Everyone knows this loser lies constantly. The question is, does he
know why he lies?
.
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
03 Oct 2007 10:37:37 AM |
|
|
On Oct 3, 7:44 am, eric <ericdavis...@gmail.com> wrote:
Everyone knows this loser lies constantly. The question is, does he
know why he lies?
Do you have an example? Just one? Of course not, or you'd post
something substantive. Instead, all you've got are you usual
meaningless platitudes. How weak.
.
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
03 Oct 2007 11:55:49 AM |
|
|
On Oct 3, 11:37 am, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 3, 7:44 am, eric <ericdavis...@gmail.com> wrote:
Everyone knows this loser lies constantly. The question is, does he
know why he lies?
Do you have an example? Just one? Of course not, or you'd post
something substantive. Instead, all you've got are you usual
meaningless platitudes. How weak.
Noam Chomsky a Pol Pot suppoter, and many, many more. Of course, a
patholigical liar like you will always deny, deny, deny.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pers3id" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
04 Oct 2007 04:45:06 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, eric <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat
the Words
On Oct 3, 11:37 am, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 3, 7:44 am, eric <ericdavis...@gmail.com> wrote:
Everyone knows this loser lies constantly. The question is, does he
know why he lies?
Do you have an example? Just one? Of course not, or you'd post
something substantive. Instead, all you've got are you usual
meaningless platitudes. How weak.
Noam Chomsky a Pol Pot suppoter, and many, many more. Of course, a
patholigical liar like you will always deny, deny, deny.
Him labeling the anti-war progressives as 'radicals' is another
lie intended to keep the war going as long as possible.. then there
is the denial of course.. these Bush leg-humpers like stevie do more
lying to themselves than anyone else.. I shudder to imagine the disrepair
of their mental state, you know, lying long enough about things results in
a separation from reality which is distinctive of the neocons.. Bush is a
good example of this.. so is Cheney, Darth Cheney, who is ok with
murdering, torturing, and disappearing people with the agenda being to
turn a profit..
I'm thinking psych counseling is going to be high demand in a
couple years, with all the screwed up and leaderless neocons looking
for the new talking points but not having any.. once they have to
actually face reality it's going to be the shits for them..
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
04 Oct 2007 08:19:12 AM |
|
|
Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Him labeling the anti-war progressives as 'radicals'
is another lie
I don't think Steven is a liar. I think he's stupid.
He strikes me as someone who takes a great deal
for granted, never rarely (if ever) questioning
his beliefs.
He reminds me of another Reichtard over in
alt.atheism, a guy calling himself "Fred Stone."
Now, "Fred" once argued that the U.S. didn't
leave the Iraqi museums unguarded after the
invasion -- as had been widely documented -- and
to "Prove" it he offered a cite which... well...
If the guy had actually read his own cite he
would have known that, yes, it CONFIRMED that
the museums had been left unguarded.
What the story actually said was that some of
the more valuable missing items -- missing
after the looting -- may have been stashed
away in safety by Saddam's government before
the war.
Anyhow, Steven seems just as bad.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
04 Oct 2007 10:04:59 AM |
|
|
On Oct 4, 6:19 am, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Him labeling the anti-war progressives as 'radicals'
is another lie
I don't think Steven is a liar. I think he's stupid.
He strikes me as someone who takes a great deal
for granted, never rarely (if ever) questioning
his beliefs.
Wrong again. I've been questioning my beliefs my entire life. That's
why I left the religion of my birth when I reached adulthood. That's
why I'm not a modern liberal even though I was raised by Democrats.
Yeah, sure, I just plod along and never question my beliefs. Sheesh.
He reminds me of another Reichtard over in
alt.atheism, a guy calling himself "Fred Stone."
Now, "Fred" once argued that the U.S. didn't
leave the Iraqi museums unguarded after the
invasion --
But I never made that argument -- and would *never* have made that
argument -- so this comparison is irrelevant. Feel free to try again,
and try something that applies specifically to me instead of making
some false comparison.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
05 Oct 2007 07:08:10 AM |
|
|
Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Wrong again. I've been questioning my beliefs
my entire life.
And in all that time nobody ever told you that
anicdotal evidence is no evidence at all?
But I never made that argument -- and would *never*
have made that argument --
You have repeatedly argued that Democratic figures
own their own private intelligence agency, and/or that
the various U.S. government intelligence gathering
agencies never considered Bush to be the Commander
& Chief. That is, seeing how you insisted that the
pre-war statements by Democrats somehow "Proves"
that Bush's fake intel did not influence anyone's
vote on the war.
It's apparent to the rest of the English speaking
world that these figures were heavily influenced
by Bush's fake intel.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
05 Oct 2007 09:09:03 PM |
|
|
On Oct 5, 5:08 am, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Wrong again. I've been questioning my beliefs
my entire life.
And in all that time nobody ever told you that
anicdotal evidence is no evidence at all?
To what, exactly, are you referring?>
But I never made that argument -- and would *never*
have made that argument --
You have repeatedly argued that Democratic figures
own their own private intelligence agency, and/or that
the various U.S. government intelligence gathering
agencies never considered Bush to be the Commander
& Chief
What??? I've never said anything of the kind. Get sober and try again.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
07 Oct 2007 04:13:37 AM |
|
|
"Pers3id" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns99BF2629FAA27rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, eric <ericdavis500@gmail.com>
Spat
the Words
On Oct 3, 11:37 am, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 3, 7:44 am, eric <ericdavis...@gmail.com> wrote:
Everyone knows this loser lies constantly. The question is, does he
know why he lies?
Do you have an example? Just one? Of course not, or you'd post
something substantive. Instead, all you've got are you usual
meaningless platitudes. How weak.
Noam Chomsky a Pol Pot suppoter, and many, many more. Of course, a
patholigical liar like you will always deny, deny, deny.
Him labeling the anti-war progressives as 'radicals' is another
lie intended to keep the war going as long as possible.. then there
is the denial of course.. these Bush leg-humpers like stevie do more
lying to themselves than anyone else.. I shudder to imagine the
disrepair
of their mental state, you know, lying long enough about things results
in
a separation from reality which is distinctive of the neocons.. Bush is
a
good example of this.. so is Cheney, Darth Cheney, who is ok with
murdering, torturing, and disappearing people with the agenda being to
turn a profit..
I'm thinking psych counseling is going to be high demand in a
couple years, with all the screwed up and leaderless neocons looking
for the new talking points but not having any.. once they have to
actually face reality it's going to be the shits for them..
I can just picture in 2009 the waiting rooms in shrink's offices and
community mental health clinic's across the nation, and especially in the
midwest and south -- chock full of mumbling, teary-eyed, droopy neocons
with dirty worn-out T-shirts that read, "Four More Years -- Bush-Cheney
2004", with crucifix tatoos on their arms that read, "The Rapture Is
Coming". Some will have ***** stained pants, while others will wander about
with no pants at all, playing with themselves and getting arrested for
lewd public acts and indecent exposure. Stevie will not be in any of these
places, however. He'll be at home on his lil' 'puter hopelessly immersed
in Michelle Malkin's website, grumbling, "The fringe lefties have
destroyed everything, but we still got Jesus' coming shining fresh utopia
and all they got to look forward is a sweaty barbecue party in hell with
Satan." He then types out another seminal email to Malkin, confessing his
undying devotion and love for her.
ROFL!!
Doc :))~~
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
04 Oct 2007 10:01:19 AM |
|
|
On Oct 4, 2:45 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, eric <ericdavis...@gmail.com> Spat
the Words
On Oct 3, 11:37 am, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 3, 7:44 am, eric <ericdavis...@gmail.com> wrote:
Everyone knows this loser lies constantly. The question is, does he
know why he lies?
Do you have an example? Just one? Of course not, or you'd post
something substantive. Instead, all you've got are you usual
meaningless platitudes. How weak.
Noam Chomsky a Pol Pot suppoter, and many, many more. Of course, a
patholigical liar like you will always deny, deny, deny.
Him labeling the anti-war progressives as 'radicals' is another
lie intended to keep the war going as long as possible..
The only people I label as "radicals" are those who favor an immediate
withdrawal of our troops from Iraq. They're a small radical minority
of the American public.
then there is the denial of course..
That's vague. How about something specific that you think applies to
me specifically? Or are vague generalizations all you've got?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
05 Oct 2007 07:11:47 AM |
|
|
Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
The only people I label as "radicals" are those
who favor an immediate withdrawal of our troops
from Iraq.
Here on this planet, the Earth, three and a half
years later is never considered "immediate."
There. By your own definition there are no radicals.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
05 Oct 2007 09:10:43 PM |
|
|
On Oct 5, 5:11 am, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
The only people I label as "radicals" are those
who favor an immediate withdrawal of our troops
from Iraq.
Here on this planet, the Earth, three and a half
years later is never considered "immediate."
There. By your own definition there are no radicals.
Show me the polls that report a majority of Americans want an
immediate withdrawal of our troops from Iraq.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
06 Oct 2007 06:23:46 AM |
|
|
Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Show me the polls that report a majority of
Americans want an immediate withdrawal of
our troops from Iraq.
One. More. Time.
The war started three and a half years ago. The
time for an "Immediate" withdrawal has long
since come and gone. The best we could manage
at this point would be to withdraw some three
and a half years later.
"Lingering for three and a half years" is NOT
withdrawing immediately. Not by any standard
known to man.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pers3id" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
07 Oct 2007 12:56:36 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> Spat the
Words
Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Show me the polls that report a majority of
Americans want an immediate withdrawal of
our troops from Iraq.
Poll finds solid support for Iraq withdrawal, more political pressure
http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2007/09/poll-finds-soli.html
59% of Americans support setting a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-09-18-poll-iraq_N.htm
... and it's not just the US public who feel this way
House Republicans get more restive about Iraq
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2003931075_goprestless07.html
The republican congressmen aren't going to sacrifice their political
careers just so Bush can prove to the world that he really didn't know
what he was doing when he invaded Iraq.
One. More. Time.
The war started three and a half years ago. The
time for an "Immediate" withdrawal has long
since come and gone. The best we could manage
at this point would be to withdraw some three
and a half years later.
"Lingering for three and a half years" is NOT
withdrawing immediately. Not by any standard
known to man.
3 1/2 yrs seems immediate if the goal is to stay there indefinitely.
Stevie has found his little prize (Iraq) and now he just can't give it up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
07 Oct 2007 09:08:53 PM |
|
|
On Oct 7, 10:56 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> Spat
the Words
Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Show me the polls that report a majority of
Americans want an immediate withdrawal of
our troops from Iraq.
Poll finds solid support for Iraq withdrawal, more political pressure
http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2007/09/poll-finds-soli.html
[quoting your source] "Among supporters of a withdrawal timetable, 70%
prefer a gradual withdrawal, 30% an immediate one." [end quoting]
59% of Americans support setting a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-09-18-poll-iraq_N.htm
And of that 59%, only 30% prefer an *immediate* withdrawal. Thanks for
proving my point.
.. and it's not just the US public who feel this way
House Republicans get more restive about Iraq
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2003931075_goprestless...
I'd like to see more political progress within the Iraqi government as
well. And if it doesn't start happening in the very near future, I'll
also favor beginning the withdrawal.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
09 Oct 2007 04:10:43 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191809333.466336.236300@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 7, 10:56 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> Spat
the Words
Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Show me the polls that report a majority of
Americans want an immediate withdrawal of
our troops from Iraq.
Poll finds solid support for Iraq withdrawal, more political pressure
http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2007/09/poll-finds-soli.html
[quoting your source] "Among supporters of a withdrawal timetable, 70%
prefer a gradual withdrawal, 30% an immediate one." [end quoting]
59% of Americans support setting a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-09-18-poll-iraq_N.htm
And of that 59%, only 30% prefer an *immediate* withdrawal. Thanks for
proving my point.
.. and it's not just the US public who feel this way
House Republicans get more restive about Iraq
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2003931075_goprestless...
I'd like to see more political progress within the Iraqi government as
well. And if it doesn't start happening in the very near future, I'll
also favor beginning the withdrawal.
What a humanitarian you are, Stevie.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pers3id" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
09 Oct 2007 09:01:51 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Docrodile"
<swampthing@hellsbayou.net> Spat the Words
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191809333.466336.236300@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 7, 10:56 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> Spat
the Words
Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Show me the polls that report a majority of
Americans want an immediate withdrawal of
our troops from Iraq.
Poll finds solid support for Iraq withdrawal, more political pressure
http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2007/09/poll-finds-soli.html
[quoting your source] "Among supporters of a withdrawal timetable, 70%
prefer a gradual withdrawal, 30% an immediate one." [end quoting]
59% of Americans support setting a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-09-18-poll-iraq_N.htm
And of that 59%, only 30% prefer an *immediate* withdrawal. Thanks for
proving my point.
.. and it's not just the US public who feel this way
House Republicans get more restive about Iraq
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2003931075_goprestless...
I'd like to see more political progress within the Iraqi government as
well. And if it doesn't start happening in the very near future, I'll
also favor beginning the withdrawal.
What a humanitarian you are, Stevie.
I want to see stevie in Iraq fighting for my freedoms. I'm sure he
wouldn't be quite so glib dodging bullets and frag-bombs hidden
underneath the road-kill.
... and stevie has bought into the lie that civilization collapses
without US troops invading other countries <snicker>.. stevie is
such a gullible putz.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
09 Oct 2007 11:59:40 AM |
|
|
On Oct 9, 7:01 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
I want to see stevie in Iraq fighting for my freedoms. I'm sure he
wouldn't be quite so glib dodging bullets and frag-bombs hidden
underneath the road-kill.
I'm a military veteran, Randy. Are you? Do you ever read the milblogs?
Of course you don't. Instead, you mock the troops in Iraq (as
demonstrated by the sarcastic glibness of your "fighting for my
freedoms" remark). Maybe you should start reading some milblogs and
find out what the troops who are actually there have to say. You can
start at the link below, and scroll down to the "Dawn Patrol" section
where you'll find milblogs from troops who are actually serving in
Iraq.
http://www.mudvillegazette.com/
.. and stevie has bought into the lie that civilization collapses
without US troops invading other countries <snicker>.. stevie is
such a gullible putz.
[quoting Randy] "We shouldn't kid ourselves that the mid-east arab
states are going to be more ethical or more humanitarian just because
we want them to. There is still a large gap in understanding between
our culture and theirs, and it seems the only words they really
understand from us right now are force / military power." [end
quoting]
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/98a084ffb35c6acc?hl=en&
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
09 Oct 2007 01:53:58 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191949180.468066.182670@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 9, 7:01 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
I want to see stevie in Iraq fighting for my freedoms. I'm sure he
wouldn't be quite so glib dodging bullets and frag-bombs hidden
underneath the road-kill.
I'm a military veteran, Randy. Are you? Do you ever read the milblogs?
No, I certainly don't. Of course, I'm not a half-witted war monger. I know
you must be famous throughout the grunt cyber community. They mutter your
name even while they count Ollie Norths jumpin' over Edward Kennedy's
dead body while they sleep.
Of course you don't. Instead, you mock the troops in Iraq (as
demonstrated by the sarcastic glibness of your "fighting for my
freedoms" remark).
That is what we hear day after day in the mainstream press reportage, kid.
They're fighting for OUR freedoms. No, they're just senselessly fighting
for oil, ideological maniacs with Jesus' coming utopia on their fevered
minds, big oil barons and all their wily political whores' lies. If one
has any brains at all, one can't help be very cynical and "glib" about the
long 4 year deceptions and manipulations to keep the American public --
and assholes like you -- supporting a useless battle in civil war-torn
Iraq. Of course, they'll soon be telling us we'll have to kill Iranians to
defend our freedoms, too...and then Syrians. Maybe Pakistanis, too,
depending on whether Bhutto one day reasserts her power over the military
dictator Musharoff -- Bush and Cheney's dear friend in the WOT. LOL!
Maybe you should start reading some milblogs and
find out what the troops who are actually there have to say. You can
start at the link below, and scroll down to the "Dawn Patrol" section
where you'll find milblogs from troops who are actually serving in
Iraq.
http://www.mudvillegazette.com/
Well, we are about as interested in finding out what we already know, as
you are interested in Chomsky's detailed bio. Of course, they want to
believe they're over there sacrificing their butts for an altruistic,
heroic purpose. It's fucking hard to get people to die and get injured for
commercial profit and dumbshit political hacks. No one wants to have their
arm or leg blown off for Exxon or Halliburton or any number of
multinational corporations Blackwater is zealously protecting -- ya know,
protecting OUR corporate freedom to make lotsa dough. LOL!
.. and stevie has bought into the lie that civilization collapses
without US troops invading other countries <snicker>.. stevie is
such a gullible putz.
[quoting Randy] "We shouldn't kid ourselves that the mid-east arab
states are going to be more ethical or more humanitarian just because
we want them to. There is still a large gap in understanding between
our culture and theirs, and it seems the only words they really
understand from us right now are force / military power." [end
quoting]
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/98a084ffb35c6acc?hl=en&
You're no one to talk of humanitarianism, you hypocrite and stupid war
supporter. America's leaders have no interest in saving lives, just using
them for their greedy and profitable purposes while Cinderellas like you
dance to their fairyland tunes.
Doc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pers3id" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
09 Oct 2007 09:44:42 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Docrodile"
<swampthing@hellsbayou.net> Spat the Words
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191949180.468066.182670@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 9, 7:01 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
I want to see stevie in Iraq fighting for my freedoms. I'm sure he
wouldn't be quite so glib dodging bullets and frag-bombs hidden
underneath the road-kill.
I'm a military veteran, Randy. Are you? Do you ever read the milblogs?
No, I certainly don't. Of course, I'm not a half-witted war monger.
I don't even read stephen's responses anymore.. he's just that lacking
in credibility. Reading his baloney would be like somebody sane with
above-average iq actually listening to GWB.. it just isn't done.
I know
you must be famous throughout the grunt cyber community. They mutter your
name even while they count Ollie Norths jumpin' over Edward Kennedy's
dead body while they sleep.
Of course you don't. Instead, you mock the troops in Iraq (as
demonstrated by the sarcastic glibness of your "fighting for my
freedoms" remark).
That is what we hear day after day in the mainstream press reportage,
kid.
I don't mock anybody fighting for their lives.. I mock the fruit-baskets
who still believe we're in Iraq fighting 'terrorists' and need a sub-
intellect chimp to do their thinking for them.. stevie would be one of
these fruit-baskets.
They're fighting for OUR freedoms. No, they're just senselessly fighting
for oil, ideological maniacs with Jesus' coming utopia on their fevered
minds, big oil barons and all their wily political whores' lies. If one
has any brains at all, one can't help be very cynical and "glib" about
the
long 4 year deceptions and manipulations to keep the American public --
and assholes like you -- supporting a useless battle in civil war-torn
Iraq. Of course, they'll soon be telling us we'll have to kill Iranians
to
defend our freedoms, too...and then Syrians. Maybe Pakistanis, too,
depending on whether Bhutto one day reasserts her power over the military
dictator Musharoff -- Bush and Cheney's dear friend in the WOT. LOL!
Maybe you should start reading some milblogs and
find out what the troops who are actually there have to say. You can
start at the link below, and scroll down to the "Dawn Patrol" section
where you'll find milblogs from troops who are actually serving in
Iraq.
http://www.mudvillegazette.com/
Well, we are about as interested in finding out what we already know, as
you are interested in Chomsky's detailed bio. Of course, they want to
believe they're over there sacrificing their butts for an altruistic,
heroic purpose. It's fucking hard to get people to die and get injured
for
commercial profit and dumbshit political hacks. No one wants to have
their
arm or leg blown off for Exxon or Halliburton or any number of
multinational corporations Blackwater is zealously protecting -- ya know,
protecting OUR corporate freedom to make lotsa dough. LOL!
.. and stevie has bought into the lie that civilization collapses
without US troops invading other countries <snicker>.. stevie is
such a gullible putz.
[quoting Randy] "We shouldn't kid ourselves that the mid-east arab
states are going to be more ethical or more humanitarian just because
we want them to. There is still a large gap in understanding between
our culture and theirs, and it seems the only words they really
understand from us right now are force / military power." [end
quoting]
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/98a084ffb35c6
acc?hl=en&
You're no one to talk of humanitarianism, you hypocrite and stupid war
supporter.
He never recites my really good quotes where I call him a fruitball
religious zealot. Darn ! There's that whole cherry-picking thing again.
America's leaders have no interest in saving lives, just using
them for their greedy and profitable purposes while Cinderellas like you
dance to their fairyland tunes.
Doc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
09 Oct 2007 09:47:29 PM |
|
|
On Oct 9, 7:44 pm, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Docrodile"
<swampth...@hellsbayou.net> Spat the Words
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191949180.468066.182670@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 9, 7:01 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
I want to see stevie in Iraq fighting for my freedoms. I'm sure he
wouldn't be quite so glib dodging bullets and frag-bombs hidden
underneath the road-kill.
I'm a military veteran, Randy. Are you? Do you ever read the milblogs?
No, I certainly don't. Of course, I'm not a half-witted war monger.
I don't even read stephen's responses anymore..
Yet the only posts you make anymore are either responses to my posts,
or comments about me. Phenomenal, isn't it?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
09 Oct 2007 02:50:05 PM |
|
|
On Oct 9, 11:53 am, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191949180.468066.182670@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 9, 7:01 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
I want to see stevie in Iraq fighting for my freedoms. I'm sure he
wouldn't be quite so glib dodging bullets and frag-bombs hidden
underneath the road-kill.
I'm a military veteran, Randy. Are you? Do you ever read the milblogs?
No, I certainly don't. Of course, I'm not a half-witted war monger.
So that's your opinion of people who put on the uniform of their
country?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
09 Oct 2007 03:02:21 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191959405.622585.118160@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 9, 11:53 am, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191949180.468066.182670@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 9, 7:01 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
I want to see stevie in Iraq fighting for my freedoms. I'm sure he
wouldn't be quite so glib dodging bullets and frag-bombs hidden
underneath the road-kill.
I'm a military veteran, Randy. Are you? Do you ever read the
milblogs?
No, I certainly don't. Of course, I'm not a half-witted war monger.
So that's your opinion of people who put on the uniform of their
country?
No, that's specifically my opinion of you. The rest of my opinions about
the others is that some are patriotic dupes, some are simply career
seekers caught in a war they'd rather ignore, some are antiwar but being
conformist and subject to peer ridicule they simply go along, some are
thrill seekers, some are mama's boys trying to be 'real men' --
stereotypically, that is...and then some are lovers of war and the sick
melodrama it provides in their otherwise directionless, boring lives. Oh,
and I almost forgot, just a few are intelligent but they're the top COs.
The rest are kids fresh outta the nest who didn't have the brains or
ambition to make it as civilians, train for careers, or take full
responsibility for themselves as mature adult individuals. They'd rather
be told what to do, follow an extension of authority figures from their
families' heads, negating all that messy confusing business of trying to
decide what they want for themselves.
Doc
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
10 Oct 2007 05:20:08 AM |
|
|
On 9 Okt, 21:50, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 9, 11:53 am, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191949180.468066.182670@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 9, 7:01 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
I want to see stevie in Iraq fighting for my freedoms. I'm sure he
wouldn't be quite so glib dodging bullets and frag-bombs hidden
underneath the road-kill.
I'm a military veteran, Randy. Are you? Do you ever read the milblogs?
No, I certainly don't. Of course, I'm not a half-witted war monger.
So that's your opinion of people who put on the uniform of their
country?
That's the opinion I have of people who put on the uniform of their
country douglas...if they're off to invade a third world country to
rob them of their oil.
The only time one can be 'proud' to wear the uniform of their country
is if one's country is attacked by another and one is defending it.
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
10 Oct 2007 11:03:32 AM |
|
|
On Oct 10, 3:20 am, WH <boll...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 9 Okt, 21:50, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 9, 11:53 am, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191949180.468066.182670@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 9, 7:01 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
I want to see stevie in Iraq fighting for my freedoms. I'm sure he
wouldn't be quite so glib dodging bullets and frag-bombs hidden
underneath the road-kill.
I'm a military veteran, Randy. Are you? Do you ever read the milblogs?
No, I certainly don't. Of course, I'm not a half-witted war monger.
So that's your opinion of people who put on the uniform of their
country?
That's the opinion I have of people who put on the uniform of their
country douglas...if they're off to invade a third world country to
rob them of their oil.
There's that lie again, liar. The oil belongs to the Iraqi people.
We're not stealing their oil.
The only time one can be 'proud' to wear the uniform of their country
is if one's country is attacked by another and one is defending it.
So you disagree with Wolfy's opinion that the U.S. should have gone to
Europe even sooner than it did during World War II? In your opinion,
the U.S. should have *not* fought Hitler? You and Pat Buchanan. You
have far more in common with Pat Buchanan than I ever have -- or ever
will.
.
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
10 Oct 2007 11:33:58 AM |
|
|
On Oct 10, 12:03 pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 10, 3:20 am, WH <boll...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 9 Okt, 21:50, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 9, 11:53 am, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191949180.468066.182670@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 9, 7:01 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
I want to see stevie in Iraq fighting for my freedoms. I'm sure he
wouldn't be quite so glib dodging bullets and frag-bombs hidden
underneath the road-kill.
I'm a military veteran, Randy. Are you? Do you ever read the milblogs?
No, I certainly don't. Of course, I'm not a half-witted war monger.
So that's your opinion of people who put on the uniform of their
country?
That's the opinion I have of people who put on the uniform of their
country douglas...if they're off to invade a third world country to
rob them of their oil.
There's that lie again, liar. The oil belongs to the Iraqi people.
We're not stealing their oil.
The only time one can be 'proud' to wear the uniform of their country
is if one's country is attacked by another and one is defending it.
So you disagree with Wolfy's opinion that the U.S. should have gone to
Europe even sooner than it did during World War II? In your opinion,
the U.S. should have *not* fought Hitler? You and Pat Buchanan. You
have far more in common with Pat Buchanan than I ever have -- or ever
will.
No, Stevie....you're the Liar. Everyone knows you're a Liar. Even
you know you're a filthy liar.
You're scum, and that's why everyone hates your guts. Look, at the
other liars, that left the group...Even those scumbags realized that
the ship had already sunk....You're the last RAT on the ship - barely
treading water. You're the Last Cockroach, that was too fucking
stupid to realize the light was turned on, and that shoe is about to
squash your ignorant *****. You're the definition of LOSER,
Stevie...it's bcuz of people like you, that the World pretty much
thinks America deserves what it got, and what it will get. More
Terrorism is what America gives, and that's what that ***** will get.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
10 Oct 2007 08:51:45 PM |
|
|
On Oct 10, 9:33 am, eric <ericdavis...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 10, 12:03 pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 10, 3:20 am, WH <boll...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 9 Okt, 21:50, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 9, 11:53 am, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191949180.468066.182670@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 9, 7:01 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
I want to see stevie in Iraq fighting for my freedoms. I'm sure he
wouldn't be quite so glib dodging bullets and frag-bombs hidden
underneath the road-kill.
I'm a military veteran, Randy. Are you? Do you ever read the milblogs?
No, I certainly don't. Of course, I'm not a half-witted war monger.
So that's your opinion of people who put on the uniform of their
country?
That's the opinion I have of people who put on the uniform of their
country douglas...if they're off to invade a third world country to
rob them of their oil.
There's that lie again, liar. The oil belongs to the Iraqi people.
We're not stealing their oil.
The only time one can be 'proud' to wear the uniform of their country
is if one's country is attacked by another and one is defending it.
So you disagree with Wolfy's opinion that the U.S. should have gone to
Europe even sooner than it did during World War II? In your opinion,
the U.S. should have *not* fought Hitler? You and Pat Buchanan. You
have far more in common with Pat Buchanan than I ever have -- or ever
will.
No, Stevie....you're the Liar. <yawn>
You're boring. Come up with something specific or shut the f**k up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
11 Oct 2007 04:22:16 AM |
|
|
On Oct 10, 9:51 pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 10, 9:33 am, eric <ericdavis...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 10, 12:03 pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 10, 3:20 am, WH <boll...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 9 Okt, 21:50, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 9, 11:53 am, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191949180.468066.182670@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 9, 7:01 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
I want to see stevie in Iraq fighting for my freedoms. I'm sure he
wouldn't be quite so glib dodging bullets and frag-bombs hidden
underneath the road-kill.
I'm a military veteran, Randy. Are you? Do you ever read the milblogs?
No, I certainly don't. Of course, I'm not a half-witted war monger.
So that's your opinion of people who put on the uniform of their
country?
That's the opinion I have of people who put on the uniform of their
country douglas...if they're off to invade a third world country to
rob them of their oil.
There's that lie again, liar. The oil belongs to the Iraqi people.
We're not stealing their oil.
The only time one can be 'proud' to wear the uniform of their country
is if one's country is attacked by another and one is defending it.
So you disagree with Wolfy's opinion that the U.S. should have gone to
Europe even sooner than it did during World War II? In your opinion,
the U.S. should have *not* fought Hitler? You and Pat Buchanan. You
have far more in common with Pat Buchanan than I ever have -- or ever
will.
No, Stevie....you're the Liar. <yawn>
You're boring. Come up with something specific or shut the f**k up.
You're a Pathological Liar...you want something
specific?...whatever...what a potpourri to choose from! Anyway...I
repeatedly quoted your loser *****, when you said "Noam Chomsky is a Pol
Pot supporter"...You see, everyone knows that is a lie from the
Pathological Liar. Being a Pathological Liar, you Deny, Deny,
Deny...now that's boring...Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
12 Oct 2007 01:15:39 AM |
|
|
On Oct 11, 2:22 am, eric <ericdavis...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 10, 9:51 pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 10, 9:33 am, eric <ericdavis...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 10, 12:03 pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 10, 3:20 am, WH <boll...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 9 Okt, 21:50, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 9, 11:53 am, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191949180.468066.182670@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 9, 7:01 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
I want to see stevie in Iraq fighting for my freedoms. I'm sure he
wouldn't be quite so glib dodging bullets and frag-bombs hidden
underneath the road-kill.
I'm a military veteran, Randy. Are you? Do you ever read the milblogs?
No, I certainly don't. Of course, I'm not a half-witted war monger.
So that's your opinion of people who put on the uniform of their
country?
That's the opinion I have of people who put on the uniform of their
country douglas...if they're off to invade a third world country to
rob them of their oil.
There's that lie again, liar. The oil belongs to the Iraqi people.
We're not stealing their oil.
The only time one can be 'proud' to wear the uniform of their country
is if one's country is attacked by another and one is defending it.
So you disagree with Wolfy's opinion that the U.S. should have gone to
Europe even sooner than it did during World War II? In your opinion,
the U.S. should have *not* fought Hitler? You and Pat Buchanan. You
have far more in common with Pat Buchanan than I ever have -- or ever
will.
No, Stevie....you're the Liar. <yawn>
You're boring. Come up with something specific or shut the f**k up.
You're a Pathological Liar...you want something
specific?...whatever...what a potpourri to choose from!
Really? And yet all you can come up with is Noam Chomsky, whom I
accurately described as having supported Pol Pot by denying the
reports of the Khmer Rouge genocide, and downplaying the deaths he did
acknowledge by comparing them to the actions of liberated France in
1945. Deal with it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
12 Oct 2007 04:16:27 AM |
|
|
On Oct 12, 2:15 am, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 11, 2:22 am, eric <ericdavis...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 10, 9:51 pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 10, 9:33 am, eric <ericdavis...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 10, 12:03 pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 10, 3:20 am, WH <boll...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 9 Okt, 21:50, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 9, 11:53 am, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191949180.468066.182670@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 9, 7:01 am, Pers3id <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
I want to see stevie in Iraq fighting for my freedoms. I'm sure he
wouldn't be quite so glib dodging bullets and frag-bombs hidden
underneath the road-kill.
I'm a military veteran, Randy. Are you? Do you ever read the milblogs?
No, I certainly don't. Of course, I'm not a half-witted war monger.
So that's your opinion of people who put on the uniform of their
country?
That's the opinion I have of people who put on the uniform of their
country douglas...if they're off to invade a third world country to
rob them of their oil.
There's that lie again, liar. The oil belongs to the Iraqi people.
We're not stealing their oil.
The only time one can be 'proud' to wear the uniform of their country
is if one's country is attacked by another and one is defending it.
So you disagree with Wolfy's opinion that the U.S. should have gone to
Europe even sooner than it did during World War II? In your opinion,
the U.S. should have *not* fought Hitler? You and Pat Buchanan. You
have far more in common with Pat Buchanan than I ever have -- or ever
will.
No, Stevie....you're the Liar. <yawn>
You're boring. Come up with something specific or shut the f**k up.
You're a Pathological Liar...you want something
specific?...whatever...what a potpourri to choose from!
Really? And yet all you can come up with is Noam Chomsky, whom I
accurately described as having supported Pol Pot by denying the
reports of the Khmer Rouge genocide, and downplaying the deaths he did
acknowledge by comparing them to the actions of liberated France in
1945. Deal with it.
You asked for a specific...and that's specific. And specifically
speaking, you did the predictable, and predicted, by stating your bald
faced lie was not at all a lie.
Thanks for proving my point Stevie, you always do.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is Stevie a Patholigical Liar? |
12 Oct 2007 03:25:30 AM |
|
|
Regardless of what "Steven" have said (here) - so far.
At least he has a 'TOTAL' conviction - and a "Totallitarian Belief" -
in his CAUSE !!!
For this, I "Salute" Him.
I may not AGREE with Him - "DIRECTLY"
But, anyone that denies (dis-misses) VISITATIONS from 'PAST' ancestor
(and relatives) - are in 'complete' denial !!!
Your Relatives are "Watching Over You" (as I post this) - more that
you might 'CARE' to acknowledge !!!
The 'Past Life' (and Your Loved Ones) are "Forever Watching Over
You" !!!!
8-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
