wikipedia is biased



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > wikipedia is biased

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "Leigh_Bee"
Date: 13 Dec 2004 04:47:11 PM
Object: wikipedia is biased
wikipedia is biased,and is runned by a pornographer.the site claims
anyone may edit its pages but the site is a biased source of
info.please see the sites below.
See www.WikipediaSucks.com
See http://www.247news.net/2004/20041211-wikipedia.shtml
Well I went to that website and thought this fellow has researched the
subject, and given a fair and balanced summation of the "weirdo" known
as Sollog, thought it was bit rich calling Sollog a mystic a misfit
might be closer to the truth, something that seems alien to Mr Ennis.
Funny the debunking focuses on a predilection, rather than the mans
stated aims, but below the belt is the Sollog stock in trade or is
that tirade?
Oh I would have been proud to pen an article like that, clear no
nonsense.
Nice to see a clear debunking without even trying.
LB
.

 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER