|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Will the Republican party split over the immigration issue? |
21 Jan 2004 06:29:45 PM |
|
|
In article <20040121070819.27224.00000481@mb-m11.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
arnold_holbrook@mailcity.com
wrote:
And create a third party?
We had our chance in 2000 with Pat Buchanan.
Unfortunately, ont about 1,000,000 of us had enough sense to vote for him.
Had Buchanan been elected, chances are good that 9-11 may not have happened, we
never would have gone to war with Iraq, and we would be shipping illegal's back
home.
You're probably right about all of the above. Had he not been aligned with the
Religious Right, he probably would have gotten a lot more votes.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Will the Republican party split over the immigration issue? |
22 Jan 2004 06:25:19 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
arnold_holbrook@mailcity.com
wrote:
And create a third party?
We had our chance in 2000 with Pat Buchanan.
Unfortunately, ont about 1,000,000 of us had enough sense to vote for him.
Had Buchanan been elected, chances are good that 9-11 may not have happened,
we
never would have gone to war with Iraq, and we would be shipping illegal's
back
home.
You're probably right about all of the above. Had he not been aligned with
the
Religious Right, he probably would have gotten a lot more votes.
Woods
Shows how much you know, most of the socalled Religious Right, were firmly in
the corner of President Bush.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Will the Republican party split over the immigration issue? |
22 Jan 2004 06:08:45 PM |
|
|
In article <20040122072519.21861.00000406@mb-m14.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
arnold_holbrook@mailcity.com
wrote:
And create a third party?
We had our chance in 2000 with Pat Buchanan.
Unfortunately, ont about 1,000,000 of us had enough sense to vote for him.
Had Buchanan been elected, chances are good that 9-11 may not have happened,
we
never would have gone to war with Iraq, and we would be shipping illegal's
back
home.
You're probably right about all of the above. Had he not been aligned with
the
Religious Right, he probably would have gotten a lot more votes.
Woods
Shows how much you know, most of the socalled Religious Right, were firmly in
the corner of President Bush.
Naturally, I meant that he may have gotten the more moderate Republican votes.
There are quite a few of them out there, you know, and they aren't exactly
enamored of the Religious Right.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Will the Republican party split over the immigration issue? |
23 Jan 2004 03:06:08 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
arnold_holbrook@mailcity.com
wrote:
And create a third party?
We had our chance in 2000 with Pat Buchanan.
Unfortunately, ont about 1,000,000 of us had enough sense to vote for him.
Had Buchanan been elected, chances are good that 9-11 may not have
happened,
we
never would have gone to war with Iraq, and we would be shipping illegal's
back
home.
You're probably right about all of the above. Had he not been aligned with
the
Religious Right, he probably would have gotten a lot more votes.
Woods
Shows how much you know, most of the socalled Religious Right, were firmly
in
the corner of President Bush.
Naturally, I meant that he may have gotten the more moderate Republican
votes.
There are quite a few of them out there, you know, and they aren't exactly
enamored of the Religious Right.
Woods
You just contradicted yourself, again.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Will the Republican party split over the immigration issue? |
23 Jan 2004 06:46:05 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040123040608.18883.00000567@mb-m28.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
arnold_holbrook@mailcity.com
wrote:
And create a third party?
We had our chance in 2000 with Pat Buchanan.
Unfortunately, ont about 1,000,000 of us had enough sense to vote for
him.
Had Buchanan been elected, chances are good that 9-11 may not have
happened,
we
never would have gone to war with Iraq, and we would be shipping
illegal's
back
home.
You're probably right about all of the above. Had he not been aligned
with
the
Religious Right, he probably would have gotten a lot more votes.
Woods
Shows how much you know, most of the socalled Religious Right, were
firmly
in
the corner of President Bush.
Naturally, I meant that he may have gotten the more moderate Republican
votes.
There are quite a few of them out there, you know, and they aren't
exactly
enamored of the Religious Right.
Woods
You just contradicted yourself, again.
No, Tony, you just proved you can't read and understand a thread. Again.
I notice you're very quiet about all those planes in Iraq that keep getting
hit by MANPADS at low altitude and surviving.. mentally papering over the
gaping cracks in your paranoid fantasies eh?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Will the Republican party split over the immigration issue? |
23 Jan 2004 04:38:47 PM |
|
|
In article <20040123040608.18883.00000567@mb-m28.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
arnold_holbrook@mailcity.com
wrote:
And create a third party?
We had our chance in 2000 with Pat Buchanan.
Unfortunately, ont about 1,000,000 of us had enough sense to vote for him.
Had Buchanan been elected, chances are good that 9-11 may not have
happened,
we
never would have gone to war with Iraq, and we would be shipping illegal's
back
home.
You're probably right about all of the above. Had he not been aligned with
the
Religious Right, he probably would have gotten a lot more votes.
Woods
Shows how much you know, most of the socalled Religious Right, were firmly
in
the corner of President Bush.
Naturally, I meant that he may have gotten the more moderate Republican
votes.
There are quite a few of them out there, you know, and they aren't exactly
enamored of the Religious Right.
Woods
You just contradicted yourself, again.
No, I didn't - you just can't seem to grasp what I'm saying. Not a big deal -
I was just basically agreeing with you and stating why I agreed.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
