Why are Iraqi's so stupid?



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Why are Iraqi's so stupid?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "TonyZ2001"
Date: 04 May 2004 07:05:21 AM
Object: Why are Iraqi's so stupid?
After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.
But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.
Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.
Tony
.

User: "Ex"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 04 May 2004 01:13:23 PM
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040504080521.25861.00000552@mb-m04.aol.com...

After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.

After this war, all the U.S. had to do was go to Bagdad and capture Saddam.
But they didn't because they didn't want to 'own' Iraq. They could've also
easily slaughtered Saddam's Republican Guards and given any Iraqi opposition
at least a hope in hell of overthrowing him. But no ... it was all left up
to Saddam to comply. Which now, by all appearances, he *actually* did ( or
someone within his regime did ).

But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.

Who do you mean by 'they' ... the common Iraqi's? The U.S. chose to leave
Saddam in power, not the Iraqi's.

Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.

The U.S. undercommitted resources to this project or they were unable to
muster adequate resources without resorting to a military draft. They wanted
to take the battle to the terrorists ( even tho reports now indicate that
most of the attacks are actually from remnants of Saddams elite forces ).
Bush said 'Bring it on!'. They complied and it's now apparent Rumsfield or
anyone else in the Admin has any idea or game plan to win against terrorist
tactics. They're sitting ducks by most appearances.
It was a misguided adventure from the beginning. The Admin was populated
with people who had a strong prejudice against Iraq and possibly others with
special interests in it's natural resources. What little unbiased or
contradictory information was presented or offered was ignored.
The U.S. broke it ... now they own it.
-ex
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.670 / Virus Database: 432 - Release Date: 4/27/04
.
User: "Cuan"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 05 May 2004 07:11:22 AM
On Tue, 4 May 2004 14:13:23 -0400, "Ex" <ex@ex.com> wrote:

The U.S. undercommitted resources to this project or they were unable to
muster adequate resources without resorting to a military draft. They wanted
to take the battle to the terrorists ( even tho reports now indicate that
most of the attacks are actually from remnants of Saddams elite forces ).
Bush said 'Bring it on!'. They complied and it's now apparent Rumsfield or
anyone else in the Admin has any idea or game plan to win against terrorist
tactics. They're sitting ducks by most appearances.

They are inexperienced in guerilla warfare.
"more troops! more troops!" ra-ta-ta-ta-ta-tat! "err...more troops!
more troops!" ra-ta-ta-ta-ta-tat! "*gulp* More troops! more
troops!"
where did they think they were going? europe? russia?
silly bush.
- cuan
.


User: "eric davis"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 04 May 2004 12:47:36 PM
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040504080521.25861.00000552@mb-m04.aol.com...

After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.

Obviously, they did comply, as No WMDs were found. In fact, after the first
few months after the first Gulf war, more weapons were destroyed than during
the war itself. Also, there's no way the sanctions would have been lifted
so long as Saddam was in power.


But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.

Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.

Only those fed a diet of Fox news, NewsMax and WND articles are likely to
believe this.
eric.


Tony

.
User: "Ex"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 04 May 2004 12:59:24 PM
"eric davis" <ericdavisj600@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43Olc.21873$3Q4.538108@news20.bellglobal.com...


"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040504080521.25861.00000552@mb-m04.aol.com...

After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.


Obviously, they did comply, as No WMDs were found. In fact, after the

first

few months after the first Gulf war, more weapons were destroyed than

during

the war itself. Also, there's no way the sanctions would have been lifted
so long as Saddam was in power.


But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.

Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.

I think the majority of Iraqi's were initally very happy to see the U.S.
show up and Saddam captured. There is a growing consensus tho that Rummie
wasn't able to or didn't want to commit adequate troops to complete the
endevour.
As a consequence, U.S. troops have been unable to curb the escalating
violence. It's gotten to the point where the country looks as if it will
collapse in civil war ... and finally, how do U.S. troops combat this type
of violence?? It's terrorism, right from the book. This is what Bush & Co.
said they wanted in Iraq, to take the battle to the terrorists. But, by all
appearances, they didn't have any winning game plan in place.

Only those fed a diet of Fox news, NewsMax and WND articles are likely to
believe this.

eric.


Tony



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.670 / Virus Database: 432 - Release Date: 4/27/04
.
User: "Cuan"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 05 May 2004 07:01:53 AM
On Tue, 4 May 2004 13:59:24 -0400, "Ex" <ex@ex.com> wrote:

I think the majority of Iraqi's were initally very happy to see the U.S.
show up and Saddam captured. There is a growing consensus tho that Rummie
wasn't able to or didn't want to commit adequate troops to complete the
endevour.

i don't think it's quantity so much as quality. i think their CIA
could have been more effective. oh, i forgot - they helped Saddam get
into power in the first place. Seems the USG has a loooong history of
meddling in foreign affairs. Thought they would have improved by now.

As a consequence, U.S. troops have been unable to curb the escalating
violence. It's gotten to the point where the country looks as if it will
collapse in civil war ... and finally, how do U.S. troops combat this type
of violence?? It's terrorism, right from the book. This is what Bush & Co.
said they wanted in Iraq, to take the battle to the terrorists. But, by all
appearances, they didn't have any winning game plan in place.

spread themselves a bit thin, methinks. Bismarck could see that
danger in WWI, and rightfully so. It resulted in his defeat. Even
Hitler fought the early part of WWII on one front. Bush, well, he
counted his chickens before the eggs were even laid. He wasn't
finished in Afghanistan when he decided to wage war on Iraq. He
hadn't even started with Iraq when he hinted that he'd be going after
Iran and N.Korea next. I wouldn't be surprised if Iran is assisting
with the insurgency just to wear down the US's "resolve" to cleanse
them afterwards. Silly Bush.
- cuan
.



User: "Krib"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 04 May 2004 07:18:09 AM
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040504080521.25861.00000552@mb-m04.aol.com...

But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.

As if they had anyway of dealing with such a ruthless
despot as saddam hussein. So why accuse them of being
stupid when they had no choice? I bet if you were in
their shoes you're the sort of fat mouthed scumbag that would
have enjoyed all the torture and murder of innocents.

Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.

The ordinary citizen probably wants just that, after years of
living under that regime they're now having a foreign one
imposed upon them, you think they don't want freedom?
try shutting your idiot mouth and opening your eyes for
a change, maybe you'll get some thought going in that useless
lump of steroid abused tissue you use for a brain.
;0)
--
krib
.

User: "bollogs"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 05 May 2004 05:29:24 AM
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20040504080521.25861.00000552@mb-m04.aol.com>...

After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.

But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.

Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.

Tony

This is a fine example of that American arrogance that you are known
for and hated for the world over. You stupid ***** pantyboy...I bet
you can't even see the arrogance you've just shown! Lets hope that the
Iraqi's send more and more of you bastards home in boxes...and the
sooner the better.
WH
.

User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 04 May 2004 02:01:30 PM
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20040504080521.25861.00000552@mb-m04.aol.com>...

After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.

Past history:
C. 16th Century.
The Sultan of Acheh could have integrated with the Portuguese and
Dutch but he didn't want too. So he called for a Jihad and patronized
the teachings of Islam in his domains.
Look Tony in history the Semetic people were the lest to intermarry
with other cultures. In fact, the Mongols and many Asians from history
did and had no prblem with this. The Europeans had no problem either.
In order to integrate one must allow to have intermarriages. I keep
hearing about Semitic people being killed for, either dating or
hooking up with non-Semitic people.
This has to change.
This is called assimilation and cultural toleration. It is not
happening in Iraq. The bad guys have the weapons and the leaders of
other countries supplying them are scared to death of losing their
power to a global society so they are arming the Arabs terrorists.
.

User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 04 May 2004 06:34:31 PM
In article <20040504080521.25861.00000552@mb-m04.aol.com>,
(TonyZ2001) wrote:

After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.

But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.

Not "they", it was Saddam.


Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.

The army started proceedings against those 6 soldiers back in February for
incidents which took place last year. It's quite possible that a lot more has
been going on that we don't know about, and the Iraqi's are reacting to it. IE
- it does not appear that Iraqis are getting the impression that we're there to
help them.
I know perfectly well that *you* would not take very kindly to someone invading
the US to "help us" and then arrest and torture your brother on what you
consider to be baseless accusations.
Woods
.
User: "Jean Guernon"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 04 May 2004 08:31:00 PM
Woodswun a écrit:

In article <20040504080521.25861.00000552@mb-m04.aol.com>,

(TonyZ2001) wrote:

After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.

But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.



Not "they", it was Saddam.


Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.



The army started proceedings against those 6 soldiers back in February for
incidents which took place last year. It's quite possible that a lot more has
been going on that we don't know about, and the Iraqi's are reacting to it. IE
- it does not appear that Iraqis are getting the impression that we're there to
help them.

Well, this is because of the lies of Al Jazirah and other enemies who lick the
terrorists' asses.
And the Iraqis should be explained the truth.
And not by liars like the Al Jazirah network which should be reformed... or
destroyed.


I know perfectly well that *you* would not take very kindly to someone invading
the US to "help us" and then arrest and torture your brother on what you
consider to be baseless accusations.

Woods

And no Woods, it is not because of 6 criminals that everyone else is bad. But
you see, they will pay dearly as I told you. And yes, if there are others higher
up who are involved, they will be punished also. So far, only 6.
This is not the M.O. of the coalition. And no one who has any truth or moral
fiber in them should allow the behavior of 6 criminals to pretend they reflect
the irreproachable conduct of all the others.
This is not like the Arabs who all support terrorist who kill civilians, this is
6 rogue soldiers who illegally dealt with terrorists illegal combatants.
Your behavior is inexcusable Woods. But it's ok, after all you are easily
strayed by the anti-US losers of the NG.
J.
.
User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 05 May 2004 02:10:31 PM
In article <ntXlc.14744191$Of.2461187@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:



Woodswun a écrit:

In article <20040504080521.25861.00000552@mb-m04.aol.com>,


(TonyZ2001) wrote:


After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.

But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.



Not "they", it was Saddam.


Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.



The army started proceedings against those 6 soldiers back in February for
incidents which took place last year. It's quite possible that a lot more

has

been going on that we don't know about, and the Iraqi's are reacting to it.

IE

- it does not appear that Iraqis are getting the impression that we're there

to

help them.


Well, this is because of the lies of Al Jazirah and other enemies who lick the
terrorists' asses.

Reread what I read - the truth is that these reports have been around for months
and months. The pentagon was denying that abuse was taking place even as it was
investigating the photos that you must have seen by now. That makes it quite
clear that al jazeerah was very likely *not* lying about abuse by American
soldiers. We were lying, not them.


And the Iraqis should be explained the truth.

We are evidently the one in need of truth here.


And not by liars like the Al Jazirah network which should be reformed... or
destroyed.

Again, it does not appear that Al Jazeerah was lying about abuses. They were
not lying about American civilians' bodies being mutilated and dragged through
street.



I know perfectly well that *you* would not take very kindly to someone

invading

the US to "help us" and then arrest and torture your brother on what you
consider to be baseless accusations.

Woods


And no Woods, it is not because of 6 criminals that everyone else is bad. But
you see, they will pay dearly as I told you. And yes, if there are others
higher
up who are involved, they will be punished also. So far, only 6.

This is not the M.O. of the coalition. And no one who has any truth or moral
fiber in them should allow the behavior of 6 criminals to pretend they reflect
the irreproachable conduct of all the others.

As indicated above - the trophy photos of the soldiers involved indicates
otherwise, that this was, indeed, the MO of the prison.


This is not like the Arabs who all support terrorist who kill civilians, this
is
6 rogue soldiers who illegally dealt with terrorists illegal combatants.

Your behavior is inexcusable Woods. But it's ok, after all you are easily
strayed by the anti-US losers of the NG.

I think you need to remove your rosy tinted glasses and take a good look at
reality. You aren't doing the US any favors by making pathetic excuses for the
inexcusable. The best thing for you, for all of us, to do is to own up, hold
those in authority accountable, and make sure we don't let them get away with
such behavior.
Woods
.
User: "Jean Guernon"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 06 May 2004 10:33:01 AM
Woodswun a écrit:

In article <ntXlc.14744191$Of.2461187@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:


Woodswun a écrit:


In article <20040504080521.25861.00000552@mb-m04.aol.com>,



(TonyZ2001) wrote:

After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.

But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.



Not "they", it was Saddam.



Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.



The army started proceedings against those 6 soldiers back in February for
incidents which took place last year. It's quite possible that a lot more


has

been going on that we don't know about, and the Iraqi's are reacting to it.


IE

- it does not appear that Iraqis are getting the impression that we're there


to

help them.


Well, this is because of the lies of Al Jazirah and other enemies who lick the
terrorists' asses.



Reread what I read - the truth is that these reports have been around for months
and months. The pentagon was denying that abuse was taking place even as it was
investigating the photos that you must have seen by now. That makes it quite
clear that al jazeerah was very likely *not* lying about abuse by American
soldiers. We were lying, not them.

So far these 6 soldirers are the only ones who are accused, and they weren't
known to do that by the Pentagon until they investigated them and stopped it.
And they are putting them on trial.



And the Iraqis should be explained the truth.



We are evidently the one in need of truth here.


And not by liars like the Al Jazirah network which should be reformed... or
destroyed.



Again, it does not appear that Al Jazeerah was lying about abuses. They were
not lying about American civilians' bodies being mutilated and dragged through
street.

So what? What they are lying abotu is the rhetorics that the US has no
;legitimacy that it us there as an occupier to take iover the country what they
are lying about is their constant hate mongering that Jews around to rule Iraq
and even that piece of ***** Brahimi from the UN said such a lie that is spread
around by this media.
I don't knwo what youa re talking about. They are constantly incitating
terrorism with lies. This is what me, I am talking about.


I know perfectly well that *you* would not take very kindly to someone


invading

the US to "help us" and then arrest and torture your brother on what you
consider to be baseless accusations.

Woods


And no Woods, it is not because of 6 criminals that everyone else is bad. But
you see, they will pay dearly as I told you. And yes, if there are others
higher
up who are involved, they will be punished also. So far, only 6.

This is not the M.O. of the coalition. And no one who has any truth or moral
fiber in them should allow the behavior of 6 criminals to pretend they reflect
the irreproachable conduct of all the others.



As indicated above - the trophy photos of the soldiers involved indicates
otherwise, that this was, indeed, the MO of the prison.

No, as I say, anyone who has a little knowledge knows that this oes agaisnt the
Geneva convention, and would never take picture of such a thing. These are
ignorant soldiers who thought it was cool to make them suffer the same ***** they
do to Americans. The proof is that only soldiers did that and this was not known
by the officers. And that they took pictures. If they had been doing a covert
operation, there would have never been any picture. Onwe would be crazy to take
picture. You still don't get that Woods, do you?
Nonetheless it is the proof they are ignorant idiots.



This is not like the Arabs who all support terrorist who kill civilians, this
is
6 rogue soldiers who illegally dealt with terrorists illegal combatants.

Your behavior is inexcusable Woods. But it's ok, after all you are easily
strayed by the anti-US losers of the NG.



I think you need to remove your rosy tinted glasses and take a good look at
reality. You aren't doing the US any favors by making pathetic excuses for the
inexcusable. The best thing for you, for all of us, to do is to own up, hold
those in authority accountable, and make sure we don't let them get away with
such behavior.

Woods

I don't see the US make any excuse, they will court marshall the bastards.
You need to put some glasses, rosie or not, with your eyes, presctription, Woods.
J.
.
User: "Ex"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 06 May 2004 01:18:59 PM
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:NUsmc.14889146$Of.2484314@news.easynews.com...



Woodswun a écrit:

In article <ntXlc.14744191$Of.2461187@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon

<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:



Woodswun a écrit:


In article <20040504080521.25861.00000552@mb-m04.aol.com>,

tonyz2001@aol.com


(TonyZ2001) wrote:

After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.

But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.



Not "they", it was Saddam.



Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.



The army started proceedings against those 6 soldiers back in February

for

incidents which took place last year. It's quite possible that a lot

more


has

been going on that we don't know about, and the Iraqi's are reacting to

it.


IE

- it does not appear that Iraqis are getting the impression that we're

there


to

help them.


Well, this is because of the lies of Al Jazirah and other enemies who

lick the

terrorists' asses.



Reread what I read - the truth is that these reports have been around

for months

and months. The pentagon was denying that abuse was taking place even

as it was

investigating the photos that you must have seen by now. That makes it

quite

clear that al jazeerah was very likely *not* lying about abuse by

American

soldiers. We were lying, not them.


So far these 6 soldirers are the only ones who are accused, and they

weren't

known to do that by the Pentagon until they investigated them and stopped

it.

And they are putting them on trial.



And the Iraqis should be explained the truth.



We are evidently the one in need of truth here.


And not by liars like the Al Jazirah network which should be reformed...

or

destroyed.



Again, it does not appear that Al Jazeerah was lying about abuses. They

were

not lying about American civilians' bodies being mutilated and dragged

through

street.


So what? What they are lying abotu is the rhetorics that the US has no
;legitimacy that it us there as an occupier to take iover the country what

they

are lying about is their constant hate mongering that Jews around to rule

Iraq

and even that piece of ***** Brahimi from the UN said such a lie that is

spread

around by this media.

I don't knwo what youa re talking about. They are constantly incitating
terrorism with lies. This is what me, I am talking about.


I know perfectly well that *you* would not take very kindly to someone


invading

the US to "help us" and then arrest and torture your brother on what

you

consider to be baseless accusations.

Woods


And no Woods, it is not because of 6 criminals that everyone else is

bad. But

you see, they will pay dearly as I told you. And yes, if there are

others

higher
up who are involved, they will be punished also. So far, only 6.

This is not the M.O. of the coalition. And no one who has any truth or

moral

fiber in them should allow the behavior of 6 criminals to pretend they

reflect

the irreproachable conduct of all the others.



As indicated above - the trophy photos of the soldiers involved

indicates

otherwise, that this was, indeed, the MO of the prison.


No, as I say, anyone who has a little knowledge knows that this oes

agaisnt the

Geneva convention, and would never take picture of such a thing. These are
ignorant soldiers who thought it was cool to make them suffer the same

***** they

do to Americans. The proof is that only soldiers did that and this was not

known

by the officers. And that they took pictures. If they had been doing a

covert

operation, there would have never been any picture. Onwe would be crazy to

take

picture. You still don't get that Woods, do you?

Nonetheless it is the proof they are ignorant idiots.



This is not like the Arabs who all support terrorist who kill civilians,

this

is
6 rogue soldiers who illegally dealt with terrorists illegal combatants.

Your behavior is inexcusable Woods. But it's ok, after all you are

easily

strayed by the anti-US losers of the NG.



I think you need to remove your rosy tinted glasses and take a good look

at

reality. You aren't doing the US any favors by making pathetic excuses

for the

inexcusable. The best thing for you, for all of us, to do is to own up,

hold

those in authority accountable, and make sure we don't let them get away

with

such behavior.

Woods


I don't see the US make any excuse, they will court marshall the bastards.

You need to put some glasses, rosie or not, with your eyes, presctription,

Woods.


J.

Dude, take your meds.
When I look at the way your replies are pounded out on that sorry little
keyboard of yours, it seems like you're on the verge of a panic-attack.
Slow it down ... five deep breaths ... cool air in ... warm air out ... cool
air in ... warm air out ...
Remember, the worst thing that can happen is that world will go to hell in a
nuclear fireball ... we can carry on arguing who's fault it was in the
after-life.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.676 / Virus Database: 438 - Release Date: 5/3/04
.

User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 06 May 2004 06:16:51 PM
In article <NUsmc.14889146$Of.2484314@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:



Woodswun a écrit:

In article <ntXlc.14744191$Of.2461187@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon

<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:



Woodswun a écrit:


In article <20040504080521.25861.00000552@mb-m04.aol.com>,



(TonyZ2001) wrote:

After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.

But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.



Not "they", it was Saddam.



Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.



The army started proceedings against those 6 soldiers back in February for
incidents which took place last year. It's quite possible that a lot more


has

been going on that we don't know about, and the Iraqi's are reacting to it.


IE

- it does not appear that Iraqis are getting the impression that we're there


to

help them.


Well, this is because of the lies of Al Jazirah and other enemies who lick

the

terrorists' asses.



Reread what I read - the truth is that these reports have been around for

months

and months. The pentagon was denying that abuse was taking place even as it

was

investigating the photos that you must have seen by now. That makes it quite


clear that al jazeerah was very likely *not* lying about abuse by American
soldiers. We were lying, not them.


So far these 6 soldirers are the only ones who are accused, and they weren't
known to do that by the Pentagon until they investigated them and stopped it.
And they are putting them on trial.



And the Iraqis should be explained the truth.



We are evidently the one in need of truth here.


And not by liars like the Al Jazirah network which should be reformed... or
destroyed.



Again, it does not appear that Al Jazeerah was lying about abuses. They were


not lying about American civilians' bodies being mutilated and dragged

through

street.


So what? What they are lying abotu is the rhetorics that the US has no
;legitimacy that it us there as an occupier to take iover the country what they

are lying about is their constant hate mongering that Jews around to rule Iraq
and even that piece of ***** Brahimi from the UN said such a lie that is spread
around by this media.

I don't knwo what youa re talking about. They are constantly incitating
terrorism with lies. This is what me, I am talking about.

The above is pure gibberish.



I know perfectly well that *you* would not take very kindly to someone


invading

the US to "help us" and then arrest and torture your brother on what you
consider to be baseless accusations.

Woods


And no Woods, it is not because of 6 criminals that everyone else is bad. But


you see, they will pay dearly as I told you. And yes, if there are others
higher
up who are involved, they will be punished also. So far, only 6.

This is not the M.O. of the coalition. And no one who has any truth or moral
fiber in them should allow the behavior of 6 criminals to pretend they

reflect

the irreproachable conduct of all the others.



As indicated above - the trophy photos of the soldiers involved indicates
otherwise, that this was, indeed, the MO of the prison.


No, as I say, anyone who has a little knowledge knows that this oes agaisnt the

Geneva convention, and would never take picture of such a thing. These are
ignorant soldiers who thought it was cool to make them suffer the same *****
they
do to Americans. The proof is that only soldiers did that and this was not
known
by the officers. And that they took pictures. If they had been doing a covert
operation, there would have never been any picture. Onwe would be crazy to take

picture. You still don't get that Woods, do you?

Nonetheless it is the proof they are ignorant idiots.

Wrong. The red cross informed the US of the abuses in the summer of 2003, and
NOTHING was done to stop it. We've been hearing denials from the Bush
administration that there is anything to the reports among Iraqis of abuses, all
the while they knew. It wasn't until the media got hold of photos, from someone
outside the Pentagon/Bush Admin, that anyone started to acknowledge anything -
and then it was to feign shock and surprised.
Woods
.
User: "Jean Guernon"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 06 May 2004 06:43:46 PM
Woodswun a écrit:

In article <NUsmc.14889146$Of.2484314@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:


Woodswun a écrit:


In article <ntXlc.14744191$Of.2461187@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon


<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:

Woodswun a écrit:



In article <20040504080521.25861.00000552@mb-m04.aol.com>,



(TonyZ2001) wrote:


After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.

But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.



Not "they", it was Saddam.




Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.



The army started proceedings against those 6 soldiers back in February for
incidents which took place last year. It's quite possible that a lot more


has


been going on that we don't know about, and the Iraqi's are reacting to it.


IE


- it does not appear that Iraqis are getting the impression that we're there


to


help them.


Well, this is because of the lies of Al Jazirah and other enemies who lick


the

terrorists' asses.



Reread what I read - the truth is that these reports have been around for


months

and months. The pentagon was denying that abuse was taking place even as it


was

investigating the photos that you must have seen by now. That makes it quite


clear that al jazeerah was very likely *not* lying about abuse by American
soldiers. We were lying, not them.


So far these 6 soldirers are the only ones who are accused, and they weren't
known to do that by the Pentagon until they investigated them and stopped it.
And they are putting them on trial.



And the Iraqis should be explained the truth.



We are evidently the one in need of truth here.



And not by liars like the Al Jazirah network which should be reformed... or
destroyed.



Again, it does not appear that Al Jazeerah was lying about abuses. They were


not lying about American civilians' bodies being mutilated and dragged


through

street.


So what? What they are lying about is the rhetorics that the US has no
legitimacy that it us there as an occupier to take iover the country what they
are lying about is their constant hate mongering that Jews around to rule Iraq
and even that piece of ***** Brahimi from the UN said such a lie that is spread
around by this media.

I don't knwo what you are talking about. They are constantly incitating
terrorism with lies. This is what me, I am talking about.



The above is pure gibberish.

No. The above is a picture of what the Al Jazirah does. Spread hatred and lies.
But I must admit that something was revealed today which changes things. It sees
that Rumsfled had been told there were rogue elements who abused prisoners.
Now, I don't know what he knew exactly, if he had just been told, for instance,
that there were rumors, and that they were looking into it, or if it is worse.
But it seems that he kept this from the US floor. We have to wait until tomorrow
to see his testimony, and to learn what he knew exactly.
Maybe I owe you some apologies. Maybe you were right, but it's still something
we can't know until tomorrow.
But as for the above, again, that doesn't make the Al Jazirah network any less
the garbage dump it is. Its lies are responsible for lots of unlawful combatants
in Iraq and elsewhere, and lots of deaths. Even if in this instance there may
have been some truth, that will be investigated.
Those who were torturing these soldiers weren't thinking about the gravity of
their actions, if they were taking pics, or setting them free afterwards. They
were obviously ignorant of the gravity of this behavior, and this should teach
the army to insure that FROM NOW ON, all personal knows by heart the Geneva
convention.
Of course, still, if it is worse than just these idiots, as you seem to suspect,
tomorrow we will learn about it. I'd be surprised.
J.




I know perfectly well that *you* would not take very kindly to someone


invading


the US to "help us" and then arrest and torture your brother on what you
consider to be baseless accusations.

Woods


And no Woods, it is not because of 6 criminals that everyone else is bad. But


you see, they will pay dearly as I told you. And yes, if there are others
higher
up who are involved, they will be punished also. So far, only 6.

This is not the M.O. of the coalition. And no one who has any truth or moral
fiber in them should allow the behavior of 6 criminals to pretend they


reflect

the irreproachable conduct of all the others.



As indicated above - the trophy photos of the soldiers involved indicates
otherwise, that this was, indeed, the MO of the prison.


No, as I say, anyone who has a little knowledge knows that this oes agaisnt the

Geneva convention, and would never take picture of such a thing. These are
ignorant soldiers who thought it was cool to make them suffer the same *****
they
do to Americans. The proof is that only soldiers did that and this was not
known
by the officers. And that they took pictures. If they had been doing a covert
operation, there would have never been any picture. Onwe would be crazy to take

picture. You still don't get that Woods, do you?

Nonetheless it is the proof they are ignorant idiots.



Wrong. The red cross informed the US of the abuses in the summer of 2003, and
NOTHING was done to stop it. We've been hearing denials from the Bush
administration that there is anything to the reports among Iraqis of abuses, all
the while they knew. It wasn't until the media got hold of photos, from someone
outside the Pentagon/Bush Admin, that anyone started to acknowledge anything -
and then it was to feign shock and surprised.

Woods

.
User: "Ex"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 06 May 2004 07:22:08 PM
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:S4Amc.14909538$Of.2487184@news.easynews.com...



Woodswun a écrit:

In article <NUsmc.14889146$Of.2484314@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon

<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:



Woodswun a écrit:


In article <ntXlc.14744191$Of.2461187@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon


<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:

Woodswun a écrit:



In article <20040504080521.25861.00000552@mb-m04.aol.com>,

tonyz2001@aol.com


(TonyZ2001) wrote:


After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.

But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.



Not "they", it was Saddam.




Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.



The army started proceedings against those 6 soldiers back in

February for

incidents which took place last year. It's quite possible that a lot

more


has


been going on that we don't know about, and the Iraqi's are reacting

to it.


IE


- it does not appear that Iraqis are getting the impression that

we're there


to


help them.


Well, this is because of the lies of Al Jazirah and other enemies who

lick


the

terrorists' asses.



Reread what I read - the truth is that these reports have been around

for


months

and months. The pentagon was denying that abuse was taking place even

as it


was

investigating the photos that you must have seen by now. That makes it

quite


clear that al jazeerah was very likely *not* lying about abuse by

American

soldiers. We were lying, not them.


So far these 6 soldirers are the only ones who are accused, and they

weren't

known to do that by the Pentagon until they investigated them and

stopped it.

And they are putting them on trial.



And the Iraqis should be explained the truth.



We are evidently the one in need of truth here.



And not by liars like the Al Jazirah network which should be

reformed... or

destroyed.



Again, it does not appear that Al Jazeerah was lying about abuses.

They were


not lying about American civilians' bodies being mutilated and dragged


through

street.


So what? What they are lying about is the rhetorics that the US has no
legitimacy that it us there as an occupier to take iover the country

what they

are lying about is their constant hate mongering that Jews around to

rule Iraq

and even that piece of ***** Brahimi from the UN said such a lie that is

spread

around by this media.

I don't knwo what you are talking about. They are constantly incitating
terrorism with lies. This is what me, I am talking about.



The above is pure gibberish.


No. The above is a picture of what the Al Jazirah does. Spread hatred and

lies.


But I must admit that something was revealed today which changes things.

It sees

that Rumsfled had been told there were rogue elements who abused

prisoners.


Now, I don't know what he knew exactly, if he had just been told, for

instance,

that there were rumors, and that they were looking into it, or if it is

worse.

But it seems that he kept this from the US floor. We have to wait until

tomorrow

to see his testimony, and to learn what he knew exactly.

Maybe I owe you some apologies. Maybe you were right, but it's still

something

we can't know until tomorrow.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *blink*blink*
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.676 / Virus Database: 438 - Release Date: 5/3/04
.
User: "Cuan"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 07 May 2004 06:20:55 AM
On Thu, 6 May 2004 20:22:08 -0400, "Ex" <ex@ex.com> wrote:

"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:S4Amc.14909538$Of.2487184@news.easynews.com...

Maybe I owe you some apologies. Maybe you were right, but it's still

something

we can't know until tomorrow.



!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *blink*blink*

LOL!! :-)
- cuan
.




User: "Cuan"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 07 May 2004 06:17:00 AM
On Thu, 06 May 2004 15:33:01 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:

So far these 6 soldirers are the only ones who are accused, and they weren't
known to do that by the Pentagon until they investigated them and stopped it.
And they are putting them on trial.

scapegoats.

So what? What they are lying abotu is the rhetorics that the US has no
;legitimacy that it us there as an occupier to take iover the country what they
are lying about is their constant hate mongering that Jews around to rule Iraq
and even that piece of ***** Brahimi from the UN said such a lie that is spread
around by this media.

I don't knwo what youa re talking about. They are constantly incitating
terrorism with lies. This is what me, I am talking about.

You're the one who keeps grouping alleged anti-US and anti-semitic
vocalists together under one banner. Now you're saying they're
separate?

Geneva convention, and would never take picture of such a thing. These are
ignorant soldiers who thought it was cool to make them suffer the same ***** they
do to Americans. The proof is that only soldiers did that and this was not known

oh yes. I've heard so *many* stories about Iraqis deriving sexual
pleasure from abusing captured US soldiers. I'll ask Al Jazirah to
publish the pictures.
I can't equate forced sexual abuse to hanging dead soldiers from
bridges, Jean. I'm shocked that you can. An eye for an eye?

I think you need to remove your rosy tinted glasses and take a good look at
reality. You aren't doing the US any favors by making pathetic excuses for the
inexcusable. The best thing for you, for all of us, to do is to own up, hold
those in authority accountable, and make sure we don't let them get away with
such behavior.


I don't see the US make any excuse, they will court marshall the bastards.

He wasn't referring to the US, dimwit.
- cuan
.



User: "Cuan"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 05 May 2004 07:56:57 AM
On Wed, 05 May 2004 01:31:00 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:

Woodswun a écrit:

The army started proceedings against those 6 soldiers back in February for
incidents which took place last year. It's quite possible that a lot more has
been going on that we don't know about, and the Iraqi's are reacting to it. IE
- it does not appear that Iraqis are getting the impression that we're there to
help them.


Well, this is because of the lies of Al Jazirah and other enemies who lick the
terrorists' asses.
And the Iraqis should be explained the truth.
And not by liars like the Al Jazirah network which should be reformed... or
destroyed.

Destroy destroy destroy. Yes, that is the latest buzzword in the USG
and amongst its supporters. If you don't like 'em, destroy 'em!
I suppose the western networks tell everything like it is? Perhaps,
Jean, Al Jazirah is the *only* network who *is* telling it like it is.
Seem to remember the conditions the US military placed on journalists
during 'Iraqi Freedom'. Everything had to be reviewed and sometimes
editted prior to broadcast, under the auspices of not releasing
strategic information.

This is not the M.O. of the coalition. And no one who has any truth or moral
fiber in them should allow the behavior of 6 criminals to pretend they reflect
the irreproachable conduct of all the others.

I like that adjective. "Irreproachable". Man, you're really sold on
these guys. As for the modus operandi of the coalition, bah! How
would you know? You're tainted. Sold. Blinded. Corrupted.
Propagandarised. Spoon fed. You can no longer be objective.

This is not like the Arabs who all support terrorist who kill civilians, this is
6 rogue soldiers who illegally dealt with terrorists illegal combatants.

Generalising again. Your objectivity is screwed. Illegal combatants?
In their own country? You do realise that the war hasn't ended yet,
do you? Besides, these could have been pedestrians on the streets of
Baghdad who looked a little suspicious. Now their lives are ruined -
by infidels. You'd better get your bomb shelter finished.

Your behavior is inexcusable Woods. But it's ok, after all you are easily
strayed by the anti-US losers of the NG.

bwahahaha! What did the pot call the kettle?
- cuan
.
User: "Jean Guernon"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 06 May 2004 10:42:32 AM
Cuan a écrit:

On Wed, 05 May 2004 01:31:00 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:


Woodswun a écrit:

The army started proceedings against those 6 soldiers back in February for
incidents which took place last year. It's quite possible that a lot more has
been going on that we don't know about, and the Iraqi's are reacting to it. IE
- it does not appear that Iraqis are getting the impression that we're there to
help them.


Well, this is because of the lies of Al Jazirah and other enemies who lick the
terrorists' asses.
And the Iraqis should be explained the truth.
And not by liars like the Al Jazirah network which should be reformed... or
destroyed.



Destroy destroy destroy. Yes, that is the latest buzzword in the USG
and amongst its supporters. If you don't like 'em, destroy 'em!

I suppose the western networks tell everything like it is? Perhaps,
Jean, Al Jazirah is the *only* network who *is* telling it like it is.
Seem to remember the conditions the US military placed on journalists
during 'Iraqi Freedom'. Everything had to be reviewed and sometimes
editted prior to broadcast, under the auspices of not releasing
strategic information.

Yes, I wish they would do the same with the Arab netwoerk and sue tehir pants
off for their lies, especially their anti-semite lies, Then we would see some truth.




This is not the M.O. of the coalition. And no one who has any truth or moral
fiber in them should allow the behavior of 6 criminals to pretend they reflect
the irreproachable conduct of all the others.



I like that adjective. "Irreproachable". Man, you're really sold on
these guys. As for the modus operandi of the coalition, bah! How
would you know? You're tainted. Sold. Blinded. Corrupted.
Propagandarised. Spoon fed. You can no longer be objective.

Only in your dreams. I, at least, don't kiss terrorists' bums, (buns?, whatever).




This is not like the Arabs who all support terrorist who kill civilians, this is
6 rogue soldiers who illegally dealt with terrorists illegal combatants.



Generalising again. Your objectivity is screwed. Illegal combatants?
In their own country?

No, illegal combattants are not in their own country dumbo.
Wake the ***** up.
These Arabs from elsewhere do incite Iraqis to fight agaisnt their own
provisional governement though, through lies.
Which make the Iraqis who support them, in turn, allies of illegal combattants.
It is covered in the Geneva convention. They have a bit more rights as prisoners
of war under it than the illegal combattants.

You do realise that the war hasn't ended yet,
do you?

Duh.

Besides, these could have been pedestrians on the streets of
Baghdad who looked a little suspicious. Now their lives are ruined -
by infidels.

Only in your dreams.


You'd better get your bomb shelter finished.

Why, because of your lies? Sure, I know liars will destroy the world in the
future. Nostradamus says so,and we see why right here in front of our very eyes.




Your behavior is inexcusable Woods. But it's ok, after all you are easily
strayed by the anti-US losers of the NG.



bwahahaha! What did the pot call the kettle?

He said go ***** yourself with the potty pot on your head, and the boiling kettle
in your *****???
J.



- cuan

.
User: "Cuan"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 07 May 2004 06:02:03 AM
On Thu, 06 May 2004 15:42:32 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:

Cuan a écrit:

Destroy destroy destroy. Yes, that is the latest buzzword in the USG
and amongst its supporters. If you don't like 'em, destroy 'em!
I suppose the western networks tell everything like it is? Perhaps,
Jean, Al Jazirah is the *only* network who *is* telling it like it is.
Seem to remember the conditions the US military placed on journalists
during 'Iraqi Freedom'. Everything had to be reviewed and sometimes
editted prior to broadcast, under the auspices of not releasing
strategic information.


Yes, I wish they would do the same with the Arab netwoerk and sue tehir pants
off for their lies, especially their anti-semite lies, Then we would see some truth.

Don't give the Moslems any idea's... if they decided to sue the USG
for all their crap, the US would be broke in no time.

I like that adjective. "Irreproachable". Man, you're really sold on
these guys. As for the modus operandi of the coalition, bah! How
would you know? You're tainted. Sold. Blinded. Corrupted.
Propagandarised. Spoon fed. You can no longer be objective.


Only in your dreams. I, at least, don't kiss terrorists' bums, (buns?, whatever).

At a loss for an intelligent response again, Jean?

These Arabs from elsewhere do incite Iraqis to fight agaisnt their own
provisional governement though, through lies.
Which make the Iraqis who support them, in turn, allies of illegal combattants.

those poor poor iraqis. unable to think for themselves. shame on
those illegal combattants. viva US army sex offenders! show them the
light! how moronic.

Besides, these could have been pedestrians on the streets of
Baghdad who looked a little suspicious. Now their lives are ruined -
by infidels.


Only in your dreams.

I don't really think it is something dreams are made of, Jean - at
least not mine. You, however, seem to still be stuck in Fantasia
trying to save the princess from the encroaching 'nothingness'.

You'd better get your bomb shelter finished.


Why, because of your lies? Sure, I know liars will destroy the world in the
future. Nostradamus says so,and we see why right here in front of our very eyes.

you said it. I rest my case.

Your behavior is inexcusable Woods. But it's ok, after all you are easily
strayed by the anti-US losers of the NG.


bwahahaha! What did the pot call the kettle?


He said go ***** yourself with the potty pot on your head, and the boiling kettle
in your *****???

nope.
- cuan
.
User: "Ex"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 07 May 2004 06:21:53 AM
"Cuan" <an@nymous.co.za> wrote in message
news:ptpm90h9uopd4kq9ltdf6lkff4dc6kb99u@4ax.com...

On Thu, 06 May 2004 15:42:32 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:

Cuan a écrit:

Destroy destroy destroy. Yes, that is the latest buzzword in the USG
and amongst its supporters. If you don't like 'em, destroy 'em!
I suppose the western networks tell everything like it is? Perhaps,
Jean, Al Jazirah is the *only* network who *is* telling it like it is.
Seem to remember the conditions the US military placed on journalists
during 'Iraqi Freedom'. Everything had to be reviewed and sometimes
editted prior to broadcast, under the auspices of not releasing
strategic information.


Yes, I wish they would do the same with the Arab netwoerk and sue tehir

pants

off for their lies, especially their anti-semite lies, Then we would see

some truth.


Don't give the Moslems any idea's... if they decided to sue the USG
for all their crap, the US would be broke in no time.


I like that adjective. "Irreproachable". Man, you're really sold on
these guys. As for the modus operandi of the coalition, bah! How
would you know? You're tainted. Sold. Blinded. Corrupted.
Propagandarised. Spoon fed. You can no longer be objective.


Only in your dreams. I, at least, don't kiss terrorists' bums, (buns?,

whatever).


At a loss for an intelligent response again, Jean?


These Arabs from elsewhere do incite Iraqis to fight agaisnt their own
provisional governement though, through lies.
Which make the Iraqis who support them, in turn, allies of illegal

combattants.


those poor poor iraqis. unable to think for themselves. shame on
those illegal combattants. viva US army sex offenders! show them the
light! how moronic.


Besides, these could have been pedestrians on the streets of
Baghdad who looked a little suspicious. Now their lives are ruined -
by infidels.


Only in your dreams.


I don't really think it is something dreams are made of, Jean - at
least not mine. You, however, seem to still be stuck in Fantasia
trying to save the princess from the encroaching 'nothingness'.


You'd better get your bomb shelter finished.


Why, because of your lies? Sure, I know liars will destroy the world in

the

future. Nostradamus says so,and we see why right here in front of our

very eyes.


you said it. I rest my case.


Your behavior is inexcusable Woods. But it's ok, after all you are

easily

strayed by the anti-US losers of the NG.


bwahahaha! What did the pot call the kettle?


He said go ***** yourself with the potty pot on your head, and the boiling

kettle

in your *****???


nope.


- cuan

Since I've noticed Jean's been busy flaming several other poster's responses
to his idiotic remarks ( mine included ) I'd like to give you the standard
Jean reply and save him some time ... here goes ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
WORNG!!!
In your terrositst *****-licking dreams anti-semite!!!
j.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.676 / Virus Database: 438 - Release Date: 5/3/04
.
User: "Jean Guernon"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 07 May 2004 08:27:07 PM
Ex a écrit:
[snip]
idiotic remarks ( mine included )
[snip]
Especially yours.
J.
.
User: "Ex"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 07 May 2004 09:18:14 PM
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:LHWmc.14975881$Of.2499063@news.easynews.com...



Ex a écrit:

[snip]
idiotic remarks ( mine included )
[snip]

Especially yours.

J.

Good man! You caught that ... after I had reread it I knew you'd find that!
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.676 / Virus Database: 438 - Release Date: 5/3/04
.



User: "Jean Guernon"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 07 May 2004 08:25:44 PM
Cuan a écrit:

On Thu, 06 May 2004 15:42:32 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:


Cuan a écrit:

Destroy destroy destroy. Yes, that is the latest buzzword in the USG
and amongst its supporters. If you don't like 'em, destroy 'em!
I suppose the western networks tell everything like it is? Perhaps,
Jean, Al Jazirah is the *only* network who *is* telling it like it is.
Seem to remember the conditions the US military placed on journalists
during 'Iraqi Freedom'. Everything had to be reviewed and sometimes
editted prior to broadcast, under the auspices of not releasing
strategic information.


Yes, I wish they would do the same with the Arab netwoerk and sue tehir pants
off for their lies, especially their anti-semite lies, Then we would see some truth.



Don't give the Moslems any idea's... if they decided to sue the USG
for all their crap, the US would be broke in no time.

I wish they would both sue eachother, and the US would never have to apy a cent.
But indeed theere would be no Al Jazirah before teh end of the year. I WISH.
But losers like you wil always say the opposite of the truth anyway. So what is
the use of even replying to you except of course to debunk your lies, thus
intervene in your post and speak to the NG.
J.
.
User: "Cuan"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 09 May 2004 04:47:16 AM
On Sat, 08 May 2004 01:25:44 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:

I wish they would both sue eachother, and the US would never have to apy a cent.
But indeed theere would be no Al Jazirah before teh end of the year. I WISH.

yeah. they wouldn't pay a cent. They got a big army.

But losers like you wil always say the opposite of the truth anyway. So what is
the use of even replying to you except of course to debunk your lies, thus
intervene in your post and speak to the NG.

and dimwits like you who cannot *see* the truth.
- cuan
.







User: "Big Fat Baz"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 04 May 2004 06:01:08 PM
It's a pity the Iraqis didn't have the bollocks to rise up against saddam
like they are against the Americans, if they did the Americans may not have
ever gone to war in the first place.
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040504080521.25861.00000552@mb-m04.aol.com...

After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.

But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.

Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.

Tony

.
User: "Cuan"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 05 May 2004 07:15:59 AM
On Wed, 5 May 2004 00:01:08 +0100, "Big Fat Baz"
<johncon2@hotmail.com> wrote:

It's a pity the Iraqis didn't have the bollocks to rise up against saddam
like they are against the Americans, if they did the Americans may not have
ever gone to war in the first place.

nah. they would have found another reason.
"We are going to Iraq to quell the anarchy! We will not falter in our
resolve! We shall bring peace and democracy to the citizens of Iraq,
and we will prevail!"
- cuan
.


User: ""

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 05 May 2004 07:09:41 AM
On 04 May 2004 12:05:21 GMT,
(TonyZ2001) wrote:

After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.

But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.

Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.

Tony

Hahahahah. Don't forget the Wmd's there pantyboy. Have they found them
yet? Hahahahahah. Typical American response, pass the blame to someone
else when the going gets a little rough.
.

User: "Cuan"

Title: Re: Why are Iraqi's so stupid? 04 May 2004 08:11:20 AM
On 04 May 2004 12:05:21 GMT,
(TonyZ2001) wrote:

After the first Gulf War all Iraq had to do was
comply with the UN Resolutions and within
2 or 3 years the snactions would have been lifted.

But no, they had to be stupid and play a cat
and mouse game the eventually led to another
war which dislodged the leader.

Now after the 2 war all these stupid people had to do
was quietthings down, if they had done so from day 1,
US troops would probably be out of Iraq by the Summer
of 2005, but they insist on this futile war game that will
only delay their eventual freedom.

Tony

trying to find another party to blame now? Now the Iraqi *people* are
the problem? *yawn*
.


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles