Sorry for the typo I meant St. Malachy.
"Cenobita" <Tao@a.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:eftpdu$p61$1@hefestos.uned.es...

So I reckon it is 2016 then?
According to St. Ezequiel there will only be one pope after Ratzinger.
"Claude Latremouille" <cj559@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> escribió en el mensaje
news:efs1b0$7df$1@theodyn.ncf.ca...

*
On 2 Oct 2006 13:43:28 -0700,

Werewolfy wrote:

The date is fully given by Nostradamus. The time of his glory

be

in year 3218

Pretty 'safe' with that one I should think my old Rhino..

Yes, for sure
But, if you would look at those given words by Nostradamus from one
single line:
"De trois deux l'un huictiesme" = From 3218th

Rino

*
-------------- C E N T V R I E___H V I T I E M E. ------------
------------------ (édition prétendue de 1568) ---------------
*
--------------------------- L X I X. -------------------------
--------- Aupres du ieune le vieux ange baisser, -------------
--------- Et le viendra surmonter à la fin: ------------------
--------- Dix ans esgaux au plus vieux rabaisser, ------------
--------- De trois deux l'vn l'huitiesme seraphin. -----------
*
The line reads : De trois deux l'vn l'huitiesme seraphin. So, in
six words, you managed to misquote three! And as you can see, the
word "huitiesme" is spelled without a 'c'. And you omitted the
last word which helps understand the meaning of the line. Swell!
*
One of the decyphered versions of quatrain VIII-69 follows:
*
--------- I'ai veu Paris brusler en esté, l'An Deux ----------
--------- Mil Dix Sept, d'vng rude Atome mal -----------------
--------- tiré dessus l'Asie par le si Grand U S, ma ---------
--------- Prophétie sur la si chaude Année XVII : ------------
*
Have a nice day, folks!
*
Claude Latrémouille
October 2, 2006
http://web.ncf.ca/cj559
*
===

So you say that the mention of a stone in the Bible refers to
something OTHER than a simple stone? To what does it refer then? Why
can it not be a literal stone? Do you have a degree in theology? Can
you explain?

You show documentation for the rock being from God, or even being from
the time of Joshua, or that Joshua put his hands literally on a rock
that was handed to him by God, then you can graduate with honors from
theology.

doctorate to have common sense, fella, and be suspicious about the
origins of a rock, the highly interpretive biblical passages, or the
fanatical motivations of fervent believers. If you had a bit of common
sense and rationality, you'd be asking for documentation of that
precious rock,

explain what you thought the rock represented, and provided background
info on it. Instead, you typed a few header words and gave us a link to
look at a rock. Dishonesty and deception. That is why I said: you have a
rock for a brain, and I meant it, fella!

I don't see where in your reply you have given any indication to the
contrary other than an empty opinion.

Well, you have your 'opinion' that the rock represents a version of a
Rapture, and I have no interest in your version or your hair-brained
opinion or your belief. Opinions are many, and vary greatly. I have an
interest in responding to a half-***** post put up by a half-wit that
wants to believe in some unsubstantiated, highly interpretive, fanatical
thing.

I might be just as skeptical as you but you wouldn't know it unless
you wrote back with something worth reading.

I'm a writer, fella, and a researcher...I would suggest you DO some
research on the material you post beforehand, and write a bit more about
what you're posting. As I said in a previous post, you can believe in
anything by just believing in it, and when it comes to the Bible, Christ
said faith in the truth he spoke about is all that is needed to enter
his Father's Kingdom. If Jesus or God wants to show humanity a rock, and
that rock is affirmation for that faith, then it'll be clear to all true
believers, as Jesus illustrated with purported 'miracles' in his time
for affirmation for believers. The 'rock' is the establishment of God's
church on earth, the seven eyes are the seven churches -- in those days,
conceptions of common objects were frequently used to impress a point
upon people. A rock is a solid thing, and God wanted his church to be
solid thing, with his 'eyes' to be the seven churches...do you think
Revelation should be taken literally, too? You need to do some more
biblical reading and researching, and stay away from literal translations.

I thought at least I'd get a chuckle or something for the pictures!
Perhaps even a response from someone that noticed the lettering YASUA
on it.

If not a literal stone, then could this stone be a dupe? I'm just
asking the questions, not adamantly portraying it as fact.

§

Uh, huh...well, congratulations on beng deceptive. Jesus likes that
quality in human beings, doesn't he? First you diss me for not being
theologically astute, and then you end your reply with a convenient
'out' for yourself, excusing and explaining yourself for posting a silly
message. Your reply not only shows a lack of brains, but a curious
childish spitefulness that reminds me of a poster called Bud.
Take your rock and stuff it...where Jesus doesn't shine.
Docrodile

"Steven" <none@none.ccom> wrote in message
news:dcbuh.5270$1x.89987@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...

I doubt it.

Docrodile wrote:

I have a rock just like that one...

"Steven" <none@none.ccom> wrote in message
news:LMZth.4990$1x.85936@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...

He might be here already trying to expose the false rapture.

Have a look at the rock on this page:

http://saj.deena.ca

§

Cenobyte wrote:

In Jesus´ own words he did not tell when it was,it is unclear if
Nostradamus
knew this.¿Ideas?
¿Did Nostradamus prophetisize this?
¿Where will he be born?

On Jan 27, 7:32?am, Steven <n...@none.ccom> wrote:

If not a literal stone, then could this stone be a dupe? I'm just
asking the questions, not adamantly portraying it as fact.

Well, it's not a question worth asking really. It's a bit silly I
think.
Much as one ignores Jehovah's witnesses at the door, one also ignores
wild claims such as this.

Werewolfy

On Jan 27, 7:32?am, Steven <n...@none.ccom> wrote:

If not a literal stone, then could this stone be a dupe? I'm just asking the questions, not adamantly portraying it as fact.

Well, it's not a question worth asking really. It's a bit silly I
think.
Much as one ignores Jehovah's witnesses at the door, one also ignores
wild claims such as this.

Werewolfy