For all of the fools who can't face reality. If you ahve a problem
with these stats, take them up with the various governements
(US/UK/AUS/NZ) that compiled them.
Tony
By 1994, most European Union member states had an average 10 - 15 per cent
non-White population, with this figure effectively doubling every fifteen
years. This will mean that, unless current immigration trends are halted, all
of Western Europe will have a non-White majority population by the year 2090 at
the latest, and possibly earlier. These statistics are from the EU's own
official records, Eurostat, in Belgium.
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to the 1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS), 40 per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a White
partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the sexual divide, where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity in the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
(If white women are having black children, then the white race ceases to
exist.)
HISPANIC Immigration SET TO SWAMP MANY SOUTHERN STATES
A 1996 report on population trends in America, issued by that country's
official census office, revealed the full extent of Mexican and other Hispanic
immigration from Central and South America. The report predicted that natural
Hispanic reproduction rates will mean that by the 2005, Hispanics will surpass
Blacks as the largest minority. In that respect, the report failed to take into
account the effect of mass illegal immigration, ad Hispanics surpassed Blacks
as the largest minority group in mid 2003, when they officially topped 38.8
million in number.
From 2020, the US Census office says, more Mexicans will be added to the
population each year than Blacks, Asians and Amerinds combined. From 2019, the
relatively youthful Mexican population will have America's lowest death rate.
According to the census bureau, in 1998 there were over ten million Mexican
children under the age of eighteen. This has led to entire slices of many of
the southern states of America: New Mexico, Texas and southern California,
becoming virtual tiny replicas of Mexico, with the lingua franca becoming
Mexican Spanish rather than English.
White American Decline
The long-term rise in the number of Hispanics, who have the highest birth and
immigration rates in America, will coincide with a decline in the number of
Whites, the report states, predicting that by 2028, the number of White
Americans dying will exceed those being born.
The population as a whole is projected to increase by 50 per cent by 2050, to
394 million, from 263 million in 1995. Although the White population is set to
increase steadily in real numbers, expressed as a percentage of the entire
American population, their numbers are in radical decline: in 1996, Whites made
up 73.1 per cent of the population. That is projected to fall to 52.8 per cent
by 2050.
USA Population Projections, millions (rounded off)
total white %white
2010 298 202 68
2020 323 207 64
2050 394 208 53
2100 571 219 45
(Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series
P25-1130, "Population Projections of the United States by Age, Sex, Race, and
Hispanic Origin: 1995 to 2050". )
CANADA - MASSIVE ASIAN IMMIGRATION
According to Canadian government figures, from 1981 to 1991, 74 per cent of all
legal immigrants to Canada came from non-White countries. During this time
there were 1.3 million legal immigrants: 26 per cent came from Europe; 47 per
cent came from Asia (Chinese is the fastest-growing mother tongue in Canada);
12 per cent from South America or the Caribbean; 9 per cent from North and
Central America, and 6 per cent from Africa.
Due to declining White birth rates - in 1997 the birth rate was 1.67 children
born per woman, (less than the replacement rate of 2.1) the Canadian government
formally decided in the 1980s to actively seek out further immigrants. The top
ten source countries (in order) in 1995, were Hong Kong, India, the
Philippines, China, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, England, the
United States, and Pakistan.
In 1997, Amerinds officially made up three per cent of the population
(865,400), while officially Blacks made up two per cent (576,920). The
established Asian population was swelled by 962,000 immigrants in the 1980s -
pushing the total of Asians well over the 2,8 million mark.
These are all official figures of legal immigrants: illegal immigration always
shadows legal immigration, and it is possible that the actual figures may be
nearly double the legal ones.
Given that the total population of Canada in 1996 was 28,846,761, some three
million or more legal non-White immigrants have settled in that country prior
to the year 2000. In terms of illegal immigrants, the number is of course far
higher. All this translates to a non-White population of just under 5 million -
or 17 percent of the total population - in 1996. This figure is set to increase
exponentially.
AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND - ASIAN AND MIDDLE EASTERN INFLUX
Prior to the 1970s, virtually all immigration to Australia was White: however,
like the rest of Europe and North America, the last 25 years of the 20th
century has seen a massive increase in non-White immigration into Australia,
mostly from Asian countries.
According to the 1991 census, Australia had a population of 16,849,496. The
1995 estimated population, including Christmas Island, Cocos Islands, and
Norfolk Island, was 18,338,000.
Australia's total population grew at an annual rate of about 1.4 percent in the
early 1990s. The principal reasons for this growth were the continued high
level of immigration and the associated increase in the numbers of younger
people in the childbearing and childrearing age groups.
AUSTRALIA 27% ASIAN BY 2025
White Decline - from 30% of World's Population to 15% in 2000
The massive increases in the world's total non-White population also makes
serious food for thought: in 1900, the earth's population stood at 1,625
million, with some 485 million being White. This meant that some 30 per cent of
the earth's population was White at the beginning of the 20th century.
In the year 2000, the earth's population will stand at around 6,095 million,
with around 953 million being White. Although this is an increase, in terms of
the total planet's population, it marks a drop of over 50 per cent - in 2000,
Whites will make up only 15 per cent of the earth's population.
The exponential and explosive growth of the non-White population of the earth -
which effectively doubles itself every 34 years -(compared with White
population which now only doubles itself every 200 years), means that by the
year 2100, only three per cent of the earth's population will be White.
.
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
09 Dec 2004 07:16:14 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero
wrote:
Absolute Zero wrote:
victor wrote:
"Die out" seems extreme. Mixed in sounds better.
"Over a 100-150 yr time span if things >>don't change they will"
Die out that is... a claim he's made >>numerous times.
A LUDICROUS claim I might add. >Iceland? Finland? ...
Finland is already beginning to be invaded. Iceland? You've got to be kidding,
there's more people within 2 miles of me than there is in Iceland.
It's irrelevant.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
09 Dec 2004 07:54:36 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041209081614.08281.00002186@mb-m04.aol.com...
Absolute Zero
wrote:
Absolute Zero wrote:
victor wrote:
"Die out" seems extreme. Mixed in sounds better.
"Over a 100-150 yr time span if things >>don't change they will"
Die out that is... a claim he's made >>numerous times.
A LUDICROUS claim I might add. >Iceland? Finland? ...
Finland is already beginning to be invaded
Not 'ardly. Care to make a wild, stab-in-the-dark guess as to how many
people in
Finland don't even have piercingly blue eyes and white-blond hair (and a
gluten allergy, interestingly)?
Of course, the Sami might say they were invaded long ago by whitey...
Iceland? You've got to be kidding,
No she's not kidding. You do understand what "die out" means, don't you?
there's more people within 2 miles of me than there is in Iceland.
300,000 odd. A viable breeding population, perfeectly capable of
sustaining/restocking the "white race".
It's irrelevant.
Far from it. See above.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
09 Dec 2004 07:11:39 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
victor wrote:
Your evoking of the 'you cannot prove a >>negative' was inappropriate.
That only applies when there is an >>extraordinary claim that almost
totally defies science or reason; or >>includes myths or the supernatural.
Yep, but since they know that they are wrong, Amy and crew have nothing
else to
say.
Sheesh Dee, I know that about proving >negatives...
But Tony doesn't... well he does now :)
You entirely missed Dee's point, or more like you ignored it.
No I didn't.
Essentially I agree that with Dee that it's reasonable to present a
better model. This is how science proceeds. Beyond self-referential
logic and derived mathematics, nothing is absolutely provable.
Poor old Bertrand Russell in /Principia Mathematica/ took 101 pages of
pure logic to prove that 1 + 1 = 2
He was very thorough.
If you want me to say so, I side with Dee over Woods on this
sub-sub-sub-issue.
But, seeing as I don't care one way or the >other whether the white race
is to die out,
Because as I have already proven, you do not care what happens to those you
follow you.
it's hardly down to me to make the >counter case, is it? Twas all to the
cause of getting YOU to make it.
-A
It's been done, I'm not going to play some game with you.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
09 Dec 2004 06:29:13 PM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
victor wrote:
Your evoking of the 'you cannot prove a >>negative' was inappropriate.
That only applies when there is an >>extraordinary claim that almost
totally defies science or reason; or >>includes myths or the supernatural.
Yep, but since they know that they are wrong, Amy and crew have nothing
else to
say.
Sheesh Dee, I know that about proving >negatives...
But Tony doesn't... well he does now :)
You entirely missed Dee's point, or more like you ignored it.
No I didn't.
Essentially I agree that with Dee that it's reasonable to present a
better model. This is how science proceeds. Beyond self-referential
logic and derived mathematics, nothing is absolutely provable.
Poor old Bertrand Russell in /Principia Mathematica/ took 101 pages of
pure logic to prove that 1 + 1 = 2
He was very thorough.
If you want me to say so, I side with Dee over Woods on this
sub-sub-sub-issue.
But, seeing as I don't care one way or the >other whether the white race
is to die out,
Because as I have already proven, you do not care what happens to those you
follow you.
I do care... I hope to God they don't run into sick fucks like you.
-A
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
07 Dec 2004 06:27:25 PM |
|
|
Absolute Zero wrote:
victor wrote:
Damn this new Google format.
They asked me for a nickname. I didn't know they meant screen name.
Your evoking of the 'you cannot prove a negative' was inappropriate.
That only applies when there is an extraordinary claim that almost
totally defies science or reason; or includes myths or the
supernatural. For instance, if Tony claimed there were four giant
invisible tortoises at the South Pole responsible for rotating the
earth and prove him wrong, you could respond with taunts and 'you
cannot prove a negative'.
Debates or court cases often involve proving a negative. There is a
claim for the affirmative and you can if you wish counter by proving
the negative. Appropriate retorts would be assailing Tony's character
or sources, which you did. But invoking the axiom of 'you cannot prove
a negative' was inappropriate in this instance, in my opinion, because
there were stats presented which could be verified or assailed by
research or search. I could be more specific, but what the heck.
If facts are presented, smearing only, would probably lose the debate
in a proper forum interested in the truth.
Sheesh Dee, I know that about proving negatives...
I should elucidate. I know that in this case it's reasonable to present
contrary data and I have. But why should I have to? I don't care one way
or the other. He is the one making the claim, he should present the
evidence... preferably not from a race hate, holocaust denying web site.
He's passed through today without touching your link or my article. If
you insist on doing your cavalry act in spite of your obvious distaste
for the motion... go to it.
Have you lost the ability to quote?
-A
But Tony doesn't... well he does now :)
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
08 Dec 2004 06:13:16 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero
wrote:
I should elucidate. I know that in this >case it's reasonable to present
contrary >data and I have.
You've done no such thing, you posted the opinion of one man, I have posted
data by the UN and US government.
But why should I have to?
LOL!!! Hard to do when you can't, ain't it?
Amy, you've been thourouhgly defeated in this, all you can do is hurl insults,
mention my last name, my wife's name, etc.
You've been proven once again to not be able to compete with me even with help
from several of your friends.
Gee, you're stupid.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
08 Dec 2004 03:44:20 PM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
Absolute Zero
wrote:
I should elucidate. I know that in this >case it's reasonable to present
contrary >data and I have.
You've done no such thing, you posted the opinion of one man, I have posted
data by the UN and US government.
*sigh* - I'm not going to ask the question twice, see below.
But why should I have to?
LOL!!! Hard to do when you can't, ain't it?
Amy, you've been thourouhgly defeated in this, all you can do is hurl insults,
mention my last name, my wife's name, etc.
LOL!!!
You've been proven once again to not be able to compete with me even with help
from several of your friends.
LOL!!!
Gee, you're stupid.
Okay twat, help me out here if you will.
Where [and it will have to be from the UN data] does it state or
reasonably imply that "Whites will be 3% of the World's population in
2100"? Show me.
Eh?
Pardon?
I didn't catch that?
Where?
What... you can't?
Tony <== thicko
-A
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
08 Dec 2004 03:56:57 PM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
Addendum:
[8<]
You've been proven once again to not be able to compete with me even with help
from several of your friends.
You've got Dr's Strangelove and Troy <== strange bedfellows indeed.
If nothing else, Vik won't let us take advantage of your knuckle
draggin' ignorance. As frankly we do from time to time ;)
Gee, you're stupid.
hehe
Dee will let you know if/when you've really won something or other, okay?
Tony
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "victor" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
08 Dec 2004 04:54:19 PM |
|
|
Well it would help if you can refute the stats for Australia, Europe
and elsewhere outside of the US. If not, unfortunately the article
might not be far off. You are impugning without checking. As it stands,
China, India, the Middle East, Central Asia, Oceania, Latin America,
make up a large percentage of the population today, without taking into
account immigration.
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
09 Dec 2004 07:29:30 AM |
|
|
victor"
wrote:
Well it would help if you can refute the stats for Australia, Europe
and elsewhere outside of the US. If not, unfortunately the article
might not be far off. You are impugning without checking. As it stands,
China, India, the Middle East, Central Asia, Oceania, Latin America,
make up a large percentage of the population today, without taking into
account immigration.
Of course, but the Bufoons who are arguing against this are doing so just so
they do not have to admit being wrong.
They can show no evidence that the white race is forecast to increase over the
next 100 years, likewise they cannot show data that indicates a decline in
population for Asians, Blacks or Latins.
They have no argument, other than to argue for the sake of nothing better to
do.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 08:32:00 AM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
For all of the fools who can't face reality. If you ahve a problem
with these stats, take them up with the various governements
(US/UK/AUS/NZ) that compiled them.
Tony
No link Tony? Embarassed at your sources?
Let me help you out.
http://www.white-history.com/hwr67.htm
Check out the pantheon of "white" "titans" on the front page.
http://www.white-history.com
Yep, that's Tony's secret hero, Adolph.
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 08:54:52 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
For all of the fools who can't face reality. If you ahve a problem
with these stats, take them up with the various governements
(US/UK/AUS/NZ) that compiled them.
Tony
No link Tony?
Embarassed that the above governments back up these stats?
Deal with it Wacko, your denial will not change it.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 09:09:37 AM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
For all of the fools who can't face reality. If you ahve a problem
with these stats, take them up with the various governements
(US/UK/AUS/NZ) that compiled them.
Tony
No link Tony?
Embarassed that the above governments back up these stats?
Deal with it Wacko,
...says the neo-NAZI, opiate pushing, incest promoting pervert/christian.
your denial will not change it.
Look sweetie, go to the primary sources and quote them, if you can.
Or are we supposed to take the interpretation/spin/lies of a white
supremacist web site at face value, eh?
I see the scissors are fully sharpened today, Phoney.
=>
No link Tony? Embarassed at your sources?
Let me help you out.
http://www.white-history.com/hwr67.htm
Check out the pantheon of "white" "titans" on the front page.
http://www.white-history.com
Yep, that's Tony's secret hero, Adolph.
<=
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 09:12:48 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
For all of the fools who can't face reality. If you ahve a problem
with these stats, take them up with the various governements
(US/UK/AUS/NZ) that compiled them.
Tony
No link Tony?
Embarassed that the above >governments back up these stats?
Deal with it Wacko,
your denial will not change it.
Look sweetie,
***** you, Wacko, prove me wrong or STFU, as you can't. I'll expect that you
will STFU.
Yep, that's Tony's secret hero, Adolph.
-A
Don't confuse me with your little freak's friends (Grant etc).
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 09:16:21 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205101248.06439.00001438@mb-m18.aol.com...
***** you, Wacko, prove me wrong or STFU, as you can't. I'll expect that
you
will STFU.
Oh dear, the lardy one is getting his 'facts' from his racist sites again
and doesn't like being called on it ;0)
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
11 Dec 2004 03:48:35 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 15:16:21 GMT, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205101248.06439.00001438@mb-m18.aol.com...
***** you, Wacko, prove me wrong or STFU, as you can't. I'll expect that
you
will STFU.
Oh dear, the lardy one is getting his 'facts' from his racist sites again
and doesn't like being called on it ;0)
"the lardy one" .. hehe. So glad you're back, Krib! Missed your
humor and witty comebacks.
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 09:18:47 AM |
|
|
No link Tony? Embarassed at your sources?
Let me help you out.
http://www.white-history.com/hwr67.htm
Check out the pantheon of "white" "titans" on the front page.
http://www.white-history.com
Yep, that's Tony's secret hero, Adolph.
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 09:21:15 AM |
|
|
Liberals are frustrated at the inability to prove the posted stats wrong, so
they resort to name calling and disinformation.
Typical Liberals tactics.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 10:55:28 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205102115.06439.00001442@mb-m18.aol.com...
Liberals are frustrated at the inability to prove the posted stats wrong,
so
they resort to name calling and disinformation.
So you can't cite a source that isn't tied into one of your racist groups
then?
Typical Liberals tactics.
Name calling eh? liberal tactic there tone.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 02:38:28 PM |
|
|
In article <44Hsd.1701$wI2.1375@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net>, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205102115.06439.00001442@mb-m18.aol.com...
Liberals are frustrated at the inability to prove the posted stats wrong,
so
they resort to name calling and disinformation.
So you can't cite a source that isn't tied into one of your racist groups
then?
Obviously not, It would appear that he's instead backpeddled into trying to get
someone to locate a source that would waste its time tracking crap like that
just to come up with "proof" that the White Class would remain pure. Nobody but
a White Supremecist would even care how immigration affects the "purity" of the
White race, so any source that disagreed with his source would just be another
White Supremecist site. But, of course, you won't find a White Supremecist site
that disagrees, because then none of the racists would be whipped enough into a
frenzy to bother reading their dreck.
Typical Liberals tactics.
Name calling eh? liberal tactic there tone.
Heh.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
08 Dec 2004 06:23:44 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205102115.06439.00001442@mb-m18.aol.com...
Liberals are frustrated at the inability to prove the posted stats wrong,
so
they resort to name calling and >>>disinformation.
So you can't cite a source that isn't tied >>into one of your racist groups
then?
Obviously not,
I'm really starting to think that you people are all a bunch of brainless
zombies.
I posted the UN info, Dee posted a link to the US Census, the truth is you
won't believe anything that isn't already in your heads.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
08 Dec 2004 04:20:32 PM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205102115.06439.00001442@mb-m18.aol.com...
Liberals are frustrated at the inability to prove the posted stats wrong,
so
they resort to name calling and >>>disinformation.
So you can't cite a source that isn't tied >>into one of your racist groups
then?
Obviously not,
I'm really starting to think that you people are all a bunch of brainless
zombies.
I posted the UN info, Dee posted a link to the US Census, the truth is you
won't believe anything that isn't already in your heads.
One. More. Time.
All. Together. Now.............
Where exactly did either of those sites indicate that...
"Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100"
? ? ?
Inquiring minds etc.
-A
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
09 Dec 2004 07:03:57 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205102115.06439.00001442@mb-m18.aol.com...
Liberals are frustrated at the inability to prove the posted stats wrong,
so
they resort to name calling and >>>disinformation.
So you can't cite a source that isn't tied >>into one of your racist
groups
then?
Obviously not,
I'm really starting to think that you people are all a bunch of brainless
zombies.
I posted the UN info, Dee posted a link to the US Census, the truth is you
won't believe anything that isn't already >>in your heads.
.....
Where exactly did either of those sites >indicate that... "Whites will be 3%
of the >World's population in 2100"
Anyone capable of doing a little extrapolation can see that this is true.
All predictions put whites at less than 50% of the US population by 2050, the
white population is shrinking even faster in Europe. Not hard to figure at all.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
09 Dec 2004 07:07:59 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041209080357.08281.00002183@mb-m04.aol.com...
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205102115.06439.00001442@mb-m18.aol.com...
Liberals are frustrated at the inability to prove the posted stats
wrong,
so
they resort to name calling and >>>disinformation.
So you can't cite a source that isn't tied >>into one of your racist
groups
then?
Obviously not,
I'm really starting to think that you people are all a bunch of
brainless
zombies.
I posted the UN info, Dee posted a link to the US Census, the truth is
you
won't believe anything that isn't already >>in your heads.
....
Where exactly did either of those sites >indicate that... "Whites will be
3%
of the >World's population in 2100"
Anyone capable of doing a little extrapolation can see that this is true.
So in other words the UN didn't claim anything of the sort. Thankyou.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
09 Dec 2004 05:28:26 PM |
|
|
In article <cp9ig6$hsc$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>, "tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041209080357.08281.00002183@mb-m04.aol.com...
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205102115.06439.00001442@mb-m18.aol.com...
Liberals are frustrated at the inability to prove the posted stats
wrong,
so
they resort to name calling and >>>disinformation.
So you can't cite a source that isn't tied >>into one of your racist
groups
then?
Obviously not,
I'm really starting to think that you people are all a bunch of
brainless
zombies.
I posted the UN info, Dee posted a link to the US Census, the truth is
you
won't believe anything that isn't already >>in your heads.
....
Where exactly did either of those sites >indicate that... "Whites will be
3%
of the >World's population in 2100"
Anyone capable of doing a little extrapolation can see that this is true.
So in other words the UN didn't claim anything of the sort. Thankyou.
Precisely - they did not give the conclusion he claimed. I'm sure that a White
Supremacist could do sufficient stroking on some poorly done extrapolation to
support the White Supremacist site, but the UN clearly does not indicate any
such conclusion.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
10 Dec 2004 08:48:27 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041209080357.08281.00002183@mb-m04.aol.com...
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205102115.06439.00001442@mb-m18.aol.com...
Liberals are frustrated at the inability to prove the posted stats
wrong,
so
they resort to name calling and >>>disinformation.
So you can't cite a source that isn't tied >>into one of your racist
groups
then?
Obviously not,
I'm really starting to think that you people are all a bunch of
brainless
zombies.
I posted the UN info, Dee posted a link to the US Census, the truth is
you
won't believe anything that isn't already >>in your heads.
....
Where exactly did either of those sites >indicate that... "Whites will be
3%
of the >World's population in 2100"
Anyone capable of doing a little >>>extrapolation can see that this is
true.
So in other words the UN didn't claim >>anything of the sort. Thankyou.
Precisely - they did not give the >conclusion he claimed.
LOL!!! Two people with their heads deeping implanted in the sand.
The data are very cleary, shrinking European populations, rapidly growing
numbers of Asia, Blakc and Latin American peoples.
You people ae either very stupid, or just afraid of the truth. I suspect the
latter.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
10 Dec 2004 09:11:19 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041210094827.16189.00001848@mb-m02.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041209080357.08281.00002183@mb-m04.aol.com...
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205102115.06439.00001442@mb-m18.aol.com...
Liberals are frustrated at the inability to prove the posted
stats
wrong,
so
they resort to name calling and >>>disinformation.
So you can't cite a source that isn't tied >>into one of your
racist
groups
then?
Obviously not,
I'm really starting to think that you people are all a bunch of
brainless
zombies.
I posted the UN info, Dee posted a link to the US Census, the truth
is
you
won't believe anything that isn't already >>in your heads.
....
Where exactly did either of those sites >indicate that... "Whites
will be
3%
of the >World's population in 2100"
Anyone capable of doing a little >>>extrapolation can see that this is
true.
So in other words the UN didn't claim >>anything of the sort. Thankyou.
Precisely - they did not give the >conclusion he claimed.
LOL!!! Two people with their heads deeping implanted in the sand.
The data are very cleary, shrinking European populations, rapidly growing
numbers of Asia, Blakc and Latin American peoples.
You people ae either very stupid, or just afraid of the truth. I suspect
the
latter.
thta's very charitable, most people suspect the former about you.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
10 Dec 2004 09:12:48 AM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041209080357.08281.00002183@mb-m04.aol.com...
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205102115.06439.00001442@mb-m18.aol.com...
Liberals are frustrated at the inability to prove the posted stats
wrong,
so
they resort to name calling and >>>disinformation.
So you can't cite a source that isn't tied >>into one of your racist
groups
then?
Obviously not,
I'm really starting to think that you people are all a bunch of
brainless
zombies.
I posted the UN info, Dee posted a link to the US Census, the truth is
you
won't believe anything that isn't already >>in your heads.
....
Where exactly did either of those sites >indicate that... "Whites will be
3%
of the >World's population in 2100"
Anyone capable of doing a little >>>extrapolation can see that this is
true.
So in other words the UN didn't claim >>anything of the sort. Thankyou.
Precisely - they did not give the >conclusion he claimed.
LOL!!! Two people with their heads deeping implanted in the sand.
The data are very cleary, shrinking European populations, rapidly growing
numbers of Asia, Blakc and Latin American peoples.
You people ae either very stupid, or just afraid of the truth. I suspect the
latter.
It's really very simple, where you see (sub-human) Asians, Blacks and
Latinos... I see humans.
I reserve my disdain for historically dangerous nutters who distinguish
by race, colour and creed. I favour meritocracy based on content rather
than appearance.
Psychologically speaking, people like you usually have self-worth
issues. Your attitudes are often found in frustrated little people...
and I don't mean a leprechauns.
-A
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
10 Dec 2004 09:53:48 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero
It's really very simple, where you see >(sub-human) Asians, Blacks and
Latinos... I see humans.
So do I, but I also see people that do not want to live in a Western culture,
they want to change it because they hate it.
I favour meritocracy based on content >rather than appearance.
I think you just might change your mind when you see what that content brings
to your homeland soon.
Psychologically speaking, people like >you usually have self-worth issues.
And people like you have no sense of history, nor loyalty.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
10 Dec 2004 09:30:39 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero <> drawled pompously:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041209080357.08281.00002183@mb-m04.aol.com...
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205102115.06439.00001442@mb-m18.aol.com...
Liberals are frustrated at the inability to prove the posted stats
wrong,
so
they resort to name calling and >>>disinformation.
So you can't cite a source that isn't tied >>into one of your racist
groups
then?
Obviously not,
I'm really starting to think that you people are all a bunch of
brainless
zombies.
I posted the UN info, Dee posted a link to the US Census, the truth is
you
won't believe anything that isn't already >>in your heads.
....
Where exactly did either of those sites >indicate that... "Whites will be
3%
of the >World's population in 2100"
Anyone capable of doing a little >>>extrapolation can see that this is
true.
So in other words the UN didn't claim >>anything of the sort. Thankyou.
Precisely - they did not give the >conclusion he claimed.
LOL!!! Two people with their heads deeping implanted in the sand.
The data are very cleary, shrinking European populations, rapidly growing
numbers of Asia, Blakc and Latin American peoples.
You people ae either very stupid, or just afraid of the truth. I suspect the
latter.
It's really very simple, where you see (sub-human) Asians, Blacks and
Latinos... I see humans.
Only Blacks are sub-human. Sub-human animals. Monkeys. Bestial, bru
hahahahahhahaahaha!
I reserve my disdain for historically dangerous nutters who distinguish
by race, colour and creed. I favour meritocracy based on content rather
than appearance.
Such meaningless piffle. Don't we all.
Psychologically speaking, people like you usually have self-worth
issues. Your attitudes are often found in frustrated little people...
and I don't mean a leprechauns.
-A
<the "you" here is plural- damn deficient English grammar):
Your paradigm is dysfunctional. This is always dangerous to your
well-being. Or that of your children.
Grantland
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
