Why weren't any of the surrounding buildings damaged ?



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Why weren't any of the surrounding buildings damaged ?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: ""
Date: 30 Sep 2003 01:56:32 PM
Object: Why weren't any of the surrounding buildings damaged ?
Why weren't any of the surrounding buildings damaged ?
_________________________________________________
The WTC is a tall building.
Two tall buildings.
_________________________________________________
.

User: "Karl Kluge"

Title: Re: Why weren't any of the surrounding buildings damaged ? 30 Sep 2003 03:57:19 PM
writes:

Why weren't any of the surrounding buildings damaged ?
_________________________________________________

The WTC is a tall building.

Two tall buildings.

What do you think destroyed the Vista? Have you seen the photo of it after
the collapse of the first tower? Several of the other buildings in the WTC
complex were damaged by the debris from the collapse.
.

User: "Revenant"

Title: Re: Why weren't any of the surrounding buildings damaged ? 30 Sep 2003 02:51:24 PM

Why weren't any of the surrounding buildings damaged ?
_________________________________________________
The WTC is a tall building.

Two tall buildings.

Would you really like an answer to that, or are you more interested in just
assuming there is some sort of a conspiracy theory?
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Why weren't any of the surrounding buildings damaged ? 30 Sep 2003 03:28:11 PM

grub writes:

grub> Why weren't any of the surrounding buildings damaged ?
They were. A number were completely destroyed.
The building directly south had huge dents in
its steel facade, and was still covered with tarps
when I visited about eight months after 9/11.
Are you trolling?
grub> _________________________________________________
grub> The WTC is a tall building.
grub> Two tall buildings.
grub> _________________________________________________
--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
.

User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: Why weren't any of the surrounding buildings damaged ? 30 Sep 2003 05:38:05 PM
In article <v1kjnv4bakim2ctsqv26sb4p31j6m996pf@4ax.com>,
wrote:

Why weren't any of the surrounding buildings damaged ?

They were.
Woods
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER