| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"=?utf-8?B?4pi6IC7CtzoqwqjCqCo6wrcuwrc6KsKowqgqOsK3LiAg4pmlIFdvcmxkIFdhciBJSUkgMjAwNywgVGhlIExhc3QgMjAwMCBEYXlzLi4uSE9PUk9PICEgIC7CtzoqwqjCqCo6wrcuIOKZpeKYusKpwq7ihKI=?=" |
| Date: |
26 Feb 2007 07:52:44 PM |
| Object: |
World War III ***NEWZ*** Tuesday, Feb. 27, 2007 |
http://www.kommersant.com/p745646/Iran_nuclear_crisis/
Tuesday, Feb. 27, 2007
Iran Braces for War
The US Stockpiles Bombs and Allies
Representatives of the five permanent members of the United Nations
Security Council, plus Germany, met in London yesterday to discuss
means of resolving the Iranian nuclear crisis. Now that Iran has yet
again refused to stop enriching uranium, the Group of Six discussed
the possibility of introducing harsher international sanctions. If
pressure on Tehran does not yield results, the Bush administration
does not rule out the possibility of military strikes against Iran.
Preparations for that eventuality are apparently already going ahead
full throttle.
"The Train of the Iranian Nation Has No Brakes"
The consultation in the British capital between deputy foreign
ministers from the six world powers that are trying to stop an
escalation of the Iranian nuclear crisis took place behind closed
doors. The format of the London meeting did not offer the assembled
representatives of the US, Great Britain, France, Germany, China, and
Russia (Russia's representative was Sergei Kislyak) the opportunity to
adopt any final resolutions. It was reported on the eve of the meeting
that the diplomats would be discussing a raft of new, harsher
sanctions against Iran before dispersing to their home countries to
meet with their leaders and to report on the positions of the other
members of the Group of Six regarding possible goads for Tehran after
Iran snubbed the carrot proffered by the international community.
February 21 was the expiration date of the two-month UN ultimatum
delivered to Tehran by the UN Security Council last December in the
form of resolution #1737, which called on Tehran to stop enriching
uranium. Given that the sanctions included in the resolution have had
no effect at all on the position of the Iranian side, the Group of Six
is faced with the question of what additional levers can be employed
to bring sufficient pressure to bear on Tehran.
That the members of the Group of Six so far have no ready answers to
the question of how to make Tehran return to the negotiating table was
confirmed by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. On the eve of the
London talks, Mr. Lavrov told Russian President Vladimir Putin that
"the Iranian leadership so far is not giving satisfactory answers to
the IAEA's questions" and that the participants in the consultation in
the British capital were facing "a difficult task."
Yesterday a senior British diplomat, speaking on condition of
anonymity, said that the Group of Six would consider cutting off $20
million in European trade credits to Iran. The sanctions under
consideration also include an embargo on the delivery of arms to Iran
and a ban on international travel for Iranians with ties to the
nuclear program.
While Russia and China still do not consider sanctions to be the
optimal solution and are busy playing the good cop in the
negotiations, Washington is pushing its partners in the Security
Council towards the harshest possible resolution on Iran. According to
a Kommersant source in Washington, during Condoleezza Rice's recent
visit to Berlin, the US secretary of state attempted to convince the
other members of the Quartet of Middle East negotiators (Russia, the
UN, and the EU) of the necessity of taking decisive steps. "The point
of Security Council action has always been to try to get to a
negotiating track. The idea is not that somehow the sanctions will=E2=80=A6
produce the desired result. We would like to do that in negotiations,
so the hope is that the sanctions show the Iranians=E2=80=A6that [their]
isolation is likely to increase over time, and that it's time to take
a different course," she said last week at a press conference in
Berlin.
As if in response to the US secretary of state, on Sunday Iranian
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad confirmed Tehran's readiness to pursue
its own course independently of whatever actions may be taken against
Iran. "The train of the Iranian nation has no brakes or reverse gear.
We took off the brakes and the reverse gear and tossed them aside a
long time ago," said President Ahmadinejad in his characteristic
provocative manner at a meeting with Islamic clerics in Tehran.
The tirade from the president about the "Iranian train with no brakes"
made a strong impression in Washington. In an interview on Fox News
Sunday, Condoleezza Rice replied immediately, saying, "they don=E2=80=99t n=
eed
a reverse gear. They need to stop and then we can come to the table
and we can talk about how to move forward." She added that she is
"prepared to meet [her] counterpart or an Iranian representative at
any time if Iran will suspend its enrichment and reprocessing
activities."
The statement from Condoleezza Rice had no impact whatsoever on the
Iranian side, which yesterday maintained that suspension of uranium
enrichment cannot serve as a condition for holding negotiations.
"Setting conditions means indicating the outcome of talks prior to
holding them. Therefore, such a policy is unacceptable," said Ali
Larijani, the secretary of Iran's National Security Council. However,
he did add that Tehran welcomes "fair negotiations." The necessary
conditions remain anyone's guess.
The Road to War
Opinion in Washington remains divided over what measures should be
taken against Iran if international pressure on Tehran continues to be
ineffective. At his meeting yesterday with President Putin, Foreign
Minister Lavrov maintained that a US military strike against Iran
without the approval of the United Nations is not just a hypothetical
scenario. Expressing "unease over indications that a strike may be
launched against Iran," Mr. Lavrov referenced recent remarks by US
Vice-President ***** Cheney, in which Mr. Cheney mentioned the
possibility of an attack on Iran.
Meanwhile, according to Kommersant sources close to the White House,
the Bush administration is divided between two possible approaches.
While Secretary of State Rice continues to insist on diplomacy, Vice-
President Cheney believes that diplomatic attempts to convince Iran
are futile and that the matter will end in a military showdown that
needs to be planned for immediately.
President Bush himself has so far declined to participate in the
fracas in his administration. On the one hand, the president has given
Secretary Rice time to attempt to resolve the crisis by diplomatic
means, but on the other hand, he has not applied the brakes to
preparations for possible air strikes targeting Iranian nuclear
facilities. According to Kommersant's sources, Mr. Bush's hand is
being guided by the Pentagon, which has requested at least seven to
nine months to prepare for military strikes. The development of the
plan of attack against Iran's nuclear facilities has reportedly been
entrusted to deputy defense secretary Gordon England, who will work
closely with US intelligence services and several countries in the
Middle East. Assistant secretary of state Nicholas Burns has been
charged with attempting to forge an American-European diplomatic
alliance that will convince Russia and China to vote in the Security
Council in favor of harsh sanctions against Iran. Mr. Burns will also
need to secure the consent of the EU for a possible military strike
against Iran and to receive a guarantee of technical support, such as
fuelling stops and flyover rights for American bombers, from America's
allies in the Middle East, which include Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt,
and Turkey.
In the opinion of Kommersant's sources, at the end of the seven to
nine months of preparations, the American Air Force will be outfitted
with new "long-range penetration" bombs that will be significantly
more powerful that those that were used in Iraq in 2003. In the
invasion of Iraq, the US dropped more than two tons of bombs on each
Iraqi military or intelligence target.
The Quiet American in Iran
Stories appearing in the American media testify that victory in the
standoff with Iran has become one of the Bush administration's top
international priorities. In the administration's ongoing struggle
with the Iranian regime, however, sanctions and air strikes are not
the only weapons being employed. The magazine The New Yorker has
reported that the US is also undertaking secret intelligence
operations on Iranian territory. In the article, the well-known
journalist Seymour Hirsch claims that the operations are being carried
out by special operations teams from the US military that have
infiltrated Iran from neighboring Iraq with the goal of collecting
intelligence data and "pursuing Iranian operatives from Iraq."
According to Mr. Hirsch, the hand behind this strategy is none other
than Vice-President Cheney, whose policies "have brought the United
States closer to a open confrontation with Iran." There are
increasingly few people either in Washington or in Tehran who would
disagree.
Dmitry Sidorov (Washington) and Sergey Strokan
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Other upcoming World War III events:
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3369712,00.html
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=3D1171894516383&pagename=3DJPost=
/JPArticle/ShowFull
HOOROO
UNCLE WALLY
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
WORLD WAR III NEWS, Tuesday, April 4th, 2006 AD.............
World War III **NEWS** Tuesday, July 22, 2003
World War III **NEWS** Tuesday, September 30, 2003..Iran warns Israel against strike on nuclear sites
World War III **NEWS** Tuesday, July 22, 2003............+
World War III **NEWS** Tuesday, November 9th, 2004 AD..........
World War III NEWS, Tuesday, April 11th, 2006 AD....Bush's "Nuclear Option"
World War III **NEWS** Tuesday, July 1, 2003 -- SARS death toll continues to mount.......
World War III **NEWS** Tuesday, June 24, 2003 AD
| World War III ***NEWS*** Tuesday, August 19, 2003.... +
World War III Diary....Tuesday 16/5/6
World War III News, Tuesday, April 18th, 2006 AD....Global Storm Warning...
World War III **NEWS** Tuesday, June 24, 2003.....Qatar man declared 'enemy combatant....
World War III **NEWS** Tuesday, July 1, 2003........
World War III ***NEWS*** Tuesday, July 29, 2003...............
World War III ***NEWS*** Tuesday, August 5, 2003....+
|
|
|
