When The Anchor Comes Loose
What to do when your compass won't work
By John Kaminski
skylax@comcast.net
3-3-4
"What do you think of David Icke?" was the question in the e-mail from
Linda.
Icke (rhymes with Mike) is the wildly popular author of a bevy of
mind-wrenching books, most recently Tales from the Time Loop, Alice in
Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster, Children of the Matrix
and another book subtitled The Robots' Guide to Freedom. A former
British soccer star turned sociopolitical guru, his most controversial
thesis is that the world is ruled by a heartless band of elite
lunatics he is predisposed to label as Reptilians.
I must admit for the longest time I dismissed him out of hand as
simply another New Age charlatan. Notwithstanding my knowing about the
triune brain in humans (and that the inner core is, in fact, the
reptilian brain), I simply don't like flip categorizations of human
groups, like calling Jews chiselers, Blacks lazy or Poles lightbulb
changers.
I first became snagged by his website by the things he reprinted from
other sources. What got me was the legendary essay "Report from Iron
Mountain," which everyone in the world should read. Then I scoped out
some his works and realized what he was up to. And what he is up to is
probably the most important task in the world - how to identify those
who control us.
Here's how I responded to that e-mail.
I think Icke may be closer to the truth than anybody else, Linda.
At the very least he is metaphorically accurate.
It's undeniable there is a genetic grouping of "relatives" who
dominate the elitist group that runs the planet. This is how people
can trace the relationship of the Sabah family that runs Kuwait to be
cousins, somewhat far removed, of both Queen Elizabeth and President
Bush
That Icke calls them "Reptilian" may be a little unnerving and perhaps
melodramatic (although there is nothing melodramatic about how our
planet is being destroyed by them), but apparently this genetic link
does exist.
Many of these rich psychos believe they are part of the bloodline of
Jesus (or Thoth, or Abraham, or Enlil), and even though it's proven
that none of these characters were actual human beings, the
pseudo-legitimacy of the claims have nevertheless been exploited to
accrue great power over the centuries. Oh that supernatural sanction!
The main hurdle we now face as a species is to realize that all these
gods we've created are merely projected shadows of our own fears, and
that cynical manipulators have been using them against us for
centuries.
A lot of people regard Icke's synopses of history as spurious
pseudoscience, but let me tell you, the official histories used by
credentialed academics, who look down their noses at alternative
versions, really have no more credibility than Icke's assertions,
maybe less.
You only have to consider what mainstream media has told us about the
war in Iraq and about 9/11 to realize that if this kind of cynical
manipulation of the true story by the powers behind the scenes has
been going on throughout history, then we don't really have any idea
what happened at any time because we only have the tailored version
the power elite used to cover up their various crimes.
When you consider this, Icke becomes credible and prescient. And
everything you ever learned about the world becomes open to question.
I believe that's the way it is, for real. I believe Icke produces a
useful template for understanding events. Nobody ever gets all the
little details right.
The top priority for humanity has become how to identify those who are
really running things, because the planet is being ruined and they are
clearly the reason.
Another e-mail I received that same day, this one from Lucille, took
me to task for blaming the Dark Ages on the newly formed Roman church
running amok. She rightly pointed out that the Dark Ages occurred
because Rome had to that point controlled most of the civilized world,
and when Rome fell apart, so did the world it controlled. All the
channels of authority disintegrated and chaos ensued. When I read her
note, I had an inkling that this is what is about to happen to America
and our whole world. A new Dark Ages, ruled by chaos and mass death.
Then my friend Pieter from Holland wrote and said he couldn't cope
with his e-mail volume, and even though he loved my essays, he asked
me to stop sending them. He also explained he'd had trouble dealing
with pronouncements about the formation of Christianity, and while he
appreciated my political perspectives, the value he'd gotten from his
beliefs and the truths he had read in Christian literature (and
Pyramid inscriptions) prevented him from acknowledging the structure
of his belief system as false. The proof, as it were, was in the
pudding.
I replied:
I know exactly what you mean about the inbox problem. Once a
week or so I have to throw away about 500 e-mails I wanted to ponder
and respond to simply because I can't deal with the volume, and I
spend all day almost every day processing them. In a way, it's a happy
problem, but frustrating. I'm sure I offend a lot of people by not
answering.
One quick note about those tantalizing historical portents, which can
be likened to the warmth of the accepted Christ vs. the flaws in the
dogma of established churches. You don't need to give up the former by
rejecting the latter. The awesome joy of accepting one's inclusion in
the divine plan is in no way nullified by discovering that many
priestly scholars are manipulative savages. This is true even if we
are merely Nibiruan dogfood. The dream is the thing that's real, even
if many of the structural directions to get us there are just so many
celestial Ponzi schemes.
That's why people who are really solid in their faith don't get upset
when I set a match to the fantastic fabrications of religious dogma.
They know who their God is, and the validity of their allegiance to
goodness and the life force. Sure, they may loosen their collars a bit
when I start going into how Jesus the historical character is largely
a work of fiction, but academic repartee of that nature is not going
to shake the emotional foundations of what they know in their bones to
be true, that acknowledging you only work for the higher plan is a far
stronger force than some clumsy catechism based on ancient and
confabulated fictions.
It's only the poseurs who are NOT sure of their faith who get upset
when I start trashing the criminal manipulators who attended the
Council of Nicea, or the psychotic propagandists who spasmodically
insist exactly six millions Jews died in the German gas chambers. When
I say with conviction there were NO German gas chambers, those whose
faith is based on a febrile fealty to their ethnic group rather than
certainty in the ground of their being instantly go mad, and start
arguing that freedom of speech must be curtailed, and we may not talk
about this topic.
In this same vein I believe that those who evangelize and desperately
try to get others to accept their chosen path are really nonbelievers
who are so insecure about their own beliefs that have to put bandages
on their own doubts by getting others to accept the very thing they
are not sure about.
So I copied this response to Pieter (and the one to Linda) to my
friend and beloved Rense columnist Jude Moriarty. She was thankful and
replied:
"John...thanks for sending. I had never seen the ICKE site ...its
humor is really something. In my many readings of documents/reports
from various gatherings of the "elite" it is notable that they really
do have this delusionary mindset that they are the appointed
guardians/gatekeepers/special bloodline: Mad yes, but they believe it
.... so remarks like "we have to rid the world of 4 billion people" can
be made without any semblance of humanity .... I don't know how many
times in conversations with some pretty credentialed astute
writers-poets-engineers-etc., that I've heard the same
remarks/observations - that so-and-so appears human, has the
mannerisms of a human, but something is missing, there's an empty or
chaotic nothingness in the eyes (windows to the soul) ... stands to
reason if someone is soulless the eyes have it. But then who would
believe - and that's the charm of it ... but one knows
madness-inhumanness when in the presence of it. If one has any
semblance of discernment that is. Most people don't."
We see the world around us being poisoned, prostituted, destroyed. Who
are the soulless people responsible for such a crime against God?
Is it really us, or is someone else? Sure we'd like to blame someone
else, but many of us are genuinely doing the best we can to stop the
murderous madness. Who are those who don't?
Yesterday morning, the very first e-mail I received, from Greg,
contained the excellent recommendation to read a chapter of Carlos
Castaneda's The Active Side of Infinity, the one called "Mud Shadows."
As it happened, I had it in my bookcase. It was an excellent way to
start the day.
Carlos the perpetually puzzled student was listening to his guru, the
sage Indian nagual don Juan Matus, who told him (and I am condensing
greatly):
The ancient sorcerors of Mexico discovered we have a companion for
life. "We have a predator that came from the depths of the cosmos and
took over the rule of our lives. Human beings are its prisoners." don
Juan said this was "the topic of topics."
Sorcerors believe that the predators have given us our system of
beliefs, our ideas of good and evil, our social mores. They are the
ones who set up our hopes and expectations and dreams of success or
failure. Through social customs, the predators superimposed their mind
on our own.
Castaneda's whole theory throughout his astonishing series of don Juan
books is that humans must resist this predatory mindset that has been
imposed on humans by mysterious forces we don't usually notice.
He has don Juan saying: "We are energetic probes created by the
universe ... we are the means by which the universe becomes aware of
itself."
Now ... this conclusion. Castaneda's mysterious shadows that prey on
our minds, and were put there long ago by the creators of social
custom, are not that far afield from the mysterious Reptilians whom
Icke posits are controlling and savaging our world.
For years in much New Age literature, would-be gurus have been
pointing to a moment in time that (to my mind) was first noted by Jose
Argüélles in his analyses of the 25,000-year-long Mayan calendar, a
calendar which ends - not so incidentally - in the year 2012. Galactic
synchronization, he called it. The exponential expansion of
consciousness in the way I see it. The hyperbolic accleration of all
human systems all point to it as occurring soon.
When this moment comes, the shameful rhetoric of George W. Bush and
all his cynical rhetoricians will not stand up to the challenge. All
those Democratic luminaries who silently pretend 9/11 was not an
inside job, and America's criminal invasion of the rest of the world
is an inevitable development of manifest destiny will not stand up to
the gut-wrenching test we are all approaching at breakneck speed.
First on the list of challenges we face is to identify the
subterranean triggers that makes us kill each other and everything
around us. These triggers are both people of great power and ideas
that are universally accepted.
Hence the confluence of Icke's Reptilians and Castaneda's predators.
The choice is clear. We either send them packing to rubbish heap of
evolution or let them destroy us and everything we love.
How do we do that?
Stand in your own truth. Never fear what you may not avoid.
You are the reason God exists. Find your job and do it. We're all
depending on you. We're all in this together. Nobody gets out of here
alive. But that's no reason to take everybody else with us when we go.
Or, as don Juan said, we are the means by which the universe becomes
aware of itself. If we don't do it, no one will, and that would be the
greatest tragedy of all.
John Kaminski is the author of "America's Autopsy Report," a
collection of his Internet essays published by Dandelion Books and
featured on hundreds of websites around the world. For more
information on how to get this book or to financially support his
work, go to http://www.johnkaminski.com/. Or, to read some more of his
recent essays for free, go to
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
Hmmmm, just another log for the fire.
www.davidicke.com
.
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: When the anchor comes loose |
05 Mar 2004 02:10:17 PM |
|
|
DaarkSyde <DaarkSyde@everywhere.com> wrote:
When The Anchor Comes Loose
What to do when your compass won't work
By John the Jew Kaminski
exlax@comcast.net
3-3-4
"What do you think of David Icke?" was the question in the e-mail
Ikey is a Yiddish STALKING HORSE tantalizing his audience with
titillating insider details of the genuine conpiracy. EOS.
Grantland
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Saint Isidore of Laytonville" |
|
| Title: Re: When the anchor comes loose |
04 Mar 2004 05:06:14 PM |
|
|
Spot weld it and sink it again in the right spot.
Did you know that Dubya had his dog Spot
executed?
.
|
|
|
| User: "david lindauer" |
|
| Title: Re: When the anchor comes loose |
05 Mar 2004 12:00:06 AM |
|
|
yeah i heard spot was going to hold a news conference so he had to go...
Saint Isidore of Laytonville wrote:
Spot weld it and sink it again in the right spot.
Did you know that Dubya had his dog Spot
executed?
.
|
|
|
| User: "DaarkSyde" |
|
| Title: Re: When the anchor comes loose |
05 Mar 2004 08:59:10 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 01:00:06 -0500, david lindauer
<camille@bluegrass.net> wrote:
yeah i heard spot was going to hold a news conference so he had to go...
Saint Isidore of Laytonville wrote:
Spot weld it and sink it again in the right spot.
Did you know that Dubya had his dog Spot
executed?
Hehehehe wouldn't suprise me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Saint Isidore of Laytonville" |
|
| Title: Re: When the anchor comes loose |
05 Mar 2004 11:19:56 AM |
|
|
The Ashcroft gall stones will roll.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
