THE ORWELLIAN GLOBAL STATE:
THE NEXT STAGE BEGINS
GEORGE BUSH LAUNCHES SECOND TERM
BUT WILL HE FINISH IT?
By David Icke
Inauguration day 2005 marks the beginning of the next, and even more
extreme, stage of the Orwellian global state. If anyone thought the
first Bush term breached the realms of insanity, they'd better hold on
and strap in.
The new Bush cabinet is dominated to an even greater extent by the
Illuminati neocon conspirators behind 9/11, the invasions of
Afghanistan and Iraq, and the removal of basic human freedoms. The
appointment of Condoleezza Rice has ensured that the State Department
will be at one with the wingnuts at the Pentagon, and Stephen Hadley,
the National Security Advisor, will 'advise' whatever his close
associates, Rice and Cheney, tell him to.
In the new Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, we have a man with a
criminal disregard for human rights and civil liberties, and Michael
Chertoff, the new head 'Homeland Security', played a leading role in
drafting U.S. 'anti-terror' laws in the wake of 9/11 that removed
basic freedoms from the American people. As we have seen with purges
at the CIA, FBI and elsewhere, any personnel not 'on message'
throughout the government and its agencies have been, or are being,
systematically removed from positions of influence.
The prime centres of government, military, legal, and economic power
are all occupied by extremists who either want to set the world ablaze
or will unquestioningly serve those who do.
There is no need to speculate on the agenda these sick people will
follow in the next four years. It was detailed by the neocon front,
the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), in its September 2000
document, Strategies, Forces and Resources For A New Century. This
proposed a 'blueprint for maintaining global U.S. pre-eminence,
precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the
international security order in line with American principles and
interests'. What it called this 'American grand strategy' had to be
advanced 'as far into the future as possible' and it says that the
U.S. must 'fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major
theatre wars' as a 'core mission'. American armed forces were
described as 'the cavalry on the new American frontier' and these were
the very policies pursued in the first Bush term. The report also
said:
#
Allies like the UK are 'the most effective and efficient means of
exercising American global leadership'.
#
Peacekeeping missions demand 'American political leadership rather
than that of the United Nations'.
#
Even should Saddam pass from the scene, bases in Saudi Arabia and
Kuwait will remain permanently, despite domestic opposition in the
Gulf regimes to the stationing of U.S. troops, as 'Iran may well prove
as large a threat to U.S. interests as Iraq has'.
#
North Korea, Libya, Syria and Iran are dangerous regimes and their
existence justifies the creation of a “world-wide command-and-control
system” [World Army]. It was a neocon speech writer, David Frum, who
wrote Bush's State of the Union address which talked of an 'Axis of
Evil' – Iraq, Iran and North Korea.
#
China should be targeted for 'regime change' and the report says 'it
is time to increase the presence of American forces in Southeast Asia'
that may lead to 'American and allied power providing the spur to the
process of democratisation in China'.
'U.S. Space Forces' should dominate space and it calls for the total
control of cyberspace to prevent 'enemies' [anyone exposing the
agenda] using the Internet against the U.S.
#
The U.S. should consider the use of biological weapons and that 'new'
methods of attack - electronic, 'non-lethal', biological - will be
more widely available ... combat likely will take place in new
dimensions, in space, cyberspace, and perhaps the world of microbes
.... advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific
genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to
a politically useful tool.
Note the language: 'specific genotypes' – the biological targeting of
specific races. Who said Hitler was dead? While following this fascist
agenda, the same people had the nerve to say that Iraq must be invaded
because it had biological weapons.
Condoleezza Rice continued this neocon theme in the days before the
inauguration when she talked about 'outposts of tyranny' where the
U.S. must help 'bring freedom'. She named them as Iran, North Korea,
Cuba, Zimbabwe, Burma and Belarus. Bush's inauguration speech, written
for him by his neocon handlers, included lines such as: 'The survival
of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty
in other lands'. And: 'The best hope for peace in our world is the
expansion of freedom in all the world'. This is Orwellian-speak for
'we have other lands to conquer' and key to their strategy is Iran and
North Korea. The latter target is connected to the neocon plans for a
conflict with China, which borders North Korea.
When I say 'they,' or the 'neocons,' I don't mean America; I mean the
forces that control America. The agenda has nothing to do with
America's best interests – look at the demolition of its economy and
currency alone in the wake of its wars of conquest. This is about
using America to destroy America as a super power, both economically
and militarily, because a super power and the planned world
dictatorship do not go together. Thus, they want both America and
China to destroy each other and come under the heel of the global
fascist state.
So, where do they go from here? The Illuminati/neocon attacks of
September 11th provided the excuse to invade the strategically-placed
Afghanistan and this momentum led on to the invasion and occupation of
Iraq. But now they are bogged down and stretched to the limits
militarily and, in the light of the lies about weapons of mass
destruction, the U.S. and British governments have lost all
credibility with vast numbers of their electorate. For Bush or Blair
to say they have to invade Iran because of 'weapons of mass
destruction' would be met with both hysterical laughter and massive
opposition, especially in the UK where Blair and mendacity have become
synonymous in the public mind.
This leaves them with two options: to drop the agenda for further
conquest (no chance); or to orchestrate another 9/11-style 'problem'
that they could blame on their next target, almost certainly Iran. I
wouldn't expect them to wait too long to begin the process now Bush
has launched his second term. This 'problem' could be nuclear or
chemical attacks on the United States, maybe Britain and other
targets, too. It could be any number of potential horrors (problem) to
terrify the people (reaction) that would lead to 'retaliation' against
the fall-guy country (solution). This would allow them to justify to
the gullible sections of the population the unleashing of 'shock and
awe' against yet another nation. It would also be the excuse to
introduce the military draft.
Bush and co denied before the election that they planned compulsory
military service, but this was just another blatant lie. They are
already at the limit of their capability using those in uniform by
choice and without an enormous influx of battle-fodder they could not
possibly 'fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major
theatre wars' as a 'core mission'. To expand into other regions they
need the young and not-so-young of America to fight and die for their
cause of human enslavement. That means the draft.
One event that would pull all these strands together would be the
assassination of President Bush and I certainly would not rule it out.
It would not change the neocon policy if Bush were removed because
he's just a front man for them and if he were killed the next
president would be the neocon super-extremist, the brutal and horrific
***** Cheney. The benefits of a Bush assassination would be enormous to
the Illuminati and their neocons. It would have such a massive effect
on the American collective psyche that the draft could be introduced
and other wars launched with a fraction of the opposition they would
otherwise face. It is certainly a possibility in my view.
(See Tales from the Time Loop for the detailed background to the
neocons)
Link URL for websites
http://www.davidicke.com/icke/articles2005/busharticle.html
.
|
|
| User: "Nonsequiturlexa" |
|
| Title: Re: Will Bush finish second term? |
05 Feb 2005 01:56:19 PM |
|
|
Subject: Will Bush finish second term?
From:
Date: 2/4/2005 10:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <hlq8019gj1r75pakia0m701elsl4sdem77@4ax.com>
THE ORWELLIAN GLOBAL STATE:
THE NEXT STAGE BEGINS
GEORGE BUSH LAUNCHES SECOND TERM
BUT WILL HE FINISH IT?
By David Icke
Inauguration day 2005 marks the beginning of the next, and even more
extreme, stage of the Orwellian global state. If anyone thought the
first Bush term breached the realms of insanity, they'd better hold on
and strap in.
The new Bush cabinet is dominated to an even greater extent by the
Illuminati neocon conspirators behind 9/11, the invasions of
Afghanistan and Iraq, and the removal of basic human freedoms. The
appointment of Condoleezza Rice has ensured that the State Department
will be at one with the wingnuts at the Pentagon, and Stephen Hadley,
the National Security Advisor, will 'advise' whatever his close
associates, Rice and Cheney, tell him to.
In the new Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, we have a man with a
criminal disregard for human rights and civil liberties, and Michael
Chertoff, the new head 'Homeland Security', played a leading role in
drafting U.S. 'anti-terror' laws in the wake of 9/11 that removed
basic freedoms from the American people. As we have seen with purges
at the CIA, FBI and elsewhere, any personnel not 'on message'
throughout the government and its agencies have been, or are being,
systematically removed from positions of influence.
The prime centres of government, military, legal, and economic power
are all occupied by extremists who either want to set the world ablaze
or will unquestioningly serve those who do.
There is no need to speculate on the agenda these sick people will
follow in the next four years. It was detailed by the neocon front,
the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), in its September 2000
document, Strategies, Forces and Resources For A New Century. This
proposed a 'blueprint for maintaining global U.S. pre-eminence,
precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the
international security order in line with American principles and
interests'. What it called this 'American grand strategy' had to be
advanced 'as far into the future as possible' and it says that the
U.S. must 'fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major
theatre wars' as a 'core mission'. American armed forces were
described as 'the cavalry on the new American frontier' and these were
the very policies pursued in the first Bush term. The report also
said:
#
Allies like the UK are 'the most effective and efficient means of
exercising American global leadership'.
#
Peacekeeping missions demand 'American political leadership rather
than that of the United Nations'.
#
Even should Saddam pass from the scene, bases in Saudi Arabia and
Kuwait will remain permanently, despite domestic opposition in the
Gulf regimes to the stationing of U.S. troops, as 'Iran may well prove
as large a threat to U.S. interests as Iraq has'.
#
North Korea, Libya, Syria and Iran are dangerous regimes and their
existence justifies the creation of a “world-wide command-and-control
system” [World Army]. It was a neocon speech writer, David Frum, who
wrote Bush's State of the Union address which talked of an 'Axis of
Evil' – Iraq, Iran and North Korea.
#
China should be targeted for 'regime change' and the report says 'it
is time to increase the presence of American forces in Southeast Asia'
that may lead to 'American and allied power providing the spur to the
process of democratisation in China'.
'U.S. Space Forces' should dominate space and it calls for the total
control of cyberspace to prevent 'enemies' [anyone exposing the
agenda] using the Internet against the U.S.
#
The U.S. should consider the use of biological weapons and that 'new'
methods of attack - electronic, 'non-lethal', biological - will be
more widely available ... combat likely will take place in new
dimensions, in space, cyberspace, and perhaps the world of microbes
... advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific
genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to
a politically useful tool.
Note the language: 'specific genotypes' – the biological targeting of
specific races. Who said Hitler was dead? While following this fascist
agenda, the same people had the nerve to say that Iraq must be invaded
because it had biological weapons.
Condoleezza Rice continued this neocon theme in the days before the
inauguration when she talked about 'outposts of tyranny' where the
U.S. must help 'bring freedom'. She named them as Iran, North Korea,
Cuba, Zimbabwe, Burma and Belarus. Bush's inauguration speech, written
for him by his neocon handlers, included lines such as: 'The survival
of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty
in other lands'. And: 'The best hope for peace in our world is the
expansion of freedom in all the world'. This is Orwellian-speak for
'we have other lands to conquer' and key to their strategy is Iran and
North Korea. The latter target is connected to the neocon plans for a
conflict with China, which borders North Korea.
When I say 'they,' or the 'neocons,' I don't mean America; I mean the
forces that control America. The agenda has nothing to do with
America's best interests – look at the demolition of its economy and
currency alone in the wake of its wars of conquest. This is about
using America to destroy America as a super power, both economically
and militarily, because a super power and the planned world
dictatorship do not go together. Thus, they want both America and
China to destroy each other and come under the heel of the global
fascist state.
So, where do they go from here? The Illuminati/neocon attacks of
September 11th provided the excuse to invade the strategically-placed
Afghanistan and this momentum led on to the invasion and occupation of
Iraq. But now they are bogged down and stretched to the limits
militarily and, in the light of the lies about weapons of mass
destruction, the U.S. and British governments have lost all
credibility with vast numbers of their electorate. For Bush or Blair
to say they have to invade Iran because of 'weapons of mass
destruction' would be met with both hysterical laughter and massive
opposition, especially in the UK where Blair and mendacity have become
synonymous in the public mind.
This leaves them with two options: to drop the agenda for further
conquest (no chance); or to orchestrate another 9/11-style 'problem'
that they could blame on their next target, almost certainly Iran. I
wouldn't expect them to wait too long to begin the process now Bush
has launched his second term. This 'problem' could be nuclear or
chemical attacks on the United States, maybe Britain and other
targets, too. It could be any number of potential horrors (problem) to
terrify the people (reaction) that would lead to 'retaliation' against
the fall-guy country (solution). This would allow them to justify to
the gullible sections of the population the unleashing of 'shock and
awe' against yet another nation. It would also be the excuse to
introduce the military draft.
Bush and co denied before the election that they planned compulsory
military service, but this was just another blatant lie. They are
already at the limit of their capability using those in uniform by
choice and without an enormous influx of battle-fodder they could not
possibly 'fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major
theatre wars' as a 'core mission'. To expand into other regions they
need the young and not-so-young of America to fight and die for their
cause of human enslavement. That means the draft.
One event that would pull all these strands together would be the
assassination of President Bush and I certainly would not rule it out.
It would not change the neocon policy if Bush were removed because
he's just a front man for them and if he were killed the next
president would be the neocon super-extremist, the brutal and horrific
***** Cheney. The benefits of a Bush assassination would be enormous to
the Illuminati and their neocons. It would have such a massive effect
on the American collective psyche that the draft could be introduced
and other wars launched with a fraction of the opposition they would
otherwise face. It is certainly a possibility in my view.
(See Tales from the Time Loop for the detailed background to the
neocons)
Link URL for websites
http://www.davidicke.com/icke/articles2005/busharticle.html
http://www.davidicke.com/
He's a 'Chicken Queen'. The
rainbow and youthful face give
that away at first glance on his
web site.
Patron Saint of the Internet
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nonsequiturlexa" |
|
| Title: Re: Will Bush finish second term? |
05 Feb 2005 01:52:23 PM |
|
|
I predict the answer is a two letter word
that begins with -> N
Patron Saint of the Internet
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
