Turn on the TV and take a look at the
Palestinians rioting around Arafat's
coffin.
You expect Israel to deal rationally
with these Savages?
Tony
.
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
28 Nov 2004 08:39:21 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
Jane" < >
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041125093335.14229.00001139@mb-m13.aol.com...
"Jane"
wrote:
Hopefully, everyone will tire of this nonsense soon! I'm going to try to
ignore it. You should, too. We'll all be checking the headers, now.
Jane
But you do know that this place would be in an uproar had I done the same
to
Dani, right?
But little miss innocent can do no >>>wrong in the eyes of 90% of the
people
in this group, hell, she's even insulted >>>some of them and they love it.
Tony
True enough.
No it's not true.
Of course it's true.
I wouldn't let it bother you, though. >>Who cares what other
people think? I can't understand why >>anyone would wish to emulate
Grantland. he is lower than a snake.
Ahhh.. look who you're talking to, Jane. >The lowest possible "snake" to have
ever >posted to this group.
LOL!!!
This is just further proof that you hate you own nation, you see me as being
lower than those in this group who wish death upon our troops and failure upon
our nation.
Do you realize that the vast majority of >regulars here have kill-filed Tony?
So what? The "vast majority of the regulars" are anti-American bastards, Jane
can see this.
Including people that you respect like >Woods, Suzanne and Marvin. Does that
not tell you something about the type of >filth we're dealing with here?
You mean the people that befriend those that wish death upon our troops and
failure upon our nation?
Do you see an apn revolt against >Grantland?
Of course not, he hates America as much as most of the regulars in this group,
birds of a feather you know.
Grantland can be shocking and >outlandish to people who don't quite
understand him - but he's harmless; and >really is, believe it or not,
good deep down.
LOL!!! Here we go again, anyone who hates America is seen as "good" and
"funny" by twisted minds like you Dani.
Tony is a heartless, soulless ***** who >used to taunt Amy about her
husband's >*Cancer* - who has taunted me about my
*depression* .
ONLY IN RETAILATION YOU STUPID IDIOT. I did not start that sort of thing, it
was doen to me and my family first.
Grantland would never do either of those >things.. to anyone. Grantland is a
prankster and a jokester; but he has >heart.
LOL, and again we see that the Anti-American is seen as a generally good person
no matter what they say.
You supposedly had a brother in Iraq, many people in this group wished death
upon any American solider in Iraq (Chris and Grant included) yet you befriend
these people.
This just goes to show that you are the biggest lowlife scum to ever enter this
group, because you lied to the people here in a sick attempt to get some kind
of sympathy by saying your brother got killed in Iraq.
There is no way that you could befriend these people had your brother really
been killed in Iraq, so it was a big lie, a big lie devised to get sympathy for
yourself and to give you an excuse to spew your hatred toward our President.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
25 Nov 2004 08:34:11 AM |
|
|
In article <dd3256f0.0411242038.2599d5c6@posting.google.com>, (Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
Michael Johnathan McDonald's <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<mf5aq0947lve7l6ng0mghqfffbemc59uku@4ax.com>...
Don't try to play the friendship just having fun rout, because we
never were friends. ;)
So I will take this as abuse :-)
Tony
Your right agains Tony ;) yazzz is always right ;) Tinnie-Winnie and
Kriby-baby and they're terrorist lover boyfriend AK are always fuckin
with ya ;) The mutha fuckas ;) Suey and Dani are ignoring yazzz ;)
They know youre the big man, T ;) Don't worry, I'm here to protect
ya ;) yazzz has to be the coolest guy here ;)
I just loves ya, Tones ;)
Mikey ;)
<dani7200@hotmail.com> Hey Kook. Do you now like libeling people by
impersonating their name on USENET? Do you know you look here more
stupid than most here ever had? Why? Only one with a direct header (
long time account) has ever impersonated my name and used it against
me. Now you are number two.
Have a nice weekend & thanksgiving. Try to think about it. You are in
a small class by yourself now. Your only other friend, that I can
think of at the moment in context here, in that class is a REAL
terrorist supporter who said he loves Usama bin Laden.
So a real terrorist supporter and you stooped to such a low-life trash
position. Two peas in a pod.
It's not "libel" (look up that term). Secondly, there was no attempt to
impersonate you or hide anything, all she did was change her nickname and mimic
your posts. It's called parody.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
24 Nov 2004 10:56:30 PM |
|
|
On 24 Nov 2004 20:38:28 -0800, (Michael
Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
Michael Johnathan McDonald's <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<mf5aq0947lve7l6ng0mghqfffbemc59uku@4ax.com>...
Don't try to play the friendship just having fun rout, because we
never were friends. ;)
So I will take this as abuse :-)
lol!
Tony
Your right agains Tony ;) yazzz is always right ;) Tinnie-Winnie and
Kriby-baby and they're terrorist lover boyfriend AK are always fuckin
with ya ;) The mutha fuckas ;) Suey and Dani are ignoring yazzz ;)
They know youre the big man, T ;) Don't worry, I'm here to protect
ya ;) yazzz has to be the coolest guy here ;)
I just loves ya, Tones ;)
Mikey ;)
<dani7200@hotmail.com> Hey Kook. Do you now like libeling people by
impersonating their name on USENET? Do you know you look here more
stupid than most here ever had? Why? Only one with a direct header (
long time account) has ever impersonated my name and used it against
me. Now you are number two.
Have a nice weekend & thanksgiving. Try to think about it. You are in
a small class by yourself now. Your only other friend, that I can
think of at the moment in context here, in that class is a REAL
terrorist supporter who said he loves Usama bin Laden.
So a real terrorist supporter and you stooped to such a low-life trash
position. Two peas in a pod.
LOL! Lighten up. Go ahead and imitate me ya freak. I would probably
think it was funny and laugh. Christ you are paranoid. Check the
damn headers, weirdo. Obviously it's me and I wasn't trying to hide
anything. You have no sense of humor.
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: What does Dani look like? dani7200@hotmail.com |
24 Nov 2004 10:20:06 PM |
|
|
Original header post by long time poster Dani (dani7200@hotmail.com)
Michael Johnathan McDonald's <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<mf5aq0947lve7l6ng0mghqfffbemc59uku@4ax.com>...
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=mf5aq0947lve7l6ng0mghqfffbemc59uku%404ax.com&output=gplain
From: Michael Johnathan McDonald's <dani7200@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Subject: Re: What do Savages look like?
Message-ID: <mf5aq0947lve7l6ng0mghqfffbemc59uku@4ax.com>
References: <dd3256f0.0411221548.c5b8fde@posting.google.com>
<20041124022939.21699.00000966@mb-m12.aol.com>
<RU1pd.45087$Le1.927696@news20.bellglobal.com>
<41a4aff1.61938743@ct-news.iafrica.com>
<jhk9q0prv5kgikrcccn8f7p7f8mpj0m4gs@4ax.com>
<41a4eebe.78016231@ct-news.iafrica.com>
<e7s9q0dldv8jhjpp0254g576jgmot8i5ne@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 89
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.30.123.155
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: attbi_s03 1101338604 66.30.123.155 (Wed, 24 Nov 2004 23:23:24
GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 23:23:24 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 23:23:25 GMT
Tony
Your right agains Tony ;) yazzz is always right ;) Tinnie-Winnie and
Kriby-baby and they're terrorist lover boyfriend AK are always fuckin
with ya ;) The mutha fuckas ;) Suey and Dani are ignoring yazzz ;)
They know youre the big man, T ;) Don't worry, I'm here to protect
ya ;) yazzz has to be the coolest guy here ;)
I just loves ya, Tones ;)
Mikey ;)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: What does Dani look like? dani7200@hotmail.com |
25 Nov 2004 08:32:17 AM |
|
|
In article <dd3256f0.0411242020.1cf982bc@posting.google.com>, (Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
Original header post by long time poster Dani (dani7200@hotmail.com)
Michael Johnathan McDonald's <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<mf5aq0947lve7l6ng0mghqfffbemc59uku@4ax.com>...
Why are you bothering to go through all this - it's included in the posts. We
all can see it's Dani goofing around. Get a grip!
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: What does Dani look like? dani7200@hotmail.com |
24 Nov 2004 10:26:03 PM |
|
|
On 24 Nov 2004 20:20:06 -0800, (Michael
Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
Original header post by long time poster Dani (dani7200@hotmail.com)
Michael Johnathan McDonald's <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<mf5aq0947lve7l6ng0mghqfffbemc59uku@4ax.com>...
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=mf5aq0947lve7l6ng0mghqfffbemc59uku%404ax.com&output=gplain
From: Michael Johnathan McDonald's <dani7200@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Subject: Re: What do Savages look like?
Message-ID: <mf5aq0947lve7l6ng0mghqfffbemc59uku@4ax.com>
References: <dd3256f0.0411221548.c5b8fde@posting.google.com>
<20041124022939.21699.00000966@mb-m12.aol.com>
<RU1pd.45087$Le1.927696@news20.bellglobal.com>
<41a4aff1.61938743@ct-news.iafrica.com>
<jhk9q0prv5kgikrcccn8f7p7f8mpj0m4gs@4ax.com>
<41a4eebe.78016231@ct-news.iafrica.com>
<e7s9q0dldv8jhjpp0254g576jgmot8i5ne@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 89
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.30.123.155
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: attbi_s03 1101338604 66.30.123.155 (Wed, 24 Nov 2004 23:23:24
GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 23:23:24 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 23:23:25 GMT
Tony
Your right agains Tony ;) yazzz is always right ;) Tinnie-Winnie and
Kriby-baby and they're terrorist lover boyfriend AK are always fuckin
with ya ;) The mutha fuckas ;) Suey and Dani are ignoring yazzz ;)
They know youre the big man, T ;) Don't worry, I'm here to protect
ya ;) yazzz has to be the coolest guy here ;)
I just loves ya, Tones ;)
Mikey ;)
LOL!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: What does Dani look like? dani7200@hotmail.com |
24 Nov 2004 11:22:13 PM |
|
|
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 24 Nov 2004 20:20:06 -0800, (Michael
Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
Your right agains Tony ;) yazzz is always right ;) Tinnie-Winnie and
Kriby-baby and they're terrorist lover boyfriend AK are always fuckin
with ya ;) The mutha fuckas ;) Suey and Dani are ignoring yazzz ;)
They know youre the big man, T ;) Don't worry, I'm here to protect
ya ;) yazzz has to be the coolest guy here ;)
I just loves ya, Tones ;)
Mikey ;)
LOL!
Hahhhahahahaha! Mikeys cabbage brain just turned to mush. pfff
G
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: What does Dani look like? dani7200@hotmail.com |
25 Nov 2004 12:55:36 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 05:22:13 GMT, (Grantland)
wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 24 Nov 2004 20:20:06 -0800, (Michael
Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
Your right agains Tony ;) yazzz is always right ;) Tinnie-Winnie and
Kriby-baby and they're terrorist lover boyfriend AK are always fuckin
with ya ;) The mutha fuckas ;) Suey and Dani are ignoring yazzz ;)
They know youre the big man, T ;) Don't worry, I'm here to protect
ya ;) yazzz has to be the coolest guy here ;)
I just loves ya, Tones ;)
Mikey ;)
LOL!
Hahhhahahahaha! Mikeys cabbage brain just turned to mush. pfff
It's so sad that he's actually mentioned Libel. LOL!
I'm obviously not hiding that it's me. Tony's case on the sex group
is clearly different.. well to anyone who isn't biased. Or retarded.
Either or.
Dani
G
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: What does Dani look like? dani7200@hotmail.com |
25 Nov 2004 08:29:24 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
It's so sad that he's actually mentioned Libel. LOL!
I'm obviously not hiding that it's me. >Tony's case on the sex group
is clearly different.. well to anyone who >isn't biased. Or retarded.
Either or.
Dani
Prove it, liar.
I see that despite all your denials, you just can't get me out of your mind,
funny isn't it?
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
21 Nov 2004 07:57:40 AM |
|
|
bollogs@hotmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20041119100734.06574.00000837@mb-m15.aol.com>...
"Jane"
wrote:
bollogs" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote
The savages are the fuckin' yankie >>idiots who shoot unarmed and
injured freedom fighters in the head >>when they are down!
So now you are openly rooting for the Terrorists again? You did a little
flip
flop last year, tried to say you weren't, now you're back out in the open
about
it.
No , I'm not rooting for the terrorists, I'm >rooting for the Iraqi's!I'm
against this >terrorist invasion of Iraq.
That's funny, the Iraqi government and it's Army are fighting with us against
elements of Saddam's forces as well as foreign Terrorists.
Yes I see that once again you side with the Terrorists, but this is expected
from you.
Why don't you tell us all once again >>how you wished for the death of all
American forces that set foot inside of >>Iraq?
They deserve resistance and that's what
you yanks are getting.
Come on Coward, are you wishing death on American forces again? Or are you
engaging in double speak so as not too offend some of your supporters?
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "bollogs" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
22 Nov 2004 04:45:35 AM |
|
|
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20041121085740.08086.00001018@mb-m05.aol.com>...
bollogs@hotmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20041119100734.06574.00000837@mb-m15.aol.com>...
"Jane"
wrote:
bollogs" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote
The savages are the fuckin' yankie >>idiots who shoot unarmed and
injured freedom fighters in the head >>when they are down!
So now you are openly rooting for the Terrorists again? You did a little
flip
flop last year, tried to say you weren't, now you're back out in the open
about
it.
No , I'm not rooting for the terrorists, I'm >rooting for the Iraqi's!I'm
against this >terrorist invasion of Iraq.
That's funny, the Iraqi government and it's Army are fighting with us against
elements of Saddam's forces as well as foreign Terrorists.
The "Iraqi Government"? What Iraqi government pantyboy? Oh you mean
those puppets that the yankies put in there of course.
Yes I see that once again you side with the Terrorists, but this is expected
from you.
Terrorists? What terrorists pantyboy? Oh you mean the people fighting
against the vermin who invaded their country of course!
Why don't you tell us all once again >>how you wished for the death of all
American forces that set foot inside of >>Iraq?
They deserve resistance and that's what
you yanks are getting.
Come on Coward, are you wishing death on American forces again? Or are you
engaging in double speak so as not too offend some of your supporters?
Coward? How am I a coward? Is that because I don't like your yankie
arrogance? Face it pantyboy, I'm not sitting in front of a pc
supporting my troops instead of volunteering to go and fight alongside
them...that would be you. Wouldn't it?
WH
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
22 Nov 2004 08:29:02 AM |
|
|
bollogs@hotmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20041121085740.08086.00001018@mb-m05.aol.com>...
bollogs@hotmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20041119100734.06574.00000837@mb-m15.aol.com>...
"Jane"
wrote:
bollogs" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote
The savages are the fuckin' yankie >>idiots who shoot unarmed and
injured freedom fighters in the head >>when they are down!
So now you are openly rooting for the Terrorists again? You did a little
flip
flop last year, tried to say you weren't, now you're back out in the
open
about
it.
No , I'm not rooting for the terrorists, I'm >rooting for the Iraqi's!I'm
against this >terrorist invasion of Iraq.
That's funny, the Iraqi government and it's Army are fighting with us
against
elements of Saddam's forces as well >>as foreign Terrorists.
The "Iraqi Government"? What Iraqi >government pantyboy? Oh you mean
those puppets that the yankies put in >there of course.
You'll be saying the same thing after the January 30th elections.
The truth is, you won't be happy unless Iraq is back under a dictator who hates
the USA.
Yes I see that once again you side with >>the Terrorists, but this is
expected from >>you.
Terrorists? What terrorists pantyboy? Oh >you mean the people fighting against
the >vermin who invaded their country of >course!
I mean the remnants of those loyal to Saddam and Al Qaida elements, you know,
your friends.
Why don't you tell us all once again >>>>how you wished for the death of
all American forces that set foot >>>>inside Iraq.
They deserve resistance and that's >>>what you yanks are getting.
Come on Coward, are you wishing >>death on American forces again? Or are
you engaging in double speak so as not >>too offend some of your supporters?
Coward? How am I a coward?
WH
You're a coward because you are wishing for the death of American forces as you
have said in the past; but now you mince your words out of fear, that's why
you're a coward.
Be a man and speak your mind Chris.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
22 Nov 2004 08:23:25 PM |
|
|
In article <a666e2c5.0411220245.3dc0844a@posting.google.com>, (bollogs) wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20041121085740.08086.00001018@mb-m05.aol.com>...
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20041119100734.06574.00000837@mb-m15.aol.com>...
"Jane"
wrote:
bollogs" < > wrote
The savages are the fuckin' yankie >>idiots who shoot unarmed and
injured freedom fighters in the head >>when they are down!
So now you are openly rooting for the Terrorists again? You did a little
flip
flop last year, tried to say you weren't, now you're back out in the open
about
it.
No , I'm not rooting for the terrorists, I'm >rooting for the Iraqi's!I'm
against this >terrorist invasion of Iraq.
That's funny, the Iraqi government and it's Army are fighting with us against
elements of Saddam's forces as well as foreign Terrorists.
The "Iraqi Government"? What Iraqi government pantyboy? Oh you mean
those puppets that the yankies put in there of course.
You're wasting your time. With Tony, it's "Oh, but that's *different* from
puppet governments that other countries put into power!" The US can never do
anything remotely wrong or corrupt ... unless there's a Democrat in the White
House, of course!
9_9
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tadapope" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
24 Nov 2004 01:28:07 AM |
|
|
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/Graphics/Party.Pug.JPEG
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
Oh Joy!
Tom
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
18 Nov 2004 02:16:27 AM |
|
|
If it is proven that would make:
USA war crimes 1
Islamist killers war crimes 10000
And guess whose camp will punish the one who made war crimes.
Well, the math may be a bit more about the Muslim terrorists but you get
the picture.
J.
bollogs a écrit:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20041112084137.21753.00000386@mb-m12.aol.com>...
Turn on the TV and take a look at the
Palestinians rioting around Arafat's
coffin.
You expect Israel to deal rationally
with these Savages?
Tony
Savages?
The savages are the fuckin' yankie idiots who shoot unarmed and
injured freedom fighters in the head when they are down!
Brave savages at that! Brave yankie savages. Hopefully the ***** who
did it will go to jail for the rest of his life for war crimes...which
is what it was A WAR CRIME!
WH
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "droctane" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
12 Nov 2004 05:42:42 PM |
|
|
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20041112084137.21753.00000386@mb-m12.aol.com>...
Turn on the TV and take a look at the
Palestinians rioting around Arafat's
coffin.
You expect Israel to deal rationally
with these Savages?
It reminds me of those dipshit American sports fans who are prone to
riot after a big game, maybe we should bomb them like those Savages.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
13 Nov 2004 11:31:38 PM |
|
|
TonyZ wrote:
Turn on the TV and take a look at the
Palestinians rioting around Arafat's
coffin.
Yeah....lol.....reminds me of the "Cabbage Patch Doll" craze back in the
80's when the store opened in the morning.
Those old ladies would have killed I believe.
It also reminds me of what happened in Mass. after the big game a few
weeks ago only the Palestinians were less brutal.
You expect Israel to deal rationally
with these Savages?
No......I expect they'll deal the same way they have been all along.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
12 Nov 2004 09:26:24 PM |
|
|
In article <20041112084137.21753.00000386@mb-m12.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Turn on the TV and take a look at the
Palestinians rioting around Arafat's
coffin.
You expect Israel to deal rationally
with these Savages?
"Savages"? I don't think any educated person in the West has used that term to
describe another culture since the 19th century - it's a term the ignorant use
nowadays.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
14 Nov 2004 02:50:56 PM |
|
|
(Woodswun) wrote in message news:<A9fld.2524$zk7.154@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <20041112084137.21753.00000386@mb-m12.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Turn on the TV and take a look at the
Palestinians rioting around Arafat's
coffin.
You expect Israel to deal rationally
with these Savages?
"Savages"? I don't think any educated person in the West has used that term to
describe another culture since the 19th century - it's a term the ignorant use
nowadays.
Hey tw, how do you feel about that?
[tw has routinely used the term "savages" to describe religious people]
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
15 Nov 2004 01:23:15 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411141250.48c18096@posting.google.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote in message
news:<A9fld.2524$zk7.154@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <20041112084137.21753.00000386@mb-m12.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Turn on the TV and take a look at the
Palestinians rioting around Arafat's
coffin.
You expect Israel to deal rationally
with these Savages?
"Savages"? I don't think any educated person in the West has used that
term to
describe another culture since the 19th century - it's a term the
ignorant use
nowadays.
Hey tw, how do you feel about that?
[tw has routinely used the term "savages" to describe religious people]
"Routinely"? Lying again are you Steve? Seeing as it was religious people
who originally coined the term "savages" in the first place, I find it
amusingly ironic on many levels.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
15 Nov 2004 08:51:37 AM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cn9la8$8pk$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411141250.48c18096@posting.google.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote in message
news:<A9fld.2524$zk7.154@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <20041112084137.21753.00000386@mb-m12.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Turn on the TV and take a look at the
Palestinians rioting around Arafat's
coffin.
You expect Israel to deal rationally
with these Savages?
"Savages"? I don't think any educated person in the West has used that
term to
describe another culture since the 19th century - it's a term the
ignorant use
nowadays.
Hey tw, how do you feel about that?
[tw has routinely used the term "savages" to describe religious people]
"Routinely"? Lying again are you Steve? Seeing as it was religious people
who originally coined the term "savages" in the first place, I find it
amusingly ironic on many levels.
I would agree that "routinely" is fairly accurate!
Jane
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
15 Nov 2004 09:10:45 AM |
|
|
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tn3md.11853$Ho4.511342@news20.bellglobal.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cn9la8$8pk$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411141250.48c18096@posting.google.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote in message
news:<A9fld.2524$zk7.154@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <20041112084137.21753.00000386@mb-m12.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Turn on the TV and take a look at the
Palestinians rioting around Arafat's
coffin.
You expect Israel to deal rationally
with these Savages?
"Savages"? I don't think any educated person in the West has used
that
term to
describe another culture since the 19th century - it's a term the
ignorant use
nowadays.
Hey tw, how do you feel about that?
[tw has routinely used the term "savages" to describe religious
people]
"Routinely"? Lying again are you Steve? Seeing as it was religious
people
who originally coined the term "savages" in the first place, I find it
amusingly ironic on many levels.
I would agree that "routinely" is fairly accurate!
Well.. back it up with some numbers then, or a might call you on it.
Look up how many times I mention religion, look up how many times I mention
"savages". Should only take a couple of minutes..the second part of my
statement still stands
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
15 Nov 2004 10:03:02 PM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news: <cnagmr$o44$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tn3md.11853$Ho4.511342@news20.bellglobal.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cn9la8$8pk$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411141250.48c18096@posting.google.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote in message
news:<A9fld.2524$zk7.154@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <20041112084137.21753.00000386@mb-m12.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Turn on the TV and take a look at the
Palestinians rioting around Arafat's
coffin.
You expect Israel to deal rationally
with these Savages?
"Savages"? I don't think any educated person in the West has used
that
term to
describe another culture since the 19th century - it's a term the
ignorant use
nowadays.
Hey tw, how do you feel about that?
[tw has routinely used the term "savages" to describe religious
people]
"Routinely"? Lying again are you Steve? Seeing as it was religious
people
who originally coined the term "savages" in the first place, I find it
amusingly ironic on many levels.
I would agree that "routinely" is fairly accurate!
Well.. back it up with some numbers then, or a might call you on it.
Look up how many times I mention religion, look up how many times I mention
"savages". Should only take a couple of minutes..the second part of my
statement still stands
Noting that I carefully wrote "has routinely" ... I found several
references during a period of time earlier this year when you DID
routinely use the term ...
30 April 2004
"superstitious savage" ...
6 May 2004
"my little superstitious savage" ...
12 May 2004
"ignorant superstitious savage" ...
12 May 2004
"lying superstitious savage" ...
12 May 2004
"and I ***** on your filty christ" ... (no savage in there, but just
wanted to demonstrate the way you show such great respect and
admiration for another culture ... you hypocrite you) ...
13 May 2004
"superstitious savage neanderthals" ...
17 May 2004
"ignorant superstitious lying savage" ...
19 May 2004
"Oh cliff, another superstitious savage" ...
27 May 2004
"superstitious lying savage" ...
9 June 2004
"superstitious savage lunatic" ... (showing your inclusion of all
religions in your routine use of the term, this one was aimed at a
Muslim) ...
14 June 2004
"BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Superstitious savage" ...
17 June 2004
"How appropriate that I called you a superstitious savage before" ...
5 July 2004
"Bunch of superstitious nonsense from a backwards savage" ...
26 July 2004
"ignorant little savage" ...
After this, you seem to have stopped using the term. But for a period
of time (as I pointed out by writing "has routinely") you DID
routinely use the term. So ... how DO you feel about what Woods wrote
(repeating the question I asked, which you ignored)?
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
16 Nov 2004 01:49:43 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411152003.6c2c64bb@posting.google.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:
<cnagmr$o44$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tn3md.11853$Ho4.511342@news20.bellglobal.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cn9la8$8pk$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411141250.48c18096@posting.google.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote in message
news:<A9fld.2524$zk7.154@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <20041112084137.21753.00000386@mb-m12.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Turn on the TV and take a look at the
Palestinians rioting around Arafat's
coffin.
You expect Israel to deal rationally
with these Savages?
"Savages"? I don't think any educated person in the West has
used
that
term to
describe another culture since the 19th century - it's a term
the
ignorant use
nowadays.
Hey tw, how do you feel about that?
[tw has routinely used the term "savages" to describe religious
people]
"Routinely"? Lying again are you Steve? Seeing as it was religious
people
who originally coined the term "savages" in the first place, I find
it
amusingly ironic on many levels.
I would agree that "routinely" is fairly accurate!
Well.. back it up with some numbers then, or a might call you on it.
Look up how many times I mention religion, look up how many times I
mention
"savages". Should only take a couple of minutes..the second part of my
statement still stands
Noting that I carefully wrote "has routinely" ... I found several
references during a period of time earlier this year when you DID
routinely use the term ...
30 April 2004
"superstitious savage" ...
6 May 2004
"my little superstitious savage" ...
12 May 2004
"ignorant superstitious savage" ...
12 May 2004
"lying superstitious savage" ...
12 May 2004
"and I ***** on your filty christ" ... (no savage in there, but just
wanted to demonstrate the way you show such great respect and
admiration for another culture ... you hypocrite you) ...
13 May 2004
"superstitious savage neanderthals" ...
17 May 2004
"ignorant superstitious lying savage" ...
19 May 2004
"Oh cliff, another superstitious savage" ...
27 May 2004
"superstitious lying savage" ...
9 June 2004
"superstitious savage lunatic" ... (showing your inclusion of all
religions in your routine use of the term, this one was aimed at a
Muslim) ...
14 June 2004
"BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Superstitious savage" ...
17 June 2004
"How appropriate that I called you a superstitious savage before" ...
5 July 2004
"Bunch of superstitious nonsense from a backwards savage" ...
26 July 2004
"ignorant little savage" ...
After this, you seem to have stopped using the term. But for a period
of time (as I pointed out by writing "has routinely") you DID
routinely use the term. So ... how DO you feel about what Woods wrote
(repeating the question I asked, which you ignored)?
Already told you Stevie, can't you read?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
18 Nov 2004 12:11:20 AM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news: <cnf28u$47h$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411162150.7445b091@posting.google.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:
<cnd78d$70o$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gWomd.23321$Ho4.819435@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411152003.6c2c64bb@posting.google.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:
<cnagmr$o44$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tn3md.11853$Ho4.511342@news20.bellglobal.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cn9la8$8pk$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411141250.48c18096@posting.google.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote in message
news:<A9fld.2524$zk7.154@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <20041112084137.21753.00000386@mb-m12.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Turn on the TV and take a look at the
Palestinians rioting around Arafat's
coffin.
You expect Israel to deal rationally
with these Savages?
"Savages"? I don't think any educated person in the West
has used that term to describe another culture since the
19th century - it's a term the ignorant use nowadays.
Hey tw, how do you feel about that?
[tw has routinely used the term "savages" to describe
religious people]
"Routinely"? Lying again are you Steve? Seeing as it was
religious people who originally coined the term "savages"
in the first place, I find it amusingly ironic on many
levels.
I would agree that "routinely" is fairly accurate!
Well.. back it up with some numbers then, or a might call you on
it.
Look up how many times I mention religion, look up how many times
I
mention "savages". Should only take a couple of minutes..the
second
part of my statement still stands
Noting that I carefully wrote "has routinely" ... I found several
references during a period of time earlier this year when you DID
routinely use the term ...
30 April 2004
"superstitious savage" ...
6 May 2004
"my little superstitious savage" ...
12 May 2004
"ignorant superstitious savage" ...
12 May 2004
"lying superstitious savage" ...
12 May 2004
"and I ***** on your filty christ" ... (no savage in there, but just
wanted to demonstrate the way you show such great respect and
admiration for another culture ... you hypocrite you) ...
13 May 2004
"superstitious savage neanderthals" ...
17 May 2004
"ignorant superstitious lying savage" ...
19 May 2004
"Oh cliff, another superstitious savage" ...
27 May 2004
"superstitious lying savage" ...
9 June 2004
"superstitious savage lunatic" ... (showing your inclusion of all
religions in your routine use of the term, this one was aimed at a
Muslim) ...
14 June 2004
"BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Superstitious savage" ...
17 June 2004
"How appropriate that I called you a superstitious savage before"
...
5 July 2004
"Bunch of superstitious nonsense from a backwards savage" ...
26 July 2004
"ignorant little savage" ...
After this, you seem to have stopped using the term. But for a
period of time (as I pointed out by writing "has routinely") you
DID routinely use the term. So ... how DO you feel about what
Woods wrote (repeating the question I asked, which you ignored)?
Thank you for looking them up! :-) I remember him using "savage"
frequently!
The word was "routinely" .
So you're ready to acknowledge "routinely" -- okay, that's good --
even while I think Jane's use of "frequently" is perfectly appropriate
for the time period involved (as shown above), I'm more than happy to
accept your acknowledgment of "routinely."
I think you'll find I've mentioned religion a lot more times not in
conjunctino with superstitious savagery.Point being, if you look at
every time I used that term, it was in response to some fuckwit
claiming x,y,or z was going to happen due to prophecy,
Oh, now religious people (people of faith) are "fuckwits."
Nope, I treat peopel on a case by case basis,, If they display their
superstitous savageness, I call them on it. Why not quote the posts I
replied to as well Stevei?
Why not stick to the original point, which is your use of the term
"savage" -- or "savageness," as you just did in the paragraph above.
You think it is your job to "call them on it" for simply expressing
beliefs that differ from your own. And what that makes you is a
pompous, arrogant bigot.
Yes, your *tolerance* for a culture that is different from your own just
gives you such a grand superiority over other less tolerant people --
you HYPOCRITE you.
Calm down Stevie, you'll hose your shorts. Which culture did I dismiss as a
whole as savage?
With your case by case treatment of multiple people who share the same
belief, you have openly implied your disdain for religious culture.
What don't you stop dancing around the issue and just admit it?
aor that person x,y, or z had less right to life due to their beliefs.
Now, I must admit, that does sound like something that comes right out
of the Quran.
Ohh the irony..
What's the irony? I stated a fact, not an opinion, about the Quran.
But then I judge *people* by their actions, while you judge them by
their beliefs -- and you are a bigot for believing people are "savage"
for daring to share a belief that differs from your own.
At no point did I deem an entire race, ethnic or social group as
savages..
Actually, you did just that in this post.
Where?
Since you keep making brand new bigoted remarks with each new post,
they're everywhere.
Your implication that
"fuckwits" who believe in prophecies of the Bible are "savage" paints
an entire social group with a very broad brush.
There is a "social group" that can be identified by their shared belief in
Bible prophecy?! Wow! What are these people called?
Religious people.
It is obvious to
everyone who reads your posts how you feel about people of faith --
Argument by assertion noted. People can have whatever daft faith they like,
I don't care.
Apparently you do care, or you wouldn't have written all those
"superstitious savage" remarks (see above).
why don't you just admit it? Or is it too difficult to acknowledge (to
yourself) that you might actually be a close-minded bigot?
What is wrong with calling peopel who base their life on superstitions
superstitious?
I thought you didn't care? Of course you care. It bothers the hell out
of you. And your response has been to engage in bigoted name calling.
You hypocrite you (read the 2nd post in this thread), you hypocrite
you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
18 Nov 2004 02:12:00 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411172211.649165c4@posting.google.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:
<cnf28u$47h$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411162150.7445b091@posting.google.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:
<cnd78d$70o$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gWomd.23321$Ho4.819435@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411152003.6c2c64bb@posting.google.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:
<cnagmr$o44$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tn3md.11853$Ho4.511342@news20.bellglobal.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cn9la8$8pk$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411141250.48c18096@posting.google.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote in message
news:<A9fld.2524$zk7.154@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article
<20041112084137.21753.00000386@mb-m12.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Turn on the TV and take a look at the
Palestinians rioting around Arafat's
coffin.
You expect Israel to deal rationally
with these Savages?
"Savages"? I don't think any educated person in the
West
has used that term to describe another culture since
the
19th century - it's a term the ignorant use nowadays.
Hey tw, how do you feel about that?
[tw has routinely used the term "savages" to describe
religious people]
"Routinely"? Lying again are you Steve? Seeing as it was
religious people who originally coined the term "savages"
in the first place, I find it amusingly ironic on many
levels.
I would agree that "routinely" is fairly accurate!
Well.. back it up with some numbers then, or a might call you
on
it.
Look up how many times I mention religion, look up how many
times
I
mention "savages". Should only take a couple of minutes..the
second
part of my statement still stands
Noting that I carefully wrote "has routinely" ... I found
several
references during a period of time earlier this year when you
DID
routinely use the term ...
30 April 2004
"superstitious savage" ...
6 May 2004
"my little superstitious savage" ...
12 May 2004
"ignorant superstitious savage" ...
12 May 2004
"lying superstitious savage" ...
12 May 2004
"and I ***** on your filty christ" ... (no savage in there, but
just
wanted to demonstrate the way you show such great respect and
admiration for another culture ... you hypocrite you) ...
13 May 2004
"superstitious savage neanderthals" ...
17 May 2004
"ignorant superstitious lying savage" ...
19 May 2004
"Oh cliff, another superstitious savage" ...
27 May 2004
"superstitious lying savage" ...
9 June 2004
"superstitious savage lunatic" ... (showing your inclusion of
all
religions in your routine use of the term, this one was aimed at
a
Muslim) ...
14 June 2004
"BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Superstitious savage" ...
17 June 2004
"How appropriate that I called you a superstitious savage
before"
...
5 July 2004
"Bunch of superstitious nonsense from a backwards savage" ...
26 July 2004
"ignorant little savage" ...
After this, you seem to have stopped using the term. But for a
period of time (as I pointed out by writing "has routinely") you
DID routinely use the term. So ... how DO you feel about what
Woods wrote (repeating the question I asked, which you ignored)?
Thank you for looking them up! :-) I remember him using "savage"
frequently!
The word was "routinely" .
So you're ready to acknowledge "routinely" -- okay, that's good --
even while I think Jane's use of "frequently" is perfectly appropriate
for the time period involved (as shown above), I'm more than happy to
accept your acknowledgment of "routinely."
I think you'll find I've mentioned religion a lot more times not in
conjunctino with superstitious savagery.Point being, if you look at
every time I used that term, it was in response to some fuckwit
claiming x,y,or z was going to happen due to prophecy,
Oh, now religious people (people of faith) are "fuckwits."
Nope, I treat peopel on a case by case basis,, If they display their
superstitous savageness, I call them on it. Why not quote the posts I
replied to as well Stevei?
Why not stick to the original point, which is your use of the term
"savage" -- or "savageness," as you just did in the paragraph above.
Nope, taht's not the piont. IOf ou think Tony witnessing how other cultures
express grief and labelling them all savages is the same as em replying to a
few religious loons and calling them savages (why not quote the posts I
replied to?) THen you have integrity problems ona TonyZ scale.
You think it is your job to "call them on it" for simply expressing
beliefs that differ from your own. And what that makes you is a
pompous, arrogant bigot.
Ah blow it out your hole you silly little man.
Yes, your *tolerance* for a culture that is different from your own
just
gives you such a grand superiority over other less tolerant people --
you HYPOCRITE you.
Calm down Stevie, you'll hose your shorts. Which culture did I dismiss
as a
whole as savage?
With your case by case treatment of multiple people who share the same
belief, you have openly implied your disdain for religious culture.
What don't you stop dancing around the issue and just admit it?
Why not quote the posts I replied to?
aor that person x,y, or z had less right to life due to their
beliefs.
Now, I must admit, that does sound like something that comes right out
of the Quran.
Ohh the irony..
What's the irony? I stated a fact, not an opinion, about the Quran.
But then I judge *people* by their actions, while you judge them by
their beliefs -- and you are a bigot for believing people are "savage"
for daring to share a belief that differs from your own.
I don't believe people are savage for "daring to share a belief different to
my own".
At no point did I deem an entire race, ethnic or social group as
savages..
Actually, you did just that in this post.
Where?
Since you keep making brand new bigoted remarks with each new post,
they're everywhere.
Well it shoud be easy to find one where I deem an entire race, social or
ethnic group as "savage" then Stevie. Kind of telling that you haven't done
so...
Your implication that
"fuckwits" who believe in prophecies of the Bible are "savage" paints
an entire social group with a very broad brush.
There is a "social group" that can be identified by their shared belief
in
Bible prophecy?! Wow! What are these people called?
Religious people.
I know plenty of religious people who don't believe in Bible prophecy, you
superstitious twat.
It is obvious to
everyone who reads your posts how you feel about people of faith --
Argument by assertion noted. People can have whatever daft faith they
like,
I don't care.
Apparently you do care, or you wouldn't have written all those
"superstitious savage" remarks (see above).
Why not quote the posts I repsonded to?
why don't you just admit it? Or is it too difficult to acknowledge (to
yourself) that you might actually be a close-minded bigot?
What is wrong with calling peopel who base their life on superstitions
superstitious?
I thought you didn't care? Of course you care. It bothers the hell out
of you.
Oops.. Stevies off on another shorts-hoser! Assume away Stevie...
And your response has been to engage in bigoted name calling.
Why not quote the posts I responded to?
You hypocrite you (read the 2nd post in this thread), you hypocrite
you.
Dry yourself off Stevie...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
18 Nov 2004 11:48:06 PM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news: <cnhl9k$dgr$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411172211.649165c4@posting.google.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:
<cnf28u$47h$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411162150.7445b091@posting.google.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:
<cnd78d$70o$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gWomd.23321$Ho4.819435@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411152003.6c2c64bb@posting.google.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:
<cnagmr$o44$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tn3md.11853$Ho4.511342@news20.bellglobal.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cn9la8$8pk$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411141250.48c18096@posting.google.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote in message
news:<A9fld.2524$zk7.154@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article
<20041112084137.21753.00000386@mb-m12.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Turn on the TV and take a look at the
Palestinians rioting around Arafat's
coffin.
You expect Israel to deal rationally
with these Savages?
"Savages"? I don't think any educated person in the
West
has used that term to describe another culture since
the
19th century - it's a term the ignorant use nowadays.
Hey tw, how do you feel about that?
[tw has routinely used the term "savages" to describe
religious people]
"Routinely"? Lying again are you Steve? Seeing as it was
religious people who originally coined the term "savages"
in the first place, I find it amusingly ironic on many
levels.
I would agree that "routinely" is fairly accurate!
Well.. back it up with some numbers then, or a might call you
on
it.
Look up how many times I mention religion, look up how many
times
I
mention "savages". Should only take a couple of minutes..the
second
part of my statement still stands
Noting that I carefully wrote "has routinely" ... I found
several
references during a period of time earlier this year when you
DID
routinely use the term ...
30 April 2004
"superstitious savage" ...
6 May 2004
"my little superstitious savage" ...
12 May 2004
"ignorant superstitious savage" ...
12 May 2004
"lying superstitious savage" ...
12 May 2004
"and I ***** on your filty christ" ... (no savage in there, but
just
wanted to demonstrate the way you show such great respect and
admiration for another culture ... you hypocrite you) ...
13 May 2004
"superstitious savage neanderthals" ...
17 May 2004
"ignorant superstitious lying savage" ...
19 May 2004
"Oh cliff, another superstitious savage" ...
27 May 2004
"superstitious lying savage" ...
9 June 2004
"superstitious savage lunatic" ... (showing your inclusion of
all
religions in your routine use of the term, this one was aimed at
a
Muslim) ...
14 June 2004
"BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Superstitious savage" ...
17 June 2004
"How appropriate that I called you a superstitious savage
before"
...
5 July 2004
"Bunch of superstitious nonsense from a backwards savage" ...
26 July 2004
"ignorant little savage" ...
After this, you seem to have stopped using the term. But for a
period of time (as I pointed out by writing "has routinely") you
DID routinely use the term. So ... how DO you feel about what
Woods wrote (repeating the question I asked, which you ignored)?
Thank you for looking them up! :-) I remember him using "savage"
frequently!
The word was "routinely" .
So you're ready to acknowledge "routinely" -- okay, that's good --
even while I think Jane's use of "frequently" is perfectly appropriate
for the time period involved (as shown above), I'm more than happy to
accept your acknowledgment of "routinely."
I think you'll find I've mentioned religion a lot more times not in
conjunctino with superstitious savagery.Point being, if you look at
every time I used that term, it was in response to some fuckwit
claiming x,y,or z was going to happen due to prophecy,
Oh, now religious people (people of faith) are "fuckwits."
Nope, I treat peopel on a case by case basis,, If they display their
superstitous savageness, I call them on it. Why not quote the posts I
replied to as well Stevei?
Why not stick to the original point, which is your use of the term
"savage" -- or "savageness," as you just did in the paragraph above.
Nope, taht's not the piont. IOf ou think Tony witnessing how other cultures
express grief and labelling them all savages is the same as em replying to a
few religious loons and calling them savages (why not quote the posts I
replied to?) THen you have integrity problems ona TonyZ scale.
Now, in your judgement, they're religious "loons" for daring to share
beliefs that differ from your own. Thanks for proving my point, Mr.
Bigot.
You think it is your job to "call them on it" for simply expressing
beliefs that differ from your own. And what that makes you is a
pompous, arrogant bigot.
Ah blow it out your hole you silly little man.
Ah, good answer ... when you've got nothing, throw around a little
bluff and bluster. That always works.
Yes, your *tolerance* for a culture that is different from your own
just
gives you such a grand superiority over other less tolerant people --
you HYPOCRITE you.
Calm down Stevie, you'll hose your shorts. Which culture did I dismiss
as a
whole as savage?
Well, let's find out ... how DO you feel about the millions upon
millions of people who believe in God? You don't really need to
answer, since I already know. For quite some time, you've made your
sneering opinions of those who believe quite clear for all to see.
With your case by case treatment of multiple people who share the same
belief, you have openly implied your disdain for religious culture.
What don't you stop dancing around the issue and just admit it?
Why not quote the posts I replied to?
Why? If it's so important to you to have them posted, why don't you
post them? I already know what those posts said. I wrote one of them.
aor that person x,y, or z had less right to life due to their
beliefs.
Now, I must admit, that does sound like something that comes right out
of the Quran.
Ohh the irony..
What's the irony? I stated a fact, not an opinion, about the Quran.
But then I judge *people* by their actions, while you judge them by
their beliefs -- and you are a bigot for believing people are "savage"
for daring to share a belief that differs from your own.
I don't believe people are savage for "daring to share a belief different to
my own".
What??? Obviously you do -- why else would you have posted all those
responses labeling people "superstitous savage?" The only possible
answer is that they believe something you don't, and you don't like
what they believe.
At no point did I deem an entire race, ethnic or social group as
savages..
Actually, you did just that in this post.
Where?
Since you keep making brand new bigoted remarks with each new post,
they're everywhere.
Well it shoud be easy to find one where I deem an entire race, social or
ethnic group as "savage" then Stevie. Kind of telling that you haven't done
so...
I have numerous times ... by the way, how DO you feel about all the
millions upon millions of people who believe in God and believe in the
prophecies of the Old Testament? Or the New Testament?
Your implication that
"fuckwits" who believe in prophecies of the Bible are "savage" paints
an entire social group with a very broad brush.
There is a "social group" that can be identified by their shared belief
in
Bible prophecy?! Wow! What are these people called?
Religious people.
I know plenty of religious people who don't believe in Bible prophecy, you
superstitious twat.
Fine, then let's focus on the millions upon millions of people who DO
believe in Bible prophecy. They represent a culture that you have
routinely mocked and derided. How DO you feel about all those millions
of people?
It is obvious to
everyone who reads your posts how you feel about people of faith --
Argument by assertion noted. People can have whatever daft faith they
like,
I don't care.
Apparently you do care, or you wouldn't have written all those
"superstitious savage" remarks (see above).
Why not quote the posts I repsonded to?
I'll quote mine -- I was having a friendly conversation with another
poster when you jumped in and said of me:
"Oh cliff, another superstitious savage." And what had I said to draw
that unsolicited comment from you? I had told the other poster that
before Jesus returns (as HE promised HE would in the Bible), there are
still things that must happen first. That's it. And for that, I'm a
superstitious savage. And you're a pompous arrogant bigot.
why don't you just admit it? Or is it too difficult to acknowledge (to
yourself) that you might actually be a close-minded bigot?
What is wrong with calling peopel who base their life on superstitions
superstitious?
I thought you didn't care? Of course you care. It bothers the hell out
of you.
Oops.. Stevies off on another shorts-hoser! Assume away Stevie...
Why else would you jump in on certain conversations that don't involve
you to call other posters superstitious savages? If it TRULY did not
bother you, you'd either appreciate a culture that differs from your
own -- or at the very least, you'd simply ignore them. No, you've got
to sneer and deride and name call, because they are bothering you. Why
don't you just admit it, Mr. Bigot?
And your response has been to engage in bigoted name calling.
Why not quote the posts I responded to?
Such a weak attempt to deflect the argument away from your own
shortcomings. I was expecting some really slick debating techniques
from you, far more slick than this.
You hypocrite you (read the 2nd post in this thread), you hypocrite
you.
Dry yourself off Stevie...
Are you finished? You seem to have run out of anything relevant ... of
course, since you've been shown to be the bigot and hypocrite that you
are, I suppose it's understandable that you're left with nothing
relevant to say ...
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: What do Savages look like? |
19 Nov 2004 03:11:06 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411182148.1cc99cb6@posting.google.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:
<cnhl9k$dgr$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411172211.649165c4@posting.google.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:
<cnf28u$47h$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2b35e99.0411162150.7445b091@posting.google.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:
<snip>
Nope, I treat peopel on a case by case basis,, If they display their
superstitous savageness, I call them on it. Why not quote the posts
I
replied to as well Stevei?
Why not stick to the original point, which is your use of the term
"savage" -- or "savageness," as you just did in the paragraph above.
Nope, taht's not the piont. IOf ou think Tony witnessing how other
cultures
express grief and labelling them all savages is the same as em replying
to a
few religious loons and calling them savages (why not quote the posts I
replied to?) THen you have integrity problems ona TonyZ scale.
Now, in your judgement, they're religious "loons" for daring to share
beliefs that differ from your own.
Nope, I merely call loons loons, there are plenty of people who share
beliefs different from my own that I don't call loons.
Thanks for proving my point, Mr.
Bigot.
LOL! Argument by assertion is all you have isn't it Stevie?
You think it is your job to "call them on it" for simply expressing
beliefs that differ from your own. And what that makes you is a
pompous, arrogant bigot.
Ah blow it out your hole you silly little man.
Ah, good answer ... when you've got nothing, throw around a little
bluff and bluster. That always works.
If you don't like it, don't dish it out, son!
Calm down Stevie, you'll hose your shorts. Which culture did I
dismiss
as a
whole as savage?
Well, let's find out ... how DO you feel about the millions upon
millions of people who believe in God?
I feel they are superstitious. Same as I feel about people who believe in
ghosts, witches, fairies, hobgoblins, santa claus etc. Superstitous.
You don't really need to
answer, since I already know.
LOL! You arrogant tool
For quite some time, you've made your
sneering opinions of those who believe quite clear for all to see.
Assume away, Stevie..
With your case by case treatment of multiple people who share the same
belief, you have openly implied your disdain for religious culture.
What don't you stop dancing around the issue and just admit it?
Why not quote the posts I replied to?
Why? If it's so important to you to have them posted, why don't you
post them? I already know what those posts said. I wrote one of them.
Good, then you'll realise if you think Tony witnessing how other cultures
express grief and labelling them all savages is the same as me replying to a
few religious loons and calling them savages ,then you have integrity
problems ona TonyZ scale.
But this is all about you really isn't it? Yuo're just ticked off because
someone insulted your little fantasies aren't you?
Now, I must admit, that does sound like something that comes right
out
of the Quran.
Ohh the irony..
What's the irony? I stated a fact, not an opinion, about the Quran.
But then I judge *people* by their actions, while you judge them by
their beliefs -- and you are a bigot for believing people are "savage"
for daring to share a belief that differs from your own.
I don't believe people are savage for "daring to share a belief
different to
my own".
What??? Obviously you do
Argument by assertion - a classic example of the dogmatic ignorance
religion can breed.
-- why else would you have posted all those
responses labeling people "superstitous savage?"
Did I do that to EVERYONE who shares a belief different to my own? Of course
not. Stevie lies again!
The only possibleanswer is that they believe something you don't, and you
don't like
what they believe.
I don't CARE what they believe,
| | | | | | | | | | |
