Cheney directs surfers to anti-Bush site
VP's incorrect Web address redirects traffic to a George Soros page
lambasting President Bush.
http://money.cnn.com/2004/10/06/technology/cheney_soros/index.htm
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Vice President ***** Cheney told viewers Tuesday
night they could verify his claims from the vice-presidential debate at
an independent Web site -- www.factcheck.com -- but visitors to the site
found a searing anti-Bush message.
Cheney accidentally said ".com" instead of ".org" during the televised
debate.
Internet surfers who visited factcheck.com were redirected to the home
page of billionaire anti-Bush activist George Soros, with the statement
"Why we must not re-elect President Bush" at the top of the screen.
The Soros site also claims "President Bush is endangering our safety,
hurting our vital interests, and undermining American values."
The Web site Cheney had apparently meant to shuttle viewers to is:
www.factcheck.org, run by the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the
University of Pennsylvania. The site www.factcheck.com has no connection
to Soros; it was simply redirecting traffic to his site.
Factcheck.com is owned by Name Administration Inc., a Cayman Islands
company that acquires Web domain names and makes money off the traffic
by redirecting surfers to text ads, the Wall Street Journal reported
Wednesday.
A spokesman for Soros told the newspaper that he "was as surprised by it
as everyone else," adding that George Soros does not own the domain name
factcheck.com and doesn't know why traffic to that site is being
redirected to his home page.
When Cheney mentioned the wrong site during the debate, Name
Administration officials saw nearly 50,000 visitors click on the site in
the first hour, up from 200 visits a day, said the report.
Employees sent traffic to the Soros site based on their own political
views, not because of any intervention from Soros, the newspaper report
said. =A0
.
|
|
| User: " John F Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
07 Oct 2004 06:55:46 AM |
|
|
"Su Zanadu" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:5274-4165207E-302@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net...
Cheney directs surfers to anti-Bush site
VP's incorrect Web address redirects traffic to a George Soros page
lambasting President Bush.
Rumsfeld's latest statements at the CFR, Bremer's recent statements about
low troop levels in Iraq, now this. Who's running this team? The same guy
that "competently" orchestrated and managed the invasion?
Just a reminder here. Bremer had doubts about Bush's competence before
9/11. In a speech in Wheaton Illinois on 2-6-2001 he said that the
administration was "paying no attention to terrorism". This backs up *****
Clarke's criticism.
Sounds to me like we need some focused, mature leadership in Washington
during this dangerous time.
Article originating with the Associated Press:
http://www.avonhistory.org/mil3/knew.htm
``Bremer Faulted Bush Before Terror Attacks
WASHINGTON (AP) -- L. Paul Bremer, the U.S. administrator in Iraq, said in a
speech six months before the Sept. 11 attacks that the Bush administration
was "paying no attention" to terrorism.
"What they will do is stagger along until there's a major incident and then
suddenly say, 'Oh my God, shouldn't we be organized to deal with this,'"
Bremer said at a McCormick Tribune Foundation conference on terrorism on
February 26, 2001.
Bremer spoke at the conference shortly after he chaired the National
Commission on Terrorism, a bipartisan body formed by the Clinton
administration to examine U.S. counterterrorism policies ...
The foundation is a charitable organization founded by Robert McCormick,
former editor and publisher of The Chicago Tribune.
At the speech, delivered in Wheaton, Ill., Bremer, whose diplomatic jobs
included a stint as ambassador-at-large for counterterrorism, said a war
against terrorism would be unending.
"If you call it a war, you suggest there's a victory," he said. "I would
argue there is no final victory in the war against terrorism any more than
there is in the so-called war against crime."''
.
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
07 Oct 2004 08:35:12 PM |
|
|
John wrote:
Rumsfeld's latest statements at the
CFR, Bremer's recent statements about
low troop levels in Iraq, now this. Who's
running this team? The same guy that
"competently" orchestrated and
managed the invasion?
Just a reminder here. Bremer had doubts
about Bush's competence before 9/11.
In a speech in Wheaton Illinois on
2-6-2001 he said that the administration
was "paying no attention to terrorism".
This backs up ***** Clarke's criticism.
Sounds to me like we need some
focused, mature leadership in
Washington during this dangerous time.
He's *just* a redneck John.
We have Jethro Clampet living in OUR WHITE HOUSE!
And he wants to renew the lease for 4 more years.....THAT SCARES ME!
And a good half of my friends, family and neighbors are staunch
supporters of him. It is so creepy! It is like they are brainwashed or
under some sort of spell.
Don't they listen to what is going on or do they hear only what they
want to hear? I don't understand it.
It's going to be a close one.
Article originating with the Associated
Press:
http://www.avonhistory.org/mil3/knew.htm
``Bremer Faulted Bush Before Terror
Attacks
WASHINGTON (AP) -- L. Paul Bremer,
the U.S. administrator in Iraq, said in a
speech six months before the Sept. 11
attacks that the Bush administration was
"paying no attention" to terrorism.
.
|
|
|
| User: " John F Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
10 Oct 2004 08:16:32 AM |
|
|
"Su Zanadu" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:5274-4165EED0-407@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net...
And he wants to renew the lease for 4 more years.....THAT SCARES ME!
You know, I've heard people say things like this before when it came to a
presidential candidate. Things always seemed to work out. But this time
around I'm with you. Concern is warranted.
And a good half of my friends, family and neighbors are staunch
supporters of him. It is so creepy! It is like they are brainwashed or
under some sort of spell.
Don't they listen to what is going on or do they hear only what they
want to hear? I don't understand it.
I was talking to my son on the way to the woods yesterday morning, talking
about the president's obvious wriggling on the invasion, the first president
since Hoover to have a net loss on jobs over 4 years, dangerous economic
policies that will continue to whittle away the middle class. He graduated
from college with a business major, marketing minor and can't understand why
people don't see it.
There's a book out there called "Born To Buy" about how marketers brainwash
kids at an early age. Establish brand recognition at as early as 18 months
in children. We have a society that's based on acquisition, the need to
happily buy.
A lot of people won't question what's fed to them. They'll go along with
what ever is best for the system and get a happy meal to go with their
*****-licking imperialist fartitude. God bless America.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
10 Oct 2004 08:32:00 AM |
|
|
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message
news:s4-dnYCm8M3JqvTcRVn-sQ@locallink.net...
"Su Zanadu" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:5274-4165EED0-407@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net...
And he wants to renew the lease for 4 more years.....THAT SCARES ME!
You know, I've heard people say things like this before when it came to a
presidential candidate. Things always seemed to work out. But this time
around I'm with you. Concern is warranted.
And a good half of my friends, family and neighbors are staunch
supporters of him. It is so creepy! It is like they are brainwashed or
under some sort of spell.
Don't they listen to what is going on or do they hear only what they
want to hear? I don't understand it.
I was talking to my son on the way to the woods yesterday morning, talking
about the president's obvious wriggling on the invasion, the first
president
since Hoover to have a net loss on jobs over 4 years, dangerous economic
policies that will continue to whittle away the middle class. He
graduated
from college with a business major, marketing minor and can't understand
why
people don't see it.
There's a book out there called "Born To Buy" about how marketers
brainwash
kids at an early age. Establish brand recognition at as early as 18
months
in children. We have a society that's based on acquisition, the need to
happily buy.
A lot of people won't question what's fed to them. They'll go along with
what ever is best for the system and get a happy meal to go with their
*****-licking imperialist fartitude. God bless America.
I think it's called conditioning. If you hammer home a point ( regardless of
whether it's valid or not ) over and over again it will seep into a person's
subconcious. They won't be sure where they heard or how they came to such a
conclusion, but they will believe it to be a fact. Facts don't require
questioning.
Case in point is the surveys where over 70% of US citizens believed Saddam
was responsible for 9-11. Where did this come from? Bush-Chenery repeatedly
using the words 'Sept 11th' and 'Saddam' over and over again in the same
sentence.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.771 / Virus Database: 518 - Release Date: 9/28/04
.
|
|
|
| User: " John F Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
10 Oct 2004 01:33:14 PM |
|
|
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvin@galaxy.com> wrote in message
news:iRaad.4417$hk6.24130@news20.bellglobal.com...
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message
news:s4-dnYCm8M3JqvTcRVn-sQ@locallink.net...
"Su Zanadu" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:5274-4165EED0-407@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net...
And he wants to renew the lease for 4 more years.....THAT SCARES ME!
You know, I've heard people say things like this before when it came to
a
presidential candidate. Things always seemed to work out. But this
time
around I'm with you. Concern is warranted.
And a good half of my friends, family and neighbors are staunch
supporters of him. It is so creepy! It is like they are brainwashed or
under some sort of spell.
Don't they listen to what is going on or do they hear only what they
want to hear? I don't understand it.
I was talking to my son on the way to the woods yesterday morning,
talking
about the president's obvious wriggling on the invasion, the first
president
since Hoover to have a net loss on jobs over 4 years, dangerous economic
policies that will continue to whittle away the middle class. He
graduated
from college with a business major, marketing minor and can't understand
why
people don't see it.
There's a book out there called "Born To Buy" about how marketers
brainwash
kids at an early age. Establish brand recognition at as early as 18
months
in children. We have a society that's based on acquisition, the need to
happily buy.
A lot of people won't question what's fed to them. They'll go along
with
what ever is best for the system and get a happy meal to go with their
*****-licking imperialist fartitude. God bless America.
I think it's called conditioning. If you hammer home a point ( regardless
of
whether it's valid or not ) over and over again it will seep into a
person's
subconcious. They won't be sure where they heard or how they came to such
a
conclusion, but they will believe it to be a fact. Facts don't require
questioning.
Case in point is the surveys where over 70% of US citizens believed Saddam
was responsible for 9-11. Where did this come from? Bush-Chenery
repeatedly
using the words 'Sept 11th' and 'Saddam' over and over again in the same
sentence.
Yup, excellent point. Scary idea that "mind control" is that well
established, that simple.
Kids can see as many as 40,000 commercials a year. Constant non questioning
information consuming to make an unquestioning, dependant long term
consumer. It all brings your well-being, your security.
The fact of the matter is that our system is dependant on acquisition and
consumption. Comfort and things constitute the holy grail. I'm sure the
coming generations will make fine little imperialists. There'll just be a
greater gap between the elite and the worker/killer bees. It's gotta be
that way.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
12 Oct 2004 02:23:11 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:33:14 -0400, " John F Lemke"
<jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvin@galaxy.com> wrote in message
news:iRaad.4417$hk6.24130@news20.bellglobal.com...
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message
news:s4-dnYCm8M3JqvTcRVn-sQ@locallink.net...
"Su Zanadu" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:5274-4165EED0-407@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net...
And he wants to renew the lease for 4 more years.....THAT SCARES ME!
You know, I've heard people say things like this before when it came to
a
presidential candidate. Things always seemed to work out. But this
time
around I'm with you. Concern is warranted.
And a good half of my friends, family and neighbors are staunch
supporters of him. It is so creepy! It is like they are brainwashed or
under some sort of spell.
Don't they listen to what is going on or do they hear only what they
want to hear? I don't understand it.
I was talking to my son on the way to the woods yesterday morning,
talking
about the president's obvious wriggling on the invasion, the first
president
since Hoover to have a net loss on jobs over 4 years, dangerous economic
policies that will continue to whittle away the middle class. He
graduated
from college with a business major, marketing minor and can't understand
why
people don't see it.
There's a book out there called "Born To Buy" about how marketers
brainwash
kids at an early age. Establish brand recognition at as early as 18
months
in children. We have a society that's based on acquisition, the need to
happily buy.
A lot of people won't question what's fed to them. They'll go along
with
what ever is best for the system and get a happy meal to go with their
*****-licking imperialist fartitude. God bless America.
I think it's called conditioning. If you hammer home a point ( regardless
of
whether it's valid or not ) over and over again it will seep into a
person's
subconcious. They won't be sure where they heard or how they came to such
a
conclusion, but they will believe it to be a fact. Facts don't require
questioning.
Case in point is the surveys where over 70% of US citizens believed Saddam
was responsible for 9-11. Where did this come from? Bush-Chenery
repeatedly
using the words 'Sept 11th' and 'Saddam' over and over again in the same
sentence.
Yup, excellent point. Scary idea that "mind control" is that well
established, that simple.
Absofuckinlootly too. ;-) Media conditioning is what moulds one's
point of view.
Kids can see as many as 40,000 commercials a year. Constant non questioning
information consuming to make an unquestioning, dependant long term
consumer. It all brings your well-being, your security.
The fact of the matter is that our system is dependant on acquisition and
consumption. Comfort and things constitute the holy grail. I'm sure the
coming generations will make fine little imperialists. There'll just be a
greater gap between the elite and the worker/killer bees. It's gotta be
that way.
It's good to know that the realisation is sinking in slowly.
Unfortunately the media conditioning is sinking in faster and more
people are hooked on what they're led to believe by the media as
opposed to understanding the concept of marketting - and that
marketting does not just apply to commerce.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
12 Oct 2004 02:15:35 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 09:32:00 -0400, "Marvin The Paranoid Android"
<marvin@galaxy.com> wrote:
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message
news:s4-dnYCm8M3JqvTcRVn-sQ@locallink.net...
"Su Zanadu" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:5274-4165EED0-407@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net...
And he wants to renew the lease for 4 more years.....THAT SCARES ME!
You know, I've heard people say things like this before when it came to a
presidential candidate. Things always seemed to work out. But this time
around I'm with you. Concern is warranted.
And a good half of my friends, family and neighbors are staunch
supporters of him. It is so creepy! It is like they are brainwashed or
under some sort of spell.
Don't they listen to what is going on or do they hear only what they
want to hear? I don't understand it.
I was talking to my son on the way to the woods yesterday morning, talking
about the president's obvious wriggling on the invasion, the first
president
since Hoover to have a net loss on jobs over 4 years, dangerous economic
policies that will continue to whittle away the middle class. He
graduated
from college with a business major, marketing minor and can't understand
why
people don't see it.
There's a book out there called "Born To Buy" about how marketers
brainwash
kids at an early age. Establish brand recognition at as early as 18
months
in children. We have a society that's based on acquisition, the need to
happily buy.
A lot of people won't question what's fed to them. They'll go along with
what ever is best for the system and get a happy meal to go with their
*****-licking imperialist fartitude. God bless America.
I think it's called conditioning. If you hammer home a point ( regardless of
whether it's valid or not ) over and over again it will seep into a person's
subconcious. They won't be sure where they heard or how they came to such a
conclusion, but they will believe it to be a fact. Facts don't require
questioning.
Case in point is the surveys where over 70% of US citizens believed Saddam
was responsible for 9-11. Where did this come from? Bush-Chenery repeatedly
using the words 'Sept 11th' and 'Saddam' over and over again in the same
sentence.
Absofuckinlootly.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
08 Oct 2004 05:40:24 AM |
|
|
"Su Zanadu" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:5274-4165EED0-407@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net...
John wrote:
Rumsfeld's latest statements at the
CFR, Bremer's recent statements about
low troop levels in Iraq, now this. Who's
running this team? The same guy that
"competently" orchestrated and
managed the invasion?
Just a reminder here. Bremer had doubts
about Bush's competence before 9/11.
In a speech in Wheaton Illinois on
2-6-2001 he said that the administration
was "paying no attention to terrorism".
This backs up ***** Clarke's criticism.
Sounds to me like we need some
focused, mature leadership in
Washington during this dangerous time.
He's *just* a redneck John.
We have Jethro Clampet living in OUR WHITE HOUSE!
And he wants to renew the lease for 4 more years.....THAT SCARES ME!
And a good half of my friends, family and neighbors are staunch
supporters of him. It is so creepy! It is like they are brainwashed or
under some sort of spell.
Don't they listen to what is going on or do they hear only what they
want to hear? I don't understand it.
It's going to be a close one.
THAT's the scarey part. I find it completely out of sync with any form of
logic that anyone would even consider voitng for this moron.
He's had the fewest press conferences because he can't handle unscripted
events ... last weeks debate was a case in point. He can barely make it
through scripted events without screwing it up.
He's a conservative who's created a record deficit. He's buried any
possibility of expansion of any social programs for years.
He lied or was severely misled by the Puppet Masters as to why Iraq needed
to be invaded. He won't apologize; he won't acknowledge that things *are*
bad there and not going according to plan and that something needs to be
done other then the 'same old same old'.
So why is this even a close race?
I pray to God that tonight John Kerry will hand The Coke Monkey his *****
again. And hopefully people *will* see the imbecile that's currenty trying
to send the planet to hell in a handbasket.
Article originating with the Associated
Press:
http://www.avonhistory.org/mil3/knew.htm
``Bremer Faulted Bush Before Terror
Attacks
WASHINGTON (AP) -- L. Paul Bremer,
the U.S. administrator in Iraq, said in a
speech six months before the Sept. 11
attacks that the Bush administration was
"paying no attention" to terrorism.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.771 / Virus Database: 518 - Release Date: 9/28/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
08 Oct 2004 01:01:11 PM |
|
|
X-cuzzzzzzzze me for top posting!
I completely agree with *everything* you said.
=====================================
Marvin wrote:
THAT's the scarey part. I find it completely out of sync with any form
of logic that anyone would even consider voitng for this moron.
He's had the fewest press conferences because he can't handle unscripted
events ... last weeks debate was a case in point. He can barely make it
through scripted events without screwing it up.
He's a conservative who's created a record deficit. He's buried any
possibility of expansion of any social programs for years.
He lied or was severely misled by the Puppet Masters as to why Iraq
needed to be invaded. He won't apologize; he won't acknowledge that
things *are* bad there and not going according to plan and that
something needs to be done other then the 'same old same old'.
So why is this even a close race?
I pray to God that tonight John Kerry will hand The Coke Monkey his *****
again. And hopefully people *will* see the imbecile that's currenty
trying to send the planet to hell in a handbasket.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
08 Oct 2004 01:52:52 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:01:11 -0400, (Su Zanadu)
wrote:
X-cuzzzzzzzze me for top posting!
I completely agree with *everything* you said.
=====================================
Marvin wrote:
THAT's the scarey part. I find it completely out of sync with any form
of logic that anyone would even consider voitng for this moron.
He's had the fewest press conferences because he can't handle unscripted
events ... last weeks debate was a case in point. He can barely make it
through scripted events without screwing it up.
He's a conservative who's created a record deficit. He's buried any
possibility of expansion of any social programs for years.
He lied or was severely misled by the Puppet Masters as to why Iraq
needed to be invaded. He won't apologize; he won't acknowledge that
things *are* bad there and not going according to plan and that
something needs to be done other then the 'same old same old'.
So why is this even a close race?
I pray to God that tonight John Kerry will hand The Coke Monkey his *****
again. And hopefully people *will* see the imbecile that's currenty
trying to send the planet to hell in a handbasket.
...even if (God forbid) Bush wins the election - at least I can say
I didn't help 'em. There's no way he's getting my vote. It may be
only one little vote from only one little ol' me...but I'll rest
better knowing that I had a say against him.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
08 Oct 2004 03:33:47 PM |
|
|
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:v1odm05urei61qunkmhoao3sou8v661bet@4ax.com...
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:01:11 -0400, (Su Zanadu)
wrote:
X-cuzzzzzzzze me for top posting!
I completely agree with *everything* you said.
=====================================
Marvin wrote:
THAT's the scarey part. I find it completely out of sync with any form
of logic that anyone would even consider voitng for this moron.
He's had the fewest press conferences because he can't handle unscripted
events ... last weeks debate was a case in point. He can barely make it
through scripted events without screwing it up.
He's a conservative who's created a record deficit. He's buried any
possibility of expansion of any social programs for years.
He lied or was severely misled by the Puppet Masters as to why Iraq
needed to be invaded. He won't apologize; he won't acknowledge that
things *are* bad there and not going according to plan and that
something needs to be done other then the 'same old same old'.
So why is this even a close race?
I pray to God that tonight John Kerry will hand The Coke Monkey his *****
again. And hopefully people *will* see the imbecile that's currenty
trying to send the planet to hell in a handbasket.
..even if (God forbid) Bush wins the election - at least I can say
I didn't help 'em. There's no way he's getting my vote. It may be
only one little vote from only one little ol' me...but I'll rest
better knowing that I had a say against him.
Dani
Every vote counts!!!!!
Never forget Florida 2000 ...
No more selections ...
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.771 / Virus Database: 518 - Release Date: 9/28/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
12 Oct 2004 02:02:16 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:33:47 -0400, "Marvin The Paranoid Android"
<marvin@galaxy.com> wrote:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:v1odm05urei61qunkmhoao3sou8v661bet@4ax.com...
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:01:11 -0400, (Su Zanadu)
wrote:
X-cuzzzzzzzze me for top posting!
I completely agree with *everything* you said.
=====================================
Marvin wrote:
THAT's the scarey part. I find it completely out of sync with any form
of logic that anyone would even consider voitng for this moron.
He's had the fewest press conferences because he can't handle unscripted
events ... last weeks debate was a case in point. He can barely make it
through scripted events without screwing it up.
He's a conservative who's created a record deficit. He's buried any
possibility of expansion of any social programs for years.
He lied or was severely misled by the Puppet Masters as to why Iraq
needed to be invaded. He won't apologize; he won't acknowledge that
things *are* bad there and not going according to plan and that
something needs to be done other then the 'same old same old'.
So why is this even a close race?
I pray to God that tonight John Kerry will hand The Coke Monkey his *****
again. And hopefully people *will* see the imbecile that's currenty
trying to send the planet to hell in a handbasket.
..even if (God forbid) Bush wins the election - at least I can say
I didn't help 'em. There's no way he's getting my vote. It may be
only one little vote from only one little ol' me...but I'll rest
better knowing that I had a say against him.
Dani
Every vote counts!!!!!
Never forget Florida 2000 ...
No more selections ...
No vote counted in 2000. The republican (GHWB's) US supreme court
voted him into office.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: " John F Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
10 Oct 2004 07:41:03 AM |
|
|
"Su Zanadu" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:5274-4165EED0-407@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net...
John wrote:
Sounds to me like we need some
focused, mature leadership in
Washington during this dangerous time.
He's *just* a redneck John.
We have Jethro Clampet living in OUR WHITE HOUSE!
This small error has been bugging me this week. Gotta be a stickler for the
truth.
Jethro's last name was actually Bodine. His mother, Pearl, was Jed's
cousin. Pearl ran the brothel, er I mean the hotel in Hooterville.
The masonic symbolism is rampant. Especially the thing with the train
constantly running.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
10 Oct 2004 11:53:56 AM |
|
|
John wrote:
SuZanne wrote:
He's *just* a redneck John.
We have Jethro Clampet living in OUR
WHITE HOUSE!
This small error has been bugging me
this week. Gotta be a stickler for the
truth.
Jethro's last name was actually Bodine.
OMG! That's right. How could I forget that? Thanks for the correction.
His mother, Pearl, was Jed's cousin.
Pearl ran the brothel, er I mean the
hotel in Hooterville.
The masonic symbolism is rampant.
Especially the thing with the train
constantly running.
SPOOKY! ;)
I always thought Jane at the bank was a lesbian....and I just found that
it is true on this site:
http://www.pcperspectives.com/hillbillies/kulp.html
.
|
|
|
| User: " John F Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
10 Oct 2004 01:35:44 PM |
|
|
"Su Zanadu" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:18351-41696924-87@storefull-3212.bay.webtv.net...
John wrote:
SuZanne wrote:
He's *just* a redneck John.
We have Jethro Clampet living in OUR
WHITE HOUSE!
This small error has been bugging me
this week. Gotta be a stickler for the
truth.
Jethro's last name was actually Bodine.
OMG! That's right. How could I forget that? Thanks for the correction.
His mother, Pearl, was Jed's cousin.
Pearl ran the brothel, er I mean the
hotel in Hooterville.
The masonic symbolism is rampant.
Especially the thing with the train
constantly running.
SPOOKY! ;)
I always thought Jane at the bank was a lesbian....and I just found that
it is true on this site:
http://www.pcperspectives.com/hillbillies/kulp.html
See and the next thing you know Chastity Bono has her own cable show. :-)
It's all part of the plan. Subtle, hidden things
then............................ BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: " John F Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
08 Oct 2004 06:58:12 AM |
|
|
"Su Zanadu" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:5274-4165EED0-407@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net...
John wrote:
Sounds to me like we need some
focused, mature leadership in
Washington during this dangerous time.
He's *just* a redneck John.
"Just" a common little hilljack oil man with extensive family CIA
connections. :-)
We have Jethro Clampet living in OUR WHITE HOUSE!
With Mr. Drysdale pulling the strings.
And he wants to renew the lease for 4 more years.....THAT SCARES ME!
And a good half of my friends, family and neighbors are staunch
supporters of him. It is so creepy! It is like they are brainwashed or
under some sort of spell.
I think it's early yet, darlin'. I was listening to his response to the
Iraq Survey Group's report yesterday. His spin is becoming old and labored,
goofy even. I think the more revelations come out and the more he runs on
and on with this type of bs the more people will see thru the fascade.
If Kerry applies enough pressure to this point I think you'll see Georgie
publicly implode. Maybe even do a John Dean type of thing. You could even
see it during the debate tonite.
Kerry could build a lot of momentum in the next 3 - 4 weeks.
Don't they listen to what is going on or do they hear only what they
want to hear? I don't understand it.
Life can be easier and even more passionate and fulfilling if you don't
think and just take your place at the rear of the sled team. Life is much
less certain when you question authority.
It's going to be a close one.
Sok, as long as you get the right result. :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
08 Oct 2004 01:17:04 PM |
|
|
John wrote:
I think it's early yet, darlin'. I was
listening to his response to the Iraq
Survey Group's report yesterday. His
spin is becoming old and labored, goofy
even. I think the more revelations come
out and the more he runs on and on with
this type of bs the more people will see
thru the fascade.
They need to snap out of it. (the spell)
If Kerry applies enough pressure to this
point I think you'll see Georgie publicly
implode. Maybe even do a John Dean
type of thing. You could even see it
during the debate tonite.
We wanna see the REAL GWB! You can't fool me with those lame "I choked
on my pretzel and passed out in my bowl of dip" excuses for the shiners.
;)
He and Jeb got to rolling on the floor after innocent arm wrestling got
out of hand......is what I think really happened. ;)
If somebody told me 10 years ago I'd be sitting home on a Friday night
watching a presidential debate..........I'd probably still be laughing!
:)
Kerry could build a lot of momentum in
the next 3 - 4 weeks.
Anything I can do to help? NASCAR fans could pose a problem. I'll try my
best to sway them.....this town is crawling with them!
Don't they listen to what is going on or
do they hear only what they want to
hear? I don't understand it.
Life can be easier and even more
passionate and fulfilling if you don't
think and just take your place at the rear
of the sled team. Life is much less
certain when you question authority.
You have a way with your words there John!
It's going to be a close one.
Sok, as long as you get the right result.
:-)
Sawright! ;)
SuZanne
.
|
|
|
| User: " John F Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
10 Oct 2004 08:24:18 AM |
|
|
"Su Zanadu" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:20499-4166D9A0-572@storefull-3213.bay.webtv.net...
We wanna see the REAL GWB! You can't fool me with those lame "I choked
on my pretzel and passed out in my bowl of dip" excuses for the shiners.
;)
He and Jeb got to rolling on the floor after innocent arm wrestling got
out of hand......is what I think really happened. ;)
Probably. Easy to accept once you understand that Jethro went to Beverly
Hills to be with Ellie May.
If somebody told me 10 years ago I'd be sitting home on a Friday night
watching a presidential debate..........I'd probably still be laughing!
:)
Good for you. Really. I can't stand the sight of GWB or the sound of his
voice anymore.
Kerry could build a lot of momentum in
the next 3 - 4 weeks.
Anything I can do to help? NASCAR fans could pose a problem. I'll try my
best to sway them.....this town is crawling with them!
We have to find a way to say it the way Dale, Jr. would say it. :-)
Don't they listen to what is going on or
do they hear only what they want to
hear? I don't understand it.
Life can be easier and even more
passionate and fulfilling if you don't
think and just take your place at the rear
of the sled team. Life is much less
certain when you question authority.
You have a way with your words there John!
Yeah, I confuse people all the time. :-)
It's going to be a close one.
Sok, as long as you get the right result.
:-)
Sawright! ;)
Samen!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
08 Oct 2004 09:46:07 AM |
|
|
John F Lemke a écrit:
"Su Zanadu" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:5274-4165EED0-407@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net...
John wrote:
Sounds to me like we need some
focused, mature leadership in
Washington during this dangerous time.
He's *just* a redneck John.
"Just" a common little hilljack oil man with extensive family CIA
connections. :-)
We have Jethro Clampet living in OUR WHITE HOUSE!
With Mr. Drysdale pulling the strings.
And he wants to renew the lease for 4 more years.....THAT SCARES ME!
And a good half of my friends, family and neighbors are staunch
supporters of him. It is so creepy! It is like they are brainwashed or
under some sort of spell.
I think it's early yet, darlin'. I was listening to his response to the
Iraq Survey Group's report yesterday. His spin is becoming old and labored,
goofy even. I think the more revelations come out and the more he runs on
and on with this type of bs the more people will see thru the fascade.
If Kerry applies enough pressure to this point I think you'll see Georgie
publicly implode. Maybe even do a John Dean type of thing. You could even
see it during the debate tonite.
Kerry could build a lot of momentum in the next 3 - 4 weeks.
Bah, the Iraqi survey group provided proof that Saddam had to be
removed. Inspections would have never worked. kay said so last night No
matter how you weasels try to spin the truth, if the US hadn't
implemented the UN resolution, there would be WMD in the hands of
terrorists.. The article goes further BTW showing there could still be
attempt by AlQaeda to get their hand on them,. as the latest beheading
to get Dr. Germ showed BTW.
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0410/07/asb.01.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BROWN: Let me ask you to just venture a little bit into conjecture, but
it's in your area of expertise. Do you believe, sir, that if the
inspectors had been given more time before the run up to the war, they
or during the run up to the war, they could have determined, considering
the conditions they were working under which weren't optimal, I suppose,
whether there were weapons or not?
KAY: Aaron, I think under the conditions that Saddam imposed, the
inspections would have not had a definitive outcome. Remember, Hans Blix
in December of -- right before the war reported Iraq had not made a
clear determination to disarm. Iraq still was standing in the way of
inspections right up to the time of the war. Inspections could have
continued for another six months. I'm afraid we would still lack a
definitive conclusion as to what the status of Saddam's weapons program
was. We certainly wouldn't understand it as we do today.
As you see, the inspections would have had no effect. FURTHERMORE:
BROWN: And the point of that to me just seems to be that while hindsight
is terrific and it is, we all enjoy it, even the inspectors themselves
or the inspection process itself might not have led us to this
conclusion prior to the war. There were, I know in your mind, there were
concerns about the scientists and what the scientists might do, given
the conditions in Iraq that existed?
KAY: Absolutely. I said in January when I testified, I thought Iraq in
some ways was far more dangerous than the intelligence community had
assessed. That is, the corruption, the decay of the society itself was
leading scientists to be willing to do almost anything to support their
family. In a world where you've got a willing seller, you usually find a
willing buyer, in this case it would have been terrorism and our
intelligence was not good enough to pick up an individual scientist
selling to a terrorist network. Look at AQ Khan. For 18 years we missed
him selling to Iran and North Korea. It was only when he picked a very
bad customer, Libya, that we managed to roll that network up.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyway, I don't see how kerry's weasels can get away with their leis and
convince so many people. Are there so many ignorant Americans?
J.
Don't they listen to what is going on or do they hear only what they
want to hear? I don't understand it.
Life can be easier and even more passionate and fulfilling if you don't
think and just take your place at the rear of the sled team. Life is much
less certain when you question authority.
It's going to be a close one.
Sok, as long as you get the right result. :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
08 Oct 2004 12:41:39 PM |
|
|
Jean wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0410/07/asb.01.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
08 Oct 2004 02:15:55 PM |
|
|
Su Zanadu a écrit:
Jean wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0410/07/asb.01.html
Right:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BROWN: Let me ask you to just venture a little bit into conjecture, but
it's in your area of expertise. Do you believe, sir, that if the
inspectors had been given more time before the run up to the war, they
or during the run up to the war, they could have determined, considering
the conditions they were working under which weren't optimal, I suppose,
whether there were weapons or not?
KAY: Aaron, I think under the conditions that Saddam imposed, the
inspections would have not had a definitive outcome. Remember, Hans Blix
in December of -- right before the war reported Iraq had not made a
clear determination to disarm. Iraq still was standing in the way of
inspections right up to the time of the war. Inspections could have
continued for another six months. I'm afraid we would still lack a
definitive conclusion as to what the status of Saddam's weapons program
was. We certainly wouldn't understand it as we do today.
As you see, the inspections would have had no effect. FURTHERMORE:
BROWN: And the point of that to me just seems to be that while hindsight
is terrific and it is, we all enjoy it, even the inspectors themselves
or the inspection process itself might not have led us to this
conclusion prior to the war. There were, I know in your mind, there were
concerns about the scientists and what the scientists might do, given
the conditions in Iraq that existed?
KAY: Absolutely. I said in January when I testified, I thought Iraq in
some ways was far more dangerous than the intelligence community had
assessed. That is, the corruption, the decay of the society itself was
leading scientists to be willing to do almost anything to support their
family. In a world where you've got a willing seller, you usually find a
willing buyer, in this case it would have been terrorism and our
intelligence was not good enough to pick up an individual scientist
selling to a terrorist network. Look at AQ Khan. For 18 years we missed
him selling to Iran and North Korea. It was only when he picked a very
bad customer, Libya, that we managed to roll that network up.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
J.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
08 Oct 2004 12:53:40 PM |
|
|
Jean wrote:
(Add this to the one that got away from me)
Anyway, I don't see how kerry's weasels
can get away with their leis and
convince so many people.
I think "leis" are pretty and smell so nice!
They make them from Frangiapani flowers.
Are there so many ignorant Americans?
Are you going to complete this sentence or should I just *guess* what
you are trying to convey here?
SuZanne
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
08 Oct 2004 02:19:49 PM |
|
|
Su Zanadu a écrit:
Jean wrote:
(Add this to the one that got away from me)
Anyway, I don't see how kerry's weasels
can get away with their leis and
convince so many people.
I think "leis" are pretty and smell so nice!
Bah, a typo that got away. Lies are lies. Weasels are weasels. If you
all you can do is stumble on one single typo you don't have much to
counter with.
They make them from Frangiapani flowers.
Are there so many ignorant Americans?
Are you going to complete this sentence or should I just *guess* what
you are trying to convey here?
SuZanne
Worded otherwise? How many believe the Dems lies that Bush lied when
they can't substantiate one single lie?
Hence why I ask: How many people are that ignorant in America?
J.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
12 Oct 2004 02:04:17 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:46:07 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
John F Lemke a écrit:
"Su Zanadu" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:5274-4165EED0-407@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net...
John wrote:
Sounds to me like we need some
focused, mature leadership in
Washington during this dangerous time.
He's *just* a redneck John.
"Just" a common little hilljack oil man with extensive family CIA
connections. :-)
We have Jethro Clampet living in OUR WHITE HOUSE!
With Mr. Drysdale pulling the strings.
And he wants to renew the lease for 4 more years.....THAT SCARES ME!
And a good half of my friends, family and neighbors are staunch
supporters of him. It is so creepy! It is like they are brainwashed or
under some sort of spell.
I think it's early yet, darlin'. I was listening to his response to the
Iraq Survey Group's report yesterday. His spin is becoming old and labored,
goofy even. I think the more revelations come out and the more he runs on
and on with this type of bs the more people will see thru the fascade.
If Kerry applies enough pressure to this point I think you'll see Georgie
publicly implode. Maybe even do a John Dean type of thing. You could even
see it during the debate tonite.
Kerry could build a lot of momentum in the next 3 - 4 weeks.
Bah, the Iraqi survey group provided proof that Saddam had to be
[...]
Bah bah black sheep...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "eric davis" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
07 Oct 2004 03:42:45 PM |
|
|
I thought Cheney said to go to "Fatchicks.com"...hmmm....those girls are
purty.
eric.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
07 Oct 2004 07:41:51 PM |
|
|
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<_ef9d.25539$jj2.1182549@news20.bellglobal.com>...
I thought Cheney said to go to "Fatchicks.com"...hmmm....those girls are
purty.
No, he said that is where John Edwards went to pick out a wife. ;)
eric.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
07 Oct 2004 08:09:50 PM |
|
|
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0410071641.6817d824@posting.google.com...
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<_ef9d.25539$jj2.1182549@news20.bellglobal.com>...
I thought Cheney said to go to "Fatchicks.com"...hmmm....those girls are
purty.
No, he said that is where John Edwards went to pick out a wife. ;)
So what was your picture doing there???
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.771 / Virus Database: 518 - Release Date: 9/28/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
07 Oct 2004 10:08:48 PM |
|
|
Google has both side of the story, if you two wallowers may imagine that
your lies will be taken for cash. LOL
Wallow in your fartitude, losers.
J.
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0410071641.6817d824@posting.google.com...
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<_ef9d.25539$jj2.1182549@news20.bellglobal.com>...
I thought Cheney said to go to "Fatchicks.com"...hmmm....those girls are
purty.
No, he said that is where John Edwards went to pick out a wife. ;)
So what was your picture doing there???
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.771 / Virus Database: 518 - Release Date: 9/28/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
08 Oct 2004 05:41:28 AM |
|
|
What? You and MJM not butt-buddies anymore??
LOL ..
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:4xn9d.43442$N%.21998@edtnps84...
Google has both side of the story, if you two wallowers may imagine that
your lies will be taken for cash. LOL
Wallow in your fartitude, losers.
J.
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0410071641.6817d824@posting.google.com...
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<_ef9d.25539$jj2.1182549@news20.bellglobal.com>...
I thought Cheney said to go to "Fatchicks.com"...hmmm....those girls
are
purty.
No, he said that is where John Edwards went to pick out a wife. ;)
So what was your picture doing there???
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.771 / Virus Database: 518 - Release Date: 9/28/04
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.771 / Virus Database: 518 - Release Date: 9/28/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: With Running Mates Like Cheney.... ;) |
08 Oct 2004 12:33:56 PM |
|
|
I am talking to you and eric, loser.
Gee you are 'tard.
J.
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
What? You and MJM not butt-buddies anymore??
LOL ..
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:4xn9d.43442$N%.21998@edtnps84...
Google has both side of the story, if you two wallowers may imagine that
your lies will be taken for cash. LOL
Wallow in your fartitude, losers.
J.
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0410071641.6817d824@posting.google.com...
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<_ef9d.25539$jj2.1182549@news20.bellglobal.com>...
I thought Cheney said to go to "Fatchicks.com"...hmmm....those girls
are
purty.
No, he said that is where John Edwards went to pick out a wife. ;)
So what was your picture doing there???
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.771 / Virus Database: 518 - Release Date: 9/28/04
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.771 / Virus Database: 518 - Release Date: 9/28/04
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
