Wally Anglesea™ wrote:

On 28 Nov 2003 05:44:37 -0800,

Subject:
Re: sollog haters tactics backfire again
Date:
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:30:55 GMT
From:
Wally Anglesea™
<"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>>
Organization:



I'm always seeing this set of one-sided bs whenever the anti sollog
crew run out of arguments or feel they're losing ground in debating
facts.

I've seen these articles and links many times, but if
you actually look into these articles more closely,
you notice the authors of each are biased to begin with and make
it obvious they've done little or no research or are at the least,
amazingly ignorant even though they'd like everyone to
believe they're being objective. As soon
as you question their research methods or check into the other side of
the story, you begin to see how sly or plain ignorant these
so called "investigative" reporters are as they conviently leave
key information out to bias readers and create laughable amounts
of disinformation which sadly most are too lazy and ignorant themselves
to either understand or verify.

In the end these articles are really an extension of this groups most
ignorant and
hateful members, so one need only take this crap with a grain of salt.