| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"Simpson Medical Group" |
| Date: |
13 May 2007 07:35:14 AM |
| Object: |
Woman Posing as a Boy Pleads Guility to Molesting Girl |
Friday May 11, 2007
Woman posing as boy pleads guilty to molesting girl
by The Associated Press
EVERETT, Wash. -- A woman who posed as a homeless orphaned boy, befriended
a teenage girl and was taken into her family's home has pleaded guilty to
child molestation.
Prosecutors said they will seek the maximum one-year jail term for Lorelei
J. Corpuz, 30, who entered her plea Wednesday. Charges of third-degree
child rape were dropped last month.
Authorities said Corpuz, who cropped her hair and stands 5-foot-3, passed
herself off as 17-year-old Mark Villanueva after meeting the girl at a
mall in September 2005. Her parents, immigrants who speak little English,
later let Corpuz live at their home.
The deception became known after a traffic stop led to Corpuz's arrest on
an unrelated warrant. The girl was in the car and told police that Corpuz
was her boyfriend, according to documents filed in court.
Although Corpuz had sexual contact with the girl, "the suspect never let
victim see her/his private parts and victim always thought that suspect
was male until officer informed her otherwise,'' Police Officer Don de
Nevens wrote.
Sentencing is set for June 18.
http://www.dailymail.com/story/Nation+and+World/2007051114/Woman-posing-as-boy-pleads-guilty-to-molesting-girl/
.
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Woman Posing as a Boy Pleads Guility to Molesting Girl |
13 May 2007 09:45:28 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 13 May 2007 05:35:14 -0700, "Simpson Medical Group"
<simpsonmedgroup@homerhospital.com> wrote:
Although Corpuz had sexual contact with the girl, "the suspect never let
victim see her/his private parts and victim always thought that suspect
was male until officer informed her otherwise,''
Doc.. forgive me here, but how could that woman possibly have hidden
the fact that she didn't have a penis? I don't get how she did that.
It says above that she had "sexual contact" with the girl...but uh,
how did she make love to her without the proper equipment?
It says that the suspect never "let the victim see her/his private
parts" - but that still doesn't explain how the two of them had sex.
They couldn't have even had oral sex without the girl knowing she
didn't have a penis. Unless the woman gave the girl oral sex, without
having gotten it back in return - and *that* is what they are
referring to when they say "Corpuz had sexual contact" with the girl?
Am I missing something here? Or do you also not understand how she
was able to have "sexual contact" without the girl not figuring out
that she was indeed a she, and not a he?
Cheers,
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Woman Posing as a Boy Pleads Guility to Molesting Girl |
14 May 2007 07:10:02 PM |
|
|
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e8jf43ddjusug7275hqmtfdhfm8akrb90n@4ax.com...
On Sun, 13 May 2007 05:35:14 -0700, "Simpson Medical Group"
<simpsonmedgroup@homerhospital.com> wrote:
Although Corpuz had sexual contact with the girl, "the suspect never let
victim see her/his private parts and victim always thought that suspect
was male until officer informed her otherwise,''
Doc.. forgive me here, but how could that woman possibly have hidden
the fact that she didn't have a penis? I don't get how she did that.
It says above that she had "sexual contact" with the girl...but uh,
how did she make love to her without the proper equipment?
It says that the suspect never "let the victim see her/his private
parts" - but that still doesn't explain how the two of them had sex.
They couldn't have even had oral sex without the girl knowing she
didn't have a penis. Unless the woman gave the girl oral sex, without
having gotten it back in return - and *that* is what they are
referring to when they say "Corpuz had sexual contact" with the girl?
Am I missing something here? Or do you also not understand how she
was able to have "sexual contact" without the girl not figuring out
that she was indeed a she, and not a he?
Cheers,
Dani
Uh....um...uh...perhaps it was always very dark when she had sexual
contact with her?
And, she kept her victim's hands and mouth busy above the *triangle* so
that she'd not notice that she didn't have a penis (and testicles)?
If she was rather dominant, and devious, both scenarios would prevent her
from knowing "she" was a male.
This incident sounds like a bull ***** gone pretty much overboard,
psychologically. The girl was apparently bi or gay, or possibly confused
(well, I assume that based on the scant info).
It may be that the victim was quite naive about sex generally, and that
would make for a good opportunity for the poser to do whatever she wanted,
and in the way she wanted. It is also possible, Dani, that the victim lied
about not knowing the boy was a girl...perhaps to avoid her shame about
being bi or gay?? Or, to avoid embarassment she is sexually, socially
naive? (Or both?)
I agree with Woods that this poser gal is in need of much interpersonal
and self-identity therapy...hopefully, though, not like some of the kind I
received! LOL! She could get even worse! Sheeesh....
Doc ;)~
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Woman Posing as a Boy Pleads Guility to Molesting Girl |
13 May 2007 10:21:43 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 13 May 2007 22:45:28 -0400, Dani wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2007 05:35:14 -0700, "Simpson Medical Group"
<simpsonmedgroup@homerhospital.com> wrote:
Although Corpuz had sexual contact with the girl, "the suspect never let
victim see her/his private parts and victim always thought that suspect
was male until officer informed her otherwise,''
Doc.. forgive me here, but how could that woman possibly have hidden
the fact that she didn't have a penis? I don't get how she did that.
It says above that she had "sexual contact" with the girl...but uh,
how did she make love to her without the proper equipment?
It says that the suspect never "let the victim see her/his private
parts" - but that still doesn't explain how the two of them had sex.
They couldn't have even had oral sex without the girl knowing she
didn't have a penis. Unless the woman gave the girl oral sex, without
having gotten it back in return - and *that* is what they are
referring to when they say "Corpuz had sexual contact" with the girl?
Am I missing something here? Or do you also not understand how she
was able to have "sexual contact" without the girl not figuring out
that she was indeed a she, and not a he?
Cheers,
Dani
"Sexual contact" doesn't necessarily mean, um, standard sexual
intercourse.
I think there's a teenage girl that's going to need some heavy-duty
counseling. If finding out her 'boyfriend' wasn't enough, having
everyone her school/town know it sure will be. Poor kid!
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
