| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"yipee yahoo" |
| Date: |
30 Jan 2004 09:49:56 PM |
| Object: |
WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
from www.endtime.com
====================
Pakistan Warns U.S. About Crossing Border
January 30, 2004, 4:12 PM EST
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- A hard-line Islamic coalition warned Friday
that Pakistani tribesmen might open fire on American troops if the
United States extends a planned spring offensive against Afghan rebels
into Pakistan.
Such a move would be a "historic mistake," said Riaz Durrani,
spokesman for the opposition coalition Mutahida Majlis-e-Amal, which
controls two Pakistani provinces bordering Afghanistan.
A U.S. official in Washington hinted this week that a planned effort
to step up the hunt for Taliban or al-Qaida fugitives at the end of
winter could go into Pakistan. For the past two years, thousands of
U.S. forces have been operating in southern and eastern Afghanistan
but say they haven't crossed the frontier.
The tribal areas are rugged, remote and historically autonomous areas
that were never really brought under the control of Pakistan's central
government. People there are linked by language and culture to Afghan
Pashtuns, the ethnic group that was the Taliban's power base.
Pakistan is a key U.S. ally in its war on terrorism, but said Thursday
it would not allow U.S. troops on its soil.
President Gen. Pervez Musharraf has said Pakistani forces are
successfully hunting down al-Qaida and Taliban remnants in the border
region, and have arrested 600 members of al-Qaida throughout the
country.
"In a region where even the British army never entered (during the
colonial era) and our Pakistan army has entered only after a century,
we've got a very swift and very mobile hard-hitting quick reaction
force," Musharraf said in Switzerland last week.
The hard-line Mutahida Majlis-e-Amal -- also known as the United
Action Forum -- nevertheless said it would raise the issue of U.S.
troops in parliament. It threatened street protests if Washington did
get approval to operate inside Pakistan.
"If Pakistan gives permission to America for conducting military
operations in tribal regions, it will be very dangerous," Durrani
said. "In such a situation, the (U.S.) Army will face bullets from the
tribesmen."
He said so far tribesmen in the border regions, which are largely
autonomous from the central government, are showing restraint as
Pakistani troops search the region for al-Qaida fugitives.
"We are urging them not to resist the (Pakistani) army," Durrani said.
"But if Americans go into their areas, the tribesmen will not listen
to us."
Osama bin Laden and his top lieutenants are believed to be in hiding
in the border regions -- possibly inside Pakistan -- and sympathies
for the Taliban run high there.
In Afghanistan, the U.S. military has declined to comment on the
reported plans, saying it doesn't comment on future operations.
However, a military spokesman in Kabul said Thursday that U.S. forces
were "sure" they will catch bin Laden this year.
Pakistan says it has arrested more than 500 al-Qaida followers over
the past two years and many of them have been handed over to the
United States.
============================================================================
.
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
31 Jan 2004 11:34:04 AM |
|
|
(yipee yahoo) Spat the Words
from www.endtime.com
====================
Pakistan Warns U.S. About Crossing Border
January 30, 2004, 4:12 PM EST
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- A hard-line Islamic coalition warned Friday
that Pakistani tribesmen might open fire on American troops if the
United States extends a planned spring offensive against Afghan rebels
into Pakistan.
Hell, they've already shown they can can kill unarmed civilians.
They should try killing the trained US soldiers who have guns.
Such a move would be a "historic mistake," said Riaz Durrani,
Yeah, a historic mistake for the islamic militants. They
might never recover.
spokesman for the opposition coalition Mutahida Majlis-e-Amal, which
controls two Pakistani provinces bordering Afghanistan.
A U.S. official in Washington hinted this week that a planned effort
to step up the hunt for Taliban or al-Qaida fugitives at the end of
winter could go into Pakistan. For the past two years, thousands of
U.S. forces have been operating in southern and eastern Afghanistan
but say they haven't crossed the frontier.
The tribal areas are rugged, remote and historically autonomous areas
that were never really brought under the control of Pakistan's central
government. People there are linked by language and culture to Afghan
Pashtuns, the ethnic group that was the Taliban's power base.
Pakistan is a key U.S. ally in its war on terrorism, but said Thursday
it would not allow U.S. troops on its soil.
They don't allow al-qaeda on their soil either.
President Gen. Pervez Musharraf has said Pakistani forces are
successfully hunting down al-Qaida and Taliban remnants in the border
region, and have arrested 600 members of al-Qaida throughout the
country.
"In a region where even the British army never entered (during the
colonial era) and our Pakistan army has entered only after a century,
we've got a very swift and very mobile hard-hitting quick reaction
force," Musharraf said in Switzerland last week.
The hard-line Mutahida Majlis-e-Amal -- also known as the United
Action Forum -- nevertheless said it would raise the issue of U.S.
troops in parliament. It threatened street protests if Washington did
get approval to operate inside Pakistan.
"If Pakistan gives permission to America for conducting military
operations in tribal regions, it will be very dangerous," Durrani
said. "In such a situation, the (U.S.) Army will face bullets from the
tribesmen."
He said so far tribesmen in the border regions, which are largely
autonomous from the central government, are showing restraint as
Pakistani troops search the region for al-Qaida fugitives.
"We are urging them not to resist the (Pakistani) army," Durrani said.
"But if Americans go into their areas, the tribesmen will not listen
to us."
Osama bin Laden and his top lieutenants are believed to be in hiding
in the border regions -- possibly inside Pakistan -- and sympathies
for the Taliban run high there.
In Afghanistan, the U.S. military has declined to comment on the
reported plans, saying it doesn't comment on future operations.
However, a military spokesman in Kabul said Thursday that U.S. forces
were "sure" they will catch bin Laden this year.
Pakistan says it has arrested more than 500 al-Qaida followers over
the past two years and many of them have been handed over to the
United States.
=======================================================================
=====
.
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
31 Jan 2004 12:46:09 PM |
|
|
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> skrev i meddelandet
news:Xns94816B81964Crrfkwrantispamattbic@63.240.76.16...
yipeeeyahooo@hotmail.com (yipee yahoo) Spat the Words
from www.endtime.com
====================
Pakistan Warns U.S. About Crossing Border
January 30, 2004, 4:12 PM EST
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- A hard-line Islamic coalition warned Friday
that Pakistani tribesmen might open fire on American troops if the
United States extends a planned spring offensive against Afghan rebels
into Pakistan.
Hell, they've already shown they can can kill unarmed civilians.
Seppo's proved to be quite good at that too.
They should try killing the trained US soldiers who have guns.
The Iraqi resistance are managing quite well. Paki's will probably be just
as good at it.
Such a move would be a "historic mistake," said Riaz Durrani,
Yeah, a historic mistake for the islamic militants. They
might never recover.
And there's the yankie macho coming through LOL! Will you be there making
sure of it Foreman?
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
31 Jan 2004 04:48:41 PM |
|
|
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> skrev i meddelandet
news:Xns94816B81964Crrfkwrantispamattbic@63.240.76.16...
yipeeeyahooo@hotmail.com (yipee yahoo) Spat the Words
from www.endtime.com
====================
Pakistan Warns U.S. About Crossing Border
January 30, 2004, 4:12 PM EST
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- A hard-line Islamic coalition warned Friday
that Pakistani tribesmen might open fire on American troops if the
United States extends a planned spring offensive against Afghan
rebels into Pakistan.
Hell, they've already shown they can can kill unarmed civilians.
Seppo's proved to be quite good at that too.
They should try killing the trained US soldiers who have guns.
The Iraqi resistance are managing quite well. Paki's will probably be
just as good at it.
Such a move would be a "historic mistake," said Riaz Durrani,
Yeah, a historic mistake for the islamic militants. They
might never recover.
And there's the yankie macho coming through LOL! Will you be there
making sure of it Foreman?
I won't need to. The arabs are quite good at killing each other
off. Arabs killing arabs.
'Iraqi insurgents bomb police station, 9 iraqis killed.'
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 07:06:01 AM |
|
|
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> skrev i meddelandet
news:Xns9481A0D757C45rrfkwrantispamattbic@204.127.204.17...
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> skrev i meddelandet
news:Xns94816B81964Crrfkwrantispamattbic@63.240.76.16...
yipeeeyahooo@hotmail.com (yipee yahoo) Spat the Words
from www.endtime.com
====================
Pakistan Warns U.S. About Crossing Border
January 30, 2004, 4:12 PM EST
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- A hard-line Islamic coalition warned Friday
that Pakistani tribesmen might open fire on American troops if the
United States extends a planned spring offensive against Afghan
rebels into Pakistan.
Hell, they've already shown they can can kill unarmed civilians.
Seppo's proved to be quite good at that too.
They should try killing the trained US soldiers who have guns.
The Iraqi resistance are managing quite well. Paki's will probably be
just as good at it.
Such a move would be a "historic mistake," said Riaz Durrani,
Yeah, a historic mistake for the islamic militants. They
might never recover.
And there's the yankie macho coming through LOL! Will you be there
making sure of it Foreman?
I won't need to. The arabs are quite good at killing each other
off. Arabs killing arabs.
You do mean Iraqi's don't you and not collectively *Arabs*?
'Iraqi insurgents bomb police station, 9 iraqis killed.'
Yes...collaborators they are usually called when they cooperate with the
invasion forces, and work for them. What do you call them?
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 03:47:56 PM |
|
|
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
'Iraqi insurgents bomb police station, 9 iraqis killed.'
Yes...collaborators they are usually called when they cooperate with the
invasion forces, and work for them. What do you call them?
I'd call them individuals very happy to be rid of a despot
like hussein. They've been given a chance to form a stable
and free country and they're willing to give their lives to
see it happen. Those iraqi policemen are very courageous
individuals.
Also look at all the suicide attacks. Why would someone
from a secular group like the baathists commit a suicide
bombing? There can't be more than a couple of possibilities.
My hunch is their families and themselves are being
threatened with a horrible death or torture if they don't
carry out the suicide attack.
You still believe these baathists are worth defending, wh?
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 04:15:00 PM |
|
|
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> skrev i meddelandet
news:Xns9482968AFF450rrfkwrantispamattbic@204.127.204.17...
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
'Iraqi insurgents bomb police station, 9 iraqis killed.'
Yes...collaborators they are usually called when they cooperate with the
invasion forces, and work for them. What do you call them?
I'd call them individuals very happy to be rid of a despot
like hussein. They've been given a chance to form a stable
and free country and they're willing to give their lives to
see it happen. Those iraqi policemen are very courageous
individuals.
Also look at all the suicide attacks. Why would someone
from a secular group like the baathists commit a suicide
bombing? There can't be more than a couple of possibilities.
My hunch is their families and themselves are being
threatened with a horrible death or torture if they don't
carry out the suicide attack.
You still believe these baathists are worth defending, wh?
Listen here Foreman. I don't agree with any killing regardless of who does
it.
I don't defend Baathists...but I do have a problem with the yankie idea that
they can
topple a govt. because the said govt. dont agree with them...nothing to do
with Saddam Hussein. Nor has it to do with anyone else. A precident has been
set now. The seppo's can do as they like because they don't like what's
going on in another country. They shat on the UN and did it themselves.
Ameirca has 200 or so years of history behind it...now they are trying to
change 20000 years and more of history in both Iraq and Afghanistan. It
won't work. You can't teach an old dog new tricks...even you must know that?
You got to take the yankie ideals out of the Mid-East and leave them to
it...they are not Americans. Leave the ones and twos to it too and let
history take it's place. Then, and only then, will there be peace there.
I said before the seppo's invaded that they would leave behind a civil war
and seems like I was right. But the yankies are responsible for that.....not
Saddam. And the post is out there on google somewhere...I must be a
prophet...but your president is an ape! An evil eyed ponce.
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 04:24:19 PM |
|
|
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> skrev i meddelandet
news:Xns9482968AFF450rrfkwrantispamattbic@204.127.204.17...
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
'Iraqi insurgents bomb police station, 9 iraqis killed.'
Yes...collaborators they are usually called when they cooperate
with the invasion forces, and work for them. What do you call them?
I'd call them individuals very happy to be rid of a despot
like hussein. They've been given a chance to form a stable
and free country and they're willing to give their lives to
see it happen. Those iraqi policemen are very courageous
individuals.
Also look at all the suicide attacks. Why would someone
from a secular group like the baathists commit a suicide
bombing? There can't be more than a couple of possibilities.
My hunch is their families and themselves are being
threatened with a horrible death or torture if they don't
carry out the suicide attack.
You still believe these baathists are worth defending, wh?
Listen here Foreman. I don't agree with any killing regardless of who
does it.
I don't defend Baathists...but I do have a problem with the yankie
idea that they can
topple a govt. because the said govt. dont agree with them...nothing
to do with Saddam Hussein. Nor has it to do with anyone else. A
precident has been set now. The seppo's can do as they like because
they don't like what's going on in another country. They shat on the
UN and did it themselves. Ameirca has 200 or so years of history
behind it...now they are trying to change 20000 years and more of
history in both Iraq and Afghanistan. It won't work. You can't teach
an old dog new tricks...even you must know that?
You talk as if you're speaking for each individual iraqi person.
They're all different, each has different ideals. The majority
of them are overjoyed to be rid of a despot like hussein.
You got to take the yankie ideals out of the Mid-East and leave them
to it...they are not Americans. Leave the ones and twos to it too and
let history take it's place. Then, and only then, will there be peace
there.
You simplify things too much. Iraqis will take whatever 'yankee
ideals' they want and leave the rest. Some iraqis will take as
much western stuff and technology as possible and sell it to
the next iraqi. We're not forcing our ideals or lifestyle on them.
I said before the seppo's invaded that they would leave behind a
civil war and seems like I was right. But the yankies are responsible
for that.....not Saddam. And the post is out there on google
somewhere...I must be a prophet...but your president is an ape! An
evil eyed ponce.
Ok, I never liked bush either.
WH
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "RetroProphet" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
31 Jan 2004 01:54:57 PM |
|
|
====================
Pakistan Warns U.S. About Crossing Border
The U.S. might not have to...
===
Pakistan Adopting a Tough Old Tactic to Flush Out Qaeda
http://tinyurl.com/35tm9
excerpt:
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, Jan. 30 — At the start of the month,
Pakistan massed several thousand troops in and around the
town of Wana, near the country's mountainous border with
Afghanistan. Using a harsh century-old British method,
officials handed local tribal elders a list and issued
an ultimatum.
If 72 men wanted for sheltering Al Qaeda were not produced,
they said, the Pakistani Army would punish the tribe as
a group, demolishing houses, withdrawing funds and even
detaining tribe members.
Several days later, several thousand tribal elders held
a jirga, or council, and agreed to raise a force of
their own to find the wanted men. In the last two weeks,
the tribes have handed over 42 of them. Tribal members,
meanwhile, have bulldozed and dynamited the homes of
eight men who refused to surrender.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Last Church" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
30 Jan 2004 11:26:18 PM |
|
|
A hard-line Islamic coalition warned Friday
that Pakistani tribesmen might open fire on American troops if the
United States extends a planned spring offensive against Afghan rebels
into Pakistan.
So what! Bullets against jets is not a successful plan. If
they want to play kick *****, they will get a whooping. If your scared
get under your bed and hide.
Sergeant Major
Gene Roberts
USMC
Semper Fi
If you join the military
Death is part of the job.
Http://www.thelastchurch.org
Alt.religion.thelastchurch
.
|
|
|
| User: "DaarkSyde" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
31 Jan 2004 11:53:40 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 05:26:18 GMT, The Last Church
<bleahcim49@frontiernet.net> wrote:
A hard-line Islamic coalition warned Friday
that Pakistani tribesmen might open fire on American troops if the
United States extends a planned spring offensive against Afghan rebels
into Pakistan.
So what! Bullets against jets is not a successful plan. If
they want to play kick *****, they will get a whooping. If your scared
get under your bed and hide.
Hahahahah what a MORON. Russia couldn't win in Afghanistan and you
can't either. You have your hands full dodging bombs in Iraq which
will soon escalate into something you never expected.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Last Church" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
31 Jan 2004 11:11:04 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:53:40 -0500, DaarkSyde
<DaarkSyde@everywhere.com> wrote:
Hahahahah what a MORON. Russia couldn't win in Afghanistan and you
can't either.
Russia was fighting the USA in Afghanistan and we kicked their *****
out and gave it back to Afghanistan people. WE just did it again.
That is twice now. How many times do you need us to prove we can take
Afghanistan? LIne them up! Who is next? Marines like to kill!
You have your hands full dodging bombs in Iraq which
will soon escalate into something you never expected.
I expect terrorist to nuke Iraq if they get the chance and they love
to kill their own people. I always expect the worst so am never
disappointed when things turn out better. ,, Or worse..
Sergeant Major
Gene Roberts
USMC
Semper Fi
If you join the military
Death is part of the job.
Http://www.thelastchurch.org
Alt.religion.thelastchurch
.
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 07:17:36 AM |
|
|
"The Last Church" <bleahcim49@frontiernet.net> skrev i meddelandet
news:k41p109dlr0mp42at9slndf5hcir0de9ek@4ax.com...
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:53:40 -0500, DaarkSyde
<DaarkSyde@everywhere.com> wrote:
Hahahahah what a MORON. Russia couldn't win in Afghanistan and you
can't either.
Russia was fighting the USA in Afghanistan and we kicked their *****
out and gave it back to Afghanistan people.
When?
WE just did it again.
When?
That is twice now. How many times do you need us to prove we can take
Afghanistan? LIne them up! Who is next? Marines like to kill!
Another yankie macho wanker sitting behind a pc boasting about how good the
yankies are. We are aware that you yankies belong to a culture of killing
and hamburgers...why do you use "we" you *****? You're not there
obviously. The pronoun in this case is they...which means all the poor young
yankie bastards who have to go there and dodge bullets and bombs and travel
home in bodybags because your president is a fuckin' monkey. As usual very
few of them have the slightest idea where Iraq is and no clue as to why they
are there at all.
You have your hands full dodging bombs in Iraq which
will soon escalate into something you never expected.
I expect terrorist to nuke Iraq if they get the chance and they love
to kill their own people. I always expect the worst so am never
disappointed when things turn out better. ,, Or worse..
Jeeze you are an ***** aren't you? Such childish stupid ignorance I
haven't heard in quite a long time.
You are another one of those ignorant yankies that gives the rest of them a
bad name of being ignorant fuckin' dopes! What a twat! You do your country a
disservice by opening your stupid fuckin' mouth!
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 04:33:29 PM |
|
|
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:
Taliban were not at all a "faction" of the Mujahidin. Taliban were a
sect of university Islamic student fundamentalists. Started to
fight...became friends with the yanks and were allowed to do
whatever they liked. And we've all seen the result of that.
Who allowed them to do whatever they liked? The US had ended its
involvement by the time the Taliban emerged from the Mujahidin (led by
Bin Laden's fellow Mujahidin fighter, Mullah Mohammed Omar).
[quote] "The Taliban movement emerged out of the chaos and uncertainty
of the Afghan-Soviet War (1979-1989) and subsequent civil war in
Afghanistan."
"After the Soviets completed their withdrawal in 1989, civil war broke
out between the mujahideen factions and the central government."
"The Taliban emerged as a faction of mujahideen soldiers who
identified themselves as religious students."
"The Taliban actively recruited thousands of young men in the Afghan
refugee camps and the madrasas in Pakistan. Many war orphans also
joined the movement." [end quote]
http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761588418/Taliban.html
The Afghani's have ALWAYS been a land of different warlords...as
long as history has been written. Yankies will never
change that!
You my friend are an ***** who thinks that you know the phsyke
of these people. But it's all *****. When was the last time you
visited Afghanistan? Never I expect!
So ***** and talk about things you know about and things you have
actually experienced.
Should I have had to experience World War II in order to know anything
about it? Should *you* have had to experience the genocide in Sudan to
know anything about it?
What is it with Islamic fundamentalists? Leave, and they start killing
each other. Stay, and they start killing you.
Yankies yes! When I was there they didn't kill me...but then
again I hadn't an M16 with me and nor was I killing their folk!
You yanks are not welcome there because you're not welcome to disturb
thousands of years of culture with your hamburgers and Hollywood!
So *****!
The Mujahadin rebels did not reject US support when they were fighting
off the Soviet invasion. In fact, they welcomed it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 05:24:57 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:a2b35e99.0402011433.40dd32@posting.google.com...
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:
Taliban were not at all a "faction" of the Mujahidin. Taliban were a
sect of university Islamic student fundamentalists. Started to
fight...became friends with the yanks and were allowed to do
whatever they liked. And we've all seen the result of that.
Who allowed them to do whatever they liked? The US had ended its
involvement by the time the Taliban emerged from the Mujahidin (led by
Bin Laden's fellow Mujahidin fighter, Mullah Mohammed Omar).
You're trying to defend the indefensible my boy! First you say that the
Taliban were a part of the Mujahadin now you say this. The Taliban were not
part of the Mujjadin at all. They surfaced later...after the Soviets had
gone. They were from the universities in Afghanistan ands were/are real
fundamentalists.
[quote] "The Taliban movement emerged out of the chaos and uncertainty
of the Afghan-Soviet War (1979-1989) and subsequent civil war in
Afghanistan."
"After the Soviets completed their withdrawal in 1989, civil war broke
out between the mujahideen factions and the central government."
See..."AFTER"!
"The Taliban emerged as a faction of mujahideen soldiers who
identified themselves as religious students."
According to the yankie press I suppose. They were students of a very
fundamental Islamic sect yes...we know that!
"The Taliban actively recruited thousands of young men in the Afghan
refugee camps and the madrasas in Pakistan. Many war orphans also
joined the movement." [end quote]
http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761588418/Taliban.html
The Afghani's have ALWAYS been a land of different warlords...as
long as history has been written. Yankies will never
change that!
You my friend are an ***** who thinks that you know the phsyke
of these people. But it's all *****. When was the last time you
visited Afghanistan? Never I expect!
So ***** and talk about things you know about and things you have
actually experienced.
Do me a favour will you douglas isin't that your name? Get out of
yankieland...see the world...travel to these places and then give an
opinion...'cos right now you are just bullshitting about what you read in
the papers. That's the amount of experience you can claim to have!
Good night! See you next fuckin' week!
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "yipee yahoo" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 08:25:42 PM |
|
|
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<bvk1v5$8ei$1@green.tninet.se>...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:a2b35e99.0402011433.40dd32@posting.google.com...
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:
Taliban were not at all a "faction" of the Mujahidin. Taliban were a
sect of university Islamic student fundamentalists. Started to
fight...became friends with the yanks and were allowed to do
whatever they liked. And we've all seen the result of that.
Who allowed them to do whatever they liked? The US had ended its
involvement by the time the Taliban emerged from the Mujahidin (led by
Bin Laden's fellow Mujahidin fighter, Mullah Mohammed Omar).
You're trying to defend the indefensible my boy! First you say that the
Taliban were a part of the Mujahadin now you say this. The Taliban were not
part of the Mujjadin at all. They surfaced later...after the Soviets had
gone. They were from the universities in Afghanistan ands were/are real
fundamentalists.
[quote] "The Taliban movement emerged out of the chaos and uncertainty
of the Afghan-Soviet War (1979-1989) and subsequent civil war in
Afghanistan."
"After the Soviets completed their withdrawal in 1989, civil war broke
out between the mujahideen factions and the central government."
See..."AFTER"!
"The Taliban emerged as a faction of mujahideen soldiers who
identified themselves as religious students."
According to the yankie press I suppose. They were students of a very
fundamental Islamic sect yes...we know that!
"The Taliban actively recruited thousands of young men in the Afghan
refugee camps and the madrasas in Pakistan. Many war orphans also
joined the movement." [end quote]
http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761588418/Taliban.html
The Afghani's have ALWAYS been a land of different warlords...as
long as history has been written. Yankies will never
change that!
You my friend are an ***** who thinks that you know the phsyke
of these people. But it's all *****. When was the last time you
visited Afghanistan? Never I expect!
So ***** and talk about things you know about and things you have
actually experienced.
Do me a favour will you douglas isin't that your name? Get out of
yankieland...see the world...travel to these places and then give an
opinion...'cos right now you are just bullshitting about what you read in
the papers. That's the amount of experience you can claim to have!
Good night! See you next fuckin' week!
WH
U tell 'em, Chris ;-)
Good on ya !!!!!!!
Wally
=====================
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
02 Feb 2004 01:13:47 AM |
|
|
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<bvk1v5$8ei$1@green.tninet.se>...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:a2b35e99.0402011433.40dd32@posting.google.com...
Who allowed them to do whatever they liked? The US had ended its
involvement by the time the Taliban emerged from the Mujahidin (led by
Bin Laden's fellow Mujahidin fighter, Mullah Mohammed Omar).
You're trying to defend the indefensible my boy! First you say that
the Taliban were a part of the Mujahadin now you say this. The Taliban
were not part of the Mujjadin at all.
Not true. The leaders of the Taliban fought in the Mujahidin.
They surfaced later...after the Soviets had gone. They were from
the universities in Afghanistan ands were/are real fundamentalists.
The students you refer to were recruited by Mullah Mohammed Omar and
his followers from the Mujahidin.
[quote] "The Taliban movement emerged out of the chaos and uncertainty
of the Afghan-Soviet War (1979-1989) and subsequent civil war in
Afghanistan."
"After the Soviets completed their withdrawal in 1989, civil war broke
out between the mujahideen factions and the central government."
See..."AFTER"!
Isn't that what I said? Why, yes it is: "After the Soviet Union and
its puppet government were defeated..."
"The Taliban emerged as a faction of mujahideen soldiers who
identified themselves as religious students."
According to the yankie press I suppose. They were students of a very
fundamental Islamic sect yes...we know that!
They were students of Mullah Omar and his followers.
"The Taliban actively recruited thousands of young men in the Afghan
refugee camps and the madrasas in Pakistan. Many war orphans also
joined the movement." [end quote]
http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761588418/Taliban.html
The Afghani's have ALWAYS been a land of different warlords...as
long as history has been written. Yankies will never change that!
You my friend are an ***** who thinks that you know the phsyke
of these people. But it's all *****. When was the last time you
visited Afghanistan? Never I expect!
So ***** and talk about things you know about and things you have
actually experienced.
Why did you dodge my questions pertaining to experience?
Do me a favour will you douglas isin't that your name?
My name is Douglas ... what's you name, H?
Get out of yankieland...see the world...travel to these places and
then give an opinion...'cos right now you are just bullshitting about
what you read in the papers. That's the amount of experience you can claim to have!
I've done enough traveling outside these borders to know I'm very
happy where I live. As for experience (and my questions that you
conveniently snipped), I don't have to have experienced World War II
to know something about it, and *you* don't have to experience the
genocide in Sudan to know something about it (though it seems you
DIDN'T know about it, since you challenged me on it awhile back and
then disappeared when I responded with sources).
Good night! See you next fuckin' week!
Ah yes, the ol' hit and run ... I'll be here ...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Saint Isidore of Laytonville" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
02 Feb 2004 12:20:24 PM |
|
|
My choo choo train got a flat tire on Saturday.
I wonder if that was an omen?
The Psychedelick Pope
Saint Isidore of Laytonville
^Ö^ Patron Saint of the Internet ^Ö^
°°^Ö^ °°
http://apple2.org.za/gswv/me
AOXOMOXOA and ENESSA QUA ONNICA
.
|
|
|
| User: "yipee yahoo" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
02 Feb 2004 09:00:01 PM |
|
|
cturley2@aol.comWOMPWOMP (Saint Isidore of Laytonville) wrote in message news:<20040202132024.26465.00001294@mb-m07.aol.com>...
My choo choo train got a flat tire on Saturday.
I wonder if that was an omen?
An unusal way of spelling "tyre", Popey !!!!!
I didn't know that Trains had tyres ?!?!?
Uncle Wally (correct speller extraordinaire ;-)
==========================================================================
The Psychedelick Pope
Saint Isidore of Laytonville
^Ö^ Patron Saint of the Internet ^Ö^
°°^Ö^ °°
http://apple2.org.za/gswv/me
AOXOMOXOA and ENESSA QUA ONNICA
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 09:14:51 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 00:24:57 +0100, "WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:
Good night! See you next fuckin' week!
LOL!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Last Church" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 11:47:07 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 14:17:36 +0100, "WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:
"The Last Church"
Russia was fighting the USA in Afghanistan and we kicked their *****
out and gave it back to Afghanistan people.
When?
I thought you knew the facts. Why are you asking me!
Another yankie macho wanker sitting behind a pc boasting about how good the
yankies are.
And you;
Another terrorist macho wanker sitting behind a pc boasting about how
good the terrorist are.
I expect terrorist to nuke Iraq if they get the chance and they love
to kill their own people. I always expect the worst so am never
disappointed when things turn out better. ,, Or worse..
Jeeze you are an ***** aren't you? Such childish stupid ignorance I
haven't heard in quite a long time.
Then listen up you terrorist propagandist. Take you ***** back
to your house so we can track your stupid ***** down and light fire
Crackers in your *****. ( most fun if you give them a 1qt enema of
Gasoline first.)
You don't scare us...........
WH= Wimp Hiding
..
Sergeant Major
Gene Roberts
USMC
Semper Fi
If you join the military
Death is part of the job.
Http://www.thelastchurch.org
Alt.religion.thelastchurch
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 08:04:22 AM |
|
|
In article <k41p109dlr0mp42at9slndf5hcir0de9ek@4ax.com>, wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:53:40 -0500, DaarkSyde
<DaarkSyde@everywhere.com> wrote:
Hahahahah what a MORON. Russia couldn't win in Afghanistan and you
can't either.
Russia was fighting the USA in Afghanistan and we kicked their *****
out and gave it back to Afghanistan people. WE just did it again.
That is twice now. How many times do you need us to prove we can take
Afghanistan? LIne them up! Who is next? Marines like to kill!
The US was not in Afghanistan until after Russia gave up on them and pulled out.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 02:44:30 PM |
|
|
(Woodswun) wrote in message news:<GH7Tb.12925$iJ3.3409@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <k41p109dlr0mp42at9slndf5hcir0de9ek@4ax.com>, wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:53:40 -0500, DaarkSyde
<DaarkSyde@everywhere.com> wrote:
Hahahahah what a MORON. Russia couldn't win in Afghanistan and you
can't either.
Russia was fighting the USA in Afghanistan and we kicked their *****
out and gave it back to Afghanistan people. WE just did it again.
That is twice now. How many times do you need us to prove we can take
Afghanistan? LIne them up! Who is next? Marines like to kill!
The US was not in Afghanistan until after Russia gave up on them and pulled out.
In the last big battle of the Cold War, the US actively and vigorously
supported the Mujahidin in their fight to expel the Soviet Union from
Afghanistan.
Of course Bin Laden and his gang credit Allah with helping them defeat
the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Then they turn around and call the
US the great Satan. Why don't they make up their minds?
Once the Soviets and their puppet government were defeated, the US
left the Mujahidin to their own devices. And once the Soviet invader
was gone, the Mujahidin split into factions (one of which was the
Taliban) and started fighting amongst themeselves.
What is it with Islamic fundamentalists? Leave, and they start killing
each other. Stay, and they start killing you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 03:15:41 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:a2b35e99.0402011244.62d142ea@posting.google.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote in message
news:<GH7Tb.12925$iJ3.3409@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <k41p109dlr0mp42at9slndf5hcir0de9ek@4ax.com>,
bleahcim49@frontiernet.net wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:53:40 -0500, DaarkSyde
<DaarkSyde@everywhere.com> wrote:
Hahahahah what a MORON. Russia couldn't win in Afghanistan and you
can't either.
Russia was fighting the USA in Afghanistan and we kicked their *****
out and gave it back to Afghanistan people. WE just did it again.
That is twice now. How many times do you need us to prove we can take
Afghanistan? LIne them up! Who is next? Marines like to kill!
The US was not in Afghanistan until after Russia gave up on them and
pulled out.
In the last big battle of the Cold War, the US actively and vigorously
supported the Mujahidin in their fight to expel the Soviet Union from
Afghanistan.
Yes
Of course Bin Laden and his gang credit Allah with helping them defeat
the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Then they turn around and call the
US the great Satan. Why don't they make up their minds?
Because the stupid yanks supported something that they shouldn't have.
Anything to beat the Soviet Union. Never think of the consequences of their
actions. That's the seppo's for you.
Once the Soviets and their puppet government were defeated, the US
left the Mujahidin to their own devices. And once the Soviet invader
was gone, the Mujahidin split into factions (one of which was the
Taliban) and started fighting amongst themeselves.
Taliban were not at all a "faction" of the Mujahidin. Taliban were a sect of
university Islamic student fundamentalists. Started to fight...became
friends with the yanks and were allowed to do whatever they liked. And we've
all seen the result of that. The Afghani's have ALWAYS been a land of
different warlords...as long as history has been written. Yankies will never
change that! You my friend are an ***** who thinks that you know the
phsyke of these people. But it's all *****. When was the last time you
visited Afghanistan? Never I expect!
So ***** and talk about things you know about and things you have
actually experienced.
What is it with Islamic fundamentalists? Leave, and they start killing
each other. Stay, and they start killing you.
Yankies yes! When I was there they didn't kill me...but then again I hadn't
an M16 with me and nor was I killing their folk!
You yanks are not welcome there because you're not welcome to disturb
thousands of years of culture with your hamburgers and Hollywood!
So *****!
WH
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 03:46:16 PM |
|
|
In article <a2b35e99.0402011244.62d142ea@posting.google.com>, (Steven Douglas) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote in message
news:<GH7Tb.12925$iJ3.3409@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <k41p109dlr0mp42at9slndf5hcir0de9ek@4ax.com>,
bleahcim49@frontiernet.net wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:53:40 -0500, DaarkSyde
<DaarkSyde@everywhere.com> wrote:
Hahahahah what a MORON. Russia couldn't win in Afghanistan and you
can't either.
Russia was fighting the USA in Afghanistan and we kicked their *****
out and gave it back to Afghanistan people. WE just did it again.
That is twice now. How many times do you need us to prove we can take
Afghanistan? LIne them up! Who is next? Marines like to kill!
The US was not in Afghanistan until after Russia gave up on them and pulled
out.
In the last big battle of the Cold War, the US actively and vigorously
supported the Mujahidin in their fight to expel the Soviet Union from
Afghanistan.
Of course Bin Laden and his gang credit Allah with helping them defeat
the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Then they turn around and call the
US the great Satan. Why don't they make up their minds?
Once the Soviets and their puppet government were defeated, the US
left the Mujahidin to their own devices. And once the Soviet invader
was gone, the Mujahidin split into factions (one of which was the
Taliban) and started fighting amongst themeselves.
What is it with Islamic fundamentalists? Leave, and they start killing
each other. Stay, and they start killing you.
Precisely the reason we should have stayed out of Iraq. Odd that nobody sees
this unless it's someone else's screw-up.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 04:17:45 PM |
|
|
(Woodswun) Spat the Words
In article <a2b35e99.0402011244.62d142ea@posting.google.com>,
dsteven@flashmail.com (Steven Douglas) wrote:
(Woodswun) wrote in message
news:<GH7Tb.12925$iJ3.3409@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <k41p109dlr0mp42at9slndf5hcir0de9ek@4ax.com>,
bleahcim49@frontiernet.net wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:53:40 -0500, DaarkSyde
<DaarkSyde@everywhere.com> wrote:
Hahahahah what a MORON. Russia couldn't win in Afghanistan and you
can't either.
Russia was fighting the USA in Afghanistan and we kicked their *****
out and gave it back to Afghanistan people. WE just did it again.
That is twice now. How many times do you need us to prove we can
take Afghanistan? LIne them up! Who is next? Marines like to
kill!
The US was not in Afghanistan until after Russia gave up on them and
pulled
out.
In the last big battle of the Cold War, the US actively and vigorously
supported the Mujahidin in their fight to expel the Soviet Union from
Afghanistan.
Of course Bin Laden and his gang credit Allah with helping them defeat
the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Then they turn around and call the
US the great Satan. Why don't they make up their minds?
Once the Soviets and their puppet government were defeated, the US
left the Mujahidin to their own devices. And once the Soviet invader
was gone, the Mujahidin split into factions (one of which was the
Taliban) and started fighting amongst themeselves.
What is it with Islamic fundamentalists? Leave, and they start killing
each other. Stay, and they start killing you.
Precisely the reason we should have stayed out of Iraq. Odd that
nobody sees this unless it's someone else's screw-up.
I would agree with that. We (bush) never should have started
this. But we're here now. If we leave too soon, the whole
country will erupt in civil war, which may drag surrounding
countries into it, like turkey, syria, iran.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ex." |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
02 Feb 2004 06:59:33 PM |
|
|
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns94829B9939405rrfkwrantispamattbic@204.127.204.17...
: (Woodswun) Spat the Words
:
: > In article <a2b35e99.0402011244.62d142ea@posting.google.com>,
: > (Steven Douglas) wrote:
: >> (Woodswun) wrote in message
: >> news:<GH7Tb.12925$iJ3.3409@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
: >>> In article <k41p109dlr0mp42at9slndf5hcir0de9ek@4ax.com>,
: >> wrote:
: >>> >On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:53:40 -0500, DaarkSyde
: >>> ><DaarkSyde@everywhere.com> wrote:
: >>> >
: >>> >>Hahahahah what a MORON. Russia couldn't win in Afghanistan and you
: >>> >>can't either.
: >>> >
: >>> >Russia was fighting the USA in Afghanistan and we kicked their *****
: >>> >out and gave it back to Afghanistan people. WE just did it again.
: >>> >That is twice now. How many times do you need us to prove we can
: >>> >take Afghanistan? LIne them up! Who is next? Marines like to
: >>> >kill!
: >>>
: >>> The US was not in Afghanistan until after Russia gave up on them and
: >>> pulled
: >> out.
: >>
: >>In the last big battle of the Cold War, the US actively and vigorously
: >>supported the Mujahidin in their fight to expel the Soviet Union from
: >>Afghanistan.
: >>
: >>Of course Bin Laden and his gang credit Allah with helping them defeat
: >>the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Then they turn around and call the
: >>US the great Satan. Why don't they make up their minds?
: >>
: >>Once the Soviets and their puppet government were defeated, the US
: >>left the Mujahidin to their own devices. And once the Soviet invader
: >>was gone, the Mujahidin split into factions (one of which was the
: >>Taliban) and started fighting amongst themeselves.
: >>
: >>What is it with Islamic fundamentalists? Leave, and they start killing
: >>each other. Stay, and they start killing you.
: >
: > Precisely the reason we should have stayed out of Iraq. Odd that
: > nobody sees this unless it's someone else's screw-up.
:
: I would agree with that. We (bush) never should have started
: this. But we're here now. If we leave too soon, the whole
: country will erupt in civil war, which may drag surrounding
: countries into it, like turkey, syria, iran.
:
The other probability is that civil war will erupt and the U.S. will be
catching fire from both sides.
And the surrounding countries will likely be pulled into it anyways to
safeguard their own self-interests.
Hell, they just killed close to 100 Kurds with a couple of bombs. The T's
want the Kurds to unite ...
Turkey will get into to kill off the Kurds, Iran will start arming the
Shiites, and so on ... it's a fucking mess there and Bush was a total idiot
going in all gung-ho without any knowledge or research of the area and what
it entails. Cheney is a fucking weasel who should be shot for treason.
/ex
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 05:04:13 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns94829B9939405rrfkwrantispamattbic@204.127.204.17>, "R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) Spat the Words
In article <a2b35e99.0402011244.62d142ea@posting.google.com>,
dsteven@flashmail.com (Steven Douglas) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote in message
news:<GH7Tb.12925$iJ3.3409@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <k41p109dlr0mp42at9slndf5hcir0de9ek@4ax.com>,
bleahcim49@frontiernet.net wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:53:40 -0500, DaarkSyde
<DaarkSyde@everywhere.com> wrote:
Hahahahah what a MORON. Russia couldn't win in Afghanistan and you
can't either.
Russia was fighting the USA in Afghanistan and we kicked their *****
out and gave it back to Afghanistan people. WE just did it again.
That is twice now. How many times do you need us to prove we can
take Afghanistan? LIne them up! Who is next? Marines like to
kill!
The US was not in Afghanistan until after Russia gave up on them and
pulled
out.
In the last big battle of the Cold War, the US actively and vigorously
supported the Mujahidin in their fight to expel the Soviet Union from
Afghanistan.
Of course Bin Laden and his gang credit Allah with helping them defeat
the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Then they turn around and call the
US the great Satan. Why don't they make up their minds?
Once the Soviets and their puppet government were defeated, the US
left the Mujahidin to their own devices. And once the Soviet invader
was gone, the Mujahidin split into factions (one of which was the
Taliban) and started fighting amongst themeselves.
What is it with Islamic fundamentalists? Leave, and they start killing
each other. Stay, and they start killing you.
Precisely the reason we should have stayed out of Iraq. Odd that
nobody sees this unless it's someone else's screw-up.
I would agree with that. We (bush) never should have started
this. But we're here now. If we leave too soon, the whole
country will erupt in civil war, which may drag surrounding
countries into it, like turkey, syria, iran.
Agreed, but I suspect that we'll pull out prematurely due to the political
ramifications of (1)having screwed up by going in the first place and (2)being
there for more than a few months alread (which, btw, *also* should have been
anticipated).
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 05:20:50 PM |
|
|
(Woodswun) wrote:
In article <a2b35e99.0402011244.62d142ea@posting.google.com>,
dsteven@flashmail.com (Steven Douglas) wrote:
What is it with Islamic fundamentalists? Leave, and they start killing
each other. Stay, and they start killing you.
Precisely the reason we should have stayed out of Iraq. Odd that
nobody sees this unless it's someone else's screw-up.
Yeah, I also had Iraq in mind when I asked that question. However, I
agree with David Kay that the world is a safer place with Saddam
Hussein behind bars.
But my larger question remains unanswered. What is it with that
culture of death? For instance, it's happening in Sudan right now and
has absolutely nothing to do with the US.
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
01 Feb 2004 11:20:32 PM |
|
|
(Steven Douglas) Spat the Words
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun) wrote:
In article <a2b35e99.0402011244.62d142ea@posting.google.com>,
(Steven Douglas) wrote:
What is it with Islamic fundamentalists? Leave, and they start killing
each other. Stay, and they start killing you.
Precisely the reason we should have stayed out of Iraq. Odd that
nobody sees this unless it's someone else's screw-up.
Yeah, I also had Iraq in mind when I asked that question. However, I
agree with David Kay that the world is a safer place with Saddam
Hussein behind bars.
But my larger question remains unanswered. What is it with that
culture of death? For instance, it's happening in Sudan right now and
has absolutely nothing to do with the US.
True, does seem to be inordinate amount of killing in Arab
countries, but then, the western civilization went through
multiple world wars which killed hundreds of millions. I
guess the killing continues until understanding is reached
and the parties involved achieve a satisfaction.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ex." |
|
| Title: Re: WORLD WAR THREE **NEWS** Saturday, January 31, 2004 AD.............................. |
02 Feb 2004 07:06:09 PM |
|
|
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9482E346951F7rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.148.227.77...
: (Steven Douglas) Spat the Words
:
: > (Woodswun) wrote:
: >>In article <a2b35e99.0402011244.62d142ea@posting.google.com>,
: > (Steven Douglas) wrote:
: >> >What is it with Islamic fundamentalists? Leave, and they start killing
: >> >each other. Stay, and they start killing you.
: >>
: >> Precisely the reason we should have stayed out of Iraq. Odd that
: >> nobody sees this unless it's someone else's screw-up.
: >
: > Yeah, I also had Iraq in mind when I asked that question. However, I
: > agree with David Kay that the world is a safer place with Saddam
: > Hussein behind bars.
: >
: > But my larger question remains unanswered. What is it with that
: > culture of death? For instance, it's happening in Sudan right now and
: > has absolutely nothing to do with the US.
: >
:
: True, does seem to be inordinate amount of killing in Arab
: countries, but then, the western civilization went through
: multiple world wars which killed hundreds of millions. I
: guess the killing continues until understanding is reached
: and the parties involved achieve a satisfaction.
:
I think it'll take an invasion from outer space until people stop killing
people and start killing something else. People just like killing for some
reason ... seems to be the makeup of a high percentage of the worlds human
population.
/ex
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
World War III **NEWS** Update......Saturday, October 9th, 2004
world war III news, saturday, march 18th, 2006 AD...............The fifth horseman
OK then I'll predict a catagory 5 when it hits land at 11:48 am Saturday
Garfield with Guns, Saturday, September 2nd, 2006 AD........
WORLD WAR III NEWS, SATURDAY, APRIL 1st, 2006 AD (The Year of Our Lord ;-)
World War III *NEWS* Saturday, September 5th, 2003
World War III **NEWS** Saturday, July 26, 2003.....Palestinians Say Abbas's Success Hinges on Israel
World War III NEWS, Saturday, April 8th, 2006 AD.....Plans Stepped Up as Tehran Tests Weapons
| Re: Saturn worship, or going to the Saturday worship service...
in the week of sunday, april 2nd, 2006 to saturday, april 8th, 2006 the sh!t will hit the fan & the fat lady will scream her frickin' guts out !!! ;-)
WORLD WAR III NEWS, SATURDAY, JULY 1ST, 2006 AD
Anyone Else See The Satellite on Saturday Night ???
World War III NEWS, Saturday, April 29th, 2006 AD....Iran hurls defiance as UN braces itself for a nuclear showdown
World War III *NEWS* Saturday, August 30th, 2003 AD..........+
Torreys Peak Climb .. Saturday 6/23/07
|
|
|
