.. and then said, those who oppose will be off to the gas chambers!!
What would you do? Would you obey, or do you prefer the gas chambers?
.
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: What if President Bush nuked Baghdad and Tehran Tomorrow? |
11 Apr 2007 01:24:54 PM |
|
|
"mukyuk" <a@b.com> wrote in message news:83ASh.48889$aG1.23413@pd7urf3no...
. and then said, those who oppose will be off to the gas chambers!!
What would you do? Would you obey, or do you prefer the gas chambers?
I thought this was going tobe such a hot topic, but it didn't pan!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rick" |
|
| Title: Re: What if President Bush nuked Baghdad and Tehran Tomorrow? |
11 Apr 2007 01:58:54 PM |
|
|
mukyuk wrote:
"mukyuk" <a@b.com> wrote in message news:83ASh.48889$aG1.23413@pd7urf3no...
. and then said, those who oppose will be off to the gas chambers!!
What would you do? Would you obey, or do you prefer the gas chambers?
I thought this was going tobe such a hot topic, but it didn't pan!
Well, for starters, what you got there, Mukyuk, is the Horns of a Moral
Dilemma.
You see, once the deed is done what good would protesting it do?
Now, If it were "I'm GOING to nuke Baghdad and Tehran tomorrow and any who
oppose it will be off to the gas chambers..." THEN one would have a choice.
Oppose and die.
Or "Whether it's nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of
OUTRAGEOUS fortune, or taking up arms against a Sea of Troubles and by
opposing thus end them ? "
But what if opposing does NOT end them?
Ah, there's the rub!! ;-)
Dead is dead, morally or otherwise....
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
