Why I am a Neo-Con



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Why I am a Neo-Con

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "Norio Hayakawa"
Date: 22 Mar 2005 10:47:47 PM
Object: Why I am a Neo-Con
WHY I AM A NEO-CONSERVATIVE (NEO-CON)
by Norio Hayakawa March 21, 2005
I consider myself to be a Neo-Conservative because I am in total
agreement with the basic tenets of the Neo-Conservative political
philosophies as defined by the Project for a New American Century
(PNAC).
PNAC is the think-tank that gave birth to the American
Neo-Conservative movement just prior to the dawn of the 21st Century.
I love my country, the U.S.A. I firmly believe that this great
nation is the bastion of freedom for the world today. I truly
believe in America, in America's goodness and in America's compassion
for the rest of the world. Therefore I am in total agreement with
PNAC's position that America must not seek an isolationist policy.
I also believe that America has been destined by God to bring freedom
to this world by encouraging the introduction of the democratic
processes to the nations where such processes are needed so that they
could freely determine their own destiny. America has truly been
blessed by God and will continue to be blessed by God as long as
America remains a nation of faith, integrity and compassion. America
is also blessed by God because of our support of Israel.
As a Neo-Conservative, I believe that a strong U.S. leadership is
essential for global security and stabilization. This does not mean
that the U.S. must play the role of the world's police. Global
security and stabilization, however, are the key factors for global
peace and prosperity.
I am a Neo-Con because I support Israel's right to exist and to defend
itself from terrorists whose goal is nothing less than the total
destruction of Israel.
I am a Neo-Con also because I believe that a democratic Palestinian
State should be established for the sake of peace in the near-future
that can co-exist side by side with Israel. It must be established
through negotiations and not through violence.
I believe in the stabilization of the Middle East through the
democratization of that region. The stabilization of the Middle East
is also vital from the standpoint of oil. The Middle East is the
region that is blessed with the abundance of oil and has been the most
economical resource of oil, a vital energy source for contemporary
society. A stable Middle East is essential for providing the
cheapest source of oil that benefits everyone.
As a Neo-Con, I fully support George W. Bush's War against Terrorism.
It is obvious that the greatest danger to this world today is the
presence of Islamic extremists and terrorists whose main goal is to
destroy Israel and to undermine, debilitate and ultimately destroy any
nation that supports Israel. Therefore the Neo-Cons take the
position that any nation that harbors terrorists can be a target of
pre-emptive, surgical strikes if those become the only recourse left
for the survival of America and the freedom-loving nations of the
world.
Since the Neo-Cons support the right of Israel to exist, naturally
there are Jewish supporters (including Jewish financiers) in the
Neo-Con movement. This does not mean that the Neo-Cons are controlled
or dictated by the Jews.
As a Bible-believing Christian, I fully support Israel because I
believe that the creation of the State of Israel in 1948, despite the
fact that it was effectuated by humanistic, Zionist movement, was a
miraculous event that marked the beginning of the prophetic
fulfillment of the end-time period long prophesied in the Bible.
It is also important to bring out the fact that the Neo-Conservative
movement is not a Zionist movement. The word "Zionism" is often
misinterpreted as a Jewish supremacist movement. This is far from the
truth. "Zionism", coined first in 1890, was simply a word that
described a movement to create a nation that the Jewish people could
call their own. By "Jewish people", I mean both the Ashkenazim
(non-semitic, European Jews) and the Sephardic (semitic, Middle
Eastern) Jews. Thus Zionism became a term used to describe an
organized movement of world Jewry for the reconstitution of a Jewish
State, which actually happened in Palestine in 1948. Zionists never
believed in Jewish supremacy nor had they any intention of controlling
the world. Their only goal was to create their own State, nothing
more.
Thus there is no need for Zionism today, since Israel became an
independent nation in 1948.
The Neo-Cons, therefore, are not Zionists. The Neo-Cons simply
support the right of Israel to exist as well as the right of the
Palestinians to have their own State in the near-future.
Another misconception about the Neo-Cons is the allegation that the
Neo-Cons' ultimate goal is to create a global government, or a New
World Order. The Neo-Cons have no such goals. On the contrary,
the Neo-Cons believe that a strong American leadership is exactly what
is preventing any future takeover of this world by global elitists.
It is my belief that the European Union-based (or controlled) global
elitsts, together with a loosely-knit network of European royalties
(who would attempt to manipulate European Jewish financiers) will be
the ones that would ultimately attempt to create a global government.
Thus there is a struggle at the present moment between the American
Neo-Conservative movement and the European Union-based global
elitists, each of which will do its utmost to rally the support of
Jewish financiers for their causes. My support goes to the American
Neo-Conservative forces.
--------
CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS
http://www.hometown.aol.com/groom51s4/index.html
.

User: "tw"

Title: Re: Why I am a Neo-Con 23 Mar 2005 03:50:12 AM
"Norio Hayakawa" <Groom51s4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7ef67232.0503222047.59a7181e@posting.google.com...

WHY I AM A NEO-CONSERVATIVE (NEO-CON)
by Norio Hayakawa March 21, 2005

I consider myself to be a Neo-Conservative because I am in total
agreement with the basic tenets of the Neo-Conservative political
philosophies as defined by the Project for a New American Century
(PNAC).
PNAC is the think-tank that gave birth to the American
Neo-Conservative movement just prior to the dawn of the 21st Century.

I love my country, the U.S.A. I firmly believe that this great
nation is the bastion of freedom for the world today. I truly
believe in America, in America's goodness and in America's compassion
for the rest of the world. Therefore I am in total agreement with
PNAC's position that America must not seek an isolationist policy.

I also believe that America has been destined by God ..

<schnip>

America has truly been blessed by God and will continue to be blessed by

God
Then you're a fruitcake. End of story. Foreign policy shoudl NOT, repeat NOT
be based on your insane belief that some Sky Pixie favours your nation above
all others. That's how people like the Taliban get in power.
.

User: "FourCell"

Title: Re: Why I am a Neo-Con 23 Mar 2005 07:48:43 PM
If you are going to base your "beliefs" on what has been
published by a non-elected "think tank" with the
innocent name of "Project For The New American Century"
then you better read ALL of the 60 page document they published
in September, 2000, entitled innocently "Preparing for
America's Defenses in the 21st Century.
Not since Mein Kampf has there been telegraphed to the
world a more dangerous and arrogant plan.
If you have read it, then you will see that it quite clearly
sets out to block any nation, other than the United States,
(and a small list of other nations sharing its agenda
from achieving any further influence in world affairs.
And this goal is to be achieved, according to that document,
by use of military force - anywhere, at any time, the US
so chooses, against ANY nation, including those which have
been its allies, and which have democratic governments.
To achieve these goals, the document quite clearly points
out that the US will increase it's military forces and
spending to what they were at the HEIGHT of the Cold
War, no matter what impact it has on the health and well
being of Americans, their freedoms, or their wishes.
In the case of China, Russia, and other nations, that
document is a declaration of intent for future war.
In fact, the document calls for the US to plan to wage
muliple MAJOR wars all over the world simultaneously,
no matter what the cost or consequences.
You obviously have no knowledge of America's role in
overthowing over 21 democratically elected governments
in the past century. John Negroponte, recently appointed
to oversee America's "Security" was ambassador to Guatmala
in the the 1980's, and personally managed the application
of use of Army Special forces in training Central
American death squads to kill students, pofessorss,ss
nuns, priests, and a trade unionists - anyone who might
speak out against US backed dictators, against facist
run death sqauds. This is the heritage of the "Project
for the New American Century". It looks just like the
project for the last American century, with a very long
ilst of CIA installed dictators (including Saddam Hussein),
anyone who would prevent democracy from growing.
This was a century where FBI agents when to Latin America,
Iran, Saudi Arabia, South Vietnam, and many others,
to setup torture chambers and to train assassins. If you
deny this or are unaware of it, then you know nothing of the
history of the United States, carved in stone and written
in blood. It's fact, not speculation.
There's a song by the Who, that has the lines "Meet the New
Boss, same as the Old Boss." Nothing could be more appropriate
when it comes to the plans the US has, as written by those
approxmately 20, nameless men, most of whom who hold
dual nationality, that wrote that roadmap document for the
"Project for the New American Century".
What bothers me more than your ignorance, is the fact the
the objectives outlined in that document are impossible
to obtain. The US will go broke long before it can fight
the rest of the world. The rest of the world WILL NOT
ACCEPT another country, not even the United States, from
declaring that it will use by military force, to dominate
all other nations and prevent them from growing in influence.
The Third Reich had its "True Believers", just like you.
What mattered, is that the rest of the world didn't buy it.
Not then, and they don't buy it now.
The US will fail, because the intent outlined in that document
is purely a call for the US to militarily dominate the rest
of the world, and that will never happen.
Because being a superpower, does not give the United States
superpowers. It is nearly bankrupt, and cannot hope to
borrow enough money from it's stated enemies to possibly ever
wage war against the world for its delared fanatical beliefs.
When the end of your empire comes, we'll see if you stand up
on the street corner shouting that you are NEO-CON", any
more than any German would have stood in the rubble of their
country in 1946, shouting that they had been a NAZI.
Read your Sept, 2000 Mein Kampf again, and look carefully at the
names of its authors.
Groom51s4@yahoo.com (Norio Hayakawa) wrote in message news:<7ef67232.0503222047.59a7181e@posting.google.com>...

WHY I AM A NEO-CONSERVATIVE (NEO-CON)
by Norio Hayakawa March 21, 2005

I consider myself to be a Neo-Conservative because I am in total
agreement with the basic tenets of the Neo-Conservative political
philosophies as defined by the Project for a New American Century
(PNAC).
PNAC is the think-tank that gave birth to the American
Neo-Conservative movement just prior to the dawn of the 21st Century.

I love my country, the U.S.A. I firmly believe that this great
nation is the bastion of freedom for the world today. I truly
believe in America, in America's goodness and in America's compassion
for the rest of the world. Therefore I am in total agreement with
PNAC's position that America must not seek an isolationist policy.

I also believe that America has been destined by God to bring freedom
to this world by encouraging the introduction of the democratic
processes to the nations where such processes are needed so that they
could freely determine their own destiny. America has truly been
blessed by God and will continue to be blessed by God as long as
America remains a nation of faith, integrity and compassion. America
is also blessed by God because of our support of Israel.

As a Neo-Conservative, I believe that a strong U.S. leadership is
essential for global security and stabilization. This does not mean
that the U.S. must play the role of the world's police. Global
security and stabilization, however, are the key factors for global
peace and prosperity.

I am a Neo-Con because I support Israel's right to exist and to defend
itself from terrorists whose goal is nothing less than the total
destruction of Israel.
I am a Neo-Con also because I believe that a democratic Palestinian
State should be established for the sake of peace in the near-future
that can co-exist side by side with Israel. It must be established
through negotiations and not through violence.
I believe in the stabilization of the Middle East through the
democratization of that region. The stabilization of the Middle East
is also vital from the standpoint of oil. The Middle East is the
region that is blessed with the abundance of oil and has been the most
economical resource of oil, a vital energy source for contemporary
society. A stable Middle East is essential for providing the
cheapest source of oil that benefits everyone.

As a Neo-Con, I fully support George W. Bush's War against Terrorism.
It is obvious that the greatest danger to this world today is the
presence of Islamic extremists and terrorists whose main goal is to
destroy Israel and to undermine, debilitate and ultimately destroy any
nation that supports Israel. Therefore the Neo-Cons take the
position that any nation that harbors terrorists can be a target of
pre-emptive, surgical strikes if those become the only recourse left
for the survival of America and the freedom-loving nations of the
world.

Since the Neo-Cons support the right of Israel to exist, naturally
there are Jewish supporters (including Jewish financiers) in the
Neo-Con movement. This does not mean that the Neo-Cons are controlled
or dictated by the Jews.
As a Bible-believing Christian, I fully support Israel because I
believe that the creation of the State of Israel in 1948, despite the
fact that it was effectuated by humanistic, Zionist movement, was a
miraculous event that marked the beginning of the prophetic
fulfillment of the end-time period long prophesied in the Bible.

It is also important to bring out the fact that the Neo-Conservative
movement is not a Zionist movement. The word "Zionism" is often
misinterpreted as a Jewish supremacist movement. This is far from the
truth. "Zionism", coined first in 1890, was simply a word that
described a movement to create a nation that the Jewish people could
call their own. By "Jewish people", I mean both the Ashkenazim
(non-semitic, European Jews) and the Sephardic (semitic, Middle
Eastern) Jews. Thus Zionism became a term used to describe an
organized movement of world Jewry for the reconstitution of a Jewish
State, which actually happened in Palestine in 1948. Zionists never
believed in Jewish supremacy nor had they any intention of controlling
the world. Their only goal was to create their own State, nothing
more.
Thus there is no need for Zionism today, since Israel became an
independent nation in 1948.
The Neo-Cons, therefore, are not Zionists. The Neo-Cons simply
support the right of Israel to exist as well as the right of the
Palestinians to have their own State in the near-future.

Another misconception about the Neo-Cons is the allegation that the
Neo-Cons' ultimate goal is to create a global government, or a New
World Order. The Neo-Cons have no such goals. On the contrary,
the Neo-Cons believe that a strong American leadership is exactly what
is preventing any future takeover of this world by global elitists.
It is my belief that the European Union-based (or controlled) global
elitsts, together with a loosely-knit network of European royalties
(who would attempt to manipulate European Jewish financiers) will be
the ones that would ultimately attempt to create a global government.
Thus there is a struggle at the present moment between the American
Neo-Conservative movement and the European Union-based global
elitists, each of which will do its utmost to rally the support of
Jewish financiers for their causes. My support goes to the American
Neo-Conservative forces.

--------
CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS
http://www.hometown.aol.com/groom51s4/index.html

.

User: "WH"

Title: Re: Why I am a Neo-Con 23 Mar 2005 08:35:42 AM
Norio Hayakawa wrote:

WHY I AM A NEO-CONSERVATIVE (NEO-CON)
by Norio Hayakawa March 21, 2005

I consider myself to be a Neo-Conservative...

....whilst everyone else considers you to be a *****!
WH
.
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: Why I am a Neo-Con 23 Mar 2005 02:52:48 PM
WH "Fuckin' terrorist supporting *****" wrote:

Norio Hayakawa wrote:

WHY I AM A NEO-CONSERVATIVE (NEO-CON)
by Norio Hayakawa March 21, 2005

I consider myself to be a Neo-Conservative...


...whilst everyone else considers you to be a *****!

That came from a Fuckin' terrorist supporting *****.

WH

"everyone?"
lol.
Al'Qaeda and your terrorist buddies are included ;)
.

User: "Hans D. Magnusson"

Title: WH again! 23 Mar 2005 09:16:21 AM
WH wrote / skrev:

Norio Hayakawa wrote:

WHY I AM A NEO-CONSERVATIVE (NEO-CON)
by Norio Hayakawa March 21, 2005

I consider myself to be a Neo-Conservative...



...whilst everyone else considers you to be a *****!

WH

"Everyone else"? The master mind has spoken again.
.
User: "WH"

Title: Re: WH again! 27 Mar 2005 03:10:16 PM
Hans D. Magnusson wrote:

WH wrote / skrev:

Norio Hayakawa wrote:

WHY I AM A NEO-CONSERVATIVE (NEO-CON)
by Norio Hayakawa March 21, 2005

I consider myself to be a Neo-Conservative...



...whilst everyone else considers you to be a *****!

WH

"Everyone else"? The master mind has spoken again.

Point me to someone who doesn't think that Min's a ***** then Hasse
baby. Yourself and pantyboy don't count...
WH
.
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: WH again! 28 Mar 2005 06:06:19 PM
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<1111957816.079887.173530@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>...

Hans D. Magnusson wrote:

WH wrote / skrev:

Norio Hayakawa wrote:

WHY I AM A NEO-CONSERVATIVE (NEO-CON)
by Norio Hayakawa March 21, 2005

I consider myself to be a Neo-Conservative...



...whilst everyone else considers you to be a *****!

WH

"Everyone else"? The master mind has spoken again.


Point me to someone who doesn't think that Min's a ***** then Hasse
baby. Yourself and pantyboy don't count...

WH

lol.
Maybe you can ask some of your Al'Qaeda fucki' friends ***** - You
libelous little terrorist loving and perverted sicko ~ ;)
And all this ***** I just said is backed up too mutha fucka, ya know
that. ;)
Better get on that phone and call your terrorist boyfriend and tell
him that you are being exposed again and how much it hurts when the
truth is known ;)
.
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: WH again! 30 Mar 2005 01:32:59 PM
(Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote in message
app. WH and TW
repost:
parris_k@yahoo.com (Tom) wrote in message TW
news:<aa5c37da.0503292319.7667e385@posting.google.com>...

"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <

> wrote in message

I do no such thing, pissboy.


.....says the terrorist supporter. What? - you love your boyfriends
wishes that the US be nuked off the face of the map.





YOu are simply too dumb



Nope, I do not go around wishing terrorist supporters nuke millions of
people lik'ya! :)


to comprehend what was
actually written. No wonder you're such a chew-toy around here.



"Which would [sic] have been 14 miles away and 13,700 feet lower

than

TWA 800.
That must have been one hell of a big MANPAD! LOL -KookyTW


I guess you are smarter then the entire FBI ( or how you spell it

FBO)

because they looked for parts of a missile attack right off the

bat.




This means you are a KOOK! ;) I rather trust our FBI over a kook

like

ya ;) Got it KOOK!?!


Ah.. but the FBIs conclusion was that there was no missile involved.





Not the point.



Yes it is. You say you'd "rather turst the FBI over a kook" while
simultaneously believing kooks over the FBI because it suits your
bizarre Clinton bashing obsessions. Do TRY and keep up, Mikey!

Not the point again. I should that you said you know better than the
FBI.
That was the point the above is irrelevant. Better get back to your
terrorist boyfriend who like Incest and ***** and all that you love to
promote.
His name is AK.



Anyone reading this knows this was not the point.


LOL!
Coming from a terrorist Al' Qaeda Supporting ***** like you I do not
see any honesty EVER from ya ;)


U place yourself above the FBI and other agencies all who tried to find
missile parts after the downing of TWA F800.


Where? Are you still claiming I said nobody was looking for a missile,

You implied the plane was too far and too high for any missile to go
that high. I have to rehash your lying accusation all the time, there
Al' Qaeda loving fucker. Better get back to your Boyfriend AK and plan
on your worshipping sessions of mass destruction, you sick perverted
*****.

or have you swapped to a new lie?

I have not lied and Do Not Support Al' Qaeda like ya ;)

But
you'd rather blame Clinton tahn trust the FBI,

Putting words into my mouth you wisher of 10 nukes to go off in the US.


What?



Fuckin' terrorist supporting *****.



You truly have lost it,

Lost being a Al' Qaeda terrorist supporting hack like ya - I NEVER WAS
OR WILL BE
Bwahahahahahahahaha! ;)

Mikey (if you ever had it, which I doubt)

woudln't you? Kooky pissboy..


I'm not like you pathetic *****. I do not go around wishing terrorist
supporters nuke millions of people lik'ya! :)


..and where did I do that, you lying sack of filth?

Every time you reference your terrorist supporting boyfriends Sick
perverted criminal ***** posts AK. Solid Proof. It happens all the time
you hit and run away like a little chicken and come back later with
your filthy sick libel campaign. But we know you are a bullshitter and
not a peace loving guy from the get-go - you been ousted for a long
time with AK a real terrorist supporter - getting on two years now.
Bwahahahahahahha!
Solid Proof.
Anytime I can help outing the real TW ( Tommy) here just let me know
;)
In regards to :
http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=aa5c37da.0503300012.7feaf11b%40posting.google.com&prev=/groups%3Fnum%3D25%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26group%3Dalt.prophecies.nostradamus%26start%3D25
.

User: "WH"

Title: Re: WH again! 29 Mar 2005 10:05:04 AM
Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:

"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:<1111957816.079887.173530@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>...

Hans D. Magnusson wrote:

WH wrote / skrev:

Norio Hayakawa wrote:

WHY I AM A NEO-CONSERVATIVE (NEO-CON)
by Norio Hayakawa March 21, 2005

I consider myself to be a Neo-Conservative...



...whilst everyone else considers you to be a *****!

WH

"Everyone else"? The master mind has spoken again.


Point me to someone who doesn't think that Min's a ***** then Hasse
baby. Yourself and pantyboy don't count...

WH


lol.

Maybe you can ask some of your Al'Qaeda fucki' friends ***** - You
libelous little terrorist loving and perverted sicko ~ ;)


And all this ***** I just said is backed up too mutha fucka, ya know
that. ;)

Better get on that phone and call your terrorist boyfriend and tell
him that you are being exposed again and how much it hurts when the
truth is known ;)

You don't count either pissboy!
WH
.
User: "Tom"

Title: Re: WH again! 30 Mar 2005 02:56:32 AM
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<1112112304.109442.22150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>...

Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:

"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:<1111957816.079887.173530@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>...

Hans D. Magnusson wrote:

WH wrote / skrev:

Norio Hayakawa wrote:

WHY I AM A NEO-CONSERVATIVE (NEO-CON)
by Norio Hayakawa March 21, 2005

I consider myself to be a Neo-Conservative...



...whilst everyone else considers you to be a *****!

WH

"Everyone else"? The master mind has spoken again.


Point me to someone who doesn't think that Min's a ***** then Hasse
baby. Yourself and pantyboy don't count...

WH


lol.

Maybe you can ask some of your Al'Qaeda fucki' friends ***** - You
libelous little terrorist loving and perverted sicko ~ ;)


And all this ***** I just said is backed up too mutha fucka, ya know
that. ;)

Better get on that phone and call your terrorist boyfriend and tell
him that you are being exposed again and how much it hurts when the
truth is known ;)


You don't count either pissboy!

Judging by the intellectual content of his posts, he probably CAN'T count....


WH

.

User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: WH again! 30 Mar 2005 01:06:13 PM
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<1112112304.109442.22150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>...

Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:

"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:<1111957816.079887.173530@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>...

Hans D. Magnusson wrote:

WH wrote / skrev:

Norio Hayakawa wrote:

WHY I AM A NEO-CONSERVATIVE (NEO-CON)
by Norio Hayakawa March 21, 2005

I consider myself to be a Neo-Conservative...



...whilst everyone else considers you to be a *****!

WH

"Everyone else"? The master mind has spoken again.


Point me to someone who doesn't think that Min's a ***** then Hasse
baby. Yourself and pantyboy don't count...

WH


lol.

Maybe you can ask some of your Al'Qaeda fucki' friends ***** - You
libelous little terrorist loving and perverted sicko ~ ;)


And all this ***** I just said is backed up too mutha fucka, ya know
that. ;)

Better get on that phone and call your terrorist boyfriend and tell
him that you are being exposed again and how much it hurts when the
truth is known ;)


You don't count either pissboy!

Yeah... I do not count into your sick, filthy, perverted libelous
terrorist supporting club.


WH

.




User: ""

Title: Re: WH again! 24 Mar 2005 06:21:47 AM
Hans wrote:

WH wrote / skrev:

Norio Hayakawa wrote:

WHY I AM A NEO-CONSERVATIVE (NEO-CON)
by Norio Hayakawa March 21, 2005
I consider myself to be a Neo-Conservative...

...whilst everyone else considers you to be a *****!
WH

"Everyone else"? The master mind has spoken again.

LOL!!!
Funny, especially since it is Chris who is contstantly asking me who
"we" is, now he speaks for "everyone".
Tony
.



User: "John Smith"

Title: Re: Why I am a Neo-Con 23 Mar 2005 03:16:22 AM
Sounds all very noble until you see the reality of your neo-con policies
abroad.
http://www.rawa.org/cluster2.htm
--
Regards
John Smith
"Norio Hayakawa" <Groom51s4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7ef67232.0503222047.59a7181e@posting.google.com...

WHY I AM A NEO-CONSERVATIVE (NEO-CON)
by Norio Hayakawa March 21, 2005

I consider myself to be a Neo-Conservative because I am in total
agreement with the basic tenets of the Neo-Conservative political
philosophies as defined by the Project for a New American Century
(PNAC).
PNAC is the think-tank that gave birth to the American
Neo-Conservative movement just prior to the dawn of the 21st Century.

I love my country, the U.S.A. I firmly believe that this great
nation is the bastion of freedom for the world today. I truly
believe in America, in America's goodness and in America's compassion
for the rest of the world. Therefore I am in total agreement with
PNAC's position that America must not seek an isolationist policy.

I also believe that America has been destined by God to bring freedom
to this world by encouraging the introduction of the democratic
processes to the nations where such processes are needed so that they
could freely determine their own destiny. America has truly been
blessed by God and will continue to be blessed by God as long as
America remains a nation of faith, integrity and compassion. America
is also blessed by God because of our support of Israel.

As a Neo-Conservative, I believe that a strong U.S. leadership is
essential for global security and stabilization. This does not mean
that the U.S. must play the role of the world's police. Global
security and stabilization, however, are the key factors for global
peace and prosperity.

I am a Neo-Con because I support Israel's right to exist and to defend
itself from terrorists whose goal is nothing less than the total
destruction of Israel.
I am a Neo-Con also because I believe that a democratic Palestinian
State should be established for the sake of peace in the near-future
that can co-exist side by side with Israel. It must be established
through negotiations and not through violence.
I believe in the stabilization of the Middle East through the
democratization of that region. The stabilization of the Middle East
is also vital from the standpoint of oil. The Middle East is the
region that is blessed with the abundance of oil and has been the most
economical resource of oil, a vital energy source for contemporary
society. A stable Middle East is essential for providing the
cheapest source of oil that benefits everyone.

As a Neo-Con, I fully support George W. Bush's War against Terrorism.
It is obvious that the greatest danger to this world today is the
presence of Islamic extremists and terrorists whose main goal is to
destroy Israel and to undermine, debilitate and ultimately destroy any
nation that supports Israel. Therefore the Neo-Cons take the
position that any nation that harbors terrorists can be a target of
pre-emptive, surgical strikes if those become the only recourse left
for the survival of America and the freedom-loving nations of the
world.

Since the Neo-Cons support the right of Israel to exist, naturally
there are Jewish supporters (including Jewish financiers) in the
Neo-Con movement. This does not mean that the Neo-Cons are controlled
or dictated by the Jews.
As a Bible-believing Christian, I fully support Israel because I
believe that the creation of the State of Israel in 1948, despite the
fact that it was effectuated by humanistic, Zionist movement, was a
miraculous event that marked the beginning of the prophetic
fulfillment of the end-time period long prophesied in the Bible.

It is also important to bring out the fact that the Neo-Conservative
movement is not a Zionist movement. The word "Zionism" is often
misinterpreted as a Jewish supremacist movement. This is far from the
truth. "Zionism", coined first in 1890, was simply a word that
described a movement to create a nation that the Jewish people could
call their own. By "Jewish people", I mean both the Ashkenazim
(non-semitic, European Jews) and the Sephardic (semitic, Middle
Eastern) Jews. Thus Zionism became a term used to describe an
organized movement of world Jewry for the reconstitution of a Jewish
State, which actually happened in Palestine in 1948. Zionists never
believed in Jewish supremacy nor had they any intention of controlling
the world. Their only goal was to create their own State, nothing
more.
Thus there is no need for Zionism today, since Israel became an
independent nation in 1948.
The Neo-Cons, therefore, are not Zionists. The Neo-Cons simply
support the right of Israel to exist as well as the right of the
Palestinians to have their own State in the near-future.

Another misconception about the Neo-Cons is the allegation that the
Neo-Cons' ultimate goal is to create a global government, or a New
World Order. The Neo-Cons have no such goals. On the contrary,
the Neo-Cons believe that a strong American leadership is exactly what
is preventing any future takeover of this world by global elitists.
It is my belief that the European Union-based (or controlled) global
elitsts, together with a loosely-knit network of European royalties
(who would attempt to manipulate European Jewish financiers) will be
the ones that would ultimately attempt to create a global government.
Thus there is a struggle at the present moment between the American
Neo-Conservative movement and the European Union-based global
elitists, each of which will do its utmost to rally the support of
Jewish financiers for their causes. My support goes to the American
Neo-Conservative forces.

--------
CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS
http://www.hometown.aol.com/groom51s4/index.html

.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER