| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"TruthSeeker" |
| Date: |
02 Apr 2004 02:31:25 AM |
| Object: |
Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog Believe So... |
Sollog released the 1111 Prophecy in November of last year.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=PBgsb.19783%248x2.7897523%40newssrv26.news.prodigy.com
About two weeks after the release of the prophecy, Stephen King, who is
directly mentionned in the prophecy, was hospitalized for pneumonia. Here's
an explanation:
http://247news.net/2003/20031127-stephenking.shtml
In the prophecy Sollog mentions a Great Quake occuring on the "triple 04".
One interpretation of triple 04 is 04/04/04 or April 4, 2004. He says the
quake will occur on the harvest of the full moon. The full moon of April is
on the 5th.
So will a great quake occur on 04/04/04 possibly striking a city Sollog has
been warning of? (for example Los Angelos) Time will tell...
.
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Butt" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog BelieveSo... |
10 Apr 2004 12:35:26 AM |
|
|
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
TruthSeeker wrote:
Hahaha. A quake struck on the Full Moon just as predicted.
Here's a link to the prophecy:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=1111+prophecy&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=PBgsb.19783%248x2.7897523%40newssrv26.news.prodigy.com&rnum=7
Here's a post from the Sollog forum:
***********************
Info on last 6.5+ quake at USGS
http://eqint.cr.usgs.gov/neic/cgi-bin/epic/epic.cgi?SEARCHMETHOD=1&FILEFORMAT=4&SEARCHRANGE=HH&SYEAR=2004&SMONTH=01&SDAY=01&EYEAR=2004&EMONTH=04&EDAY=06&LMAG=6.5&UMAG=9.9&NDEP1=&NDEP2=&IO1=&IO2=&SLAT2=0.0&SLAT1=0.0&SLON2=0.0&SLON1=0.0&CLAT=0.0&CLON=0.0&CRAD=0&SUBMIT=Submit+Sear
It shows not one 6.5+ quake struck anywhere in the world since 2/21
Yet morons in usenet will say no big deal, 6.5+ quakes happen all the time
haha
FACT it struck 4/5/04 ONE NUMBER OFF but yet on a date mentioned (FULL MOON
OF APRIL 2004)
So in other words you missed. Again.
The only way it missed is if you can show it didn't occur on the 5th.
Good luck
fucktard. A rare quake stuck on the day he said one would. Very simple
and very
obvious if you have one brain cell.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog BelieveSo... |
10 Apr 2004 03:48:08 AM |
|
|
Never anonymous Butt wrote:
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
TruthSeeker wrote:
Hahaha. A quake struck on the Full Moon just as predicted.
Here's a link to the prophecy:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=1111+prophecy&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=PBgsb.19783%248x2.7897523%40newssrv26.news.prodigy.com&rnum=7
Here's a post from the Sollog forum:
***********************
Info on last 6.5+ quake at USGS
http://eqint.cr.usgs.gov/neic/cgi-bin/epic/epic.cgi?SEARCHMETHOD=1&FILEFORMAT=4&SEARCHRANGE=HH&SYEAR=2004&SMONTH=01&SDAY=01&EYEAR=2004&EMONTH=04&EDAY=06&LMAG=6.5&UMAG=9.9&NDEP1=&NDEP2=&IO1=&IO2=&SLAT2=0.0&SLAT1=0.0&SLON2=0.0&SLON1=0.0&CLAT=0.0&CLON=0.0&CRAD=0&SUBMIT=Submit+Sear
It shows not one 6.5+ quake struck anywhere in the world since 2/21
Yet morons in usenet will say no big deal, 6.5+ quakes happen all the time
haha
FACT it struck 4/5/04 ONE NUMBER OFF but yet on a date mentioned (FULL MOON
OF APRIL 2004)
So in other words you missed. Again.
The only way it missed is if you can show it didn't occur on the 5th.
It isn't the only way, but I needn't worry since it occured on the 6th.
Good luck
fucktard. A rare quake stuck on the day he said one would. Very simple
and very
obvious if you have one brain cell.
Except it it didn't hit on the 5th. And 'many' did not 'perish'. And
your "rare quakes" happen on average every two weeks. And your 'fans'
(i.e. you) used up your guess when you crowed it would strike LA. And
'Elana' sounds strangely nothing like 'Hindu Kush'.
Another steaming turd of a prediction from the worst prophet in the world.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Butt" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog BelieveSo... |
10 Apr 2004 06:26:37 AM |
|
|
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Never anonymous Butt wrote:
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
TruthSeeker wrote:
Hahaha. A quake struck on the Full Moon just as predicted.
Here's a link to the prophecy:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=1111+prophecy&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=PBgsb.19783%248x2.7897523%40newssrv26.news.prodigy.com&rnum=7
Here's a post from the Sollog forum:
***********************
Info on last 6.5+ quake at USGS
http://eqint.cr.usgs.gov/neic/cgi-bin/epic/epic.cgi?SEARCHMETHOD=1&FILEFORMAT=4&SEARCHRANGE=HH&SYEAR=2004&SMONTH=01&SDAY=01&EYEAR=2004&EMONTH=04&EDAY=06&LMAG=6.5&UMAG=9.9&NDEP1=&NDEP2=&IO1=&IO2=&SLAT2=0.0&SLAT1=0.0&SLON2=0.0&SLON1=0.0&CLAT=0.0&CLON=0.0&CRAD=0&SUBMIT=Submit+
It shows not one 6.5+ quake struck anywhere in the world since 2/21
Yet morons in usenet will say no big deal, 6.5+ quakes happen all the time
haha
FACT it struck 4/5/04 ONE NUMBER OFF but yet on a date mentioned (FULL MOON
OF APRIL 2004)
So in other words you missed. Again.
The only way it missed is if you can show it didn't occur on the 5th.
It isn't the only way, but I needn't worry since it occured on the 6th.
haha!! read it and weep you delusional liar.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsww/Quakes/usgxce.htm
Are you actually stupid enough to try and contradict a science fact?
USGS says Magnitude 6.6 - HINDU KUSH REGION, AFGHANISTAN
2004 April 5 21:24:04 UTC
All that needs to be shown for a direct date hit is for USGS to show any
data that the quake hit on april 5th. They do. You're ***** outta luck.
Admit
the hit, you little ***** and stop trying to deny something you'll look
more and more stupid the longer you do.
But as pointed out which you didn't want to answer, is the fact that if
it did hit on
the 6th and there was no reference to the 5th, it still would be
considered
by seismological standards in quake prediction as a hit with incredible
accuracy. I dare you to try to argue that fact.
Good luck
fucktard. A rare quake stuck on the day he said one would. Very simple
and very
obvious if you have one brain cell.
Except it it didn't hit on the 5th.
except USGS says it did. This link from USGS is proof for anyone to see
you're lying:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsww/Quakes/usgxce.htm
"A strong earthquake occurred at 21:24:04 (UTC) on Monday, April 5,
2004. The magnitude 6.6 event has been located in the HINDU KUSH REGION,
AFGHANISTAN. (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.) "
The quake struck on the 5th. No matter how much you deny that fact, it
won't
change what the USGS says. You can cry and whine all day about how it
was
the 6th local time in the US, but all that has to be shown is any data
from USGS
saying 5th.
So let me post the proof once again so that everyone here not in denial
can
see
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsww/Quakes/usgxce.htm
"A strong earthquake occurred at 21:24:04 (UTC) on Monday, April 5,
2004. The magnitude 6.6 event has been located in the HINDU KUSH REGION,
AFGHANISTAN. (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.) "
Notice how USGS seismologist writes the word "Monday"
Notice also how April 5th magically appears.
And you continue to deny what a USGS seismologist concludes? Haha! Proof
that everyone can see you're in denial and flat out lying for personal
dislike reasons.
Bottom line, The one thing you refuse to admit is that data from USGS
itself gives two dates. 5th and 6th. But also, as pointed out which
you also refused to argue, is that the quake happening on the 6th still
fits within sollogs one off code not to mention being 1 day off
in quake predicting is still an allowed window to claim a direct hit and
for you to say miss amidst those facts, shows why you're nothing more
than a lying fool in denial and that your opinion on quake predicting
carries no merit whatsoever. And lest we not forget no one else supports
what you're trying to argue about a miss. No one, because they can see
that
the USGS data validates the hit.
And 'many' did not 'perish'. And
your "rare quakes" happen on average every two weeks.
This quake was a rare event and occurred on the date sollog said to look
for one. 6.6's don't occur every 2 weeks on average liar.
A direct hit by any seismological standard.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog BelieveSo... |
10 Apr 2004 07:18:21 AM |
|
|
Never anonymous Butt wrote:
haha!! read it and weep you delusional liar.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsww/Quakes/usgxce.htm
Are you actually stupid enough to try and contradict a science fact?
USGS says Magnitude 6.6 - HINDU KUSH REGION, AFGHANISTAN
2004 April 5 21:24:04 UTC
All that needs to be shown for a direct date hit is for USGS to show any
data that the quake hit on april 5th. They do. You're ***** outta luck.
Sadly for you kook it happened on the 6th local time, many did not
perish, it didn't hit LA, it had no 4/4/4 significance of any kind and
Elana is not Hindu Kush.
It was a miss kook.
.
|
|
|
| User: "TruthSeeker" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog Believe So... |
10 Apr 2004 01:02:49 PM |
|
|
"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:c58omc036k@news4.newsguy.com...
Never anonymous Butt wrote:
haha!! read it and weep you delusional liar.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsww/Quakes/usgxce.htm
Are you actually stupid enough to try and contradict a science fact?
USGS says Magnitude 6.6 - HINDU KUSH REGION, AFGHANISTAN
2004 April 5 21:24:04 UTC
All that needs to be shown for a direct date hit is for USGS to show any
data that the quake hit on april 5th. They do. You're ***** outta luck.
Sadly for you kook it happened on the 6th local time, many did not
perish, it didn't hit LA, it had no 4/4/4 significance of any kind and
Elana is not Hindu Kush.
It happened on the 5th est time(time all Sollog's prophecies are written
in), at least one person did die, the prophecy NEVER said it would be in LA,
it occured one day from 04/04/04 and the time was 4:24:04 est standard.
Elana is not a region on Earth dumb *****. It's another word for Earth. So
Elana=Earth, dummy.
Hit!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog BelieveSo... |
11 Apr 2004 04:02:57 AM |
|
|
TruthSeeker wrote:
"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:c58omc036k@news4.newsguy.com...
Never anonymous Butt wrote:
haha!! read it and weep you delusional liar.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsww/Quakes/usgxce.htm
Are you actually stupid enough to try and contradict a science fact?
USGS says Magnitude 6.6 - HINDU KUSH REGION, AFGHANISTAN
2004 April 5 21:24:04 UTC
All that needs to be shown for a direct date hit is for USGS to show any
data that the quake hit on april 5th. They do. You're ***** outta luck.
Sadly for you kook it happened on the 6th local time, many did not
perish, it didn't hit LA, it had no 4/4/4 significance of any kind and
Elana is not Hindu Kush.
It happened on the 5th est time(time all Sollog's prophecies are written
in),
Hang on you were bleating just now we should UTC. Of course it's neither
since it struck in the morning of the 6th local time.
at least one person did die,
So many didn't perish then.
the prophecy NEVER said it would be in LA,
No but those 'fans' sure did.
it occured one day from 04/04/04 and the time was 4:24:04 est standard.
Too bad it didn't happen EST.
Elana is not a region on Earth dumb *****. It's another word for Earth. So
Elana=Earth, dummy.
So your amazing prediction says a quake will happen somewhere on earth.
Wow that is so specific.
But of course it is pretty obvious why you stuck this made up word in
there. If a quake had by chance struck LA you'd be bleating it about
eL-Ana etc.
Hit!
A miserable miss. Like usual.
Take the meds loony.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Butt" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog BelieveSo... |
15 Apr 2004 07:47:20 AM |
|
|
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Never anonymous Butt wrote:
haha!! read it and weep you delusional liar.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsww/Quakes/usgxce.htm
Are you actually stupid enough to try and contradict a science fact?
USGS says Magnitude 6.6 - HINDU KUSH REGION, AFGHANISTAN
2004 April 5 21:24:04 UTC
All that needs to be shown for a direct date hit is for USGS to show any
data that the quake hit on april 5th. They do. You're ***** outta luck.
Sadly for you kook it happened on the 6th local time,
Even if it did happen on the 6th, and it didn't, conveniently, you
ignored and evaded the rest of what I pointed out because obviously you
know it shows a direct hit and makes no difference if it was 1 day off
because everyone knows earthquake predictions are measured for their
accuracy. Any seismologist measuring this prediction would say to be
within even +/- 3-5 days for this type of earthquake, is among the most
accurate predictions on record. Now you can blow your brains out stupid.
I find it interesting no one but you is arguing that 1 day off is a
miss.
Thats because only a total idiot would try to say a quake prediction
occurring 1 day off isn't accurate or close. You sir, are a fool.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog BelieveSo... |
15 Apr 2004 03:59:37 PM |
|
|
Never anonymous Butt wrote:
I find it interesting no one but you is arguing that 1 day off is a
miss.
And no one but you and other sock puppets is arguing it is a hit. I
wonder why.
Take the meds kook. Your predictive powerz are as feeble as usual.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Butt" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog Believe So... |
10 Apr 2004 12:39:07 AM |
|
|
Stop arguing with blunder boy Truthseeker. You're trying to reason
simple logic and obvious facts with a total fool. Everyone here can see
how
accurate this hit is. Thats why no one but blunder is arguing the
hit. They have what blunder doesn't; 1 brain cell.
TruthSeeker wrote:
"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:c4us2p01nns@news1.newsguy.com...
TruthSeeker wrote:
Hahaha. A quake struck on the Full Moon just as predicted.
Here's a link to the prophecy:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=1111+prophecy&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=PBgsb.19783%248x2.7897523%40newssrv26.news.prodigy.com&rnum=7
Here's a post from the Sollog forum:
***********************
Info on last 6.5+ quake at USGS
http://eqint.cr.usgs.gov/neic/cgi-bin/epic/epic.cgi?SEARCHMETHOD=1&FILEFORMAT=4&SEARCHRANGE=HH&SYEAR=2004&SMONTH=01&SDAY=01&EYEAR=2004&EMONTH=04&EDAY=06&LMAG=6.5&UMAG=9.9&NDEP1=&NDEP2=&IO1=&IO2=&SLAT2=0.0&SLAT1=0.0&SLON2=0.0&SLON1=0.0&CLAT=0.0&CLON=0.0&CRAD=0&SUBMIT=Submit+Search
It shows not one 6.5+ quake struck anywhere in the world since 2/21
Yet morons in usenet will say no big deal, 6.5+ quakes happen all the
time
haha
FACT it struck 4/5/04 ONE NUMBER OFF but yet on a date mentioned (FULL
MOON
OF APRIL 2004)
So in other words you missed. Again.
Do you even know what would be considered a miss?? By your ridiculous
definition of a "miss", I could say that a rare magnitude 7.0 quake will
occur on a certain day, and if instead a magnitude 6.7 quake occured you
would call it a "miss". However, you don't realize that even a 6.7 is a
rare event. You can't say that the prediction totally missed, you have to
analyze the degree of error. Unfortunately, you're too stupid to do that...
The same argument applies to the date being off by one. The magnitude 6.5
quake(6.8 as reported by Pakistan's Seismological Center) that struck on
04/05/04 was a unique event, because a quake of that magnitude had not been
seen for more than a month! And it just happens to occur one day off from
04/04/04. Being one day off on a quake prediction is such a small degree of
error that it can be ignored! Are you aware that there is no method to date
that allows us to successfully predict earthquakes? But you're too stupid
to realize this fact.
And the fact is Sollog did point to 04/05/04 as being the actual date of the
quake because he put FULL MOON in all caps. And the full moon of April just
happens to be on the 5th! That's just one of Sollog's codes that have been
used many times in his prophecies.
Not only that, but the exact time of the quake was encoded into the prophecy
as well. Sollog mentionned the quake occuring on the triple 4. The time of
the quake was 4:24:04 EST. See the triple 4 you moron?? Add to that the
fact that the quake struck only one day off from 04/04/04 and you have an
undeniable hit!
Here, read the prophecy again, you illiterate fool:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=1111+prophecy&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=PBgsb.19783%248x2.7897523%40newssrv26.news.prodigy.com&rnum=7
Aren't you getting tired of being verbally defeated over and over? You
can't even argue on my level. I present facts, while you present bias
remarks... You will never win.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog BelieveSo... |
07 Apr 2004 03:52:10 PM |
|
|
TruthSeeker wrote:
"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:c4us2p01nns@news1.newsguy.com...
TruthSeeker wrote:
Hahaha. A quake struck on the Full Moon just as predicted.
Here's a link to the prophecy:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=1111+prophecy&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=PBgsb.19783%248x2.7897523%40newssrv26.news.prodigy.com&rnum=7
Here's a post from the Sollog forum:
***********************
Info on last 6.5+ quake at USGS
http://eqint.cr.usgs.gov/neic/cgi-bin/epic/epic.cgi?SEARCHMETHOD=1&FILEFORMAT=4&SEARCHRANGE=HH&SYEAR=2004&SMONTH=01&SDAY=01&EYEAR=2004&EMONTH=04&EDAY=06&LMAG=6.5&UMAG=9.9&NDEP1=&NDEP2=&IO1=&IO2=&SLAT2=0.0&SLAT1=0.0&SLON2=0.0&SLON1=0.0&CLAT=0.0&CLON=0.0&CRAD=0&SUBMIT=Submit+Search
It shows not one 6.5+ quake struck anywhere in the world since 2/21
Yet morons in usenet will say no big deal, 6.5+ quakes happen all the
time
haha
FACT it struck 4/5/04 ONE NUMBER OFF but yet on a date mentioned (FULL
MOON
OF APRIL 2004)
So in other words you missed. Again.
Do you even know what would be considered a miss?? By your ridiculous
definition of a "miss", I could say that a rare magnitude 7.0 quake will
occur on a certain day, and if instead a magnitude 6.7 quake occured you
would call it a "miss". However, you don't realize that even a 6.7 is a
rare event. You can't say that the prediction totally missed, you have to
analyze the degree of error. Unfortunately, you're too stupid to do that...
The same argument applies to the date being off by one. The magnitude 6.5
quake(6.8 as reported by Pakistan's Seismological Center) that struck on
04/05/04 was a unique event, because a quake of that magnitude had not been
seen for more than a month! And it just happens to occur one day off from
04/04/04.
Yeah right.
Except of course it happened on the 6th.
Being one day off on a quake prediction is such a small degree of
error that it can be ignored!
No it can't and it was two days.
Are you aware that there is no method to date
that allows us to successfully predict earthquakes? But you're too stupid
to realize this fact.
And the fact is Sollog did point to 04/05/04 as being the actual date of the
quake because he put FULL MOON in all caps.
Except the full moon was the 5th, not the 6th.
And the full moon of April just
happens to be on the 5th! That's just one of Sollog's codes that have been
used many times in his prophecies.
Not only that, but the exact time of the quake was encoded into the prophecy
as well. Sollog mentionned the quake occuring on the triple 4. The time of
the quake was 4:24:04 EST.
Except local time isn't EST and you just chose that from your usual
fishing expedition.
See the triple 4 you moron??
Yeah I see it. You desperately searched around fudging numbers until you
found it. Didn't you say just recently that you didn't do this?
Add to that the
fact that the quake struck only one day off from 04/04/04 and you have an
undeniable hit!
Two days off kook and and an undeniable miss. That's before even noting
your usual blather about 'many perishing' when the death toll appears to
stand at 1. Or your usual ***** routine of having 'fans' predict a
quake LA and then sweeping that under the rug when it missed.
We all prostrate ourselves before the worst prophet in the world.
Take the meds kook. Or rather don't since it has been a while since your
last meltdown and we could all do with a laugh.
.
|
|
|
| User: "TruthSeeker" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog Believe So... |
07 Apr 2004 07:53:46 PM |
|
|
"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:c51plq0283b@news2.newsguy.com...
TruthSeeker wrote:
"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:c4us2p01nns@news1.newsguy.com...
TruthSeeker wrote:
Hahaha. A quake struck on the Full Moon just as predicted.
Here's a link to the prophecy:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=1111+prophecy&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=PBgsb.19783%248x2.7897523%40newssrv26.news.prodigy.com&rnum=7
Here's a post from the Sollog forum:
***********************
Info on last 6.5+ quake at USGS
http://eqint.cr.usgs.gov/neic/cgi-bin/epic/epic.cgi?SEARCHMETHOD=1&FILEFORMAT=4&SEARCHRANGE=HH&SYEAR=2004&SMONTH=01&SDAY=01&EYEAR=2004&EMONTH=04&EDAY=06&LMAG=6.5&UMAG=9.9&NDEP1=&NDEP2=&IO1=&IO2=&SLAT2=0.0&SLAT1=0.0&SLON2=0.0&SLON1=0.0&CLAT=0.0&CLON=0.0&CRAD=0&SUBMIT=Submit+Search
It shows not one 6.5+ quake struck anywhere in the world since 2/21
Yet morons in usenet will say no big deal, 6.5+ quakes happen all the
time
haha
FACT it struck 4/5/04 ONE NUMBER OFF but yet on a date mentioned (FULL
MOON
OF APRIL 2004)
So in other words you missed. Again.
Do you even know what would be considered a miss?? By your ridiculous
definition of a "miss", I could say that a rare magnitude 7.0 quake will
occur on a certain day, and if instead a magnitude 6.7 quake occured you
would call it a "miss". However, you don't realize that even a 6.7 is a
rare event. You can't say that the prediction totally missed, you have
to
analyze the degree of error. Unfortunately, you're too stupid to do
that...
The same argument applies to the date being off by one. The magnitude
6.5
quake(6.8 as reported by Pakistan's Seismological Center) that struck on
04/05/04 was a unique event, because a quake of that magnitude had not
been
seen for more than a month! And it just happens to occur one day off
from
04/04/04.
Yeah right.
Except of course it happened on the 6th.
Sollog writes all of his prophecies in EST time. Every single prophecy he's
ever written has been in EST. Look at the very bottom of the page to see
that Sollog gives the exact time that he wrote the prophecy and the time is
11:11 EST. Duh!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=1111+prophecy&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=PBgsb.19783%248x2.7897523%40newssrv26.news.prodigy.com&rnum=7
All of his past quake predictions also had time windows that were aligned to
the easter time zone.
Being one day off on a quake prediction is such a small degree of
error that it can be ignored!
No it can't and it was two days.
I've already proved it was one day, when you use eastern time( the time in
which the prophecy was written!)
Are you aware that there is no method to date
that allows us to successfully predict earthquakes? But you're too
stupid
to realize this fact.
And the fact is Sollog did point to 04/05/04 as being the actual date of
the
quake because he put FULL MOON in all caps.
Except the full moon was the 5th, not the 6th.
Thanks for pointing out an obvious fact...
And the full moon of April just
happens to be on the 5th! That's just one of Sollog's codes that have
been
used many times in his prophecies.
Not only that, but the exact time of the quake was encoded into the
prophecy
as well. Sollog mentionned the quake occuring on the triple 4. The
time of
the quake was 4:24:04 EST.
Except local time isn't EST and you just chose that from your usual
fishing expedition.
I've already showed how the prophecy was written in eastern time, like all
of Sollog's prophecies. Therefore it is perfectly logical to use EST time
when analyzing the quake. Are you done yet?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Butt" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog Believe So... |
10 Apr 2004 12:13:58 AM |
|
|
This is where blunder boy disappears from the thread after running out
of excuses and stupid logic to disprove facts. ;o)
TruthSeeker wrote:
"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:c51plq0283b@news2.newsguy.com...
TruthSeeker wrote:
"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:c4us2p01nns@news1.newsguy.com...
TruthSeeker wrote:
Hahaha. A quake struck on the Full Moon just as predicted.
Here's a link to the prophecy:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=1111+prophecy&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=PBgsb.19783%248x2.7897523%40newssrv26.news.prodigy.com&rnum=7
Here's a post from the Sollog forum:
***********************
Info on last 6.5+ quake at USGS
http://eqint.cr.usgs.gov/neic/cgi-bin/epic/epic.cgi?SEARCHMETHOD=1&FILEFORMAT=4&SEARCHRANGE=HH&SYEAR=2004&SMONTH=01&SDAY=01&EYEAR=2004&EMONTH=04&EDAY=06&LMAG=6.5&UMAG=9.9&NDEP1=&NDEP2=&IO1=&IO2=&SLAT2=0.0&SLAT1=0.0&SLON2=0.0&SLON1=0.0&CLAT=0.0&CLON=0.0&CRAD=0&SUBMIT=Submit+Search
It shows not one 6.5+ quake struck anywhere in the world since 2/21
Yet morons in usenet will say no big deal, 6.5+ quakes happen all the
time
haha
FACT it struck 4/5/04 ONE NUMBER OFF but yet on a date mentioned (FULL
MOON
OF APRIL 2004)
So in other words you missed. Again.
Do you even know what would be considered a miss?? By your ridiculous
definition of a "miss", I could say that a rare magnitude 7.0 quake will
occur on a certain day, and if instead a magnitude 6.7 quake occured you
would call it a "miss". However, you don't realize that even a 6.7 is a
rare event. You can't say that the prediction totally missed, you have
to
analyze the degree of error. Unfortunately, you're too stupid to do
that...
The same argument applies to the date being off by one. The magnitude
6.5
quake(6.8 as reported by Pakistan's Seismological Center) that struck on
04/05/04 was a unique event, because a quake of that magnitude had not
been
seen for more than a month! And it just happens to occur one day off
from
04/04/04.
Yeah right.
Except of course it happened on the 6th.
Sollog writes all of his prophecies in EST time. Every single prophecy he's
ever written has been in EST. Look at the very bottom of the page to see
that Sollog gives the exact time that he wrote the prophecy and the time is
11:11 EST. Duh!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=1111+prophecy&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=PBgsb.19783%248x2.7897523%40newssrv26.news.prodigy.com&rnum=7
All of his past quake predictions also had time windows that were aligned to
the easter time zone.
Being one day off on a quake prediction is such a small degree of
error that it can be ignored!
No it can't and it was two days.
I've already proved it was one day, when you use eastern time( the time in
which the prophecy was written!)
Are you aware that there is no method to date
that allows us to successfully predict earthquakes? But you're too
stupid
to realize this fact.
And the fact is Sollog did point to 04/05/04 as being the actual date of
the
quake because he put FULL MOON in all caps.
Except the full moon was the 5th, not the 6th.
Thanks for pointing out an obvious fact...
And the full moon of April just
happens to be on the 5th! That's just one of Sollog's codes that have
been
used many times in his prophecies.
Not only that, but the exact time of the quake was encoded into the
prophecy
as well. Sollog mentionned the quake occuring on the triple 4. The
time of
the quake was 4:24:04 EST.
Except local time isn't EST and you just chose that from your usual
fishing expedition.
I've already showed how the prophecy was written in eastern time, like all
of Sollog's prophecies. Therefore it is perfectly logical to use EST time
when analyzing the quake. Are you done yet?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Butt" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog BelieveSo... |
10 Apr 2004 12:31:07 AM |
|
|
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
TruthSeeker wrote:
"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:c4us2p01nns@news1.newsguy.com...
TruthSeeker wrote:
Hahaha. A quake struck on the Full Moon just as predicted.
Here's a link to the prophecy:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=1111+prophecy&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=PBgsb.19783%248x2.7897523%40newssrv26.news.prodigy.com&rnum=7
Here's a post from the Sollog forum:
***********************
Info on last 6.5+ quake at USGS
http://eqint.cr.usgs.gov/neic/cgi-bin/epic/epic.cgi?SEARCHMETHOD=1&FILEFORMAT=4&SEARCHRANGE=HH&SYEAR=2004&SMONTH=01&SDAY=01&EYEAR=2004&EMONTH=04&EDAY=06&LMAG=6.5&UMAG=9.9&NDEP1=&NDEP2=&IO1=&IO2=&SLAT2=0.0&SLAT1=0.0&SLON2=0.0&SLON1=0.0&CLAT=0.0&CLON=0.0&CRAD=0&SUBMIT=Submit+Sear
It shows not one 6.5+ quake struck anywhere in the world since 2/21
Yet morons in usenet will say no big deal, 6.5+ quakes happen all the
time
haha
FACT it struck 4/5/04 ONE NUMBER OFF but yet on a date mentioned (FULL
MOON
OF APRIL 2004)
So in other words you missed. Again.
Do you even know what would be considered a miss?? By your ridiculous
definition of a "miss", I could say that a rare magnitude 7.0 quake will
occur on a certain day, and if instead a magnitude 6.7 quake occured you
would call it a "miss". However, you don't realize that even a 6.7 is a
rare event. You can't say that the prediction totally missed, you have to
analyze the degree of error. Unfortunately, you're too stupid to do that...
The same argument applies to the date being off by one. The magnitude 6.5
quake(6.8 as reported by Pakistan's Seismological Center) that struck on
04/05/04 was a unique event, because a quake of that magnitude had not been
seen for more than a month! And it just happens to occur one day off from
04/04/04.
Yeah right.
Except of course it happened on the 6th.
No. it happened on the 5th. Why do you lie? oh, I know, because any
other
response would show a direct hit for sollog.
Being one day off on a quake prediction is such a small degree of
error that it can be ignored!
No it can't and it was two days.
Many lessor quake predictors and siesomologists have proclaimed direct
hits using windows that extend up to a week later. Being that this
quake
struck within 1 day of the 4th and precisely on the Full Moon makes this
prediction far more accurate than any prediction from any other
predictors.
Sollog did specifically say to expect a rare quake on the Full Moon. Any
USGS chart can be checked which will verify this quake hit on the 5th
EST.
You can't possibly prove those facts false. Any attempt will make you
look
far more retarded and desperate than you are known to be. Admit the hit,
you little *****.
Are you aware that there is no method to date
that allows us to successfully predict earthquakes? But you're too stupid
to realize this fact.
And the fact is Sollog did point to 04/05/04 as being the actual date of the
quake because he put FULL MOON in all caps.
Except the full moon was the 5th, not the 6th.
You do realize you've just admitted the hit right?
And the full moon of April just
happens to be on the 5th! That's just one of Sollog's codes that have been
used many times in his prophecies.
Not only that, but the exact time of the quake was encoded into the prophecy
as well. Sollog mentionned the quake occuring on the triple 4. The time of
the quake was 4:24:04 EST.
Except local time isn't EST and you just chose that from your usual
fishing expedition.
Aside from that point being a lie, the fact the quake struck within
a 1 day window, shows an accuracy beyond any other prediction or
predictor
on record. You're just too stupid to see past your bias.
See the triple 4 you moron??
Yeah I see it. You desperately searched around fudging numbers until you
found it. Didn't you say just recently that you didn't do this?
Only thing is that anyone can check to see there was no fudging of
numbers.
You claim there was, but can't prove it. Nothing but your usual spew of
lies
because you can't handle the facts.
Add to that the
fact that the quake struck only one day off from 04/04/04 and you have an
undeniable hit!
Two days off
1 day off blunder boy. Even if everyone agreed he was 2 off, any
seismologist
would agree giving a 1 week window for a rare quake to hit, is
incredible
accuracy. You and maybe 1 other person here is trying to deny the
obvious
hit. The rest can see what you're too stupid and ignorant to admit. Its
a direct hit, which is why everyone is so quiet now.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Henry" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog Believe So... |
10 Apr 2004 11:52:45 AM |
|
|
Hi, Never anonymous Butt! This is a friendly line to let people know who
I'm talking to!
Sollog did specifically say to expect a rare quake on the Full Moon. Any
USGS chart can be checked which will verify this quake hit on the 5th
EST.
So? Are you still playing this game? Tell us again how Easter Island is
in the middle of Argentina, you fuckin' fraud. Go on, explain how it's a
"drect hit" when you claim a quake will hit Easter Island and it hits three
thousand miles away, but then you refuse to give the same credence to a
quake which hits Hawaii when it was predicted for Alaska, even though the
distances separating the locations in question are almost *identical*.
Dance, Pennis. Dance.
--
John Henry
www.lowgenius.com
If I were you, I'd be listening to Marshall Tucker Band - Can't You See
.
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Butt" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog Believe So... |
15 Apr 2004 07:50:26 AM |
|
|
John Henry wrote:
Hi, Never anonymous Butt! This is a friendly line to let people know who
I'm talking to!
Sollog did specifically say to expect a rare quake on the Full Moon. Any
USGS chart can be checked which will verify this quake hit on the 5th
EST.
So? Are you still playing this game? Tell us again how Easter Island is
in the middle of Argentina,
Thats already been done many times if you look at the google archive.
It also shows how you were never able to refute the facts.
you fuckin' fraud.
meltdown noted.
and failure to prove sollog a fraud noted as well.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Henry" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog Believe So... |
15 Apr 2004 01:11:56 PM |
|
|
Hi, Never anonymous Butt! This is a friendly line to let people know
who I'm talking to!
John Henry wrote:
Hi, Never anonymous Butt! This is a friendly line to let people know
who I'm talking to!
Sollog did specifically say to expect a rare quake on the Full
Moon. Any USGS chart can be checked which will verify this quake
hit on the 5th EST.
So? Are you still playing this game? Tell us again how Easter
Island is in the middle of Argentina,
Thats already been done many times if you look at the google archive.
It also shows how you were never able to refute the facts.
No it hasn't. What has been done is a bunch of dancing and whining.
you fuckin' fraud.
meltdown noted.
Says a guy who regularly profits (well, attempts to profit) from the
tragedy of others - earthquakes, terrorism, plane crashes, assassination.
Your entire existence is a meltdown, P.Enis.
and failure to prove sollog a fraud noted as well.
There is no such person as "sollog." The person styling himself as such
is just some stupid loser named John P.Enis who routinely gets himself
laughed out of any and all concievable circles of respectable society and
has adopted this paper-thin pretense of mysticism to shore up his badly
bruised ego.
--
John Henry
www.lowgenius.com
If you were me, you'd be listening to Winamp stopped
remove 'henry' and spamblocks to reply
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we
are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic
and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog BelieveSo... |
02 Apr 2004 07:09:53 AM |
|
|
TruthSeeker wrote:
Slopshit hasn't got any fans, just a bunch of sock puppets.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog Believe So... |
02 Apr 2004 08:24:35 AM |
|
|
"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:c4jon0026kq@news1.newsguy.com...
Slopshit hasn't got any fans, just a bunch of sock puppets.
Which is the whole point, if something does happen these muppets
will claim ennis predicted it and if it doesn't they'll claim it's
only speculation on their part. That's how ennis and his sheep
play their pathetic game.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Saint Isidore of Laytonville" |
|
| Title: Re: Will a Great Quake Occur on 04/04/04? Fans of Sollog Believe So... |
02 Apr 2004 09:42:39 PM |
|
|
Nope. I gave the fault a 12 week lock using crazy glue!
The Psychedelick Pope
Saint Isidore of Laytonville
^Ö^ Patron Saint of the Internet ^Ö^
°°^Ö^ °°
http://apple2.org.za/gswv/me
AOXOMOXOA and ENESSA QUA ONNICA
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
