whatever happened to sollog ?



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > whatever happened to sollog ?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "duran duran Fan"
Date: 14 Feb 2005 06:18:56 AM
Object: whatever happened to sollog ?
does he think this is the year for the 7 year covenant ?
.

User: "Fredrick Garvin"

Title: Re: whatever happened to sollog ? 14 Feb 2005 09:44:35 AM
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:18:56 +0000, duran duran Fan expelled the
following:

does he think this is the year for the 7 year covenant ?

Nobody cares.
.

User: "Flash Bazbo"

Title: Re: whatever happened to sollog ? 14 Feb 2005 12:14:55 PM
duran duran Fan wrote:

does he think this is the year for the 7 year covenant ?

He is presently obsessed with his Wikipedia article. Since the Wiki
folks are refusing to edit the article to P.ennis' specs he may be
occupied there for months.
.
User: "Cardinal Chunder"

Title: Re: whatever happened to sollog ? 14 Feb 2005 01:40:49 PM
Flash Bazbo wrote:

duran duran Fan wrote:

does he think this is the year for the 7 year covenant ?



He is presently obsessed with his Wikipedia article. Since the Wiki
folks are refusing to edit the article to P.ennis' specs he may be
occupied there for months.

Yes, he's been ineffectually attempting to have the article changed for
quite a while. Consequently it is very comprehensive and accurate.
He may also be laying low in case anyone brings up the pope, or his most
recent shitstain of a prediction concerning the superbowl.
Apparently the Steelers were going to win this year, plus the usual
vague gibberish about disasters, terrorism etc.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.gambling.sports/msg/13543fd13b17def6?dmode=source
.
User: ""

Title: Re: whatever happened to sollog ? 14 Feb 2005 04:42:56 PM
Cardinal Chunder wrote:

Flash Bazbo wrote:

duran duran Fan wrote:

does he think this is the year for the 7 year covenant ?



He is presently obsessed with his Wikipedia article. Since the

Wiki

folks are refusing to edit the article to P.ennis' specs he may be
occupied there for months.


Yes, he's been ineffectually attempting to have the article changed

for

quite a while. Consequently it is very comprehensive and accurate.

He may also be laying low in case anyone brings up the pope, or his

most

recent shitstain of a prediction concerning the superbowl.

Apparently the Steelers were going to win this year, plus the usual
vague gibberish about disasters, terrorism etc.

I think he'll be back around the end of March. He's got a 'great quake'
prediction he's going to miss so he'll back to whine and threaten in an
attempt to make us believe it was accurate.
Lazi
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER