WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE?



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "Dr. Blunt"
Date: 12 Aug 2004 05:35:38 AM
Object: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE?
http://www.geocities.com/ufocalypse/misc.html?1092290883390
.

User: " John F Lemke"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 12 Aug 2004 06:49:39 AM
"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cffh5r0148g@enews4.newsguy.com...

http://www.geocities.com/ufocalypse/misc.html?1092290883390

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!
My poor belly hurts.
Please don't drag Jane into this. She's to the right but she's a nice lady.
.
User: "Dr. Blunt"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 13 Aug 2004 09:39:54 PM
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message
news:18OdncdDWfS2x4bcRVn-oQ@locallink.net...


"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cffh5r0148g@enews4.newsguy.com...

http://www.geocities.com/ufocalypse/misc.html?1092290883390



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!

My poor belly hurts.

Please don't drag Jane into this. She's to the right but she's a nice

lady.


Jane's the animal wrangler.
Dr. Blunt -----------------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.


.

User: "Su Zanne"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 12 Aug 2004 07:51:36 AM
That wasn't suppose to be Jane.....was it?
She's not one of the Fab-4-Babs.
DW.....right?
Su Zanne
.
User: "Dr. Blunt"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 13 Aug 2004 07:52:38 PM
"Su Zanne" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:21215-411B67D8-6@storefull-3217.bay.webtv.net...

That wasn't suppose to be Jane.....was it?

She's not one of the Fab-4-Babs.

DW.....right?

Su Zanne

BINGO ! Yep, its dinkwanker...congratulations!
Dr. Blunt ------------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.


.

User: " John F Lemke"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 12 Aug 2004 02:06:13 PM
"Su Zanne" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:21215-411B67D8-6@storefull-3217.bay.webtv.net...

That wasn't suppose to be Jane.....was it?

She's not one of the Fab-4-Babs.

DW.....right?

My bad, forgot about him. And Jane is a nice lady.


Su Zanne

.
User: "Jane"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 12 Aug 2004 05:26:40 PM
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message
news:uY6dnbtpp-ThXYbcRVn-rA@locallink.net...


"Su Zanne" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:21215-411B67D8-6@storefull-3217.bay.webtv.net...

That wasn't suppose to be Jane.....was it?

She's not one of the Fab-4-Babs.

DW.....right?



My bad, forgot about him. And Jane is a nice lady.

Thank you! I try to be nice (to everyone but eric, that is!)
Jane
.

User: "Su Zanne"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 12 Aug 2004 10:02:45 PM

John L. wrote:
My bad, forgot about him. And Jane is a
nice lady.

You had me puzzled! I couldn't see how you thought that was Jane.
And NOW you see how rumors get started!
Usually by men...he he he!
Su Zanne
.
User: " John F Lemke"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 13 Aug 2004 06:24:17 AM
"Su Zanne" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:9483-411C2F55-35@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net...

John L. wrote:


My bad, forgot about him. And Jane is a
nice lady.


You had me puzzled! I couldn't see how you thought that was Jane.

It was early in the morning and I was wracking my brain trying to think of
who the fourth one might be and the only right winger I could think of was
Jane. I didn't think it was her. I was trying to pre-empt the possibility.


And NOW you see how rumors get started!

Even when you're doing something so noble. :-)

Usually by men...he he he!

It's a burdensome thing. :-)


Su Zanne

.



User: "Yazandtony"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 12 Aug 2004 10:45:00 AM
What a stupid, immature site. Just proves that any nitwit can make a webpage
nowadays.
Now, what the hell does this have to do with Nostradamus?
.
User: " John F Lemke"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 12 Aug 2004 02:04:09 PM
"Yazandtony" <yazandtony@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040812114500.04727.00002819@mb-m10.aol.com...

What a stupid, immature site. Just proves that any nitwit can make a

webpage

nowadays.

Now, what the hell does this have to do with Nostradamus?

Nostradamus IS the fourth one.
.
User: "Dr. Blunt"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 13 Aug 2004 07:50:22 PM
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message
news:c4qdndot_aadXYbcRVn-gQ@locallink.net...


"Yazandtony" <yazandtony@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040812114500.04727.00002819@mb-m10.aol.com...

What a stupid, immature site. Just proves that any nitwit can make a

webpage

nowadays.

Now, what the hell does this have to do with Nostradamus?



Nostradamus IS the fourth one.

LOL ! A good guess, but, no, I'm sorry that isn't the fourth one.
Dr. Blunt -----------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.



.


User: "Dr. Blunt"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 13 Aug 2004 07:49:04 PM
"Yazandtony" <yazandtony@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040812114500.04727.00002819@mb-m10.aol.com...

What a stupid, immature site. Just proves that any nitwit can make a

webpage

nowadays.

Well, no, it doesn't prove that "ANY nitwit" can put up a web site.
Further proof is necessary to confirm your assertion. So, if you get your
web site up, I think we can safely say it's true.
Dr. Blunt ---------------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.

Now, what the hell does this have to do with Nostradamus?

At least as much as many other posts here, including an obsessed *****
who keeps harassing Dani in incredibly long threads.
Dr. Blunt
.
User: "Su Zanne"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 13 Aug 2004 10:01:41 PM
http://community-2.webtv.net/tugbertswife/currentconditions/
Gee.... I'm not sure if this helps your case or hurts it.
;)
Su zanne
.
User: "Dr. Blunt"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 15 Aug 2004 02:37:28 AM
"Su Zanne" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:6494-411D8095-162@storefull-3211.bay.webtv.net...

http://community-2.webtv.net/tugbertswife/currentconditions/

Gee.... I'm not sure if this helps your case or hurts it.

;)

Su zanne

They already "know" I'm a "nitwit" so it doesn't matter if I demean myself
or not. Their minds are made up. They're always right. I'm always wrong.
They're of superior intellect. I'm just a *nitwit.* LOL...so I
occasionally like to humor 'em.
Dr. Blunt -----------------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.


.
User: "Tadapope"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 18 Aug 2004 02:30:25 AM
BLUNT I GOT YOU BEAT BY 5 YEARS.
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all 21 universes constantly and at random.
Oh Joy & Lysergically Yours!
Tom
The Psychedelick Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
Saint Isadore of Laytonville
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.




User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 12 Aug 2004 09:31:30 PM
(Yazandtony) wrote in message news:<20040812114500.04727.00002819@mb-m10.aol.com>...

What a stupid, immature site.

Bwahahahahhahahahahaha . I say it is ;) Great coding - even from me
who admits he is still a novice at it ;)

Just proves that any nitwit can make a webpage
nowadays.

Now, what the hell does this have to do with Nostradamus?

Nothing.
Comments:
Wow. Photo Shop wonders LOL. ;)
I don't know, but asswipe has me agreeing that all liberals are bad. I
try to differentiate between the left and what is regarded as a
traditional liberal.
Maybe he needs a new corner on http://www.MichaelReport.com/board
called Dr. Blunt's Terrorist Supporting Center? Lol.
Naaaa.. he would be too lucky ;)
He can get his own...;)
.
User: "Dr. Blunt"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 15 Aug 2004 02:34:28 AM
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0408121831.6150005@posting.google.com...

yazandtony@aol.com (Yazandtony) wrote in message

news:<20040812114500.04727.00002819@mb-m10.aol.com>...

What a stupid, immature site.



Bwahahahahhahahahahaha . I say it is ;) Great coding - even from me
who admits he is still a novice at it ;)


Just proves that any nitwit can make a webpage
nowadays.

Now, what the hell does this have to do with Nostradamus?


Nothing.

Comments:

Wow. Photo Shop wonders LOL. ;)

I don't know, but asswipe has me agreeing that all liberals are bad. I
try to differentiate between the left and what is regarded as a
traditional liberal.

Maybe he needs a new corner on http://www.MichaelReport.com/board
called Dr. Blunt's Terrorist Supporting Center? Lol.

Naaaa.. he would be too lucky ;)

He can get his own...;)

If you juggle five coconuts for five minutes without dropping one, I'll
consider giving you a small ad spot on my site to peddle your wares. ;p
Dr. Blunt -----------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.
.
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 17 Aug 2004 06:42:52 PM
"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<cfn3m702gto@enews2.newsguy.com>...

"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0408121831.6150005@posting.google.com...

yazandtony@aol.com (Yazandtony) wrote in message

news:<20040812114500.04727.00002819@mb-m10.aol.com>...

What a stupid, immature site.



Bwahahahahhahahahahaha . I say it is ;) Great coding - even from me
who admits he is still a novice at it ;)


Just proves that any nitwit can make a webpage
nowadays.

Now, what the hell does this have to do with Nostradamus?


Nothing.

Comments:

Wow. Photo Shop wonders LOL. ;)

I don't know, but asswipe has me agreeing that all liberals are bad. I
try to differentiate between the left and what is regarded as a
traditional liberal.

Maybe he needs a new corner on http://www.MichaelReport.com/board
called Dr. Blunt's Terrorist Supporting Center? Lol.

Naaaa.. he would be too lucky ;)

He can get his own...;)


If you juggle five coconuts for five minutes without dropping one, I'll
consider giving you a small ad spot on my site to peddle your wares. ;p
Dr. Blunt -----------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.

Hi Dr. Chump ;)
No thanks *To* your offer.. Your website is not even index on Lexus
Nexus hit-ratings. Your front page says 800 + hits while another page
says 800,000 plus. LOL. A fib. I don't cater to 3 – year-old websites
anyway. I have a theory why no one goes to your website? It is because
it is crap. Don't let me be the judge of this. Let the public. ;)
.
User: "Dr. Blunt"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 19 Aug 2004 07:12:24 AM
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0408171542.3ca84fa3@posting.google.com...

"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:<cfn3m702gto@enews2.newsguy.com>...

"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0408121831.6150005@posting.google.com...

yazandtony@aol.com (Yazandtony) wrote in message

news:<20040812114500.04727.00002819@mb-m10.aol.com>...

What a stupid, immature site.



Bwahahahahhahahahahaha . I say it is ;) Great coding - even from me
who admits he is still a novice at it ;)


Just proves that any nitwit can make a webpage
nowadays.

Now, what the hell does this have to do with Nostradamus?


Nothing.

Comments:

Wow. Photo Shop wonders LOL. ;)

I don't know, but asswipe has me agreeing that all liberals are bad.

I

try to differentiate between the left and what is regarded as a
traditional liberal.

Maybe he needs a new corner on http://www.MichaelReport.com/board
called Dr. Blunt's Terrorist Supporting Center? Lol.

Naaaa.. he would be too lucky ;)

He can get his own...;)


If you juggle five coconuts for five minutes without dropping one,

I'll

consider giving you a small ad spot on my site to peddle your wares.

;p

Dr. Blunt -----------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.


Hi Dr. Chump ;)

No thanks *To* your offer.. Your website is not even index on Lexus
Nexus hit-ratings. Your front page says 800 + hits while another page
says 800,000 plus. LOL. A fib. I don't cater to 3 - year-old websites
anyway. I have a theory why no one goes to your website? It is because
it is crap. Don't let me be the judge of this. Let the public. ;)

I do what I do because I love to do it, not because I want people to love
me or to be *successful.*
I'll leave that area of ego stroking and status seeking to you, as well as
your arrogant habit of dumping copious url references into this, and other
NGs.
BTW, it's 2 years old and there are no other counters except on the index
page and it is currently over 900. If you're seeing "800,000" somewhere,
I'd suggest you check with your eye doctor, or possibly, psychiatrist.
Maybe that figure's been popping up in your psychotic dreams about YOUR
site.
Dr. Blunt -------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.
.
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 19 Aug 2004 02:47:05 PM
"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<cg25fb0rhc@enews2.newsguy.com>...

yazandtony@aol.com (Yazandtony) wrote in message

news:<20040812114500.04727.00002819@mb-m10.aol.com>...

What a stupid, immature site.



Bwahahahahhahahahahaha . I say it is ;) Great coding - even from me
who admits he is still a novice at it ;)


Just proves that any nitwit can make a webpage
nowadays.

Now, what the hell does this have to do with Nostradamus?


Nothing.

Comments:

Wow. Photo Shop wonders LOL. ;)

I don't know, but asswipe has me agreeing that all liberals are bad.

I

try to differentiate between the left and what is regarded as a
traditional liberal.

Maybe he needs a new corner on http://www.MichaelReport.com/board
called Dr. Blunt's Terrorist Supporting Center? Lol.

Naaaa.. he would be too lucky ;)

He can get his own...;)


If you juggle five coconuts for five minutes without dropping one,

I'll

consider giving you a small ad spot on my site to peddle your wares.

;p

Dr. Blunt -----------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.


Hi Dr. Chump ;)

No thanks *To* your offer.. Your website is not even index on Lexus
Nexus hit-ratings. Your front page says 800 + hits while another page
says 800,000 plus. LOL. A fib. I don't cater to 3 - year-old websites
anyway. I have a theory why no one goes to your website? It is because
it is crap. Don't let me be the judge of this. Let the public. ;)


Hi *again* Dr. Chump ;)


I do what I do because I love to do it, not because I want people to love
me or to be *successful.*

Tell that to your psychiatrist ;)

I'll leave that area of ego stroking and status seeking to you,

Your site is full of ego stroking ;)
For example:
http://216.109.117.135/search/cache?p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.geocities.com%2Fufocalypse%2F&vst=0&vs=www.geocities.com&u=www.geocities.com/ufocalypse&w=wu%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.geocities.com%2Fufocalypse&d=4CDF0210AA&icp=1
This page says 853,132 page hits. lol. with a breaking news banner at
the top.
So this page is breaking news? lol. It is the same garbage you had up
for a long time. Nothing new.

as well as
your arrogant habit of dumping copious url references into this, and other
NGs.

I do not post to other newsgroups Regularly ( except alt.astrology I
have not posted in a long time) - if it is in a cross post started
from someone else this is not my doing. But we have already
established you as a liar: * 853,132 page hits*

BTW, it's 2 years old

My bad... your site is for two-year-olds. At least they are at the
correct mental capacity to believe your *****. This brings up the
question of a grown man whose mental capacity is of a young child?
....and whose target audience is admittedly for children.

and there are no other counters except on the index
page


Already established you as a liar. You thought I could not link to an
off-linked page on your site without you placing a password protector.

and it is currently over 900.

Ahhhh your ego booster mentality shows in your contradictory statement
above - you are such a liar ;) I know it hurts.

If you're seeing "800,000" somewhere,
I'd suggest you check with your eye doctor, or possibly, psychiatrist.

You think I do not have the ability to see pages that you have
dis-linked. I can. I just did. You are too stupid to password protect
them. Idiot. Anyone can see your lying crap.

Maybe that figure's been popping up in your psychotic dreams about YOUR
site.

*is been* ???????????????????? Possessive adjectives are used for
nouns not verbs. So I know you are possessing *been.* which makes you
like others here who cannot conjugate the verbs.
Just like Woods who uses present tense verb as the main and the
secondary verb she uses in the past tense when it is not called for
in the sentence. . Screwy moron.
See above that ******* & *Crap* are some nouns and my possessive
adjectives *your* are possessing these nouns - which are ironically
pointing directly at you?

Dr. Blunt -------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.

Since we established you have a hard time placing your words in the
correct order - here let me help you out. This is really what you
intended to write - I bet!
**Dr. Blunt -------the mentally ill of Usenet serving since 1998.**
Much better! :)
Have a nice day Dr. Chump ;)
.
User: "Dr. Blunt"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 20 Aug 2004 12:58:24 PM
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0408191147.34f34e22@posting.google.com...

"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:<cg25fb0rhc@enews2.newsguy.com>...



yazandtony@aol.com (Yazandtony) wrote in message

news:<20040812114500.04727.00002819@mb-m10.aol.com>...

What a stupid, immature site.



Bwahahahahhahahahahaha . I say it is ;) Great coding - even from

me

who admits he is still a novice at it ;)


Just proves that any nitwit can make a webpage
nowadays.

Now, what the hell does this have to do with Nostradamus?


Nothing.

Comments:

Wow. Photo Shop wonders LOL. ;)

I don't know, but asswipe has me agreeing that all liberals are

bad.

I

try to differentiate between the left and what is regarded as a
traditional liberal.

Maybe he needs a new corner on

http://www.MichaelReport.com/board

called Dr. Blunt's Terrorist Supporting Center? Lol.

Naaaa.. he would be too lucky ;)

He can get his own...;)


If you juggle five coconuts for five minutes without dropping one,

I'll

consider giving you a small ad spot on my site to peddle your

wares.

;p

Dr. Blunt -----------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.


Hi Dr. Chump ;)

No thanks *To* your offer.. Your website is not even index on Lexus
Nexus hit-ratings. Your front page says 800 + hits while another

page

says 800,000 plus. LOL. A fib. I don't cater to 3 - year-old

websites

anyway. I have a theory why no one goes to your website? It is

because

it is crap. Don't let me be the judge of this. Let the public. ;)



Hi *again* Dr. Chump ;)


I do what I do because I love to do it, not because I want people to

love

me or to be *successful.*


Tell that to your psychiatrist ;)


I'll leave that area of ego stroking and status seeking to you,


Your site is full of ego stroking ;)

For example:


http://216.109.117.135/search/cache?p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.geocities.com%2Fufocalypse%2F&vst=0&vs=www.geocities.com&u=www.geocities.com/ufocalypse&w=wu%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.geocities.com%2Fufocalypse&d=4CDF0210AA&icp=1


This page says 853,132 page hits. lol. with a breaking news banner at
the top.
So this page is breaking news? lol. It is the same garbage you had up
for a long time. Nothing new.






as well as
your arrogant habit of dumping copious url references into this, and

other

NGs.


I do not post to other newsgroups Regularly ( except alt.astrology I
have not posted in a long time) - if it is in a cross post started
from someone else this is not my doing. But we have already
established you as a liar: * 853,132 page hits*


BTW, it's 2 years old


My bad... your site is for two-year-olds. At least they are at the
correct mental capacity to believe your *****. This brings up the
question of a grown man whose mental capacity is of a young child?
...and whose target audience is admittedly for children.


and there are no other counters except on the index
page


Already established you as a liar. You thought I could not link to an
off-linked page on your site without you placing a password protector.

and it is currently over 900.


Ahhhh your ego booster mentality shows in your contradictory statement
above - you are such a liar ;) I know it hurts.


If you're seeing "800,000" somewhere,
I'd suggest you check with your eye doctor, or possibly,

psychiatrist.


You think I do not have the ability to see pages that you have
dis-linked. I can. I just did. You are too stupid to password protect
them. Idiot. Anyone can see your lying crap.


Maybe that figure's been popping up in your psychotic dreams about

YOUR

site.


*is been* ???????????????????? Possessive adjectives are used for
nouns not verbs. So I know you are possessing *been.* which makes you
like others here who cannot conjugate the verbs.

Just like Woods who uses present tense verb as the main and the
secondary verb she uses in the past tense when it is not called for
in the sentence. . Screwy moron.

See above that ******* & *Crap* are some nouns and my possessive
adjectives *your* are possessing these nouns - which are ironically
pointing directly at you?



Dr. Blunt -------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.


Since we established you have a hard time placing your words in the
correct order - here let me help you out. This is really what you
intended to write - I bet!

**Dr. Blunt -------the mentally ill of Usenet serving since 1998.**

Much better! :)

Have a nice day Dr. Chump ;)

I've noticed that you frequently have syntax errors, bozo. Here's an
example of many:
Claude you usually never made a grammar mistake. The *a* is far away
from the *i* . so 'is' was misspelled as *as.*
This must mean you got over emotional about this. You are usually a
polished grammatical writer.
Hmmmmm....let's nitpick at you like you love to do to others, psycho!
Claude you usually never made a grammar mistake. [Huh? *you usually
never*? where's the "you've or you have"? Clumsy sentence that would be
more clear had you written:
Clear: Claude, you usually don't make a grammar (grammatical) mistake.]
This must mean you got over emotional about this. [*over*? --no, no...it's
correctly "overly." and other problems here]
Clear: This must mean you've gotten (or--you got) overly emotional about
this.
Pisses ya, don't it? oooops, doesn't it?
Fucking psycho! Jeano shares the same nitpicking trait with you, although
in recent years his temperamental outbursts have not included grammatical
obsessions. I can see why...
Maybe you two should co-author a book...on Bushspeak. ROFL...LMAO...ain't
that, er, isn't that a scream?!
Dr. Blunt -----Serving the UseNUT's mentally ill since 1998.
.
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 20 Aug 2004 06:54:02 PM
"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<cg5e4401h3t@enews3.newsguy.com>...

"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message



Dr. Blunt -------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.


Since we established you have a hard time placing your words in the
correct order - here let me help you out. This is really what you
intended to write - I bet!

**Dr. Blunt -------the mentally ill of Usenet serving since 1998.**

Much better! :)

Have a nice day Dr. Chump ;)


I've noticed that you frequently have syntax errors, bozo. Here's an
example of many:

Claude you usually never made a grammar mistake. The *a* is far away
from the *i* . so 'is' was misspelled as *as.*

This must mean you got over emotional about this. You are usually a
polished grammatical writer.

Hmmmmm....let's nitpick at you like you love to do to others, psycho!

Claude you usually never made a grammar mistake. [Huh? *you usually
never*? where's the "you've or you have"?

*You have* them! :)
*Usually* is an *adverb* Dr. Chump. Do you have something against
using them correctly like I did?

Clumsy sentence that would be
more clear had you written:
Clear: Claude, you usually don't make a grammar (grammatical) mistake.]

Nothing grammatically wrong with my sentence Dr. Chump. Are you having
a meltdown?


This must mean you got over emotional about this. [*over*? --no, no...it's
correctly "overly." and other problems here]

But here you needed the past participle to conjugate with *have* to
make the present perfect - thus you are using another ''adverb''
*overly* correctly in the sentence to make up the cruddy sentences you
seem to write all the time - where as I used *over* as a
prepositional phrase which made the sentence correct and shorter - to
the point ;) Feel better? I didn't need to use *have*. I used the
past tense *got* because I was not here when he posted it ;)

Clear: This must mean you've gotten (or--you got) overly emotional about
this.

Question? Is Bozo the Clown your relative?


Pisses ya, don't it? oooops, doesn't it?
Fucking psycho! Jeano shares the same nitpicking trait with you,

Listen Dr. Chump. I read Jean often and I understand what he says. You
by-the- way have a hard time understand dittly-squat. Look at your
website? No text because you cannot write worth a *****.

although
in recent years his temperamental outbursts have not included grammatical
obsessions. I can see why...
Maybe you two should co-author a book...on Bushspeak. ROFL...LMAO...ain't
that, er, isn't that a scream?!
Dr. Blunt -----Serving the UseNUT's mentally ill since 1998.

See you are still miss-representing your word order. See you have the
problem -not Jean or me. I told you before that you mean to write:
**Dr. Blunt -------the mentally ill of Usenet serving since 1998.**
Now I sincerely wish you the best afternoon Dr. Chump ;)
.
User: "Dr. Blunt"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 21 Aug 2004 05:24:34 AM
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0408201554.7811d80b@posting.google.com...

"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:<cg5e4401h3t@enews3.newsguy.com>...

"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message



Dr. Blunt -------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.


Since we established you have a hard time placing your words in the
correct order - here let me help you out. This is really what you
intended to write - I bet!

**Dr. Blunt -------the mentally ill of Usenet serving since 1998.**

Much better! :)

Have a nice day Dr. Chump ;)


I've noticed that you frequently have syntax errors, bozo. Here's an
example of many:

Claude you usually never made a grammar mistake. The *a* is far away
from the *i* . so 'is' was misspelled as *as.*

This must mean you got over emotional about this. You are usually a
polished grammatical writer.

Hmmmmm....let's nitpick at you like you love to do to others, psycho!

Claude you usually never made a grammar mistake. [Huh? *you usually
never*? where's the "you've or you have"?


*You have* them! :)

*Usually* is an *adverb* Dr. Chump. Do you have something against
using them correctly like I did?

Well, you sniveling psychopathic ***** head, ask yourself why you feel
compelled to continually criticize others' use of grammar here? If you can
answer that truthfully, you'll be on the road to recovery. And, yeah, I
pointed out why I "have something against" the grammatical incorrectness
of your sentences, so obviously your question was already answered. Was
the question meant to be rhetorical?






Clumsy sentence that would be
more clear had you written:
Clear: Claude, you usually don't make a grammar (grammatical)

mistake.]


Nothing grammatically wrong with my sentence Dr. Chump. Are you having
a meltdown?

No, ***** *****, I'm not having a "meltdown" but I notice that all the effort
and energy that you put into crawling around in my web site's files
indicates you're not only just a garden-variety psychopath, but a
hacker-esque sociopath, as well. Congrats on revealing your ugly self for
what you really are for all to see. I feel great knowing I had you pegged
correctly from the beginning. You can't control yourself and limit your
animosity to arguing here, you want to PUNISH and HURT, and that makes you
a sadistic sick person. You need help, sicko. ;p


This must mean you got over emotional about this. [*over*? --no,

no...it's

correctly "overly." and other problems here]


But here you needed the past participle to conjugate with *have* to
make the present perfect - thus you are using another ''adverb''
*overly* correctly in the sentence to make up the cruddy sentences you
seem to write all the time - where as I used *over* as a
prepositional phrase which made the sentence correct and shorter - to
the point ;) Feel better? I didn't need to use *have*. I used the
past tense *got* because I was not here when he posted it ;)

Is class dismissed now, sir? Oh, thank you, I need to go in the lavatory
immediately to take a long hard hot ***** and a humongous crap to relieve
myself of your arrogance and supremism. Do you wonder why you've just gone
through a detailed explanation and defense of your incorrect use of
grammar? It is because you were overly criticized as a child, and were
cowardly in facing physical threats as you grew up. You now attempt to
compensate for this trauma by lashing out, behind a computer at long
distance, at anyone who differs with you, criticizing them for the
smallest of mistakes. Humans make mistakes and you just made a gross error
in judgement screwing around with my website files, and then bragging
about your "talent." You're an institutional-class psychopath and it's
hiliarious, albeit disturbing, that you can't recognize it. It's
transparent in your posts and website articles, in your relentless
grinding at others' (very human) insignificant idiosyncracies. Man, the
paranoia that oozes out your thinking! Jeez! Your idiosynacracies,
however, are far beyond the minor stage. Life-destroying obsessions and
compulsions would be a more applicable description.




Clear: This must mean you've gotten (or--you got) overly emotional

about

this.


Question? Is Bozo the Clown your relative?


Pisses ya, don't it? oooops, doesn't it?
Fucking psycho! Jeano shares the same nitpicking trait with you,


Listen Dr. Chump. I read Jean often and I understand what he says.

Considering Jeano's notorious skewering of the english language, I can
fully understand why you understand him so well. ROFL...are his posts here
a centerpiece for your literary aspirations? Yep! ;p
You

by-the- way have a hard time understand dittly-squat. Look at your
website? No text because you cannot write worth a *****.

Hahahhahahaaaaa....You pathetic dummy, Ufocalypse was ALL text for the
first year. See, fella, I like to try my hands at artistic diversity,
unlike you with your stodgy, corporate-slick site that's devoid of any
creative spark. It looks like it was put together by a little ol'
librarian from Iowa, or a little ol' elementary school teacher. I've
written, under various pseudonyms, articles for underground magazines and
newspapers for over 20 years. I published my own newsletter for several
years. Don't be jealous because you have no intuitive sense of humor or
courage in trying new forms of expression. LOL... ;p


although
in recent years his temperamental outbursts have not included

grammatical

obsessions. I can see why...
Maybe you two should co-author a book...on Bushspeak.

ROFL...LMAO...ain't

that, er, isn't that a scream?!
Dr. Blunt -----Serving the UseNUT's mentally ill since 1998.


See you are still miss-representing your word order. See you have the
problem -not Jean or me. I told you before that you mean to write:

**Dr. Blunt -------the mentally ill of Usenet serving since 1998.**

Now I sincerely wish you the best afternoon Dr. Chump ;)

No, stupid, it's perfectly appropriate, and especially applies to a
psycho-sociopathic turd named McDonald. If you decide to mess around in my
files again, you'll deeply regret it, nut bar. I'd advise you to spit your
venom in the usual venue of Usenet messaging, or use my email box. I won't
tolerate any more incidences like that extraordinary snooping into my web
site. Yahoo's management has been notified, as well as Google's. You have
the modus operandi of a hacker, whether you have done this illegally or
not. The intent is the same. You appear to have no trouble finding plenty
of "justification" in this NG for your personal verbal assaults. If I were
you, I'd wisely stick to it.
BTW, I also have contacted three nerds who have an extensive knowledge of
hacking. It's merely for my own education, not in any way for actual
application. ;))
I've also begun an online investigation into your background. All legal,
of course. ;p
Now, you be sure to have a charming day, bozo! And I fully intend to add
as much as I have time for to help make your days as charming as
possible...but they're likely already quite delightful, anyway. Yet,
there's always room for "improvement."
Dr. Blunt ------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.
.
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 21 Aug 2004 12:40:10 PM
"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<cg77t702ahl@enews2.newsguy.com>...

"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0408201554.7811d80b@posting.google.com...

"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:<cg5e4401h3t@enews3.newsguy.com>...

"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message



Dr. Blunt -------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.


Since we established you have a hard time placing your words in the
correct order - here let me help you out. This is really what you
intended to write - I bet!

**Dr. Blunt -------the mentally ill of Usenet serving since 1998.**

Much better! :)

Have a nice day Dr. Chump ;)


I've noticed that you frequently have syntax errors, bozo. Here's an
example of many:

Claude you usually never made a grammar mistake. The *a* is far away
from the *i* . so 'is' was misspelled as *as.*

This must mean you got over emotional about this. You are usually a
polished grammatical writer.

Hmmmmm....let's nitpick at you like you love to do to others, psycho!

Claude you usually never made a grammar mistake. [Huh? *you usually
never*? where's the "you've or you have"?


*You have* them! :)

*Usually* is an *adverb* Dr. Chump. Do you have something against
using them correctly like I did?


Well, you sniveling psychopathic ***** head, ask yourself why you feel
compelled to continually criticize others' use of grammar here? If you can
answer that truthfully, you'll be on the road to recovery. And, yeah, I
pointed out why I "have something against" the grammatical incorrectness
of your sentences, so obviously your question was already answered. Was
the question meant to be rhetorical?






Clumsy sentence that would be
more clear had you written:
Clear: Claude, you usually don't make a grammar (grammatical)

mistake.]


Nothing grammatically wrong with my sentence Dr. Chump. Are you having
a meltdown?


No, ***** *****, I'm not having a "meltdown" but I notice that all the effort
and energy that you put into crawling around in my web site's files
indicates you're not only just a garden-variety psychopath, but a
hacker-esque sociopath, as well. Congrats on revealing your ugly self for
what you really are for all to see. I feel great knowing I had you pegged
correctly from the beginning. You can't control yourself and limit your
animosity to arguing here, you want to PUNISH and HURT, and that makes you
a sadistic sick person. You need help, sicko. ;p


This must mean you got over emotional about this. [*over*? --no,

no...it's

correctly "overly." and other problems here]


But here you needed the past participle to conjugate with *have* to
make the present perfect - thus you are using another ''adverb''
*overly* correctly in the sentence to make up the cruddy sentences you
seem to write all the time - where as I used *over* as a
prepositional phrase which made the sentence correct and shorter - to
the point ;) Feel better? I didn't need to use *have*. I used the
past tense *got* because I was not here when he posted it ;)


Is class dismissed now, sir? Oh, thank you, I need to go in the lavatory
immediately to take a long hard hot ***** and a humongous crap to relieve
myself of your arrogance and supremism. Do you wonder why you've just gone
through a detailed explanation and defense of your incorrect use of
grammar? It is because you were overly criticized as a child, and were
cowardly in facing physical threats as you grew up. You now attempt to
compensate for this trauma by lashing out, behind a computer at long
distance, at anyone who differs with you, criticizing them for the
smallest of mistakes. Humans make mistakes and you just made a gross error
in judgement screwing around with my website files, and then bragging
about your "talent." You're an institutional-class psychopath and it's
hiliarious, albeit disturbing, that you can't recognize it. It's
transparent in your posts and website articles, in your relentless
grinding at others' (very human) insignificant idiosyncracies. Man, the
paranoia that oozes out your thinking! Jeez! Your idiosynacracies,
however, are far beyond the minor stage. Life-destroying obsessions and
compulsions would be a more applicable description.




Clear: This must mean you've gotten (or--you got) overly emotional

about

this.


Question? Is Bozo the Clown your relative?


Pisses ya, don't it? oooops, doesn't it?
Fucking psycho! Jeano shares the same nitpicking trait with you,


Listen Dr. Chump. I read Jean often and I understand what he says.


Considering Jeano's notorious skewering of the english language, I can
fully understand why you understand him so well. ROFL...are his posts here
a centerpiece for your literary aspirations? Yep! ;p

You

by-the- way have a hard time understand dittly-squat. Look at your
website? No text because you cannot write worth a *****.


Hahahhahahaaaaa....You pathetic dummy, Ufocalypse was ALL text for the
first year. See, fella, I like to try my hands at artistic diversity,
unlike you with your stodgy, corporate-slick site that's devoid of any
creative spark. It looks like it was put together by a little ol'
librarian from Iowa, or a little ol' elementary school teacher. I've
written, under various pseudonyms, articles for underground magazines and
newspapers for over 20 years. I published my own newsletter for several
years. Don't be jealous because you have no intuitive sense of humor or
courage in trying new forms of expression. LOL... ;p


although
in recent years his temperamental outbursts have not included

grammatical

obsessions. I can see why...
Maybe you two should co-author a book...on Bushspeak.

ROFL...LMAO...ain't

that, er, isn't that a scream?!
Dr. Blunt -----Serving the UseNUT's mentally ill since 1998.


See you are still miss-representing your word order. See you have the
problem -not Jean or me. I told you before that you mean to write:

**Dr. Blunt -------the mentally ill of Usenet serving since 1998.**

Now I sincerely wish you the best afternoon Dr. Chump ;)


No, stupid, it's perfectly appropriate, and especially applies to a
psycho-sociopathic turd named McDonald. If you decide to mess around in my
files again, you'll deeply regret it,

Ahh Threats by the NAZI police against freedom of speech.
He dipwade, I didn't snoop - your crap is cache on Google and
Yahoo.com Just type in your crappy website and Viola - It's right
there where I found your crap. ;)
You'er just a moron heh, Dr. Chump?

nut bar. I'd advise you to spit your
venom in the usual venue of Usenet messaging, or use my email box. I won't
tolerate any more incidences like that extraordinary snooping into my web
site. Yahoo's management has been notified, as well as Google's. You have
the modus operandi of a hacker, whether you have done this illegally or
not. The intent is the same. You appear to have no trouble finding plenty
of "justification" in this NG for your personal verbal assaults. If I were
you, I'd wisely stick to it.
BTW, I also have contacted three nerds who have an extensive knowledge of
hacking.

Good I will keep this post for the authorities. Thanks moron ;)
Have a good day Dr. Chump ;)

It's merely for my own education, not in any way for actual
application. ;))
I've also begun an online investigation into your background. All legal,
of course. ;p
Now, you be sure to have a charming day, bozo! And I fully intend to add
as much as I have time for to help make your days as charming as
possible...but they're likely already quite delightful, anyway. Yet,
there's always room for "improvement."
Dr. Blunt ------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.

.
User: "Dr. Blunt"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 22 Aug 2004 02:09:36 AM
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0408210940.75f82dd0@posting.google.com...

"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:<cg77t702ahl@enews2.newsguy.com>...

"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0408201554.7811d80b@posting.google.com...

"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:<cg5e4401h3t@enews3.newsguy.com>...

"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in

message



Dr. Blunt -------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.


Since we established you have a hard time placing your words in

the

correct order - here let me help you out. This is really what

you

intended to write - I bet!

**Dr. Blunt -------the mentally ill of Usenet serving since

1998.**


Much better! :)

Have a nice day Dr. Chump ;)


I've noticed that you frequently have syntax errors, bozo. Here's

an

example of many:

Claude you usually never made a grammar mistake. The *a* is far

away

from the *i* . so 'is' was misspelled as *as.*

This must mean you got over emotional about this. You are usually

a

polished grammatical writer.

Hmmmmm....let's nitpick at you like you love to do to others,

psycho!


Claude you usually never made a grammar mistake. [Huh? *you

usually

never*? where's the "you've or you have"?


*You have* them! :)

*Usually* is an *adverb* Dr. Chump. Do you have something against
using them correctly like I did?


Well, you sniveling psychopathic ***** head, ask yourself why you feel
compelled to continually criticize others' use of grammar here? If you

can

answer that truthfully, you'll be on the road to recovery. And, yeah,

I

pointed out why I "have something against" the grammatical

incorrectness

of your sentences, so obviously your question was already answered.

Was

the question meant to be rhetorical?






Clumsy sentence that would be
more clear had you written:
Clear: Claude, you usually don't make a grammar (grammatical)

mistake.]


Nothing grammatically wrong with my sentence Dr. Chump. Are you

having

a meltdown?


No, ***** *****, I'm not having a "meltdown" but I notice that all the

effort

and energy that you put into crawling around in my web site's files
indicates you're not only just a garden-variety psychopath, but a
hacker-esque sociopath, as well. Congrats on revealing your ugly self

for

what you really are for all to see. I feel great knowing I had you

pegged

correctly from the beginning. You can't control yourself and limit

your

animosity to arguing here, you want to PUNISH and HURT, and that makes

you

a sadistic sick person. You need help, sicko. ;p


This must mean you got over emotional about this. [*over*? --no,

no...it's

correctly "overly." and other problems here]


But here you needed the past participle to conjugate with *have* to
make the present perfect - thus you are using another ''adverb''
*overly* correctly in the sentence to make up the cruddy sentences

you

seem to write all the time - where as I used *over* as a
prepositional phrase which made the sentence correct and shorter -

to

the point ;) Feel better? I didn't need to use *have*. I used the
past tense *got* because I was not here when he posted it ;)


Is class dismissed now, sir? Oh, thank you, I need to go in the

lavatory

immediately to take a long hard hot ***** and a humongous crap to

relieve

myself of your arrogance and supremism. Do you wonder why you've just

gone

through a detailed explanation and defense of your incorrect use of
grammar? It is because you were overly criticized as a child, and were
cowardly in facing physical threats as you grew up. You now attempt to
compensate for this trauma by lashing out, behind a computer at long
distance, at anyone who differs with you, criticizing them for the
smallest of mistakes. Humans make mistakes and you just made a gross

error

in judgement screwing around with my website files, and then bragging
about your "talent." You're an institutional-class psychopath and

it's

hiliarious, albeit disturbing, that you can't recognize it. It's
transparent in your posts and website articles, in your relentless
grinding at others' (very human) insignificant idiosyncracies. Man,

the

paranoia that oozes out your thinking! Jeez! Your idiosynacracies,
however, are far beyond the minor stage. Life-destroying obsessions

and

compulsions would be a more applicable description.




Clear: This must mean you've gotten (or--you got) overly emotional

about

this.


Question? Is Bozo the Clown your relative?


Pisses ya, don't it? oooops, doesn't it?
Fucking psycho! Jeano shares the same nitpicking trait with you,


Listen Dr. Chump. I read Jean often and I understand what he says.


Considering Jeano's notorious skewering of the english language, I can
fully understand why you understand him so well. ROFL...are his posts

here

a centerpiece for your literary aspirations? Yep! ;p

You

by-the- way have a hard time understand dittly-squat. Look at your
website? No text because you cannot write worth a *****.


Hahahhahahaaaaa....You pathetic dummy, Ufocalypse was ALL text for the
first year. See, fella, I like to try my hands at artistic diversity,
unlike you with your stodgy, corporate-slick site that's devoid of any
creative spark. It looks like it was put together by a little ol'
librarian from Iowa, or a little ol' elementary school teacher. I've
written, under various pseudonyms, articles for underground magazines

and

newspapers for over 20 years. I published my own newsletter for

several

years. Don't be jealous because you have no intuitive sense of humor

or

courage in trying new forms of expression. LOL... ;p


although
in recent years his temperamental outbursts have not included

grammatical

obsessions. I can see why...
Maybe you two should co-author a book...on Bushspeak.

ROFL...LMAO...ain't

that, er, isn't that a scream?!
Dr. Blunt -----Serving the UseNUT's mentally ill since 1998.


See you are still miss-representing your word order. See you have

the

problem -not Jean or me. I told you before that you mean to write:

**Dr. Blunt -------the mentally ill of Usenet serving since 1998.**

Now I sincerely wish you the best afternoon Dr. Chump ;)


No, stupid, it's perfectly appropriate, and especially applies to a
psycho-sociopathic turd named McDonald. If you decide to mess around

in my

files again, you'll deeply regret it,


Ahh Threats by the NAZI police against freedom of speech.

He dipwade, I didn't snoop - your crap is cache on Google and
Yahoo.com Just type in your crappy website and Viola - It's right
there where I found your crap. ;)

You'er just a moron heh, Dr. Chump?

If you didn't know that all material created inside a site org., like
geocities.com, hasn't been automatically password-protected, then you're a
moron. But, I suspect you knew this was a fluke, some aberration and
jumped on it anyway, claiming it wasn't password-protected. Your obsessive
hatred is driving you off your little rocker.
Someone posted my site material on Google, either as an inside job or
outside hacker job. Yahoo has already confirmed to me by email that all
material is password-protected. They're investigating how this could've
happened. Google is investigating, too.
What you should've known, unless you're a moron, is that such material is
discarded, dated files and password-protected. Why the hell would I want
my old site pages on Google, out of date, discarded?
Counters can become corrupted from file movement, especially when some
***** hacked into them. How long would it take me to wrack up that many
hits by myself? Over 800,000??? And why would I then have another counter
on my active fresh index page at a little over 900? Hell, stupid, why
don't I try to get that counter up to 1,000,000 or so? LOL...you *****.
Pretend all you want that you're somehow superior, more ethical, more
mature than your adversaries, but when you posted a url to a discarded
page of mine you simply undermined your credibility as a journalist--even
as a moral, decent human being.
I got your number, jocko. And I'll ring it anytime, anyplace, anyway I
want if you want to get down and dirty with me.
And you BE SURE to keep this post for "the authorities," *****-licker,
because all it says is that I am warning you to stop such tactics, and
you'll regret it in an unspecified manner.
Now, you go and report me, Nazi ***** head, fascist-***** *****. Reporting
others, after you incite them, treat them like *****, is not only fascistic
but just plain fucking psychotic, sociopathic.
Instead of reporting YOU to "the authorities," you mama's boy, I'd
recommend a mental health professional do some therapeutic work on your
sick mind.
Have another delightful, charming day in your pathetic arrogant life,
knuckle head.
Dr. Blunt





nut bar. I'd advise you to spit your
venom in the usual venue of Usenet messaging, or use my email box. I

won't

tolerate any more incidences like that extraordinary snooping into my

web

site. Yahoo's management has been notified, as well as Google's. You

have

the modus operandi of a hacker, whether you have done this illegally

or

not. The intent is the same. You appear to have no trouble finding

plenty

of "justification" in this NG for your personal verbal assaults. If I

were

you, I'd wisely stick to it.
BTW, I also have contacted three nerds who have an extensive knowledge

of

hacking.


Good I will keep this post for the authorities. Thanks moron ;)

Have a good day Dr. Chump ;)




It's merely for my own education, not in any way for actual
application. ;))
I've also begun an online investigation into your background. All

legal,

of course. ;p
Now, you be sure to have a charming day, bozo! And I fully intend to

add

as much as I have time for to help make your days as charming as
possible...but they're likely already quite delightful, anyway. Yet,
there's always room for "improvement."
Dr. Blunt ------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.

.
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 22 Aug 2004 04:44:31 PM
"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<cg9grl04qj@enews3.newsguy.com>...


If you didn't know that all material created inside a site org., like
geocities.com, hasn't been automatically password-protected, then you're a
moron.

You do not have password-protection moron for directories. Would you
like to see one? Here click.
http://michaelreport.com/drchump/thechump.html
This is where you keep pages that you do not want people to see
because they are under construction or taken off-site. Your service
does not have this option. This is why anyone can see your crap. When
Google and Yahoo's robots in their search engines grab your pages
there is nothing you can do unless you protect them. That is how I
found your site Dr. Chump.
regard:
When you search Yahoo for *http://www.geocities.com/ufocalypse/* You
get this on Yahoo:
"""index - Translate this page
ENTER
www.geocities.com/ufocalypse - 7k - Cached - More pages from this site
"""
*Cached* term are robots that no one has submitted to yahoo - they are
archived automatically. I'm sure your google/yahoo rep will alert you
to this. Therefore I did nothing illegal - your crap pages come right
up for everyone to see.
You sure are one dumb Dr. Chump ;)

But, I suspect you knew this was a fluke, some aberration and
jumped on it anyway, claiming it wasn't password-protected.

I was correct - you do not even have that service - or you would have
known.
That is unless you are that stupid which would be no surprise at all
;)

Your obsessive
hatred is driving you off your little rocker.

I'm not the one involved in criminal activities and also threatening
further illegal activities like you are. No wonder Jean thinks you are
a retard. Why? Because you are! ;)

Someone posted my site material on Google, either as an inside job or
outside hacker job. Yahoo has already confirmed to me by email that all
material is password-protected. They're investigating how this could've
happened.
Google is investigating,

LOL!

too.
What you should've known, unless you're a moron, is that such material is
discarded, dated files and password-protected. Why the hell would I want
my old site pages on Google, out of date, discarded?
Counters can become corrupted from file movement, especially when some
***** hacked into them.

More baseless claims from a retard. If you have a case Yahoo will
alert you about it - but they will not because their robots archived
your *****. I noticed how you took down some of your site. Nice - looks
like you are having quite a meltdown. Actually you do not want the
authorities to see your libel against me.

How long would it take me to wrack up that many
hits by myself? Over 800,000??? And why would I then have another counter
on my active fresh index page at a little over 900? Hell, stupid, why
don't I try to get that counter up to 1,000,000 or so? LOL...you *****.
Pretend all you want that you're somehow superior, more ethical, more
mature than your adversaries, but when you posted a url to a discarded
page of mine you simply undermined your credibility as a journalist--even
as a moral, decent human being.
I got your number, jocko. And I'll ring it anytime, anyplace, anyway I
want if you want to get down and dirty with me.
And you BE SURE to keep this post for "the authorities," *****-licker,
because all it says is that I am warning you to stop such tactics,
and
you'll regret it in an unspecified manner.

Actually it is *more* threats by what Jean calls you as an
anti-Semite, *****-kissing terrorist. I agree. Please keep me up to date
on what the authorities/google/yahoo say wacko ;)
Have another brilliant day Dr. Chump.
Don't forget to correct your signature ;)
*Dr. Chump ------ the mentally ill serving Usenet since 1998.*

Now, you go and report me, Nazi ***** head, fascist-***** *****. Reporting
others, after you incite them, treat them like *****, is not only fascistic
but just plain fucking psychotic, sociopathic.
Instead of reporting YOU to "the authorities," you mama's boy, I'd
recommend a mental health professional do some therapeutic work on your
sick mind.
Have another delightful, charming day in your pathetic arrogant life,
knuckle head.
Dr. Blunt


.




User: "Cuan"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 22 Aug 2004 11:52:07 AM
On 20 Aug 2004 16:54:02 -0700,
(Michael
Johnathan McDonald) wrote:

"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<cg5e4401h3t@enews3.newsguy.com>...

"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <

> wrote in message



Dr. Blunt -------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.


Since we established you have a hard time placing your words in the
correct order - here let me help you out. This is really what you
intended to write - I bet!

**Dr. Blunt -------the mentally ill of Usenet serving since 1998.**

Much better! :)

Have a nice day Dr. Chump ;)


I've noticed that you frequently have syntax errors, bozo. Here's an
example of many:

Claude you usually never made a grammar mistake. The *a* is far away
from the *i* . so 'is' was misspelled as *as.*

This must mean you got over emotional about this. You are usually a
polished grammatical writer.

Hmmmmm....let's nitpick at you like you love to do to others, psycho!

Claude you usually never made a grammar mistake. [Huh? *you usually
never*? where's the "you've or you have"?


*You have* them! :)

*Usually* is an *adverb* Dr. Chump. Do you have something against
using them correctly like I did?






Clumsy sentence that would be
more clear had you written:
Clear: Claude, you usually don't make a grammar (grammatical) mistake.]


Nothing grammatically wrong with my sentence Dr. Chump. Are you having
a meltdown?


This must mean you got over emotional about this. [*over*? --no, no...it's
correctly "overly." and other problems here]


But here you needed the past participle to conjugate with *have* to
make the present perfect - thus you are using another ''adverb''
*overly* correctly in the sentence to make up the cruddy sentences you
seem to write all the time - where as I used *over* as a
prepositional phrase which made the sentence correct and shorter - to
the point ;) Feel better? I didn't need to use *have*. I used the
past tense *got* because I was not here when he posted it ;)



Clear: This must mean you've gotten (or--you got) overly emotional about
this.


Question? Is Bozo the Clown your relative?


Pisses ya, don't it? oooops, doesn't it?
Fucking psycho! Jeano shares the same nitpicking trait with you,


Listen Dr. Chump. I read Jean often and I understand what he says. You
by-the- way have a hard time understand dittly-squat. Look at your
website? No text because you cannot write worth a *****.

although
in recent years his temperamental outbursts have not included grammatical
obsessions. I can see why...
Maybe you two should co-author a book...on Bushspeak. ROFL...LMAO...ain't
that, er, isn't that a scream?!
Dr. Blunt -----Serving the UseNUT's mentally ill since 1998.


See you are still miss-representing your word order. See you have the
problem -not Jean or me. I told you before that you mean to write:

**Dr. Blunt -------the mentally ill of Usenet serving since 1998.**

Now I sincerely wish you the best afternoon Dr. Chump ;)

LOL!! Have another cup of pee, Ronald. Most amusing.
.






User: "Tadapope"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 18 Aug 2004 02:32:11 AM
THE FOURTH ALWAYS PATIENTLY WAITS FOR THE FIVE BEFORE IT FOLDS DOWN.
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all 21 universes constantly and at random.
Oh Joy & Lysergically Yours!
Tom
The Psychedelick Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
Saint Isadore of Laytonville
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.






User: "Uncle Wallys World"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 14 Aug 2004 11:38:13 PM
"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<cffh5r0148g@enews4.newsguy.com>...
http://www.geocities.com/ufocalypse/misc.html?1092290883390
==============================================================
he he he ;-)
tis Truly Wondrous (& very funny ;-)
yes siree yes indeedy deedy do ;-)
Hooroo ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
===============================================================
.
User: "Dr. Blunt"

Title: Re: WHO IS THE FOURTH ONE? 15 Aug 2004 02:41:46 AM
"Uncle Wally's World" <unclewallysworld@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:a7ef5981.0408142038.71dc2417@posting.google.com...

"Dr. Blunt" <ufocalypse@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:<cffh5r0148g@enews4.newsguy.com>...




http://www.geocities.com/ufocalypse/misc.html?1092290883390


==============================================================

he he he ;-)

tis Truly Wondrous (& very funny ;-)

yes siree yes indeedy deedy do ;-)

Hooroo ;-)

Uncle Wally ;-)

============================================

Thanx ! ! More laughs are coming...the Republican Convention is nearing !
!
Dr. Blunt --------Serving the Usenet's mentally ill since 1998.
===================
.



  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
Sandy is another one who likes ethnic slurs
wmd, usama, who tries him?
Giving Up Those Weapons: After Libya, Who Is Next?
Bush Wants to Allow Illegal Aliens Who Have Jobs (To silnece Mexican oppositon to his Southern Offensive)
Who said 'Mahatma Gandhi ran a gas station down in St. Louis?'
Re: Who really runs the world?
Some Americans who tortured face no charges
Re: Alright, who did this?
Re: Alright, who did this?
Re: Murdering Israeli F...KSCUM (censored by Uncle Wally for the sake of the little kiddies who might just happen to stumble across this post ;-)
Officials suspend boy who wore T-shirt critical of homosexuality
U.S. returns sovereignty to Iraq, those who keep killing Iraqi alliesare illegal combattants or the domestic breed of Islamic bandits who needto get their ***** kicked as well LOL
Revised list of those here who agree with Saddam
Iranian police shoot motorist who refused to stop
Who's Got the Wrong Values Now?