The invasion of Iraq was meant to be nothing more than 'securing' an 'Oil
Supplying Strong Hold', that the G. W. Bush Administration (after securing the
oil fields of Iraq), could then launch an attack against Syria and Saudi Arabia
(who where the TRUE 'Axis of Evil') based on C.I.A. findings.
The problem is, he didn't let the people of America know about his 'True Plan'
(and, it appears to be taking longer then he estimated). Can the people of
America 'LIVE' with this deception, and does the "American Public' support this
'deception ??? (And, think it is OK- ???)
This is the TRUE concerns being VOTED on in the next U.S. Presidential
Election.,(Don't let a few Debates side track your votes).
--
Just A Thought !!!
Wait, I'm receiving another transmission from the great beyond.
Wouldn't you know it,
it was a 'Wrong Number' :-(
.
|
|
| User: "Leigh_Bee" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
26 Oct 2004 05:19:14 PM |
|
|
"Kim M" <MILLER#K,2@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:<FtIed.1$rs5.61@news20.bellglobal.com>...
The invasion of Iraq was meant to be nothing more than 'securing' an 'Oil
Supplying Strong Hold', that the G. W. Bush Administration (after securing the
oil fields of Iraq), could then launch an attack against Syria and Saudi Arabia
(who where the TRUE 'Axis of Evil') based on C.I.A. findings.
The problem is, he didn't let the people of America know about his 'True Plan'
(and, it appears to be taking longer then he estimated). Can the people of
America 'LIVE' with this deception, and does the "American Public' support this
'deception ??? (And, think it is OK- ???)
This is the TRUE concerns being VOTED on in the next U.S. Presidential
Election.,(Don't let a few Debates side track your votes).
The problem though is the World is running out of Oil, is it
coincidence that the Bush dynasty is Oil based, or that being in the
oil business, means they would know ahead of the pack, where these
stress points would be, now positioning themselves to be in place when
the flood slows to a trickle.
Now the UN maybe the repository for mediating disputes but the Bush
admin has marginalsised the UN, and if not supported in a major way
will go the way of The League of Nations, and with far more reaching
results.
LB
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
27 Oct 2004 12:31:30 AM |
|
|
Leigh_Bee a écrit:
"Kim M" <MILLER#K,2@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:<FtIed.1$rs5.61@news20.bellglobal.com>...
The invasion of Iraq was meant to be nothing more than 'securing' an 'Oil
Supplying Strong Hold', that the G. W. Bush Administration (after securing the
oil fields of Iraq), could then launch an attack against Syria and Saudi Arabia
(who where the TRUE 'Axis of Evil') based on C.I.A. findings.
The problem is, he didn't let the people of America know about his 'True Plan'
(and, it appears to be taking longer then he estimated). Can the people of
America 'LIVE' with this deception, and does the "American Public' support this
'deception ??? (And, think it is OK- ???)
This is the TRUE concerns being VOTED on in the next U.S. Presidential
Election.,(Don't let a few Debates side track your votes).
The problem though is the World is running out of Oil, is it
coincidence that the Bush dynasty is Oil based, or that being in the
oil business, means they would know ahead of the pack, where these
stress points would be, now positioning themselves to be in place when
the flood slows to a trickle.
Now the UN maybe the repository for mediating disputes but the Bush
admin has marginalsised the UN,
The UN has marginalized itself.
and if not supported in a major way
And if the UN doesn't reconsider their stubbornness...
will go the way of The League of Nations, and with far more reaching
results.
LB
J.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
24 Oct 2004 03:50:56 PM |
|
|
"Kim M" <MILLER#K,2@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:<FtIed.1$rs5.61@news20.bellglobal.com>...
The invasion of Iraq was meant to be nothing more than 'securing' an 'Oil
Supplying Strong Hold', that the G. W. Bush Administration (after securing the
oil fields of Iraq), could then launch an attack against Syria and Saudi Arabia
(who where the TRUE 'Axis of Evil') based on C.I.A. findings.
So What? Have any proof that Bush took over the oil fields - I think
not. Nice try, please come again ;)
PS: I agree that Saudi is a big problem in supporting terror - but,
Bill Clinton sold them huge amounts of military equipment as part of
his '90s economic plan. You think Iraq is hard in a war, wait to we
battle these folks. ;)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
25 Oct 2004 12:06:11 AM |
|
|
*****. There was one conditional UN resolution that authorized force
in case of non-compliance, and it was never applied for 12 years.
The last chapter of this saga came with a last chance resolution.
All you or other say outside this inferring ulterior motives is total
bunk. Period.
J.
Kim M a écrit:
The invasion of Iraq was meant to be nothing more than 'securing' an 'Oil
Supplying Strong Hold', that the G. W. Bush Administration (after securing the
oil fields of Iraq), could then launch an attack against Syria and Saudi Arabia
(who where the TRUE 'Axis of Evil') based on C.I.A. findings.
The problem is, he didn't let the people of America know about his 'True Plan'
(and, it appears to be taking longer then he estimated). Can the people of
America 'LIVE' with this deception, and does the "American Public' support this
'deception ??? (And, think it is OK- ???)
This is the TRUE concerns being VOTED on in the next U.S. Presidential
Election.,(Don't let a few Debates side track your votes).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbarossa" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
25 Oct 2004 09:11:50 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> schreef in bericht
news:7R%ed.3287558$ic1.335766@news.easynews.com...
*****. There was one conditional UN resolution that authorized force
in case of non-compliance, and it was never applied for 12 years.
The last chapter of this saga came with a last chance resolution.
Resolution 1441 was never meant as a last chance resolution. It
was an inbetween resolution where the inspectors were ordered
back to Iraq to complete their work. Only after this work was
completed a new resolution was neccesary to lift the ceasefire
There was no ultimatum mentioned in that resolution.
All you or other say outside this inferring ulterior motives is total
bunk. Period
Strange huh? The first building the American soldiers seized was
the ministery of oil in Baghdad. The irony! While looters took all
the highly valuable stuff out of the museums and palaces and then
we are not too be even suspicious? Give me a break!
"I don't know where Osama Bin Laden is, I don't know whether he
is alive or dead, he is not important" - Bush about OBL.
He spoke the truth there folks! The future oilpipe from the Caspian
Sea to the Indian Ocean through Aghanistan is much more important
than OBL will ever be!
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
25 Oct 2004 10:32:21 AM |
|
|
Barbarossa a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> schreef in bericht
news:7R%ed.3287558$ic1.335766@news.easynews.com...
*****. There was one conditional UN resolution that authorized force
in case of non-compliance, and it was never applied for 12 years.
The last chapter of this saga came with a last chance resolution.
Resolution 1441 was never meant as a last chance resolution. It
Lie.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
25 Oct 2004 11:40:33 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:909fd.3898047$6p.650031@news.easynews.com...
Barbarossa a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> schreef in bericht
news:7R%ed.3287558$ic1.335766@news.easynews.com...
*****. There was one conditional UN resolution that authorized force
in case of non-compliance, and it was never applied for 12 years.
The last chapter of this saga came with a last chance resolution.
Resolution 1441 was never meant as a last chance resolution. It
Lie.
Then why did they give up trying to pass on final resolution ?? This final
one was to sanction armed intervention I thought .... if 1441 already
covered that aspect then what was the point of the final one?
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.776 / Virus Database: 523 - Release Date: 10/12/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
25 Oct 2004 01:45:52 PM |
|
|
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:909fd.3898047$6p.650031@news.easynews.com...
Barbarossa a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> schreef in bericht
news:7R%ed.3287558$ic1.335766@news.easynews.com...
*****. There was one conditional UN resolution that authorized force
in case of non-compliance, and it was never applied for 12 years.
The last chapter of this saga came with a last chance resolution.
Resolution 1441 was never meant as a last chance resolution. It
Lie.
Then why did they give up trying to pass on final resolution ?? This final
one was to sanction armed intervention I thought .... if 1441 already
covered that aspect then what was the point of the final one?
Because it WAS the final resolution. The only question was the harshness
of the sentence which they wanted to tone down, and which france
guaranteed to veto.
Still a few days ago Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz said:
http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2004/sp20041005-depsecdef0842.html
U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441 was his 17th—and supposed to be
his final—chance. Saddam Hussein chose defiance. He chose to continue
to hide his activities from inspectors. He chose to continue to support
terrorism.
Get a clue!
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
25 Oct 2004 02:10:07 PM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:ARbfd.3905829$6p.651038@news.easynews.com...
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:909fd.3898047$6p.650031@news.easynews.com...
Barbarossa a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> schreef in bericht
news:7R%ed.3287558$ic1.335766@news.easynews.com...
*****. There was one conditional UN resolution that authorized
force
in case of non-compliance, and it was never applied for 12 years.
The last chapter of this saga came with a last chance resolution.
Resolution 1441 was never meant as a last chance resolution. It
Lie.
Then why did they give up trying to pass on final resolution ?? This
final
one was to sanction armed intervention I thought .... if 1441 already
covered that aspect then what was the point of the final one?
Because it WAS the final resolution. The only question was the harshness
of the sentence which they wanted to tone down, and which france
guaranteed to veto.
Still a few days ago Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz said:
http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2004/sp20041005-depsecdef0842.html
U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441 was his 17th—and supposed to be
his final—chance. Saddam Hussein chose defiance. He chose to continue
to hide his activities from inspectors. He chose to continue to support
terrorism.
Get a clue!
J.
Did the US not try to get a resolution accepted or passed by the UNSC to
sanction an invasion? But they didn't bother because they knew that it would
be vetoed? Then Bush went ahead and invaded anyways without waiting for the
weapons inspectors to finish their work?
I do believe this to be true.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.776 / Virus Database: 523 - Release Date: 10/12/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
26 Oct 2004 12:06:07 AM |
|
|
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:ARbfd.3905829$6p.651038@news.easynews.com...
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:909fd.3898047$6p.650031@news.easynews.com...
Barbarossa a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> schreef in bericht
news:7R%ed.3287558$ic1.335766@news.easynews.com...
*****. There was one conditional UN resolution that authorized
force
in case of non-compliance, and it was never applied for 12 years.
The last chapter of this saga came with a last chance resolution.
Resolution 1441 was never meant as a last chance resolution. It
Lie.
Then why did they give up trying to pass on final resolution ?? This
final
one was to sanction armed intervention I thought .... if 1441 already
covered that aspect then what was the point of the final one?
Because it WAS the final resolution. The only question was the harshness
of the sentence which they wanted to tone down, and which france
guaranteed to veto.
Still a few days ago Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz said:
http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2004/sp20041005-depsecdef0842.html
U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441 was his 17th—and supposed to be
his final—chance. Saddam Hussein chose defiance. He chose to continue
to hide his activities from inspectors. He chose to continue to support
terrorism.
Get a clue!
J.
Did the US not try to get a resolution accepted or passed by the UNSC to
sanction an invasion?
NO.
You make me repeat. WHY? Can't get it the first time boy? Reread the
fucking post before asking stupid question... Ha well... Here it is again:
The only question was the harshness of the sentence which they wanted to
tone down, and which france guaranteed to veto.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kim M" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
27 Oct 2004 03:13:09 AM |
|
|
I (personally) do not see how this 'Resolution 1441' has anything to do with
what I am talking about here.
But if you feel it is something worth 'arguing about', then "Rock On" !!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbarossa" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
27 Oct 2004 05:53:21 AM |
|
|
"Kim M" <MILLER#K,2@sympatico.ca> schreef in bericht
news:1KIfd.7162$rs5.650371@news20.bellglobal.com...
I (personally) do not see how this 'Resolution 1441' has anything to do
with
what I am talking about here.
But if you feel it is something worth 'arguing about', then "Rock On" !!!
Resolution 1441 is very important and JG keeps lying about it. He thinks
that is was a final deadline, yet it wasn't. The inspectors were ordered
back
to Iraq to finish their work and to report further to the UNSC about the
progession. They made an inbetween report in March last year. Some
progession was reported. Most member of the UN SC then saw no reason
to invade Iraq. Yet the USA was already determined to invade Iraq even
far before resolution 1441. There are credible reports that say that Bush
wanted to invade just after he took office in 2000.
At the UNSC meeting in March last year the USA and UK sought a final
resolution with an ultmatum to Saddam Hussain. Russia, France and
China were not ready yet and it was highly likely that Russia and France
would veto such a resolution. The USA/UK sought to wage war on
Iraq legally, they soon found out that the other members of the UNSC
were not ready to go that far. They even wanted further inspections of
Hans Blix in Iraq. If the USA/UK would have filed a resolution it would
have been vetoed. Thus the USA/UK started the illegal way of invading
Iraq without a further UNSC resolution.
With the serious conseqences that any UNSC member can now intervene
anywhere in the world after interpreting UNSC resolution their way. The
USA/UK has breached the intentions of the UNSC and hijacked it.
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
27 Oct 2004 08:00:08 AM |
|
|
Barbarossa a écrit:
"Kim M" <MILLER#K,2@sympatico.ca> schreef in bericht
news:1KIfd.7162$rs5.650371@news20.bellglobal.com...
I (personally) do not see how this 'Resolution 1441' has anything to do
with
what I am talking about here.
But if you feel it is something worth 'arguing about', then "Rock On" !!!
Resolution 1441 is very important and JG keeps lying about it. He thinks
Nah, you lie by denying it.
I came across one link yesterday but there are thousands like that by
all officials if you care to look and anyone at the time knew it was the
last chance resolution if you look in reliable media, but YOU keep lying:
http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2004/sp20041005-depsecdef0842.html
Quote: "U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441 was his 17th—and supposed
to be his final—chance. Saddam Hussein chose defiance. He chose to
continue to hide his activities from inspectors. He chose to continue
to support terrorism. And he continued to torture his country and his
people in a way that puts him among the most brutal tyrants of the last
hundred years."
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
27 Oct 2004 10:43:39 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:sZMfd.3429383$ic1.349614@news.easynews.com...
Barbarossa a écrit:
"Kim M" <MILLER#K,2@sympatico.ca> schreef in bericht
news:1KIfd.7162$rs5.650371@news20.bellglobal.com...
I (personally) do not see how this 'Resolution 1441' has anything to do
with
what I am talking about here.
But if you feel it is something worth 'arguing about', then "Rock On"
!!!
Resolution 1441 is very important and JG keeps lying about it. He thinks
Nah, you lie by denying it.
I came across one link yesterday but there are thousands like that by
all officials if you care to look and anyone at the time knew it was the
last chance resolution if you look in reliable media, but YOU keep lying:
http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2004/sp20041005-depsecdef0842.html
Quote: "U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441 was his 17th—and supposed
to be his final—chance. Saddam Hussein chose defiance. He chose to
continue to hide his activities from inspectors. He chose to continue
to support terrorism. And he continued to torture his country and his
people in a way that puts him among the most brutal tyrants of the last
hundred years."
J.
Lies, lies and more lies.
The Facist Liar in meltdown again. Tsk tsk ...
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.776 / Virus Database: 523 - Release Date: 10/12/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
27 Oct 2004 12:01:40 PM |
|
|
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:sZMfd.3429383$ic1.349614@news.easynews.com...
Barbarossa a écrit:
"Kim M" <MILLER#K,2@sympatico.ca> schreef in bericht
news:1KIfd.7162$rs5.650371@news20.bellglobal.com...
I (personally) do not see how this 'Resolution 1441' has anything to do
with
what I am talking about here.
But if you feel it is something worth 'arguing about', then "Rock On"
!!!
Resolution 1441 is very important and JG keeps lying about it. He thinks
Nah, you lie by denying it.
I came across one link yesterday but there are thousands like that by
all officials if you care to look and anyone at the time knew it was the
last chance resolution if you look in reliable media, but YOU keep lying:
http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2004/sp20041005-depsecdef0842.html
Quote: "U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441 was his 17th—and supposed
to be his final—chance. Saddam Hussein chose defiance. He chose to
continue to hide his activities from inspectors. He chose to continue
to support terrorism. And he continued to torture his country and his
people in a way that puts him among the most brutal tyrants of the last
hundred years."
J.
Lies, lies and more lies.
Nah, this IS the truth.
Funny that all you can say is... nothing.
Another Facist Weasel in meltdown. Tsk tsk ...
Dream on, I debunk anti-semite assholes.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
27 Oct 2004 08:42:35 PM |
|
|
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<UvQfd.1934513$yk.320674@news.easynews.com>...
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:sZMfd.3429383$ic1.349614@news.easynews.com...
Barbarossa a écrit:
"Kim M" <MILLER#K,2@sympatico.ca> schreef in bericht
news:1KIfd.7162$rs5.650371@news20.bellglobal.com...
I (personally) do not see how this 'Resolution 1441' has anything to do
with
what I am talking about here.
But if you feel it is something worth 'arguing about', then "Rock On"
!!!
Resolution 1441 is very important and JG keeps lying about it. He thinks
Nah, you lie by denying it.
I came across one link yesterday but there are thousands like that by
all officials if you care to look and anyone at the time knew it was the
last chance resolution if you look in reliable media, but YOU keep lying:
http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2004/sp20041005-depsecdef0842.html
Quote: "U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441 was his 17th—and supposed
to be his final—chance. Saddam Hussein chose defiance. He chose to
continue to hide his activities from inspectors. He chose to continue
to support terrorism. And he continued to torture his country and his
people in a way that puts him among the most brutal tyrants of the last
hundred years."
J.
Lies, lies and more lies.
Nah, this IS the truth.
Isn't that the truth ;)
Funny that all you can say is... nothing.
In one ear and out the other ;)
Another Facist Weasel in meltdown. Tsk tsk ...
lol. S/he cannot even use the term correctly - that is how pathetic
s/he is;)
Heay Fucktard MTPA, you are the one supporting the terrorists here ;)
They [the terrorists] want the Jews dead and so does [did] the
'Fascist' in you too ;)
Just face the facts *****, ;) you are so pathetic that you cannot
even use correct terminology to describe your true self ;) That is
truly pathetic, just like ya.
Dream on, I debunk anti-semite assholes.
I have more names for the little *****, but I will leave her alone to
look in that mirror, once more, and see the only person that possibly
likes her? Oppps... there is one problem here, that person staring
back at her in the mirror dislikes her also ;) Ahh well back to the
drawing board for her. ;)
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
29 Oct 2004 04:30:03 AM |
|
|
On 27 Oct 2004 18:42:35 -0700, (Michael
Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<UvQfd.1934513$yk.320674@news.easynews.com>...
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:sZMfd.3429383$ic1.349614@news.easynews.com...
Barbarossa a écrit:
"Kim M" <MILLER#K,2@sympatico.ca> schreef in bericht
news:1KIfd.7162$rs5.650371@news20.bellglobal.com...
I (personally) do not see how this 'Resolution 1441' has anything to do
with
what I am talking about here.
But if you feel it is something worth 'arguing about', then "Rock On"
!!!
Resolution 1441 is very important and JG keeps lying about it. He thinks
Nah, you lie by denying it.
I came across one link yesterday but there are thousands like that by
all officials if you care to look and anyone at the time knew it was the
last chance resolution if you look in reliable media, but YOU keep lying:
http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2004/sp20041005-depsecdef0842.html
Quote: "U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441 was his 17th—and supposed
to be his final—chance. Saddam Hussein chose defiance. He chose to
continue to hide his activities from inspectors. He chose to continue
to support terrorism. And he continued to torture his country and his
people in a way that puts him among the most brutal tyrants of the last
hundred years."
J.
Lies, lies and more lies.
Nah, this IS the truth.
Isn't that the truth ;)
Funny that all you can say is... nothing.
In one ear and out the other ;)
Another Facist Weasel in meltdown. Tsk tsk ...
lol. S/he cannot even use the term correctly - that is how pathetic
s/he is;)
Heay Fucktard MTPA, you are the one supporting the terrorists here ;)
They [the terrorists] want the Jews dead and so does [did] the
'Fascist' in you too ;)
Just face the facts *****, ;) you are so pathetic that you cannot
even use correct terminology to describe your true self ;) That is
truly pathetic, just like ya.
Dream on, I debunk anti-semite assholes.
I have more names for the little *****, but I will leave her alone to
look in that mirror, once more, and see the only person that possibly
likes her? Oppps... there is one problem here, that person staring
back at her in the mirror dislikes her also ;) Ahh well back to the
drawing board for her. ;)
Hows the ***** tasting today, power ranger boy?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
29 Oct 2004 01:13:52 PM |
|
|
It seems that Cuan has a taste for lies and for excrement, he wallows in
them.
J.
Cuan a écrit:
On 27 Oct 2004 18:42:35 -0700, (Michael
Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<UvQfd.1934513$yk.320674@news.easynews.com>...
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:sZMfd.3429383$ic1.349614@news.easynews.com...
Barbarossa a écrit:
"Kim M" <MILLER#K,2@sympatico.ca> schreef in bericht
news:1KIfd.7162$rs5.650371@news20.bellglobal.com...
I (personally) do not see how this 'Resolution 1441' has anything to do
with
what I am talking about here.
But if you feel it is something worth 'arguing about', then "Rock On"
!!!
Resolution 1441 is very important and JG keeps lying about it. He thinks
Nah, you lie by denying it.
I came across one link yesterday but there are thousands like that by
all officials if you care to look and anyone at the time knew it was the
last chance resolution if you look in reliable media, but YOU keep lying:
http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2004/sp20041005-depsecdef0842.html
Quote: "U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441 was his 17th—and supposed
to be his final—chance. Saddam Hussein chose defiance. He chose to
continue to hide his activities from inspectors. He chose to continue
to support terrorism. And he continued to torture his country and his
people in a way that puts him among the most brutal tyrants of the last
hundred years."
J.
Lies, lies and more lies.
Nah, this IS the truth.
Isn't that the truth ;)
Funny that all you can say is... nothing.
In one ear and out the other ;)
Another Facist Weasel in meltdown. Tsk tsk ...
lol. S/he cannot even use the term correctly - that is how pathetic
s/he is;)
Heay Fucktard MTPA, you are the one supporting the terrorists here ;)
They [the terrorists] want the Jews dead and so does [did] the
'Fascist' in you too ;)
Just face the facts *****, ;) you are so pathetic that you cannot
even use correct terminology to describe your true self ;) That is
truly pathetic, just like ya.
Dream on, I debunk anti-semite assholes.
I have more names for the little *****, but I will leave her alone to
look in that mirror, once more, and see the only person that possibly
likes her? Oppps... there is one problem here, that person staring
back at her in the mirror dislikes her also ;) Ahh well back to the
drawing board for her. ;)
Hows the ***** tasting today, power ranger boy?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kim M" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
31 Oct 2004 01:23:01 AM |
|
|
As you all know by now, the control of WMDs was supposed to be a 'Major
Prerogative's to the G. W. Bush 'Admin Policy' for the invasion of Iraq; and as
the lack of concern for the a 'Sites of WMDs' seems to have been a 'none
concern' to the Bush Admin (as they cannot prove its location's prior to the
invasion [or validity of being there after the invasion]), it makes you wonder
if George W.Bush really cared???
--
Just A Thought !!!
Wait, I'm receiving another transmission from the great beyond.
Wouldn't you know it,
it was a 'Wrong Number' :-(
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
31 Oct 2004 08:39:31 AM |
|
|
Kim M a écrit:
As you all know by now, the control of WMDs was supposed to be a 'Major
Prerogative's to the G. W. Bush 'Admin Policy' for the invasion of Iraq; and as
the lack of concern for the a 'Sites of WMDs' seems to have been a 'none
concern' to the Bush Admin (as they cannot prove its location's prior to the
invasion [or validity of being there after the invasion]), it makes you wonder
if George W.Bush really cared???
What are you babbling about? This was checked first and deemed not to
contain WMDs.
Now they are looking into what happened before and afterwards.
There was indications that bunkers had been opened before and stuff
taken out under Saddam's watch.
After the invasion, this particular one had 250 tons of stuff removed
from it and blown out of it. This wasn't known until yesterday.
All the while the area was under coalition control BTW, and there is
little chance that after he invasion it was looted.
The remainder that had not been opened was open and checked a week
later, what happened then is under investigation.
The fact is that maybe it is not 360 tones but 100 tons that maybe wa
disposed of, it remains to be, and is being, assessed.
The fact is that they went on and secured 1000 times more stuff.
Anyway, WMDs? Not there!
J.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kim M" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
31 Oct 2004 01:57:33 AM |
|
|
This is the 'absolute' most that I can post on this as "I am facing absolute
exile" from this board as of "right now". The 'Spirit World' and 'Others' will
not allow me to say more!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
27 Oct 2004 07:57:12 AM |
|
|
The invasion of Iraq was ONLY to implement the serious consequences of
1441 the last chance resolution to comply with 687e after 12 years of
non-compliance.
Not for the lies you utter about the oil. Are you that dumb you can only
parrot what the weasels say?
Can you show me even one instance where the US will get oil for free, or
be given oil patch to exploit, or even get part of the profits?
YOU CAN'T because it is a lie.
The US and the coalition will still pay the same price as they always
have from OPEP for the oil, and they will have spend hundreds of
billions of dollars to free that people.
If that was true, you could tell me how they would get back 278 billions
(there is a 78 billions supplemental about to be requested), they will
have spent to help the Iraqis people, and I mean it has to be well over
that amount just to justify your lies.
How many billions per year, from where?
Explain your lies please.
J.
Kim M a écrit:
I (personally) do not see how this 'Resolution 1441' has anything to do with
what I am talking about here.
But if you feel it is something worth 'arguing about', then "Rock On" !!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
29 Oct 2004 04:14:12 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 05:06:11 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
*****. There was one conditional UN resolution that authorized force
in case of non-compliance, and it was never applied for 12 years.
The last chapter of this saga came with a last chance resolution.
All you or other say outside this inferring ulterior motives is total
bunk. Period.
*****, you frickin sack of horse *****. You're a stuck fucking
record. I'll make an appointment for you at Lemmings Anonymous. Be
there!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
29 Oct 2004 04:42:10 PM |
|
|
"Cuan" <an@nymous.co.za> wrote in message
news:ga24o01h1p28psbmu8r3i3nih5tahs2o5q@4ax.com...
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 05:06:11 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
*****. There was one conditional UN resolution that authorized force
in case of non-compliance, and it was never applied for 12 years.
The last chapter of this saga came with a last chance resolution.
All you or other say outside this inferring ulterior motives is total
bunk. Period.
*****, you frickin sack of horse *****. You're a stuck fucking
record. I'll make an appointment for you at Lemmings Anonymous. Be
there!
Yeah ... *sigh* ... I gave up replying to the idiot ... it goes on and on
....
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.784 / Virus Database: 530 - Release Date: 10/27/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
29 Oct 2004 05:33:54 PM |
|
|
Idiot replying to stupid.
J.
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Cuan" <an@nymous.co.za> wrote in message
news:ga24o01h1p28psbmu8r3i3nih5tahs2o5q@4ax.com...
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 05:06:11 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
*****. There was one conditional UN resolution that authorized force
in case of non-compliance, and it was never applied for 12 years.
The last chapter of this saga came with a last chance resolution.
All you or other say outside this inferring ulterior motives is total
bunk. Period.
*****, you frickin sack of horse *****. You're a stuck fucking
record. I'll make an appointment for you at Lemmings Anonymous. Be
there!
Yeah ... *sigh* ... I gave up replying to the idiot ... it goes on and on
...
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.784 / Virus Database: 530 - Release Date: 10/27/04
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
29 Oct 2004 01:12:50 PM |
|
|
Stepped in the pooh again, loser?
J.
Cuan a écrit:
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 05:06:11 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
*****. There was one conditional UN resolution that authorized force
in case of non-compliance, and it was never applied for 12 years.
The last chapter of this saga came with a last chance resolution.
All you or other say outside this inferring ulterior motives is total
bunk. Period.
*****, you frickin sack of horse *****. You're a stuck fucking
record. I'll make an appointment for you at Lemmings Anonymous. Be
there!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kim M" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
27 Oct 2004 02:51:04 AM |
|
|
This was 'Fulfilling' the Chaney / Rumsfeld 'Prophecies'.
"The Iraqi / Kuwait War was left 'un-resolved'... ".
Finding 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' was not a concern in this endeavour.
"Bring down Suddam" was the first objective (and Key objective), securing the
'Oil Fields' of Iraq was definitely the Secondary Priority (and a major reason
[or excuse] behind the attack on Iraq).
'Weapons of Mass Destruction' was a 'rouse' use to bring in 'naive' countries
like Spain, Australia and Britain in to this 'deceptive' plot.
All the time, a cover-up was instigated by the G. W. Bush Government who went to
great extent to 'quash' at the time, and any (later released) connections
between the 'Bin Ladan' family and possible 'Terrorist" attacks.
G. W. Bush may have been left in the dark about C.I.A. and FBI findings prior to
9/11 (but the latest 'inquiry' proved (beyond a 'shadow of a doubt') that the
C.I.A. and FBI where well aware of the possibilities of a U.S. attack using
American airplanes. Ms. Rice (possibly working on orders from above) told them
to "stop bothering the 'Admin' with un-substantiated information".
Future 'History' will prove this correct (although I risk U.S. sanctioning [and
possible 'Imprisonment' right now]), the future history will prove this
correct..
--
Just A Thought !!!
Wait, I'm receiving another transmission from the great beyond.
Wouldn't you know it,
it was a 'Wrong Number' :-(
"Kim M" <MILLER#K,2@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:FtIed.1$rs5.61@news20.bellglobal.com...
The invasion of Iraq was meant to be nothing more than 'securing' an 'Oil
Supplying Strong Hold', that the G. W. Bush Administration (after securing the
oil fields of Iraq), could then launch an attack against Syria and Saudi
Arabia
(who where the TRUE 'Axis of Evil') based on C.I.A. findings.
The problem is, he didn't let the people of America know about his 'True Plan'
(and, it appears to be taking longer then he estimated). Can the people of
America 'LIVE' with this deception, and does the "American Public' support
this
'deception ??? (And, think it is OK- ???)
This is the TRUE concerns being VOTED on in the next U.S. Presidential
Election.,(Don't let a few Debates side track your votes).
--
Just A Thought !!!
Wait, I'm receiving another transmission from the great beyond.
Wouldn't you know it,
it was a 'Wrong Number' :-(
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
27 Oct 2004 03:15:32 AM |
|
|
The only reason was implementing 1441. It was because he had breached it.
now indeed it entails finding out about the WMDs, but also punishing him
for supporting terrorism by paying homicide bombers, for considering
Kuwait still as his own (by refusing to give them back their POWs or
their national archives after 1441 - all conditions to avoid the lifting
of the cease fire Kuwait was the first mistake he made and brought this
upon himself). Saddam breached the resolution half a dozen ways besides
his WMDs cat and mouse game, which would have not yielded any result
even given 6 more months, and HAD it he would have restarted the
programs right after.
There was no other reason that the breach of his obligations.
J.
Kim M a écrit:
This was 'Fulfilling' the Chaney / Rumsfeld 'Prophecies'.
"The Iraqi / Kuwait War was left 'un-resolved'... ".
Finding 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' was not a concern in this endeavour.
"Bring down Suddam" was the first objective (and Key objective), securing the
'Oil Fields' of Iraq was definitely the Secondary Priority (and a major reason
[or excuse] behind the attack on Iraq).
'Weapons of Mass Destruction' was a 'rouse' use to bring in 'naive' countries
like Spain, Australia and Britain in to this 'deceptive' plot.
All the time, a cover-up was instigated by the G. W. Bush Government who went to
great extent to 'quash' at the time, and any (later released) connections
between the 'Bin Ladan' family and possible 'Terrorist" attacks.
G. W. Bush may have been left in the dark about C.I.A. and FBI findings prior to
9/11 (but the latest 'inquiry' proved (beyond a 'shadow of a doubt') that the
C.I.A. and FBI where well aware of the possibilities of a U.S. attack using
American airplanes. Ms. Rice (possibly working on orders from above) told them
to "stop bothering the 'Admin' with un-substantiated information".
Future 'History' will prove this correct (although I risk U.S. sanctioning [and
possible 'Imprisonment' right now]), the future history will prove this
correct..
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kim M" |
|
| Title: Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
27 Oct 2004 03:37:05 AM |
|
|
Thanks 'Jean' as I was not fully aware of this resolution, but as you can see
from my POST, Resolution 1441 has no relevance in what is really at stalk here
(so I say). :-(
But THANKs anyway. ;-)
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:EOIfd.3418222$ic1.348268@news.easynews.com...
The only reason was implementing 1441. It was because he had breached it.
now indeed it entails finding out about the WMDs, but also punishing him
for supporting terrorism by paying homicide bombers, for considering
Kuwait still as his own (by refusing to give them back their POWs or
their national archives after 1441 - all conditions to avoid the lifting
of the cease fire Kuwait was the first mistake he made and brought this
upon himself). Saddam breached the resolution half a dozen ways besides
his WMDs cat and mouse game, which would have not yielded any result
even given 6 more months, and HAD it he would have restarted the
programs right after.
There was no other reason that the breach of his obligations.
J.
Kim M a écrit:
This was 'Fulfilling' the Chaney / Rumsfeld 'Prophecies'.
"The Iraqi / Kuwait War was left 'un-resolved'... ".
Finding 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' was not a concern in this endeavour.
"Bring down Suddam" was the first objective (and Key objective), securing
the
'Oil Fields' of Iraq was definitely the Secondary Priority (and a major
reason
[or excuse] behind the attack on Iraq).
'Weapons of Mass Destruction' was a 'rouse' use to bring in 'naive'
countries
like Spain, Australia and Britain in to this 'deceptive' plot.
All the time, a cover-up was instigated by the G. W. Bush Government who
went to
great extent to 'quash' at the time, and any (later released) connections
between the 'Bin Ladan' family and possible 'Terrorist" attacks.
G. W. Bush may have been left in the dark about C.I.A. and FBI findings
prior to
9/11 (but the latest 'inquiry' proved (beyond a 'shadow of a doubt') that
the
C.I.A. and FBI where well aware of the possibilities of a U.S. attack using
American airplanes. Ms. Rice (possibly working on orders from above) told
them
to "stop bothering the 'Admin' with un-substantiated information".
Future 'History' will prove this correct (although I risk U.S. sanctioning
[and
possible 'Imprisonment' right now]), the future history will prove this
correct..
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: HOW then? Re: What You Are Not Supposted To Know |
27 Oct 2004 08:12:08 AM |
|
|
Kim M a écrit:
Thanks 'Jean' as I was not fully aware of this resolution, but as you can see
from my POST, Resolution 1441 has no relevance in what is really at stalk here
(so I say). :-(
But THANKs anyway. ;-)
Bah, it is because you have no clue and apparently really buy into
anything you are told not to know about 1441. It absolutely makes no
sense, and only the weasels make up that fable, like they did about
Afghanistan. We went there because of terrorism, and to Iraq because of
UN resolution. never was it about oil.
Or else, just answer to me the question in the other post I asked about
how they would even start to get even with oil and how. I mean really,
with numbers. The US doesn't get to pay less for the oil, they are not
part of the profits, all they do is pay, here.
Sure I hope that they will continue to make sure that weasels who fucked
up that country are not allowed back, but that is totally another
matter. Work in engineering is maybe 1 billion at most. And all they get
is taxes on that. Or else, since you insist on your lie, you must have
some basis for it, explain to me with (even approximate) figures how
this would bring them back more than 300 billions clear. Please do.
It is not complicated, just explain why you say that with numbers. Or
else admit that you buy the weasels lies and have no clue.
Thank you very much.
J.
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:EOIfd.3418222$ic1.348268@news.easynews.com...
The only reason was implementing 1441. It was because he had breached it.
now indeed it entails finding out about the WMDs, but also punishing him
for supporting terrorism by paying homicide bombers, for considering
Kuwait still as his own (by refusing to give them back their POWs or
their national archives after 1441 - all conditions to avoid the lifting
of the cease fire Kuwait was the first mistake he made and brought this
upon himself). Saddam breached the resolution half a dozen ways besides
his WMDs cat and mouse game, which would have not yielded any result
even given 6 more months, and HAD it he would have restarted the
programs right after.
There was no other reason that the breach of his obligations.
J.
Kim M a écrit:
This was 'Fulfilling' the Chaney / Rumsfeld 'Prophecies'.
"The Iraqi / Kuwait War was left 'un-resolved'... ".
Finding 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' was not a concern in this endeavour.
"Bring down Suddam" was the first objective (and Key objective), securing
the
'Oil Fields' of Iraq was definitely the Secondary Priority (and a major
reason
[or excuse] behind the attack on Iraq).
'Weapons of Mass Destruction' was a 'rouse' use to bring in 'naive'
countries
like Spain, Australia and Britain in to this 'deceptive' plot.
All the time, a cover-up was instigated by the G. W. Bush Government who
went to
great extent to 'quash' at the time, and any (later released) connections
between the 'Bin Ladan' family and possible 'Terrorist" attacks.
G. W. Bush may have been left in the dark about C.I.A. and FBI findings
prior to
9/11 (but the latest 'inquiry' proved (beyond a 'shadow of a doubt') that
the
C.I.A. and FBI where well aware of the possibilities of a U.S. attack using
American airplanes. Ms. Rice (possibly working on orders from above) told
them
to "stop bothering the 'Admin' with un-substantiated information".
Future 'History' will prove this correct (although I risk U.S. sanctioning
[and
possible 'Imprisonment' right now]), the future history will prove this
correct..
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
