| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"fuck you" |
| Date: |
10 Apr 2006 12:47:55 PM |
| Object: |
White House Plays Down Report on Plans for Iran Nuclear Strike |
THEY WILL NEVER REALLY DO ANYTHING TO SERIOUSLY DO DAMAGE TO IRAN. YOU
WANT TO KNOW WHY? THE AMERICANS WILL FUCKING CRY UNCLE WAY BEFORE THE
FUCKING PERSIAN PUSSIES DO, EVEN THOUGH THE US WILL NOT SUFFER ONE
CASUALTY AND IRAN MAY SUFFER HUNDREDS, BECAUSE THE GEO-ECONOMIC IMPACT
OF OIL DISRUPTIONS AND ITS EFFECT ON MARKET STABILITY WILL HUIRT THE
FUCKING PEICE OF ***** NASTY FUCKER AMERICANS WHO ARE SO FUCKING FAT
THAT THEY LEAK ***** LIKE JELLY DONUTS LEAK JELLY EVEN MORE. THE
DISPRUPTIONS THIS WILL CAUSE ON AMERICA'S NEED TO CONSUME LIKE FILTHLY
FUCKERS WHO ARE SO FAT THAT IT TAKES 45 MINUTES TO GET TO THE BATHROOM
SO THEY JUST PERFER TO ***** IN THEIR PANTS WILL MAKE THE AMERICANS CRY
UNLCE ****WAAAAY**** BEFORE THE IRANIANS DO. AND GUESS WHAT, THE MORE
THESE FILTHY FUCKER NEED TO CONSUME, THE MORE COMMODITIES LIKE OIL GO
UP, MAKING THEM EVEN MORE VULNERABLE TO THIS PHENOMENA BROUGHT ABOUT BY
DISRUPTION. ***** AMERICA.
White House Plays Down Report on Plans for Iran Nuclear Strike
April 10 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. President George W. Bush is focused on a
diplomatic compromise to Iran's pursuit of nuclear power technology and
isn't contemplating military strikes to destroy suspected atomic weapon
sites, the White House said.
``We are pursuing a diplomatic solution,'' White House spokesman Scott
McClellan said at a briefing today. ``The international community is
united in its concern about the regime obtaining a nuclear weapons
capability.''
An article by Seymour Hersh in this week's issue of New Yorker magazine
claims the U.S. is stepping up plans for a possible nuclear bombing of
Iran to destroy suspected atomic weapons sites and topple President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
The Washington Post yesterday also reported that the U.S. is studying
military options against Iran but only as part of a strategy to
pressure Iran to back off its nuclear development program. The
newspaper, citing unnamed military and intelligence officials, said
attacks aren't likely.
``What you're reading is just wild speculation,'' Bush said of the
reports while at an event in Washington.
Still, Bush was clear about the administration's opposition to Iran's
nuclear program.
``We do not want the Iranians to have a nuclear weapon, the capacity to
make a nuclear weapons or the knowledge of how to make nuclear
weapons,'' Bush said.
Ahmadinejad authorized the restart of Iran's nuclear research,
including the conversion and enrichment of uranium, shortly after he
took office in August. Ahmadinejad maintains that Iran's nuclear
program will be for peaceful purposes such as for fuel and he has no
intention of building nuclear weapons.
Iran today accused the U.S. of conducting ``psychological warfare
stemming from America's anger and helplessness,'' Iranian Foreign
Ministry Spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi told reporters in Tehran today,
Agence France Presse reported.
Nuclear Option
Hersh reported in the New Yorker article that the U.S. may use ``bunker
busting'' tactical nuclear weapons if it were to take a strike at
Iran's main atomic centrifuge plant at Natanz, located 200 miles (320
kilometers) south of Tehran. Conventional weapons might not fully
destroy laboratories that are in bunkers 75 feet below ground, Hersh
wrote.
Military officials have asked the White House to remove the
nuclear-bombing option from a menu of military plans, Hersh said today
in a Cable News Network interview about his article.
``The White House refused to rescind it. They told the planners to keep
it in the plan, and that's the issue,'' Hersh said. ``Nobody, I think,
in the military wants to use nuclear weapons but it's still in the
plan.''
If Bush doesn't abandon the nuclear option, Hersh said he's been told
some ``senior officers'' in the Pentagon will resign, he said on CNN.
British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw told British Broadcasting Corp.
television yesterday that he is ``certain'' neither the U.S. nor
Britain would preemptively attack Iran ``because there is no reason for
it.'' He said, ``The idea of a nuclear strike on Iran is completely
nuts.''
The U.S. is pressing the United Nations to impose economic sanctions to
force Iran to abandon nuclear enrichment. Those efforts have been
frustrated so far because of opposition from China and Russia, both
permanent members of the Security Council with veto power.
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
