What are Bush and Cheney hiding?



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > What are Bush and Cheney hiding?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: ""
Date: 02 May 2004 06:13:13 AM
Object: What are Bush and Cheney hiding?
Bush and Cheney testify in secret
By Andrew Buncombe in Washington
30 April 2004
Behind closed doors and without even a recording being made of what
they said, President George Bush and his deputy ***** Cheney were
questioned yesterday by the 11 September commission about the
administration's failure to prevent the al-Qa'ida attacks.
Before the private session began, the American public had been unsure
about the extent to which Mr Bush and his officials were warned about
the threat of Osama bin Laden's terror network; afterwards, they were
barely better informed. The only concession to the historical record
agreed by the White House was to allow two staff members of the
commission to take written notes.
Mr Bush had never wanted to face the commission he set up to
investigate the circumstances of the attacks. The administration
eventually agreed that he and Mr Cheney would appear together, neither
under oath, in a single, closed-door session with the 10 commission
members in the Oval Office of the White House.
That was hailed as a breakthrough by the commission but, in exchange
for that concession, its chairman had to agree that Mr Bush, Mr Cheney
and no other senior officials would face further questioning. After
the three-hour session Mr Bush told reporters: "I'm glad I did it;
it's important."
Asked if had been advised by his lawyer not to answer any specific
questions from the commissioners, he added: "I answered every question
they asked ... It's probably best I not go into the details of the
questions and let them incorporate [that] into their report ... If we
had anything to hide we would not have met them." The testimony of Mr
Bush and Mr Cheney has gripped Washington, with critics claiming the
President is trying to protect himself from scrutiny.
His defenders say presidents rarely testify in such circumstances and
the former president Bill Clinton - also under scrutiny for what he
did and not do to tackle the threat from al-Qa'ida - also spoke to the
commission in private.
"This is a good opportunity for the President to sit down with members
of the commission and talk with them about the seriousness with which
we took the threat from al-Qa'ida, the steps we were taking to
confront it, and how we have been responding to the attacks of 11
September," Mr Bush's spokesman, Scott McClellan, said.
The commissioners arrived at the White House at about 9.15am and
gathered for photographs around Mr Bush and Mr Cheney. Alberto
Gonzales, a senior White House lawyer and two unidentified members of
his staff were also present. The session began at 9.30am.
There was much for the commission members to ask. Timothy Roemer, a
former Indiana Congressman and one of five Democrats on the
commission, said he would ask Mr Bush about the contents of an
intelligence briefing entitled "Bin Laden determined to strike in US"
that was given to him on 6 August, 2001, and what he did with that
information. "Why wasn't [the threat level] higher, given the threat
levels in spring and summer [of] 2001?" he said.
Some relatives of those killed in the attacks on New York and
Washington said they were looking for answers. "The purpose is not to
lay blame but to assess possible reforms," said Kristen Breitweiser,
from New Jersey, whose husband, Ronald, was killed.
The White House has been thrown on the defensive by claims that it did
not take seriously warnings about the growing threat from al-Qa'ida in
the spring and summer of 2001. Richard Clarke, Mr Bush's former
counter-terrorism chief, and FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds say
warnings were ignored.
2 May 2004 07:07





.

 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER