World War III NEWS, Monday, April 3rd, 2006 AD.....


 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > World War III NEWS, Monday, April 3rd, 2006 AD.....

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1
 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "=?utf-8?B?VGhlIExhc3QgMjQ1MiBkYXlz4oSiIOKZpQ==?="
Date: 02 Apr 2006 11:18:09 PM
Object: World War III NEWS, Monday, April 3rd, 2006 AD.....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/04/02/wiran02.xml
Government in secret talks about strike against Iran
By Sean Rayment, Defence Correspondent
(Filed: 02/04/2006)
The Government is to hold secret talks with defence chiefs tomorrow
(April 3rd, 2006 !!! ) to discuss possible military strikes against
Iran.
A high-level meeting will take place in the Ministry of Defence at
which senior defence chiefs and government officials will consider the
consequences of an attack on Iran.
It is believed that an American-led attack, designed to destroy Iran's
ability to develop a nuclear bomb, is "inevitable" if Teheran's leaders
fail to comply with United Nations demands to freeze their uranium
enrichment programme.
A high-level meeting will take place in the Ministry of Defence
Tomorrow's meeting will be attended by Gen Sir Michael Walker, the
chief of the defence staff, Lt Gen Andrew Ridgway, the chief of defence
intelligence and Maj Gen Bill Rollo, the assistant chief of the general
staff, together with officials from the Foreign Office and Downing
Street.
The International Atomic Energy Authority, the nuclear watchdog,
believes that much of Iran's programme is now devoted to uranium
enrichment and plutonium separation, technologies that could provide
material for nuclear bombs to be developed in the next three years.
The United States government is hopeful that the military operation
will be a multinational mission, but defence chiefs believe that the
Bush administration is prepared to launch the attack on its own or with
the assistance of Israel, if there is little international support.
British military chiefs believe an attack would be limited to a series
of air strikes against nuclear plants - a land assault is not being
considered at the moment.
But confirmation that Britain has started contingency planning will
undermine the claim last month by Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary,
that a military attack against Iran was "inconceivable".
Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, insisted, during a visit
to Blackburn yesterday, that all negotiating options - including the
use of force - remained open in an attempt to resolve the crisis.
General Sir Michael Walker
Tactical Tomahawk cruise missiles fired from US navy ships and
submarines in the Gulf would, it is believed, target Iran's air defence
systems at the nuclear installations.
That would enable attacks by B2 stealth bombers equipped with eight
4,500lb enhanced BLU-28 satellite-guided bunker-busting bombs, flying
from Diego Garcia, the isolated US Navy base in the Indian Ocean, RAF
Fairford in Gloucestershire and Whiteman USAF base in Missouri.
It is understood that any direct British involvement in an attack would
be limited but may extend to the use of the RAF's highly secret
airborne early warning aircraft.
At the centre of the crisis is Washington's fear that an Iranian
nuclear weapon could be used against Israel or US forces in the region,
such as the American air base at Incirlik in Turkey.
The UN also believes that the production of a bomb could also lead to
further destabilisation in the Middle East, which would result in
Egypt, Syria and Saudi Arabia all developing nuclear weapons
programmes.
Click to enlarge
A senior Foreign Office source said: "Monday's meeting will set out to
address the consequences for Britain in the event of an attack against
Iran. The CDS [chiefs of defence staff] will want to know what the
impact will be on British interests in Iraq and Afghanistan which both
border Iran. The CDS will then brief the Prime Minister and the Cabinet
on their conclusions in the next few days.
"If Iran makes another strategic mistake, such as ignoring demands by
the UN or future resolutions, then the thinking among the chiefs is
that military action could be taken to bring an end to the crisis. The
belief in some areas of Whitehall is that an attack is now all but
inevitable.
There will be no invasion of Iran but the nuclear sites will be
destroyed. This is not something that will happen imminently, maybe
this year, maybe next year. Jack Straw is making exactly the same
noises that the Government did in March 2003 when it spoke about the
likelihood of a war in Iraq.
"Then the Government said the war was neither inevitable or imminent
and then attacked."
The source said that the Israeli attack against Iraq's Osirak nuclear
reactor in 1981 proved that a limited operation was the best military
option.
The Israeli air force launched raids against the plant, which
intelligence suggested was being used to develop a nuclear bomb for use
against Israel.
Military chiefs also plan tomorrow to discuss fears that an attack
within Iran will "unhinge" southern Iraq - where British troops are
based - an area mainly populated by Shia Muslims who have strong
political and religious links to Iran.
They are concerned that this could delay any withdrawal of troops this
year or next. There could also be consequences for British and US
troops in Afghanistan, which borders Iran.
The MoD meeting will address the economic issues that could arise if
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president - who became the subject of
international condemnation last year when he called for Israel to be
"wiped off the map" - cuts off oil supplies to the West in reprisal.
There are thought to be at least eight known sites within Iran involved
in the production of nuclear materials, although it is generally
accepted that there are many more secret installations.
Iran has successfully tested a Fajr-3 missile that can reach Israel,
avoiding radar and hitting several targets using multiple warheads, its
military has confirmed.
---0---
.

User: "Nobody"

Title: Re: World War III NEWS, Monday, April 3rd, 2006 AD..... 03 Apr 2006 07:46:30 PM
Gen. Walker ROCKZ dude. When all the oil supplies
on Earth are radioactive to such a degree of intensity
that it glows when sloshed about -- then we will all
have to go hydrogen to power everything.
I heard them mention also that McDonalds is working out a
deal with Iran to have 10 fast food outlets in all the cities.
.
User: "=?utf-8?B?VGhlIExhc3QgMjQ1MSBkYXlz4oSiIOKZpQ==?="

Title: Re: World War III NEWS, Monday, April 3rd, 2006 AD..... 03 Apr 2006 10:11:35 PM
Welcome back, Little Buddy !!!! ;-) ;-)
HOOROO
UNCLE WALLY
---0---
.
User: "=?iso-8859-1?B?07/SIEh1bnRlciB0aGUgZ3J1bnRlciDTv9I=?="

Title: Re: World War III NEWS, Monday, April 3rd, 2006 AD..... 09 Apr 2006 02:39:39 AM
I built a time machine and went to the very ending of WWIII.
Guess who won? Norway won of course.
.
User: "=?utf-8?B?VGhlIExhc3QgMjQ0NSBEYXlz4oSiIOKZpQ==?="

Title: Re: World War III NEWS, Monday, April 3rd, 2006 AD..... 09 Apr 2006 09:57:44 PM
I'm sure glad Norway won, Little Buddy !!!
I love the cold, frigid weather !!!
HOOROO
UNCLE WALLY
---0---
.





  Page 1 of 1

1
 


Related Articles
 

NEWER
pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER