Never anonymous Butt <newskat@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<402F66EB.3C56@earthlink.net>...

lensman1955 wrote:

"TruthSeeker" <Truth@Truth.net> wrote in message news:<J8SWb.6400$PY.6189@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com>...

"lensman1955" <lensman1955@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:633b063b.0402070857.22ee3574@posting.google.com...

"TruthSeeker" <cloudboy1@aol.comabc> wrote in message

news:<1HXQb.4413$BA2.16@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com>...

"BlueAce69" <BlueAce69@aol.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:bush4e0ak2@drn.newsguy.com...

In article <1GgQb.3743$BA2.1717@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com>,

TruthSeeker
says...

"The REAL Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:hq4310pl623r8kvl5fq1d1jq3mgfh0tdvv@4ax.com...

While still snuggled in a 'spider hole',

scribbled:

Dunno whether JP Ennis aka Sollog is dead or what,
but this fella's admiration is based on the fact(?)
that Sollog apparently predicted 911 in 1998.

Ennis did NO such thing.

You're such a freakin' moron. SOLLOG DID PREDICT 911! HERE'S THE

PROOF:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=6tb7rp%24g

vr%241%40winter.news.erols.com

Are you so blind that you cannot see this most obvious and clear

hit!!
WTF.

Do you hate Sollog so much that you would lie to yourself and tell

yourself

that the above link is not an accurate prediction.

I guess it's because you've been bad-mouthing Sollog for so long that

it

would make you "look bad" if you started to agree with him.

Whatever the case may be, you are most certainly a lying, fucktard.

Are you too gullible to see how vauge that "warning" was?

Vague?? I think you meant to say the warning is specific! It gives the
EXACT DATE of the 911 attacks and it states how Washington DC would be
affected. How much more specific must one be before you see the truth?

No

one can just give out a random date and have the greatest act of Terror,

in

the USA, occur on that EXACT DATE!

Actually, it doesn't say HOW Washington DC will be affected, only that
there will be a great emergency. A warning with a date attached is no
good if there isn't a year and a little more useful information.

So you need "a little more useful information" to connect the dots and
figure out Sollog is talking about a major terrorist attack? Look you
fucking moron,

Way to win friends and influence people, dude!

Sollog gave the EXACT DATE for the most siginficant terrorist
attack in American History. He said a "great emergency" would occur on 911
and Washington DC would be affected. Every single word of that warning was
fulfilled when 911 occured.

Actually no. He gave a month and date. To give the EXACT DATE, he
would have had to add "/01"

Mr Xinophoel actually gave month day and year. Now that your entire
case is blown to shreds, what stupid excuse will you try to save face
with? Haha! :0

Here's the quote you posted a link to;

SOLLOG SAYS THAT ON 911 THERE WILL BE A GREAT EMERCENCY IN WASHINGTON
DC
ANOTHER GARAUNTEE FROM SOLLOG THE GOD OF ONE!!!!!

READ IT AND WEEP MORONS!!!!!

I don't see a year anywhere here.

Was there a "great emergency in Washington DC" on 9/11/2001? Hell yea there
was! The greatest terrorist attack on American soil! So everything Sollog
warned of was correct.

An understatement does not qualify as a hit. Did he say "disaster?"

"great emergency" implies a type of disaster, fucktard.

No, "great emergency" implies an emergency of some sort. It could be a
fire, or a terrorist attack, Clinton's refusal to sign the budget,
putting the government on hold so to speak, qualified as an emergency.

so why did you ignore the evidence in this post?

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=f2967f4e.0308051244.20bb62d7%40posting.google.com&rnum=1

and you ignored "my" recent set of posts which answered your issue in
detail.

Must have missed it.

gawd you are so effin stupid

It's always such a please to talk to you too!

Did he say "attack?" No, he said "emergency," thus anything that
happened on a 9/11 at any time in the future would qualify as a hit.

Let me repeat it again since you're a real big rat reTURD

"my" recent set of posts which you and everyone here ignored,
answered your issue in detail.

At that on this thread? I'll have to review.

If my evidence was wrong, why didn't you or anyone show how it was?

(Good thing for Sollog nothing actually happened on 98, 99 or 2000, he
might have claimed a hit then and then would have had to backpedel
when a [real] disaster occured. (He's done it before.)

Let me repeat it again since you're a real big rat reTURD

"my" recent set of posts which you and everyone here ignored,
answered your issue in detail.

Now you want to argue that the warning wasn't specific enough? The warning
is as specific as it needs to be. Sollog says something "great" is going to
happen on 911 and only three years later you have a major terrorist attack
that has affected the entire world.

So what if he doesn't mention the WTC, the warning is still 100% accurate
and it is easily tied to the 911 attack by using at least two active brain
cells.

Which sounds like about how many you have firing.

Keep in mind that this is the only such warning where a fan of Sollog spoke
on his behalf and gave a SPECIFIC DATE for some future event. You fools are
acting like L9 posted a date every week hoping something would happen on
that date. Wrong! This is the only such warning, and for something as
major as a huge terrorist attack to occur on that date indeed validates the
warning.

Man, you all are STUPID!!

Again, specific date requires year.

Answered.

Here's the post again.

SOLLOG SAYS THAT ON 911 THERE WILL BE A GREAT EMERCENCY IN WASHINGTON
DC
ANOTHER GARAUNTEE FROM SOLLOG THE GOD OF ONE!!!!!

READ IT AND WEEP MORONS!!!!!

Not seeing a year here.