Never anonymous Bud wrote:

While still snuggled in a 'spider hole',

1. April 1995 Sollog gives a clear fax warning to the US

*****. Just more of the standard lies by SlapDork and his followers.

No. You're bullshitting and lying as usual. I just read and saw that fax
that
anyone can verify if they want. He did warn about a blast occurring
which he
described as a big bang and said it would happen on april 19, 1995.
Pretty clear
to me. He clearly stated an actual year, month and day date for a major
blast. The odds of a major blast happening on the day he said and that
it was
the first biggest act of terror on US soil on that date proves his
prophecy
was beyond coincidence if you have some intelligence.

I know you lie about sollog all the time here and never give any
evidence to
support what you say, so watching you lie like a rug again is no
surprise.

I hope people with brains will look into this particular hit of his. Its
really
quite interesting and does lend validity to sollog in a big way making
liars
like anonymous bud looks like a fool.

No. You're bullshitting and lying as usual.

Wally Anglesea? <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>> wrote in message news:<7m_Mb.8300$zj7.2000@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...

Jordan Lund wrote:

Never anonymous Bud <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message news:<np16005m0dnphtno4imk3gv17mjln4mnc8@4ax.com>...

Nope, he does NOT give the winner, OR the score.

Actually he does... look at the last three paragraphs:

FWIW I'm not saying I agree, but it will be interesting to see how he
spins it if it's blown. That's why I posted it.

And who determines whether he was right or wrong? Or what
standard will you be using to judge whether he blew it or not?

If evidence is given supporting where he says the riddle was
right and you can't show how its wrong, if you say its then
wrong, its nothing more than your opinion.

If the obvious fake includes all possibilities before the event,

obvious fake is completely useless. Slogfuk's riddle is no more
prophecy than the following statements:

Two of the following teams will be in the superbowl: Panthers,
Patriots, Eagles and Colts. Each team will have a score somewhere
between 0 and 100. I have now mentioned both teams in the superbowl,
the winner, and the score.

The Omega is upside down on the helmet of one team

Ergo "one team" = Colts

The Wings of a fowl are upon another

"another" = Eagles

Three eights is a good score
If you know how to add
That shall be the total of one

"one" = Colts
"the total of one" = "three eights"
So the Colts score 24.

I have given nine three times above and within this line is the fourth
time I have used it
That shall be the total of another

"another" = Eagles
"the total of another" = four nines.
So the Eagles score 36.

interesting deduction and analysis. I'm impressed you've at least
attempted an open-minded attempt

Certified redundant by the department of redundancy department.

But of course all of that is the obvious interpretation.

key word: interpretation.

think about it and consider that when you might claim he was
wrong.

I'm sure

he'll try to spin it a different way if the results are different.

And why can't I say that you'll be spinning it in a different way
as well if the results are different than you expect?

What proves you're spinning it, or he is?

Probably will try to say something like "the upturned Omega" didn't
actually refer to the Colts, but it did reference the upturned shoe of
the horse of Paul Revere, the Patriot... etc. etc. etc.

- Jordan

you're already jumping to conclusions and programming yourself in a
certain
way. What if the way you're looking at the riddle is wrong? What if
you've
missed something? Sollog is known to have shown connections in his
writings
that few were able to see or catch ahead of time and then they get mad
and refuse to admit a hit because of their own stupidity and failure,
not
his.

There's no way to judge this riddle until after the score is final.

Sure there is. The "riddle" contains all four team names who could
end up in the superbowl. So, no matter who ends up there, you'll
claim success.

accounts for every possible combination depending on how you look at
it.

=)

Those
who call his riddle bull are biased and ignorant and you know it. I'm
sure
you and someone with intelligence knows that you have to be totally
objective
and judge by facts alone. I'm also sure you might agree that prophecy
isn't always literal and therefore cannot always be judged in a literal
way.

Yah, there is that. If you are reading slugdog's B.S. for the first
time, dont bother with his fake of a website. He's not only a fake,
he's a weak, obvious fake--only good as a target for ridicule and
abuse.

Have a nice day, =)

Never anonymous Bud wrote:

While still snuggled in a 'spider hole',

Actually he does... look at the last three paragraphs:

Simply gobbledegook, as usual.

Which is nothing more than your opinion, as usual, which is
based on pure ignorance and bias. So no one cares really what you
have to say about anything in this group, as usual.