For all of the fools who can't face reality. If you ahve a problem
with these stats, take them up with the various governements
(US/UK/AUS/NZ) that compiled them.
Tony
By 1994, most European Union member states had an average 10 - 15 per cent
non-White population, with this figure effectively doubling every fifteen
years. This will mean that, unless current immigration trends are halted, all
of Western Europe will have a non-White majority population by the year 2090 at
the latest, and possibly earlier. These statistics are from the EU's own
official records, Eurostat, in Belgium.
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to the 1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS), 40 per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a White
partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the sexual divide, where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity in the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
(If white women are having black children, then the white race ceases to
exist.)
HISPANIC Immigration SET TO SWAMP MANY SOUTHERN STATES
A 1996 report on population trends in America, issued by that country's
official census office, revealed the full extent of Mexican and other Hispanic
immigration from Central and South America. The report predicted that natural
Hispanic reproduction rates will mean that by the 2005, Hispanics will surpass
Blacks as the largest minority. In that respect, the report failed to take into
account the effect of mass illegal immigration, ad Hispanics surpassed Blacks
as the largest minority group in mid 2003, when they officially topped 38.8
million in number.
From 2020, the US Census office says, more Mexicans will be added to the
population each year than Blacks, Asians and Amerinds combined. From 2019, the
relatively youthful Mexican population will have America's lowest death rate.
According to the census bureau, in 1998 there were over ten million Mexican
children under the age of eighteen. This has led to entire slices of many of
the southern states of America: New Mexico, Texas and southern California,
becoming virtual tiny replicas of Mexico, with the lingua franca becoming
Mexican Spanish rather than English.
White American Decline
The long-term rise in the number of Hispanics, who have the highest birth and
immigration rates in America, will coincide with a decline in the number of
Whites, the report states, predicting that by 2028, the number of White
Americans dying will exceed those being born.
The population as a whole is projected to increase by 50 per cent by 2050, to
394 million, from 263 million in 1995. Although the White population is set to
increase steadily in real numbers, expressed as a percentage of the entire
American population, their numbers are in radical decline: in 1996, Whites made
up 73.1 per cent of the population. That is projected to fall to 52.8 per cent
by 2050.
USA Population Projections, millions (rounded off)
total white %white
2010 298 202 68
2020 323 207 64
2050 394 208 53
2100 571 219 45
(Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series
P25-1130, "Population Projections of the United States by Age, Sex, Race, and
Hispanic Origin: 1995 to 2050". )
CANADA - MASSIVE ASIAN IMMIGRATION
According to Canadian government figures, from 1981 to 1991, 74 per cent of all
legal immigrants to Canada came from non-White countries. During this time
there were 1.3 million legal immigrants: 26 per cent came from Europe; 47 per
cent came from Asia (Chinese is the fastest-growing mother tongue in Canada);
12 per cent from South America or the Caribbean; 9 per cent from North and
Central America, and 6 per cent from Africa.
Due to declining White birth rates - in 1997 the birth rate was 1.67 children
born per woman, (less than the replacement rate of 2.1) the Canadian government
formally decided in the 1980s to actively seek out further immigrants. The top
ten source countries (in order) in 1995, were Hong Kong, India, the
Philippines, China, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, England, the
United States, and Pakistan.
In 1997, Amerinds officially made up three per cent of the population
(865,400), while officially Blacks made up two per cent (576,920). The
established Asian population was swelled by 962,000 immigrants in the 1980s -
pushing the total of Asians well over the 2,8 million mark.
These are all official figures of legal immigrants: illegal immigration always
shadows legal immigration, and it is possible that the actual figures may be
nearly double the legal ones.
Given that the total population of Canada in 1996 was 28,846,761, some three
million or more legal non-White immigrants have settled in that country prior
to the year 2000. In terms of illegal immigrants, the number is of course far
higher. All this translates to a non-White population of just under 5 million -
or 17 percent of the total population - in 1996. This figure is set to increase
exponentially.
AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND - ASIAN AND MIDDLE EASTERN INFLUX
Prior to the 1970s, virtually all immigration to Australia was White: however,
like the rest of Europe and North America, the last 25 years of the 20th
century has seen a massive increase in non-White immigration into Australia,
mostly from Asian countries.
According to the 1991 census, Australia had a population of 16,849,496. The
1995 estimated population, including Christmas Island, Cocos Islands, and
Norfolk Island, was 18,338,000.
Australia's total population grew at an annual rate of about 1.4 percent in the
early 1990s. The principal reasons for this growth were the continued high
level of immigration and the associated increase in the numbers of younger
people in the childbearing and childrearing age groups.
AUSTRALIA 27% ASIAN BY 2025
White Decline - from 30% of World's Population to 15% in 2000
The massive increases in the world's total non-White population also makes
serious food for thought: in 1900, the earth's population stood at 1,625
million, with some 485 million being White. This meant that some 30 per cent of
the earth's population was White at the beginning of the 20th century.
In the year 2000, the earth's population will stand at around 6,095 million,
with around 953 million being White. Although this is an increase, in terms of
the total planet's population, it marks a drop of over 50 per cent - in 2000,
Whites will make up only 15 per cent of the earth's population.
The exponential and explosive growth of the non-White population of the earth -
which effectively doubles itself every 34 years -(compared with White
population which now only doubles itself every 200 years), means that by the
year 2100, only three per cent of the earth's population will be White.
.
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 08:49:31 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS), 40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a White
partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
Do you consider this 'racial mixing' a bad thing then?
(If white women are having black children, then the white race ceases to
exist.)
So what? it won't be a 'black race' either, who cares apart from filthy
racist bastards like you?
White American Decline
Blame yourself if you hadn't ruined your manhood by steroid abuse you could
have had more than 2 kids, or do you expect everyone else to do the work?
You're a filthy racist scumbag
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 08:58:01 AM |
|
|
Krib" krib@address.invalid
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS), 40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a White
partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
(If white women are having black >>children, then the white race ceases to
exist.)
So what? it won't be a 'black race' either, >who cares
It sure won't be the white race, now will it?
All of you boobs try to laugh it off, but the stats show that I am right once
again when I say that the white race is dying out, something you all have tried
to deny.
And as I have said before, if it were any other race that was faced with
extiction within 100 years, there would be an uproar from all corners of the
world, especially from white Liberals.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 09:07:59 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205095801.06439.00001432@mb-m18.aol.com...
So what? it won't be a 'black race' either, >who cares
It sure won't be the white race, now will it?
Well done braindead you figured that out all by your dumb self. I'll ask
again for the slow witted, so what? it won't be a black race *either*, why
are you whining about it when you pretend you're not a racist pig?
All of you boobs try to laugh it off, but the stats show that I am right
once
again when I say that the white race is dying out, something you all have
tried
to deny.
I don't care, only scum like you care. The fact is humanity wasn't born
"white"
and it will change as time passes, only filth like you that think your
precious
"white race" is superior to everyone else care enough to whine about it.
And as I have said before, if it were any other race that was faced with
extiction within 100 years, there would be an uproar from all corners of
the
world, especially from white Liberals.
Who knows, the "white race" is not under threat from extinction by any
means,
you're looking at a snapshot of the here and now and assuming your
projection
is accurate, I don't believe it is, it just gives you a chance to rant
impotently
on APN about one of your fave subjects.
WTF are *you* doing about it then filth? do you really believe displaying
your
ignorance and stupidity in here is going to change anything? what has your
racist filth got to do with this group anyway scumbag.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 09:16:22 AM |
|
|
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid>
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205095801.06439.00001432@mb-m18.aol.com...
So what? it won't be a 'black race' either, >who cares
It sure won't be the white race, now will >>it?
Well done
Yes, it was rather well done.
All of you boobs try to laugh it off, but >>the stats show that I am right
once again when I say that the white >>race is dying out, something you all
have tried to deny.
I don't care,
Of course you don't, you're a self lothing Liberal who fantasizes about being
forced to bow down and pray to Mecca.
And as I have said before, if it were any other race that was faced with
extiction within 100 years, there would be an uproar from all corners of
the
world, especially from white Liberals.
Who knows, the "white race" is not under >threat from extinction by any
means,
Wrong. All projecuions by various governments confirm the same result.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 10:55:28 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205101622.06439.00001439@mb-m18.aol.com...
Well done
Yes, it was rather well done.
Oh dear, still relying on your cut and paste stupidity to avoid conflict ;0)
All of you boobs try to laugh it off, but >>the stats show that I am
right
once again when I say that the white >>race is dying out, something you
all
have tried to deny.
I don't care,
Of course you don't, you're a self lothing Liberal who fantasizes about
being
forced to bow down and pray to Mecca.
Wrong again fatso, your stupidity relation to reality but it is
amusing to see the hate fantasies of a racist in action. Like I said, only
filthy scum like you worry about this crap, your fear and hatred of
ethnic minorities drives you to make such a twat of yourself.
Who knows, the "white race" is not under >threat from extinction by any
means,
Wrong. All projecuions by various governments confirm the same result.
Well then ***** let's see some links to this data from the governments
themselves, before they're sieved through the race hate sites and group
you're so fond of... well?
--
krib
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 11:10:03 AM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
Wrong. All projecuions by various governments confirm the same result.
Tony
Well cite the links please Mr Racist.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "victor" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
06 Dec 2004 06:29:45 PM |
|
|
I won't defend Tony's motives. I don't consider racial mixing as bad.
There could be sources which come up with close to what the above
article did. If people have time, here are the search words:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=projections+of+white+race+percentage
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
07 Dec 2004 07:20:29 PM |
|
|
"victor" <christisnotdore@yahoo.com> wrote:
I won't defend Tony's motives. I don't consider racial mixing as bad.
There could be sources which come up with close to what the above
article did. If people have time, here are the search words:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=projections+of+white+race+percentage
Fucking queer. Dirty Dee queer. Homosodomist. Fag.
W~
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
06 Dec 2004 06:48:30 PM |
|
|
victor wrote:
I won't defend Tony's motives. I don't consider racial mixing as bad.
There could be sources which come up with close to what the above
article did. If people have time, here are the search words:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=projections+of+white+race+percentage
Da Drone o' sociology at Harvard argues dat pales will still be in da
majority in da USA circa 2100.
http://www.racematters.org/racebythenumbers.htm
Excerpt:
==>
In any case, the suggestion that the white population of America is fast
on the way to becoming a minority is a gross distortion. Even if we view
only the non-Hispanic white population, whites remain a robust 69.1
percent of the total population of the nation. If we include Hispanic
whites, as we should, whites constitute 75.14 percent of the total
population, down by only 5 percent from the 1990 census. And this does
not take account of the 6.8 million people who identified in the census
with "two or more races," 80 percent of whom listed white as one of
these races.
Even with the most liberal of assumptions, there is no possibility that
whites will become a minority in this nation in this century. The most
recent census projections indicate that whites will constitute 74.8
percent of the total population in 2050, and that non-Hispanic whites
will still be 52.8 percent of the total. And when we make certain
realistic sociological assumptions about which groups the future progeny
of Hispanic whites, mixed couples and descendants of people now
acknowledging two or more races are likely to identify with, there is
every reason to believe that the non-Hispanic white population will
remain a substantial majority and possibly even grow as a portion of the
population.
<==
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
08 Dec 2004 06:01:20 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero
wrote:
Da Drone o' sociology at Harvard argues >dat pales will still be in da
majority in da USA circa 2100.
He's out of touch with reality.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
06 Dec 2004 07:09:22 PM |
|
|
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
victor wrote:
I won't defend Tony's motives. I don't consider racial mixing as bad.
There could be sources which come up with close to what the above
article did. If people have time, here are the search words:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=projections+of+white+race+perce
ntage
Da Drone o' sociology at Harvard argues dat pales will still be in da
majority in da USA circa 2100.
Is there a server to reverse-jive that? I get the general idea
of your sentence, but some specific words may have been changed.
That is, be dair some serva' t' reverse-jive dat? I git da damn
general brainstorm o' yo' sentence, but some kinda' specific words
may have been changed.
http://www.racematters.org/racebythenumbers.htm
Excerpt:
==>
In any case, the suggestion that the white population of America is fast
on the way to becoming a minority is a gross distortion. Even if we view
only the non-Hispanic white population, whites remain a robust 69.1
percent of the total population of the nation. If we include Hispanic
whites, as we should, whites constitute 75.14 percent of the total
population, down by only 5 percent from the 1990 census. And this does
not take account of the 6.8 million people who identified in the census
with "two or more races," 80 percent of whom listed white as one of
these races.
Even with the most liberal of assumptions, there is no possibility that
whites will become a minority in this nation in this century. The most
recent census projections indicate that whites will constitute 74.8
percent of the total population in 2050, and that non-Hispanic whites
will still be 52.8 percent of the total. And when we make certain
realistic sociological assumptions about which groups the future progeny
of Hispanic whites, mixed couples and descendants of people now
acknowledging two or more races are likely to identify with, there is
every reason to believe that the non-Hispanic white population will
remain a substantial majority and possibly even grow as a portion of the
population.
<==
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
06 Dec 2004 07:23:58 PM |
|
|
R. Foreman wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
victor wrote:
I won't defend Tony's motives. I don't consider racial mixing as bad.
There could be sources which come up with close to what the above
article did. If people have time, here are the search words:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=projections+of+white+race+perce
ntage
Da Drone o' sociology at Harvard argues dat pales will still be in da
majority in da USA circa 2100.
Is there a server to reverse-jive that?
I doubt it but i'll take a look-see.
Would you prefer l33t ???
I get the general idea
of your sentence, but some specific words may have been changed.
That is, be dair some serva' t' reverse-jive dat? I git da damn
general brainstorm o' yo' sentence, but some kinda' specific words
may have been changed.
The Professor of sociology at Harvard argues that whitey will yet be in
the majority circa 2100.
http://www.racematters.org/racebythenumbers.htm
Excerpt:
==>
In any case, the suggestion that the white population of America is fast
on the way to becoming a minority is a gross distortion. Even if we view
only the non-Hispanic white population, whites remain a robust 69.1
percent of the total population of the nation. If we include Hispanic
whites, as we should, whites constitute 75.14 percent of the total
population, down by only 5 percent from the 1990 census. And this does
not take account of the 6.8 million people who identified in the census
with "two or more races," 80 percent of whom listed white as one of
these races.
Even with the most liberal of assumptions, there is no possibility that
whites will become a minority in this nation in this century. The most
recent census projections indicate that whites will constitute 74.8
percent of the total population in 2050, and that non-Hispanic whites
will still be 52.8 percent of the total. And when we make certain
realistic sociological assumptions about which groups the future progeny
of Hispanic whites, mixed couples and descendants of people now
acknowledging two or more races are likely to identify with, there is
every reason to believe that the non-Hispanic white population will
remain a substantial majority and possibly even grow as a portion of the
population.
<==
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
06 Dec 2004 07:45:59 PM |
|
|
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
R. Foreman wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
victor wrote:
I won't defend Tony's motives. I don't consider racial mixing as bad.
There could be sources which come up with close to what the above
article did. If people have time, here are the search words:
http://www.google.com/search?
hl=en&lr=&q=projections+of+white+race+perce
ntage
Da Drone o' sociology at Harvard argues dat pales will still be in da
majority in da USA circa 2100.
Is there a server to reverse-jive that?
I doubt it but i'll take a look-see.
Would you prefer l33t ???
I get the general idea
of your sentence, but some specific words may have been changed.
That is, be dair some serva' t' reverse-jive dat? I git da damn
general brainstorm o' yo' sentence, but some kinda' specific words
may have been changed.
The Professor of sociology at Harvard argues that whitey will yet be in
the majority circa 2100.
So the Jive Server replaced the words 'Professor' with 'Drone'
and 'whites' with 'pales'.
So's da Jive Serva' replaced da damn words 'professor' wit'
'drone' an' 'whites' wit' 'pales'. What it is, Mama!
http://www.racematters.org/racebythenumbers.htm
Excerpt:
==>
In any case, the suggestion that the white population of America is fast
on the way to becoming a minority is a gross distortion. Even if we view
only the non-Hispanic white population, whites remain a robust 69.1
percent of the total population of the nation. If we include Hispanic
whites, as we should, whites constitute 75.14 percent of the total
population, down by only 5 percent from the 1990 census. And this does
not take account of the 6.8 million people who identified in the census
with "two or more races," 80 percent of whom listed white as one of
these races.
Even with the most liberal of assumptions, there is no possibility that
whites will become a minority in this nation in this century. The most
recent census projections indicate that whites will constitute 74.8
percent of the total population in 2050, and that non-Hispanic whites
will still be 52.8 percent of the total. And when we make certain
realistic sociological assumptions about which groups the future progeny
of Hispanic whites, mixed couples and descendants of people now
acknowledging two or more races are likely to identify with, there is
every reason to believe that the non-Hispanic white population will
remain a substantial majority and possibly even grow as a portion of the
population.
<==
-A
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 09:18:09 AM |
|
|
In article <%dFsd.1963$Kg4.144@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS), 40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a White
partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
Do you consider this 'racial mixing' a bad thing then?
Evidently he does. He has posted many times that the white race should remain
intact (read: "pure").
One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale himself to grasp at
the only belief system (white purity/supremacy) that proffers up the idea that
even the white people on the very bottom of the socio-economic scale are
"better" than people whose skin happen to be a different color.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 10:55:29 AM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:REFsd.36051$1u.2524@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale himself to
grasp at
the only belief system (white purity/supremacy) that proffers up the idea
that
even the white people on the very bottom of the socio-economic scale are
"better" than people whose skin happen to be a different color.
Don't you know? fat tone is scraping minimum wage while he moves
boxes around in his dead end job. Still, it pays for band-aids for
loida's rug burns.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 03:01:25 PM |
|
|
In article <54Hsd.1702$wI2.1222@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net>, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:REFsd.36051$1u.2524@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale himself to
grasp at
the only belief system (white purity/supremacy) that proffers up the idea
that
even the white people on the very bottom of the socio-economic scale are
"better" than people whose skin happen to be a different color.
Don't you know? fat tone is scraping minimum wage while he moves
boxes around in his dead end job. Still, it pays for band-aids for
loida's rug burns.
Hey, there's nothing wrong with making an honest living, even if it's at a low
wage. There *is* something wrong with one's viewpoint of earning a low salary
if it results in turning to racism in order to prop yourself up.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
06 Dec 2004 03:21:25 AM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:FGKsd.36608$1u.22805@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Don't you know? fat tone is scraping minimum wage while he moves
boxes around in his dead end job. Still, it pays for band-aids for
loida's rug burns.
Hey, there's nothing wrong with making an honest living, even if it's at a
low
wage.
I didn't say there was, your question started "One might wonder how low he
is on
the socio-economic scale himself..." hence my response. Personally I believe
most
of his hatred stems from his lack of self esteem, his overinflated ego, the
fear of
women, different races, creeds, colours all start from there. This is the
only place
where someone as ignorant of facts and a racist ***** like him can air his
views without the fear of getting his face kicked in.
That's why he wails impotently in here about all the things he can do
nothing about
in real life. Since when has whining on usenet fixed a single political
issue? it's all
about airing his opinion, in here he can get other simpletons with like
minds that
agree with him.
There *is* something wrong with one's viewpoint of earning a low salary
if it results in turning to racism in order to prop yourself up.
My point exactly.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
08 Dec 2004 05:58:15 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
There *is* something wrong with one's >viewpoint of earning a low salary
if it results in turning to racism in order to >prop yourself up.
So you agrre then that inner city black and latino's should stop with their
racist gangs?
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
08 Dec 2004 03:01:04 PM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
There *is* something wrong with one's >viewpoint of earning a low salary
if it results in turning to racism in order to >prop yourself up.
So you agrre then that inner city black and latino's should stop with their
racist gangs?
Tony
echo
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 03:16:35 PM |
|
|
(Woodswun) wrote:
In article <%dFsd.1963$Kg4.144@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS), 40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a White
partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
Do you consider this 'racial mixing' a bad thing then?
Evidently he does. He has posted many times that the white race should remain
intact (read: "pure").
One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale himself to grasp at
the only belief system (white purity/supremacy) that proffers up the idea that
even the white people on the very bottom of the socio-economic scale are
"better" than people whose skin happen to be a different color.
Woods
mealy mouthed hypocrite
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 08:46:15 PM |
|
|
(Grantland) Spat the Words
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote:
In article <%dFsd.1963$Kg4.144@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>, "Krib"
<krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to
the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS),
40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a
White partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the
sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity
in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
Do you consider this 'racial mixing' a bad thing then?
Evidently he does. He has posted many times that the white race should
remain intact (read: "pure").
One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale himself to
grasp at the only belief system (white purity/supremacy) that proffers
up the idea that even the white people on the very bottom of the
socio-economic scale are "better" than people whose skin happen to be a
different color.
Woods
mealy mouthed hypocrite
You're not a white supremacist, are you Grantland? How do
you feel about having a female boss who is black?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 10:33:54 PM |
|
|
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
mithril@iafrica.com (Grantland) Spat the Words
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote:
In article <%dFsd.1963$Kg4.144@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>, "Krib"
<krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to
the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS),
40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a
White partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the
sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity
in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
Do you consider this 'racial mixing' a bad thing then?
Evidently he does. He has posted many times that the white race should
remain intact (read: "pure").
One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale himself to
grasp at the only belief system (white purity/supremacy) that proffers
up the idea that even the white people on the very bottom of the
socio-economic scale are "better" than people whose skin happen to be a
different color.
Woods
mealy mouthed hypocrite
You're not a white supremacist, are you Grantland? How do
you feel about having a female boss who is black?
What's a "White Supremacist"? If she was affirmative I would resent
it. Chances are she would have to be affirmative. Otherwise
noproblem.
G
Grantland
.
|
|
|
| User: "MonsieurStat" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 11:38:51 PM |
|
|
"Grantland" <mithril@iafrica.com> wrote in message
news:41b3dfee.105812169@ct-news.iafrica.com...
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
mithril@iafrica.com (Grantland) Spat the Words
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote:
In article <%dFsd.1963$Kg4.144@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>, "Krib"
<krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to
the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS),
40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a
White partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the
sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity
in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
Do you consider this 'racial mixing' a bad thing then?
Evidently he does. He has posted many times that the white race should
remain intact (read: "pure").
One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale himself to
grasp at the only belief system (white purity/supremacy) that proffers
up the idea that even the white people on the very bottom of the
socio-economic scale are "better" than people whose skin happen to be a
different color.
Woods
mealy mouthed hypocrite
You're not a white supremacist, are you Grantland? How do
you feel about having a female boss who is black?
What's a "White Supremacist"? If she was affirmative I would resent
it. Chances are she would have to be affirmative. Otherwise
noproblem.
See Gartland is a good guy. He just doesn't like Nazis, be them Jews, Blacks,
or women.
Stat.
G
Grantland
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
06 Dec 2004 12:24:23 AM |
|
|
"MonsieurStat" <Monsieurstat@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Grantland" <mithril@iafrica.com> wrote in message
news:41b3dfee.105812169@ct-news.iafrica.com...
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
mithril@iafrica.com (Grantland) Spat the Words
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote:
In article <%dFsd.1963$Kg4.144@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>, "Krib"
<krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to
the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS),
40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a
White partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the
sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity
in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
Do you consider this 'racial mixing' a bad thing then?
Evidently he does. He has posted many times that the white race should
remain intact (read: "pure").
One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale himself to
grasp at the only belief system (white purity/supremacy) that proffers
up the idea that even the white people on the very bottom of the
socio-economic scale are "better" than people whose skin happen to be a
different color.
Woods
mealy mouthed hypocrite
You're not a white supremacist, are you Grantland? How do
you feel about having a female boss who is black?
What's a "White Supremacist"? If she was affirmative I would resent
it. Chances are she would have to be affirmative. Otherwise
noproblem.
See Gartland is a good guy. He just doesn't like Nazis, be them Jews, Blacks,
or women.
Stat.
Are you drunk again?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
05 Dec 2004 11:39:31 PM |
|
|
(Grantland) Spat the Words
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
(Grantland) Spat the Words
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote:
In article <%dFsd.1963$Kg4.144@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>, "Krib"
<krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to
the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS),
40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a
White partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the
sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity
in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
Do you consider this 'racial mixing' a bad thing then?
Evidently he does. He has posted many times that the white race should
remain intact (read: "pure").
One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale himself to
grasp at the only belief system (white purity/supremacy) that proffers
up the idea that even the white people on the very bottom of the
socio-economic scale are "better" than people whose skin happen to be a
different color.
Woods
mealy mouthed hypocrite
You're not a white supremacist, are you Grantland? How do
you feel about having a female boss who is black?
What's a "White Supremacist"? If she was affirmative I would resent
it. Chances are she would have to be affirmative. Otherwise
noproblem.
What do you mean by affirmative?
G
Grantland
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
06 Dec 2004 12:25:24 AM |
|
|
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
mithril@iafrica.com (Grantland) Spat the Words
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
mithril@iafrica.com (Grantland) Spat the Words
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote:
In article <%dFsd.1963$Kg4.144@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>, "Krib"
<krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to
the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS),
40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a
White partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the
sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity
in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
Do you consider this 'racial mixing' a bad thing then?
Evidently he does. He has posted many times that the white race should
remain intact (read: "pure").
One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale himself to
grasp at the only belief system (white purity/supremacy) that proffers
up the idea that even the white people on the very bottom of the
socio-economic scale are "better" than people whose skin happen to be a
different color.
Woods
mealy mouthed hypocrite
You're not a white supremacist, are you Grantland? How do
you feel about having a female boss who is black?
What's a "White Supremacist"? If she was affirmative I would resent
it. Chances are she would have to be affirmative. Otherwise
noproblem.
What do you mean by affirmative?
d'oh
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
06 Dec 2004 03:55:07 AM |
|
|
Grantland wrote:
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
mithril@iafrica.com (Grantland) Spat the Words
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
mithril@iafrica.com (Grantland) Spat the Words
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote:
In article <%dFsd.1963$Kg4.144@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>, "Krib"
<krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to
the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS),
40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a
White partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the
sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity
in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
Do you consider this 'racial mixing' a bad thing then?
Evidently he does. He has posted many times that the white race should
remain intact (read: "pure").
One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale himself to
grasp at the only belief system (white purity/supremacy) that proffers
up the idea that even the white people on the very bottom of the
socio-economic scale are "better" than people whose skin happen to be a
different color.
Woods
mealy mouthed hypocrite
You're not a white supremacist, are you Grantland? How do
you feel about having a female boss who is black?
What's a "White Supremacist"? If she was affirmative I would resent
it. Chances are she would have to be affirmative. Otherwise
noproblem.
What do you mean by affirmative?
An active effort (as through legislation) to improve the employment or
educational opportunities of members of minority groups or women.
d'oh
.
|
|
|
| User: "MonsieurStat" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
06 Dec 2004 06:19:10 PM |
|
|
"Absolute Zero" <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cp1a71$in6$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk...
Grantland wrote:
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
mithril@iafrica.com (Grantland) Spat the Words
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
mithril@iafrica.com (Grantland) Spat the Words
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote:
In article <%dFsd.1963$Kg4.144@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>, "Krib"
<krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to
the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS),
40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a
White partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the
sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity
in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
Do you consider this 'racial mixing' a bad thing then?
Evidently he does. He has posted many times that the white race
should
remain intact (read: "pure").
One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale himself to
grasp at the only belief system (white purity/supremacy) that
proffers
up the idea that even the white people on the very bottom of the
socio-economic scale are "better" than people whose skin happen to be
a
different color.
Woods
mealy mouthed hypocrite
You're not a white supremacist, are you Grantland? How do
you feel about having a female boss who is black?
What's a "White Supremacist"? If she was affirmative I would resent
it. Chances are she would have to be affirmative. Otherwise
noproblem.
What do you mean by affirmative?
An active effort (as through legislation) to improve the employment or
educational opportunities of members of minority groups or women.
Or "Positive Discrimination" in the land of Double Speak.
Stat.
d'oh
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
06 Dec 2004 08:23:57 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
mithril@iafrica.com (Grantland) Spat the Words
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
mithril@iafrica.com (Grantland) Spat the Words
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote:
In article <%dFsd.1963$Kg4.144@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>, "Krib"
<krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to
the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS),
40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a
White partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the
sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity
in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
Do you consider this 'racial mixing' a bad thing then?
Evidently he does. He has posted many times that the white race should
remain intact (read: "pure").
One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale himself to
grasp at the only belief system (white purity/supremacy) that proffers
up the idea that even the white people on the very bottom of the
socio-economic scale are "better" than people whose skin happen to be a
different color.
Woods
mealy mouthed hypocrite
You're not a white supremacist, are you Grantland? How do
you feel about having a female boss who is black?
What's a "White Supremacist"? If she was affirmative I would resent
it. Chances are she would have to be affirmative. Otherwise
noproblem.
What do you mean by affirmative?
An active effort (as through legislation) to improve the employment or
educational opportunities of members of minority groups or women.
spin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Whites will be 3% of the World's population in 2100 |
06 Dec 2004 08:49:12 AM |
|
|
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
mithril@iafrica.com (Grantland) Spat the Words
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
mithril@iafrica.com (Grantland) Spat the Words
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote:
In article <%dFsd.1963$Kg4.144@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>, "Krib"
<krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to
the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS),
40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a
White partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the
sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity
in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
Do you consider this 'racial mixing' a bad thing then?
Evidently he does. He has posted many times that the white race should
remain intact (read: "pure").
One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale himself to
grasp at the only belief system (white purity/supremacy) that proffers
up the idea that even the white people on the very bottom of the
socio-economic scale are "better" than people whose skin happen to be a
different color.
Woods
mealy mouthed hypocrite
You're not a white supremacist, are you Grantland? How do
you feel about having a female boss who is black?
What's a "White Supremacist"? If she was affirmative I would resent
it. Chances are she would have to be affirmative. Otherwise
noproblem.
What do you mean by affirmative?
An active effort (as through legislation) to improve the employment or
educational opportunities of members of minority groups or women.
spin
Definition.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
