining that situation provided a great psychological
advantage for the Serbs, the commission noted that the Dutch soldiers
had seized the guns of Bosnians and surrendered them to the Serbians
thereby dispersing their weak defense system. The report also reminded
that the Dutch soldiers also floundered in Tuzla and criticized the
Dutch authorities for their witnessing of the massacre in Srebrenica
and then keeping it a secret.
One of the commanders from the international forces, British Commander
Rupert Smith, is also accused implicitly in the report. Reminding that
as Janvier's deputy the British officer, responsible for the links with
NATO took a vacation in the critical period, it is emphasized the fact
that FORPRONU officials' did not make any reactions during the crises
still remains as an important unanswered question. Reminding that Smith
had met with Mladic who undertook the massacre in Srebrenica twice on
15-19 July 1995, the commission informs that they wanted to ask him
directly about the content of the talks; however, Smith did not respond
to their request for a meeting. The French Commission report stresses
that the UN's Bosnian Envoy Yasushi Akashi presented reports to the UN
Security Council containing incorrect information.
Emphasizing the UN took action to "protect peace"' in the middle of the
war, the report informs that due to the "neutrality" of the officials,
they did not show even a single display of retaliation to the Serbians
who hindered the UN convoys. Claiming that although the international
force was in Bosnia "physically", it never had a 'military' existence
there, the commission underlines that the cause of the massacre should
be looked at as the unwillingness of French, British, and US
politicians to intervene.
Were Srebrenica and Zepa left to the Serbians as part of a peace
agreement?
French parliamentary members noted that the weakness of United Nations
(UN) is clearly seen in its policy for establishing "security zones"
and they emphasized the insufficient protection in these areas where
Bosnians had been gathered up. The reasons behind the Srebrenica
genocide should be looked at from this perspective, they claimed. The
commission said in the report's conclusion: "A shocking question, but
not asking it will be even more shocking. Was Srebrenica the result of
a policy that aims t easing the negotiations in order to reshape the
Ethnic Map of Bosnia and Herzegovina? Was the city lost as a result of
a decision taken in Paris, London, Washington and even in Sarajevo?"
The report also noted thatsin order to figure this out one needs to
look at the maps of Bosnia and Herzegovina made before July 1995 and
after July 1995 and also the chronology of the events. The report
emphasizes from this perspective that the enemy brothers made an
agreement to share Bosnian territory only four months after the fall of
Srebrenica. The silence of Western leaders regarding the fall of Zepa,
another security zone, following the fall of Srebrenica despite claims
that Serbians were undertaking ethnic genocide in Srebrenica hardens
this thesis. The report by the French Parliament notes, there is not
enough evidence to claim that there is an international plan regarding
this issue.
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
