Guess that makes everyone "weasels" now, eh ?
"Those companies, with three U.S. citizens, were among those named in
a report released last week by U.S. weapons inspector Charles A.
Duelfer, who concluded that Iraq did not possess stockpiles of illicit
weapons immediately prior to the U.S.-led invasion. The lengthy report
also examined the oil-for-food program, and included names of
companies and individuals around the world that traded in Iraqi oil.
In most instances, however, the names of the U.S. companies and
citizens were expunged from the version of the report that was
released publicly. Officials said they did so because of privacy
laws."
Rest of report here
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25416-2004Oct11.html
"Between 1996 and 2003, U.S. companies and individuals joined those
from other countries in receiving vouchers allowing them to obtain oil
and to profit from selling or trading it. Together, U.S. companies and
individuals received vouchers for more than 100 million barrels of
oil."
--
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:qdnXc.152269$RY5.24085@news.easynews.com...
"On the other hand, I know I am
bunked and that you are debunked."
.
|
|
| User: " John F Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: What a surprise. US companies in Oil for Food Scandal too |
02 Nov 2004 07:24:12 AM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cm801g$9og$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
Guess that makes everyone "weasels" now, eh ?
"Those companies, with three U.S. citizens, were among those named in
a report released last week by U.S. weapons inspector Charles A.
Duelfer, who concluded that Iraq did not possess stockpiles of illicit
weapons immediately prior to the U.S.-led invasion. The lengthy report
also examined the oil-for-food program, and included names of
companies and individuals around the world that traded in Iraqi oil.
In most instances, however, the names of the U.S. companies and
citizens were expunged from the version of the report that was
released publicly. Officials said they did so because of privacy
laws."
Rest of report here
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25416-2004Oct11.html
"Between 1996 and 2003, U.S. companies and individuals joined those
from other countries in receiving vouchers allowing them to obtain oil
and to profit from selling or trading it. Together, U.S. companies and
individuals received vouchers for more than 100 million barrels of
oil."
Awwwww, will this mean Jean, MacDonald and others will no longer be able to
wallow in their dreamworlds?
It's all about money, honey. Blood for oil, blood for cash.
Like I said guys, it's only a matter of time.
--
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:qdnXc.152269$RY5.24085@news.easynews.com...
"On the other hand, I know I am
bunked and that you are debunked."
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: What a surprise. US companies in Oil for Food Scandal too |
02 Nov 2004 07:36:05 AM |
|
|
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message
news:Y5OdnZs5TJIFFxrcRVn-qw@locallink.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cm801g$9og$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
Guess that makes everyone "weasels" now, eh ?
"Those companies, with three U.S. citizens, were among those named in
a report released last week by U.S. weapons inspector Charles A.
Duelfer, who concluded that Iraq did not possess stockpiles of illicit
weapons immediately prior to the U.S.-led invasion. The lengthy report
also examined the oil-for-food program, and included names of
companies and individuals around the world that traded in Iraqi oil.
In most instances, however, the names of the U.S. companies and
citizens were expunged from the version of the report that was
released publicly. Officials said they did so because of privacy
laws."
Rest of report here
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25416-2004Oct11.html
"Between 1996 and 2003, U.S. companies and individuals joined those
from other countries in receiving vouchers allowing them to obtain oil
and to profit from selling or trading it. Together, U.S. companies and
individuals received vouchers for more than 100 million barrels of
oil."
Awwwww, will this mean Jean, MacDonald and others will no longer be able
to
wallow in their dreamworlds?
Oh I wouldn't worry about thenm, it's not as if reality has managed to
encroach on either of them to any discernable degree in the millions of
other subjects they've been proven wrong on, is it?
It's all about money, honey. Blood for oil, blood for cash.
Pretty much.. well natural resources generally maybe?
Like I said guys, it's only a matter of time.
--
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:qdnXc.152269$RY5.24085@news.easynews.com...
"On the other hand, I know I am
bunked and that you are debunked."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Lie Re: What a surprise. US companies in Oil for Food Scandal too |
02 Nov 2004 10:16:31 AM |
|
|
John F Lemke a écrit:
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cm801g$9og$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
Guess that makes everyone "weasels" now, eh ?
"Those companies, with three U.S. citizens, were among those named in
a report released last week by U.S. weapons inspector Charles A.
Duelfer, who concluded that Iraq did not possess stockpiles of illicit
weapons immediately prior to the U.S.-led invasion. The lengthy report
also examined the oil-for-food program, and included names of
companies and individuals around the world that traded in Iraqi oil.
In most instances, however, the names of the U.S. companies and
citizens were expunged from the version of the report that was
released publicly. Officials said they did so because of privacy
laws."
Rest of report here
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25416-2004Oct11.html
"Between 1996 and 2003, U.S. companies and individuals joined those
from other countries in receiving vouchers allowing them to obtain oil
and to profit from selling or trading it. Together, U.S. companies and
individuals received vouchers for more than 100 million barrels of
oil."
Awwwww, will this mean Jean, MacDonald and others will no longer be able to
wallow in their dreamworlds?
***** you *****, There is no dream world. The US didn't take kickbacks.
This was perfectly OK. The weasels who did are still the weasels. You
are too dumb to even have the intellectual capacity to read for
yourself? You take that piece of ***** tw word for cash?
Gee you are an imbecile.
The only ones who thwarted the programs are those who renege on their
signatures.
These are the weasels, and assholes like you two.
J.
It's all about money, honey. Blood for oil, blood for cash.
Like I said guys, it's only a matter of time.
--
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:qdnXc.152269$RY5.24085@news.easynews.com...
"On the other hand, I know I am
bunked and that you are debunked."
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Lie Re: What a surprise. US companies in Oil for Food Scandal too |
02 Nov 2004 10:36:38 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:zpOhd.3766360$ic1.378296@news.easynews.com...
John F Lemke a écrit:
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cm801g$9og$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
Guess that makes everyone "weasels" now, eh ?
"Those companies, with three U.S. citizens, were among those named in
a report released last week by U.S. weapons inspector Charles A.
Duelfer, who concluded that Iraq did not possess stockpiles of illicit
weapons immediately prior to the U.S.-led invasion. The lengthy report
also examined the oil-for-food program, and included names of
companies and individuals around the world that traded in Iraqi oil.
In most instances, however, the names of the U.S. companies and
citizens were expunged from the version of the report that was
released publicly. Officials said they did so because of privacy
laws."
Rest of report here
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25416-2004Oct11.html
"Between 1996 and 2003, U.S. companies and individuals joined those
from other countries in receiving vouchers allowing them to obtain oil
and to profit from selling or trading it. Together, U.S. companies and
individuals received vouchers for more than 100 million barrels of
oil."
Awwwww, will this mean Jean, MacDonald and others will no longer be able
to
wallow in their dreamworlds?
***** you *****, There is no dream world. The US didn't take kickbacks.
So why the subpoenas?
This was perfectly OK. The weasels who did are still the weasels. You
are too dumb to even have the intellectual capacity to read for
yourself? You take that piece of ***** tw word for cash?
I've been proven far more honest than you Jean. How many peopel agree with
your lieas about me again? It's a shame your ego caused you to fall out with
Dani too, but that's rather more your loss than hers..
Gee you are an imbecile.
The only ones who thwarted the programs are those who renege on their
signatures.
These are the weasels, and assholes like you two.
J.
It's all about money, honey. Blood for oil, blood for cash.
Like I said guys, it's only a matter of time.
--
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:qdnXc.152269$RY5.24085@news.easynews.com...
"On the other hand, I know I am
bunked and that you are debunked."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Lie. Re: What a surprise. US companies in Oil for Food Scandal too |
02 Nov 2004 10:14:49 AM |
|
|
tw a écrit:
Guess that makes everyone "weasels" now, eh ?
The fact is that Americans companmies merely bought opil, and never gave
any kickback to Saddam to make weapons, neither did they take money out
of the oil for food program.
The ones mentioned in the Dalfur report are those who did such a thing.
It is not surprising you would make up ***** buit the article doesn,t say
that they were in cahoots with anyone unlike what is proven the REAL
weasels were doing.
To dump the GUILT of the weasels on the honest participant just shows
that YOU are the lying weasels.
And the International weasels are still the weasels here.
Shows nothing else.
J.
"Those companies, with three U.S. citizens, were among those named in
a report released last week by U.S. weapons inspector Charles A.
Duelfer, who concluded that Iraq did not possess stockpiles of illicit
weapons immediately prior to the U.S.-led invasion. The lengthy report
also examined the oil-for-food program, and included names of
companies and individuals around the world that traded in Iraqi oil.
In most instances, however, the names of the U.S. companies and
citizens were expunged from the version of the report that was
released publicly. Officials said they did so because of privacy
laws."
Rest of report here
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25416-2004Oct11.html
"Between 1996 and 2003, U.S. companies and individuals joined those
from other countries in receiving vouchers allowing them to obtain oil
and to profit from selling or trading it. Together, U.S. companies and
individuals received vouchers for more than 100 million barrels of
oil."
--
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:qdnXc.152269$RY5.24085@news.easynews.com...
"On the other hand, I know I am
bunked and that you are debunked."
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Lie. Re: What a surprise. US companies in Oil for Food Scandal too |
02 Nov 2004 10:35:17 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:ZnOhd.4358507$6p.719820@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
Guess that makes everyone "weasels" now, eh ?
The fact is that Americans companmies merely bought opil, and never gave
any kickback to Saddam to make weapons, neither did they take money out
of the oil for food program.
Really? So whay are they being subpoenad as it stated in the article?
The ones mentioned in the Dalfur report are those who did such a thing.
"In most instances, however, the names of the U.S. companies and citizens
were expunged from the version of the report that was released publicly.
Officials said they did so because of privacy laws. "
It is not surprising you would make up ***** buit the article doesn,t say
that they were in cahoots with anyone unlike what is proven the REAL
weasels were doing.
See above. THere is obviously suspicion that they were, hence the subpoenas.
To dump the GUILT of the weasels on the honest participant just shows
that YOU are the lying weasels.
And the International weasels are still the weasels here.
Shows nothing else.
Ah shut up you senile old fool. You are debunked again.
J.
"Those companies, with three U.S. citizens, were among those named in
a report released last week by U.S. weapons inspector Charles A.
Duelfer, who concluded that Iraq did not possess stockpiles of illicit
weapons immediately prior to the U.S.-led invasion. The lengthy report
also examined the oil-for-food program, and included names of
companies and individuals around the world that traded in Iraqi oil.
In most instances, however, the names of the U.S. companies and
citizens were expunged from the version of the report that was
released publicly. Officials said they did so because of privacy
laws."
Rest of report here
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25416-2004Oct11.html
"Between 1996 and 2003, U.S. companies and individuals joined those
from other countries in receiving vouchers allowing them to obtain oil
and to profit from selling or trading it. Together, U.S. companies and
individuals received vouchers for more than 100 million barrels of
oil."
--
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:qdnXc.152269$RY5.24085@news.easynews.com...
"On the other hand, I know I am
bunked and that you are debunked."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Lie. Re: What a surprise. US companies in Oil for Food Scandaltoo |
02 Nov 2004 11:56:12 AM |
|
|
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:ZnOhd.4358507$6p.719820@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
Guess that makes everyone "weasels" now, eh ?
The fact is that Americans companies merely bought oil, and never gave
any kickback to Saddam to make weapons, neither did they take money out
of the oil for food program.
Really? So whay are they being subpoenad as it stated in the article?
To see how much oil the got for their vouchers. Nothing wrong with that.
Not like they were in cahoots with Saddam unlike the weasels from the SC.
The ones mentioned in the Dalfur report are those who did such a thing.
"In most instances, however, the names of the U.S. companies and citizens
were expunged from the version of the report that was released publicly.
Officials said they did so because of privacy laws. "
Sure, since they are not concerned by the fraud. Why expose them?
It is not surprising you would make up ***** but the article doesn't say
that they were in cahoots with anyone unlike what is proven the REAL
weasels were doing.
See above. THere is obviously suspicion that they were, hence the subpoenas.
*****,. Nowhere does it say that these concern any criminal
suspicion. It is merely part of the reconstitution and insure that it won't.
To dump the GUILT of the weasels on the honest participant just shows
that YOU are the lying weasels.
And the International weasels are still the weasels here.
Shows nothing else.
Ah shut up you senile old fool. You are debunked again.
First, I don't know who you are talking to since I am not senile.
Second, dream on loser, you are the one debunked here. And we know why.
J.
J.
"Those companies, with three U.S. citizens, were among those named in
a report released last week by U.S. weapons inspector Charles A.
Duelfer, who concluded that Iraq did not possess stockpiles of illicit
weapons immediately prior to the U.S.-led invasion. The lengthy report
also examined the oil-for-food program, and included names of
companies and individuals around the world that traded in Iraqi oil.
In most instances, however, the names of the U.S. companies and
citizens were expunged from the version of the report that was
released publicly. Officials said they did so because of privacy
laws."
Rest of report here
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25416-2004Oct11.html
"Between 1996 and 2003, U.S. companies and individuals joined those
from other countries in receiving vouchers allowing them to obtain oil
and to profit from selling or trading it. Together, U.S. companies and
individuals received vouchers for more than 100 million barrels of
oil."
--
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:qdnXc.152269$RY5.24085@news.easynews.com...
"On the other hand, I know I am
bunked and that you are debunked."
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Lie. Re: What a surprise. US companies in Oil for Food Scandal too |
03 Nov 2004 03:07:06 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:0TPhd.4362948$6p.720342@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:ZnOhd.4358507$6p.719820@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
Guess that makes everyone "weasels" now, eh ?
The fact is that Americans companies merely bought oil, and never gave
any kickback to Saddam to make weapons, neither did they take money out
of the oil for food program.
Really? So whay are they being subpoenad as it stated in the article?
To see how much oil the got for their vouchers. Nothing wrong with that.
Not like they were in cahoots with Saddam unlike the weasels from the
SC.
Unfounded assertion.
The ones mentioned in the Dalfur report are those who did such a thing.
"In most instances, however, the names of the U.S. companies and
citizens
were expunged from the version of the report that was released publicly.
Officials said they did so because of privacy laws. "
Sure, since they are not concerned by the fraud. Why expose them?
Unfounded assertion. If they were not inbvolved in fraud WHY were they in
teh Dalfur reprot? (remember: you sai "THe ones mentioned in the Dalfur
report are those who did such a thing" *snicker*)
It is not surprising you would make up ***** but the article doesn't say
that they were in cahoots with anyone unlike what is proven the REAL
weasels were doing.
See above. THere is obviously suspicion that they were, hence the
subpoenas.
*****,. Nowhere does it say that these concern any criminal
suspicion. It is merely part of the reconstitution and insure that it
won't.
To dump the GUILT of the weasels on the honest participant just shows
that YOU are the lying weasels.
And the International weasels are still the weasels here.
Shows nothing else.
Ah shut up you senile old fool. You are debunked again.
First, I don't know who you are talking to since I am not senile.
Senilty does that to you, old man
Second, dream on loser, you are the one debunked here. And we know why.
"We"?! LOL YOU mean you and your *****-drinking pal?
J.
J.
"Those companies, with three U.S. citizens, were among those named in
a report released last week by U.S. weapons inspector Charles A.
Duelfer, who concluded that Iraq did not possess stockpiles of illicit
weapons immediately prior to the U.S.-led invasion. The lengthy report
also examined the oil-for-food program, and included names of
companies and individuals around the world that traded in Iraqi oil.
In most instances, however, the names of the U.S. companies and
citizens were expunged from the version of the report that was
released publicly. Officials said they did so because of privacy
laws."
Rest of report here
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25416-2004Oct11.html
"Between 1996 and 2003, U.S. companies and individuals joined those
from other countries in receiving vouchers allowing them to obtain oil
and to profit from selling or trading it. Together, U.S. companies and
individuals received vouchers for more than 100 million barrels of
oil."
--
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:qdnXc.152269$RY5.24085@news.easynews.com...
"On the other hand, I know I am
bunked and that you are debunked."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Lie. Re: What a surprise. US companies in Oil for Food Scandaltoo |
05 Nov 2004 12:43:45 PM |
|
|
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:0TPhd.4362948$6p.720342@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:ZnOhd.4358507$6p.719820@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
Guess that makes everyone "weasels" now, eh ?
The fact is that Americans companies merely bought oil, and never gave
any kickback to Saddam to make weapons, neither did they take money out
of the oil for food program.
Really? So whay are they being subpoenad as it stated in the article?
To see how much oil the got for their vouchers. Nothing wrong with that.
Not like they were in cahoots with Saddam unlike the weasels from the
SC.
Unfounded assertion.
Yes it is founded, ht Dalfour reports demonstrates it.
The only one that is not proven guilty is Kofi, yet, and that is why he
upholds remaining documents.
The ones mentioned in the Dalfur report are those who did such a thing.
"In most instances, however, the names of the U.S. companies and
citizens
were expunged from the version of the report that was released publicly.
Officials said they did so because of privacy laws. "
Sure, since they are not concerned by the fraud. Why expose them?
Unfounded assertion. If they were not inbvolved in fraud WHY were they in
teh Dalfur reprot? (remember: you sai "THe ones mentioned in the Dalfur
report are those who did such a thing" *snicker*)
Yes, those the Dalfur reports demonstrates had fraudulent dwellings.
i'll bet you talk through your hat without having even read the report.
Tss tss. Typical of weasels...
It is not surprising you would make up ***** but the article doesn't say
that they were in cahoots with anyone unlike what is proven the REAL
weasels were doing.
See above. THere is obviously suspicion that they were, hence the
subpoenas.
*****,. Nowhere does it say that these concern any criminal
suspicion. It is merely part of the reconstitution and insure that it
won't.
To dump the GUILT of the weasels on the honest participant just shows
that YOU are the lying weasels.
And the International weasels are still the weasels here.
Shows nothing else.
Ah shut up you senile old fool. You are debunked again.
First, I don't know who you are talking to since I am not senile.
Senilty does that to you, old man
Bah, Maybe it does that to you. And I am not old, I am much younger
than, say, Bush, who himself is much younger than Kerry, say.
Anyway, given that you are such a braindead idiot that you base your lie
just on the impression that I am somewhat older than a young punk like
you, who is too juvenile as this remark shows to know *****, it may be
something else than senility. A brain tumor maybe?
Second, dream on loser, you are the one debunked here. And we know why.
"We"?! LOL YOU mean you and your *****-drinking pal?
There is no ***** drinker on apn. You know very well that AK made that
***** up. You just repeat it even of you had it debunked. It must be your
brain tumor.
J.
J.
J.
"Those companies, with three U.S. citizens, were among those named in
a report released last week by U.S. weapons inspector Charles A.
Duelfer, who concluded that Iraq did not possess stockpiles of illicit
weapons immediately prior to the U.S.-led invasion. The lengthy report
also examined the oil-for-food program, and included names of
companies and individuals around the world that traded in Iraqi oil.
In most instances, however, the names of the U.S. companies and
citizens were expunged from the version of the report that was
released publicly. Officials said they did so because of privacy
laws."
Rest of report here
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25416-2004Oct11.html
"Between 1996 and 2003, U.S. companies and individuals joined those
from other countries in receiving vouchers allowing them to obtain oil
and to profit from selling or trading it. Together, U.S. companies and
individuals received vouchers for more than 100 million barrels of
oil."
--
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:qdnXc.152269$RY5.24085@news.easynews.com...
"On the other hand, I know I am
bunked and that you are debunked."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
